A party must file his or her recommended division of property and debts and cause it to be served on the other party within ten (10) calendar days before the hearing unless it has been filed with the petition or response.
If there are children of the marriage, property and debts shall be divided with the children’s well-being as the primary objective.
If the parties have agreed to the division of property and debts, the agreement shall be reviewed according to the Proposed Agreed Order provisions of section
21.04.19 (b).
If the parties have not agreed to the division of property and debts, the Court may order the parties to attempt to reach agreement, except in cases where the parties have a history of domestic violence. In the absence of agreement by the parties, the Court shall divide the parties’ property and debts. In making the division, the Court shall be guided by the following factors:
(a) Property shall be divided with the minor children’s well-being as the first and foremost consideration;
(b) Property and debts acquired during the marriage belong equally to the spouses unless the spouses have agreed that certain property or debts are separate. The Court may be guided by, but is not bound by, the principles of community property law;
(c) Neither inherited property nor property held in trust by the U.S. for the individual is subject to property division by the Court;
(d) If a party owns or is purchasing a home on land assigned on the Port Gamble S’Klallam Reservation, a copy of the purchase or ownership agreement and a copy of the lot assignment certificate shall be submitted to the Court before the final division of property.
Lot assignment, ownership and occupancy are three different issues. Lot assignment and lot occupancy are within the exclusive authority of the Tribal Council. Decisions regarding home ownership may be within the jurisdiction of the Court if the home can be separated from the lot.
The Court may stay the proceedings under this chapter while the Tribal Council makes a decision regarding lot assignment and/or occupancy so that the Court can take the Tribal Council’s decision into account in dividing the rest of the couple’s property and debts.
(e) In cases where the parties have a history of domestic violence common ownership of property should be avoided and the Court may use property division to help promote the independence of the abused spouse.
(Res. 04 A 034, 3/9/2004)