It is the procedure to make the qualification selection first and then to discuss the price because both parties need to review in detail what is involved in the work (for example, estimates of man-hours, personnel costs, and alternatives that the architect, engineer, or land surveyor should consider in depth). Once parameters have been fully discussed and understood and the architect, engineer or land surveyor proposes a fee for the work, the recommended procedure requires the city to make its own evaluation and judgment as to the reasonableness of the fee.
If the fee is fair and reasonable, award is made without consideration of proposals and fees of other competing firms. If the fee cannot be negotiated to the satisfaction of the city, negotiations are initiated with another firm selected in the same manner, or which has already been ranked as next most qualified. Thus price clearly is an important factor in the award of architectural and engineering services contract under this procedure. The principal difference between the recommended procedure for architect, engineer, or land surveyor selection and the procedures used in most other competitive source selection is the point at which price is considered.
(Ord. 1341 § 5, 1986)