The development standards of the zoning districts, of RRMC Title 17, and the base lot standards of Chapter 16.20 RRMC represent the historic method of ensuring a safe, livable and economic community. The planned unit development process is intended to permit development using alternative standards to occur, and yet maintain the safety, livability and economy of the community. The purpose of the planned unit development process is as follows:
A. 
To provide an alternative to the zoning district lot standards for the zoning districts set forth in RRMC Title 17 and the base lot standards set forth in Chapter 16.20 RRMC.
B. 
To encourage land use and development based upon the unique physical opportunities and constraints of each particular site, with the result that the overall appearance and livability of the community is enhanced.
C. 
To encourage diversity in building types, site arrangement and ownership of real property.
D. 
To encourage the greatest economic use of the land and to lower unit development cost, in exchange for better use of open space, more recreational facilities, and greater resource conservation when possible using the base standards of RRMC Title 17 or Chapter 16.20 RRMC.
E. 
To provide a development project equal to or superior to that possible under the base zoning district standards of RRMC Title 17 or the base lot standards of Chapter 16.20 RRMC.
F. 
To recognize the need to protect and buffer dissimilar development in the established districts, and to set a good precedent for future development in newly developing districts.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.010; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
An approved planned unit development (PUD), as finally approved, shall have the effect of varying the zoning district lot standards of RRMC Title 17 and the base lot standards of Chapter 16.20 RRMC, without need of other variance procedures. All other provisions of RRMC Title 17 and of this title shall apply, as well as all other provisions of other city ordinances and standards.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.020; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
A. 
Residential PUD. Uses are permitted consistent with the applicable zoning district. In addition, open space, playgrounds, bike and pedestrian trails, recreation facilities and community centers are also permitted unless prohibited in the applicable zoning district. Building types may vary from those specified in the applicable zoning district.
B. 
Commercial or Industrial PUD. Uses are permitted consistent with the applicable zoning district.
C. 
Mixed-Use Residential/Commercial PUD. Uses are permitted consistent with the applicable zoning district.
D. 
ORT or Office, Research and Technology Commercial District PUD. Uses are permitted consistent with the applicable zoning district.
E. 
T&R or Travel and Recreation Business District PUD. Uses are permitted consistent with the applicable zoning district.
F. 
LI or Light Industrial District PUD. Uses are permitted consistent with the applicable zoning district.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.030; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
A. 
Requirement. A partition tentative plan and final plat or a subdivision tentative plan and final plat shall be prepared as provided in Chapter 16.15 RRMC for PUD requests involving partitioning or subdividing of land, interests in land, unit ownership, or involving tax lot segregation.
B. 
Combined Map or Plat. Where practical, the partition or subdivision plans and plats required by Chapter 16.15 RRMC may be combined with the PUD tentative plan and final plat as required by this chapter; provided, that all of the submittal requirements for each chapter are satisfied.
C. 
Procedure Type. A concurrent subdivision or partition and PUD application shall be processed as a PUD, as provided in the land division procedure schedule, RRMC § 16.10.040, except that the procedure type utilized shall be the highest type required by Chapter 16.15 RRMC, Subdivision, this chapter, or Chapter 16.40 RRMC, Partition.
D. 
Criteria. For a concurrent application, the approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the PUD plan shall be based upon the criteria for a PUD, where all the approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the partition or subdivision plat shall be based upon the criteria for a partition or subdivision, excepting only lot area, width, yard requirements, and internal setback requirements of RRMC Title 17 and Chapter 16.20 RRMC. All provisions relating to streets and utilities shall be in full effect and are not subject to variance through the PUD procedure.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.040; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The provisions of this section apply to all land within the city limits or proposed for annexation to the city. For all planned unit developments, no land, interest in land, unit ownership or tax segregation shall be created for sale prior to final approval of the PUD. For those PUDs that include the subdivision or partition of lands, no land, interest in land, unit ownership or tax segregation shall be created for sale prior to final approval of both the PUD and the subdivision or partition.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.050; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
No PUD final plat may be considered for approval until the PUD tentative plan is approved. No PUD final plat that includes a subdivision plat may be considered for approval until the subdivision tentative plan is also approved.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.105; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The applicant shall submit four copies, two full size, one scaled for eight and one-half inch by 11 inches, and one in the preferred digital format, of a PUD tentative plan and supporting materials to the city administrator. The following shall be included:
A. 
Signed Application Form. A completed application form as provided by the city administrator, signed by the property owner, the applicant, and the applicant's agent, if any. To initiate the application, the applicant or the applicant's agent, if other than the property owner, must have written, notarized authorization, on a form provided by the city, from the property owner, to represent the owner in the requested PUD review.
B. 
Application Fee. Application fee is determined by the city council application fee schedule in effect on the date of the application.
C. 
Tentative Plan Map. A subdivision tentative plan map meeting all the requirements of RRMC § 16.15.040(C) shall be provided, including the following:
1. 
Buildings and Structures. Location and floor area, size of all existing and proposed structures and other features including maximum heights, types of dwelling units and nonresidential structures, renderings and elevations of typical structures.
2. 
Public Areas. The location and approximate size of all areas to be dedicated for general public ownership and use.
3. 
Open Space – Public, Private and Common. The location and size of all outdoor open space areas shall be delineated on the plan map, differentiating between privately owned areas, easements and commonly owned areas.
4. 
Landscaping. A general landscape plan indicating location, areas to be landscaped and general landscape material to be used.
5. 
PUD Perimeter Buffering. Show proposed treatment of the PUD perimeter, including vegetative screens, fences, setbacks, windows and walls.
6. 
Statement of Proposed Financing. A general statement showing commitment of lender's or applicant's ability to finance the project through to completion.
7. 
Project Intent. A statement describing the objectives to be achieved through the PUD process that cannot be achieved through the conventional land development process. The statement shall include a description of the character of the proposed project and some of the rationale in choosing the development concept, and shall include a statement of intention to the future selling or leasing of all or portions of the PUD, such as land areas, dwelling units, etc.
8. 
Development Schedule. A statement indicating the approximate construction dates for beginning and ending the project, including any proposed phases or stages of development.
9. 
Land Use Data. Quantitative description in table form of the following:
a. 
Total acres of the site.
b. 
Acres dedicated to public right-of-way.
c. 
Usable acres of the site (subsection (C)(9)(a) of this section minus subsection (C)(9)(b) of this section).
d. 
Density factors used (dwelling units per acre).
e. 
Maximum allowable dwelling units (subsection (C)(9)(c) of this section times subsection (C)(9)(d) of this section).
f. 
Actual dwelling units (dwelling units proposed).
g. 
Area of recreation open space (number of acres and percent of the usable site area).
h. 
Side-by-side matrix (of similar objective analysis) comparing PUD outcomes to by-right development, documenting where and how superior outcomes are achieved (housing variety, open space, connectivity, hazard avoidance, etc.). This improves clarity for review bodies and applicants and ensures the PUD process provides genuine community benefit.
D. 
Conceptual Utility Plan. A conceptual utility plan meeting all the requirements of a subdivision conceptual utility plan per RRMC § 16.15.040(F).
E. 
Fire Prevention Plan. A fire prevention plan identifying compliance with both the Oregon Specialty Code and Oregon Fire Code shall be included with the tentative plan.
F. 
Master Plan. A master plan, if needed, meeting all the requirements of a subdivision master plan per RRMC § 16.15.040(E).
G. 
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) shall be prepared by a traffic engineer or civil engineer licensed to practice in the state of Oregon, with specialized training and experience in traffic engineering. The analysis must be conducted in accordance with the public works department's document titled Traffic Impact Analysis. Coordination with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is required when ODOT is the road authority, and the analysis must comply with OAR 734-051-180 and 660-012.
1. 
A TIA or simplified transportation review is required based on the following thresholds:
a. 
If the proposed development is projected to generate more than 100 average daily trips (ADT), a simplified transportation impact letter or report may be submitted in lieu of a full TIA.
b. 
The city engineer may require a full TIA if one or more of the following conditions apply:
i. 
The development is expected to increase traffic volumes on a local residential street to more than 200 average daily trips (ADT) or raise the eighty-fifth percentile speed above 28 mph.
ii. 
The development is anticipated to affect geometrically constrained access points, intersections with a known safety history, or intersections/roadways operating near capacity.
2. 
Simplified Letter.
a. 
Content.
i. 
Weekday a.m./p.m. peak hour and daily trip generation estimate.
ii. 
Sight distance verification at project access points (by registered Oregon traffic or civil engineer).
iii. 
Safety evaluation within one-quarter mile of project frontage (road geometry, sight distance, high collision locations, access spacing, street lighting/visibility).
iv. 
Evaluation of on-site circulation and connectivity to adjacent parcels.
v. 
Discussion of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, including nearest routes and potential connections.
vi. 
Description of safe walking routes to schools within one-half mile.
vii. 
City discretion to require additional analysis beyond the above.
b. 
Mitigation Measures. Where the TIA demonstrates that performance standards will be exceeded, the applicant shall propose mitigation measures, which may include but are not limited to:
i. 
Intersection improvements, such as added turn lanes or signal timing changes.
ii. 
Roadway capacity enhancements, such as widening or realignment.
iii. 
Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, including sidewalks, crossings, and bike lanes.
iv. 
Transit access improvements or implementation of transportation demand management (TDM) strategies.
v. 
Off-site improvements required to mitigate impacts beyond the site frontage.
3. 
Traffic Impact Study.
a. 
Content.  The TIA shall provide adequate information to demonstrate that the level of impact to the street system will not exceed a volume over capacity (V/C) ratio of 0.80. Whenever performance standards of local, arterial or collector roads are determined to be above 0.80 V/C and transportation improvements are not planned within the planning horizon to bring the performance standards below 0.80 V/C, the TIA shall demonstrate that the level of impact to the street system will not exceed a 0.80 V/C ratio. The road system shall provide adequate access to buildings for residents, visitors, customers, deliveries, emergency vehicles, and garbage collection.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.110; Ord. 23-418-O § 104; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The review body shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request based upon all of the following criteria:
A. 
The plan conforms to the requirements of the city's floodway and floodplain requirements and restrictions, and conforms to the requirements of any applicable overlay district.
B. 
Utility and transportation plans must address current and projected future capacity, utilize resilient/low-impact design where feasible, and demonstrate coordination with city and regional system plans.
C. 
Cuts, fills and retaining walls shall comply with the standards in RRMC § 17.95.090, Hillside protection.
D. 
The proposed plan complies with the applicable portion of the city's comprehensive land use plan, this title and other city ordinances, state statute and federal law.
E. 
The planned unit development proposal shall result in an equal or superior development, compared to what would be provided under standard zoning and subdivision requirements, by providing a balanced exchange of benefits between the developer and the community. This exchange shall be demonstrated as follows:
1. 
Enhanced protection, restoration, and permanent preservation of environmental resources, including but not limited to native vegetation, wildlife habitat, wetlands, watercourses, and natural landforms. Such protection shall be secured through conservation easements or other perpetual legal mechanisms. The proposal shall also provide publicly accessible open space and recreational facilities beyond those minimally required by code, ensuring significant long-term community benefit and ecological integrity;
2. 
Improved transportation connectivity: The development shall enhance transportation linkages, with particular emphasis on pedestrian, bicycle, RV, and electric vehicle infrastructure. All facilities and connections must exceed minimum base code requirements, be consistent with the city's adopted transportation plans, and be designed to maximize safety, convenience, and community integration;
3. 
Any other benefit, as deemed in line with the purpose statement of this section, as stated in RRMC § 16.35.010.
F. 
Phased PUDs shall require submission of a phasing schedule, and city-approved performance bonds or comparable security for public or common improvements.
G. 
All required common open space and conservation areas shall be permanently protected by a recorded conservation easement, deed restriction, or similar legal instrument approved by the city attorney, ensuring that such areas remain undeveloped and are dedicated to recreational, open space, or environmental purposes in perpetuity.
H. 
The applicant shall provide demonstrable evidence that all utility and service needs for the proposed development will be met, not solely by conformance to master plans but by meeting or exceeding the following standards:
1. 
Will-Serve Letters and Capacity Analysis.
a. 
The applicant shall submit current will-serve letters from all relevant utility providers – including domestic water, sanitary sewer, electricity, gas, stormwater management, and telecommunications – affirming their ability and commitment to serve the proposed development as designed.
b. 
Each provider's letter must include confirmation that the existing or planned infrastructure has adequate available capacity to serve the projected demand of the completed development, taking into account current and committed loads.
2. 
Adequacy of Water Supply.
a. 
The applicant shall submit an engineering report demonstrating that the anticipated potable water demand can be met under both average and peak conditions.
b. 
The report must address:
i. 
Available system pressures and compliance with Oregon Health Authority minimums.
ii. 
A calculation of fire flow availability meeting applicable fire code requirements for the proposed building types and density.
iii. 
Identification and locations of required fire hydrants.
3. 
Sanitary Sewer.
a. 
Submit a sanitary sewer analysis prepared by a licensed engineer showing that the public system has sufficient capacity for both normal and peak wastewater flows from the project.
b. 
If upgrades/extensions are needed, provide stamped civil plans and a schedule for completion, subject to city engineer approval.
4. 
Stormwater Management.
a. 
Submit a detailed stormwater management plan prepared by a qualified engineer.
b. 
The plan must:
i. 
Document compliance with city stormwater and drainage regulations.
ii. 
Demonstrate sufficient public and/or private infrastructure to manage quantity and quality of runoff resulting from the proposed impervious surfaces.
iii. 
Identify any needed upgrades or new facilities.
5. 
Fire Flow.
a. 
Provide documentation from the local fire authority confirming that fire flow and hydrant siting requirements for the proposed land uses and building sizes will be met upon project completion.
b. 
Where fire flow is insufficient, the applicant must identify and commit to the necessary system upgrades or additional fire protection measures.
6. 
Plan for Upgrades and Extensions (If Applicable).
a. 
If any utility provider identifies existing infrastructure as inadequate, the applicant must submit:
i. 
Detailed plans for all required upgrades, extensions, or new facilities.
ii. 
Evidence of financial and schedule commitments for all needed improvements.
iii. 
Written concurrence from the city engineer that the proposed improvements will resolve all deficiencies before building occupancy.
I. 
The applicant has demonstrated the ability to finance the project through to final completion.
(Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.120; Ord. 23-418-O § 105; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
A. 
In addition to all the other requirements made applicable by this title, the review body may authorize a planned unit development subdivision within a residential zone only when all of the following requirements are met:
1. 
The density of land use shall be no more than 20 percent higher than allowed in the zoning district. Incentives such as increased density of 30 percent may be granted for providing deed-restricted affordable housing or for developments with enhanced Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant accessibility features. The review body may also grant increased density allowances based on a combination of these two criteria.
2. 
The common open spaces comprise at least 20 percent of the land area contained in the development exclusive of streets, and at least 80 percent of the common open space shall be located on slopes with less than 15 percent grades. Common open spaces shall be used for recreational, park or environmental purposes, such as watershed management, wildlife or special plant habitat, wetland protection or other similar purposes.
3. 
All parking spaces for a PUD shall be located on site and shall meet the following minimum standards:
a. 
One parking space is required per dwelling unit, unless a reduction is approved based on the inclusion of electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure.
b. 
Parking may be located within an enclosed garage, carport, unenclosed parking space, or shared parking facilities.
c. 
When on-street parking is either impractical or restricted due to street design limitations, one and one-half off-street parking spaces per dwelling unit must be provided, in addition to the standard off-street parking requirements. This requirement may be reduced if the applicant demonstrates that one or more of the reduction criteria outlined in RRMC § 17.70.020(J) are met.
4. 
Improved transportation connectivity shall include one of the following:
a. 
Multi-Modal Transportation Connectivity – Pedestrian/Bicycle Infrastructure. The development must incorporate a network of bicycle and pedestrian pathways within the planned unit development (PUD) and ensure future connectivity. As required by the city, the owner shall record a guarantee for future improvements or similar legal instrument approved by the city attorney.
b. 
RV Storage Parking. For developments exceeding 20 units, 20 percent of parking shall be dedicated to recreational vehicle (RV) parking. These spaces must be located in a designated area accessible to all residents or arranged as approved by the review body.
c. 
Electric Vehicle Parking. For developments exceeding 20 units, electrical infrastructure shall be provided to support Level 2 electric vehicle (EV) charging station-ready parking spaces for at least 20 percent of the total parking spaces (rounded up).
(Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The purpose of tentative plan review is to provide sufficient opportunity for the public and the review body to address the critical and material land use issues. The applicant must provide substantial evidence of compliance with the mapping and approval criteria, as well as other city standards.
(Formerly 16.35.095; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.210; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
Tentative plan review is the most critical stage in the PUD process. It is at this stage that discretion is applied to evaluate compliance with criteria for approval, the extent of deviation from city ordinance standards, and to address impacts of the proposed development. For this reason, additional detail may be required from the applicant, and development conditions may be imposed upon the project by the review body.
(Formerly 16.35.100; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.220; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
Within 18 months following the effective date of the approved tentative plan, the final plat shall be submitted to the city planner with all conditions of tentative plan approval fulfilled. The city planner may, upon written request by the applicant, grant a 12-month extension of the expiration date. Upon granting an extension, the city planner shall make written findings that the facts upon which the approval was based have not changed to an extent sufficient to warrant refiling of the tentative plan and that no other subsequent development approval will be affected.
(Formerly 16.35.120; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.240; Ord. 23-418-O § 107; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
Prior to submitting construction documents for city review, the applicant shall submit a revised tentative plan demonstrating compliance with the conditions of approval. The city planner may waive this requirement if no significant modifications are required in order to comply with these conditions.
(Formerly 16.35.130; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.245; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
A. 
Sanitary sewer, potable and fire flow water, storm drainage, grading and erosion control, and other utility plans must be reviewed and approved by the city engineer and the public works director.
B. 
Fire lines and fire hydrants including placement, size and type, and proposed water pressure shall be reviewed and approved by the Rogue River rural fire marshal.
C. 
Water system design shall conform to the adopted water plan, official water system map, and the city of Rogue River water standards.
D. 
Sewer system design shall conform to the adopted sewer plan, official sewer system map, and shall be approved by the Department of Environmental Quality.
E. 
Storm drain and drainway design shall be consistent with the city's master storm drainage facilities plan and official storm drainage map, shall take into account the capacity and grade necessary to maintain unrestricted flow from areas draining through the use or development, and to allow extension of the system outside the use or development.
F. 
Grants Pass Irrigation District and/or Gold Hill Irrigation District shall be consulted regarding any improvements on the property in which they have an interest.
G. 
All utilities shall be placed underground. The applicant shall make necessary arrangements with the utility companies or other persons or corporations affected for the installation of underground lines and facilities.
H. 
Construction document submittal and review, construction acceptance and bonding for completion and maintenance, fees, assessments and system development charges shall be per Chapter 16.25 RRMC.
(Formerly 16.35.140; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.250; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
Approval of the tentative plan does not constitute final acceptance of the final plat, although such approval is binding for purposes of the preparation of the final plat. As a result of final plat review, the city may require changes in the final plat as are necessary for compliance with the terms of the city approval of the tentative plan. This provision allows the subdivider to proceed with the project including final plat preparation and actual construction with some assurance and gives assurance to the city that the final plat will be in substantial conformance with the approved tentative plan and with the development conditions of approval.
(Formerly 16.35.150; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.410; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
Final plat review shall be in accordance to Type II procedure as provided in RRMC § 16.10.040, Procedure schedule. PUD final plats shall require a preapplication conference per Article III of Chapter 16.10 RRMC and a complete application determination per Article IV of Chapter 16.10 RRMC prior to proceeding with the review of the final plat.
(Formerly 16.35.160; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.420; Ord. 23-418-O § 108; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The final plat must be in substantial conformance with the tentative plan, as defined in this title. Within 14 days of receipt of the final plat, the city administrator shall determine whether the final plat substantially conforms to the approved tentative plan. The 120-day period shall be measured from the date the final plat application is determined to be complete. For this reason, final plats that are in substantial conformance have a lesser degree of review at the final plat stage than the tentative plan stage. The term "substantial conformance" shall mean, in the opinion of the director of public works, at a minimum, that the final plat:
A. 
Conforms with the approved tentative plan and the development conditions of approval of the tentative plan by the review body;
B. 
Conforms with the city standards of design and construction, or those deviations specifically approved as part of the approved tentative plan, as embodied in the approved construction documents, including those change orders approved in writing by the director of public works;
C. 
Conforms with the approved master plan street and utility requirements, if any; and
D. 
Has resulted in no additional lots, dwelling units, or buildings created, other than as approved in the tentative plan by the review body.
(Formerly 16.35.170; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.430; Ord. 23-418-O § 109; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
Within 120 days of application, the city planner shall determine the final plat's completeness and compliance with the tentative plan approval. An amendment application, including planning commission and city council review, will be required if the final plat does not substantially conform to the approved tentative plan.
(Formerly 16.35.180; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.440; Ord. 23-418-O § 110; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
After receiving the PUD tentative plan approval, the developer shall have prepared a final plat. The final plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, shall be a minimum of 18 inches by 24 inches with a one-inch margin and shall contain:
A. 
All requirements of ORS 209.250 and ORS Chapter 92, and any other applicable state or federal regulations.
B. 
Any dedications or changes required as part of tentative plan approval.
C. 
A future development plan, when required, including a note stating that development of the property is subject to the conditions of such plan.
D. 
Any tentative plan notes, restrictions, notices and special conditions that were required to be placed on the final plat as part of tentative plan approval. The review body shall not require that the final plat show graphically any information or requirement that is or may be subject to administrative change or variance.
E. 
A letter from the responsible engineer stating that the engineer had supervised the grading and the construction of the entire parcel and the individual lots, and stating that the grading and construction were completed according to the approved plans.
F. 
As a separate document, a land division guarantee from a title company.
(Formerly 16.35.190; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.510; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The signatures required on a PUD final plat shall be as follows:
A. 
The surveyor who prepared the plat, the property owner(s), and all other parties required to sign under ORS Chapter 92 shall sign the plan.
B. 
The county surveyor, verifying compliance with applicable survey laws for the state of Oregon.
C. 
The city administrator, verifying all city financial obligations on the property have been met.
D. 
The public works director, verifying that the final plat is in conformance with the approved tentative plan, that all tentative plan approval conditions have been met, and that the letter from the responsible engineer certifying grading and construction according to approved plans has been received.
E. 
The director of any special district shown on the final plat or any official required by law to provide certifications.
F. 
The Jackson County board of county commissioners' chair.
G. 
The county assessor, certifying that all taxes on the property have been paid or bonded for in accordance with state law.
(Formerly 16.35.200; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.520; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The applicant shall file the approved original PUD final plat as per ORS Chapter 92. After recording, the applicant shall also file one print with the city administrator, bearing the county clerk's received stamp and the recording number.
(Formerly 16.35.210; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.530; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)
The approved final plat shall become null and void if not filed and recorded with the county clerk within 30 days of final approval by the city. The date of final approval by the city shall be the effective date following the final action by the city review body and the appeal period per Article II of Chapter 16.10 RRMC.
(Formerly 16.35.220; Ord. 11-373-O § 8-7:7.540; Ord. 25-442-O § 1)