A. Competitive sealed proposals. If the purchasing officer determines that use of competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous, the municipality may procure supplies, professional services, general services or construction by competitive sealed proposals under this section.
B. Requests for proposals (RFPs). The purchasing officer shall solicit competitive sealed proposals by issuing a request for proposals. The request for proposals shall state, or incorporate by reference, all specifications and contractual terms and conditions to which a proposal must respond, the factors to be considered in evaluating proposals, the relative importance of those factors, and the manner and time limits for submitting proposals. Public notice of a request for proposals shall be given in accordance with section
7.20.020B. One or more pre-proposal conferences may be held in accordance with section
7.20.020C. A request for proposals may be modified or interpreted only in the manner provided in section
7.20.020C.
C. Proposal submission. The purchasing officer shall require proposals to be submitted electronically or by means of sealed envelopes. If the purchasing officer accepts proposals by means of sealed envelopes, they shall be designated as such and shall be submitted in the manner required and no later than the time specified in the request for proposals. Proposals submitted by sealed envelope that are not submitted in the manner required or within the time specified in the request for proposals shall not be opened or considered. Proposals submitted electronically shall be submitted as specified and no later than the time specified in the request for proposals. Proposals submitted electronically that are not received by the means and time specified in the request for proposals shall not be opened or considered.
D. Opening proposals; pre-award confidentiality. Proposals shall be opened so as to avoid disclosing their contents to competing proposers during the evaluation, discussion, and negotiation process. Notwithstanding chapter
3.90, the names of the responding firms, contents of the proposals, tabulations and evaluations thereof shall be open to public inspection only after assembly approval of a contract award, except that the names of responding firms may be reported to the assembly. However, the purchasing officer shall issue a notice of intent to award to all responding proposers at least seven days prior to assembly approval. Upon request by a competing proposer, the recommended awardee's proposal shall be opened for review. The review by a competing proposer is to assure reasonable access and opportunity to request a debriefing from the purchasing officer prior to assembly action on the proposed award. If an award does not require assembly approval, public inspection shall be allowed for a period of seven days after the purchasing officer has issued a notice of intent to award, after which, if there are no pending reviews or actions from any competing proposer, award may be made.
E. Negotiations with short-listed proposers. In the manner provided in the request for proposals, the purchasing officer may enter into discussions with those responsible proposers whose proposals are determined by the purchasing officer to be most reasonably responsive to the request for proposals (short-listed firms). The purchasing officer may issue an interim notice to the remaining firms that a qualified list has been established for discussion purposes. No disclosure of the short-listed firms, contents of proposals, tabulations or evaluations thereof shall be made in accordance subsection
D above. Discussions shall be used to clarify and ensure full understanding of the requirements of the request for proposals. The purchasing officer may permit those short-listed firms to revise their proposals after submission and prior to award to obtain best and final offers. Proposers deemed eligible for discussions shall be treated equally regarding any opportunity to discuss and revise proposals. However, if during the discussions it is evident that the proposals, as submitted, will exceed the available funding, and/or other changes in the terms, conditions, or requirements are needed to clarify or fulfill the requirements of the municipality, the purchasing officer shall issue a written modification to those short-listed firms with an established date and time for the firms to respond. The failure of a short-listed firm to respond or to notify the purchasing officer of a needed time extension may be just cause to remove the proposer from further consideration. In conducting discussions or requesting revisions, neither the purchasing officer nor any other municipal officer or employee shall disclose any information derived from other competing proposals.
F. Award after negotiation. If fair and reasonable compensation, contract requirements and contract documents can be agreed upon with the most qualified proposer (or, in the case where an award is to be made to more than one proposer, to the most qualified proposers), the contract shall be awarded to the most qualified proposer (or proposers).
G. Failure to come to terms. If fair and reasonable compensation, contract requirements and contract documents cannot be agreed upon with the most qualified proposer, the purchasing officer shall advise the proposer of the termination of negotiations. If the proposals were submitted by one or more other proposers determined to be qualified, negotiations may be conducted with such other proposers in the order of their respective rankings. The contract may be awarded to the proposer then determined to be most advantageous to the municipality.
H. Written notice of award. Awards shall be made by written notice to the proposer whose final proposal is determined to be most advantageous to the municipality. No criteria other than those set forth in the request for proposals may be used in proposal evaluation. If the mayor determines that it is in the best interest of the municipality to do so, the municipality may reject all proposals.
I. Consideration of costs. When the service is routine and repetitious, costs of the anticipated service shall be considered during evaluation of proposals. This subsection shall not apply to a qualifications-based selection process.
1. When the source selection is for architectural and/or engineering services, (herein A/E services) a qualifications-based selection process shall be used. Price will not be a factor in the selection of the architect or engineer during the evaluation process.
2. Notwithstanding subsection
I.1 of this section, the purchasing officer may include price as an added factor in selecting architectural and engineering services when, in the judgment of the purchasing officer, the services required are repetitious in nature, and the scope, nature, and amount of services required are thoroughly defined by measurable and objective standards to reasonably enable proposers to compete with a clear understanding and interpretation of the services required.
a. In order to include price as a factor in selection of architectural and engineering services, a majority of the persons involved by the purchasing officer in evaluating the proposals must be registered in the state to perform architectural or engineering services.
3. Subsections
I.1 and
I.2 of this section do not apply to a design/build contract.
4. Except as otherwise required by state law in particular situations, this section shall apply to all procurements of architectural and engineering services by the municipality.
(AO No. 79-203, 1-1-1980; AO No. 88-163; AO No. 92-82(S), 1-1-1993; AO No. 92-87(S); AO No. 94-174, § 1, 10-25-1964; AO No. 2001-122(S-1), § 5, 7-24-2001; AO No. 2007-22, § 2, 2-27-2007; AO No. 2023-56(S), § 1, 5-9-2023; AO No. 2024-36(S), § 4, 4-23-2024; AO No. 2025-37, § 15, 5-16-2025)