A. 
Location of utility poles near the edge of the right-of-way should be considered.
B. 
Breakaway designs for traffic-control devices and lighting should not be used where the falling object could create a hazard to pedestrian traffic.
C. 
Where edge of right-of-way locations are not feasible for utilities, it is desirable that all trees, utility supports, etc., be placed a uniform distance from the curb. Clearance to trees should account for estimated trunk diameter at maturity.
(Ord. 483 § 4.2(1), 1980)
Except as noted under SMC § 12.16.390, where applicable, local standards for utility locations such as the Snoqualmie Ridge Phase 2 Standards govern in lieu of the location requirements of this chapter.
(Ord. 483 § 4.2(2), 1980; Ord. 1198 § 6, 2017)
Flashing-light signals which indicate the approach or presence of trains should be installed at those railroad-highway grade crossings where studies by qualified engineers indicate the need of warning beyond that provided by signs and markings.
(Ord. 483 § 4.2(3), 1980)
If existing conditions do not allow the construction of a street to the minimum width, consideration should be given to removing the parking lanes and constructing strategically located parking lots.
(Ord. 483 § 4.2(5), 1980)
A. 
Guardrail installation should be considered to protect vehicle occupants where roadside obstacles cannot be removed or designed to yield upon impact.
B. 
Supports for traffic-control devices and lighting, including mast arm or span wires, should be designed to yield or break away under impact unless the breakaway design will endanger pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
C. 
Guardrails or other design features which protect people from out-of-control vehicles at locations such as playgrounds, schoolyards, and commercial areas should be considered.
D. 
Bridge rail designs which minimize the severity of impact and retain or redirect the encroaching vehicle should be considered.
(Ord. 483 § 4.2(6), 1980)