[Ord. 10-1241B, § 5]
A. 
Each city and county shall update its TSP to incorporate regional and state transportation needs identified in the 2035 RTP and its own transportation needs. The determination of local transportation needs shall be based upon:
1. 
System gaps and deficiencies identified in the inventories and analysis of transportation systems pursuant to Title 1;
2. 
Identification of facilities that exceed the Deficiency Thresholds and Operating Standards in Table 3.08-2 or the alternative thresholds and standards established pursuant to section 3.08.230;
3. 
Consideration and documentation of the needs of youth, seniors, people with disabilities and environmental justice populations within the city or county, including minorities and low-income families.
B. 
A city or county determination of transportation needs must be consistent with the following elements of the RTP:
1. 
The population and employment forecast and planning period of the RTP, except that a city or county may use an alternative forecast for the city or county, coordinated with Metro, to account for changes to comprehensive plan or land use regulations adopted after adoption of the RTP;
2. 
System maps and functional classifications for street design, motor vehicles, transit, bicycles, pedestrians and freight in Chapter 2 of the RTP; and
3. 
Regional non-SOV modal targets in Table 3.08-1 and the Deficiency Thresholds and Operating Standards in Table 3.08-2.
C. 
When determining its transportation needs under this section, a city or county shall consider the regional needs identified in the mobility corridor strategies in Chapter 4 of the RTP.
[Ord. 10-1241B, § 5]
A. 
Each city and county shall consider the following strategies, in the order listed, to meet the transportation needs determined pursuant to section 3.08.210 and performance targets and standards pursuant to section 3.08.230. The city or county shall explain its choice of one or more of the strategies and why other strategies were not chosen:
1. 
TSMO strategies, including localized TDM, safety, operational and access management improvements;
2. 
Transit, bicycle and pedestrian system improvements;
3. 
Traffic-calming designs and devices;
4. 
Land use strategies in OAR 660-012-0035(2) to help achieve the thresholds and standards in Tables 3.08-1 and 3.08-2 or alternative thresholds and standards established pursuant to section 3.08.230;
5. 
Connectivity improvements to provide parallel arterials, collectors or local streets that include pedestrian and bicycle facilities, consistent with the connectivity standards in section 3.08.110 and design classifications in Table 2.6 of the RTP, in order to provide alternative routes and encourage walking, biking and access to transit; and
6. 
Motor vehicle capacity improvements, consistent with the RTP Arterial and Throughway Design and Network Concepts in Table 2.6 and section 2.5.2 of the RTP, only upon a demonstration that other strategies in this subsection are not appropriate or cannot adequately address identified transportation needs.
B. 
A city or county shall coordinate its consideration of the strategies in subsection A with the owner of the transportation facility affected by the strategy. Facility design is subject to the approval of the facility owner.
C. 
If analysis under § 3.08.210A indicates a new regional or state need that has not been identified in the RTP, the city or county may propose one of the following actions:
1. 
Propose a project at the time of Metro review of the TSP to be incorporated into the RTP during the next RTP update; or
2. 
Propose an amendment to the RTP for needs and projects if the amendment is necessary prior to the next RTP update.
[Ord. 10-1241B, § 5]
A. 
Each city and county shall demonstrate that solutions adopted pursuant to section 3.08.220 will achieve progress toward the targets and standards in Tables 3.08-1, and 3.08-2 and measures in subsection D, or toward alternative targets and standards adopted by the city or county pursuant to subsections B and, C. The city or county shall include the regional targets and standards or its alternatives in its TSP.
B. 
A city or county may adopt alternative targets or standards in place of the regional targets and standards prescribed in subsection A upon a demonstration that the alternative targets or standards:
1. 
Are no lower than the modal targets in Table 3.08-1 and no lower than the ratios in Table 3.08-2;
2. 
Will not result in a need for motor vehicle capacity improvements that go beyond the planned arterial and throughway network defined in Figure 2.12 of the RTP and that are not recommended in, or are inconsistent with, the RTP; and
3. 
Will not increase SOV travel to a degree inconsistent with the non-SOV modal targets in Table 3.08-1.
C. 
If the city or county adopts mobility standards for state highways different from those in Table 3.08-2, it shall demonstrate that the standards have been approved by the Oregon Transportation Commission.
D. 
Each city and county shall also include performance measures for safety, vehicle miles traveled per capita, freight reliability, congestion, and walking, bicycling and transit mode shares to evaluate and monitor performance of the TSP.
E. 
To demonstrate progress toward achievement of performance targets in Tables 3.08-1 and 3.08-2 and to improve performance of state highways within its jurisdiction as much as feasible and avoid their further degradation, the city or county shall adopt the following:
1. 
Parking minimum and maximum ratios in Centers and Station Communities consistent with § 3.08.410A;
2. 
Designs for street, transit, bicycle, freight and pedestrian systems consistent with Title 1; and
3. 
TSMO projects and strategies consistent with section 3.08.160; and
4. 
Land use actions pursuant to OAR 660-012-0035(2).