A. Purpose and scope. The variance process is intended to provide limited relief from the requirements of this title in those cases where strict application of a particular requirement will create a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship prohibiting the reasonable use of land in a manner otherwise allowed under this title. It is not intended that variances be granted merely to remove inconveniences or financial burdens that the requirements of this title may impose on property owners in general. Rather, it is intended to provide relief where the requirements of this title render the land difficult or impossible to use because of some unique physical attribute of the property itself. State and/or federal laws or requirements may not be varied by the municipality. Variances are not intended to allow things that are otherwise prohibited in this title.
B. Decision-making bodies for variance requests.
1. The platting authority shall be authorized to review and decide all requests for variances to standards of the following sections:
c. Chapter
21.08, Subdivision Standards;
2. Requests for variances from the airport height regulations set forth in section
21.06.030D.9 shall be referred to the Federal Aviation Administration.
3. The planning and zoning commission shall be authorized to review and decide all requests for variances to standards of the following sections:
a. District-specific standards of Chapter
21.04, Zoning Districts, Section
21.09.040, Zoning Districts (Girdwood), and Section
21.10.040, Zoning Districts (Chugiak-Eagle River);
b. Use-specific standards of Chapter
21.05, Use Regulations (except Section
21.05.040K, telecommunication facilities, and Section
21.05.055, Marijuana Establishments), Section
21.09.050, Use Regulations, and Section
21.10.050, Use Regulations;
c. Chapter
21.07, Development and Design Standards (except Section
21.07.020B, watercourse, water body, and wetland protection, Section
21.07.020C, steep slope development, Section
21.07.050, utility distribution facilities, and Section
21.07.060, Transportation and Connectivity);
d. Those subsections of Section
21.09.070 that are not reserved to the platting authority or the zoning board of examiners and appeals;
f. Section
21.10.070, Development and Design Standards (Chugiak-Eagle River) (except Section
21.10.070B, Transportation and Connectivity);
g. Section
21.11.070, Development and Design Standards (Downtown); and
h. Chapter
21.12, Signs, including the maximum sign area, the maximum sign height, the location of the sign, and the number of signs on the parcel.
4. The zoning board of examiners and appeals shall be authorized to review and decide all requests for variances to standards of the following sections:
b. Chapter
21.06, Dimensional Standards and Measurements (except section
21.06.030D.9, airport height regulations);
c. Section
21.07.020B, watercourse, water body, and wetland protection;
f. Section
21.09.070J, utilities and utility equipment standards;
The zoning board may only grant variances from dimensional standards.
5. No variance may be granted from the definitions set forth in Chapter
21.15.
C. Application submittal. Applications for a variance shall be submitted to the director on a form provided by the department and shall be accompanied by the information specified on the application form.
D. Public notice. Notice shall be provided in accordance with Section
21.03.020H.
E. Departmental review. The department shall review each proposed variance in light of the approval criteria of subsection
G below and distribute to other reviewers as deemed necessary. Based on the results of those reviews, the department shall provide a report to the decision-making body.
F. Action by the decision-making body.
1. Once the application is complete, the director shall schedule the application for consideration at a public hearing, and shall transmit to the appropriate decision-making body all applications and other records pertaining to the variance prior to the hearing. Upon receiving the application materials from the director, the decision-making body shall hold a public hearing on the proposed variance.
2. In considering the application, the decision-making body shall review the application materials, the approval criteria of subsection
G, and all testimony and evidence received at the public hearing.
3. After conducting the public hearing, the decision-making body may: deny the application; conduct an additional public hearing on the application; or grant the minimum required variance. Any approval or denial of the request shall be by resolution, accompanied by written findings of fact that the variance meets or does not meet each of the applicable criteria set forth in subsection
G, stating the reasons for such findings. A concurring vote of a majority of the fully constituted membership of the entity, minus those excused by conflicts of interest, shall be required to grant a variance.
4. Under no circumstances shall the decision-making body grant a variance to allow a use not permitted in the zoning district containing the property for which the variance is sought.
5. Under no circumstances shall the decision-making body grant a variance from any written conditions attached by another decision-making body to the approval of a conditional use, subdivision plat, site plan, or rezone (special limitation).
G. Approval criteria. The application must state with particularity the relief sought and must specify the facts or circumstances that are alleged to show that the application substantially meets the following standards:
1. Approval criteria for variances decided by the planning and zoning commission.
a. The proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
b. The proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
c. The proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard;
d. The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the use of adjacent property as permitted under this code;
e. The variance, if granted, does not change the character of the zoning district where the property is located, is in keeping with the intent of the code, and does not permit a use not otherwise permitted in the district in which the property lies;
f. Persons with disabilities are provided with access as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and reasonable accommodation;
g. The variance, if granted, does not adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the municipality; and
h. In evaluating the request for a variance to the maximum sign height, the planning and zoning commission may consider whether there are special topographic circumstances that would result in a material impairment of visibility of the sign from the adjacent roadway which significantly diminishes the owner's or user's ability to continue to communicate adequately and effectively with the public through the use of the sign.
2. Approval criteria for variances decided by the zoning board of examiners and appeals.
a. There exist exceptional or extraordinary physical circumstances of the subject property including, but not limited to, streams, wetlands, or slope, and those circumstances are not applicable to other land in the same zoning district;
b. Because of these physical circumstances, the strict application of the code creates an exceptional or undue hardship upon the property owner, and would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the zoning ordinance;
c. The hardship is not self-imposed, special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant, and such conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute inconvenience;
d. The variance, if granted, will not adversely affect the use of adjacent property as permitted under this code;
e. The variance, if granted, does not change the character of the zoning district where the property is located, is in keeping with the intent of the code, and does not permit a use not otherwise permitted in the district in which the property lies;
f. The variance, if granted, does not adversely affect the health, safety, and welfare of the people of the municipality;
g. Persons with disabilities are provided with access as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and reasonable accommodation; and
h. The variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible a reasonable use of the land.
3. Approval criteria for variances decided by the platting authority.
a. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of the subdivision regulations would clearly be impractical, unreasonable, or undesirable to the general public;
b. The granting of the specific variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area in which such property is situated;
c. Such variance will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations or the comprehensive plan of the municipality; and
d. Undue hardship would result from strict compliance with specific provisions or requirements of the subdivision regulations. The applicant may supplement the form with supporting documents.
4. Variances from airport height regulations. The Federal Aviation Administration shall complete an airspace determination that concludes that the proposed variance would not create a hazard.
H. Lapse of approval. Any variance granted shall become null and void if:
1. The variance is not exercised within one year of the date it is granted or as otherwise conditioned, or
2. Any building, structure, or characteristic of use permitted by variance is moved or altered so as to enlarge the variance or discontinue it.
I. Appeals.
1. An appeal from a decision of the platting authority shall be brought to the board of adjustment in accordance with Section
21.03.050A.
2. An appeal from a decision of the zoning board of examiners and appeals shall be brought in accordance with Section
21.03.050D.
J. Administrative variances.
1. Process
a. Application submittal. Applications for a variance shall be submitted to the director on a form provided by the department and shall contain the information specified on the application form.
b. Notice. Notice shall be provided in accordance with Section
21.03.020H.
c. Time for approval. The director shall make a determination on an application within 45 days of submittal, and shall provide written findings of the decision. Notification of approval or denial shall be posted electronically on the department's municipal web site and furnished in writing to the applicant by mail or delivered by electronic means.
d. Appeals. If the request for an administrative variance is denied, the applicant may apply for a public hearing variance before the planning and zoning commission under this Section
21.03.240. Additionally, denial of requests for reasonable accommodation may be appealed by any person with standing to request reasonable accommodation under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §
3604(f).
2. Reasonable accommodation.
a. Intent. The intent of this section is to provide a procedure to allow persons with disabilities and assisted living providers to request reasonable accommodation from the department in accordance with 42 U.S.C.
3604(f)(3)(B).
b. Standards. In deciding to approve or deny an application, the department shall review the application and written comments addressing factors relevant to the request for reasonable accommodation, including but not limited to, the extent to which the application demonstrates the following, as related to the particular request of the applicant:
i. Whether the requested accommodation is implementing safety measures specific to the needs of the residents, including but not limited to safety measures in state law and regulation, and in municipal fire code adopted under Title
23.
ii. Whether the accommodation requested is advancing housing opportunities for disabled individuals in a residential community without jeopardizing residential aspects of the neighborhood.
iii. Whether the requested accommodation is necessary to comply with the provisions of the federal Fair Housing Act.
iv. External characteristics and impacts of the proposed accommodation, including without limitation appearance, projected contribution to traffic volumes and on-street parking within the neighborhood, available street lighting, and sidewalks.
v. Quantifiable risks to the health, safety, and quality of life of area residents and users.
vi. Administrative and economic burden on the municipality, in either approval or denial of the variance.
vii. Other factors deemed relevant to the applicant or the department in review of the application.
c. Conditions. In approving a variance, the department may impose reasonable conditions designed to address the standards in subsection
J.2.b or mitigate impacts created by the variance.
3. For signs. The director may grant an administrative variance from the height restrictions and/or setback requirements for freestanding signs, provided:
a. Special topographic circumstances exist that would result in a material impairment of visibility of a conforming sign from the adjacent roadway;
b. There is no reasonable conforming alternative to the variance; and
c. Any setback variance does not result in an encroachment into a public right-of-way.
4. For large domestic animal facility. Application for administrative approval of deviation in minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet may be made to the department. The director may approve deviation of site area square footage, not to exceed ten percent, upon consultation with the Anchorage Health Department.
5. For refuse receptacle location and screening.
a. The director shall seek and document comments from the applicable refuse service providers.
b. Approval criteria for this administrative variance is listed in Section
21.07.080G.2.h.
6. For height encroachments into step-backs and step-back planes. The director may grant an administrative variance from height/bulk transition requirements including building height step-back planes or limitations on building elevation length in Chapter
21.06, provided:
a. There exist physical circumstances of the subject property such as topography or exceptional lot configuration not shared by landowners in general;
b. Because of these physical circumstances, the strict application of the height/bulk transition or step-back plane would create an exceptional or undue hardship upon the property owner, and would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the zoning ordinance;
c. The hardship is not self-imposed, the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant, and such conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute inconvenience; and
d. The administrative variance granted is the minimum deviation or encroachment necessary to address the hardship and development rights, and will cause the least interference possible with the intended solar access protections.
(AO 2012-124(S), 2-26-2013; AO 2013-117, 12-3-2013; AO No. 2015-36, § 10, 5-14-2015; AO No. 2015-133(S), § 2, 2-23-2016; AO No. 2017-55, § 7, 4-11-2017; AO No. 2018-67(S-1), § 4, 10-9-2018; AO No. 2018-118, § 2, 1-1-2019; AO No. 2020-38, § 3, 5-28-2020; AO No. 2021-89(S), § 21, 2-15-2022; AO No. 2022-36, § 1, 4-26-2022; AO No. 2022-38, § 3, 4-12-2022; AO No. 2023-50, § 1, 7-11-2023, eff. 1-1-2024; AO No. 2023-120, § 4, 12-5-2023; AO No. 2024-24, § 1, 4-23-2024; AO No. 2025-64, § 1, 6-10-2025; AO No. 2026-46 Amended, 4-28-2026)