The city council finds that:
A. 
The protection, enhancement, perpetuation and use of buildings, sites, districts, structures and objects of historical, cultural, architectural, engineering, geographic, ethnic and archaeological significance located in Kenmore is necessary in the interest of the prosperity, civic pride and general welfare of the people of Kenmore.
B. 
Such cultural and historic resources are a significant part of the heritage, education and economic base of Kenmore, and the economic, cultural and aesthetic well-being of Kenmore cannot be maintained or enhanced by disregarding its heritage and by allowing the unnecessary destruction or defacement of such resources.
C. 
Present preservation programs and activities are inadequate for insuring present and future generations of Kenmore residents and visitors a genuine opportunity to appreciate and enjoy our heritage.
D. 
The purposes of this chapter are to:
1. 
Designate, preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate those sites, buildings, districts, structures and objects which reflect a significant element of the cultural, aesthetic, social, economic, political, architectural, ethnic, archaeological, engineering, historic and other heritage of Kenmore, the county, State and nation;
2. 
Foster civic pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past;
3. 
Stabilize and improve the economic values and vitality of landmarks;
4. 
Protect and enhance Kenmore's tourist industry by promoting heritage-related tourism;
5. 
Promote the continued use, exhibition and interpretation of significant sites, districts, buildings, structures, and objects for the education, inspiration and welfare of the people of Kenmore;
6. 
Promote and continue incentives for ownership and utilization of landmarks;
7. 
Assist, encourage and provide incentives to public and private owners for preservation, restoration, rehabilitation and use of landmark buildings, sites, districts, structures and objects;
8. 
Work cooperatively with other jurisdictions to identify, evaluate and protect historic resources in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 1)
A. 
The King County landmarks and heritage commission established pursuant to Chapter 20.62 of the King County Code is hereby designated and empowered to act as the landmarks commission for Kenmore, pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
B. 
The special member of the King County landmarks and heritage commission provided for in Section 20.62.030 of the King County Code shall be appointed for a three-year term by the mayor, subject to confirmation of the city council. Such special member shall be appointed based on a demonstrated interest and competence in historic preservation. The special member shall serve until his or her successor is duly appointed and confirmed. In the event of a vacancy, an appointment shall be made to fill the vacancy in the manner set forth in this section, and the person appointed to fill the vacancy shall hold the position for the remainder of the unexpired term. Such special member may be reappointed, but may not serve more than two consecutive three-year terms. The special member shall be deemed to have served one full term if he or she resigns at any time after his or her appointment, or if the special member serves more than two years of an unexpired term. The special members of the commission shall serve without compensation except for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with commission meetings or programs, which expenses shall be reimbursed by the City of Kenmore.
C. 
The commission shall not conduct any public hearings required under this chapter with respect to properties located within the City of Kenmore until the commission's rules, regulations and procedures, consistent with this chapter, have been filed with the city clerk.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 2)
The following words and terms shall, when used in this chapter, be defined as follows unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
A. 
“Alteration”
is any construction, demolition, removal, modification, excavation, restoration or remodeling of a landmark.
B. 
“Building”
is a structure created to shelter any form of human activity, such as a house, barn, church, hotel, or similar structure. Building may refer to an historically related complex, such as a courthouse and jail or a house and barn.
C. 
“Certificate of appropriateness”
is written authorization issued by the commission or its designee permitting an alteration to a significant feature of a designated landmark.
D. 
“Commission”
is the landmarks and heritage commission created by this chapter.
E. 
“Community landmark”
is an historic resource which has been designated pursuant to KMC § 2.20.040 but which may be altered or changed without application for or approval of a certificate of appropriateness.
F. 
“Council”
is the Kenmore city council.
G. 
“Designation”
is the act of the commission determining that an historic resource meets the criteria established by this chapter.
H. 
“Designation report”
is a report issued by the commission after a public hearing setting forth its determination to designate a landmark and specifying the significant feature or features thereof.
I. 
“Director” or “manager”
is the person or officer who approves building permits for the City, or his or her designee.
J. 
“District”
is a geographically definable area, urban or rural, possessing a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united by past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development. A district may also comprise individual elements separated geographically but linked by association or history.
K. 
“Heritage”
is a discipline relating to history, ethnic history, traditional cultures, folklore, archaeology and historic preservation.
L. 
“Historic preservation officer”
is the City of Kenmore historic preservation officer or his or her designee.
M. 
“Historic resource”
is a district, site, building, structure or object significant in national, State or local history, architecture, archaeology, and culture.
N. 
“Historic resource inventory”
is an organized compilation of information on historic resources considered to be significant according to the criteria listed in KMC § 2.20.040(A). The historic resource inventory is kept on file by the historic preservation officer and is updated from time to time to include newly eligible resources and to reflect changes to resources.
O. 
“Incentives”
are such compensation, rights or privileges, or combination thereof, which the council, or other local, State or federal public body or agency, by virtue of applicable present or future legislation, may be authorized to grant to or obtain for the owner(s) of designated landmarks. Examples of economic incentives include but are not limited to tax relief, conditional use permits, rezoning, street vacation, planned unit development, transfer of development rights, facade easements, gifts, preferential leasing policies, private or public grants-in-aid, beneficial placement of public improvements, or amenities, or the like.
P. 
“Interested person of record”
is any individual, corporation, partnership or association which notifies the commission or the council in writing of its interest in any matter before the commission.
Q. 
“Landmark”
is an historic resource designated as a landmark pursuant to KMC § 2.20.060.
R. 
“Nomination”
is a proposal that an historic resource be designated a landmark.
S. 
“Object”
is a material thing of functional, aesthetic, cultural, historical, or scientific value that may be, by nature or design, movable yet related to a specific setting or environment.
T. 
“Owner”
is a person having a fee simple interest, a substantial beneficial interest of record or a substantial beneficial interest known to the commission in an historic resource. Where the owner is a public agency or government, that agency shall specify the person or persons to receive notices hereunder.
U. 
“Person”
is any individual, partnership, corporation, group or association.
V. 
“Person in charge”
is the person or persons in possession of a landmark including, but not limited to, a mortgagee or vendee in possession, an assignee of rents, a receiver, executor, trustee, lessee, tenant, agent, or any other person directly or indirectly in control of the landmark.
W. 
“Preliminary determination”
is a decision of the commission determining that an historic resource which has been nominated for designation is of significant value and is likely to satisfy the criteria for designation.
X. 
“Significant feature”
is any element of a landmark which the commission has designated pursuant to this chapter as of importance to the historic, architectural or archaeological value of the landmark.
Y. 
“Site”
is the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself maintains an historical or archaeological value regardless of the value of any existing structures.
Z. 
“Structure”
is any functional construction made usually for purposes other than creating human shelter.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(A) (KCC 20.62.020))
A. 
An historic resource may be designated as a City of Kenmore landmark if it is more than 40 years old or, in the case of a landmark district, contains resources that are more than 40 years old, and possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association, and:
1. 
Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, State or local history; or
2. 
Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, State or local history; or
3. 
Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction, or that represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
4. 
Has yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history; or
5. 
Is an outstanding work of a designer or builder who has made a substantial contribution to the art.
B. 
An historic resource may be designated a community landmark because it is an easily identifiable visual feature of a neighborhood or the City and contributes to the distinctive quality or identity of such neighborhood or City or because of its association with significant historical events or historic themes, association with important or prominent persons in the community or City, or recognition by local citizens for substantial contribution to the neighborhood or community. An improvement or site qualifying for designation solely by virtue of satisfying criteria set out in this section shall be designated a community landmark and shall not be subject to the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070.
C. 
Cemeteries, birthplaces, or graves of historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, structures that have been moved from their original locations, reconstructed historic buildings, properties primarily commemorative in nature, and properties that have achieved significance within the past 40 years shall not be considered eligible for designation. However, such a property shall be eligible for designation if they are an integral part of districts that meet the criteria set out in subsection (A) of this section or if it is:
1. 
A religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or
2. 
A building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for its architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or
3. 
A birthplace, grave or residence of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no other appropriate site or building directly associated with his or her productive life; or
4. 
A cemetery that derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events; or
5. 
A reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner or as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or
6. 
A property commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own historical significance; or
7. 
A property achieving significance within the past 40 years if it is of exceptional importance.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(B) (KCC 20.62.040))
A. 
Any person, including the historic preservation officer and any member of the commission, may nominate an historic resource for designation as a landmark or community landmark. The procedures set forth in this section and KMC § 2.20.070 may be used to amend existing designations or to terminate an existing designation based on changes which affect the applicability of the criteria for designation set forth in KMC § 2.20.040. The nomination or designation of an historic resource as a landmark shall constitute nomination or designation of the land which is occupied by the historic resource unless the nomination provides otherwise. Nominations shall be made on official nomination forms provided by the historic preservation officer shall be filed with the historic preservation officer, and shall include all data required by the commission.
B. 
Upon receipt by the historic preservation officer of any nomination for designation, the officer shall review the nomination, consult with the person or persons submitting the nomination, and the owner, and prepare any amendments to or additional information on the nomination deemed necessary by the officer. The historic preservation officer may refuse to accept any nomination for which inadequate information is provided by the person or persons submitting the nomination. It is the responsibility of the person or persons submitting the nomination to perform such research as is necessary for consideration by the commission. The historic preservation officer may assume responsibility for gathering the required information or appoint an expert or experts to carry out this research in the interest of expediting the consideration.
C. 
When the historic preservation officer is satisfied that the nomination contains sufficient information and complies with the commission’s regulations for nomination, the officer shall give notice in writing, certified mail/return receipt requested, to the owner of the property or object, to the person submitting the nomination and interested persons of record that a preliminary or a designation determination on the nomination will be made by the commission. The notice shall include:
1. 
The date, time, and place of hearing;
2. 
The address and description of the historic resource and the boundaries of the nominated resource;
3. 
A statement that, upon a designation or upon a preliminary determination of significance, the certificate of appropriateness procedure set out in KMC § 2.20.070 will apply;
4. 
A statement that, upon a designation or a preliminary determination of significance, no significant feature may be changed without first obtaining a certificate of appropriateness from the commission, whether or not a building or other permit is required. A copy of the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070 shall be included with the notice;
5. 
A statement that all proceedings to review the action of the commission at the hearing on a preliminary determination or a designation will be based on the record made at such hearing and that no further right to present evidence on the issue of preliminary determination or designation is afforded pursuant to this chapter.
D. 
The historic preservation officer shall, after mailing the notice required herein, refer the nomination and all supporting information to the commission for consideration on the date specified in the notice. No nomination shall be considered by the commission less than 30 nor more than 45 calendar days after notice setting the hearing date has been mailed except where the historic preservation officer or members of the commission have reason to believe that immediate action is necessary to prevent destruction, demolition or defacing of an historic resource, in which case the notice setting the hearing shall so state.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(C) (KCC 20.62.050))
A. 
The commission may approve, deny, amend or terminate the designation of an historic resource as a landmark or community landmark only after a public hearing. At the designation hearing the commission shall receive evidence and hear argument only on the issues of whether the historic resource meets the criteria for designation of landmarks or community landmarks as specified in KMC § 2.20.040 and merits designation as a landmark or community landmark and the significant features of the landmark. The hearing may be continued from time to time in the discretion of the commission. In the event the hearing is continued, the commission may make a preliminary determination of significance if the commission determines, based on the record before it that the historic resource is of significant value and likely to satisfy the criteria for designation set out in KMC § 2.20.040. Such preliminary determination shall be effective as of the date of the public hearing at which it is made. Where the commission makes a preliminary determination it shall specify the boundaries of the nominated resource, the significant features thereof, and such other description of the historic resource as it deems appropriate. Within five working days after the commission has made a preliminary determination, the historic preservation officer shall file a written notice of such action with the manager and mail copies of the same, certified mail/return receipt requested, to the owner, the person submitting the nomination and interested persons of record. Such notice shall include:
1. 
A copy of the commission’s preliminary determination;
2. 
A statement that while proceedings pursuant to this chapter are pending, or six months from the date of the notice, whichever is shorter, and thereafter if the designation is approved by the commission, the certificate of appropriateness procedures set out in KMC § 2.20.070, a copy of which shall be enclosed, shall apply to the described historic resource whether or not a building or other permit is required. The decision of the commission shall be made after the close of the public hearing or at the next regularly scheduled public meeting of the commission thereafter.
B. 
Whenever the commission approves the designation of an historic resource under consideration for designation as a landmark, it shall, within 14 calendar days of the public meeting at which the decision is made, issue a written designation report which shall include:
1. 
The boundaries of the nominated resource and such other description of the resource sufficient to identify its ownership and location;
2. 
The significant features and such other information concerning the historic resource as the commission deems appropriate;
3. 
Findings of fact and reasons supporting the designation with specific reference to the criteria for designation set forth in KMC § 2.20.040;
4. 
A statement that no significant feature may be changed, whether or not a building or other permit is required, without first obtaining a certificate of appropriateness from the commission pursuant to the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070, a copy of which shall be included in the designation report. This subsection shall not apply to historic resources designated as community landmarks.
C. 
Whenever the commission rejects the nomination of an historic resource under consideration for designation as a landmark, it shall, within 14 calendar days of the public meeting at which the decision is made, issue a written decision including findings of fact and reasons supporting its determination that the criteria set forth in KMC § 2.20.040 have not been met. If an historic resource has been nominated as a landmark and the commission designates such historic resource as a community landmark, such designation shall be treated as a rejection of the nomination for City of Kenmore landmark status and the foregoing requirement for a written decision shall apply. Nothing contained herein shall prevent renominating any historic resource rejected under this subsection as a City of Kenmore landmark at a future time.
D. 
A copy of the commission’s designation report or decision rejecting a nomination shall be delivered or mailed to the owner, to interested persons of record and the director within five working days after it is issued. If the commission rejects the nomination and it has made a preliminary determination of significance with respect to such nomination, it shall include in the notice to the director a statement that the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070 no longer apply to the subject historic resources.
E. 
If the commission approves or amends a landmark designation, the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070 shall apply as approved or amended. A copy of the commission’s designation report or designation amendment shall be filed with the division of records and elections together with a legal description of the designated resource and notification that the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070 and 2.20.100 apply. If the commission terminates the designation of an historic resource, the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070 shall no longer apply to said historic resource.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(D) (KCC 20.62.070))
A. 
At any time after a designation report and notice has been filed with the director and for a period of six months after notice of a preliminary determination of significance has been mailed to the owner and filed with the director, a certificate of appropriateness must be obtained from the commission before any alterations may be made to the significant features of the landmark identified in the preliminary determination report or thereafter in the designation report. The designation report shall supersede the preliminary determination report. This requirement shall apply whether or not the proposed alteration also requires a building or other permit. The requirements of this section shall not apply to any historic resource located within the City of Kenmore, except as provided by applicable interlocal agreement.
B. 
Ordinary repairs and maintenance which do not alter the appearance of a significant feature and do not utilize substitute materials do not require a certificate of appropriateness. Repairs to or replacement of utility systems do not require a certificate of appropriateness; provided, that such work does not alter an exterior significant feature.
C. 
There shall be three types of certificates of appropriateness, as follows:
1. 
Type I, for restorations and major repairs which utilize in-kind materials.
2. 
Type II, for alterations in appearance, replacement of historic materials and new construction.
3. 
Type III, for demolition, moving and excavation of archaeological sites.
D. 
In addition, the commission shall establish and adopt an appeals process concerning Type I decisions made by the historic preservation officer with respect to the applications for certificates of appropriateness.
E. 
The historic preservation officer may approve Type I certificates of appropriateness administratively without public hearing, subject to procedures adopted by the commission. Alternatively the historic preservation officer may refer applications for Type I certificates of appropriateness to the commission for decision. The commission shall adopt an appeals procedure concerning Type I decisions made by the historic preservation officer.
F. 
Type II and III certificates of appropriateness shall be decided by the commission and the following general procedures shall apply to such commission actions:
1. 
Application for a certificate of appropriateness shall be made by filing an application for such certificate with the historic preservation officer on forms provided by the commission.
2. 
If an application is made to the director for a permit for any action which affects a landmark, the director shall promptly refer such application to the historic preservation officer, and such application shall be deemed an application for a certificate of appropriateness if accompanied by the additional information required to apply for such certificate. The director may continue to process such permit application, but shall not issue any such permit until the time has expired for filing with the director the notice of denial of a certificate of appropriateness or a certificate of appropriateness has been issued pursuant to this chapter.
3. 
After the commission has commenced proceedings for the consideration of any application for a certificate of appropriateness by giving notice of a hearing pursuant to subsection (F)(4) of this section, no other application for the same or a similar alteration may be made until such proceedings and all administrative appeals therefrom pursuant to this chapter have been concluded.
4. 
Within 45 calendar days after the filing of an application for a certificate of appropriateness with the commission or the referral of an application to the commission by the director except those decided administratively by the historic preservation officer pursuant to subsection (F)(2) of this section, the commission shall hold a public hearing thereon. The historic preservation officer shall mail notice of the hearing to the owner, the applicant, if the applicant is not the owner, and parties of record at the designation proceedings, not less than 10 calendar days before the date of the hearing. No hearing shall be required if the commission, the owner and the applicant, if the applicant is not the owner, agree in writing to a stipulated certificate approving the requested alterations thereof. This agreement shall be ratified by the commission in a public meeting and reflected in the commission meeting minutes. If the commission grants a certificate of appropriateness, such certificate shall be issued forthwith and the historic preservation officer shall promptly file a copy of such certificate with the director.
5. 
If the commission denies the application for a certificate of appropriateness, in whole or in part, it shall so notify the owner, the person submitting the application and interested persons of record setting forth the reasons why approval of the application is not warranted.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(E) (KCC 20.62.080))
A. 
At the public hearing on any application for a Type II or Type III certificate of appropriateness, or Type I if referred to the commission by the historic preservation officer, the commission shall, when requested by the property owner, consider evidence of the economic impact on the owner of the denial or partial denial of a certificate. In no case may a certificate be denied, in whole or in part, when it is established that the denial or partial denial will, when available incentives are utilized, deprive the owner of a reasonable economic use of the landmark and there is no viable and reasonable alternative which would have less impact on the features of significance specified in the preliminary determination report or the designation report.
B. 
To prove the existence of a condition of unreasonable economic return, the applicant must establish and the commission must find both of the following:
1. 
The landmark is incapable of earning a reasonable economic return without making the alterations proposed. This finding shall be made by considering and the applicant shall submit to the commission evidence establishing each of the following factors:
a. 
The current level of economic return on the landmark as considered in relation to the following:
(1) 
The amount paid for the landmark, the date of purchase, and party from whom purchased, including a description of the relationship, if any, between the owner and the person from whom the landmark was purchased;
(2) 
The annual gross and net income, if any, from the landmark for the previous five years, itemized operating and maintenance expenses for the previous five years, and depreciation deduction and annual cash flow before and after debt service, if any, during the same period;
(3) 
The remaining balance on any mortgage or other financing secured by the landmark and annual debt service, if any, during the prior five years;
(4) 
Real estate taxes for the previous four years and assessed value of the landmark according to the two most recent assessed valuations;
(5) 
All appraisals obtained within the previous three years by the owner in connection with the purchase, financing or ownership of the landmark;
(6) 
The fair market value of the landmark immediately prior to its designation and the fair market value of the landmark (in its protected status as a designated landmark) at the time the application is filed;
(7) 
Form of ownership or operation of the landmark, whether sole proprietorship, for profit or not-for-profit corporation, limited partnership, joint venture, or both;
(8) 
Any State or federal income tax returns on or relating to the landmark for the past two years.
b. 
The landmark is not marketable or able to be sold when listed for sale or lease. The sale price asked, and offers received, if any, within the previous two years, including testimony and relevant documents shall be submitted by the property owner. The following also shall be considered:
(1) 
Any real estate broker or firm engaged to sell or lease the landmark;
(2) 
Reasonableness of the price or lease sought by the owner;
(3) 
Any advertisements placed for the sale or lease of the landmark.
c. 
The infeasibility of alternative uses that can earn a reasonable economic return for the landmark as considered in relation to the following:
(1) 
A report from a licensed engineer or architect with experience in historic restoration or rehabilitation as to the structural soundness of the landmark and its suitability for restoration or rehabilitation;
(2) 
Estimates of the proposed cost of the proposed alteration and an estimate of any additional cost that would be incurred to comply with the recommendation and decision of the commission concerning the appropriateness of the proposed alteration;
(3) 
Estimated market value of the landmark in the current condition after completion of the proposed alteration, and, in the case of proposed demolition, after renovation of the landmark for continued use;
(4) 
In the case of proposed demolition, the testimony of an architect, developer, real estate consultant, appraiser or other real estate professional experienced in historic restoration or rehabilitation as to the economic feasibility of rehabilitation or re-use of the existing landmark;
(5) 
The infeasibility of new construction around, above, or below the historic resource.
d. 
Potential economic incentives and/or funding available to the owner through federal, State, county, City or private programs.
2. 
The owner has the present intent and the secured financial ability, demonstrated by appropriate documentary evidence to complete the alteration.
C. 
Notwithstanding the foregoing enumerated factors, the property owner may demonstrate other appropriate factors applicable to economic return.
D. 
Upon reasonable notice to the owner, the commission may appoint an expert or experts to provide advice and/or testimony concerning the value of the landmark, the availability of incentives and the economic impacts of approval, denial or partial denial of a certificate of appropriateness.
E. 
Any adverse economic impact caused intentionally or by willful neglect shall not constitute a basis for granting a certificate of appropriateness.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(F) (KCC 20.62.100))
A. 
Any person aggrieved by a decision of the commission designating or rejecting a nomination for designation of a landmark or issuing or denying a certificate of appropriateness may, within 35 calendar days of mailing of notice of such designation or rejection of nomination, or of such issuance or denial or approval of a certificate of appropriateness appeal such decision in writing to the council. The written notice of appeal shall be filed with the historic preservation officer and the city clerk and shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth the grounds for the appeal, supporting documents, and argument.
B. 
If, after examination of the written appeal and the record, the council determines that an error in fact may exist in the record, it shall remand the proceeding to the commission for reconsideration or, if the council determines that the decision of the commission is based on an error in judgment or conclusion, it may modify or reverse the decision of the commission.
C. 
The council's decision shall be based solely upon the record; provided, that the council may at its discretion publicly request additional information of the appellant, the commission or the historic preservation officer.
D. 
The council shall take final action on any appeal from a decision of the commission by adoption of an ordinance, and when so doing, it shall make and enter findings of fact from the record and reasons therefrom which support its action. The council may adopt all or portions of the commission's findings and conclusions.
E. 
The action of the council sustaining, reversing, modifying or remanding a decision of the commission shall be final unless within 20 calendar days from the date of the action an aggrieved person obtains a writ of certiorari from the superior court of King County, State of Washington, for the purpose of review of the action taken.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(G) (KCC 20.62.110))
Any person violating or failing to comply with the provisions of KMC § 2.20.070 shall incur a civil penalty of up to $500.00 per day and each day's violation or failure to comply shall constitute a separate offense; provided, however, that no penalty shall be imposed for any violation or failure to comply which occurs during the pendency of legal proceedings filed in any court challenging the validity of the provision or provisions of this chapter, as to which such violations or failure to comply is charged.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(H) (KCC 20.62.130))
A. 
There is hereby established and implemented a special valuation for historic properties as provided in Chapter 221, 1986 Laws of Washington and Chapter 84.26 RCW.
B. 
The City of Kenmore landmarks and heritage commission is hereby designated as the “local review board” for the purposes related to Chapter 221, 1986 Laws of Washington, and is authorized to perform all functions required by Chapter 221, 1986 Laws of Washington, Chapter 84.26 RCW, and Chapter 254-20 WAC.
C. 
All City of Kenmore landmarks designated and protected under authority of King County Ordinance 4828 and this chapter shall be eligible for special valuation as set forth in Chapter 221, 1986 Laws of Washington and Chapter 84.26 RCW.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(I) (KCC 20.62.140))
A. 
The City shall not approve any development proposal or otherwise issue any authorization to alter, demolish, or relocate any historic resource identified in the City historic resource inventory, pursuant to the requirements of this chapter. The development standards contained in KMC Title 18 may be modified, when necessary, to preserve the aesthetic, visual and historic integrity of the historic resource from the impacts of development on adjacent properties.
B. 
Upon receipt of an application for a development proposal located on or adjacent to a historic resource listed in the City of Kenmore historic resource inventory, the director shall follow the following procedure:
1. 
The development proposal application shall be circulated to the City of Kenmore historic preservation officer for comment on the impact of the project on historic resources and for recommendation on mitigation. This includes all permits for alterations to historic buildings, alteration to landscape elements, new construction on the same or abutting lots, or any other action requiring a permit which might affect the historic character of the resource. Information required for a complete permit application to be circulated to the historic preservation officer shall include:
a. 
A vicinity map;
b. 
A site plan showing the location of all buildings, structures, and landscape features;
c. 
A brief description of the proposed project together with architectural drawings showing the existing condition of all buildings, structures, landscape features and any proposed alteration to them;
d. 
Photographs of all buildings, structures, or landscape features on the site; and
e. 
An environmental checklist, except where categorically exempt under City of Kenmore SEPA guidelines.
2. 
Upon request, the historic preservation officer shall provide information about available grant assistance and tax incentives for historic preservation. The officer may also provide the owner, developer, or other interested party with examples of comparable projects where historic resources have been restored or rehabilitated.
3. 
In the event of a conflict between the development proposal and preservation of an historic resource, the historic preservation officer shall:
a. 
Suggest appropriate alternatives to the owner/developer which achieve the goals of historic preservation.
b. 
Recommend approval, or approval with conditions, to the director of the department of community development; or
c. 
Propose that a resource be nominated for City landmark designation according to procedures established in this chapter.
4. 
The director may continue to process the development proposal application, but shall not issue any development permits or issue a SEPA threshold determination until receiving a recommendation from the historic preservation officer. In no event shall review of the proposal by the historic preservation officer delay permit processing beyond any period required by law.
5. 
On known archaeological sites, before any disturbance of the site, including, but not limited to, test boring, site clearing, construction, grading or revegetation, the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP), and the City of Kenmore historic preservation officer, and appropriate Native American tribal organizations must be notified and State permits obtained, if required by law. The officer may require that a professional archaeological survey be conducted to identify site boundaries, resources and mitigation alternatives prior to any site disturbance and that a technical report be provided to the officer, OAHP and appropriate tribal organizations. The officer may approve, disapprove or require permits conditions, including professional archeological surveys, to mitigate adverse impacts to known archeological sites.
(Ord. 98-0008 § 3(J) (KCC 20.62.150); Ord. 11-0329 § 5)