SR 522 is a state route in the City with a functional classification of principal arterial. The purpose of this chapter is to implement an access management program consistent with Chapter 47.50 RCW and Chapters 468-51 and 468-52 WAC; to protect and preserve the functional integrity of SR 522 by providing for adequate safety and transportation capacity; to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and to promote the safe and efficient movement of people and goods.
The access management program, which coordinates land use planning and building permit decisions by the City and investments in the state highway system, will control the proliferation of connections and other access approaches to and from SR 522. Without such a program, the health, safety, and welfare of City residents and users of SR 522 are at risk due to the fact that uncontrolled access is a significant contributing factor to the congestion and functional deterioration of an arterial. The access management program further will enhance the development of an effective transportation system and increase the traffic-carrying capacity of SR 522, thereby reducing traffic accidents, personal injury, and property damage or loss; mitigating environmental degradation; promoting sound economic growth and the growth management goals of the state; reducing highway maintenance costs and the necessity for costly traffic operations measures; lengthening the effective life of the transportation infrastructure, thus preserving the public investment in such infrastructure; and shortening response time for emergency vehicles.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
Connections. New connections, existing connections, or alterations to existing connections to SR 522 require a connection permit. The use of a new connection at the location specified in the permit is not authorized until the applicant constructs or modifies the connection in accordance with permit requirements.
B. 
Change in Use. Where a parcel of property is already developed, but where the type of use for that property is changed, and where such change in use shall cause an increase of 10 peak hour trips generated from that property onto SR 522, then such change in use shall require a connection permit for its continued use of existing SR 522 connection(s). The connection permit may require modifications to the existing connection(s).
C. 
Permit Modification. If a property owner or applicant holding a valid connection permit wishes to alter the permit conditions, the permit holder must apply for a permit modification. The city manager shall have authority to approve or deny the modification application.
D. 
Construction Cost. The cost of construction or alteration of a connection shall be borne by the permittee.
E. 
Unpermitted Connection. An unpermitted connection to SR 522 that exists after approval of the ordinance codified in this chapter by the city council is subject to closure by the City. The City may install barriers across the connection or remove the connection if a connection permit is not approved by the City. The city manager will provide reasonable notice of the City’s impending action to the owner of property served by the connection. Cost of removal shall be paid for by the property owner.
F. 
Permit Fee. The City in this chapter has established a schedule of fees for connection permits. The fee shall be nonrefundable.
G. 
Joint-Use Connection. The city manager may issue a permit subject to any conditions necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, including, but not limited to, requiring the use of a joint-use connection.
H. 
Nonconforming Access Permit. The city manager may issue a nonconforming access permit after finding that to deny an access permit would leave the property without a reasonable means of access to the public road. Every nonconforming access permit shall specify limits on the maximum vehicular use of the connection and shall be conditioned on the availability of future alternative means of access for which access permits can be obtained.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
Terms within this chapter are defined in the Road Standards. The following additional definitions shall apply to this chapter unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
A. 
“Average weekday vehicle trip ends (AWDVTE)”
means the estimated total of all trips entering plus all trips leaving the applicant’s site, based on the final stage of proposed development.
B. 
“Conforming connection”
means a connection that meets current City criteria pertaining to location, spacing, and design.
C. 
“Connection”
means approaches, driveways, turnouts, or other means of providing for the right of access to or from a controlled access road.
D. 
“Connection category”
means a permit category of all state highway connections, in accordance with the type of property served and the estimated traffic generated by the applicant’s site, based on rates accepted by the City.
E. 
“Connection permit”
means a written authorization of the City for a specifically designed connection, at a specific location, for a specific type and intensity of property use, and specific volume of traffic for the proposed connection, based on the final stage of proposed development of the applicant’s property.
F. 
“ITE”
means the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
G. 
“Joint use driveway”
means a single access point that serves as a connection to more than one property or development, including those in different ownerships or in which access rights are provided in the legal descriptions.
H. 
“Median”
means the portion of a divided highway or divided connection separating vehicular traffic traveling in opposite directions; not including speed change lanes, storage lanes for left turning or U-turning vehicles, or two-way left-turn lanes.
I. 
“Reasonable access”
means an access connection that is suitable for the existing and/or proposed property use and does not adversely affect the safety, operations, or maintenance of the road.
J. 
“State highway system”
means all roads designated as state routes in compliance with Chapter 47.17 RCW.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
Early Consultation. To expedite the overall permit review process, the applicant is strongly encouraged to consult with the City prior to submitting an application pursuant to this chapter. The purpose of the consultation is to obtain a conceptual review of the development site plan and proposed access connections to SR 522 with respect to location, quantity, spacing, and design standards. Such consultation will assist the applicant in minimizing problems and delays during the permit application process and could eliminate the need for costly changes to site plans when a proposed connection would not be allowed and identified as such early in the planning phase.
B. 
Connection Categories. All connections, public or private, shall be determined by the City to be in one of the following categories:
1. 
“Category I - minimum connection” provides connection to SR 522 for up to 10 singlefamily residences, a duplex, or a small multifamily complex of up to 10 dwelling units, which use a common connection. The category shall also apply to permanent connections to agricultural and forest lands, including field entrances; connections for the operation, maintenance, and repair of facilities; and connections serving other low-volume traffic generators expected to have an AWDVTE of 100 or less.
2. 
“Category II - minor connection” provides connection to SR 522 for medium volume traffic generators expected to have an AWDVTE of 1,500 or less, but not included in Category I.
3. 
“Category III - major connection” provides connection to SR 522 for high volume traffic generators expected to have an AWDVTE exceeding 1,500.
4. 
“Category IV - temporary connection” provides a temporary, time limited connection to SR 522 for a specific property, for a specific use, with a specific traffic volume. Such uses include, but are not limited to, temporary construction and temporary emergency access. The City reserves the right to remove any temporary connection at its sole discretion and at the expense of the property owner/applicant after the expiration of the permit. Further, a temporary connection permit does not bind the City, in any way, to the future issuance of a permanent connection permit at the temporary connection location.
5. 
“Nonconforming connection” designation may be issued for Category I through IV permits after an analysis and determination by the City that a connection cannot be made that conforms to City standards and a finding that the denial of a connection would leave the property without a reasonable means of access to the public road system. In such instances, the permit shall be noted as nonconforming and contain specific restrictions and provisions, including limits on the maximum vehicular use of the connection, the future availability of alternate means of reasonable access for which a conforming connection permit could be obtained, the removal of the nonconforming connection at the time the conforming access is available, and other conditions as necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.
6. 
“Variance connection” means a special nonconforming permit, issued for a location not normally permitted by City standards, after an engineering study demonstrates that the connection will not adversely affect the safety, maintenance, or operation of SR 522. This permit will remain valid until modified or revoked by the City.
7. 
“Median opening” includes openings requested for both new connections and existing connections. Openings may consist of either (a) a full opening in a continuous median for the specific purpose of allowing vehicles to make a left turn maneuver into or out of a property abutting the highway, to facilitate U-turns, or to allow for a vehicle to totally cross the road, or (b) a directional opening allowing for left turn maneuvers into the property and U-turn maneuvers, but not allowing for left turns or cross movements out of the property.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
Driveway Connections That Are Part of a Land Use Application. If the connection permit is being requested as part of an underlying development, the issuance or denial of the connection permit shall be made in accordance with the type of decision applicable to the underlying land use application(s).
B. 
Driveway Connections That Are Not Related to a Land Use Application. If the connection permit is being requested without relation to an underlying land use application, the applicant shall file for a connection permit with the City. The issuance or denial of the connection permit shall be made administratively by the city manager, subject to appeal pursuant to subsection E of this section.
C. 
Submittal Requirements for Connection Permits. If the new development will generate more than 10 peak hour trips or is a change in use, each application for a connection permit, whether accompanying an underlying land use application or not, shall include a traffic impact study, as described below, the connection permit application, and additional information as required by the city manager.
1. 
Traffic Impact Study. The traffic impact study, prepared by a professional engineer, shall contain information as noted in the Road Standards plus the following:
a. 
An analysis of existing conditions including approved, but not yet built, development and applied for, but not yet approved, development.
b. 
Trip generation, modal split, distribution, assignment, and level of service analysis for intersections, adjacent to or within 250 feet of any proposed access, during peak hours and time periods as required by the city manager.
c. 
An analysis of three years of background growth, unless otherwise determined by the city manager.
d. 
A traffic signal warrant analysis of the projected impact of the proposed development upon the affected transportation corridor or intersection as required by the city manager.
e. 
Any additional information required by subsection (C)(2)(j)(5) of this section.
The traffic impact study shall be based on traffic counts obtained within the 12 months preceding the date the application is deemed complete. The traffic impact study levels of service and traffic operations analysis shall be consistent with the latest Highway Capacity Manual’s methodology. The city manager reserves the right to require an applicant to provide additional data and/or analysis as part of the traffic impact study, where the city manager determines that additional information or analysis is required to implement the standards and requirements contained in this chapter. The city manager may waive the requirement for a traffic impact study, or limit the scope of analysis and required elements of a traffic impact study, where the city manager determines that the potential transportation impacts on the SR 522 corridor or any of its intersections have been adequately analyzed in prior research or reports and are not projected to cause a reduction in the operating level of SR 522.
2. 
Connection Permit Application and Information. The applicant shall submit a connection permit application and shall provide information as required by the city manager. A complete application shall also consist of the connection information specified in this section.
a. 
All connection and roadway design documents for Category II and III permits shall bear the seal and signature of a professional engineer.
b. 
The applicant shall provide the following information, unless the city manager determines that specific information will not be necessary. Additional information required of Category II, III, and IV permit applications is specified in this chapter. In all cases it would be prudent, prior to submittal of the application, for the applicant to inquire of the City whether the application needs additional information. The city manager reserves the right to request clarification or additional information during the application review process. Failure to provide the requested information within the time limits specified in the request shall result in termination of the permit application.
c. 
Provide the current complete names, mailing addresses, and telephone numbers of the property owner(s), the developer(s), the applicant, and the transportation and legal consultants representing the applicant (if any). If the property owner requests to have a representative sign the application, a notarized letter of authorization from the applicant shall be provided with the application. When the owner or applicant is a company, corporation, or other public agency, the name, address, and telephone number of the responsible officer shall be furnished. The names of all individuals signing the application and their titles shall be typed or printed directly below the signature.
d. 
The ultimate planned property uses shall be indicated in sufficient detail to determine the appropriate permit classification. Estimated AWDVTE to be generated by the development, based on the planned property use, consistent with the latest trip generation information published by the ITE, Washington, D.C., shall be included as appropriate. If local or special trip generation rates are used instead of the ITE rates, the latest and best information shall be used and all documentation for the rate determination shall be submitted with the application. For residential developments with 10 or fewer units, 10 trips per day per unit may be assumed.
e. 
The application shall include a plan to scale showing critical dimensions, location of the property, existing conditions, and character and extent of the proposal. The location of existing and proposed on-site development with respect to the existing and proposed driveway location(s) and SR 522 shall be shown. Minimum information on the plan shall include:
(1) 
Street names.
(2) 
Pavement type.
(3) 
Cross section.
(4) 
Posted speed limit.
(5) 
The existence and location of any existing and/or future proposed public or private roads abutting or entering the property; the horizontal and vertical curvature of the road(s), noting the location of existing and proposed connections and any other pertinent information.
f. 
Property Information.
(1) 
Show the location of all existing and proposed buildings, and other structures, such as gasoline pumps, lights, trees, etc., with respect to the existing and proposed property and right-of-way lines.
(2) 
Show any adjacent properties that are owned or controlled by the applicant, or in which the applicant has a financial interest, and an indication of whether the properties will be accessed by means of the proposed connection(s).
(3) 
Provide proof of legal ownership or legal easement.
(4) 
Include a boundary survey, which may be waived for Category I connections, at the discretion of the city manager.
(5) 
Any existing or proposed parcels segregated from the applicant’s property for separate development shall be clearly designated on the plan.
g. 
Connection Location Information.
(1) 
Connection location by WSDOT milepost and highway engineer’s station, if available.
(2) 
Location of the SR 522 centerline with respect to existing and proposed property lines.
(3) 
Distance of proposed public or private access connection to intersecting roads.
(4) 
Existing or proposed median openings (crossovers) and connections on all sides of SR 522 and other roads within 660 feet of the proposed connection location.
(5) 
Location of existing or proposed public or private retaining walls, fences, poles, sidewalks, bike paths, drainage structures and easements, traffic control devices, fire hydrants, facilities, or other physical features, such as trees, landscaping, green belts, and wetlands that could affect driveway location.
h. 
Connection Design Information.
(1) 
Proposed connection and approach improvements, including the driveway profile approaching SR 522, and the driveway width, radii, and angle to the road.
(2) 
Existing and proposed grading.
(3) 
Drainage calculations and other pertinent data.
(4) 
Driveway, auxiliary lanes and crossover pavement design, including subgrade, base, surface materials, and thicknesses.
(5) 
Specific requirements for design information on individual Category I permit applications may be modified or waived, at the discretion of the city engineer.
i. 
Joint Driveway Use.
(1) 
If the driveway is to serve more than one property, the plan shall detail information for all properties using the connection and the application shall include copies of legally enforceable agreements of concurrence for all property owners on joint use driveways.
(2) 
Joint use driveways serving adjoining properties are required where feasible.
j. 
Additional Information for Category II and Category III Permits. The city manager may require the following additional information for each phase of the development. Prior to the submittal of the application, the applicant shall coordinate with the city engineer on the level of detail and the analysis techniques to be used.
(1) 
Circulation Plans. All parking, interior drives, and internal traffic circulation plans.
(2) 
Connection Users. All internal and external adjacent parcels which will use the requested connection. All existing and proposed connecting roadways and potential means of alternate access through the final build-out stage of development shall be shown on the plans submitted with the application.
(3) 
Traffic Control Devices and Illumination. Proposed traffic control devices and lighting locations.
(4) 
Sight Distance. Analysis of horizontal and vertical sight distance on SR 522 with respect to the proposed connection.
(5) 
Traffic Data and Analysis. Traffic data submitted by the applicant shall be signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer. The city manager may require the following traffic study information:
(a) 
Turning Movements. Vehicle turning movements for present and future traffic conditions.
(b) 
Volume and Type. Amount and type of traffic that will be generated by the proposed development including a breakdown of anticipated peak hour traffic and an analysis of the impact on the level of service on the state highway.
(c) 
Parking and Circulation. Analysis of off-street parking and traffic circulation, including distances to secondary access points on the connection roadway and their impact on the operation of the state highway.
(d) 
Traffic Signal Data. If a traffic signal is requested, the following studies may be required: traffic signal warrants; phasing and timing analysis; signal progression analysis; signalization, signing, and lighting plans in compliance with WSDOT standards. A separate WSDOT traffic signal permit is required.
(e) 
Off-Site Improvements. A traffic analysis to determine the need for off-site related roadway and geometric improvements and mitigation requirements.
(f) 
Traffic Control Plan. A traffic control plan conforming to current standards set forth in the “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices,” documenting how the permit holder will provide for safe and efficient movement on the state highway system during the construction of the connection.
(6) 
Median Openings. New or modified median openings proposed as part of a new driveway connection shall be reviewed as part of the permit application review process. Request for the construction of new or modified median openings to serve existing permitted connections shall require a reevaluation of the location, quantity, design of existing connections, and traffic at the existing connections. The property owner must file a new connection permit application, for the proper connection category, showing the proposed new or modified median opening location and design and its relationship to the existing or modified driveway connections. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit the City from closing an existing median opening where operational or safety reasons require the action. The City shall notify affected property owner, permit holders and tenants in writing 30 days in advance of the closure of a median opening unless immediate closure is needed for safety or operational reasons.
(7) 
WSDOT Review. A WSDOT permit or project review may be required by WSDOT. Applicant is responsible for contacting and coordinating with WSDOT on all work on SR 522.
3. 
Additional Information for Category IV Permits. Category IV permit applications shall contain the specific dates that the connection is to be open and must contain assurances acceptable to the City that the shoulder, curbing, sidewalks, bikeways, ditch, right-of-way, and any other amenities will be restored to their original condition at the permit holder’s expense upon closure of the temporary connection.
D. 
Variance Connection. The access standards above may be modified by the city engineer on the connection permit upon a showing by the applicant of the following:
1. 
Topography, right-of-way, existing construction or physical conditions, or other geographic conditions make it technically infeasible to meet current standards and an equivalent alternative, which can accomplish the same access management purpose, is available.
2. 
A minor change to a standard is required to address a specific design or construction problem which, if not enacted, will result in an unusual hardship.
3. 
An alternative standard is proposed which is equal to or superior to the current standards.
4. 
Application of standards to the development would be grossly disproportional to the impacts created to the public.
E. 
Appeals. The applicant may appeal the decision of the city engineer under the following conditions:
1. 
For driveway connections that are part of land use application review, the appeal of a conditioning or denial of a connection permit shall be in accordance with the procedures for an appeal of the underlying land use application.
2. 
For all other driveway connection permit applications, the appeal of a conditioning or denial of a connection permit shall be to the city manager.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
Each application requires fees, imposed by the city council by resolution, payable to the City for the administrative costs and expenses of processing the application and for other functions necessary for the approval and use of the permits.
B. 
Surety Bond. Prior to the beginning of construction of any connection, the City may require the permit holder to provide a surety bond as specified in WAC 468-34-020(3).
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
Application Review, Processing, and Approval. Applications for all SR 522 connection permits shall be submitted, in writing, to the City. The application process and documentation shall be in accordance with the administrative procedures developed by the City and shall contain whatever information, including plans and specifications, which the City shall require.
B. 
Permit Conditions. The permit requirements and provisions shall be binding on the permit holder, the permit holder’s successors, heirs and assigns, the permit application signatories, and all future owners and occupants of the property. All long-term provisions exceeding the term of any bond shall be recorded onto the property title.
C. 
Nonconforming Connection Permits. The City may issue a nonconforming connection permit requiring a legally enforceable joint-use driveway when determined to be in the best interest of the City for restoring or maintaining the operational efficiency and safety of SR 522. All nonconforming connection permits shall specify conditions or limits including:
1. 
Traffic Volume. The permit shall specify maximum vehicular usage of the connection.
2. 
Future Alternate Access. The permit shall specify that a conforming connection be constructed when future alternate means of access become available, and that the nonconforming connection be removed.
3. 
Users. The permit shall specify the properties to be served by the connection, and any other conditions as necessary to carry out the provisions of managing the access to SR 522.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
Disruption of Traffic. All construction and/or maintenance within the SR 522 right-of-way shall conform to the provisions of the connection permit, the current “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)”; WSDOT’s current “Design Manual,” and WSDOT’s current “Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction.” The City may require or restrict hours of construction to minimize disruption of traffic. If construction activity within the SR 522 right-of-way causes undue disruption of traffic or creates safety hazards, or if the construction activity is not in compliance with the traffic control specifications in the permit, the city manager shall advise the permit holder or the permit holder’s contractor of the need for immediate corrective action and may order immediate suspension of all or part of the work if deemed necessary. Failure to comply with this provision may result in permit modification or revocation.
B. 
Traffic Signals and Other Traffic Control Devices. The permit holder shall be responsible for coordinating with and securing any WSDOT permits needed for traffic signalization and regulatory signing and marking.
C. 
Connection Construction Inspection. For Category II and Category III connections, the city manager may require the permit holder, developer, or owner to provide inspection of construction and certification that connection construction is in accordance with permit provisions and appropriate City standards.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
The connection permit shall be issued to the permit holder for a particular type of land use generating specific projected traffic volumes at the final stage of proposed development. Any changes made in the use, intensity of development, type of traffic, or traffic flow of the property requires the permit holder, any assignee, or property owner to contact the city manager to determine whether further analysis is needed to determine if the change is significant and would require a new permit and modifications to the connection. An engineering study, signed and sealed by a professional engineer, may be required to document the extent of the change. If modification of the existing connection is required, based on a significant change as determined by the city engineer, the permit holder, his or her assignee, or the property owner shall obtain a new permit prior to the initiation of any on-site construction to the connection or to the property.
A. 
Significant Change. A significant change is one that would cause a change in the category of the connection permit or one that causes an operational, safety, or maintenance problem on SR 522 based on objective engineering criteria or available crash data. Such data shall be provided to the property owner and/or permit holder and tenant upon written request.
B. 
Notification. Failure to contact the City to determine the need for connection modifications or to apply for a new permit for such modifications prior to initiation of property improvements, land use changes or traffic flow alteration actions shall result in notification to the property owner and/or permit holder and tenant of intent to revoke the existing permit and closure of the connection to the property.
C. 
Costs. The permit holder shall be responsible for all costs associated with connection removal, relocation, or modification caused by increased or altered traffic flows necessitated by changes to the site, use, or to the nature of the business on the property.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
Revocation Criteria. All connection permits issued by the City remain valid until revoked. The city manager may initiate an action to revoke any permit if significant changes have occurred in the use, design, or traffic flow of the property or of SR 522, requiring the relocation, alteration, or closure of the connection; if the connection was not constructed at the location or to the design specified in the permit; if the permit provisions were not met; or if the connection causes a safety, maintenance, or operational problem on the road.
The city manager shall give written notice to the permit holder, the permit holder’s successors or assigns, or the property owner with a copy to the occupant, for any connection found to be in noncompliance with the conditions of the permit or this chapter. The notice shall identify the deficiencies and request that they be corrected within 30 calendar days of the date of the notice. The notice shall further advise that the City’s determination of noncompliance or deficiencies shall become final and conclusive 30 calendar days following the date of the notice unless the violations are corrected or an appeal is filed by the permit holder, permit holder’s successor or assigns, or the property owner.
B. 
Costs. The permit holder, permit holder’s successor or assignee, or property owner shall be responsible for the costs of closure due to revocation of a connection permit, except when the closure is required by changes to SR 522.
C. 
Emergency Action. This chapter shall not restrict the city engineer’s right to take immediate remedial action, including the closure of a connection, if there is an immediate and serious danger to the public health, safety, and welfare.
D. 
Appeals. All appeals must be received within 30 calendar days of the date of the notice. Appeals shall include all contact information and justification for why the City’s decision is in error or extenuating circumstances that merit reconsideration. Appeals shall be reviewed by the city manager. Appeal decisions shall be final and may not be further appealed.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))
A. 
WSDOT has created an access control classification system consisting of five classes, where Class One is the least restrictive. WSDOT has designated SR 522 as Class Four. On all access classes, property access shall be located and designed to minimize interference with transit operations and/or high occupancy vehicle (HOV) use on SR 522 where such operations/uses exist or where such operations/uses are proposed. In such cases, if reasonable access is available from the City street system, primary property access shall be provided from the City street system rather than from SR 522.
B. 
SR 522, with its Class Four designation, has the following functional characteristics and access control standards:
1. 
Functional Characteristics. SR 522 has the capacity for moderate travel speeds and moderate traffic volumes for medium and short travel distances providing for inter-City, intra-City, and inter-community travel needs. There is to be a reasonable balance between direct access and mobility needs. Existing level of development of the adjoining land is intensive. SR 522 is distinguished by existing or planned nonrestrictive medians. Restrictive medians may be used as operational conditions warrant to mitigate turning, weaving, and crossing conflicts. Minimum connection spacing standards should be applied if adjoining properties are redeveloped.
2. 
Access Control Design Standards. The public roadway intersection spacing and driveway connection spacing distances specified are minimums. Greater distances may be required by the city engineer to provide desirable traffic operational and safety characteristics. If greater distances are required, the city engineer will document the reasons, based on traffic engineering principles, for such greater distances. Nonconforming permits may be issued allowing for less than minimum spacing where no other reasonable access exists. A variance connection permit may be issued where it can be substantiated by a traffic analysis, to the satisfaction of the city engineer, that allowing less than the minimum spacing or more than the maximum number of connections would not adversely affect the desired function of SR 522 and would not adversely affect the safety, maintenance or operation of SR 522.
a. 
Public Roadway Intersections. In the City, where higher volumes are present or growth that will require signalization is expected in the foreseeable future, it is imperative that the location of any public access be planned carefully to ensure adequate signal progression. Where feasible, major intersecting roadways that may ultimately require signalization shall be planned with a minimum of one-half mile spacing. Addition of all new connections, public or private, that may require signalization will require an engineering analysis signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer.
b. 
Private Direct Access.
(1) 
Regardless of the number of access points that exist prior to any development, no more than one access shall be provided to an individual parcel or to contiguous parcels under the same owner, unless it can be shown that additional access points are necessary for the functionality of the development, would not adversely affect the desired function, safety, or operations on SR 522, and would not cause an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, and welfare.
(2) 
The minimum distance to another public or private access connection shall be 250 feet. Nonconforming connection permits may be issued to provide access to parcels whose highway frontage, topography, or location would otherwise preclude issuance of a conforming connection permit.
(3) 
Variance permits may be allowed if conditions warrant. These conditions must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the city engineer by a traffic analysis that is signed and sealed by a qualified professional engineer.
3. 
Corner Clearance. Corner clearances for connections shall meet or exceed the minimum connection spacing requirements. A single connection may be placed closer to the intersection in accordance with the following criteria:
a. 
If, due to property size, corner clearance standards cannot be met, and where joint use driveways meeting or exceeding the minimum corner clearance standards cannot be obtained, or is determined by the city engineer to be not feasible because of conflicting land use or conflicting traffic volumes or operational characteristics, then the following minimum corner clearance criteria may be used:
Corner Clearance at Intersections
Position
Access Allowed
Minimum (Feet)
With Restrictive Median
Approaching intersection
Right in/right out
115
Approaching intersection
Right in only
75
Departing intersection
Right in/right out
230
Departing intersection
Right out only
100
Without Restrictive Median
Approaching intersection
Full access
230
Approaching intersection
Right in only
100
Departing intersection
Full access
230
Departing intersection
Right out only
100
b. 
Additional Conditions.
(1) 
There shall be no more than one connection per abutting property on SR 522 regardless of minimum connection spacing unless it can be shown that additional access points are necessary for the functionality of the development, would not adversely affect the desired function, safety, or operations on SR 522, and would not cause an unreasonable risk to public health, safety, and welfare.
(2) 
When joint use driveways or alternate accesses meeting or exceeding the minimum corner clearance standards becomes available, the permit holder shall close the permitted connection, unless the permit holder shows to the city engineer’s satisfaction that such closure is not feasible.
(Ord. 23-0578 § 2 (Exh. 1))