A.
Establishment of Buffers. The city manager shall require the establishment of buffer areas for activities in, or adjacent to, fish and wildlife habitats of importance when needed to protect fish and wildlife habitats of importance. Buffers shall consist of an undisturbed area of native vegetation, or areas identified for restoration, established to protect the integrity, functions and values of the affected habitat. Buffer enhancement may be required. Required buffer widths shall reflect the sensitivity of the habitat and the type and intensity of human activity, and site design proposed to be conducted on or near the critical area, and shall be consistent with the management recommendations issued by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife.
B.
Alterations Shall Not Degrade the Functions and Values of Habitat. Wildlife habitat areas of importance may be altered only if the proposed alteration of the habitat or the mitigation proposed does not degrade the quantitative and qualitative functions and values of the habitat. Fish habitat areas of importance may be altered only when necessary to install water-dependent developments that are mitigated consistent with this chapter and Division I of KMC Title 16 (Shoreline Management), when applicable.
C.
Nonindigenous Species Shall Not Be Introduced. No plant, wildlife, or fish species not indigenous to the region shall be introduced into a fish and wildlife habitat of importance unless authorized by a State or federal permit or approval.
D.
Mitigation Shall Result in Contiguous Habitat. When feasible, mitigation sites shall be located to achieve contiguous wildlife habitat corridors in accordance with a mitigation plan that is part of an approved critical areas report to minimize the isolating effects of development on habitat areas, so long as mitigation of aquatic habitat is located within the same aquatic ecosystem as the area disturbed.
E.
Mitigation Shall Achieve Equivalent or Greater Biological Functions. Mitigation of alterations to habitat areas of importance shall achieve equivalent or greater biologic functions and shall include mitigation for adverse impacts upstream or downstream of the development proposal site. Mitigation shall address each function affected by the alteration to achieve functional equivalency or improvement on a per function basis.
F.
Approvals Shall Be Supported by the Best Available Science. Any approval of alterations or impacts to a fish and wildlife habitat of importance shall be supported by the best available science. Special consideration shall be given to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fish and their habitat, such as salmon and bull trout, as required by WAC 365-195-900 through 365-195-925.
(Ord. 11-0329 § 3 (Exh. 1); Ord. 19-0488 § 2 (Exh. 1); Ord. 24-0624 § 5 (Exh. C))