(a) 
The purpose of the city's critical areas regulations contained in Chapters 22.92, 22.93, 22.94, 22.95, 22.96, 22.97, 22.99 and 22.100 FMC is to designate and classify ecologically sensitive and hazardous areas and to protect these areas and their functions and values, while also allowing for reasonable use of private property.
(b) 
These regulations are to implement the goals, policies, guidelines, and requirements of the city's comprehensive plan and the Growth Management Act.
(c) 
The city finds that critical areas provide a variety of valuable and beneficial biological and physical functions that benefit the city and its residents, and/or may pose a threat to human safety or to public and private property. The beneficial functions and values provided by critical areas include, but are not limited to, water quality protection and enhancement, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain support, flood storage, conveyance and attenuation of floodwaters, ground water recharge and discharge, erosion control, protection from hazards, historical, archaeological, and aesthetic value protection, and recreation. These beneficial functions are not listed in order of priority.
(d) 
Goals. By limiting development and alteration of critical areas, these regulations seek to:
(1) 
Protect members of the public and public resources and facilities from injury, loss of life, or property damage due to landslides and steep slope failures, erosion, seismic events, or flooding;
(2) 
Maintain healthy, functioning ecosystems through the protection of unique, fragile, and valuable elements of the environment, including ground and surface waters, wetlands, and fish and wildlife and their habitats, and to conserve the biodiversity of plant and animal species;
(3) 
Direct activities not dependent on critical areas resources to less ecologically sensitive sites and mitigate unavoidable impacts to critical areas by regulating alterations in and adjacent to critical areas; and
(4) 
Prevent cumulative adverse environmental impacts to water quality, wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat, and the overall net loss of wetlands, frequently flooded areas, and habitat conservation areas.
(e) 
These regulations are intended to protect critical areas in accordance with the Growth Management Act and through the application of the best available science, as determined according to WAC 365-195-900 through 365-195-925, and in consultation with state and federal agencies and other qualified professionals.
(f) 
These regulations are to be administered with flexibility and attention to site-specific characteristics. Consistent with RCW 36.70A.020(12), it is not the intent of these regulations to make a parcel of property unusable by denying its owner reasonable economic use of the property or to prevent the provision of public facilities and services necessary to support existing development and planned for by the community without decreasing current service levels below minimum standards.
(g) 
The city's enactment or enforcement of these regulations shall not be construed for the benefit of any individual person or group of persons other than the general public.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
As provided herein, the director is given the authority to interpret and apply, and the responsibility to enforce these regulations, to accomplish the stated purpose.
(b) 
The city may withhold, condition, or deny development permits or activity approvals to ensure that the proposed action is consistent with these regulations.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
These critical areas regulations shall apply as an overlay and in addition to zoning and other regulations adopted by the city.
(b) 
Any individual critical area adjoined by another type of critical area shall have the buffer and meet the requirements that provide the most protection to the critical areas involved. When any existing regulation, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflicts with these critical areas regulations, that regulation which provides more protection to the critical areas shall apply.
(c) 
These critical areas regulations shall apply concurrently with review conducted under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), as adopted by the city. Any conditions required pursuant to these regulations shall be included in the SEPA review and threshold determination.
(d) 
Compliance with these critical areas regulations does not constitute compliance with other federal, state, and local regulations and permit requirements that may be required (for example, Hydraulic Permit Act (HPA) permits, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits, and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits). The applicant is responsible for complying with these requirements, apart from the process established in the city's critical areas regulations.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
The city shall regulate all uses, activities, and developments within, adjacent to, or likely to affect, one or more critical areas, consistent with the best available science and the provisions herein.
(b) 
Critical areas regulated by this title include:
(1) 
Wetlands as designated in Chapter 22.93 FMC;
(2) 
Critical aquifer recharge areas as designated in Chapter 22.94 FMC;
(3) 
Frequently flooded areas as designated in Chapter 22.99 FMC;
(4) 
Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas as designated in Chapter 22.97 FMC; and
(5) 
Geologically hazardous areas as designated in Chapter 22.100 FMC.
(c) 
All areas within the city meeting the definition of one or more critical areas, regardless of any formal identification, are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of the applicable critical areas chapters.
(d) 
Areas Adjacent to Critical Areas Subject to Regulation. Areas adjacent to critical areas shall be considered to be within the jurisdiction of these requirements and regulations to support the intent of the applicable critical areas chapters and ensure protection of the functions and values of critical areas. "Adjacent" shall mean any activity located:
(1) 
On a site immediately adjoining a critical area;
(2) 
A distance equal to or less than the required critical area buffer width and building setback;
(3) 
A distance equal to or less than 800 feet from a bald eagle nest;
(4) 
A distance equal to or less than 300 feet upland from a stream, wetland, or water body; or
(5) 
Within the floodway, floodplain, or channel migration zone.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
Any action taken pursuant to the applicable critical areas chapters shall result in equivalent or greater functions and values of the critical areas associated with the proposed action, as determined by the best available science. All actions and developments shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the mitigation sequencing order specified in FMC § 22.92.190 to avoid, minimize, and restore all adverse impacts. Applicants must first demonstrate an inability to avoid or reduce impacts before restoration and compensation of impacts will be allowed. No activity or use shall be allowed that results in a net loss of the functions or values of critical areas.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Protect Functions and Values of Critical Areas with Special Consideration to Anadromous Fish. Critical area reports and decisions to alter critical areas shall rely on the best available science to protect the functions and values of critical areas and must give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fish, such as salmon and bull trout, and their habitat, consistent with RCW 36.70A.172.1.
(b) 
Best Available Science to Be Consistent with Criteria. The best available science is that scientific information applicable to the critical area prepared by local, state, or federal natural resource agencies, a qualified scientific professional, or team of qualified scientific professionals that is consistent with criteria established in WAC 365-195-900 through 365-195-925.
(c) 
Characteristics of a Valid Scientific Process. In the context of critical areas protection, a valid scientific process is one that produces reliable information useful in understanding the consequences of a local government's regulatory decisions, and in developing critical areas policies and development regulations that will be effective in protecting the functions and values of critical areas. To determine whether information received during the permit review process is reliable scientific information, the director shall determine whether the source of the information displays the characteristics of a valid scientific process. Such characteristics are as follows:
(1) 
Peer Review. The information has been critically reviewed by other persons who are qualified scientific experts in that scientific discipline. The proponents of the information have addressed the criticism of the peer reviewers. Publication in a refereed scientific journal usually indicates that the information has been appropriately peer-reviewed;
(2) 
Methods. The methods used to obtain the information are clearly stated and reproducible. The methods are standardized in the pertinent scientific discipline or, if not, the methods have been appropriately peer-reviewed to ensure their reliability and validity;
(3) 
Logical Conclusions and Reasonable Inferences. The conclusions presented are based on reasonable assumptions supported by other studies and consistent with the general theory underlying the assumptions. The conclusions are logically and reasonably derived from the assumptions and supported by the data presented. Any gaps in information and inconsistencies with other pertinent scientific information are adequately explained;
(4) 
Quantitative Analysis. The data have been analyzed using appropriate statistical or quantitative methods;
(5) 
Context. The information is placed in proper context. The assumptions, analytical techniques, data, and conclusions are appropriately framed with respect to the prevailing body of pertinent scientific knowledge; and
(6) 
References. The assumptions, analytical techniques, and conclusions are well-referenced with citations to relevant, credible literature and other pertinent existing information.
(d) 
Nonscientific Information. Nonscientific information may supplement scientific information, but it is not an adequate substitute for valid and available scientific information. Common sources of nonscientific information include the following:
(1) 
Anecdotal Information. One or more observations that are not part of an organized scientific effort (for example, "I saw a bald eagle in that area while I was hiking");
(2) 
Non-Expert Opinion. Opinion of a person who is not a qualified scientific expert in a pertinent scientific discipline (for example, "I do not believe there are bald eagles in that area"); and
(3) 
Hearsay. Information repeated from communication with others (for example, "At a lecture last week, Dr. Jones said there were no bald eagles in that area").
(e) 
Absence of Valid Scientific Information. Where there is an absence of valid scientific information or incomplete scientific information relating to a critical area leading to uncertainty about the risk to critical area function of permitting an alteration of or impact to the critical area, the director shall:
(1) 
Take a "precautionary" or a "no-risk approach," that strictly limits development and land use activities until the uncertainty is sufficiently resolved; and
(2) 
Require application of an effective adaptive management program that relies on scientific methods to evaluate how well regulatory and nonregulatory actions protect the critical area. An adaptive management program is a formal and deliberate scientific approach to taking action and obtaining information in the face of uncertainty. An adaptive management program shall:
(A) 
Address funding for the research component of the adaptive management program;
(B) 
Change course based on the results and interpretation of new information that resolves uncertainties; and
(C) 
Commit to the appropriate timeframe and scale necessary to reliably evaluate regulatory and nonregulatory actions affecting protection of critical areas and anadromous fisheries.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
The provisions of the critical areas chapters shall apply to all lands, all land uses and development activity, and all structures and facilities in the city, whether or not a permit or authorization is required, and shall apply to every person, firm, partnership, corporation, group, governmental agency, or other entity that owns, leases, or administers land within the city. No person, company, agency, or applicant shall alter a critical area or buffer except as consistent with the purposes and requirements of these chapters.
(b) 
The city shall not approve any permit or otherwise issue any authorization to alter the condition of any land, water, or vegetation, or to construct or alter any structure or improvement in, over, or on a critical area or associated buffer, without first ensuring compliance with the requirements of these chapters.
(c) 
Approval of a permit or development proposal pursuant to the provisions of these chapters does not discharge the obligation of the applicant to comply with the provisions of these chapters.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Exemption Request and Review Process. The proponent of the activity may submit a written request for exemption to the director that describes the activity and states the exemption listed in this section that applies.
The director shall review the exemption request to verify that it complies with the applicable critical areas chapters and approve or deny the exemption. If the exemption is approved, it shall be placed on file with the department. If the exemption is denied, the proponent may continue in the review process and shall be subject to the requirements of these chapters.
(b) 
Exempt Activities and Impacts to Critical Areas. All exempted activities shall use reasonable methods to avoid potential impacts to critical areas. To be exempt from the applicable critical areas chapters does not give permission to degrade a critical area or ignore risk from natural hazards. Any incidental damage to, or alteration of, a critical area that is not a necessary outcome of the exempted activity shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the responsible party's expense.
(c) 
Exempt Activities. The following developments, activities, and associated uses shall be exempt from the provisions of the applicable critical areas chapters; provided, that they are otherwise consistent with the provisions of other local, state, and federal laws and requirements:
(1) 
Emergencies. Those activities necessary to prevent an immediate threat to public health, safety, or welfare, or that pose an immediate risk of damage to private property and that require remedial or preventative action in a timeframe too short to allow for compliance with the requirements of these chapters.
Emergency actions that create an impact to a critical area or its buffer shall use reasonable methods to address the emergency; in addition, they must have the least possible impact to the critical area or its buffer. The person or agency undertaking such action shall notify the city within one working day following commencement of the emergency activity. Within 30 days, the director shall determine if the action taken was within the scope of the emergency actions allowed in this subsection. If the director determines that the action taken, or any part of the action taken, was beyond the scope of an allowed emergency action, then enforcement provisions of FMC § 22.92.290 shall apply.
After the emergency, the person or agency undertaking the action shall fully fund and conduct necessary restoration and/or mitigation for any impacts to the critical area and buffers resulting from the emergency action in accordance with an approved critical area report and mitigation plan. The person or agency undertaking the action shall apply for review, and the alteration, critical area report, and mitigation plan shall be reviewed by the city in accordance with the review procedures contained herein. Restoration and/or mitigation activities must be initiated within one year of the date of the emergency, and completed in a timely manner;
(2) 
Operation, Maintenance, or Repair. Operation, maintenance, or repair of existing structures, infrastructure improvements, utilities, public or private roads, dikes, levees, or drainage systems, that do not require construction permits, if the activity does not further alter or increase the impact to, or encroach further within, the critical area or buffer and there is no increased risk to life or property as a result of the proposed operation, maintenance, or repair. Operation and maintenance includes vegetation management performed in accordance with best management practices that is part of ongoing maintenance of structures, infrastructure, or utilities; provided, that such management actions are part of regular and ongoing maintenance, do not expand further into the critical area, are not the result of an expansion of the structure or utility, and do not directly impact an endangered or threatened species;
(3) 
Passive Outdoor Activities. Recreation, education, and scientific research activities that do not degrade the critical area, including fishing, hiking, and bird watching. Trails must be constructed pursuant to the public and private pedestrian trails standards specified in FMC § 22.92.110(c)(5);
(4) 
Forest Practices. Forest practices regulated and conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 76.09 RCW and forest practices regulations, WAC Title 222;
(5) 
Construction within Previously Approved Planned Developments. Construction or reconstruction of a single-family, duplex or condominium unit on a lot that was platted or approved within a planned development subsequent to the city's adoption of interim critical areas regulations in 1993 and prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter, provided such unit is constructed in accordance with all applicable critical areas regulations in effect at the time of platting or approval; and
(6) 
Structural Modification of, Additions to, or Replacement of, Existing Residential Structures. Structural modification of, additions to, or replacement of, existing principal residential structures lawfully established prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter that do not meet the critical area buffer or building setback requirements; provided, that:
(A) 
The structure is located within a wetland buffer, fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer, or associated buffer building setback;
(B) 
The structure is not located within a frequently flooded area, geologically hazardous area buffer, or associated buffer building setback;
(C) 
The modification, addition, replacement or related activity will not increase impervious surface by more than 500 square feet, in total, on the site;
(D) 
There is no other practicable location within the site that will accommodate the activity, meet the buffer and building setback requirements, and satisfy all other requirements of this title; and
(E) 
For lots adjoining Leach Creek or Ross Creek, the proposed activity will not encroach into the required buffer beyond that of the existing principal residential structure, and any increase in impervious surface will be compensated for by the planting of native plants within the buffer at a 1:1 ratio of native planting area to increased impervious surface area (i.e., 100 square feet of native planting area would need to be installed in the buffer for 100 square feet of new impervious surface).
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
If the application of a critical areas chapter would prohibit a development proposal by a public agency or public utility, the agency or utility may apply for an exception pursuant to this section.
(b) 
Exception Request and Review Process. An application for a public agency and utility exception shall be made to the city and shall include a critical area identification form; critical area report, including mitigation plan, if necessary; and any other related project documents, such as permit applications to other agencies, special studies, and environmental documents prepared pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21C RCW). The director shall prepare a recommendation to the hearing examiner based on review of the submitted information, a site inspection, and the proposal's ability to comply with public agency and utility exception review criteria in subsection (d) of this section.
(c) 
Hearing Examiner Review. The hearing examiner shall review the application and director's recommendation, and conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 22.09 FMC. The hearing examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request based on the proposal's ability to comply with all of the public agency and utility exception criteria in subsection (d) of this section.
(d) 
Public Agency and Utility Review Criteria. The criteria for review and approval of public agency and utility exceptions follow:
(1) 
There is no other practical alternative to the proposed development with less impact on the critical areas;
(2) 
The application of the critical areas chapter would unreasonably restrict the ability to provide utility services to the public;
(3) 
The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site;
(4) 
The proposal attempts to protect and mitigate impacts to the critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science; and
(5) 
The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
(6) 
All proposed activities will be conducted using the best management practices adopted by the city, as described in FMC § 22.92.110(b).
(e) 
Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to bring forth evidence in support of the application and to provide sufficient information on which any decision has to be made on the application.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1638 § 60, 2019)
(a) 
If the application of a critical areas chapter would deny all reasonable economic use of the subject property, the city shall determine if compensation is an appropriate action, or the property owner may apply for an exception pursuant to this section.
(b) 
Exception Request and Review Process. An application for a reasonable use exception shall be made to the city and shall include a critical area identification form; critical area report, including mitigation plan, if necessary; and any other related project documents, such as permit applications to other agencies, special studies, and environmental documents prepared pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21C RCW) (SEPA documents). The director shall prepare a recommendation to the hearing examiner based on review of the submitted information, a site inspection, and the proposal's ability to comply with reasonable use exception criteria in subsection (d) of this section.
(c) 
Hearing Examiner Review. The hearing examiner shall review the application and conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 22.09 FMC. The hearing examiner shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the request based on the proposal's ability to comply with all of the reasonable use exception review criteria in subsection (d) of this section.
(d) 
Reasonable Use Review Criteria. Criteria for review and approval of reasonable use exceptions follow; one or more may apply:
(1) 
The application of the critical areas chapters would deny all reasonable economic use of the property;
(2) 
No other reasonable economic use of the property has less impact on the critical area;
(3) 
The proposed impact to the critical area is the minimum necessary to allow for reasonable economic use of the property;
(4) 
The inability of the applicant to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant, or its predecessor, after the effective date of the critical area chapters;
(5) 
The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site; and
(6) 
The proposal will result in no net loss of critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science.
(7) 
All proposed activities will be conducted using best available management practices adopted by the city, as described in FMC § 22.92.110(b).
(e) 
Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to bring forth evidence in support of the application and to provide sufficient information on which any decision has to be made on the application.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1638 § 61, 2019)
(a) 
Critical Area Report. Activities allowed under the applicable critical areas chapter(s) shall have been reviewed and permitted or approved by the city or other agency with jurisdiction, but do not require submittal of a separate critical area identification form or critical area report, unless such submittal was required previously for the underlying permit. The director may apply conditions to the underlying permit or approval to ensure that the allowed activity is consistent with the provisions of these chapters to protect critical areas.
(b) 
Required Use of Best Management Practices. All allowed activities shall be conducted using the best management practices adopted by the city, including but not limited to those contained within the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, that result in the least amount of impact to the critical areas. Best management practices shall be used for tree and vegetation protection, construction management, erosion and sedimentation control, water quality protection, and regulation of chemical applications. The city shall observe the use of best management practices to ensure that the activity does not result in degradation to the critical area. Any incidental damage to, or alteration of, a critical area shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the responsible party's expense.
(c) 
Allowed Activities. The following activities are allowed:
(1) 
Permit Requests Subsequent to Previous Critical Area Review. Development permits and approvals that involve both discretionary land use approvals (such as subdivisions, rezones, or conditional use permits), and construction approvals (such as building permits) if all of the following conditions have been met:
(A) 
The provisions of the applicable critical areas chapter(s) have been previously addressed as part of another approval;
(B) 
There have been no material changes in the potential impact to the critical area or buffer since the prior review;
(C) 
There is no new information available that is applicable to any critical area review of the site or particular critical area;
(D) 
The permit or approval has not expired or, if no expiration date, no more than five years has elapsed since the issuance of that permit or approval; and
(E) 
Compliance with any standards or conditions placed upon the prior permit or approval has been achieved or secured;
(2) 
Modification to Existing Structures. Structural modification of, addition to, or replacement of an existing legally constructed structure that does not further alter or increase the impact to the critical area or buffer and there is no increased risk to life or property as a result of the proposed modification or replacement; provided, that restoration of structures substantially damaged by fire, flood, or act of nature must be initiated within one year of the date of such damage, as evidenced by the issuance of a valid building permit, and diligently pursued to completion;
(3) 
Activities within the Improved Right-of-Way. Replacement, modification, installation, or construction of utility facilities, lines, pipes, mains, equipment, or appurtenances, not including substations, when such facilities are located within the improved portion of the public right-of-way or a city-authorized private roadway except those activities that alter a wetland or watercourse, such as culverts or bridges, or result in the transport of sediment or increased stormwater, subject to the following:
(A) 
Critical area and/or buffer widths shall be increased, where possible, equal to the width of the right-of-way improvement, including disturbed areas; and
(B) 
Retention and replanting of native vegetation shall occur wherever possible along the right-of-way improvement and resulting disturbance;
(4) 
Minor Utility Projects. Utility projects that have minor or short-duration impacts to critical areas, as determined by the director in accordance with the criteria below, and that do not significantly impact the function or values of a critical area(s); provided, that such projects are constructed with best management practices and additional restoration measures are provided. Minor activities shall not result in the transport of sediment or increased stormwater. Such allowed minor utility projects shall meet the following criteria:
(A) 
There is no practical alternative to the proposed activity with less impact on critical areas;
(B) 
The activity involves the placement of a utility pole, street signs, anchor, or vault or other small component of a utility facility; and
(C) 
The activity involves disturbance of an area less than 75 square feet;
(5) 
Public and Private Pedestrian Trails. Public and private pedestrian trails, subject to the following:
(A) 
The trail surface shall meet all other requirements including water quality standards set forth in the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington;
(B) 
Critical area and/or buffer widths shall be increased, where possible, equal to the width of the trail corridor, including disturbed areas;
(C) 
Trails proposed to be located in landslide or erosion hazard areas shall be constructed in a manner that does not increase the risk of landslide or erosion and in accordance with an approved geotechnical report; and
(D) 
Trails proposed to be located in wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, or their buffers, should be limited to permeable surfaces no more than five feet wide, located only in the outer 25 percent of a buffer, and located to avoid removal of significant trees;
(6) 
Select Vegetation Removal Activities. The following vegetation removal activities; provided, that no vegetation shall be removed from a critical area or its buffer without approval from the director:
(A) 
The removal of the following vegetation with hand labor and light equipment:
(i) 
Invasive and noxious weeds classified by the Washington State Noxious Weed Board;
(ii) 
English ivy (Hedera helix);
(iii) 
Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus, R. procerus); and
(iv) 
Evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus);
(B) 
The removal of trees from critical areas and buffers that are hazardous, posing a threat to public safety, or posing an imminent risk of damage to private property; provided, that:
(i) 
The applicant submits a report from a certified arborist, registered landscape architect, or professional forester that documents the hazard and provides a replanting schedule for the replacement trees;
(ii) 
Tree cutting shall be limited to pruning and crown thinning, unless otherwise justified by a qualified professional. Where pruning or crown thinning is not sufficient to address the hazard, trees should be removed or converted to wildlife snags;
(iii) 
All vegetation cut (tree stems, branches, etc.) shall be left within the critical area or buffer unless removal is warranted due to the potential for disease or pest transmittal to other healthy vegetation;
(iv) 
The landowner shall replace any trees that are removed with new trees at a ratio of two replacement trees for each tree removed (2:1) within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan. Replacement trees may be planted at a different nearby location if it can be determined that planting in the same location would create a new hazard or potentially damage the critical area. Replacement trees shall be species that are native and indigenous to the site and a minimum of one inch in diameter at breast height (dbh) for deciduous trees and a minimum of six feet in height for evergreen trees as measured from the top of the root ball;
(v) 
If a tree to be removed provides critical habitat, such as an eagle perch, a qualified wildlife biologist shall be consulted to determine timing and methods of removal that will minimize impacts; and
(vi) 
Hazard trees determined to pose an imminent threat or danger to public health or safety, to public or private property, or of serious environmental degradation may be removed or pruned by the landowner prior to receiving written approval from the city; provided, that within 14 days following such action, the landowner shall submit a restoration plan that demonstrates compliance with the provisions of this chapter;
(C) 
Measures to control a fire or halt the spread of disease or damaging insects consistent with the State Forest Practices Act, Chapter 76.09 RCW; provided, that the removed vegetation shall be replaced in-kind or with similar native species within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan; and
(D) 
Unless otherwise provided, or as a necessary part of an approved alteration, removal of any vegetation or woody debris from a habitat conservation area or wetland shall be prohibited;
(7) 
Chemical Applications. The application of herbicides, pesticides, organic or mineral-derived fertilizers, or other hazardous substances, if necessary, as approved by the city; provided, that their use shall be restricted in accordance with State Department of Fish and Wildlife management recommendations and the regulations of the State Department of Agriculture, the State Department of Ecology, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
(8) 
Minor Site Investigative Work. Work necessary for land use submittals, such as surveys, soil logs, percolation tests, and other related activities, where such activities do not require construction of new roads or significant amounts of excavation. In every case, impacts to the critical area shall be minimized and disturbed areas shall be immediately restored; and
(9) 
Boundary Markers. Construction or modification of boundary markers.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1574 § 1, 2016)
(a) 
As part of this review, the city shall:
(1) 
Verify the information submitted by the applicant;
(2) 
Evaluate the project area and vicinity for critical areas;
(3) 
Determine whether the proposed project is likely to impact the functions or values of critical areas; and
(4) 
Determine if the proposed project adequately addresses the impacts and avoids impacts to the critical area associated with the project.
(b) 
If the proposed project is within, adjacent to, or is likely to impact a critical area, the city shall:
(1) 
Require a critical area report from the applicant that has been prepared by a qualified professional;
(2) 
Review and evaluate the critical area report;
(3) 
Determine whether the development proposal conforms to the purposes and performance standards of the applicable critical areas chapters, including the review criteria in FMC § 22.92.230;
(4) 
Assess the potential impacts to the critical area and determine if they can be avoided or minimized; and
(5) 
Determine if any mitigation proposed by the applicant is sufficient to protect the functions and values of the critical area and public health, safety, and welfare concerns consistent with the goals, purposes, objectives, and requirements of the applicable critical areas chapters.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
Any person preparing to submit an application for development or use of land that may be regulated by the provisions of a critical areas chapter shall conduct a consultation meeting with the director prior to submitting an application for development or other approval. At this meeting, the director shall discuss the requirements of these chapters; provide critical area maps, scientific information, and other source materials; outline the review process; and work with the activity proponent to identify any potential concerns that might arise during the review process, in addition to discussing other permit procedures and requirements.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Submittal. Prior to the city's consideration of any proposed activity not found to be exempt under FMC § 22.92.080 or allowed pursuant to FMC § 22.92.110, the applicant shall submit to the department a complete critical area identification form on forms provided by the city.
(b) 
Site Inspection. Upon receipt of a project application and a critical area identification form, the director shall conduct a site inspection to review critical area conditions on site. The director shall notify the property owner of the inspection prior to the site visit. Reasonable access to the site shall be provided by the property owner for the purpose of inspections during any proposal review, restoration, emergency action, or monitoring period.
(c) 
Critical Area Identification Form Review Process. The director or his/her designee shall review the critical area identification form, conduct a site inspection, and review other information available pertaining to the site and the proposal and make a determination as to whether any critical areas may be affected by the proposal and if a more detailed critical area report shall be submitted.
(1) 
Decision Indicators. The director may use the following indicators to assist in determining the need for a critical area report:
(A) 
Indication of a critical area on the city critical areas maps that may be impacted by the proposed activity;
(B) 
Information and scientific opinions from appropriate agencies, including but not limited to the Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Resources, and Ecology;
(C) 
Documentation, from a scientific or other reasonable source, of the possible presence of a critical area; or
(D) 
A finding by a qualified professional or a reasonable belief by the director that a critical area may exist on or adjacent to the site of the proposed activity.
(d) 
Decision on Identification Form.
(1) 
No Critical Areas Present. If after a site visit the director's analysis indicates that the project area is not within or adjacent to a critical area or buffer and that the proposed activity is unlikely to degrade the functions or values of a critical area, then the director shall rule that the critical area review is complete and note on the identification form the reasons that no further review is required. A summary of this information shall be included in any staff report or decision on the underlying permit.
(2) 
Critical Areas Present, But No Impact – Waiver. If the director determines that there are critical areas within or adjacent to the project area, but that the best available science shows that the proposed activity is unlikely to degrade the functions or values of the critical area, the director may waive the requirement for a critical area report. A waiver may be granted if there is substantial evidence that all of the following requirements will be met:
(A) 
There will be no alteration of the critical area or buffer;
(B) 
The development proposal will not impact the critical area in a manner contrary to the purpose, intent, and requirements of the applicable critical areas chapter(s); and
(C) 
The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
A summary of this analysis and the findings shall be included in any staff report or decision on the underlying permit.
(3) 
Critical Areas May Be Affected by Proposal. If the director determines that a critical area or areas may be affected by the proposal, then the director shall notify the applicant that a critical area report must be submitted prior to further review of the project, and indicate each of the critical area types that should be addressed in the report.
(e) 
Director's Determination Subject to Reconsideration. A determination regarding the apparent absence of one or more critical areas by the director is not an expert certification regarding the presence of critical areas and the determination is subject to possible reconsideration and reopening if new information is received.
If the applicant wants greater assurance of the accuracy of the critical area review determination, the applicant may choose to hire a qualified professional to provide such assurances.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
The city shall notify the public of proposals in accordance with Chapter 22.07 FMC.
(a) 
If the director determines that no critical area report is necessary, the city shall state the reasons for this determination in the notice of application issued by the city for the proposal.
(b) 
If the director determines that there are critical areas on the site that the proposed project is unlikely to impact and the project meets the requirements for and has been granted a waiver from the requirement to complete a critical area report, a summary of the analysis and findings for this decision shall be stated in the notice of application for the proposal.
(c) 
If the director determines that critical areas may be affected by the proposal and a critical area report is required, public notice of the application shall include a description of the critical area that might be affected and state that a critical area report is required.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Preparation by Qualified Professional. If required by the director in accordance with FMC § 22.92.140(d)(3), the applicant shall submit a critical area report prepared by a qualified professional as defined herein.
(b) 
Incorporating of Best Available Science. The critical area report shall use scientifically valid methods and studies in the analysis of critical area data and field reconnaissance and reference the source of science used. The critical area report shall evaluate the proposal and all probable impacts to critical areas in accordance with the provisions of the applicable critical areas chapters.
(c) 
Minimum Report Contents. At a minimum, the report shall contain the following:
(1) 
The name and contact information of the applicant, a description of the proposal, and identification of the permit requested;
(2) 
A copy of the site plan for the development proposal including:
(A) 
A map to scale depicting critical areas, buffers, the development proposal, and any areas to be cleared; and
(B) 
A description of the proposed stormwater management plan for the development and consideration of impacts to drainage alterations;
(3) 
The dates, names, and qualifications of the persons preparing the report and documentation of any fieldwork performed on the site;
(4) 
Identification and characterization of all critical areas, wetlands, water bodies, and buffers adjacent to the proposed project area;
(5) 
A statement specifying the accuracy of the report, and all assumptions made and relied upon;
(6) 
An assessment of the probable cumulative impacts to critical areas resulting from development of the site and the proposed development;
(7) 
An analysis of site development alternatives including a no development alternative;
(8) 
A description of reasonable efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to FMC § 22.92.190 to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas;
(9) 
Plans for adequate mitigation, as needed, to offset any impacts, in accordance with FMC § 22.92.200, including, but not limited to:
(A) 
The impacts of any proposed development within or adjacent to a critical area or buffer on the critical area; and
(B) 
The impacts of any proposed alteration of a critical area or buffer on the development proposal, other properties and the environment;
(10) 
A discussion of the performance standards applicable to the critical area and proposed activity;
(11) 
Financial guarantees to ensure compliance; and
(12) 
Any additional information required for the critical area as specified in the corresponding chapter.
(d) 
Unless otherwise provided, a critical area report may be supplemented by or composed, in whole or in part, of any reports or studies required by other laws and regulations or previously prepared for and applicable to the development proposal site, as approved by the director.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Limitations to Study Area. The director may limit the required geographic area of the critical area report as appropriate if:
(1) 
The applicant, with assistance from the city, cannot obtain permission to access properties adjacent to the project area; or
(2) 
The proposed activity will affect only a limited part of the subject site.
(b) 
Modifications to Required Contents. The applicant may consult with the director prior to or during preparation of the critical area report to obtain city approval of modifications to the required contents of the report where, in the judgment of a qualified professional, more or less information is required to adequately address the potential critical area impacts and required mitigation.
(c) 
Additional Information Requirements. The director may require additional information to be included in the critical area report when determined to be necessary to the review of the proposed activity in accordance with the applicable critical areas chapters. Additional information that may be required includes, but is not limited to:
(1) 
Historical data, including original and subsequent mapping, aerial photographs, data compilations and summaries, and available reports and records relating to the site or past operations at the site;
(2) 
Grading and drainage plans; and
(3) 
Information specific to the type, location, and nature of the critical area.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
The applicant shall avoid all impacts that degrade the functions and values of a critical area or areas. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable critical areas chapter, if alteration to the critical area is unavoidable, all adverse impacts to or from critical areas and buffers resulting from a development proposal or alteration shall be mitigated using the best available science in accordance with an approved critical area report and SEPA documents, so as to result in no net loss of critical area functions and values.
(b) 
Unless it is demonstrated that a higher level of ecological functioning would result from an alternate approach such as the use of off-site mitigation, mitigation shall be in-kind and on-site, when possible, and sufficient to maintain the functions and values of the critical area, and to prevent risk from a hazard posed by a critical area.
(c) 
Mitigation shall not be implemented until after city approval of a critical area report that includes a mitigation plan, and mitigation shall be in accordance with the provisions of the approved critical area report.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1574 § 2, 2016)
Applicants shall demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to critical areas. When an alteration to a critical area is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized, or compensated for in the following sequential order of preference:
(a) 
Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
(b) 
Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps, such as project redesign, relocation, or timing, to avoid or reduce impacts;
(c) 
Rectifying the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and habitat conservation areas by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the historical conditions or the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project;
(d) 
Minimizing or eliminating the hazard by restoring or stabilizing the hazard area through engineered or other methods;
(e) 
Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action;
(f) 
Compensating for the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and habitat conservation areas by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and
(g) 
Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action when necessary.
Mitigation for individual actions may include a combination of the above measures.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
When mitigation is required, the applicant shall submit for approval by the city a mitigation plan as part of the critical area report. The mitigation plan shall include:
(a) 
Environmental Goals and Objectives. The mitigation plan shall include a written report identifying environmental goals and objectives of the compensation proposed and including:
(1) 
A description of the anticipated impacts to the critical areas and the mitigating actions proposed and the purposes of the compensation measures, including the site selection criteria; identification of compensation goals; identification of resource functions; and dates for beginning and completion of site compensation construction activities. The goals and objectives shall be related to the functions and values of the impacted critical area;
(2) 
A review of the best available science supporting the proposed mitigation and a description of the report author's experience to date in restoring or creating the type of critical area proposed; and
(3) 
An analysis of the likelihood of success of the compensation project.
(b) 
Performance Standards. The mitigation plan shall include measurable specific criteria for evaluating whether or not the goals and objectives of the mitigation project have been successfully attained and whether or not the requirements of the applicable critical areas chapters have been met.
(c) 
Detailed Construction Plans. The mitigation plan shall include written specifications and descriptions of the mitigation proposed, such as:
(1) 
The proposed construction sequence, timing, and duration;
(2) 
Grading and excavation details;
(3) 
Erosion and sediment control features;
(4) 
A planting plan specifying plant species, quantities, locations, size, spacing, and density; and
(5) 
Measures to protect and maintain plants until established.
These written specifications shall be accompanied by detailed site diagrams, scaled cross-sectional drawings, topographic maps showing slope percentage and final grade elevations, and any other drawings appropriate to show construction techniques or anticipated final outcome.
(d) 
Monitoring Program. The mitigation plan shall include a program for monitoring construction of the compensation project and for assessing a completed project. A protocol shall be included outlining the schedule for site monitoring (for example, monitoring shall occur in years one, two, three, five, seven and 10 after site construction), and how the monitoring data will be evaluated to determine if the performance standards are being met. A monitoring report shall be submitted as needed to document milestones, successes, problems, and contingency actions of the compensation project. The compensation project shall be monitored for a period necessary to establish that performance standards have been met, but not for a period less than five years, or 10 years for forested and scrub-shrub wetland communities.
(e) 
Contingency Plan. The mitigation plan shall include identification of potential courses of action, and any corrective measures to be taken if monitoring or evaluation indicates project performance standards are not being met.
(f) 
Financial Guarantees. The mitigation plan shall include financial guarantees, if necessary, to ensure that the mitigation plan is fully implemented. Financial guarantees ensuring fulfillment of the compensation project, monitoring program, and any contingency measures shall be posted in accordance with FMC § 22.92.350.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
The city may encourage, facilitate, and approve innovative mitigation projects that are based on the best available science. Advance mitigation or mitigation banking are examples of alternative mitigation projects allowed under the provisions of this section wherein one or more applicants, or an organization with demonstrated capability, may undertake a mitigation project together if it is demonstrated that all of the following circumstances exist:
(1) 
Creation or enhancement of a larger system of critical areas and open space is preferable to the preservation of many individual habitat areas;
(2) 
The group demonstrates the organizational and fiscal capability to act cooperatively;
(3) 
The group demonstrates that long-term management of the habitat area will be provided; and
(4) 
There is a clear potential for success of the proposed mitigation at the identified mitigation site.
(b) 
Conducting mitigation as part of a cooperative process does not reduce or eliminate the required replacement ratios.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
The director shall make a determination as to whether the proposed activity and mitigation, if any, is consistent with the provisions of the applicable critical areas chapters. The director's determination shall be based on the criteria of FMC § 22.92.230.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Any alteration to a critical area, unless otherwise provided for in the applicable critical areas chapters, shall be reviewed and approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on the proposal's ability to comply with all of the following criteria:
(1) 
The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with the mitigation sequencing order specified in FMC § 22.92.190;
(2) 
The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site;
(3) 
The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of the applicable critical areas chapters and the public interest;
(4) 
Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with FMC § 22.92.180;
(5) 
The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best available science and results in no net loss of critical area functions and values; and
(6) 
The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
(b) 
The city may condition the proposed activity as necessary to mitigate impacts to critical areas and to conform to the standards required by the applicable critical areas chapters.
(c) 
Except as provided for by the applicable critical areas chapters, any project that cannot adequately mitigate its impacts to critical areas in the sequencing order of preferences in FMC § 22.92.190 shall be denied.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
If the director determines that the proposed activity meets the criteria in FMC § 22.92.230 and complies with the applicable provisions of the applicable critical areas chapters, the director shall prepare a written notice of determination and identify any required conditions of approval. The notice of determination and conditions of approval shall be included in the project file and be considered in the next phase of the city's review of the proposed activity in accordance with any other applicable codes or regulations.
Any conditions of approval included in a notice of determination shall be attached to the underlying permit or approval. Any subsequent changes to the conditions of approval shall void the previous determination pending re-review of the proposal and conditions of approval by the director.
A favorable determination should not be construed as endorsement or approval of any underlying permit or approval.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
If the director determines that a proposed activity does not adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in FMC § 22.92.230 and the provisions of the applicable critical areas chapters, the director shall prepare written notice of the determination that includes findings of noncompliance.
No proposed activity or permit shall be approved or issued if it is determined that the proposed activity does not adequately mitigate its impacts on the critical areas and/or does not comply with the provisions of the applicable critical areas chapters.
Following notice of determination that the proposed activity does not meet the review criteria and/or does not comply with the applicable critical areas chapters, the applicant may request consideration of a revised critical area report. If the revision is found to be substantial and relevant to the critical area review, the director may reopen the critical area review and make a new determination based on the revised report.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
The city's determination regarding critical areas pursuant to the applicable critical areas chapters shall be final concurrent with the final decision to approve, condition, or deny the development proposal or other activity involved.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of a critical areas chapter may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure for the permit or approval involved.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Variances from the standards of a critical areas chapter may be authorized by the city in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 22.74 FMC. The director or hearing examiner, as authorized, shall review the request and make a written finding that the request meets or fails to meet the variance criteria.
(b) 
Variance Criteria. A variance may be granted only if the applicant demonstrates that the requested action conforms to all of the criteria set forth in FMC § 22.74.003 and as follows:
(1) 
A literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of all reasonable economic uses and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and zone of the subject property under the terms of this chapter, and the variance requested is the minimum necessary to provide the applicant with such rights;
(2) 
The granting of the variance is consistent with the general purpose and intent of this chapter, and will not further degrade the functions or values of the associated critical areas; and
(3) 
The decision to grant the variance includes the best available science and gives special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fish habitat.
(c) 
Conditions May Be Required. In granting any variance, the city may prescribe such conditions and safeguards as are necessary to secure adequate protection of critical areas from adverse impacts, and to ensure conformity with this chapter.
(d) 
Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to bring forth evidence in support of the application and upon which any decision has to be made on the application.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1638 § 62, 2019)
(a) 
When a critical area or its buffer has been altered in violation of a critical areas chapter, all ongoing development work shall stop and the critical area shall be restored. The city shall have the authority to issue a stop work order to cease all ongoing development work, and order restoration, rehabilitation, or replacement measures at the owner's or other responsible party's expense to compensate for violation of provisions of the applicable critical areas chapter.
(b) 
Requirement for Restoration Plan. All development work shall remain stopped until a restoration plan is prepared and approved by the city. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional using the best available science and shall describe how the actions proposed meet the minimum requirements described in subsection (c) of this section. The director shall, at the violator's expense, seek expert advice in determining the adequacy of the plan. Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant or violator for revision and resubmittal.
(c) 
Minimum Performance Standards for Restoration.
(1) 
For alterations to critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, wetlands, and habitat conservation areas, the following minimum performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a critical area; provided, that if the violator can demonstrate that greater functional and habitat values can be obtained, these standards may be modified:
(A) 
The historic structural and functional values shall be restored, including water quality and habitat functions;
(B) 
The historic soil types and configuration shall be replicated;
(C) 
The critical area and buffers shall be replanted with native vegetation that replicates the vegetation historically found on the site in species types, sizes, and densities. The historic functions and values should be replicated at the location of the alteration; and
(D) 
Information demonstrating compliance with the requirements in FMC § 22.92.250 shall be submitted to the director.
(2) 
For alterations to flood and geological hazards, the following minimum performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a critical area; provided, that if the violator can demonstrate that greater safety can be obtained, these standards may be modified:
(A) 
The hazard shall be reduced to a level equal to, or less than, the predevelopment hazard;
(B) 
Any risk of personal injury resulting from the alteration shall be eliminated or minimized; and
(C) 
The hazard area and buffers shall be replanted with native vegetation sufficient to minimize the hazard.
(d) 
Site Investigations. The director is authorized to make site inspections and take such actions as are necessary to enforce the city's critical areas regulations pursuant to Chapters 22.92, 22.93, 22.94, 22.95, 22.96, 22.97, 22.99, and 22.100 FMC. The director shall present proper credentials and make a reasonable effort to contact any property owner before entering onto private property.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
The boundary at the outer edge of critical area tracts and easements shall be delineated with permanent survey stakes, using iron or concrete markers as established by local survey standards.
(b) 
The boundary at the outer edge of the critical area or buffer shall be identified with temporary signs prior to any site alteration. Such temporary signs shall be replaced with permanent signs prior to occupancy or use of the site.
(c) 
These provisions may be modified by the director as necessary to ensure protection of sensitive features or wildlife needs.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
In order to inform subsequent purchasers of real property of the existence of critical areas, the owner of any property containing a critical area or buffer on which a development proposal is submitted shall file a notice with the county auditor according to the direction of the city. The notice shall state the presence of the critical area or buffer on the property, the application of the critical areas regulations to the property, and the fact that limitations on actions in or affecting the critical area or buffer may exist. The notice shall "run with the land."
(b) 
This title notice shall not be required for a development proposal by a public agency or public or private utility:
(1) 
Within a recorded easement or right-of-way;
(2) 
Where the agency or utility has been adjudicated the right to an easement or right-of-way; or
(3) 
On the site of a permanent public facility.
(c) 
The applicant shall submit proof that the notice has been filed for public record before the city approves any site development or construction for the property or, in the case of subdivisions, short subdivisions, and planned unit developments, at or before recording.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Unless otherwise required in the applicable critical areas chapters, native growth protection areas shall be used in development proposals for subdivisions, short subdivisions, and planned unit developments to delineate and protect those contiguous critical areas and buffers listed below:
(1) 
All landslide hazard areas and buffers;
(2) 
All wetlands and buffers;
(3) 
All habitat conservation areas; and
(4) 
All other lands to be protected from alterations as conditioned by project approval.
(b) 
Native growth protection areas shall be recorded on all documents of title of record for all affected lots.
(c) 
Native growth protection areas shall be designated on the face of the plat of recorded drawing in a format approved by the city. The designation shall include the following restrictions:
(1) 
An assurance that native vegetation will be preserved for the purpose of preventing harm to property and the environment, including, but not limited to, controlling surface water runoff and erosion, maintaining slope stability, buffering, and protecting plants, fish, and animal habitat; and
(2) 
The right of the city to enforce the terms of the restriction.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
Critical area tracts shall be used in development proposals for subdivisions, short subdivisions, and planned unit developments to delineate and protect those contiguous critical areas and buffers listed below that total 5,000 or more square feet:
(1) 
All landslide hazard areas and buffers;
(2) 
All wetlands and buffers;
(3) 
All habitat conservation areas; and
(4) 
All other lands to be protected from alterations as conditioned by project approval.
(b) 
Critical area tracts shall be recorded on all documents of title of record for all affected lots.
(c) 
Critical area tracts shall be designated on the face of the plat or recorded drawing in a format approved by the city. The designation shall include the following restriction:
(1) 
An assurance that native vegetation will be preserved for the purpose of preventing harm to property and the environment, including, but not limited to, controlling surface water runoff and erosion, maintaining slope stability, buffering, and protecting plants, fish, and animal habitat; and
(2) 
The right of the city to enforce the terms of the restriction.
(d) 
The city may require that any required critical area tract be dedicated to the city, held in an undivided interest by each owner of a building lot within the development with the ownership interest passing with the ownership of the lot, or held by an incorporated homeowner's association or other legal entity (such as a land trust, which ensures the ownership, maintenance, and protection of the tract).
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
Unless otherwise provided, buildings and other structures shall be set back a distance of 15 feet from the edges of all critical area buffers or from the edges of all critical areas, if no buffers are required. The following may be allowed in the building setback area:
(a) 
Landscaping;
(b) 
Uncovered decks;
(c) 
Building overhangs, if such overhangs do not extend more than 18 inches into the setback area; and
(d) 
Impervious and pervious ground surfaces, such as driveways and patios; provided, that such improvements may be subject to water quality regulations as adopted in the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
(a) 
When mitigation required pursuant to a development proposal is not completed prior to the city final permit approval, such as final plat approval or final building inspection, the city shall require the applicant to post a performance bond or other security in a form and amount deemed acceptable by the city. If the development proposal is subject to mitigation, the applicant shall post a mitigation bond or other security in a form and amount deemed acceptable by the city to ensure mitigation is fully functional.
(b) 
The bond shall be in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated cost of the uncompleted actions or the estimated cost of restoring the functions and values of the critical area that are at risk, whichever is greater.
(c) 
The bond shall be in the form of a surety bond, performance bond, assignment of a savings account, or an irrevocable letter of credit guaranteed by an acceptable financial institution with terms and conditions acceptable to the city attorney.
(d) 
Bonds or other security authorized by this section shall remain in effect until the city determines, in writing, that the standards bonded for have been met. Bonds or other security shall be held by the city for a minimum of five years to ensure that the required mitigation has been fully implemented and demonstrated to function, and may be held for longer periods when necessary.
(e) 
Depletion, failure, or collection of bond funds shall not discharge the obligation of an applicant or violator to complete required mitigation, maintenance, monitoring, or restoration.
(f) 
Public development proposals shall be relieved from having to comply with the bonding requirements of this section if public funds have previously been committed for mitigation, maintenance, monitoring, or restoration.
(g) 
Any failure to satisfy critical area requirements established by law or condition including, but not limited to, the failure to provide a monitoring report within 30 days after it is due or comply with other provisions of an approved mitigation plan shall constitute a default, and the city may demand payment of any financial guarantees or require other action authorized by the city code or any other law.
(h) 
Any funds recovered pursuant to this section shall be used to complete the required mitigation.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)
Reasonable access to the site shall be provided to the city, state, and federal agency review staff for the purpose of inspections during any proposal review, restoration, emergency action, or monitoring period.
(Ord. 1375 § 1, 2005)