Shoreline modification involves developments that provide bank stabilization or flood control. The purpose of the modification is to reduce adverse impacts caused by natural processes, such as current, flood, tides, wind, or wave action. Shoreline modification includes all structural and nonstructural means to reduce flooding and/or erosion of banks.
Nonstructural methods include setbacks of permanent and temporary structures, relocation of the structure to be protected, ground water management, planning, bioengineering or “soft” engineered solutions, and regulatory measures to avoid the need for structural stabilization.
“Hard” structural stabilization measures refer to those with solid, hard surfaces, such as concrete bulkheads, while “soft” structural measures rely on natural materials such as biotechnical vegetation or beach enhancement. Generally, the harder the construction measure, the greater the impact on shoreline processes, including sediment transport, geomorphology, and biological functions. New structural shoreline stabilization also often results in vegetation removal, as well as damage to nearshore habitat and shoreline corridors. There are a range of measures varying from soft to hard that include:
• | Vegetation enhancement; |
• | Upland drainage control; |
• | Biotechnical measures; |
• | Beach enhancement; |
• | Anchor trees; |
• | Gravel placement; |
• | Rock revetments; |
• | Gabions; |
• | Concrete groins; |
• | Retaining walls and bluff walls; and/or |
• | Bulkheads. |
A.
Shoreline Modification Policies – General.
1.
Biostabilization and other bank stabilization measures should be located, designed, and constructed primarily to prevent damage to the existing primary structure.
2.
All new development should be located and designed to prevent or minimize the need for shoreline stabilization measures and flood protection works. New development requiring shoreline stabilization shall be discouraged in areas where no preexisting shoreline stabilization is present.
3.
Shoreline modifications are only allowed for mitigation or enhancement purposes, or when and where there is a demonstrated necessity to support or protect an existing primary structure or legally existing shoreline use that is otherwise in danger of loss or substantial damage.
4.
Proposals for shoreline modifications should be designed to protect life and property without impacting shoreline resources.
5.
Shoreline modifications that are natural in appearance, compatible with ongoing shoreline processes, and provide flexibility for long-term management, such as protective berms or vegetative stabilization, should be encouraged over structural means such as concrete bulkheads or extensive revetments, where feasible.
6.
Structural solutions to reduce shoreline damage should be allowed only after it is demonstrated that nonstructural solutions would not be able to withstand the erosive forces of the current and waves.
7.
The design of bank stabilization or protection works should provide for the long-term, multiple use of shoreline resources and public access to public shorelines.
8.
In the design of publicly financed or subsidized works, consideration should be given to providing pedestrian access to shorelines for low impact outdoor recreation.
9.
All flood protection measures should be placed landward of the natural flood boundary, including wetlands that are directly interrelated and interdependent with water bodies.
10.
If, through construction and/or maintenance of shoreline modification developments, the loss of vegetation and wildlife habitat will occur, mitigation should be required.
11.
Existing, previously permitted stabilization measures, such as bulkheads and retaining walls, are considered engineered and abated hazards and shall not be classified as geologic hazard areas.
B.
Shoreline Modification Regulations – General.
1.
All new development, uses or activities within the shoreline area shall be located and designed to prevent or minimize the need for bank stabilization and flood protection works.
2.
Permitted and shoreline conditional use requirements for bulkheads and revetments are specified in this chapter. All other forms of shoreline modification, except soft shore, must be approved as a shoreline conditional use within all shoreline environments.
3.
All shoreline stabilization proposals require a geotechnical analysis.
4.
All shoreline development and activity shall be located, designed, constructed, and managed in a manner that mitigates impacts to the environment. The preferred mitigation sequence (avoid, minimize, mitigate, compensate) shall follow that listed in SMC § 20.230.020(A).
5.
New non-water-dependent development, including single-family residences, that includes structural shoreline stabilization shall not be allowed unless all of the conditions below apply; otherwise new stabilization measures are limited to protecting only existing developments:
a.
The need to protect the development from destruction due to erosion caused by natural processes, such as currents and waves, is demonstrated through a geotechnical/hydrogeological report prepared by a City-approved qualified professional.
b.
The erosion is not caused by upland conditions, such as the loss of vegetation and/or drainage issues.
c.
There will be no net loss of shoreline ecological functions or impacts to adjacent or down-current properties.
d.
Nonstructural measures, such as placing the development further from the shoreline, planting vegetation, or installing on-site drainage improvements and soft structural solutions such as bioengineering, are not feasible or not sufficient.
e.
The structure will not cause adverse impacts to the functions and values of critical areas or properly functioning conditions for proposed, threatened, and endangered species.
f.
Other mitigation/restoration measures are included in the proposal.
6.
Upon project completion, all disturbed shoreline areas shall be restored to as near pre-project configuration as possible and replanted with appropriate vegetation. All losses in riparian vegetation or wildlife habitat shall be mitigated at a ratio of 1:1.25 (habitat lost to habitat replaced).
7.
Shoreline stabilization and flood protection works are prohibited in wetlands and on point and channel bars. They are also prohibited in fish spawning areas.
8.
Developments shall not reduce the volume and storage capacity of streams and adjacent wetlands or flood plains.
9.
Use of refuse for the stabilization of shorelines is prohibited.
(Ord. 668 § 4 (Exh. 3), 2013; Ord. 856 § 2 (Exh. A), 2019)