In its evaluation of quality of design, the city planner and the planning commission shall apply the following criteria among others:
A.
To the extent feasible, signs shall be graphic and nonverbal, with the design emphasis on simplicity, style trademarks, business identification and symbols rather than on extensive wording and advertising messages.
B.
Sign proliferation creates a busy, unpleasant atmosphere and shall be avoided. Good design calls for thoughtful coordination of all signs, in a lesser rather than greater number of locations on the premises.
C.
Signs shall relate to the architectural design of the building. Signs which cover windows, or which spill over natural boundaries or architectural features and obliterate parts of upper floors of buildings are a menace to visual order and shall not be permitted.
D.
The typical plastic-faced sign with white, internally illuminated background shall be discouraged; dark backgrounds with the letters or design lighter to reduce the glare and the resulting bland night-lighting effect are preferred. Sign illumination shall be designed so as to avoid glare and light intrusion onto other signs or premises.
E.
Neon shall be carefully and sparingly used in signs to avoid blatancy and garishness. Neon is usually better used in symbols or design than for lettering.
F.
Good signs can become bad signs by installation on thoughtlessly contrived or overpowering structures. Careful consideration shall be given to minimize and simplify every sign's supporting structure.
G.
The city planner may make design and structure exemptions if the proposed sign attempts to duplicate signs used in certain historical periods: for example, the exposed light bulbs used in the late Victorian period, and the wall-painted sign incorporated into the design facade of the art deco.
(Ord. 77-12 N.S. Appendix III, 1977)
