In order to obtain an initial or renewal franchise, an operator of an open video system must apply for a franchise. The application must contain the following information, and such information as the city may from time to time require:
A.
Identity of the applicant, the persons who exercise working control over the applicant, and the persons who control those persons, to the ultimate parent.
B.
A proposal for construction of the open video system that includes at least the following:
1.
A description of the services that are to be provided over the facility.
2.
Identification of the area of the city to be served by the proposed system, including a description of the proposed franchise area's boundaries.
3.
The location of proposed facility and facility design, including a description of the miles of plant to be installed, and a description of the size of equipment cabinets, shielding and electronics that will be installed along the plant route, the power sources that will be used and a description of the noise, exhaust and pollutants, if any, that will be generated by the operation of the same; provided, however, that, if some of the descriptive data is not available at the time of application, the franchise may be issued subject to conditions that the data be filed and approved by the city before construction begins and that the franchise will be deemed to be forfeited if the data is not supplied and approved; provided, further, that the foregoing proviso does not authorize the grant of a franchise where there is not sufficient information to appraise the impact of the applicant's proposal; provided further, in the event that this subsection and subsection (B)(4) of this section require information that is a business or trade secret and/or proprietary information and the operation wishes to protect the information against disclosure, then operator shall provide said information to city in a separate envelope marked "Proprietary Information: DO NOT DISCLOSE." The city will exercise good faith efforts to protect the confidentiality of the business or trade secrets or proprietary information that is designated as such; provided further, that (a) in the event a public disclosure request is made for information marked as proprietary, and if the city attorney determines that said information may be subject to being disclosed, or (b) the city determines that the information should be disclosed in connection with its enforcement of any provision of this title, or in the exercise of its police or regulatory powers, then the city shall notify the operator of the operator's opportunity to seek a protective order from a court with appropriate jurisdiction. In the event that a protective order is not obtained within 30 days or, if shorter, the time limitation set forth in state law, then city may disclose said information. The operator is obligated to reimburse and indemnify city for all costs, damages and attorney fees that may be awarded or assessed by the court for any actions the city took at the request of operator.
4.
A map of the route the facility will follow, a designation of the portions of the system that will be placed above ground and the portions that will be placed underground, and the construction techniques that the operator proposes to use in installing the system above ground and underground, a schedule for construction of the facility, describing when and where construction will begin, how it will proceed, and when it will be completed, and the expected effect on right-of-way usage, including information on the ability of the public rights-of-way to accommodate the proposed system, including, as appropriate given the system proposed, an estimate of the availability of space in conduits and an estimate of the cost of any necessary rearrangement of existing facilities; provided, however, that any proprietary information required under this subsection as well as the preceding subsection shall be subject to the nondisclosure procedure prescribed in the proviso of the preceding subsection.
C.
A description, where appropriate, of how services will be converted from existing facilities to new facilities, and what will be done with existing facilities.
D.
Evidence satisfactory to the city that the applicant has the financial resources to complete the proposed project, and to construct, operate and maintain the proposed facility over the franchise term. It is not the intent of the city to require an applicant to prove that the services it proposed to offer will succeed in the marketplace.
E.
Evidence satisfactory to the city that applicant is technically qualified to construct, operate and maintain the proposed facility. At a minimum, the applicant must show that it has experience or resources to ensure that work is to be performed adequately, and can respond to emergencies during and after construction is complete.
F.
Evidence satisfactory to the city that the applicant is legally qualified, which proof must include a demonstration that the applicant:
1.
Has received, or is in a position to receive, necessary authorizations from state and federal authorities;
2.
Has not engaged in conduct (fraud, racketeering, violation of antitrust laws, consumer protection laws, or similar laws) that allows city to conclude the applicant cannot be relied upon to comply with requirements of franchise, or provisions of this title;
3.
Is willing to accept a franchise, to pay required compensation and to abide by the provisions of applicable law, including those relating to the construction, operation or maintenance of its facilities, and has not entered into any agreement that would prevent it from doing so.
G.
An affidavit or declaration of the applicant or authorized officer thereof certifying the truth and accuracy of the information in the application, and certifying that the application meets all requirements of applicable law.
H.
An applicant may show that it would be inappropriate to deny it a franchise under subsection (F)(2) of this section, by virtue of the particular circumstances surrounding the acts or omissions at issue, the steps taken by the applicant to cure all harms flowing therefrom and to prevent their recurrence, and the lack of involvement of the applicant's principals, or the remoteness of the acts or omissions from the operation of open video system facilities.
(Ord. 1402 § 1(11.03.1.1), 2001)