In addition to the substantive requirements of PMC §
23.10.130, the following shall apply to habitat conservation areas. Within Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction, the additional regulations and procedures of PMC Title
21 shall also apply:
A. No plant, wildlife, or fish species not indigenous to the region shall be introduced into a habitat conservation area except with approval of a state or federal agency with expertise.
B. Preference in mitigation shall be given to contiguous wildlife habitat corridors.
C. In reviewing development proposals, the city shall seek opportunities to restore degraded riparian fish and wildlife functions such as breeding, rearing, migration, and feeding.
D. The city shall require buffers of undisturbed native vegetation adjacent to habitat conservation areas as necessary. Buffer widths shall reflect the sensitivity of the habitat and may reflect the intensity of nearby human activity.
E. When a species is more sensitive to human activity during a specific season of the year, the city may establish an extra outer buffer from which human activity is excluded during said season.
F. No development shall be allowed within a habitat conservation area or buffer with which state or federal endangered, threatened, or sensitive species have a primary association, except in exchange for restoration as approved by the director or as provided in a management plan approved by a state or federal agency with appropriate expertise.
G. When a development permit is applied for on land containing or adjacent to a bald eagle nest or communal roost, the city shall notify the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and otherwise comply with WAC
232-12-292.
H. No development shall be permitted which degrades the functions or values of anadromous fish habitat, including structures or fills which impact migration or spawning.
I. Construction and other activities shall be seasonally restricted as necessary to protect the resource. Activities shall be timed to occur during work windows designated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for applicable fish species.
J. Shoreline erosion control shall use bioengineering methods or soft armoring in accordance with an approved critical areas report.
K. In addition to the substantive requirements of PMC §
23.10.130, the following shall apply to habitat conservation areas. Within shoreline jurisdiction the additional regulations and procedures of PMC Title
21 shall also apply.
Table 23.60.050(K)(1) establishes the width of stream buffers (also known as riparian habitat areas) that shall apply to each stream type. Widths shall be measured outward in each direction, on the horizontal plane, from the ordinary high water mark, or from the top of bank if the ordinary high water mark cannot be identified, or from the outer edge of the channel migration zone when present. For buffer widths for the Type S stream types (under Shoreline Management Act jurisdiction), see Table 23.60.050(K)(2).
Table 23.60.050(K)(1) |
|---|
DNR Stream Type | Streams of This Type in Pacific | Standard Buffer Width | Minimum Modified Buffer Width |
|---|
Type S (subject to Shoreline Management Act) | | | |
Type F (fish-bearing other than S) | • Jovita Creek • Milwaukee Ditch south of 5th Ave. S.W. | 100 feet | 75 feet |
Type Np (nonfish, perennial) | • Milwaukee Ditch, middle portion • Boeing Ditch | 50 feet | 35 feet |
Type Ns (nonfish, seasonal) | • Milwaukee Ditch east of Tacoma Blvd. | 25 feet | 20 feet |
Table 23.60.050(K)(2) |
|---|
Shoreline Environment | Standard Buffer Width | Administrative Modified Buffer Width1 | Conditional Use Modified Buffer Width2 |
|---|
Type S (subject to Shoreline Management Act) | | | |
Urban Conservancy | 200 | 100 | 503 |
Shoreline Residential | 100 | 204 | 104 |
Shoreline Recreation | | | |
Water-Dependent Use | 100 | 05 | NA |
Water-Oriented Use | 100 | 50 | 25 |
Other Use | 100 | 75 | 50 |
Shoreline Commercial | | | |
Water-Dependent Use | 100 | 05 | NA |
Water-Oriented Use | 100 | 50 | 25 |
Other Use | 100 | 75 | 50 |
1 Administrative modification of buffer width shall be processed in accordance with the criteria of subsection M of this section. |
2 Conditional use permit modification of buffer width shall be processed in accordance with the criteria and procedures of PMC § 21.50.160. |
3 Limited to utility, transportation and essential public facilities for which there is no feasible alternative; and provided, that facilities that must cross the water may locate facilities within the buffer provided mitigation for ecological impacts is implemented. |
4 Modification limited to subdivisions existing prior to 1975. |
5 May be approved only in conjunction with a shoreline substantial development permit or conditional use permit. |
L. The director may impose greater than the standard buffer widths as necessary to fully protect riparian functions. For example, the buffer may be extended to the outer edge of the floodplain or windward into an area of high tree blow-down potential.
M. The director may approve a buffer width no less than the "minimum modified buffer width" in the above table when the full width is unnecessary to fully protect riparian functions, or in exchange for restoration of degraded areas in accordance with an approved plan, or for buffer averaging in accordance with PMC §
23.10.130(G).
N. When conformance to this title would prohibit land uses allowed by the city's shoreline management master program, such as bulkheads, launching ramps, docks, roads, trails, or bridges, the city shall resolve the conflict by allowing said uses with reasonable protections to minimize loss of natural functions and values.
O. To the extent facilities are allowed in habitat conservation areas, the following regulations shall apply. Within shoreline jurisdiction the additional regulations and procedures of PMC Title 21 shall also apply:
1. Trails other than those within the White/Stuck River network shall be on the outer edge of the stream buffer, except for limited viewing platforms and crossings designed to be "environmentally friendly" and utilizing best management practices. Trails and platforms shall be of pervious materials as far as possible.
2. Road bridges and culverts shall be designed according to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Passage Design at Road Culverts, 1999, and the National Marine Fisheries Service Guidelines for Salmonid Passage at Stream Crossings, 2000.
3. Utility lines shall be accomplished by boring beneath the scour depth and hyporheic zone (the saturated zone beneath and adjacent to streams that filters nutrients and maintains water quality). Utilities shall avoid paralleling streams or changing the natural rate of shore or channel migration.
4. New and expanded public flood protection measures shall require a biological assessment approved by the agency responsible for protecting federally listed species.
5. In-stream structures such as high-flow bypasses, sediment ponds, instream ponds, retention and detention facilities, tide gates, dams, and weirs shall be allowed only as part of an approved restoration project.
6. Storm water conveyance structures shall incorporate fish habitat features and the sides of open channels and ponds shall be vegetated to retard erosion, filter sediments, and shade the water.
(Ord. 1592 § 1, 2004; Ord. 2002 § 5 (Exh. C § 6), 2019)