Any application for a small wireless facility both inside and outside of the right-of-way shall comply with the application requirements for a small wireless facility permit described in YPMC § 13.04.530.
(Ord. 694 § 2, 2019)
Small wireless facility deployments whether permitted in the right-of way under Chapter 13.04 YPMC or permitted in accordance with this chapter shall conform to the following design standards:
A.
Small wireless facilities attached to existing or replacement nonwooden light poles and other nonwooden poles in the right-of-way or nonwooden poles outside of the right-of-way shall conform to the following design criteria:
1.
Antennas and the associated equipment enclosures (including disconnect switches and other appurtenant devices) shall be fully concealed within the pole, unless such concealment is otherwise technically infeasible, or is incompatible with the pole design, then the antennas and associated equipment enclosures must be camouflaged to appear as an integral part of the pole or flush mounted to the pole, meaning no more than six inches off of the pole, and must be the minimum size necessary for the intended purpose, not to exceed the volumetric dimensions of small wireless facilities. If the equipment enclosure is permitted on the exterior of the pole, the applicant is required to place the equipment enclosure behind any banners or road signs that may be on the pole; provided, that such location does not interfere with the operation of the banners or signs.
2.
The furthest point of any antenna or equipment enclosure may not extend more than 20 inches from the face of the pole.
3.
All conduit, cables, wires and fiber must be routed internally in the light pole. Full concealment of all conduit, cables, wires and fiber is required within mounting brackets, shrouds, canisters or sleeves if attaching to exterior antennas or equipment.
4.
An antenna on top of an existing pole may not extend more than the minimum necessary as supported by engineering evidence or in any event no more than 10 feet above the height of the existing pole and the diameter may not exceed 16 inches, measured at the top of the pole, unless the applicant can demonstrate that more space is needed. The antennas shall be integrated into the pole design so that it appears as a continuation of the original pole, including colored or painted to match the pole, and shall be shrouded or screened to blend with the pole except for canister antennas which shall not require screening. All cabling and mounting hardware/brackets from the bottom of the antenna to the top of the pole shall be fully concealed and integrated with the pole.
5.
Any replacement pole shall substantially conform to the design of the pole it is replacing or the neighboring pole design standards utilized within the contiguous right-of-way.
6.
The height of any replacement pole may not extend more than 10 feet above the height of the existing pole or the minimum additional height necessary, provided no additional height is allowed for the antenna installation.
7.
The diameter of a replacement pole shall comply with the town's setback and sidewalk clearance requirements and shall, to the extent technically feasible, be no larger than to accommodate three interior conduits or not more than a 25 percent increase of the existing nonwooden pole measured at the base of the pole, whichever is greater, unless additional diameter is needed in order to conceal equipment within the base of the pole, and shall comply with the requirements in subsection (E)(4) of this section.
8.
The use of the pole for the siting of a small wireless facility shall be considered secondary to the primary function of the pole. If the primary function of a pole serving as the host site for a small wireless facility becomes unnecessary, the pole shall not be retained for the sole purpose of accommodating the small wireless facility and the small wireless facility and all associated equipment shall be removed.
a.
In the event that the pole serving as the host for a small wireless facility becomes unnecessary and the small wireless facility must be removed, the applicant shall first attempt to site the small wireless facility on a remaining utility pole and may install a new pole at that same location consistent with the requirements contained in YPMC § 17.30.160 only if such other suitable location does not exist.
B.
Wooden Pole Design Standards. Small wireless facilities located on wooden poles shall conform to the following design criteria:
1.
The wooden pole at the proposed location may be replaced with a taller pole for the purpose of accommodating a small wireless facility; provided, that the replacement pole shall not exceed a height that is a maximum of 10 feet taller than the existing pole, unless a further height increase is required and confirmed in writing by the pole owner and that such height extension is the minimum extension possible to provide sufficient separation and/or clearance from electrical and wireline facilities.
2.
A pole extender may be used instead of replacing an existing pole but may not increase the height of the existing pole by more than 10 feet, unless a further height increase is required and confirmed in writing by the pole owner and that such height increase is the minimum extension possible to provide sufficient separation and/or clearance from electrical and wireline facilities. A "pole extender" as used herein is an object affixed between the pole and the antenna for the purpose of increasing the height of the antenna above the pole. The pole extender shall be painted to approximately match the color of the pole and shall substantially match the diameter of the pole measured at the top of the pole.
3.
Replacement wooden poles must either match the approximate color and materials of the replaced pole or shall be the standard new wooden pole used by the pole owner in the town.
4.
Antennas, equipment enclosures, and all ancillary equipment, boxes and conduit shall be colored or painted to match the approximate color of the surface of the wooden pole on which they are attached.
5.
Panel antennas shall not be mounted more than 12 inches from the surface of the wooden pole.
6.
Antennas should be placed in an effort to minimize visual clutter and obtrusiveness. Multiple antennas are permitted on a wooden pole; provided, that each antenna enclosure shall not be more than three cubic feet in volume.
7.
A canister antenna may be mounted on top of an existing wooden pole, which may not exceed the height requirements described in subsection (B)(1) of this section. A canister antenna mounted on the top of a wooden pole shall not exceed 16 inches, measured at the top of the pole, and shall be colored or painted to match the pole. The canister antenna must be placed to look as if it is an extension of the pole. In the alternative, the applicant may propose a side-mounted canister antenna, so long as the inside edge of the antenna is no more than 12 inches from the surface of the wooden pole. All cables shall be concealed either within the canister antenna or within a sleeve between the antenna and the wooden pole.
8.
The furthest point of any antenna or equipment enclosure may not extend more than 20 inches from the face of the pole.
9.
An omnidirectional antenna may be mounted on the top of an existing wooden pole, provided such antenna is no more than four feet in height and is mounted directly on the top of a pole or attached to a sleeve made to look like the exterior of the pole as close to the top of the pole as technically feasible. All cables shall be concealed within the sleeve between the bottom of the antenna and the mounting bracket.
10.
All related equipment, including but not limited to ancillary equipment, radios, cables, associated shrouding, microwaves, and conduit which are mounted on wooden poles, shall not have an inside edge further than six inches from the surface of the pole, unless a further distance is technically required, and is confirmed in writing by the pole owner.
11.
Equipment for small wireless facilities must be attached to the wooden pole, unless otherwise permitted to be ground mounted pursuant to subsection (E)(1) of this section. The equipment must be placed in the smallest enclosure possible for the intended purpose. The equipment enclosure and all other wireless equipment associated with the utility pole, including wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any preexisting associated equipment on the pole, may not exceed 28 cubic feet. Multiple equipment enclosures may be acceptable if designed to more closely integrate with the pole design and does not cumulatively exceed 28 cubic feet. The applicant is encouraged to place the equipment enclosure behind any banners or road signs that may be on the pole; provided, that such location does not interfere with the operation of the banners or signs.
12.
An applicant who desires to enclose both its antennas and equipment within one unified enclosure may do so; provided, that such enclosure is the minimum size necessary for its intended purpose and the enclosure and all other wireless equipment associated with the pole, including wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any preexisting associated equipment on the pole does not exceed 28 cubic feet. To the extent possible, the unified enclosure shall be placed so as to appear as an integrated part of the pole or behind banners or signs. The unified enclosure may not be placed more than six inches from the surface of the pole, unless a further distance is required and confirmed in writing by the pole owner. To the extent possible, unified enclosure shall be placed so as to appear as an integrated part of the pole or behind any banners or signs that may be on the pole; provided, that such location does not interfere with the operation of the banners or signs.
13.
The visual effect of the small wireless facility on all other aspects of the appearance of the wooden pole shall be minimized to the greatest extent possible.
14.
The use of the wooden pole for the siting of a small wireless facility shall be considered secondary to the primary function of the pole. If the primary function of a pole serving as the host site for a small wireless facility becomes unnecessary, the pole shall not be retained for the sole purpose of accommodating the small wireless facility and the small wireless facility and all associated equipment shall be removed.
a.
In the event that the pole serving as the host for a small wireless facility becomes unnecessary and the small wireless facility must be removed, the applicant shall first attempt to site the small wireless facility on a remaining utility pole and may install a new pole at that same location consistent with the requirements contained in YPMC § 17.30.160 only if such other suitable location does not exist.
15.
The diameter of a replacement pole shall comply with the town's setback and sidewalk clearance requirements and shall not be more than a 25 percent increase of the existing utility pole measured at the base of the pole.
16.
All cables and wires shall be routed through conduit along the outside of the pole. The outside conduit shall be colored or painted to match the pole. The number of conduits shall be minimized to the number technically necessary to accommodate the small wireless facility.
C.
Small wireless facilities attached to existing buildings shall conform to the following design criteria:
1.
Small wireless facilities may be mounted to the sides of a building if the antennas do not interrupt the building's architectural theme.
2.
The interruption of architectural lines or horizontal or vertical reveals is discouraged.
3.
New architectural features such as columns, pilasters, corbels, or other ornamentation that conceal antennas may be used if it complements the architecture of the existing building.
4.
Small wireless facilities shall utilize the smallest mounting brackets necessary in order to provide the smallest offset from the building.
5.
Skirts or shrouds shall be utilized on the sides and bottoms of antennas in order to conceal mounting hardware, create a cleaner appearance, and minimize the visual impact of the antennas. Exposed cabling/wiring is prohibited.
6.
Small wireless facilities shall be painted and textured to match the adjacent building surfaces.
D.
Small wireless facilities mounted on cables strung between existing utility poles shall conform to the following standards:
1.
Each strand-mounted facility shall not exceed three cubic feet in volume;
2.
Only one strand-mounted facility is permitted per cable between any two existing poles;
3.
The strand-mounted devices shall be placed as close as possible to the nearest utility pole, in no event more than five feet from the pole unless a greater distance is technically necessary or is required by the pole owner for safety clearance;
4.
No strand-mounted device shall be located in or above the portion of the roadway open to vehicular traffic;
5.
Ground-mounted equipment to accommodate a shared mounted facility is not permitted except when placed in preexisting equipment cabinets;
7.
Such strand-mounted devices must be installed to cause the least visual impact, be outside the view of a single-family residence, and without excess exterior cabling or wires (other than the original strand); and
8.
Strand-mounted facilities are prohibited on nonwooden poles.
E.
General Requirements.
1.
Ground-mounted equipment in the rights-of-way is prohibited, unless such facilities are placed underground or the applicant can demonstrate that pole-mounted or undergrounded equipment is technically infeasible. If ground-mounted equipment is necessary, then the applicant shall submit a concealment element plan. Generators located in the rights-of-way are prohibited.
4.
Replacement poles and new poles shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), town construction and sidewalk clearance standards, town ordinance, and state and federal laws and regulations in order to provide a clear and safe passage within the rights-of-way. Further, the location of any replacement or new pole must: be physically possible, comply with applicable traffic warrants, not interfere with utility or safety fixtures (e.g., fire hydrants, traffic control devices), and not adversely affect the public welfare, health or safety.
5.
Replacement poles shall be located as near as possible to the existing pole with the requirement to remove the abandoned pole.
6.
No signage, message or identification other than the manufacturer's identification or identification required by governing law is allowed to be portrayed on any antenna or equipment enclosure. Any permitted signage shall be located on the equipment enclosures and be of the minimum amount possible to achieve the intended purpose (no larger than four by six inches); provided, that signs are permitted as concealment element techniques where appropriate.
7.
Antennas and related equipment shall not be illuminated except for security reasons, required by a federal or state authority, or unless approved as part of a concealment element plan.
8.
Side arm mounts for antennas or equipment must be the minimum extension necessary and for wooden poles the inside edge of the antenna or equipment may be no more than 12 inches off the pole and for non-wooden poles no more than six inches off the pole.
9.
The preferred location of a small wireless facility on a pole is the location with the least visible impact.
10.
Antennas, equipment enclosures, and ancillary equipment, conduit and cable shall not dominate the structure or pole upon which they are attached.
11.
Except for locations in the right-of-way or within access easements on private property with property owner permission, small wireless facilities are not permitted on any property containing a residential use in the residential zones.
12.
The town may consider the cumulative visual effects of small wireless facilities mounted on poles within the rights-of-way when assessing proposed siting locations so as to not adversely affect the visual character of the town. This provision shall not be applied to limit the number of permits issued when no alternative sites are reasonably available nor to impose a technological requirement on the applicant.
13.
These design standards are intended to be used solely for the purpose of concealment and siting. Nothing herein shall be interpreted or applied in a manner which dictates the use of a particular technology. When strict application of these requirements would unreasonably impair the function of the technology chosen by the applicant, alternative forms of concealment or deployment may be permitted which provide similar or greater protections from negative visual impacts to the streetscape.
(Ord. 694 § 2, 2019)
A.
New poles within the rights-of-way or in an access easement on private property with property owner permission are only permitted if the applicant can establish that:
1.
The proposed small wireless facility cannot be located on an existing utility pole or light pole, electrical transmission tower or on a site outside of the public rights-of-way or access easement such as a public park, public property, or building;
2.
The proposed small wireless facility receives approval for a concealment element design, as described in subsection (D)(1) of this section;
3.
For access easements, the property owner has given permission for the placement of a new pole within the access easement in such a manner so as to not frustrate the purpose of the easement or create any access or safety issue and shall be in compliance with all land use regulations such as, but not limited to, setback requirements;
4.
The proposed small wireless facility also complies with the Shoreline Management Act and SEPA, if applicable;
5.
Any new pole shall be installed at the point closest to the side property line so as to not impact the property's view; and
6.
No new poles shall be located in a critical area or associated buffer required by the town's critical areas regulations for shoreline jurisdiction.
B.
The planning commission shall be vested with the authority by this chapter to determine at a public hearing whether to grant, grant with conditions, or deny an application for the siting of new poles for the installation of small wireless facilities.
C.
The new pole shall generally conform with the designs included below. The exact pole design type (Option A and Option B) shall be determined by the town based on the town's need for light at the proposed location. Any new pole shall be installed at the sole expense of the applicant.
1.
Option A shall be a light standard designed in conjunction with the town representative to be compatible with the town's existing light pole infrastructure and conforming to the town's technical standards for such poles.
2.
Option B shall be a hollow pole designed for small wireless facilities only, generally conforming with the design shown in Figure 1 below.
 Figure 1 |
D.
The concealment element design shall include the design of the screening, fencing or other concealment technology for a tower, pole, or equipment structure, and all related transmission equipment or facilities associated with the proposed small wireless facility, including but not limited to fiber and power connections.
1.
The concealment element design should seek to minimize the visual obtrusiveness of the small wireless facility. The proposed pole or structure shall conform to the pole design type designated by the town for the proposed location. Any concealment element design for a small wireless facility on a new pole should attempt to mimic the design of such pole and integrate the small wireless facility into the design of the pole. Other concealment methods include, but are not limited to, integrating the installation with architectural features or building design components, utilization of coverings or concealment devices of similar material, color, and texture—or the appearance thereof—as the surface against which the installation will be seen or on which it will be installed, landscape design, or other camouflage strategies appropriate for the type of installation. Applicants are required to utilize designs in which all conduit and wirelines are installed internally in the structure. Further, applicant designs should, to the extent technically possible, comply with the generally applicable design standards adopted pursuant to YPMC § 17.30.150.
2.
If the town representative has already approved a concealment element design either for the applicant or another small wireless facility along the same public right-of-way or for the same pole type, then the applicant shall utilize a substantially similar concealment element design, unless it can show that such concealment element design is not physically or technologically feasible, or that such deployment would undermine the generally applicable design standards.
E.
Even if an alternative location is established pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the town representative may determine that a new pole in the right-of-way is in fact a superior alternative based on the impact to the town, the concealment element design, the town's comprehensive plan and the added benefits to the community.
F.
Prior to the issuance of a permit to construct a new pole or ground-mounted equipment in the right-of-way, the applicant must obtain a site-specific agreement from the town to locate such new pole or ground-mounted equipment. This requirement also applies to replacement poles that are higher than the replaced pole, and the overall height of the replacement pole and the proposed small wireless facility is more than 60 feet.
G.
These design standards are intended to be used solely for the purpose of concealment and siting. Nothing herein shall be interpreted or applied in a manner which dictates the use of a particular technology. When strict application of these requirements would unreasonably impair the function of the technology chosen by the applicant, alternative forms of concealment or deployment may be permitted which provide similar or greater protections of the streetscape.
H.
A decision on an application for the siting of new poles for the installation of small wireless facilities made by the planning commission are final decisions appealable to the hearing examiner within 30 days of such decision. The timely filing of an appeal on a decision for an application for the siting of new poles shall stay the effective date of the decision until such time as the appeal is concluded or withdrawn.
(Ord. 694 § 2, 2019)
A.
Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to eligible facilities requests only as described in this section:
1. "Base station"a. b. c. d.
means a structure or equipment at a fixed location that enables FCC-licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network. The term does not encompass a tower as defined herein nor any equipment associated with a tower. Base station includes, without limitation:
Equipment associated with wireless communication services as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul.
Radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration (including distributed antenna systems ("DAS") and small wireless networks).
Any structure other than a tower that, at the time the relevant application is filed (with jurisdiction) under this section, supports or houses equipment described in subsections (A)(1)(a) and (b) of this section that has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another state or local regulatory review process, even if the structure was not built for the sole or primary purpose of providing that support.
The term does not include any structure that, at the time the eligible facilities request application is filed with the town, does not support or house equipment described in subsections (A)(1)(a) and (b) of this section.
2. "Collocation"
means the mounting or installation of transmission equipment on an eligible support structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communication purposes.
3. "Eligible facilities request"
means any request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station, involving:
4. "Eligible support structure"
means any tower or base station as defined in this section; provided, that it is existing at the time the relevant application is filed with the town.
5. "Existing"
means a constructed tower or base station is existing if it has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another state or local regulatory review process; provided, that a tower that has not been reviewed and approved because it was not in a zoned area when it was built, but was lawfully constructed, is existing for purposes of this definition.
6. "Substantial change"a. b. c. d. e. f.
means a modification substantially changes the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure if it meets any of the following criteria:
For towers other than towers in the public rights-of-way, it increases the height of the tower by more than 10 percent or by the height of one additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet, whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it increases the height of the structure by more than 10 percent or more than 10 feet, whichever is greater;
For towers other than towers in the public rights-of-way, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than 20 feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than six feet;
For any eligible support structure, it involves installation of more than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four cabinets; or, for towers in the public rights-of-way and base stations, it involves installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there are no preexisting ground cabinets associated with the structure, or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than 10 percent larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the structure;
It entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site;
It would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support structure; or
It does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval of the construction or modification of the eligible support structure or base station equipment; provided, however, that this limitation does not apply to any modification that is noncompliant only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds identified above.
8. "Tower"
means any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting any FCC-licensed or authorized antennas and their associated facilities, including structures that are constructed for wireless communication services including, but not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul and the associated site.
9. "Transmission equipment"
means equipment that facilitates transmission for any FCC-licensed or authorized wireless communication service, including, but not limited to, radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, and regular and backup power supply. The term includes equipment associated with wireless communication services including, but not limited to, private, broadcast, and public safety services, as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul.
B.
Application. The town representative shall prepare and make publicly available an application form used to consider whether an application is an eligible facilities request. The application may not require the applicant to demonstrate a need or business case for the proposed modification.
C.
Qualification as an Eligible Facilities Request. Upon receipt of an application for a complete eligible facilities request, the town representative shall review such application to determine whether the application qualifies as an eligible facilities request.
D.
Time Frame for Review. Within 60 days of the date on which an applicant submits a complete eligible facilities request application, the town representative shall approve the application unless it determines that the application is not covered by this section.
E.
Tolling of the Time Frame for Review. The 60-day review period begins to run when the complete application is filed and may be tolled only by mutual agreement by the town representative and the applicant or in cases where the town representative determines that the application is incomplete. The time frame for review of an eligible facilities request is not tolled by a moratorium on the review of applications.
1.
To toll the time frame for incompleteness, the town representative shall provide written notice to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, clearly and specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application.
2.
The time frame for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental submission in response to the town representative's notice of incompleteness.
3.
Following a supplemental submission, the town representative will notify the applicant within 10 days that the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The time frame is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in this subsection. Second or subsequent notice of incompleteness may not specify missing documents or information that was not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness.
F.
Determination That Application Is Not an Eligible Facilities Request. If the town representative determines that the applicant's request does not qualify as an eligible facilities request, the town representative shall deny the application.
G.
Failure to Act. In the event the town representative fails to approve or deny a request for an eligible facilities request within the time frame for review (accounting for any tolling), the request shall be deemed granted. The deemed grant does not become effective until the applicant notifies the town representative in writing after the review period has expired (accounting for any tolling) that the application has been deemed granted.
(Ord. 694 § 2, 2019)
A.
Each permitted small wireless facility permit holder shall conduct annual tests, at the permit holder's expense, necessary to establish the level of radio frequency radiation created by the small wireless facility. The purpose of this testing is to ensure that the radio frequency radiation is in compliance with the FCC's regulations and standards.
B.
The permit holder shall test the small wireless facility every April to measure the radio frequency radiation created by the small wireless communication facilities to ensure compliance with the FCC's regulations and standards.
C.
All such tests required by this section shall be performed by a licensed electrical engineer, or by a person with equivalent capabilities approved by the town engineer.
D.
Copies of each and every radio frequency radiation test shall be submitted to the town engineer on the first day of the month following the month in which the test is performed. Such test results shall be certified by a licensed electrical engineer. No renewal of a permit or lease shall be granted unless the permit holder submits the test results to the town prior to the town's consideration of the renewal application.
E.
If at any time the radio frequency radiation test shows that the radio frequency radiation emanating from the small wireless facility exceeds the standards established by the FCC, the permit holder shall immediately disconnect the small wireless facility and notify the town engineer. The small wireless facility shall not be reconnected until the permit holder demonstrates that corrections have been completed to reduce the radio frequency radiation to levels permitted by the FCC.
(Ord. 694 § 2, 2019)
Small wireless facility permit decisions made by the town representative are final decisions appealable to the hearing examiner within 30 days of such decision. However, decisions on requests for new poles for the siting of small wireless facilities, as outlined in YPMC § 17.30.160, are determined by the planning commission at a public hearing. Such decisions on new poles are final and appealable to the town council within 30 days of such decision. The timely filing of an appeal of a wireless communication facility permit decision shall stay the effective date of the decision until such time as the appeal is concluded or withdrawn.
(Ord. 694 § 2, 2019)