[1]
Editor's Note: Former Article III, Nonconformance, adopted Ord. No. 28-1997, 3-4-1997, as amended by Ord. No. 42-1997, 4-15-1997; Ord. No. 67-1998, 4-21-1998; Ord. No. 14/15-2000, 8-15-2000; Ord. No. 12-2005, 8-3-2004, 4-6-2010, was amended in its entirety 3-7-2023(3).
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
(a) 
Any use of buildings, structures, premises, land or parts thereof legally existing at the effective date of the Ordinance from which this Chapter is derived and made nonconforming by the provisions of this Chapter or any amendments thereto, may be continued as legally nonconforming uses, subject to the provisions of this Article.
(b) 
Except as provided in this Article, a nonconforming use, a structure in which a nonconforming use occurs, a structure that is nonconforming with respect to dimensional requirements for a respective zoning district, a lot that does not comply with either or both of the minimum lot frontage and minimum lot size dimensional requirements for a respective zoning district, and a lot that exceeds the maximum allowed lot coverage dimensional requirements for a respective zoning district, shall not be expanded so as to increase the portion of a property or structure located thereon that is used for a nonconforming use or activity.
(c) 
The nonconforming status of a structure or property shall run with the property and not a specific owner or lessee of said property.
(d) 
An increase in the intensity or volume of business, where there is no increase in the amount of space dedicated to the use nor any change in the specific nature of the use, is not considered an enlargement or expansion of a legally established nonconforming use.
(e) 
A legally established nonconforming use may be continued and used for the same nonconforming purpose regardless of its noncompliance with the use regulations in this Chapter.
(f) 
Any structure, building, or site containing a legally established nonconforming use may be physically repaired, maintained, and/or renovated, as long as the total area within the structure, building, or site dedicated to the nonconforming use is not changed or expanded, and as long as there is no change in the specific nature of the nonconforming use. Any building or structure containing a legally established nonconforming use that is destroyed or damaged by fire, lightning, wind, flood, or other casualty may be rebuilt within two years of the date of loss and the nonconforming use may continue, provided there is no increase in the total area dedicated to the nonconforming use and no change in the specific nature of the use. The two year time period identified in this provision means that an applicant/owner shall have obtained a City building permit within two years of the loss, and commenced substantial construction. The completion of construction shall comply with terms of the issued building permit. A reconstructed building, however, shall comply with Chapter 74, Building and Building Regulation, requirements.
(g) 
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article III, Nonconformance, a property located in a Shoreland Zone must comply with Chapter 82, Shoreland Zoning, requirements, a property located in a Flood Zone must comply with Chapter 78, Floods, requirements, and a project that involves the renovation, expansion, or reconstruction of a structure must comply with Chapter 74, Building and Building Regulations. Chapter 82, Shoreland Zoning, and Chapter 78, Floods, identify specific standards and a process for consideration of nonconforming situations.
(h) 
Replacement structures that are permitted uses subject to Planning Board review in this Chapter shall not be considered new structures for zoning purposes.
(i) 
Effective March 4, 1997, any and all yard sale or yard sale operations shall conform to the respective standards identified in Article V, District Regulations, of this Chapter. No yard sale or yard sale operation that existed on or prior to March 4, 1997, or that was established after that date, shall qualify as a legally established nonconforming use of record which may be continued, unless said use conforms with the provisions of this Chapter relating to yard sales.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
Effective July 1, 2023, if any nonconforming use ceases for any reason for a period of two (2) years or more, any subsequent use shall conform to the provisions of this Chapter, unless specifically excepted in this Chapter.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
(a) 
A Type 2 Nonconformity involves a situation in which an existing residential use of a property is legally conforming or legally nonconforming; however, some portion of a legally existing residential structure or accessory structure to the residential use located on the property is legally nonconforming with regard to the minimum structure setback standards set forth for each District in Article V of this Chapter.
(b) 
No structure or use which is nonconforming with regard to the maximum structure height standards set forth for each District in Article V of this Chapter may be expanded or increased with regard to such existing nonconforming structure height. In addition, an existing structure that complies with the maximum structure height standard for a respective zoning district shall not increase the height of any structure in excess of the respective maximum structure height standard.
(c) 
(Reserved)[1]
[1]
Editor's Note: Section 102-215(c) was repealed by vote of the City Council on March 7, 2023. The effective date of said repeal is July 1, 2023.
(d) 
Any residential dwelling structure or accessory structure to a residential use on an existing conforming or nonconforming lot of record as of July 26, 1985, may be expanded or enlarged, provided the following conditions are met:
(1) 
The nonconforming expansion shall not bring any portion of an individual structure any closer to a lot line than the existing nonconforming structure. Notwithstanding this provision, no portion of any expansion of a nonconforming residential structure shall be located within three (3) feet of an existing lot line, unless Article V, District Regulations, allows a lesser structure setback for a respective zoning district.
(2) 
An expansion of the footprint of a structure constructed within what would normally be required for a minimum lot line setback shall be limited during the lifetime of the existing nonconforming structure to 30% of the portion of the footprint of the structure (as measured in square feet) that is located within the nonconforming setback area for the structure from any and all of the respective lot lines. The amount of nonconforming expansion allowed pursuant to this calculation can be applied to any nonconforming setback area of the structure; the nonconforming expansion is not limited to a specific nonconforming setback area.
(3) 
An expansion that involves the expansion of one or more upper stories of a structure shall be limited during the lifetime of the existing nonconforming structure to a maximum of 30% of the area (as measured in square feet) of the respective floor/story of the structure that is located within the nonconforming setback area of any and all of the respective lot lines. The amount of nonconforming expansion allowed pursuant to this calculation, can be applied to any nonconforming setback area for that floor/story of the structure; the nonconforming expansion is not limited to a specific nonconforming setback area.
(4) 
In calculating the amount of a nonconforming expansion that may be permitted pursuant to Subsection (d)(2) and (3) above, the amount of nonconforming expansion shall separately be calculated for the amount of an enclosed structure and the amount of an open structure, such as a deck, on the respective story/floor of a structure. The allowed amount of nonconforming expansion calculated for an enclosed structure can be applied to the expansion of either an enclosed structure or an open structure within the nonconforming area, provided such occurs on the same story/floor of the structure upon which the calculation was based; however, the allowed amount of nonconforming expansion calculated for an open structure shall only be applied to the expansion of an open structure within the nonconforming area, provided such occurs on the same story/floor to the structure upon which the calculation was based.
If a nonconforming expansion of an open structure within a nonconforming setback area is based upon the calculation of the amount of nonconforming area for an open structure, the expansion of the open structure shall not involve the creation of any usable area above that open structure.
(5) 
The construction or enlargement of a new or replacement footer, slab, frost wall or full foundation, even if said construction results in the creation of habitable (usable) space, shall be permitted in any area underneath an enclosed structure or an open structure that is granted a Type 2 Nonconforming Permit by the Planning Board, provided none of the construction in the nonconforming area extends beyond the exterior dimensions of the structure permitted in the Type 2 Nonconforming Permit. The above types of construction shall not factor into the amount of nonconforming expansion that is permitted pursuant to a Type 2 Nonconforming Permit; however, the proposed construction must be identified in the Type 2 Permit issued by the Board.
(6) 
In calculating the amount of nonconforming structure expansion, and the amount of structure setback from a lot line, the following standards shall apply:
a. 
Landings (stoops) that are 3 ft x 4 ft or less in dimension and steps shall not be considered in the calculation in the amount of nonconforming structure expansion that is permitted, nor shall the construction of any such new or replacement landings (3 ft x 4 ft or less) or steps apply to the amount of nonconforming structure expansion that is permitted.
b. 
Landings (stoops) that are 3 ft x 4 ft or less in dimension and steps shall not be used to establish the amount of structure setback from a lot line, and new or replacement landings (3 ft x 4 ft or less) and steps shall be permitted regardless of the amount of setback from a lot line.
c. 
The amount of structure setback from a lot line shall be determined based on a portion of a structure, such as a wall or roof line, that is at least four feet in length, and shall not be based upon a single point of a structure.
(7) 
The Council, in adopting amended standards for a Type 2 Nonconformity on March 7, 2023, with the effective date of said amendments being July 1, 2023, recognized that the Planning Board, pursuant to the Article III, Nonconformance provisions adopted on March 4, 1997, used a different methodology to calculate the amount of allowed nonconforming expansion, and that the amendments to the Type 2 standards adopted on March 7, 2023, with the effective date of said amendments being July 1, 2023, likely will have a varying amount of impact on the amount of expansion granted compared to past Type 2 Permits that have been issued. Thus, pursuant to a permit request from a property owner, until June 30, 2028, the City shall recognize the amount of remaining nonconforming residential expansion for a specific property identified in a Type 2 Permit validly issued by the Planning Board. Notwithstanding this provision, an applicant/owner can chose to submit a Type 2 Permit application in accordance with the amended formula the Council adopted on March 7, 2023, with the effective date of said amendment being July 1, 2023, rather than a previously issued Type 2 Permit. After June 30, 2028, all Type 2 Permits shall be based solely on the methodology identified in the amendments adopted on March 7, 2023, that took effect on July 1, 2023, regardless of any past permits issued for a Type 2 Nonconformity pursuant to terms of the 1997 Ordinance.
(8) 
A structure or structures on a property for which a Type 2 Permit was issued prior to July 1, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted on March 7, 2023), and that used all of the 30% lifetime expansion allowed pursuant to Section 102-215(d) in Article III, Nonconformance, that was adopted on March 4, 1997, shall not have the right to submit or request a Type 2 Permit pursuant to the methodology identified in the amended Section 102-215 provisions adopted on March 7, 2023, and that became effective on July 1, 2023. Said structures and properties used all of the amount of lifetime expansion permitted, and thus, no longer qualify to request an additional nonconforming expansion.
In addition, prior to December 31, 2022, a limited number of properties were granted a Type 2 Permit based on the "12 foot standard" identified in the former provisions of the 1997 Ordinance, reference former Section 102-215(d). A property that was granted a nonconforming expansion permit for a structure or structures pursuant to the former 12 foot standard are assumed to have used the equivalent of a 30% expansion, and cannot submit or request a Type 2 Permit pursuant to the methodology identified in the amended Section 102-215(d) provisions adopted on March 7, 2023, and that took effect on July 1, 2023, unless an applicant/owner can provide evidence that any and all past expansions that were granted and constructed pursuant to the former 12 foot standard would allow an additional expansion pursuant to the amended methodology for calculating a nonconforming expansion for a Type 2 Permit that took effect on July 1, 2023 (as adopted on March 7, 2023).
(9) 
The applicant shall be responsible for submitting a Type 2 Permit application that clearly identifies the size and location of the existing structure, that identifies the amount of the existing structure in the nonconforming area, that identifies the amount and location of the proposed expansion, that describes the purpose of the proposed expansion, and that describes how the applicant believes the project complies with requirements of this Article. An applicant, if requested by the Planning and Codes Department or Planning Board, shall be required to prepare a property survey that addresses the above requirements.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
(a) 
Type 4.1 Nonconformity is an existing nonresidential structure on a conforming lot of record or a legally established nonconforming lot of record, and the structure is legally nonconforming with regard to one or more minimum structure setback requirements for the respective zoning district in which it is located. Such structures may be expanded, subject to the following standards:
(1) 
The nonconforming expansion shall not bring any portion of an individual structure any closer to a lot line than the existing nonconforming structure. Notwithstanding this provision, no portion of any expansion of a nonconforming structure shall be located within five feet of an existing lot line, unless the minimum structure setback standards identified in Article V, District Regulations, for a respective zoning district allow a structure setback of five (5) feet or less.
(2) 
A nonconforming expansion of the footprint of a structure constructed within what would normally be required for a minimum lot line setback shall be limited during the lifetime of the existing nonconforming structure to 30% of the area (as measured in square feet) for the portion of the footprint of the structure that is located within the nonconforming setback area from any and all of the respective lot lines. The amount of nonconforming expansion allowed pursuant to this calculation can be applied to any nonconforming setback area of the structure; the nonconforming expansion is not limited to a specific nonconforming setback area.
(3) 
A nonconforming expansion that involves the expansion of one or more existing upper stories of a nonresidential structure shall be limited during the lifetime of the existing structure to a maximum of 30% of the area (as measured in square feet) of the respective floor/story of the structure. The amount of nonconforming expansion allowed pursuant to this calculation, can be applied to any nonconforming setback area for that floor/story of the structure; the nonconforming expansion is not limited to a specific nonconforming setback area.
(4) 
In calculating the amount of a nonconforming expansion that may be permitted pursuant to Subsection (a)(2) and (3) above, the amount of nonconforming expansion shall separately be calculated for the amount of an enclosed structure and the amount of an open structure, such as a deck, a walkway or a display area that may or may not have a roof. The allowed amount of nonconforming expansion calculated for an enclosed structure can be applied to the expansion of either an enclosed structure or an open structure within the nonconforming area, provided such occurs on the same story/floor of the structure upon which the calculation was based; however, the allowed amount of nonconforming expansion calculated for an open structure shall only be applied to the expansion of an open structure within the nonconforming area, provided such occurs on the same story/floor to the structure upon which the calculation was based.
If a nonconforming expansion of an open structure within a nonconforming setback area is based upon the calculation of the amount of nonconforming area for an open structure, the expansion of the open structure shall not involve the creation of any usable area above that open structure.
(5) 
The construction or enlargement of a new or replacement footer, slab, frost wall or full foundation, even if said construction results in the creation of habitable (usable) space, shall be permitted in any area underneath an enclosed structure or an open structure that is granted a Type 4.1 Nonconforming Permit by the Planning Board, provided none of the construction in the nonconforming area extends beyond the exterior dimensions of the structure permitted in the Type 4.1 Nonconforming Permit. The above types of construction shall not factor into the amount of nonconforming expansion that is permitted pursuant to a Type 4.1 Nonconforming Permit; however, the proposed construction must be identified in the Type 4.1 Permit issued by the Board.
(6) 
In calculating the amount of nonconforming structure expansion, and the amount of structure setback from a lot line, the following standards shall apply:
a. 
Landings (stoops) that are 3 ft x 4 ft or less in dimension and steps shall not be considered in the calculation in the amount of nonconforming structure expansion that is permitted, nor shall the construction of any such new or replacement landings (3 ft x 4 ft or less) or steps apply to the amount of nonconforming structure expansion that is permitted.
b. 
Landings (stoops) that are 3 ft x 4 ft or less in dimension and steps shall not be used to establish the amount of structure setback from a lot line, and new or replacement landings (3 ft x 4 ft or less) and steps shall be permitted regardless of the amount of setback from a lot line.
c. 
The amount of structure setback from a lot line shall be determined based on a portion of a structure, such as a wall or roof line, that is at least four feet in length, and shall not be based upon a single point of a structure.
(7) 
An applicant/owner that proposes a Type 4.1 expansion that may result in an increase in on-site parking requirements pursuant to the Chapter 98, Technical Standards, Section 98-242, shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Board that the amount of on-site parking that is provided is adequate for the use, including the amount of the proposed expansion.
(b) 
A Type 4.2 nonresidential expansion involves an application to expand a legally established nonconforming nonresidential use that would increase the amount of area (as measured in square feet) located within one or more structures that is devoted to one or more nonresidential uses by up to 30% of the area (floor space) located in a respective structure that is devoted to a nonconforming activity. A Type 4.2 expansion does not involve a physical expansion of the structure, and only involves increasing the amount of a nonconforming use within an existing structure. The Planning Board shall approve a Type 4.2 application if all of the following conditions are met:
(1) 
The expansion will not result in more detrimental or objectionable impacts with respect to unsafe or unhealthful conditions, either in the structure or in an area lying within a three-hundred-foot radius of the proposed expansion;
(2) 
The parking needs generated by such expansion shall, as deemed appropriate by the Planning Board, satisfy parking requirements identified in Article VIII, Parking and Loading Facilities, in the Chapter 98, Technical Standards. It is the intent of this provision to assess only the parking needs of the expansion, and not the adequacy of parking or availability of parking of the existing legally established nonconforming use;
(3) 
The character of the appearance of the exterior of the structure containing the use is improved or is not substantially changed; and
(4) 
The expansion shall take place within an existing structure and shall not involve changing the footprint or height of the structure in which the use occurs.
(c) 
An applicant for a Type 4.1 or 4.2 Permit shall be responsible for submitting a Permit application that clearly identifies the following: the size and location of the existing structure, the amount of the existing structure in the nonconforming area, the amount and location of the proposed expansion within the structure, and that describes the purpose of the proposed expansion, and how the applicant believes the project complies with requirements of this Article. An applicant, if requested by the Planning and Codes Department or Planning Board, shall be required to prepare a property survey that addresses the above requirements.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
A Type 5 Nonconformity is an expansion of a legally established nonconforming use located in the following zoning districts: Outside Rural-1, Outside Rural-2, Residential-4, Residential-5, Residential-6, Route 3 Rural, Lower Congress Mixed Use, Swan Lake Avenue Mixed Use, and Airport Growth. Any such expansion shall be subject to review and approval pursuant to the Permit process identified in Section 102-103, and if applicable, Chapter 90, Site Plans. The proposed expansion shall not include land acquired after the enactment of the Ordinance from which this Chapter was initially derived, March 14, 1995, and provided that all applicable standards are met.
[1]
Editor's Note: Section 102-219, Public hearing on application for change, expansion or replacement of use, was repealed by vote of the City Council on March 7, 2023. The effective date of said repeal is July 1, 2023.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
Fees for permits under this Article shall be established by the City Council. Fees shall be nonrefundable and shall be paid upon application for the permit.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
A lot created subsequent to the enactment of the respective Ordinance from which this Chapter is derived that does not meet both or either of the minimum lot frontage and minimum lot size dimensional requirements of this Chapter for a respective zoning district is declared to be illegal. Additionally, any lot previously created which was illegal when created due to the failure of such lot to meet both or either of the minimum lot frontage and minimum lot size dimensional requirements of the then-existing Ordinance that was in effect continues to remain an illegal lot. No permit shall be approved for an illegal lot.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
A Type 6 Nonconformity involves a request for a Permit to replace a legally established nonconforming structure. The Planning Board may grant permission for the replacement of a legally established nonconforming residential, nonresidential, or accessory structure, provided all of the following criteria are met:
(1) 
A nonconforming structure may be replaced within two years of the structure being destroyed, removed or deemed unsafe by the Code Enforcement Officer. This standard means that an applicant/owner, within two years, has requested and obtained a Type 6 Permit from the Planning Board, has obtained a Building Permit, and has initiated substantial construction. The terms of the Building Permit shall govern the date by which construction of the replacement structure must be completed.
(2) 
The replacement structure shall be located wholly on the applicant's property, and none of the structure shall be located on property owned by an abutter or within the limits of the road right-of-way.
(3) 
The replacement structure shall not constitute an expansion of a nonconforming use.
(4) 
The replacement structure shall not involve an increase in any nonconforming height of the structure being replaced.
(5) 
In proposing the location for a replacement structure within a nonconforming area, the applicant shall locate the replacement structure in the same or a similar location to the structure that is being replaced, unless the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Board that there is good cause to alter the location of the replacement structure. Good cause may include but is not specifically limited to factors such as the following:
a.
Topographic conditions (for example, grade of the property, stormwater management, and soil conditions);
b.
Preserving existing characteristics of the site (for example, existing trees and significant vegetation, and decreasing the need for significant soil removal);
c.
Reducing or not increasing the amount of negative impact on neighboring properties;
d.
Creating opportunities for the property/structure to come into greater compliance with City or state requirements (for example, Shoreland, Floodplain, or performance standards that apply to a specific use or zoning district); and
e.
Creating opportunities for overall site improvements, particularly improvements that may benefit the public health, safety, and welfare (for example, driveway access, traffic, and parking).
An applicant for a Type 6 Permit shall be responsible for submitting a permit application that clearly identifies the following:
a.
The size and location of the former structure that is proposed to be replaced and other existing structures on the property;
b.
The amount of the former structure in the nonconforming area,
c.
The need to construct a replacement structure;
d.
The amount and location of the proposed replacement structure within the nonconforming area, and if the construction of the replacement structure involves any increase in size or height of the replacement structure;
e.
If applicable, that describes why the applicant is proposing to relocate the replacement structure;
f.
That identifies information regarding the location of structures on abutting properties that are located near the applicant's property lines, and
g.
That describes how the applicant believes the project complies with requirements of this Article.
An applicant, if requested by the Planning and Codes Department or the Planning Board, shall be required to prepare a property survey that addresses the above requirements.
[Amended 3-7-2023(3)]
Any structure, lot, or use of land that conforms to the provisions of this Article as of the effective date of adoption or amendment of the provision or requirement concerned, but is subsequently made nonconforming as to that provision or requirement as a result of a governmental action (including any municipal or state road project, property purchase, or eminent domain acquisition), shall be treated as a legally existing nonconformity as to that provision or requirement in accordance with this Chapter.
[Added 3-7-2023(3)]
A Type 7 Nonconformity involves a request from a property owner to exceed the maximum amount of lot coverage that is permitted on a property in a respective zoning district; reference the Dimensional Standards Table for the respective type of use and zoning district. The following standards shall govern when the Planning Board may allow an increase in lot coverage that exceeds an identified standard.
(1) 
Type 7-1 Nonconformity. A property that is used for a nonresidential use or a mixed use development that includes a nonresidential use, that was constructed and issued an initial occupancy permit prior to July 1, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023), and that exceeds or is within 5% of the maximum lot coverage standard identified in the dimensional table for a respective zoning district, may increase the amount of lot coverage that existed on the property on June 30, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023 is July 1, 2023) by a maximum of 10% of that amount of coverage over the life of a nonresidential use on the property. The property owner (applicant) shall be responsible for providing evidence to the Planning Board that identifies the amount of lot coverage that existed on June 30, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023 is July 1, 2023), and how the applicant request complies with the requirements of this standard.
(2) 
Type 7-2 Nonconformity. A property that is used for a single family, single family with detached accessory dwelling unit, or a duplex, and that was constructed and issued an initial occupancy permit prior to July 1, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023), and that exceeds or was within 5% of the maximum lot coverage standard identified in the Dimensional Table for a respective zoning district, may increase the amount of lot coverage that existed as of June 30, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023 is July 1, 2023) by a maximum of 10% of that amount of lot coverage over the life of the respective residential use on the property. The property owner (applicant) shall be responsible for providing evidence to the Planning Board that identifies the amount of lot coverage that existed on June 30, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023 is July 1, 2023), and how the applicant request complies with the requirements of this standard.
(3) 
Type 7-3 Nonconformity. A property that is used for multi-family housing, and that was constructed and issued an initial occupancy permit prior to July 1, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023), and that exceeds or was within 5% of the maximum lot coverage standard identified in the Dimensional Table for a respective zoning district, may increase the amount of lot coverage that existed as of June 30, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023 is July 1, 2023) by a maximum of 10% of that amount of coverage over the life of the multi-family use on the property. The property owner (applicant) shall be responsible for providing evidence to the Planning Board that identifies the amount of lot coverage that existed on June 30, 2023 (effective date of amendments adopted by the Council on March 7, 2023 is July 1, 2023), and how the applicant request complies with the requirements of this standard.
(4) 
If the property that is the subject of a Type 7-1, 7-2, or 7-3 Nonconformity request is located in a Shoreland District, the request must comply with applicable Shoreland requirements regarding lot coverage. A request to increase the amount of nonconforming lot coverage in a Shoreland District shall be subject to review pursuant to provisions in Chapter 82, Shoreland Zoning, and not the provisions in this Chapter.
[Added 3-7-2023(3)]
Subject to approval by the Planning Board, a legally established nonconforming use may be changed to another nonconforming use that is deemed less or no more objectionable and detrimental than the existing legally established nonconforming use. A change of use is one that results in an activity that is different in nature and purpose compared to the original (current) nonconforming activity; that results in a difference in quality, character, degree, and kind of activity; and is different in kind regarding its effect on the neighborhood. Less or no more objectionable means that the Planning Board finds that new proposed nonconforming use will have a lesser effect or no greater effect on the neighborhood and on the property on which the use occurs; is less or no more noticeable than the current use; is closer in nature to the uses allowed in the respective zoning district; will result in a decline in the volume or intensity of the use; or that is equally or more appropriate for the zoning district.
The Planning Board will review an application for a change in nonconforming use in accordance with the following standards:
(1) 
The hours of operation are reasonably the same as the prior use or will not create any significant adverse impacts.
(2) 
Undesirable effects such as noise, glare, vibration, smoke, dust, odor, or fire hazard are decreased or not increased.
(3) 
Hazardous traffic conditions are minimized or not increased and the amount of traffic is decreased or not so substantially increased so as to create a detrimental impact on the neighboring area.
(4) 
The need for on-site or off-site parking remains similar to the former use.
(5) 
The appearance of the property from public ways and abutting properties is improved or unchanged, and the value of adjacent properties will not be unduly adversely affected by the new use.
(6) 
Unsanitary conditions as a result of sewage disposal, air emissions, or other aspects of the new use will not be created or will be improved upon compared to the former use.
(7) 
The applicant has taken reasonable measures to address current performance standards in Subpart B of the Code of Ordinances.
An applicant requesting a change of use must submit an application that identifies the location and condition of the existing property, including a site plan, and a narrative description of how the applicant believes the project satisfies the above standards that the Planning Board must consider.
[Added 3-7-2023(3)]
The Belfast Planning Board shall be responsible for the review of an application for a Nonconforming Permit and shall use the following process to conduct its review and render a decision on a Permit. The Board has the authority to establish conditions on Permits it may issue.
(1) 
The Planning Board shall conduct a public hearing on all requests for a Nonconforming Permit.
(2) 
The Planning and Codes Department, on behalf of the Board, shall provide notice of the public hearing in the following manner:
a. 
In writing by first class mail a minimum of 13 calendar days prior to the public hearing to all owners of property that directly abut or that are located within 150 feet of any property line of the property for which a Permit is submitted. The Department shall keep a record of all persons to whom notice is sent.
b. 
By posting notice of the public hearing on the City of Belfast website and in Belfast City Hall (outside the Planning and Codes Office) a minimum of 13 calendar days prior to the public hearing.
(3) 
The Board shall conduct its review of the application post the public hearing, shall determine if the application complies with applicable standards, shall render a decision on the permit and establish any conditions that it deems the applicant must satisfy, and shall issue written findings of fact to describe its decision.
[Added 3-7-2023(3)]
The following words, terms, and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section. The definitions in this Section apply specifically to the interpretation of standards identified in Article III, Nonconformance, and do not apply to other Articles in this Chapter.
ENCLOSED STRUCTURE
An enclosed structure is a structure that has a roof, a floor, and three or more walls that together create an enclosed area.
HABITABLE (USABLE) AREA
The habitable (usable) area of an enclosed structure is any area that is five feet or greater in height as measured from the floor to the floor next above it, or if there is no floor above it, then the space between the floor and the ceiling next above it.
OPEN STRUCTURE
An open structure is a raised or in-ground platform, either freestanding or attached to a building, that has no walls, but that may have a roof. An open structure has area, but it has no volume.