(a)
In interpreting and applying the provisions of this title, the provisions shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of health, safety and general welfare of the public. Therefore, where the provisions of this title impose a greater restriction upon the use of buildings and premises or upon the height of buildings or structures, or require larger open spaces than are imposed or required by other laws, ordinances, easements, regulations, codes or covenants, the provisions of this title shall control.
In case of a conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, the most restrictive shall apply.
(b)
The planning commission shall review and determine any questions involving the proper interpretation or application of the provisions, use, or district boundaries of this title that may be requested by any property owner, tenant, government officer, department, hearing examiner or commission affected.
(c)
Recognizing that there may be uses not specifically mentioned in this title, either because of advancing technology or any other reason, the administrator may permit such use to be established if it is clearly evident that the use is similar and in conformity with the designated permitted uses of the use district in which it is to be located. When there is doubt as to the proper classification of a use, the planning commission shall rule on the matter. The hearing examiner’s decision shall be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this title and of the comprehensive plan.
The secretary of the planning commission shall keep a record of all interpretations and rulings made by the planning commission, and such decisions shall be binding.
The hearing examiner shall report his/her findings to the planning commission when it appears desirable and necessary to amend this title.
(Ord. 1896 § 4, 2020)