Any police officer who has been suspended, removed or reduced
in rank, may appeal the decision of the Borough Council by requesting
a hearing with the Civil Service Commission. In the event an officer
aggrieved by such a decision is entitled by a collective bargaining
agreement to pursue a grievance on the matter, the officer must elect
to pursue the matter either under the processes in place under the
collective bargaining agreement or under these rules and regulations.
Once an election of remedies is made, the alternate procedure is waived.
When chosen, the civil service hearing process is as follows:
A. The hearing request must be received in writing by the Secretary
of the Commission at 767 Fifth Street, Oakmont, PA 15139, requesting
a hearing, within 10 days after the police officer received notice
of the discipline requesting a hearing. The officer may make written
answers to any charges filed not later than the date fixed for the
hearing. Failure of the officer to provide written answers to any
of the charges shall not be deemed an admission by the officer. The
Commission shall schedule a hearing within 10 days from the officer's
written request for a hearing unless continued by the Commission for
cause at the request of the Borough Council or the officer. Notwithstanding
this provision, the failure of the Commission to hold a hearing within
10 days from the filing of the charges in writing shall not result
in the dismissal of the charges filed.
B. At any hearing, the officer against whom the charges have been made
may be present and represented by counsel, may call witnesses and
present testimony and documentation in defense. The Borough may also
be represented by counsel, call witnesses and present evidence as
is necessary to support the charges. A stenographic record of all
testimony shall be taken at every hearing and preserved by the Commission.
In the event the charges are dismissed, the record shall be sealed
and not be available for public inspection.
C. In conducting the hearing, the Commission's standard of review shall
be to determine whether sufficient evidence has been presented to
support the statutory reason for the disciplinary action. If the Commission
finds that sufficient evidence has been introduced to support the
charge, the Commission shall not modify the penalty imposed by the
Borough Council unless it finds that the penalty imposed was arbitrary,
discriminatory or an abuse of the board's discretion. In considering
the appropriateness of the discipline, the Commission shall not substitute
its judgment for that of the Borough Council. The Commission may request
post hearing briefs, and shall issue a written decision containing
specific findings of fact and conclusions of law within 60 days of
receipt of the hearing transcript.
D. In the event that the Commission fails to uphold the charges, then
the officer shall be reinstated with full pay for the period of the
suspension, removal or reduction in rank. No charges related to the
suspension, removal or reduction in rank shall be officially recorded
in the officer's official personnel records, nor may any of these
charges be held against the officer for future merit pay raises or
promotional opportunities.
If for reasons of economy or other reasons it shall be deemed
necessary by the Borough to reduce the number of paid officers, the
following procedure shall be followed:
A. The Borough shall first furlough the person or persons, including
probationers, last appointed to the respective force. Such removal
shall be accomplished by furloughing in numerical order commencing
with the person last appointed until such reduction shall have been
accomplished.
B. In the event that the Borough Council decides to increase the size
of the Police Department officer personnel, the furloughed police
officers shall be reinstated in order of their seniority in the Police
Department. Employees so notified of reinstatement must accept reinstatement
within 30 days of receipt of such notice, otherwise such employee
shall be deemed to have waived any right to reinstatement.
C. These reductions in force provisions are not applicable to the Chief
of Police.