All goods and services will be secured by use of written requests for proposals, written quotations, verbal quotations, or any other method that assures that goods will be purchased at the lowest price and that favoritism will be avoided, except in the following circumstances: purchase contracts over $10,000 and public works contracts over $20,000; goods purchased from agencies for the blind or severely handicapped pursuant to § 175-b of the State Finance Law; goods purchased from correctional institutions pursuant to § 186 of the Correction Law; purchases under state contracts pursuant to § 104 of the General Municipal Law; purchases under county contracts pursuant to § 103, Subdivision 3, of the General Municipal Law; or purchases pursuant to §
29-6 of this policy.
Documentation is required of each action taken in connections with each
procurement.
Documentation and an explanation is required whenever a contract is
awarded to other than the lowest responsible offeror. This documentation will
include an explanation of how the award will achieve savings or how the offeror
was not responsible. A determination that the offeror is not responsible shall
be made by the purchaser and may not be challenged under any circumstances.
Pursuant to General Municipal Law § 104-b, Subdivision 2f,
the procurement policy may contain circumstances when, or types of procurements
for which, in the sole discretion of the governing body, the solicitation
of alternative proposals or quotations will not be in the best interest of
the municipality. In the following circumstances it may not be in the best
interest of the Village of Poquott to solicit quotations or document the basis
for not accepting the lowest bid:
A. Professional services or services requiring special or
technical skill, training or expertise.
(1) The individual or company must be chosen based on accountability,
reliability, responsibility, skill, education and training, judgement, integrity,
and moral worth. These qualifications are not necessarily found in the individual
or company that offers the lowest price, and the nature of these services
are such that they do not readily lend themselves to competitive procurement
procedures.
(2) In determining whether a service fits into this category the
Board of Trustees shall take into consideration the following guidelines:
whether the services are subject to state licensing or testing requirements;
whether substantial formal education or training is a necessary prerequisite
to the performance of the services; and whether the services require a personal
relationship between the individual and municipal officials. Professional
or technical services shall include but not be limited to the following: services
of an engineer or architect engaged to prepare plans, maps and estimates;
securing insurance coverage and/or services of an insurance broker; services
of a certified public accountant; investment management services; printing
services involving extensive writing, editing or artwork; management of municipally
owned property; and computer software or programming services for customized
programs, or services involved in substantial modification and customizing
of prepackaged software.
B. Emergency purchases pursuant to § 103, Subdivision
4, of the General Municipal Law. Due to the nature of this exception, these
goods or services must be purchased immediately, and a delay in order to seek
alternate proposals may threaten the life, health, safety or welfare of the
residents. This section does not preclude alternate proposals if time permits.
C. Purchases of surplus and secondhand goods from any source.
If alternate proposals are required, the Village is precluded from purchasing
surplus and secondhand goods at auctions or through specific advertised sources
where the best prices are usually obtained. It is also difficult to try to
compare prices of used goods, and a lower price may indicate an older product.
D. Goods or services under $500. The time and documentation
required to purchase through this policy may be more costly than the item
itself and would therefore not be in the best interests of the taxpayer. In
addition, it is not likely that such de minimis contracts would be awarded
based on favoritism.
This policy shall go into effect July 3, 2000, and will be reviewed
annually.