The Board of Appeals shall, upon appeal, hear
and decide:
A. Any matter where the applicant alleges that the Building
Inspector was in error in refusing to issue a building permit or certificate
of occupancy, as a result of misinterpreting the meaning, intent or
application of any section or part of this chapter.
B. Any matter where the appellant alleges that the Building
Inspector was in error in his determination as to the exact location
of a district boundary line on the Zoning Map that forms a part of
this chapter.
C. Any matter which the Building Inspector refers on
grounds of doubt as to the meaning or intent of any provision of this
chapter or as to the location of a district boundary line on the Zoning
Map.
In the instances of the following types of variances, the Board of Appeals is hereby specifically empowered to grant the variance pursuant to the guiding principles stated in §
160-44 and to the provisions which follow:
A. With respect to lots lying across district boundary
lines:
(1) To grant a permit, in appropriate cases where the
lot of the appellant as such lot existed on the effective date of
this chapter lies across the boundary of two districts, for the extension
into the more restrictive district, but for a distance not exceeding
30 feet measured at right angles to such district boundary line.
B. With respect to nonconforming uses, buildings, structures
and lots:
(1) To grant a permit for the extension of such a nonconforming
use on the same lot on which it was located or an increase in the
degree of nonconformity of a nonconforming building or structure on
the lot occupied by such building or structure, provided that:
(a)
In the case of a nonconforming use, such enlargement
or extension shall not exceed, in all, 50% of the floor area of such
building or structure actually devoted to such nonconforming use on
the effective date of this use having first become nonconforming.
In the case of a nonconforming building or structure, such enlargement
or extension shall not exceed, in all, 50% of the usable floor area
of such building or structure existing on the effective date of the
building or structure having become nonconforming.
(b)
All parking and truck loading requirements of §
160-36 are complied with.
(c)
There shall be no change in the nature or character
of such nonconforming use or of such building or structure.
(d)
The lot coverage and density shall not be greater
than would be permitted by the most restrictive lot coverage and density
provisions of this chapter applicable to a permitted use of the same
nature or character. The term "density" includes, among other things,
the number of dwelling units allowed based on the lot area, and the
number of uses allowed based on the lot area.
(2) To grant a permit for the reconstruction, structural
alteration, restoration or repair of a building or structure used
for a nonconforming use, to an extent not to exceed an aggregate 100%
of the gross floor area of such building or structure.
(3) To grant a certificate of occupancy for a change in
a nonconforming use, provided that:
(a)
The Board of Appeals shall have made a determination
that such change will be beneficial to the general neighborhood.
(b)
Such change is made subject to such reasonable
conditions and safeguards as the Board of Appeals may stipulate.
C. With respect to yard requirements:
(1) To grant a variance modifying the yard requirements of a nonconforming lot which qualified under the terms of §
160-39C(4) as to ownership, but where compliance with the dimensional provisions of this chapter is not feasible.
D. With respect to fences:
(1) To grant a variance, in appropriate cases, for a higher fence or wall than the maximum heights stipulated in §
160-37.
E. With respect to accessory parking and truck loading
spaces:
(1) To waive, in whole or in part, the requirements of §
160-36C and
D for off-street parking and/or truck loading spaces after making a finding that a normal application of such requirements is infeasible because:
(a)
The lot has either too restricted an area or
unusual dimensions, shape or topographic character; and
(b)
No other suitable and adequate lot can be reasonably
put to such use within 500 feet of the property to which said parking
and/or truck loading spaces are accessory.
(2) To permit a reduction in the number of off-street parking spaces and/or truck loading spaces originally required and installed for a particular use pursuant to §
160-36C and
D, in cases where the Board of Appeals determines that, by reason of diminution in number of dwelling units or residents or in floor area, seating capacity or area or number of employees or change in other factors determining the demand for such spaces, the proposed reduction in available spaces will be consistent with the requirements of said sections, and further provided that the area so withdrawn from these uses shall remain in reserve for potential future increases in need.
F. With respect to historic and cultural landmarks after
recommendation by the Historic District Commission:
(1) To grant a variance for such use or uses compatible
with an intent to preserve, protect, restore or promote the historic
and cultural integrity of a landmark which is being adversely affected
by a new development, alteration or replacement and such relief from
parking and other requirements of this chapter as are appropriate,
provided that the Board of Appeals determines that:
(a)
A threat to the continuance of the landmark
as a historic or cultural Village resource exists.
(b)
Such variance is in the best interest of the Village and not contrary to this chapter's declaration of purpose in §
160-2.
(c)
Such variance is needed to support the continued
integrity of the landmark.
(d)
Such variance is reasonable as it may relate
to existing zoning district provisions and nearby neighborhood uses.
(2) The application shall be referred to the Planning
Board for its site plan review recommendations prior to the public
hearing on such application.
(3) Such variance may be made subject to such conditions
and safeguards as the Board of Appeals shall deem necessary or advisable,
including requiring a written agreement by the applicant to remove
such use or uses or to convert the same to a conforming use upon the
termination of the use of the actual historic landmark itself, its
removal from the property or its destruction by natural or other means.