The purpose of this article is to provide sound land use policies,
procedures and regulations for the location and placement of wireless
telecommunications structures, antennas and equipment within the Borough
of Milford in order to protect the community from the visual and other
adverse impacts of wireless telecommunications facilities and to preserve
the scenic and historic character of the countryside that the Milford
Borough Master Plan seeks to protect. This article seeks to meet the
mandate of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and at the same time,
without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to:
A. Protect residential areas and land uses from the potential adverse
impacts of towers and antennas;
B. Encourage the location of towers in nonresidential areas and along
major transportation corridors;
C. Minimize the total number of towers throughout the community;
D. Strongly encourage the joint use of new and existing tower sites
as a primary option rather than construction of additional single-use
towers;
E. Encourage users of towers and antennas to locate them, to the extent
possible, in areas where the adverse impact on the community is minimal;
F. Encourage users of towers and antennas to configure them in a way
that minimizes the adverse visual impact of the towers and antennas
through careful design, siting, landscape, screening and innovative
camouflaging techniques;
G. Enhance the ability of the providers of telecommunications services
to provide such services to the community quickly, effectively and
efficiently;
H. Consider the public health and safety of communications towers; and
I. Avoid potential damage to adjacent properties from tower failure
through proper engineering and careful siting of tower structures.
An applicant desiring to construct wireless telecommunications
antennas in allowable zones or towers in any zone shall demonstrate
to the satisfaction of the Joint Land Use Board, through the presentation
and introduction of documentary and parol evidence, each of the following:
A. The need for wireless telecommunications antennas at the proposed
location. The evidence presented and introduced to the Joint Land
Use Board shall describe in detail the wireless telecommunications
network layout and its coverage area requirements and the need for
new wireless telecommunications facilities at a specific location
within the Borough. The applicant shall also provide evidence to the
satisfaction of the Joint Land Use Board of all alternate wireless
network plan designs which would not require the applicant to construct
a wireless telecommunications tower at the proposed location.
B. That the applicant has exercised its best efforts to locate the wireless
telecommunications antennas on existing buildings or structures within
the applicant's search area. Without otherwise limiting the nature
of the evidence to be provided by the applicant in order to meet its
burden on this issue, the applicant shall provide to the Joint Land
Use Board copies of all correspondence from and between the wireless
telecommunications provider and the property owners of the existing
buildings or structures. The failure of the applicant to present evidence
of the foregoing shall constitute a rebuttable presumption that that
applicant has not exercised its best efforts as required herein. Evidence
demonstrating that no existing wireless telecommunications tower or
building or structure can accommodate the provider's proposed antenna
may consist of any one or more of the following:
(1)
No existing towers or structures are located within the geographic
area that is necessary to meet the provider's radio frequency engineering
requirement to provide reliable coverage.
(2)
Existing towers or structures are not of sufficient height and
cannot be made to be of sufficient height to meet the provider's radio
frequency engineering requirements or do not have sufficient structural
strength to support the provider's proposed antenna and related equipment.
(3)
The provider's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic
interference with the anterior on the existing towers or structures
or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference
with the provider's proposed antenna.
(4)
The fees, costs or contractual provisions required by the owner
in order to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing
tower or structure for sharing are patently unreasonable. Actual,
direct costs exceeding new tower design, development and construction
are presumed to be patently unreasonable.
(5)
The provider demonstrates that there are other limiting factors
that render existing towers and structures unsuitable.
C. The locations of all existing communications towers and other structures of not more than 140 feet in height within the applicant's search area and provide competent testimony by a radio frequency engineer regarding the suitability of each location so identified by the applicant in light of the design of the wireless telecommunications network and the alternate network designs identified pursuant to Subsection
A above.
D. Where a suitable location on an existing tower or other structure
is found to exist, but the applicant is unable to secure an agreement
to co-locate its equipment on such tower or other structure, the applicant
shall provide sufficient and credible written evidence of its attempt
or attempts to co-locate.
E. A full and complete description of all alternative technologies not
requiring the use of towers or other structures to provide the services
to be provided by the applicant through the use of the proposed tower.
F. That the applicant has exercised its best efforts to site new wireless
antennas, equipment or towers within the applicant's search area according
to the priority schedule below. Without otherwise limiting the nature
of the evidence to be provided by the applicant in order to meets
its burden on this issue, the applicant shall provide to the Joint
Land Use Board the block and lot number of any parcel for which the
wireless provider has attempted to secure a lease or purchase agreement
and copies of all correspondence from and between the wireless provider
and the property owner. The failure of the applicant to present evidence
of the foregoing shall constitute a rebuttable presumption that the
applicant has not exercised its best efforts as required herein.
|
Priority Zone
|
Equipment
|
Location
|
Permitted, Conditional or Prohibited
|
---|
|
GU
|
Antenna
|
Co-located with other antennas on existing structure or tower
within GU Zone
|
Conditional
|
|
GU
|
Antenna
|
Existing structure or tower within the GU Zone
|
Conditional
|
|
Any residential
|
Antenna
|
Entire zone
|
Prohibited
|
|
GU
|
Tower
|
Construct a tower within the GU Zone
|
Conditional
|
|
Any residential
|
Tower
|
Entire zone
|
Prohibited
|
G. Compliance with the Borough standard that no wireless telecommunications
towers shall be permitted which would require lighting affixed thereto
under FCC, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) or any other governmental
agency regulations or requirements.
An applicant desiring to construct a wireless telecommunications tower who has satisfied the requirements of §
190-132 above shall also satisfy the following bulk standards, which bulk standards shall be interpreted and reviewed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(c):
A. Minimum lot size: as required by the zone district in which located
or two acres, whichever is larger.
B. Minimum setback of wireless telecommunications tower from:
(1)
Any property line: the zone district setback requirement or
the tower height, whichever is greater.
(2)
Any existing residence: 500 feet.
(3)
Any wireless telecommunications tower: 5,280 feet.
C. Minimum setback for equipment compound from any property line: the
zone district setback requirements for an accessory building.
D. Maximum height of wireless telecommunications tower (exclusive of
lightning rod) designed to accommodate:
(1)
Three or more vendors: 140 feet.
E. Maximum height of attached antenna: 10 feet beyond the edge of the
building or structure on which attached.
All site plan details required by §
190-124 shall be provided and shall include:
A. The site boundaries; tower location; existing and proposed structures,
including accessory structures; existing and proposed ground-mounted
equipment; vehicular parking and access; and uses, structures and
land use designations on the site and abutting parcels.
B. A landscape plan drawn to scale showing proposed landscaping, including species type, size, spacing, other landscape features and existing vegetation to be retained, removed or replaced (see §
190-13).
C. A report from a qualified expert certifying that the wireless telecommunications
tower and equipment facility comply with the latest structural and
wind loading requirements as set forth in the Building Officials and
Code Administrators (BOCA) International, Inc., Code or the Electronic
Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIA/TIA)
222 Revision F Standard, titled "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna
Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures" (or equivalent), as it may
be updated or amended, or such other code as may apply to these facilities,
including a description of the number and type of antennas it is designed
to accommodate.
D. A binding, irrevocable letter of commitment by the applicant to lease
excess space on the tower to other potential users at prevailing market
rates and conditions. The applicant's counsel shall simultaneously
submit a separate opinion of counsel expressing such counsel's opinion
as to the enforceability of such binding, irrevocable letter of commitment
by the Borough under the laws of the State of New Jersey. The letter
of commitment shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit.
The letter shall commit and be binding upon the tower owner and successors
in interest.
E. Elevations of the proposed tower and accessory building generally
depicting all proposed antennas, platforms, finish materials and all
other accessory equipment.
F. A copy of the lease or deed for the property.
G. A plan which shall reference all existing wireless telecommunications
facilities in the Borough, any such facilities in the abutting towns
which provide service to areas within Milford Borough, and any changes
proposed within the following twelve-month period, including plans
for new locations and the discontinuance or relocation of existing
facilities.
H. A three-hundred-sixty-degree perspective of the proposed tower at
the proposed location from distances of 1,000 feet, 1/2 mile, one
mile and two miles, drawn to an appropriate scale.
Federal Communications Commission licensed wireless telecommunications
providers are encouraged to construct and site their facilities with
a view toward sharing facilities with other utilities, co-locating
with other existing wireless facilities and accommodating the co-location
of other future facilities where technically, practically and economically
feasible.
Site plan application fees and escrows for wireless telecommunications installations shall be as set forth in §
190-139 of this chapter.
[Amended 5-16-2011 by Ord. No. 775-2011]
Site plan application fees and escrows for telecommunications installations shall be as prescribed in Chapter
10, Fees, of this Code.