[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 201.0, 3-4-1997]
Any use of buildings, structures, premises, land or parts thereof
legally existing at the effective date of the ordinance from which
this chapter is derived and made nonconforming by the provisions of
this chapter or any amendments thereto may be continued as legally
nonconforming uses, subject to the provisions of this article. Notwithstanding
any provisions in this article to the contrary, no existing yard sale
or yard sale operation shall be construed as being allowed as a nonconforming
use which may be continued unless otherwise in accordance with the
provisions of this chapter relating to yard sales.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 202.0, 3-4-1997]
If any nonconforming use ceases for any reason for a period
of one year or more, any subsequent use shall conform to the provisions
of this chapter, unless specifically excepted in this chapter.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 203.0, 3-4-1997]
Whenever a nonconforming use is changed to a permitted use,
the use of the land shall not thereafter revert to a nonconforming
use, notwithstanding any other provisions of this article.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 204.1, 3-4-1997]
(a) A type 1 nonconformity is a legal nonconformity with regard to the
use of, or activity undertaken upon a property. Except as provided
in this chapter, such nonconforming use shall not be expanded so as
to increase the portion of a property or structure located thereon
used for such a nonconforming use or activity.
(b) An application to expand a legally nonconforming business or commercial
use that would increase the presently used legally nonconforming use
by up to 25% of the area presently in nonconforming use shall be approved
by the Planning Board if all of the following conditions are met:
(1)
The expansion will not result in unsafe or unhealthful conditions
either in the structure or in an area lying within a three-hundred-foot
radius of the proposed expansion;
(2)
The parking needs generated by such expansion can and will be
met by off-street parking on the premises. It is the intent of this
provision to assess only the parking needs of the expansion and not
the adequacy of parking or availability of parking of the existing
legally nonconforming use;
(3)
The character of the appearance of the exterior of the structure
containing the use shall not be substantially changed; and
(4)
The expansion shall take place within an existing structure
and shall not involve changing the footprint of the structure in which
the use takes place.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 204.2, 3-4-1997; Ord. No. 67-1998, 4-21-1998]
(a) A type 2 nonconformity involves a situation in which the existing use of a property is legally conforming or legally nonconforming; however, some portion of a legally existing structure located upon the property is legally nonconforming with regard to the standards set forth for each district in article
V of this chapter.
(b) No structure or use which is nonconforming with regard to height
may be expanded or increased with regard to such existing nonconforming
height.
(c) A vacant existing lot of record as of July 26, 1985, which does not
meet the area and/or frontage requirements of the district wherein
located may be built upon, provided that relief from the standard
district lot line setbacks is granted, provided that no setback shall
in any circumstance be less than eight feet.
(d) Any dwelling structure or accessory building on an existing conforming
or nonconforming lot of record as of July 26, 1985, may be expanded
or enlarged, provided the following conditions are met:
(1)
The expansion shall not bring any portion of such structure
any closer to a lot line than the existing nonconforming structure.
This provision shall not, however, prevent an upward expansion of
an existing structure, provided such upward expansion is no closer
to a lot line than the existing nonconforming structure setbacks;
and
(2)
An expansion of a structure constructed within what would normally
be required for a lot line setback shall be limited during the lifetime
of the structure or replacement structure to a twelve-foot extension
of the existing nonconforming structure or 30% of the usable area
of the structure, whichever is greater.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 204.3, 3-4-1997]
(a) A type 3 nonconformity is a vacant lot which is legally nonconforming
with regard to dimensional requirements or area required by this chapter.
(b) A lot with a type 3 nonconformity may be built upon, provided that
relief from the standard district lot line setbacks is granted, provided
that no setback in any circumstance shall be less than eight feet.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 204.4, 3-4-1997]
A type 4 nonconformity is an existing commercial or industrial
structure on a conforming lot of record or a legally nonconforming
lot of record, which structure is legally nonconforming with regard
to setbacks. Such structures may be expanded, provided the expansion
will meet all of the setbacks that are applicable to the district.
This provision shall not prevent an upward expansion of the original
structure, provided the height limit in the district shall not be
exceeded and provided such upward expansion is no closer to a lot
line than the existing nonconforming structure setbacks.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 204.5, 3-4-1997; Ord. No. 14/15-2000, 8-15-2000]
A type 5 nonconformity is an expansion of a legally nonconforming use located in the General Purpose "A" District, General Purpose "B" District, Residential/Agricultural I District, Residential/Agricultural II District, Protection Rural District and Airport Growth Districts, and that section of the Residential Growth District that is located west of the Route One By-Pass. Any such expansion shall be approved as provided in section
102-103, provided that the expansion does not include land which has been acquired after the enactment of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived, March 14, 1995, and provided that all applicable standards are met.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 205.0, 3-4-1997; Ord. No. 42-1997, 4-15-1997]
Whenever the Planning Board receives an application for a change,
expansion or replacement of an existing legally nonconforming use,
the Planning Board shall hold a public hearing before deciding on
the application. At least 13 days prior to the hearing, the applicant
shall give written notice of the nature of the application and the
time and date of the public hearing to owners of land lying within
a one-hundred-fifty-foot radius of the proposed expansion of the land
on which the nonconforming use exists. It shall be the responsibility
of the applicant to identify the owners of land entitled to notice
under this section.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 206.0, 3-4-1997]
Fees for permits under this article shall be established by
the City Council. Fees shall be nonrefundable and shall be paid upon
application for the permit.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 207.0, 3-4-1997]
A lot created subsequent to the enactment of the ordinance from
which this chapter is derived which does not meet both the dimensional
requirements and acreage requirements of this chapter is declared
to be illegal. Additionally, any lot previously created which was
illegal when created due to the failure of such lot to meet the dimensional
requirements or acreage requirements of the then-existing ordinance
continues to remain an illegal lot. No permit shall be approved for
an illegal lot.
[Ord. No. 28-1997, § 208.0, 3-4-1997]
The Planning Board may grant permission for the replacement
of a nonconforming structure, provided the following criteria are
met:
(1) A nonconforming structure may be replaced within one year of the
structure being destroyed, removed or deemed unsafe by the code enforcement
officer;
(2) The replacement shall not be located on the property owned by an
abutter or within the limits of the road right-of-way;
(3) The replacement structure shall not constitute an expansion of a
nonconforming use; and
(4) The replacement structure shall not involve an increase of a nonconforming
height of the structure being replaced.
[Ord. No. 12-2005, 8-3-2004]
Any structure, lot or use of land that conforms to the provisions
of this article as of the effective date of adoption or amendment
of the provision or requirement concerned, but is subsequently made
nonconforming as to that provision or requirement as a result of a
governmental action (including any municipal or state road project,
property purchase, or eminent domain acquisition), shall be treated
as a legally existing nonconformity as to that provision or requirement
in accordance with this chapter.