A.
This district is intended to allow for greater freedom, imagination,
and flexibility in the development of land while ensuring substantial
compliance with the intent of the normal district regulations of this
chapter. To this intent it allows diversification and variation in
the relationship of uses, structures, open spaces, and heights of
structures in developments conceived and planned as comprehensive
and cohesive unified projects. It is further intended to encourage
more rational and economic development with relationship to public
services and to encourage the preservation of open land.
B.
Permitted. The unified and planned development of a site, in single
or corporate ownership at the time of development, may be permitted
in a PD Planned Development Overlay District, without the customary
division into individual lots, or without specific compliance with
the district regulations as applicable to individual lots, subject
to the regulations as hereinafter provided in this article.[1]
A.
Size allowed. For the purpose of this chapter all planned development
projects shall be classified as follows and be limited to parent parcels
of not less than the size indicated:
|
Minimum Size of District
(square feet)
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Residential
|
200,000
| |
|
Commercial
|
200,000
| |
|
Industrial
|
No minimum
| |
|
Mixed
|
200,000
|
B.
C.
D.
Application of regulations.
(1)
Uses and structures. In addition to the uses permitted in the underlying
district any other use may be permitted as herein designated above
consistent with the criteria established in the basis for approval
below.
(2)
Individual uses and structures in a planned development project district
need not comply with the specific building location, height, building
size, lot size, and open space requirements of the underlying basic
district, provided that the spirit and intent of such requirements
are complied with in the total development plan for such project consistent
with the criteria as established in the basis for approval below.
(3)
Applicable underlying zoning districts. The PD Planned Development
Overlay District may be applied to all zoning districts.
(4)
Density. For specific project density computation, the allowable
maximum unit density shall be determined by dividing the gross area
of the planned development (exclusive of existing public right-of-way
or public open space easement) by the square feet per family as required
by the district intended. In the case of mixed-use developments, a
separate density calculation shall be computed for each defined use
in the development. (Example: On an eighty-acre planned development,
40 acres are intended for RM-1 uses and 40 acres are intended for
RS-1 uses; the density computations would be run separately as follows:
1,742,400 square feet divided by 5,000 square feet per unit for RM-1
and 1,742,400 square feet divided by 30,000 square feet per unit for
RS-1.)
(5)
Density bonus. The total allowable maximum density in a planned development may increase no more than 10% above the amount of units calculated in Subsection D(4) above upon recommendation of the Plan Commission that the increased density is justified in terms of the relationship to open areas, service demand, and the total quality and character of the project. In no case, however, shall the provisions of § 400-82 be waived.
A.
Petition. Petition may be made to the Common Council by the owner
or agent of property proposed for such development to amend the Zoning
Map by the overlaying of a PD District in order to permit the application
of the provisions of this article to such development. Such petition
shall be accompanied by a fee, as from time to time established by
resolution of the Common Council, and the following information:
(1)
A statement describing the general character of intended development
along with such other pertinent information as may be necessary to
a determination that the contemplated arrangement or use makes it
desirable to apply regulations and requirements differing from those
ordinarily applicable under this chapter.
(2)
A general development plan of the project showing the intended use
or uses of land, the dimensions and location of proposed structures
and of areas to be reserved for vehicular and pedestrian circulation,
parking, public uses such as schools, and playgrounds, parks, landscaping,
and other open spaces and architectural drawings and sketches illustrating
the design and character of the proposed uses and the physical relationship
of the uses.
B.
Referral to Plan Commission. Such petition shall be referred to the
Plan Commission and processed as any other petition for zoning change.
Upon completion of necessary study and investigation the Plan Commission
shall make its recommendation to the Common Council as to the appropriateness
and desirability of the proposed zoning change, the suitability of
the building, site and development plans, and any additional conditions
which it may feel necessary or appropriate. The Plan Commission can
make its recommendation before or after the scheduled public hearing
date.[1]
D.
Where a proposed development includes uses permitted only as conditional grants pursuant to Article XIV, compliance with the procedural and general requirements set forth as the basis for approval under this article shall supplant the requirement for separate processing of a petition for conditional use grant pursuant to Article XIV.
E.
At the time the PD planned unit development is presented to the City
Plan Commission for final approval, the developer shall pay to the
City the costs incurred by the City for planning and engineering fees,
including but not limited to costs for checking plans, field checking
and consultations.
A.
Basis for approval. The Plan Commission in making its recommendations
and the Common Council in making its determination shall give consideration
and satisfy themselves as to the following:
(1)
That the proponents of the proposed development have demonstrated
that they intend to start construction within a reasonable period
following the approval of the project and requested overlay of the
PD District, that the project appears economically sound, that adequate
financing is possible, and that the development will be carried out
according to a reasonable construction schedule satisfactory to the
City.
(2)
That the proposed development is consistent in all respects with
the spirit and intent of this chapter, is in conformity with the general
plans for community development, and would not be contrary to the
general welfare and economic prosperity of the City or of the immediate
neighborhood, that the specific development plans have been prepared
with competent professional advice and guidance, and that the benefits
and improved design of the resultant development justify the variation
from the normal requirements of this chapter through the application
of the PD Planned Development Overlay District.
(3)
In the case of proposed residential developments:
(a)
That such development will create an attractive residential
environment of sustained desirability and economic stability, compatible
with the character established for the area by the community Comprehensive
Plan, and where the economic impact of the development in terms of
income levels, property values, and service demands is at least as
beneficial to the community as that which could be anticipated under
the base zoning.
(b)
The population composition of the development will not alter
adversely the impact upon school or other municipal service requirements
as anticipated under the existing basic zoning and Comprehensive Plan.
(c)
That the project will not create traffic or parking demand incompatible
with that anticipated under the Comprehensive Plan.
(d)
That the total average residential density of the project will
be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, except as may be modified
by this article.
(e)
That the aggregate open space of the development will be no
less than would have resulted from the application of open space requirements
of the underlying districts.
(f)
That adequate guarantee is provided for permanent retention
as open space area of the residual open land area resulting from the
application of these regulations, either by private reservation for
the use of the residents within the development or by dedication to
the public.
[1]
In the case of a PD Planned Development District, private preservation
of the open space area shall be guaranteed and shall be protected
against building and development by conveying to the municipality
as part of the conditions for project approval an open space easement
over such open area restricting the area against any future building
or use except as is consistent with that of providing landscaped open
space for the esthetic and recreational benefit of the surrounding
residences. Buildings or uses for noncommercial recreational or cultural
purposes compatible with the open space objective may be permitted
only where specifically authorized as part of the project plan or
subsequently with the express approval of the Common Council following
approval of building, site and operation plans by the Plan Commission.
[2]
The care and maintenance of such open space reservations shall be
ensured either by establishment of an appropriate management organization
for the project or by agreement with the municipality for establishment
of a special service district for the project area where the municipality
shall provide the necessary maintenance service and levy the cost
thereof as a special assessment on the tax bills of properties within
the project area. In any case the Common Council shall have the right
to carry out and levy an assessment for the cost of any maintenance
which it feels necessary if it is not otherwise taken care of to the
satisfaction of the Common Council. The manner of assuring maintenance
and assessing such cost to individual properties shall be determined
prior to the approval of the final project plans and shall be included
in the title to each property.
[3]
Ownership and tax liability of private open space reservation shall
be established in a manner acceptable to the municipality and made
a part of the conditions of the plan approval.
(4)
In the case of proposed PD planned development overlays for commercial
developments:
(a)
That the economic practicality of the proposed development can
be justified on the basis of purchasing potential, competitive relationship
and demonstrated tenant interest.
(b)
That the proposed development will be adequately served by off-street
parking and truck service facilities.
(c)
That the locations for entrances and exits have been designed
to prevent unnecessary interference with the safe and efficient movement
of traffic on surrounding streets, and that the development will not
create an effect upon the general traffic pattern of the area incompatible
with that anticipated under the Comprehensive Plan.
(d)
That the architectural design, landscaping, control of lighting,
and general site development will result in an attractive and harmonious
service area compatible with and not creating an effect upon the property
values of the surrounding neighborhood incompatible with that anticipated
under the Comprehensive Plan.
(5)
In the case of PD planned development overlays for mixed-use developments:
(a)
That the proposed mixture of uses produces a unified composite
which is compatible within itself and which as a total developmental
entity is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and consistent
with the general objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
(b)
That the various types of uses conform to the general requirements
as herein set forth applicable to projects of such use character.
(c)
The allowable maximum residential density may be computed by
dividing the gross area of the planned development by the square feet
per family as required by the district intended (this is inclusive
of the area of the other proposed uses in the development). Example:
Planned development on 12 acres of land with eight acres for multifamily
residential and four acres for commercial still equals approximately
104 units (12 acres divided by 5,000 square feet per unit) upon recommendation
of the Plan Commission that the increased density is justified in
terms of the relationship to the denser area, the commercial area,
open areas, service demand, and the total quality and character of
the project.
(d)
The total allowable maximum density may increase no more than
10% above the amount of units calculated above upon recommendation
of the Plan Commission that the increased density is justified in
terms of the relationship to open areas, service demand, and the total
quality and character of the project.
B.
Determination.
(1)
The Common Council after due consideration may deny the petition,
approve the petition as submitted or approve the petition subject
to additional conditions.
(2)
The approval of a petition and consequent amending of the Zoning Map by overlay of the PD District shall be based on and include as conditions thereto the building, site and operation (BSO) plans for the development as well as all other commitments offered or required with regard to project value, character or other factor pertinent to assuring that the project will be developed basically as presented in the official submittal plans as approved by the Common Council and shall be mapped and recorded as provided for conditional uses under Article XIV of this chapter. Such plans, however, need not necessarily be completely detailed at the time of overlay zoning, provided they are of sufficient detail to satisfy the Plan Commission and Common Council as to the general character, scope, and appearance of the proposed development. Such preliminary plan shall at least designate the pattern of proposed streets, the basic pattern of land use, and the size and arrangement of lots and illustrate a "typical" example of the development proposed. The approval of such preliminary plan shall be conditioned upon the subsequent submittal and approval of more specific and detailed plans as the development progresses.
(3)
Any subsequent change or addition to the plans or use shall first be submitted for approval to the Common Council, and if in the opinion of the Common Council upon recommendation of the Plan Commission such change or addition constitutes a substantial alteration of the original plan, a public hearing before the Common Council shall be required and notice thereof given pursuant to Article II of this chapter.
(4)
The provisions of Article XIV governing termination of the conditional grant shall apply to such group project development.
(5)
Application for a planned development. In order to fulfill the requirements
of the planned development provisions, the City Planning Division
may utilize additional policies and procedures along with required
checklists, letters of intent, necessary inspections, follow-ups,
bonding requirements, and other legal assurances that the provisions
of planned development are carried out systematically and on a uniform
basis.
The revision of this Zoning Ordinance in 2006 repealed a few past-approved PDs due to no development occurring in those areas. The PDs found in § 400-84 and below are the districts that continue to operate as approved.
A.
Approved Planned Development Districts shall be found below in this
article and shall state the development requirements and parameters
as approved by the Common Council.
B.
The actual text description outlining the parameters for each planned
development shall be approved with the rezoning ordinance if all are
known. Zoning Code text descriptions may be approved at a later time
with the final plat and/or developer's agreement by resolution of
the Common Council if needed in order to account for all aspects and
parameters of an individual planned development. (Note: When a rezoning
of a PD is approved before the final plat and developer's agreement
approvals for a development, the rezoning ordinance will state that
"The ordinance is in full force and effect from and after passage
and publication subject to approval of the final plat, subdivider's
agreement and the Zoning Ordinance language that specifically outlines
the parameters of the PD.") The language that outlines the specifics
of the PD will be passed by resolution of the Common Council concurrent
with the final plat and developer's agreement approvals.
C.
Amendments to existing PD text descriptions shall be approved by
ordinance of the Common Council concurrent with the determination
of nonsubstantial change resolutions.
A.
The Parkland Planned Development consists of approximately 55 acres
containing 117 single-family parcels and six outlots. The development
is made of three plats, Parkland Nos. 1, 2, and 3 Subdivisions all
generally located in the NW 1/4 of Section 10 and the SW 1/4 of Section
3 west of Lannon Drive. The Parkland No. 1 development consists of
45 single-family parcels and two outlots, the Parkland No. 2 development
consists of 43 single-family parcels and three outlots, and the Parkland
No. 3 development consists of 29 single-family parcels and one outlot.
All developments were constructed in one phase each and are serviced
by City sewer and water. The six total outlots for the development
are for open space preservation and stormwater management.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a larger
planned development known as "Parkland Plaza." The original planned
development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban
Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and
B-4/PD Highway Business District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The majority of the commercial portion of the original Parkland
Plaza PD was dissolved as the commercial entities were closed and
razed. The remaining areas are the Freedom Square PD and the Parkland
PD. Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated
into separate distinct PDs upon final plat, condominium plat, or building,
site and operation plan approvals.
(2)
The Parkland planned development was originally created under the
zoning of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and
widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density
of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the
requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks
be reduced to 25 feet, side offsets reduced to six and eight feet
and rear offsets to 20 feet. (In case a parcel has multiple street
setbacks the setback on one street corner can be 15 feet with the
rear offsets being eight feet and 20 feet.)
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Parkland proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 10-26-1964.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: November 1964.
(3)
Plan Commission Parkland No. 1 final plat approval: 10-20-1970.
(4)
Common Council Parkland No. 1 final plat approval: 12-8-1970, Resolution
No. 256-1970.
(5)
Plan Commission Parkland No. 2 final plat approval: 9-7-1971.
(6)
Common Council Parkland No. 2 final plat approval: per Resolution
No. 177-1971.
(7)
Plan Commission Parkland No. 3 final plat approval: 3-7-1972.
(8)
Common Council Parkland No. 3 final plat approval: 3-14-1972, Resolution
No. 029-1972.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Freedom Square Planned Development consists of approximately
eight acres on three parcels. Freedom Square is a condominium complex
that is generally located north of Janesville Road off of Briargate
Lane between Lannon Drive and Parkland Drive. The planned development
contains a total of 60 units with two twelve-family structures, four
eight-family structures, and one four-family structure along with
associated drainage facilities, accessory structures, parking, landscaping,
and accessways. The development was developed in a number of phases
and is all serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a larger
planned development known as "Parkland Plaza." The Parkland Plaza
was the first PD created in the City of Muskego. The original planned
development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban
Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District and
B-4/PD Highway Business District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The majority of the commercial portion of the original Parkland
Plaza PD was dissolved as the commercial entities were closed and
razed. The remaining areas are the Freedom Square PD and the Parkland
PD. Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated
into separate distinct PDs upon final plat, condominium plat, or building,
site and operation (BSO) plan approvals.
(2)
The Freedom Square planned development was originally created under
the zoning of B-4/PD Highway Business District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout
the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements
for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying
code subject to Plan Commission BSO approvals.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for multifamily residential
development consistent with the Freedom Square proposal.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if
required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial
change hearings if required.
A.
The Durham Meadows Planned Development contains approximately 50
acres with 236 total living units consisting of 62 parcels for two-family
structures (124 units), one parcel containing eight four-family structures
(32 units), seven parcels containing 10 eight-family structures (80
units), and one outlot. The development is located along Durham Drive
and Janesville Road just southwest of the Janesville Road/Woodland
Place intersection. The development is constructed in multiple phases
and is serviced by sewer and water. The Durham Meadows subdivision
was originally approved with various certified survey maps (CSMs),
apartment complexes, and condo plats succeeded by the final plat creating
the now Durham Meadows Planned Development. The multiple-family developments
were approved with the appropriate accessways and accessory structures.
The one outlot in the development is for the preservation of open
space.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RSA/PD Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout
the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the
underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 25 feet, all
side offsets to be reduced to 10 feet, and rear offsets to be 30 feet
(reduced to 10 feet for garages). The development is maximized on
the amounts of units allowed as all open space and square footage
has been used.
(2)
Various developer's agreements are approved with the final plat,
CSMs, and building, site and operation plans for the development by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-9-1972 per Ordinance No. 221.
(2)
Plan Commission rezoning amendment approval: 11-21-1995 per Resolution
No. 182-1985.
(3)
Common Council rezoning amendment approval: 11-28-1995 per Resolution
No. 226-1992.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 7-18-1972.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 7-25-1972 per Resolution No.
155-1972.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
for the multifamily parcels and RM-2 District for the two-family parcels
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District for the multifamily parcels and RM-2 District for the two-family
parcels subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District for the multifamily parcels and RM-2 District
for the two-family parcels subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Hale Park Meadows Planned Development consists of approximately
90 acres containing 166 single-family parcels, 14 two-family parcels
(Lots 1-5 of Block 1, Lots 1-2 of Block 2, and Lots 1-6 of Block 3)
and six outlots (totaling 194 units). The development was made of
one plat and is generally located off of the north side of Tess Corners
Drive between Woods Road and Janesville Road. The development is constructed
in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water. The six outlots for
the development are for open space preservation, stormwater management,
and dedication to the City for park purposes.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed a mixed-use development to
allow two-family structures on certain parcels. The PD changed various
requirements of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced
to 25 feet, side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets increased
to 30 feet (reduced to 10 feet for garages).
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Hale Park proposal. A subdivider's
agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
C.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
A.
The Pioneer Centre Planned Development contains approximately 9.25
acres with two parcels for multifamily residential use located off
the east side of Pioneer Drive just north of the Pioneer Drive/Racine
Avenue intersection. The northern parcel contains a complex that includes
two structures with 12 one-bedroom units each (total of 24 units).
The complex was approved with accessory structures, landscaping, and
appropriate access and parking. The southern parcel contains a condominium
complex that includes two two-unit structures, six four-unit structures,
and three six-unit structures (total of 46 units). The apartment complex
was approved with accessory structures, landscaping, and appropriate
access and parking. Both developments also have pools explicitly for
the use of the tenants. (The condominium development was also approved
with a commons building.) Overall, the planned development contains
a total of 70 units in 13 structures. The development is constructed
in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout
the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The originally approved PD allowed no more than
70 living units. The PD also allowed various structure placements
for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying
code subject to Plan Commission building, site and operation plan
(BSO) approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's
Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-2-1972.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-11-1972 per Ordinance No. 226.
(3)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 9-19-1972.
(4)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 4-3-1973 per Resolution No. 041-1973.
(5)
Plan Commission Phase II BSO approval: 10-21-1975 per Resolution
No. 113-1975.
(6)
Plan Commission Phase II BSO approval: 11-18-1975 per Resolution
No. 124-1975.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
[Amended 6-18-2015 by Ord. No. 1398]
A.
The Tudor Oaks Planned Development contains approximately 110 acres
within two parcels for single-family residential and institutional
uses located off the south side of McShane Drive just east of Durham
Drive. The development was originally part of the Mus-Kee-Guac development.
Tudor Oaks is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by sewer
and water. The lands consist of one large structure with living units
and nursing facilities and have approvals for associated landscaping,
access, accessory structures, and parking.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to provide an institutional mixed-use environment for
senior citizen living and care. The development is subject to the
developers receiving Plan Commission building, site and operation
plan (BSO) approval for site specifics as long as the PD does not
exceed the following:
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's
Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
(3)
Planned development rezoning amendments were approved in 2015 allowing
the bed count to go from 60 to 85 while reducing the amount of allowed
apartments from 300 to 275.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 4-24-1973 per Ordinance No. 250.
(2)
Common Council revised PD approval: 6-25-1974 per Resolution No.
116-1974.
(3)
Common Council PD agreement approval: 4-8-1975 per Resolution No.
099-1975.
(4)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 7-2-1974 per Resolution No. 086-1974.
(5)
Plan Commission amended BSO approval: 1-17-2006 per Resolution No.
136-2005.
(6)
Plan Commission 2015 rezoning approval: 6-2-2015 per Resolution No.
028-2015.
(7)
Common Council 2015 rezoning approval: 6-15-2015 per Ordinance No.
1398.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Lake Lore Planned Development consists of approximately 33 acres
containing 26 single-family parcels and three outlots. The development
was made of one plat and a plat redivision and is generally located
off of the north side of McShane Drive north of the Tudor Oaks development.
The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer
and water. The three outlots for the development are for open space
preservation, stormwater management, and a well site.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RSA/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the
underlying zoning, including front setbacks and side/rear offsets.
(Each lot varies, as such, see covenants.)
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Lake Lore proposal. A subdivider's
agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 4-24-1973 per Ordinance No. 250.
(2)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 7-6-1976 per Resolution No.
075-1976.
(3)
Common Council final plat approval: 8-10-1976 per Resolution No.
134-1976.
(4)
Plan Commission redivision final plat approval: 6-7-1977 per Resolution
No. 075-1977.
(5)
Common Council redivision final plat approval: 6-14-1977 per Resolution
No. 138-1977.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Lake Brittany Planned Development consists of approximately 82
acres containing 99 single-family parcels and two outlots. The development
was made of three plats and is generally located off of the north
side of McShane Drive between the Muskego border to the east and Cheviot
Road to the west. The Lake Brittany final plat included 76 single-family
parcels and two outlots. The Lake Brittany Addition No. 1 final plat
was a redivision of outlots from the original Lake Brittany development
and included 20 single-family parcels and one outlot. The Lake Brittany
Addition No. 2 final plat was a redivision of an outlot from the Lake
Brittany Addition No. 1 development and included three single-family
parcels and one outlot. The development is constructed in one phase
and is serviced by sewer and water. The outlots for the development
are for open space preservation and stormwater management.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RSA/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be 35 feet,
side offsets be 10 feet and rear offsets be 20 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Lake Brittany proposal. A subdivider's
agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 11-27-1973 per Ordinance No. 263.
(2)
Plan Commission SW rezoning approval: 12-6-1988 per Resolution No.
107-1988.
(3)
Common Council SW rezoning approval: 5-4-1989 per Ordinance No. 644.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 6-7-1977 per Resolution No.
072-1977.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 6-14-1977 per Resolution No.
137-1977.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 7-21-1987 per
Resolution No. 100-1987.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 7-28-1987 per
Resolution No. 153-1987.
(8)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 12-5-1989 per
Resolution No. 219-1989.
(9)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 12-12-1989 per
Resolution No. 323-1989.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Guernsey Meadows Planned Development consists of approximately
54.5 acres containing 101 single-family parcels. The development was
made of two plats, Country Brook Estates and one addition, both generally
located off of the south side of Janesville Road between Martin Drive
and Bay Lane Drive. The Guernsey Meadows development consists of 70
single-family parcels and three outlots, and the Guernsey Meadows
Addition No. 1 development consists of 31 single-family parcels and
one outlot. All developments were constructed in one phase each and
are serviced by City sewer and water. The four total outlots for the
development are for open space preservation, City park dedication,
and public utilities.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced
to 30 feet (25 feet in the case of multiple street setbacks on one
side), side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets increased
to 30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Guernsey Meadows proposal. A subdivider's
agreement was approved with the final plats for each development by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 2-11-1975 per Ordinance No. 297.
(2)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 9-2-1975 per Resolution No.
089-1975.
(3)
Common Council final plat approval: 9-23-1975 per Resolution No.
212-1975.
(4)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 5-17-1977 per
Resolution No. 061-1977.
(5)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 1-3-1978 per Resolution
No. 002-1978.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Kristin Downs Planned Development consists of approximately 49
acres containing 83 single-family parcels and four outlots. The development
is generally located south of Janesville Road and east of Pioneer
Drive. The development was constructed in one phase and is serviced
by City sewer and water. The four outlots are reserved for open space
preservation, including stormwater management areas, well house areas,
and subdivision recreation areas, including tennis courts and a pool.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced
to 30 feet (25 feet in the case of multiple street setbacks on one
side), side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets increased
to 30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Kristin Downs proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 9-3-1974 per Resolution No. 127-1974.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-24-1975 per Ordinance No. 304.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 4-20-1976 per Resolution No.
032-1976.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 5-11-1976 per Resolution No.
059-1976.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Lake Meadows Planned Development consists of approximately 132.5
acres containing 206 single-family parcels and one outlot. The development
is located off of Kelsey Drive just east of Crowbar Drive and stretches
south from Kelsey to Lake Denoon. The final plat included one outlot
that was dedicated to the City for park purposes and is now zoned
for a City park. The development was constructed in one phase and
is serviced by the Norway Sewer Service District and a private water
trust.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages while preserving
the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also
changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning, including
reducing all front setbacks to 35 feet, reducing side offsets to 10
feet, and enlarging rear offsets to 30 feet, except for accessory
structures which are allowed a ten-foot rear offset.
[Amended 3-22-2012 by Ord. No. 1351]
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Lake Meadows proposed density. A developer's
agreement was approved with the final plat by the City's Common Council
outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 12-5-1978 per Resolution No. 211-1978.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 12-27-1978 per Ordinance No. 357.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 3-6-1979 per Resolution No.
022-1979.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-27-1979 per Resolution No.
048-1979.
(5)
Common Council developer's agreement approval: 4-10-1979 per Resolution
No. 068-1979.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Woodcrest Heights Planned Development originally consisted of
approximately 132.5 acres containing 72 single-family parcels and
three outlots. The development was made of two plats, Woodcrest Heights
and Woodcrest Heights Addition No. 1, generally located on the northwest
corner of Racine Avenue and Woods Road. The Woodcrest Heights development
consists of 82 lots and one outlot. Twenty-two lots are platted for
single-family, 21 lots are platted for two-family, and Lot 18 is platted
for future multifamily use. (The restrictions dictate that Lot 18
shall be a multifamily site for no more than 48 one- or two-bedroom
units and that the developers reserve the right to divide Lot 18 for
the purpose of multifamily use.) The Woodcrest Heights Addition No.
1 development has 38 lots all for single-family use. Both developments
were constructed in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer
and water. The one outlot platted as part of the original Woodcrest
Heights Subdivision was dedicated to the City of Muskego at the time
of recording.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to transition higher density uses (in the form of multifamily
units) from the existing industrial park to the north down to single-family
uses. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying
zoning, including allowing reduced side street setbacks for corner
lots to be 25 feet, reducing all side offsets to 15 feet, and enlarging
rear offsets to 25 feet.
(2)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by the City's
Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-16-1987 per Resolution No. 092-1987.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-12-1988 per Ordinance No. 594.
(3)
Common Council Addition No. 1 rezoning approval: 4-24-1990 per Ordinance
No. 676.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-3-1987 per Resolution No.
166-1987.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 1-12-1988 per Resolution No.
004-1988.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 3-20-1990 per
Resolution No. 046-1990.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 4-24-1990 per
Resolution No. 094-1990.
C.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
A.
The Golden Country Estates Planned Development consists of approximately
26 acres containing 47 single-family parcels. The development was
made of one plat and is generally located off of the north side of
Janesville Road between Moorland Road and Woodland Place. The development
is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements of the
underlying zoning, including side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear
offsets increased to 25 feet. (Setbacks must be 50 feet from any parcel
abutting the Janesville Road right-of-way and corner lots may have
a twenty-five-foot front setback on the opposite side of the forty-foot
front setback.)
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Golden Country proposal. A subdivider's
agreement was approved with the final plat for the development by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Bay Breeze Planned Development contains approximately 30 acres
and a variety of parcels located on the south side of Janesville Road
along Little Muskego Lake just east of Pioneer Drive. The development
consists of 11 four-unit condominiums, five six-unit condominiums,
and four larger parcels for single-family use totaling 78 dwelling
units. Multiple certified survey maps and condominium plats ultimately
created parcels for multifamily condo use and parcels for single-family
use. The condominium complex was approved with accessory structures,
landscaping, and appropriate access and parking. The development is
constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District and B-2/PD Local Service Center District with a Planned Development
Overlay District.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the City's
Common Council outlining the individual guarantees. The original development
called for 74 units of condominiums to the east and a mixed-use facility
to the west with an option of having 10 single-family residential
units in place of the mixed-use facility if it was never constructed.
The current planned development has the 74 units of multifamily condominiums
and has replaced the once proposed mixed-use facility with four parcels
of single-family residential. Overall, the planned development zoning
is put in place to allow the developers to use the amount of units
disbursed throughout the developed area while preserving a specific
density, outlined in the approved developer's agreement. The PD also
allowed the mixed uses of single-family and multifamily to co-exist
in the same development. Setbacks and offsets of the multifamily uses
were established under the original approvals, and any new buildings
will require approval of the City's Plan Commission. Setbacks and
offsets for the single-family uses follow the zoning restrictions
of the RL-3 Lakeshore Residence District. Overall, the developer's
agreement allows the following:
(a)
Seventy-four units of multifamily condominiums to the east and
a mixed use facility to the west (10 units of single-family residential
in place of mixed-use facility if never constructed).
(b)
No more than one boat slip per multifamily unit, and in no case
can the amount of boat slips exceed 74 for the multifamily uses of
the PD.
(c)
Each private boat slip shall be only available to the owners
of the condominium, and no condo unit shall own more than one slip.
(d)
No more than 25 boat slips are allowed for the originally proposed
mixed-use facility and these slips shall not be available for rent
but for the sole use of the mixed-use facility. (Mixed-use facility
and boat slip clause was amended out of the original developer's agreement
and boat slips as necessary for single-family units were allowed.)
(e)
Shall the mixed-use facility not be constructed as part of the
PD the developer has the right to construct a maximum of 10 single-family
homes in its place. (Mixed-family use facility was amended out of
the original developer's agreement and single-family units were allowed.)
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Meadow Green West Planned Development consists of approximately
110 acres containing 176 single-family parcels. The development was
made of four plats, Country Brook Estates and three additions all
generally located off of the west side of Lannon Drive between Woods
Road and Janesville Road. The Meadow Green West development consists
of 44 single-family parcels, the Meadow Green West Addition No. 1
development consists of 39 single-family parcels, the Meadow Green
West Addition No. 2 development consists of 39 single-family parcels,
and the Meadow Green West Addition No. 3 development consists of 54
single-family parcels. All developments were constructed in one phase
each and are serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced
to 35 feet and all side and rear offsets be 15 feet for the original
phase and thirty-five-foot setbacks and all side and rear offsets
be 10 feet for the first, second, and third additions.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family residential
development consistent with the Country Brook Estates proposal. A
subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the
final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining
the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 4-5-1988 per Resolution No. 039-1988.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 11-22-1988 per Ordinance No. 628.
(3)
Common Council Addition No. 1 rezoning approval: 6-26-1990 per Ordinance
No. 686.
(4)
Common Council Addition No. 2 rezoning approval: 3-26-1991 per Ordinance
No. 711.
(5)
Common Council Addition No. 3 rezoning approval: 1-28-1992 per Ordinance
No. 743.
(6)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-15-1988 per Resolution No.
204-1988.
(7)
Common Council final plat approval: 11-22-1988 per Resolution No.
252-1988.
(8)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 6-19-1990 per
Resolution No. 111-1990.
(9)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 6-26-1990 per
Resolution No. 163-1990.
(10)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 10-2-1990
per Resolution No. 172-1990.
(11)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 3-26-1991
per Resolution No. 060-1991.
(12)
Plan Commission Addition No. 3 final plat approval: 8-20-1991
per Resolution No. 147-1991.
(13)
Common Council Addition No. 3 final plat approval: 1-28-1992
per Resolution No. 032-1992.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Breann Ridge Planned Development contains approximately five
acres with six parcels for multifamily residential use located on
Jacobs Court a few blocks south of the Janesville Road/Parkland Drive
intersection. The development was originally approved as a final plat
allowing eight units of multifamily on each parcel. The apartment
structures are now condominiums (known as Parkridge Condominiums)
and the overall development totals 48 living units (eight units in
six structures) with associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping,
and accessways. The development is constructed in multiple phases
and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout
the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan (a ten-percent bonus in density was granted as
part of the PD rezoning). The PD also allowed various structure placements
for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying
code subject to Plan Commission building, site and operation plan
(BSO) and Common Council condominium plat approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the
City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 4-17-1990 per Resolution
No. 048a-1990.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 11-13-1990 per Ordinance No.
698.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-6-1990 per Resolution
No. 188-1990.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 11-13-1990 per Resolution
No. 260-1990.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Overlook Bay Planned Development consists of approximately 29
acres on two parcels and is generally located on the southwest corner
of Janesville Road and Racine Avenue behind the Muskego Centre planned
development. The development is originally divided by certified survey
map. The planned development contains a total of 152 units with 19
eight-family structures. The development was approved in two phases
with 13 eight-family structures in Phase 1 and the remaining six eight-family
structures in Phase 2. The multifamily condominiums are approved along
with associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping, and accessways.
City sewer and water support the multifamily condominiums.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout
the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements
and private accessways for the residential uses within the flexibility
of the underlying code subject to Plan Commission building, site and
operation plan (BSO) approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the
City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for multifamily
residential development consistent with the Overlook Bay proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if
required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial
change hearings if required.
A.
The Lake Forest Planned Development consists of approximately 63
acres containing 170 single-family parcels and eight outlots. The
development is generally located from Janesville Road to Hillendale
Drive northeast of the Waukesha County Muskego Park property. The
development was made of three plats, Lake Forest, Lake Forest Addition
No. 1, and Lake Forest Addition No. 2. The Lake Forest development
consisted of 59 lots and five outlots. The Lake Forest Addition No.
1 development consisted of 86 lots and three outlots and was a redivision
of Outlot 4 from the original Lake Forest Subdivision. The Lake Forest
Addition No. 2 development consisted of 25 lots and one outlot and
was a redivision of Outlot 8 from the Lake Forest Addition No. 1 Subdivision.
(1)
All developments constructed are serviced by City sewer and
water. The eight existing outlots are for stormwater management, open
space preservation and Waukesha County park purposes.
(2)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and
widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density
of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the
requirements of the underlying zoning, including having increased
side offsets to all be 15 feet and rear offsets to be 20 feet.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Lake Forest proposal.
(4)
A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for
each development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual
guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission Lake Forest rezoning approval: 4-3-1990 per
Resolution No. 036-1990.
(2)
Common Council Lake Forest rezoning approval: 1-22-1991 per
Ordinance No. 705.
(3)
Common Council Lake Forest Addition No. 1 and No. 2 rezoning
approval: 10-22-1991 per Ordinance No. 726.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 10-16-1990 per Resolution
No. 178-1990.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 1-22-1991 per Resolution
No. 011-1991.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 9-3-1991
per Resolution No. 163-1991.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 10-22-1991
per Resolution No. 271-1991.
(8)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-7-1992
per Resolution No. 148-1992.
(9)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-14-1992
per Resolution No. 183-1992.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The College Square Planned Development contains approximately 12.1
acres with eight parcels for multifamily residential use, three parcels
for single-family use, and one outlot located off of College Avenue
on Regency Court and Hillendale Drive just east of Racine Avenue.
The development was originally approved as part of a final plat. The
planned development contains a total of 67 units with eight-family
structures (64 units) and three single-family structures along with
associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping, and accessways.
The development is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced
by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout
the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements
for the residential uses within the flexibility of the underlying
code subject to Plan Commission building, site and operation plan
(BSO) approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement is approved for the development by the
City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 3-19-1991 per Resolution
No. 024-1991.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 3-12-1991 per Ordinance No.
710.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 3-19-1991 per Resolution
No. 023-1991.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-26-1991 per Resolution
No. 063-1991.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Woods Road-Deback Planned Development consists of approximately
4.85 acres containing four two-family parcels. The development was
recorded by certified survey map and is generally located along the
north side of Woods Road immediately west of Woodside Estates and
Woodcrest Heights Subdivisions. The four lots are to contain only
two-unit row houses. The development is serviced by City sewer and
water. The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the multifamily two-unit structures on the platted lots.
The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning,
including having front setbacks to be 50 feet and having all side
and rear offsets be 15 feet.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Country Brook Estates Planned Development consists of approximately
41 acres containing 54 single-family parcels. The development was
made of two plats, Country Brook Estates and Country Brook Estates
Addition No. 1, and is generally located off of the north side of
Woods Road between Racine Avenue and Lannon Drive. The Country Brook
Estates development consists of 23 lots and the Country Brook Estates
Addition No. 1 development has 31 lots. Both developments were constructed
in one phase each and are serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-1/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including having side and rear offsets of
15 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Country Brook Estates
proposal. A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved
with the final plat for each development by the City's Common Council
outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 7-17-1990 per Resolution
No. 125-1990.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-14-1992 per Ordinance No.
736.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 8-6-1991 per Resolution
No. 135-1991.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 10-22-1991 per Resolution
No. 266-1991.
(5)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 2-18-1992
per Resolution No. 029-1992.
(6)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 3-10-1992
per Resolution No. 061-1992.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Stoney Creek Planned Development contains approximately 9.87
acres and consists of a fifty-two-unit retirement community (12 one-bedroom
units and 40 two-bedroom units). The development is generally located
off of Tess Corners Drive 1/4 mile south of the Tess Corners Drive/Janesville
Road intersection. The development is constructed in one phase and
is serviced by sewer and water. Rezoning approval in the form of a
multiple-family planned development was received from the City's Common
Council to allow the retirement community units to be incorporated
into one large structure. A building, site and operation plan (BSO)
outlining the parking, access, building elevations, landscaping, and
other improvements for the site was approved by the City's Plan Commission.
The planned development was originally created under the zoning of
RSM/PD Multiple-family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. A developer's agreement and letter of credit was
approved for the development by the City's Common Council outlining
the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-19-1992 per Resolution
No. 111-1992.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-9-1992 per Ordinance No.
754.
(3)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 9-4-1990 per Resolution No. 158-1990.
(4)
Plan Commission BSO amendment approval: 3-6-1993 per Resolution
No. 055-1993.
(5)
Plan Commission BSO Amendment No. 2 approval: 5-5-1998 per Resolution
No. 077-1998.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings and BSO amendments if
required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and BSO amendments
if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
and BSO amendments if required.
A.
The Plum Creek Planned Development consists of approximately 70 acres
containing 113 single-family parcels and five outlots. The development
is serviced by City sewer and water and is generally located between
Janesville Road and Woods Road just west of the Muskego Industrial
Park. The development was made of two plats, Plum Creek (52 lots)
and Plum Creek Addition No. 1 (61 lots and the five outlots). The
Plum Creek development is generally located along western Woods Road
just southeast of the Plum Creek East Subdivision and the Muskego
Industrial Park. City sewer and water service both developments. The
five outlots conserve the environmental areas, provide a private park
for the development, and provide stormwater management. Outlot 5 was
converted by the homeowners' association and developed into two lots
meeting the RS-2 zoning requirements.
(1)
The lands were originally approved as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence
District with a Planned Development Overlay District but later approved
as RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to have reduced lot sizes while preserving
the required density of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also
changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning for the
single-family parcels, including allowing reduced front setbacks to
35 feet, reduced side offsets to 10 feet, and a rear offset of 20
feet.
(2)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Common Council RS-2/PD rezoning approval: 11-25-1992 per Ordinance
No. 771.
(2)
Plan Commission RS-3/PD rezoning approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution
No. 019-2001.
(3)
Common Council RS-3/PD rezoning approval: 3-27-2001 per Ordinance
No. 1061.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 11-3-1992 per Resolution
No. 238-1992.
(5)
Common Council final plat approval: 11-24-1992 per Resolution
No. 284-1992.
(6)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 2-15-1994
per Resolution No. 033-1994.
(7)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 3-8-1994
per Resolution No. 053-1994.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Plum Creek East Planned Development consists of approximately
33 acres containing 40 lots and three outlots. The total development
allowed 108 units. The development is serviced by City sewer and water
and is generally located south of Janesville Road just west of the
Muskego Industrial Park.
(1)
The lands were originally approved as RS-2/PD Suburban Residence
District with a Planned Development Overlay District but later approved
as three separate planned developments consisting of the following:
(a)
Seven lots and 56 units (Lots 1 to 7 and Outlot 3 of Plum Creek
East) were approved as per the past RSM/PD Multiple-Family Residence
District with a Planned Development Overlay District and were allowed
an eight-family unit structure per lot. Building, site and operation
plan approvals were required in front of the City's Plan Commission.
(b)
Nineteen lots and 38 units (Lots 8 to 22 and Lots 37 to 40 of
Plum Creek East) were approved as per the past RSA/PD Attached Single-Family
Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District.
(c)
Fourteen units/lots (Lots 23 to 36 and Outlots 1 and 2 of Plum
Creek East) were approved as per the RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District
with a Planned Development Overlay District and were allowed single-family
structures upon them.
(2)
The planned development was originally put in place to allow
the developers to have varying lot sizes for the different types of
uses (multifamily, two-family, and single-family). Pedestrian access
and easements were also given at the time of final platting of the
development. The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the
underlying zoning for the single-family parcels, including allowing
reduced front setbacks to 35 feet, reduced side offsets to 10 feet,
and a rear offset of 20 feet.
(3)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission RS-2 to RS-2/PD rezoning approval: 10-19-1993
per Resolution No. 195-1993.
(2)
Common Council RS-2 to RS-2/PD rezoning approval: 2-22-1994
per Ordinance No. 830.
(3)
Plan Commission RS-2/PD to RS-3/PD, RSA/PD, and RSM/PD rezoning
approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution No. 020-2001.
(4)
Common Council RS-2/PD to RS-3/PD, RSA/PD, and RSM/PD rezoning
approval: 3-27-2001 per Ordinance No. 1060.
(5)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 2-1-1994 per Resolution
No. 022-1994.
(6)
Common Council final plat approval: 2-22-1994 per Resolution
No. 043-1994.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right.
(1)
Any use as permitted in the RCE District (for the single-family
parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(2)
Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District (for the multifamily
parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(3)
Any use as permitted in the RM-2 District (for the two-family
parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
(1)
Any accessory use permitted in the RCE District (for the single-family
parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(2)
Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1 District (for the multifamily
parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(3)
Any accessory use permitted in the RM-2 District (for the two-family
parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
(1)
Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District (for the single-family
parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(2)
Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District (for the
multifamily parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
(3)
Any conditional use permitted in the RM-2 District (for the
two-family parcels) subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Muskego Centre Planned Development consists of approximately
22 acres containing nine parcels. The development is located on the
northwest corner of Janesville Road and Racine Avenue and contains
a variety of commercial developments governed by Plan Commission approved
building, site and operation plans (BSO). The PD is constructed in
multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of B-2/PD Local Service Center District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use varying building placements, varied
commercial uses, and shared access points. All developments within
the PD are governed by individual building, site and operation plans
(BSO), and any changes requested of the underlying zoning may require
zoning substantial change hearings.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for commercial
development consistent with the Muskego Centre proposal.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 4-3-1990 per Resolution No.
036-1990.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-28-1994 per Ordinance No.
843.
(3)
Plan Commission CSM No. 1 approval: 8-7-1990 per Resolution
No. 142-1990.
(4)
Common Council CSM No. 1 approval: 12-11-1990 per Resolution
No. 291-1990.
(5)
Plan Commission CSM No. 2 approval: 7-19-1994 per Resolution
No. 144-1994.
(6)
Common Council CSM No. 2 approval: 7-26-1994 per Resolution
No. 157-1994.
(7)
Plan Commission CSM No. 3 approval: 7-19-1994 per Resolution
No. 145-1994.
(8)
Common Council CSM No. 3 approval: 7-26-1994 per Resolution
No. 158-1990.
(9)
Plan Commission CSM No. 4 approval: 2-15-2000 per Resolution
No. 032-2000.
(10)
Common Council CSM No. 4 approval: 2-22-2000 per Resolution
No. 046-2000.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in a commercial zoning
district subject to BSO approval and zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in a commercial
zoning district subject to BSO approval and zoning substantial change
hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in a commercial zoning district subject to BSO approval and zoning
substantial change hearings if required.
A.
The Deer Creek Planned Development consists of approximately 63 acres
containing 72 single-family parcels and three outlots. The development
was made of two plats, Deer Creek and Deer Creek Addition No. 1. The
Deer Creek development consists of 36 lots with 10 lots on Ricco Court
off of Lannon Drive just east of Tower Drive and has the remaining
26 lots on the east and west sides of Parkland Drive along Bridgeport
Circle and Bridgeport Way. The Deer Creek Addition No. 1 development
also has 36 lots and is just north of the original Deer Creek Subdivision.
The addition has three lots west of Parkland Drive and the rest of
the lots to the east of Parkland Drive along Casey Drive and Deer
Creek Court. Both developments were constructed in one phase each
and are serviced by City sewer and water. The three outlots conserve
the delineated wetlands in the area, and Outlot 1 of Deer Creek subdivision
contains the stormwater retention pond for the entire planned development.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD did not change any general requirements
of the underlying zoning, so all lots follow the requirements of the
City's RS-2 Suburban Residence District.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Deer Creek proposal. A
subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the
final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining
the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Common Council rezoning approval: 6-27-1995 per Ordinance No.
868.
(2)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 5-16-1995 per Resolution
No. 069-1995.
(3)
Common Council final plat approval: 6-27-1995 per Resolution
No. 137-1995.
(4)
Plan Commission Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 10-7-1997
per Resolution No. 197-1997.
(5)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 10-14-1997
per Resolution No. 238-1997.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Regency Senior Living Planned Development is located on approximately
21.5 acres of land on the northeast corner of Racine Avenue and Woods
Road. Ten and one-half acres of the development are preserved in an
open space easement with pedestrian paths. The development is strictly
for senior living as the minimum age of residents at the site is 62
years of age. The development consists of six eight-unit structures,
two thirty-two-unit buildings, one forty-two-unit building, one ninety-six-unit
building, and various commons and garage structures. The PD is allowed
up to 250 units on site (96 assisted living and 154 independent living).
The facility is made up of ample access, parking, and landscaping.
The planned development was originally created under the past zoning
of RSM/PD/OIP Multiple-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District and an Institutional Overlay District. The 2010 Comprehensive
Plan depicts the area for multiple-family developments consistent
with the Regency senior living proposal. A conditional use grant is
on file allowing the institutional use and immediate amenities. A
developer's agreement was part of the original approvals.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted by the RM-1 District
and existing BSO and conditional use grant (CUG) subject to zoning
substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted by the RM-1
District and existing BSO and CUG subject to zoning substantial change
hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
by the RM-1 District and existing BSO and CUG subject to zoning substantial
change hearings if required.
A.
The Miller Planned Development contains approximately 4.5 acres with
four parcels for two-family residential use located on the east side
of Racine Avenue across from Thornapple Trail. The development was
originally approved as a four-parcel certified survey map. Four apartment
structures containing two units each (total of eight units) are approved
by the City Plan Commission as part of a building, site and operation
plan (BSO) with associated accessory structures, parking, landscaping,
and accessways. The development is serviced by City sewer and private
water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the amount of units disbursed throughout
the developed area while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also was allowed for flexibility to the
developer with respect to building placement and the upkeep of landscaped
areas. The density allowed under the original PD is 20,000 square
feet of land area per unit.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and cash deposit agreement are approved
for the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual
guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-4-1997 per Resolution No.
019-1997.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 8-26-1997 per Ordinance No.
921.
(3)
Plan Commission CSM approval: 4-1-1997 per Resolution No. 072-1997.
(4)
Common Council CSM approval: 8-12-1997 per Resolution No. 178-1997.
(5)
Plan Commission BSO approval: 4-15-1997 per Resolution No. 077-1997.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Park Estates Planned Development consists of approximately 27
acres containing 29 lots and one outlot. The total development allowed
24 single-family units and five duplex lots (10 duplex units). The
development is serviced by City sewer and water and is generally located
on the north side of Janesville Road just east of Hillendale Drive.
The lands were originally approved as RS-1/PD Suburban Residence District
with a Planned Development Overlay District for the single-family
lots (Lots 1 to 12 and 18 to 29) and RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District
with a Planned Development Overlay District for the two-family lots
(Outlot 1 and Lots 13 to 17).
(1)
The Planned Development Overlay was put in place to allow reduced
lot widths and lot sizes and to allow the use of duplex lots near
the intersection of Janesville Road all in exchange for the preservation
of open space while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed one requirement of the two-family
parcels by allowing fifteen-foot side and rear offsets.
(2)
A developer's agreement was approved with the final plat by
the City's Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 3-18-1997 per Resolution
No. 054-1997.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 8-12-1997 per Ordinance No.
939.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 7-15-1997 per Resolution
No. 116-1997.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 8-12-1997 per Resolution
No. 183-1997.
C.
A.
The North Cape Farms Planned Development consists of approximately
25 acres containing 24 single-family parcels and one outlot. The development
was made of one plat and a certified survey map and is generally located
off of the east side of North Cape Road between Durham Drive and Schaefer
Road. The subdivision plat included 22 single-family parcels and one
outlot while the certified survey map is for two single-family parcels.
The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by City
sewer and water. The one outlot for the development is for open space
preservation and stormwater management.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RSE/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and widths on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks be reduced
to 30 feet (25 feet in the case of multiple street setbacks on one
side), side offsets reduced to 10 feet and rear offsets reduced to
10 feet (50 feet along North Cape Road).
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 11-3-1998 per Resolution
No. 185-1998.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-11-1999 per Ordinance No.
984.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 4-20-1999 per Resolution
No. 025-1999.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 4-27-1999 per Resolution
No. 078-1999.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Champions Village Planned Development consisted of five plats
containing approximately 110 acres with 204 single-family parcels
and seven outlots. The development is located on the northeast corner
area of Highway 36 and North Cape Road. The first plat, known as "Champions
Village of Country Club Villages" consisted of 83 single-family parcels
and two outlots. The second plat, known as "Champions Village Addition
No. 1 of Country Club Villages" consisted of 38 single-family parcels
and three outlots. The third plat, known as "Champions Village Addition
No. 2 of Country Club Villages" consisted of 29 single-family parcels
and no outlots. The fourth plat, known as "Champions Village Addition
No. 3 of Country Club Villages" consisted of 37 single-family parcels
and no outlots. The fifth plat, known as "The Reserve at Champions
Village" consisted of 17 single-family parcels and two outlots. Each
development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer and
water. The outlots in the subdivisions are for open space preservation
and stormwater maintenance. One outlot in The Reserve of Champions
Village is for future development purposes.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and
widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density
of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements
of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 30 feet,
all side offsets reduced to 10 feet, and rear offsets increased to
30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Champions Village proposal.
A subdivider's agreement was approved with the final plat for each
development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual
guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval (Champions Village and Additions
No. 1 and No. 2): 1-18-2000 per Resolution No. 020-2000.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval (Champions Village and Additions
No. 1 and No. 2): 2-8-2000 per Ordinance No. 1013.
(3)
Common Council rezoning approval (Champions Village Addition
No. 3): 1-25-2000 per Ordinance No. 1011.
(4)
Plan Commission rezoning approval (The Reserve at Champions
Village): 7-17-2001 per Resolution No. 102-2001.
(5)
Common Council rezoning approval (The Reserve at Champions Village):
8-28-2001 per Ordinance No. 1076.
(6)
Common Council Addition No. 1 final plat approval: 8-27-1996
per Resolution No. 190-1996.
(7)
Plan Commission Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-6-1999
per Resolution No. 075-1999.
(8)
Common Council Addition No. 2 final plat approval: 7-13-1999
per Resolution No. 118-1999.
(9)
Plan Commission Addition No. 3 final plat approval: 1-4-2000
per Resolution No. 005-2000.
(10)
Common Council Addition No. 3 of Country Club Villages final
plat approval: 1-25-2000 per Resolution No. 021-2000.
(11)
Common Council Addition No. 3 final plat reapproval: 3-28-2000
per Resolution No. 072-2000.
(12)
Plan Commission The Reserve final plat approval: 7-17-2001 per
Resolution No. 102-2001.
(13)
Common Council The Reserve final plat approval: 10-9-2001 per
Resolution No. 193-2001.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The original Quietwood Creek Planned Development consisted of approximately
140.6 acres containing 142 single-family parcels, one parcel for future
commercial development (approximately 28 acres) and seven outlots
(for open space conservation, utility easement, and stormwater management).
The development was made of one plat and is generally located between
Janesville Road and Woods Road south of the eastern Martin Drive/Janesville
Road intersection. The development is constructed in one phase and
is serviced by sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and
widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density
of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements
of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 30 feet
and rear offsets increased to 20 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Quietwood Creek proposal.
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the
final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining
the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-20-2000 per Resolution
No. 127-2000.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-25-2000 per Ordinance No.
1033.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 6-20-2000 per Resolution
No. 126-2000.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 7-25-2000 per Resolution
No. 157-2000.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Pleasant View Condominium Planned Development consists of approximately
11 acres and is generally located along the north side of Woods Road
1/2 mile west of the Racine Avenue/Woods Road intersection. The development
was originally recorded by two certified survey maps consisting of
six separate parcels and then later an approved condominium plat was
received.
(1)
The development contains areas for two-family structures and
preserves extensive environmental areas on the rear of the lots. The
development is generally located along the north side of Woods Road
1/2 mile west of the Racine Avenue/Woods Road intersection. The overall
development contains area for six two-family structures. The development
is serviced by City sewer and water.
(2)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RSA/PD Attached Single-Family District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the multifamily two-unit structures in various locations
on the platted lots. The PD did not change any general requirements
of the underlying zoning, so all lots follow the requirements of the
City's RSA Attached Single-Family Residence District.
(3)
Due to the existing environmental lands on the north end of
the PD, an open space management plan was approved and recorded. Also,
a developer's agreement was approved by the City's Common Council
outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 8-15-2000 per Resolution
No. 148-2000.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 9-26-2000 per Ordinance No.
1041.
(3)
Plan Commission condo plat approval: 12-18-2001 per Resolution
No. 188-2001.
(4)
Common Council condo plat approval: 1-22-2002 per Resolution
No. 016-2002.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-2 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-2
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Dreamland Planned Development contains approximately 42 acres
consisting of a total of six parcels. The PD was split by multiple
certified survey maps and is dependent on, if required, City approvals
of building, site and operation plans (BSO) and substantial change
hearings when new commercial entities are proposed. The development
is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and
water. The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of B-3/PD General Business District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. Developer's agreements are approved for the development
by the City's Common Council outlining the individual PD guarantees.
The planned development zoning is put in place to allow developers
flexibility in building placement, access, and other design requirements.
The flexibility allowed by the PD is dependent on City approval as
new commercial entities are proposed.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers,
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 7-7-1998 per Resolution No.
054-1998.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-9-2001 per Ordinance No.
1052.
(3)
Plan Commission additional rezoning approval: 6-5-2001 per Resolution
No. 084-2001.
(4)
Common Council additional rezoning approval: 7-24-2001 per Ordinance
No. 1074.
(5)
Plan Commission final CSM approval: 6-5-2001 per Resolution
No. 082-2001.
(6)
Common Council final CSM approval: 7-24-2001 per Resolution
No. 135-2001.
(7)
Plan Commission Jewel Osco BSO approval: 2-1-2000 per Resolution
No. 132C-1999.
(8)
Plan Commission Jewel Osco amended BSO approval: 6-5-2001 per
Resolution No. 081-2001.
(9)
Plan Commission Kohl's BSO approval: 6-5-2001 per Resolution
No. 080-2001.
(10)
Plan Commission medical clinic's BSO approval: 10-4-2011 per
Resolution No. 039-2011.
(11)
Plan Commission final CSM No. 2 approval: 12-6-2011 per Resolution
No. 049-2011.
(12)
Common Council final CSM No. 2 approval: 12-13-2011 per Resolution
No. 181-2011.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the B-3 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings and Plan Commission
approvals if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the B-3
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings and Plan Commission
approvals if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the B-3 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
and Plan Commission approvals if required.
A.
The Sarah Estates Planned Development consists of 26 single-family
parcels and one outlot on approximately 16.4 acres. The development
is located off of the north side of Woods Road between Lannon Drive
and Bay Lane Drive. The one outlot is for the stormwater management
of the subdivision. The development was constructed in one phase and
is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use reduced lot sizes and widths on a few
of the lots provided that the net density is maintained within the
boundaries of the final plat without specific compliance with the
underlying zoning district regulations that would otherwise be applicable
to each lot. The PD did not change any other requirements of the underlying
zoning district.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved
with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council
outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution
No. 018-2001.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 3-13-2001 per Ordinance No.
1058.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 2-20-2001 per Resolution
No. 018-2001.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-13-2001 per Resolution
No. 055-2001.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Big Muskego Estates Planned Development consists of approximately
92 acres containing 54 single-family parcels and three outlots. The
development was made of one plat and is generally located off of the
east side of Durham Road between Hi View Drive and North Cape Road.
The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by City
sewer and water. The three outlots for the development are for open
space preservation, stormwater management, and a City well site.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and
widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density
of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD did not change any other
requirements of the underlying zoning district.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Big Muskego Estates proposal.
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the
final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining
the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 12-18-2001 per Resolution
No. 187-2001.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-22-2002 per Ordinance No.
1090.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 5-6-2003 per Resolution
No. 048-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 6-24-2003 per Resolution
No. 150-2003.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Candlewood Village Planned Development contains approximately
48 acres with five parcels for commercial use and a few parcels for
multifamily residential use all generally located south of the intersection
of Moorland Road and Janesville Road. The commercial parcels must
receive Plan Commission building, site and operation plan (BSO) approval
and will be governed by the Moorland South Design Guide adopted by
the City. The residential use parcels consist of a condominium development
of 51 two-family structures (102 units) and one structure for community
use. The condo development received BSO approval from the City's Plan
Commission and is to follow specific design guidelines consistent
with the Moorland South Design Guide adopted by the City. The development
is constructed in multiple phases and is serviced by City sewer and
water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of B-3/RSA/PD General Business District and Attached Single-Family
Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District. The
planned development zoning was put in place to allow the developers
to use the amount of units disbursed throughout the developed area
while preserving the required density of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. The PD also allowed various structure placements for the residential
uses within the flexibility of the underlying code subject to Plan
Commission BSO and Common Council condominium plat approvals.
(2)
A developer's agreement and letter of credit were approved for
the development by the City's Common Council outlining the individual
guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution
No. 088-2002.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-23-2002 per Ordinance No.
1109.
(3)
Plan Commission CSM No. 1 approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution
No. 084-2002.
(4)
Common Council CSM No. 1 approval: 7-23-2002 per Resolution
No. 141-2002.
(5)
Plan Commission CSM No. 2 approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution
No. 085-2002.
(6)
Common Council CSM No. 2 approval: 7-23-2002 per Resolution
No. 142-2002.
(7)
Plan Commission CSM No. 3 approval: 6-18-2002 per Resolution
No. 086-2002.
(8)
Common Council CSM No. 3 approval: 7-23-2002 per Resolution
No. 143-2002.
(9)
Plan Commission CSM No. 4 approval: 5-20-2003 per Resolution
No. 059-2003.
(10)
Common Council CSM No. 4 approval: 5-27-2003 per Resolution
No. 123-2003.
(11)
Plan Commission condo plat approval: 5-20-2003 per Resolution
No. 054-2003.
(12)
Common Council condo plat approval: 5-20-2003 per Resolution
No. 124-2003.
C.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
A.
The Stonebridge Planned Development contains approximately 48 acres
with 43 single-family parcels and four outlots. The development is
located north of Highway 36 west of the Champions Village Subdivision.
The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by sewer
and water. The outlots in the subdivisions are for open space preservation
and stormwater management, and one outlot (Outlot 2) is to be reserved
for future development purposes.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and
widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density
of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed various requirements
of the underlying zoning, including front setbacks reduced to 30 feet,
all side offsets reduced to 10 feet, and rear offsets increased to
30 feet.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Stonebridge proposal.
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the
final plat for each development by the City's Common Council outlining
the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 1-7-2003 per Resolution No.
164-2002.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 1-28-2003 per Ordinance No.
1127.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 10-21-2003 per Resolution
No. 138-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 2-24-2004 per Resolution
No. 037-2004.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Settlement on Woods Planned Development consists of 59 single-family
parcels and eight outlots. The development is located off of Woods
Road just west of the Muskego High School property. The eight outlots
are for the protection of wetlands, stormwater management, and future
conservation land protection. The development was constructed in one
phase and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages on
a few of the lots while preserving the required density of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including reducing all front setbacks to
35 feet, reducing side offsets to 10 and 15 feet and enlarging rear
offsets to 30 feet.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved
with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council
outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-18-2003 per Resolution
No. 008-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 2-25-2003 per Ordinance No.
1131.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 2-18-2003 per Resolution
No. 008-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 3-11-2003 per Resolution
No. 045-2003.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Lindale Planned Development consists of approximately 14 acres
containing nine single-family units and 48 multifamily units (total
of 57 dwelling units). The development is generally located along
the south side of Martin Drive just north of the Janesville Road and
Martin Drive intersection. The development is constructed in two phases
consisting of a final plat for the Lindale Estates single-family subdivision
(nine single-family parcels and one outlot) and a condominium plat/building,
site and operation plan (BSO) for the Lindale Villas multifamily condominiums
(48 units in seven structures consisting of two four-unit buildings
and five eight-unit buildings). City sewer and water service the entire
development. The planned development was originally created as part
of a larger planned development that was approved in 2003. The larger
planned development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD
Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District,
RSA/PD Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District, and RSM/PD Multiple-Family District with a Planned
Development Overlay District. The Lindale PD is one of the areas reserved
for future RS-2/PD (Lindale Estates) and RSM/PD (Lindale Villas).
Each facet of the original planned development is incorporated into
a separate distinct PD upon final plat, condominium plat, or building,
site and operation plan approvals.
(1)
The planned development zoning was put in place to allow the
developers to use the calculations of the entire developed area in
allowing the proposed 57 units. The PD did not change any general
requirements of the underlying zoning and all lots follow the requirements
of the City's RS-2 Suburban Residence District.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential and multiple-family residential development consistent
with the Lindale proposal. A developer's agreement and letter of credit
were approved with the final plat for the development by the City's
Common Council outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-17-2003 per Resolution
No. 065-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-8-2003 per Ordinance No.
1144.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 10-1-2003 per Resolution
No. 137-2003.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 12-9-2003 per Resolution
No. 263-2003.
(5)
Plan Commission multifamily BSO approval: 8-3-2004 per Resolution
No. 048a-2004.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right.
E.
Permitted accessory uses.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant.
(1)
Any conditional use permitted in the RCE District (for the single-family
uses) subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
(2)
Any conditional use permitted in the RM-1 District (for the
multifamily uses) subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial
change hearings if required.
A.
The Forest Glen Planned Development consists of approximately 20
acres containing 27 single-family parcels. The development is generally
located north of the Janesville Road and Bay Lane Drive intersection.
The development is constructed in one phase and is serviced by City
sewer and water. The final plat of Forest Glen encompassed five outlots.
One outlot was dedicated to the City for future conservation protection,
three outlots are for drainage facilities, and one outlot is reserved
for future multifamily development.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a
larger planned development that was approved in 2003. The larger planned
development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban
Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, RSA/PD
Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District, and RSM/PD Multiple-Family District with a Planned
Development Overlay District. The Forest Glen PD is the area that
was reserved for future RS-2/PD. Each facet of the original planned
development is incorporated into a separate distinct PD upon final
plat, condominium plat, or building, site and operation plan approvals.
(2)
The Forest Glen planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use the reduced lot square footages and
widths on a few of the lots while preserving the required density
of the City's Comprehensive Plan. (The density of the Forest Glen
development is derived from the amount of single-family units allowed
divided by the sum of the square footages of the 27 single-family
parcels and Outlots 2 and 3.) The PD did not change any general requirements
of the underlying zoning and all lots follow the requirements of the
City's RS-2 Suburban Residence District.
(3)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
residential development consistent with the Forest Glen proposal.
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved with the
final plat for the development by the City's Common Council outlining
the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-17-2003 per Resolution
No. 065-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-8-2003 per Ordinance No.
1144.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 3-15-2005 per Resolution
No. 040-2005.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 5-24-2005 per Resolution
No. 101-2005.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if
required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial
change hearings if required.
[Amended 6-17-2020 by Ord. No. 1446]
A.
The Basse Planned Development consists of approximately 17.5 acres.
The development is located along the north side of Janesville Road
between Martin Drive to the east and Bay Lane Drive to the west. The
area is currently undeveloped although is platted for future multifamily
development as part of a planned development district.
(1)
The planned development was originally created as part of a
larger planned development that was approved in 2003. The larger planned
development reserved future planned development areas as RS-2/PD Suburban
Residence District with a Planned Development Overlay District, RSA/PD
Attached Single-Family Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District, and RSM/PD Multiple-Family District with a Planned
Development Overlay District. The Basse PD is the area that was reserved
for future RSM/PD. Each facet of the original planned development
is incorporated into a separate distinct PD upon final plat, condominium
plat, or building, site and operation plan (BSO) approvals. The Basse
PD will be established upon future approvals of a BSO and/or condominium
plat.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for multifamily
residential.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 6-17-2003 per Resolution
No. 065-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-8-2003 per Ordinance No.
1144.
(3)
Plan Commission Forest Glen final plat approval: 3-15-2005 per
Resolution No. 040-2005.
(4)
Common Council Forest Glen final plat approval: 5-24-2005 per
Resolution No. 101-2005.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-1 District
subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings if
required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-1
District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-1 District subject to BSO approvals and zoning substantial
change hearings if required.
A.
The Kenwood Place Planned Development consists of 37 single-family
parcels and one outlot on approximately 26.4 acres. The development
is located off of the east side of Hillendale Drive between Tans Drive
and Racine Avenue. The one outlot is for the stormwater management
of the subdivision. The development was constructed in one phase and
is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-3/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use reduced widths on a few of the lots.
The PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning,
including having side offsets be 15 feet and rear offsets be 20 feet
for all lots and having reduced front setbacks for Lots 36 and 37
to be 30 feet.
(2)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved
with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council
outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 2-3-2004 per Resolution No.
166-2003.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 2-10-2004 per Ordinance No.
1160.
(3)
Plan Commission final plat approval: 6-1-2004 per Resolution
No. 060-2004.
(4)
Common Council final plat approval: 1-25-2005 per Resolution
No. 024-2005.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The St. Andrew's Village Condominium Planned Development consists
of 48 dwelling units in 24 structures, each being a side-by-side duplex
with a variety of options for facades. The development is located
on the south side of Ryan Road along the Muskego Lake Country Club.
The condo project is to be constructed in three phases with the first
phase consisting of 26 units, the second phase of eight units, and
the third phase of six units.
(1)
The structures all have the option to be one or two stories
and the owners will chose the layout at the time of sale. The structures
are constructed with strict architectural detailing consistent with
the General Design Guide. Each structure will be constructed of running
bond brick, cedar trim, hardi-plank siding, and thirty-year dimensional
shingles, and elements such as soldier courses, stone sills, and tempered
glass are used. Each condominium unit is provided with four off-street
parking spaces and is serviced by private drives maintained by the
St. Andrew's Homeowners' Association.
(2)
The 2010 Comprehensive Plan depicts the area for single-family
attached dwelling unit development consistent with the St. Andrew's
Village proposal. The adopted Parks and Conservation Plan depicts
wetlands and a navigable stream on the property to be a medium value
management priority and this area is preserved as part of the condo
plat. Landscape plans are a part of the building, site and operation
plan for each condo unit and street tree plans are also included for
the development. The condominiums will be served by municipal sanitary
sewer and water service and the project is subject to developer's
agreements executed by the City and petitioner to address the construction
of public and private improvements.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-18-2004 per Resolution
No. 052-2004.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-25-2004 per Ordinance No.
1171.
(3)
Plan Commission BSO/condo plat approval: 5-18-2004 per Resolution
No. 051-2004.
(4)
Common Council condo plat approval: 8-10-2004 per Resolution
No. 132-2004.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RM-2 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RM-2
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RM-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The InPro Planned Development consists of approximately 10 acres
and is generally located in the Muskego Industrial Park on the north
side of Apollo Drive between Mercury Drive and Racine Avenue. The
planned development was originally created under the past zoning of
I-1/PD General Industrial District with a Planned Development Overlay
District. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
a reduced setback of 25 feet to the addition of the existing InPro
structure. The PD did not change any other general requirements of
the underlying zoning, so all lots follow the requirements of the
City's I-1 General Industrial Zoning District. A building, site and
operation plan (BSO) was approved by the City's Plan Commission.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the M-2 District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the M-2
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the M-2 District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Woodland Creek Estates Planned Development consists of 76 single-family
parcels and eight outlots on approximately 72 acres. The development
is located off of the west side of Racine Avenue just south of the
Muskego High School property. The development was constructed in two
phases [Woodland Creek Estates (60 parcels) and Woodland Creek Estates
Addition No. 1 (16 parcels)] and is serviced by City sewer and water.
(1)
Outlots within the development are reserved for stormwater management,
open space preservation, and a sewer utility station. The main outlot
in the Woodland Creek Estates Addition No. 1 phase was dedicated to
the City to be part of the Engel Conservation Lands found adjacent
to the site. The developers also reserved an easement for public access
to the conservation site.
(2)
The planned development was originally created under the zoning
of RS-2/PD Suburban Residence District with a Planned Development
Overlay District. The planned development zoning was put in place
to allow the developers to use reduced lot sizes to a minimum of 18,000
square feet and 100 feet in width. The PD also changed a few of the
requirements of the underlying zoning, including having front setbacks
be 35 feet and side offsets be 10 feet on one side and 15 feet on
all other sides.
(3)
A subdivider's agreement and letter of credit were approved
with the final plat for the development by the City's Common Council
outlining the individual guarantees.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers:
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 7-20-2004 per Resolution
No. 062-2004.
(2)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 5-3-2005 per Resolution No.
046-2005.
(3)
Common Council rezoning approval: 7-27-2004 per Ordinance No.
1174.
(4)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-24-2005 per Ordinance No.
1190.
(5)
Plan Commission final plat approvals: 2-21-2006 per Resolution
No. 015-2006 and Resolution No. 016-2006.
(6)
Common Council final plat approvals: 5-9-2006 per Resolution
No. 099-2006.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
A.
The Belle Chasse Planned Development consists of approximately 128
single-family parcels on approximately 107 acres. The development
is located off of the west and east side of Durham Drive just south
of McShane Drive. The development is to be constructed in three phases
and is serviced by City sewer and water. Outlots within the development
are reserved for stormwater management, open space preservation, and
a sewer utility station. The planned development is created under
the auspices of the RS-2 Suburban Residence Zoning District as a planned
development. The planned development zoning was put in place to allow
the developers to use reduced lot sizes to a minimum of 18,000 square
feet and 100 feet in width. The PD also changed a few of the requirements
of the underlying zoning, including having setbacks on corner lots
be 30 feet on one front setback and 40 feet on the other front setback.
A separate subdivider's agreement, letter of credit, and final plat
are approved for each individual phase of the development by the City's
Common Council.
B.
Dates of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 3-7-2006 per Resolution No.
003a-2006.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 5-9-2006 per Ordinance No.
1213.
(3)
Common Council Phase 1 agreement approvals: 8-14-2007 per Resolution
No. 166-2007.
(4)
Plan Commission Phase 1 final plat approvals: 2-5-2008 per Resolution
No. 003-2008.
(5)
Common Council Phase 1 final plat approvals: 2-12-2008 per Resolution
No. 039-2008.
C.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
[Added 5-21-2015 by Ord.
No. 1396]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not
given its final approval for this development. Once all conditions
are met and approval is given, Attachment A of Ordinance No. 1396
will be included in this section. Ordinance No. 1396 is on file at
the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
[Added 12-8-2015 by Res.
No. 125-2015]
A.
The
Aster Hills Estates Planned Development consists of 53 single-family
parcels on approximately 63.5 acres. The development is located off
of the west side of North Cape Road just south of Durham Drive. The
development is to be constructed in one phase and is serviced by City
sewer and water. Outlots within the development are reserved for stormwater
management, open space preservation, and for a future City park. The
planned development is created under the auspices of the RS-2 Suburban
Residence Zoning District as a planned development. The planned development
zoning was put in place to allow the developers to cluster lots while
preserving a substantial outlot for City preservation and park purposes.
Lot sizes all are 23,000+ square and at least 110 feet in width. The
PD also changed a few of the requirements of the underlying zoning,
including having setbacks on lots be 30 feet and side setbacks of
15 feet unless noted differently on the final plat.
B.
Dates
of adoption and ordinance/resolution numbers.
(1)
Plan Commission rezoning approval: 10-7-2014 per Resolution
No. 054-2014.
(2)
Common Council rezoning approval: 10-14-2014 per Ordinance No.
1387.
(3)
Common Council agreement approvals: 5-26-2015 per Resolution
No. 056-2015.
(4)
Plan Commission final plat approvals: 11-3-2015 per Resolution
No. 054-2015.
(5)
Common Council final plat approvals: 12-8-2015 per Resolution
No. 120-2015.
C.
Basic regulations.
(2)
Density. Dwelling units per acre: 0.83.
(3)
Building location.
(a)
Minimum setback: 30 feet.
(b)
Side yard: 15 feet.
(c)
Rear yard: 25 feet. Rear setbacks are 25 feet with the exception
of lots backing up to Durham Drive, Priegel Drive, or North Cape Road
where the rear setback is 40 feet. Wetland setbacks of 15 feet or
50 feet (per the plat) affect all setbacks.
(5)
Open space. Minimum open space per residential dwelling unit:
15,000 square feet.
D.
Permitted uses by right. Any use as permitted in the RCE District
subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
E.
Permitted accessory uses. Any accessory use permitted in the RCE
District subject to zoning substantial change hearings if required.
F.
Permitted uses by conditional grant. Any conditional use permitted
in the RCE District subject to zoning substantial change hearings
if required.
[Added 6-2-2016 by Ord.
No. 1406]
A.
The
Parkland Towne Center Planned Development contains approximately 10.5
acres of mixed-use development along Janesville Road to the south
and Lannon Road to the west.
(1)
The development will generally contain the following:
(a)
Approximately 53,500 square feet of commercial buildings generally
consisting of a structure of 30,000 square feet, a structure of 12,000
square feet, a structure of 7,500 square feet, and a structure of
4,000 square feet.
(b)
Three multifamily structures with 30 units apiece, each structure
to total four stories and be approximately 21,600 square feet each
in size.
(2)
All commercial and multifamily residential uses as part of the Parkland
Towne Center are subject to Plan Commission building, site, and operation
plan and/or conditional use grant approval following the planned development
zoning approval.
(3)
The Planned Development District is approved in order to allow the
below characteristics for the proposed mixed-use development:
(a)
That the development is conceptually developed per the submittal
found in the approvals referenced below, subject to future City approvals
of civil plans, BSOs, CSM and other approvals.
(b)
The multifamily buildings not to exceed 43 feet nine inches as measured
by code.
(c)
The multifamily buildings to have up to 30 units in any one structure.
(d)
Commercial and residential buildings on the site to have varying
setbacks, offsets, floor area ratios, and open space ratios.
(e)
Allow the residential density to exist as 5,000 square feet per unit
as per the RM-1 Zoning District.
(f)
Lot lines to cross between developments including allowance of landlocked
parcels subject to easements.
(g)
Paving, parking space, and accessways to cross property lines throughout
the development.
(h)
That the approval involves the conceptual site plan approved under
Plan Commission Resolution No. 031-2016 which shows a forty-foot offset
for Apartment Building No. 3 on the west side.
C.
[Added 10-20-2016 by Ord. No. 1408]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not
given its final approval for this development code text. Once all
conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of
the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1408 is on file
at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
[Added 12-19-2018 by Ord. No. 1425]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not
given its final approval for this development code text. Once all
conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of
the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1425 is on file
at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
[Added 11-20-2019 by Ord. No. 1437]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not
given its final approval for this development code text. Once all
conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of
the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1437 is on file
at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
[Added 8-5-2020 by Ord. No. 1447]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not
given its final approval for this development code text. Once all
conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of
the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1447 is on file
at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
[Added 5-19-2021 by Ord. No. 1457]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not
given its final approval for this development code text. Once all
conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of
the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1457 is on file
at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
[Added 8-17-2021 by Ord. No. 1461]
(Note: At the time of publication of the Code the City had not
given its final approval for this development code text. Once all
conditions are met and approval is given, complete text details of
the planned development will be added. Ordinance No. 1461 is on file
at the office of the City Clerk-Treasurer.)
