The Floodplain Administrator shall request comments on variance
applications from MDE (NFIP State Coordinator) and shall provide such
comments to the Directors. In considering variance applications, the
Directors shall consider and make findings of fact on all evaluations,
all relevant factors, requirements specified in other sections of
these provisions and the following factors:
A. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury
of others.
B. The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage.
C. The susceptibility of the proposed development and its contents (if
applicable) to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual
owner.
D. The importance of the services to the community provided by the proposed
development.
E. The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which
are not subject to, or are subject to less, flooding or erosion damage.
F. The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable,
or if the facility is a functionally dependent use.
G. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated
development.
H. The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and
Hazard Mitigation Plan for that area.
I. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for passenger
vehicles and emergency vehicles.
J. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment
transport of the floodwaters and the effects of wave action, if applicable,
expected at the site.
K. The costs of providing government services during and after flood
conditions, including maintenance and repair of public utilities and
facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems, and streets
and bridges.
L. The comments provided by MDE (NFIP State Coordinator).
The Directors shall make an affirmative decision on a variance
request only upon:
A. A showing of good and sufficient cause. Good and sufficient cause
deals solely with the physical characteristics of the property and
cannot be based on the character of the improvement, the personal
characteristics of the owner/inhabitants or local provision that regulate
standards other than health and public safety.
B. A determination that failure to grant the variance would result in
exceptional hardship due to the physical characteristics of the property.
Increased cost or inconvenience of meeting the requirements of these
regulations does not constitute an exceptional hardship to the applicant.
C. A determination that the granting of a variance for development within
any designated floodway, or flood hazard area with base flood elevations
but no designated floodway, will not result in increased flood heights
beyond that which is allowed in these provisions.
D. A determination that the granting of a variance will not result in
additional threats to public safety; extraordinary public expense,
nuisances, fraud or victimization of the public, or conflict with
existing local laws.
E. A determination that the building, structure or other development
is protected by methods to minimize flood damages.
F. A determination that the variance is the minimum necessary to afford
relief, considering the flood hazard.