A.
General. It is recognized that all possible uses and variations of
uses that might arise cannot reasonably be listed or categorized.
If a proposed use resembles identified uses in terms of intensity
and character, and is consistent with the purpose of this chapter
and the applicable zoning district, it shall be classified as such
identified use and shall be subject to the regulations for the use
it most nearly resembles.
B.
Interpretation from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Code Enforcement
Officer shall have the authority to request an interpretation from
the Zoning Board of Appeals to assist his or her interpretation of
a provision of this chapter.
C.
Limitations on making interpretations. The Code Enforcement Officer
and the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be permitted to make interpretations
in any manner it deems fit; however, such Officer and Board shall
not have the authority to alter or change this chapter or allow a
use that which would be inconsistent with the requirements of this
chapter; provided, however, that in interpreting and applying the
provisions of this chapter, the requirements shall be deemed to be
the spirit and intent of this chapter and do not constitute the granting
of a special privilege.
