This article shall be known and cited as the “Glenn Heights
Roadway Impact Fees Article.”
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
This article is intended to assure the provision of adequate
roadway facilities to serve new development in the city by requiring
each development to pay its share of the costs of such improvements
necessitated by and attributable to such new development.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
This article is adopted pursuant to Texas Local Government Code
chapter 395 and the city charter. The provisions of this article shall
not be construed to limit the power of the city to utilize all powers
and procedures authorized under chapter 395, or other methods authorized
under state law or pursuant to other city powers to accomplish the
purposes set forth herein, either in substitution or in conjunction
with this article. Guidelines may be developed by ordinance, resolution,
or otherwise to implement and administer this article.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
The determination of the amount of the maximum impact fee
per service unit which can be imposed on new development pursuant
to this article. The amount of the impact fee per service unit is
a measure of the traffic impact on system facilities created by the
new development.
A roadway facility with a life expectancy of three (3) or
more years, to be owned and operated by or on behalf of the city.
Capital improvement applies to a newly constructed roadway facility
or to the expansion of an existing roadway facility.
The amount of the reduction of an impact fee arising from
payments made for a capital improvement included in the Roadway Improvements
Plan and made prior to the effective date of this article (September
16, 2003).
The point at which the applicant has complied with all conditions
of approval and the plat has been released for filing with Dallas
or Ellis County, whichever may be applicable.
The point at which the applicant has complied with all conditions
precedent to recording an approved final plat in Dallas or Ellis County,
whichever may be applicable, including any infrastructure or other
improvements required by the finance or any other ordinance.
A roadway facilities fee.
The projections of population and employment growth and associated
changes in land uses, densities and intensities adopted by the city,
as may be amended from time to time, upon which the roadway improvement
plan is based.
A project involving the construction, reconstruction, redevelopment,
conversion, structural alteration, relocation, or enlargement of any
structure, or any use or extension of land, which has the effect of
increasing the requirements for capital improvements, measured by
the number of service units to be generated by such activity, and
which requires either the approval and filing with Dallas or Ellis
County, whichever may be applicable, of a plat pursuant to the city’s
subdivision regulations or the issuance of a building permit.
The amount of the reduction of an impact fee designed to
fairly reflect the value of system facilities or other capital improvements
pursuant to rules herein established or council-approved administrative
guidelines, provided by a developer pursuant to the city’s subdivision
regulations or requirements.
Any freeway, expressway, principal or minor arterial or collector
roadways designated in the city’s adopted thoroughfare plan,
as may be amended from time to time. Roadway does not include any
roadway designated as a numbered highway on the official federal or
state highway system, but may include the city’s share of costs
for roadways and associated improvements designated on the federal
or state highway system, including matching funds and costs related
to utility line relocation and the establishment of curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, drainage appurtenances, and rights-of-way.
An improvement or appurtenance to a roadway which includes,
but is not limited to, rights-of-way, whether conveyed by deed or
easement; intersection improvements; traffic signals; turn lanes;
drainage facilities associated with the roadway; street lighting or
curbs. Roadway facility also includes any improvement or appurtenance
to an intersection with a roadway officially enumerated in the federal
or state highway system. Roadway facility excludes those improvements
or appurtenances to a roadway which are site-related facilities.
A fee imposed on new development by the city pursuant to
this article in order to fund or recoup the costs of capital improvements
necessitated by and attributable to such new development. Roadway
facilities fees do not include the dedication of rights-of-way or
easements for such facilities or the construction of such improvements.
Roadway facilities fees also do not include road escrow payments for
site-related facilities imposed under facility agreements in existence
on the effective date of this article (September 16, 2003).
The adopted plan, as may be amended from time to time, which
identifies the capital improvements and their costs for each roadway
benefit area, which are necessitated by and which are attributable
to new development within the benefit area, for a period not to exceed
10 years, which are to be financed in whole or in part through the
imposition of road facilities fees pursuant to this article.
The geographic area within which roadway facilities fees
for capital improvements will be collected for new development occurring
within such area, and within which fees so collected will be expended
for those capital improvements identified in the roadway improvements
plan to be located within the roadway benefits area. Roadway service
area does not include any land outside the city limits and shall not
exceed six (6) miles.
To reimburse the city for capital improvements which the
city has previously installed or caused to be installed.
A vehicle mile in the p.m. peak hour of traffic, as set forth
in the equivalency table contained at page III-14 of the roadway capital
improvements plan, as maintained on file in the office of the city
secretary, which serves as the standardized measure of consumption
or use of roadway facilities attributable to a new development.
The amount of a capacity created by contribution of a capital
improvement in behalf of a new development, expressed in vehicle miles.
A lot platted to accommodate a single-family or duplex dwelling
unit, as authorized under the city’s zoning regulations.
An improvement or facility which is for the primary use or
benefit of a new development and/or which is for the primary purpose
of safe and adequate provision of roadway facilities to serve the
new development, and which is not included in the roadway improvements
plan and for which the developer or property owner is solely responsible
under subdivision and other applicable regulations.
A capital improvement which is designated in the roadway
improvements plan and which is not a site-related facility. System
facilities may include a capital improvement which is located offsite,
within, or on the perimeter of the development site.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
The provisions of this article apply to all new developments
within the corporate boundaries of the city. The provisions of this
article apply uniformly within each roadway benefit area.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
Maximum impact fees per service unit for each roadway benefit area
shall be as set forth in schedule 1, attached to Ordinance 765-03
and made a part of this article by reference.
(b)
The impact fee per service unit which is to be paid by each new development
within a roadway benefit area shall be as set forth in schedule 2
attached to Ordinance 765-03 and made a part of this article by reference.
(c)
Impact fee schedules 1 and 2 may be amended from time to time by
ordinance.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
Assessment of the impact fee for any new development shall be made
as follows:
(1)
For land which is unplatted at the time of application for a building
permit, or for a new development which received final plat approval
prior to or on the effective date of this article (September 16, 2003)
and for which no replatting is necessary pursuant to the city’s
subdivision regulations prior to development, assessment of impact
fees shall occur at the time application is made for the building
permit, and shall be the amount of the maximum impact fee per service
unit as set forth in schedule 1 then in effect.
(2)
For a new development which is submitted for approval pursuant to
the city’s subdivision regulations after the effective date
of this article (September 16, 2003), or for which replatting results
in an increase in the number of service units after such date, assessment
of impact fees shall be at the time of final plat recordation, and
shall be the amount of the maximum impact fee per service unit as
set forth in schedule 1 then in effect.
(b)
Following assessment of the impact fee pursuant to subsection (a), the amount of the impact fee assessed per service unit for that development cannot be increased, unless the owner proposes to change the approved development by the submission of a new application for final plat approval, in which case new assessment shall occur at the schedule 1 rate then in effect.
(c)
Following the vacating of any plat or submittal of any replat, a new assessment must be made in accordance with subsection (a)(2).
(d)
Approval of an amending plat pursuant to V.T.C.S., Local Government
Code, section 212.016, is not subject to reassessment for an impact
fee.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
For all new developments, impact fees shall be collected at the time
of application for a building permit. The impact fees to be paid and
collected are listed in schedule 2. The city may enter into an agreement
with a developer for a different time and manner of payment of impact
fees, in which case the agreement shall determine the time and manner
of payment.
(b)
The city shall compute the impact fees for the new development in
the following manner:
(1)
The number of service units attributable to the new development first shall be determined by using the equivalency table contained at page III-14 of the roadway capital improvements plan, attached to Ordinance 765-03 and incorporated by reference herein as exhibit B. The number of service units attributable to the new development shall be reduced by any allowable offsets or credits for roadway facilities, by determining the number of service unit equivalents resulting from the offset or credit and subtracting such number from the total number of service units for the project, in the manner provided in section 10.03.009.
(2)
The number of development units shall be determined by dividing the
net number of service units by the number of service units per development
unit shown on the equivalency table, as contained on page III-14 of
the roadway capital improvements plan, as maintained on file in the
office of the city secretary.
(3)
The amount of impact fees to be collected shall be determined by
multiplying the number of development units for the project by the
impact fee per development unit for the roadway benefit area using
schedule 2.
(4)
For single-family and duplex residential developments, the total
amount of the impact fees for the new development shall be calculated
at time of application of a building permit. For other residential
and all nonresidential developments, the total amount of the impact
fees for the new development shall be calculated after submittal of
an application for a building permit and attached to the site plan
file or plat file.
(c)
If the building permit for which an impact fee has been paid has
expired, and a new application is thereafter filed, the impact fees
shall be computed using schedule 2 then in effect, with credits for
previous payment of fees being applied against the new fees due.
(d)
For a new development which is unplatted at the time of application
for a building permit, and for which no replatting is necessary pursuant
to the city’s subdivision regulations prior to development,
collection of impact fees shall occur at the time application is made
for the building permit, and shall be the amount of the impact fee
per service unit, as set forth in schedule 2 then in effect.
(e)
Whenever the property owner proposes to increase the number of service
units for a development, the additional impact fees collected for
such new service units shall be determined by using schedule 2 then
in effect, and such additional fee shall be collected at the times
prescribed by this section.
(f)
For a single-family residential lot of record existing on June 20,
1987, for which no replatting is necessary pursuant to the city’s
subdivision regulations prior to development, collection of impact
fees shall be pursuant to schedule 2, and such fees shall be collected
at the time of application for a building permit.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
The city shall offset the reasonable value of any system facility
which has been dedicated to and has been accepted by the city, or
credit the amount of any monetary contribution to such facility, against
the amount of the roadway impact fees due, in accordance with the
rules set forth in this section. The city may agree to offset the
reasonable value of any other capital improvement which is not on
the roadway improvements plan, but which is on the city’s adopted
thoroughfare plan. The value of an offset or credit may be stated
in dollars or service units.
(b)
This subsection applies only to an offset or credit associated with a capital improvement contributed to the city after the effective date of this article (September 16, 2003). Offsets or credits associated with a capital improvement contributed to the city prior to the effective date of this article are addressed in subsection (c).
(1)
For purposes of this subsection (b), an offset or credit associated with a capital improvement contributed to the city after the effective date of this article is created at the time that the city accepts the system facility or other capital improvement for dedication, or enters into a binding facilities agreement for the facility pursuant to the city’s subdivision regulations.
(2)
At the time the offset or credit is created, if no offset agreement
exists or the existing agreement does not contain the terms identified
herein on such date, the developer shall apply for an offset agreement,
and the agreement thereafter shall be enforced in accordance with
the following terms, providing:
(A)
Identification of the plat with which the offset or credit is to
be associated, with the exception of school districts;
(B)
The amount of the capacity created by the capital improvement, expressed
in service units equivalents;
(C)
A provision stating that the offset or credit may be used to reduce
impact fees imposed on new developments contained within the land
subject to the associated plat after the effective date of the agreement;
(D)
A provision that the amount of the offset or credit shall be determined
by estimating the number of service unit equivalents of capacity supplied
by the capital improvement, reduced by (1) the number of service units
developed within the plat since the contribution of the roadway facility,
using the land use equivalency table; by (2) the amount of the city’s
participation in the excess costs of the facility (expressed in equivalent
service units) and by (3) the amount of any payments received from
other new developments utilizing the facility (expressed in equivalent
service units);
(E)
A provision for reimbursement of any unused offsets or credits consistent with subsection (b)(4); and
(F)
A provision stating that the city may elect to buy back outstanding offsets or credits in accordance with subsection (f).
The developer may assign the offset agreement with the city’s
consent, but in no event shall the offsets and credits provided for
in the agreement be transferred to any development not subject to
the plat associated with such offsets and credits with the exception
of school districts which may transfer the credits to any future development
by the school district.
(3)
The developer may petition the city council for offsets for contribution of a capital improvement, including road right-of-way, which is not identified in the roadway improvements plan, if the improvement will supply capacity to new developments other than to the development seeking the offset, at the time the facility is accepted by the city or a binding facilities agreement for the facility is executed pursuant to the city’s subdivision regulations. In no event, however, may offsets attributable to such facility be used to reduce impact fees until the roadway improvements plan has been amended to include all or a portion of the capital improvement. If the petition is granted, the terms shall be incorporated into an offset agreement as provided in subsection (b)(2). The agreement also shall provide that the amount of the offset shall not exceed the capacity of the capital improvement that is included in the roadway improvements plan.
(4)
As provided in the offset agreement required by subsection (b)(2), the developer may apply for reimbursement of excess offsets or credits following either completion of all development subject to the plat with which the offsets or credits are associated or after ten years following execution of the offset agreement. The following rules apply to such reimbursement, and shall be incorporated into the offset agreement:
(A)
The developer must apply for reimbursement within six months following
either (1) completion of all development subject to the plat with
which the offsets or credits are associated or (2) ten years after
the date of execution of the offset agreement.
(B)
The following terms shall be incorporated in the reimbursement agreement
and the agreement shall be enforced in accordance with such terms:
(i)
A provision stating that the amount to be reimbursed shall be
equal to the number of unused offsets (expressed as a number of service
units) multiplied by a fraction equal to the impact fee per service
unit to be collected, as set forth in schedule 2 in effect on the
date of execution of the offset agreement, divided by the maximum
impact fee per service unit, as set forth in schedule 1 in effect
on the date of execution of the offset agreement;
(ii)
A provision stating that the amount to be reimbursed may be
further equitably reduced, if fewer than fifty percent (50%) of the
number of service units in the plat with which the capital improvement
giving rise to the offset have been developed on the date of application
for reimbursement;
(iii)
A provision stating that repayment shall be made within five
(5) years from the date of execution of the reimbursement agreement,
from road facilities fees collected within the roadway benefit area,
subject to the availability of such funds;
(iv)
A provision that termination or reduction of the city’s
authority under state law to impose impact fees for roadway facilities
shall terminate or correspondingly reduce any obligation to make payments
under the offset agreement; and
(v)
A provision stating that, in converting the offsets from service
unit equivalents to a dollar value, the number of service unit equivalents
shall be multiplied by the value of a service unit expressed in dollars
using schedule 1 in effect at the time the offset agreement was executed.
(C)
Execution of a reimbursement agreement shall automatically terminate
any offsets or credits associated with a plat pursuant to an offset
agreement. Thereafter, new development within the area subject to
the plat shall pay roadway facilities fees in accordance with schedule
2 then in effect.
(c)
This subsection applies only to offsets or credits associated with
a capital improvement contributed to the city prior to the effective
date of this article (September 16, 2003), and for which no development
agreement exists providing for dedication or construction of system
facilities and for offsets or credits against impact fees in proportion
thereto. Any person who dedicated a system facility to the city or
financed such facility prior to the effective date of this article,
or any person who is subject to an impact fee for a new development
in a plat associated with the system facility, may create offsets
or credits for such facility by entering into an offset agreement
within two years of the effective date of this article. The agreement
shall be enforced in accordance with the following terms, providing:
(1)
Identification of the plat with which the offset or credit is to
be associated, with the exception of school districts;
(2)
The amount of the capacity created by the capital improvement, expressed
in service units equivalents;
(3)
A provision stating that the offset or credit may be used to reduce
impact fees imposed on new developments contained within the land
subject to the associated plat after the effective date of the agreement;
(4)
A provision stating that the amount of the offset or credit shall
be determined by estimating the number of service units of capacity
supplied by the system facility, reduced by (1) the number of service
units developed within the plat since the contribution of the roadway
facility, using the land use equivalency table; by (2) the amount
of the city’s participation in the excess costs of the facility
(expressed in equivalent service units) and by (3) the amount of any
payments received from other new developments utilizing the facility
(expressed in equivalent service units);
(5)
A provision stating that offsets or credits created pursuant to the
offset agreement shall expire at the time that development subject
to the associated plat is completed;
(6)
A provision stating that once the offset or credit has expired, no
reimbursement for unused offsets or credits shall be due;
(7)
A provision stating that, in converting offsets from service unit
equivalents to a dollar value, the number of service unit equivalents
shall be multiplied by the value of a service unit expressed in dollars
using schedule 1 in effect at the time the offset agreement was executed;
and
(8)
A provision stating that the city may elect to buy back outstanding offsets or credits in accordance with subsection (f).
The developer may assign the offset agreement with the city’s
consent, but in no event shall the offsets and credits provided for
in the agreement be transferred to any development not subject to
the plat associated with such offsets and credits, with the exception
of school districts.
(d)
All offsets and credits against roadway impact fees shall be subject
to the following limitations and shall be granted based on this article
and additional standards promulgated by the city council, which may
be adopted as council-approved administrative guidelines:
(1)
No offset or credit shall be given for the dedication of land or
easements for or the construction of site-related facilities.
(2)
No offset or credit shall exceed the documented and city-approved
costs to the developer of the capital improvement which was dedicated
to and accepted by the city, or the amount of the monetary contribution
actually made.
(3)
The costs or service unit equivalents used to calculate the offsets
shall not exceed those assumed for the specific capital improvement
included in the impact fees capital improvements plan or the actual
costs of that improvement, whichever is less.
(e)
Offsets or credits shall be associated with the approved preliminary
plat for the new development and shall apply to development of all
land subject to such plat, with the exception of school districts.
For new developments that are to be developed in phases, offsets or
credits may be created sequentially, and may be applied to any undeveloped
portions of the plat with which the offset or credit is associated.
The offset shall be expressed in service unit equivalents. The available
offset or credit associated with the plat shall be applied against
an impact fee in the following manner:
(1)
For single-family residential lots which have received final plat
approval, the offset or credit shall be applied to reduce the impact
fee equally for all such lots within the final plat at the time of
final plat recordation.
(2)
For all other types of new developments, the offset or credit shall
be applied to reduce the impact fee at the time of issuance of the
first building permit, and thereafter to all subsequently issued building
permits, for each new development within the associated plat, until
the offset or credit has been exhausted.
(f)
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section relating to
offsets and credits, the city in its sole discretion may choose to
acquire all or a portion of any outstanding offsets or credits associated
with a new development by giving the property owner sixty (60) days’
written notice of such intent and by tendering the dollar value of
such offsets or credits using schedule 1 in effect at the time the
applicable offset agreement was executed.
(g)
Notwithstanding any other provision of this article to the contrary,
for new developments subject to a development agreement predating
the effective date of this article (September 16, 2003), which agreement
provides for dedication or construction of system facilities and for
offsets or credits against roadway impact fees in proportion thereto,
offsets or credits shall apply to the amount of impact fees to be
collected for each service unit pursuant to schedule 2 then in effect
in accordance with the terms of such development agreement.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
The impact fees collected within each roadway benefit area may be used to finance, pay for or to recoup the costs of any roadway facility identified in the roadway improvements plan for the roadway benefit area, including the construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, land acquisition costs (including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney’s fees, and expert witness fees), and amounts designated in any reimbursement agreements executed pursuant to section 10.03.009.
(b)
Impact fees may be used to pay for the contract services of an independent
qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the
roadway improvements plan who is not an employee of the political
subdivision.
(c)
Impact fees also may be used to pay the principal sum and interest
and other finance costs on bonds, notes or other obligations issued
by or on behalf of the city to finance such capital improvement.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
The property owner or applicant for development may appeal the following
administrative decisions to the city council:
(1)
The applicability of an impact fee to the development;
(2)
The amount of the impact fee due;
(3)
The availability of, the amount of, or the expiration of an offset
or a credit;
(4)
The application of an offset or credit against an impact fee due;
(5)
The amount of the impact fee in proportion to the benefit received
by the new development; or
(6)
Amount of a refund due, if any.
(b)
The appellant shall state the basis for the appeal in writing with
particularity. The burden of proof shall be on the appellant to demonstrate
that the amount of the fee or the amount of the offset or credit was
not calculated according to the rules set forth in this article or
by administrative guideline. The appellant shall submit any traffic
study or other documents upon which he relies to the city with the
request for appeal.
(c)
The appellant must file a notice of appeal with the city secretary
within thirty (30) days following the decision. If the notice of appeal
is accompanied by a bond or other sufficient surety satisfactory to
the city attorney in an amount equal to the original determination
of the impact fee due, the development application may be processed
while the appeal is pending.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
Any impact fee or portion thereof collected pursuant to this article
which has not been expended within the applicable roadway benefit
area for an authorized purpose within ten (10) years from the date
of payment shall be refunded, upon application, to the record owner
of the property at the time the refund is paid or, if the impact fee
was paid by another governmental entity, to such governmental entity,
together with interest calculated from the date of collection to the
date of refund at the statutory rate as set forth in Texas Finance
Code section 302.002, or any successor statute. The application for
refund pursuant to this section shall be submitted in writing within
sixty (60) days after the expiration of the ten-year period for expenditure
of the fee. An impact fee shall be considered expended on a first-in,
first-out basis.
(b)
An impact fee collected pursuant to this article shall be considered expended if the total expenditures for capital improvements authorized in section 10.03.010 within the roadway benefit area within ten (10) years following the date of payment exceed the total fees collected for such improvements during such period.
(c)
If a refund is due pursuant to subsection (a) or (b), the city shall prorate the refund by dividing the difference between the amount of expenditures and the amount of the fees collected by the total number of service units assumed within the roadway benefit area for the period to determine the refund due per service unit. The refund to the record owner shall be calculated by multiplying the refund due per service unit by the number of service units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon that amount.
(d)
Upon completion of all the capital improvements identified in the
roadway improvements plan for the roadway benefit area, the city shall
recalculate the maximum impact fee per service unit using the actual
costs for the improvements or expansions. If the maximum impact fee
per service unit based on actual cost is less than the impact fee
per service unit paid, the city shall refund the difference, if such
difference exceeds the impact fee paid by more than ten percent (10%).
The refund to the record owner shall be calculated by multiplying
such difference by the number of service units for the development
for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon
that amount.
(e)
If the building permit for a new development for which an impact
fee has been paid has expired, and a modified or new application has
not been filed within six (6) months of such expiration, the city
shall, upon written application, refund the amount of the impact fee
to the applicant. The city may establish guidelines for refunding
of impact fees collected for which construction plans have been abandoned.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
Any person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of land upon which
an impact fee has been paid may petition the city council to determine
whether any duty required by this article has not been performed within
the time so prescribed. The petition shall be in writing and shall
state the nature of the unperformed duty and request that the act
be performed within sixty (60) days of the request. If the city council
determines that the duty is required pursuant to this article and
is late in being performed, it shall cause the duty to commence within
sixty (60) days of the date of the request and to continue until completion.
(b)
The city council may grant a variance or waiver from any requirement
of this article, upon written request by a developer or owner of property
subject to this article, following a public hearing, and only upon
finding that a strict application of such requirement would when regarded
as a whole result in confiscation of the property.
(c)
If the city council grants a variance or waiver to the amount of
the impact fee due for a new development under this section, it may
cause to be appropriated from other city funds the amount of the reduction
in the impact fee to the account for the roadway benefit area in which
the property is located.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
The Land Use Assumptions for Impact Fees, dated May 1, 2003, which
includes the city’s land use assumptions for roadway facilities,
is hereby adopted as the city’s land use assumptions for roadway
facilities and is hereby adopted as exhibit A, as maintained on file
in the office of the city secretary.
(b)
There is hereby established one roadway benefit area as depicted
in figure 3.1 on the city’s roadway capital improvements plan,
as maintained on file in the office of the city secretary.
(c)
The boundaries of the roadway benefit areas may be amended from time
to time, or new roadway benefit areas may be delineated.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
The roadway improvements plan for the city is hereby adopted as exhibit
B, as maintained on file in the office of the city secretary.
(b)
The roadway improvements plan may be amended from time to time.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
(a)
The maximum impact fees per development unit for roadway facilities
are hereby adopted and incorporated in schedule 1 attached to Ordinance
765-03 and made a part hereof by reference.
(b)
The impact fees per development unit for roadway facilities, which
are to be paid by each new development, are hereby adopted and incorporated
in schedule 2 attached to Ordinance 765-03 and made a part hereof
by reference.
(c)
The impact fees per service unit for roadway facilities may be amended
from time to time.
(Ordinance 765-03 adopted 9/16/03)
