A.
Applicability. The following procedures
shall apply to any zoning related plan or Application that is required
by the City and is submitted in accordance with this UDC.
B.
Determination of Completeness for
Zoning-Related Applications. Every required Application shall be subject
to a Determination of Completeness by the Responsible Official for
processing the Application.
1.
Acceptance Standard. The Application
shall only be accepted by the Responsible Official for processing
when it is accompanied by all documents required by, and prepared
in accordance with, the requirements of this UDC.
2.
Acceptance Procedures. A Determination
of Completeness of an Application shall be conducted in accordance
with the following procedures:
a.
A Determination of Completeness shall
be made by the Responsible Official not later than the tenth (10th)
business day, unless otherwise specified, after the Official Vesting
Date.
b.
If the submitted Application is incomplete,
the Applicant shall be notified in writing not later than the tenth
(10th) business days after the Official Vesting Date.
i.
Such notice shall be served by depositing
it in the U.S. Postal Service, or by electronic mail transmission,
before the tenth (10th) business day following submission of the Application.
ii. The notification shall
specify the documents or other information needed to complete the
Application, and shall state the date the Application will expire
(see D below) if the documents or other information are not provided
to the City.
c.
An Application shall be deemed complete
on the eleventh (11th) business day after the Application has been
received if notice is not served in accordance with D below.
d.
If the Application is determined
to be complete, the Application shall be processed as prescribed by
this UDC.
3.
Acceptance shall not Constitute Compliance.
A determination of completeness shall not constitute a determination
of compliance with the substantive requirements of this Section.
4.
Acceptance shall not Guarantee Approval.
It is not guaranteed that an accepted, complete Application will be
approved, if after the Application is deemed complete it is determined
that the Application does not comply with this UDC.
C.
Re-Submittal after Notification of
Incompleteness.
1.
If the Application is re-submitted
after a notification of incompleteness within the time allotted in
subsection D below, the Application shall be processed upon receipt
of the re-submittal.
2.
To the extent that the information
or documents submitted are not sufficient to enable the Decision-Maker
to apply the criteria for approval, the Application may be denied
on such grounds.
D.
Expiration of a Zoning-Related Application
due to Incompleteness. Pursuant to Texas Local Government Code Chapter
245, a zoning-related Application shall automatically expire at the
close of business on the forty-fifth (45th) calendar day after the
Application’s Official Vesting Date, if:
1.
The Applicant fails to provide documents
or other information necessary to comply with the City’s technical
requirements relating to the form and content of the permit Application;
and
2.
The City provides to the Applicant,
not later than the tenth (10th) business day after the date the Application
is filed, written notice that specifies the necessary documents or
other information, and the date the Application will expire if the
documents or other information is not provided; and
3.
The Applicant fails to provide the
specified documents or other information necessary to comply with
the City’s requirements relating to the Application within the
time provided in the notification.
E.
Texas Local Government Code Chapter
245 does not apply to Zoning Amendment Applications. Chapter 245 of
the Texas Local Government Code, as amended, shall not apply to a
Zoning Amendment Application or an ordinance establishing zoning since
neither is a permit under this UDC or Chapter 245.
F.
Denial of Zoning Applications.
1.
If any City official processes a
zoning Application prior to the Application being determined complete,
the Application shall then be deemed invalid and shall be grounds
for denial or revocation of such Application.
2.
A typographical error shall not constitute
an incomplete Application.
3.
The Applicant may be notified of
such denial or revocation for an incomplete zoning Application in
writing.
G.
Vesting Begins on the Official Vesting
Date. An Application shall be vested into the standards of the UDC
in effect at the time of the Application’s Official Vesting
Date.
H.
Submission of Previously Decided
Zoning Related Application. After the final decision on a specific
Application by the Decision-Maker, the same Application shall not
be submitted again until after six (6) months from the Decision-Maker’s
action.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
General.
1.
Procedural Steps.
a.
Proceedings to establish zoning may
be undertaken concurrently with annexation procedures (i.e., notified
at the same time, public hearings scheduled at the same time as annexation,
etc.).
b.
However, zoning approval and formal
adoption of the ordinance establishing zoning must occur after annexation
approval of the annexation ordinance have occurred, and as a separate
and distinct action by the City Council.
2.
Cases Where No Initial Zoning Action
Occurs Concurrently with Annexation.
a.
For any period of time following
official annexation by the City until an initial zoning action has
been officially adopted to zone the land, all zoning and development
regulations of the Agricultural (AG) District shall be adhered to
with respect to the development and use of the land.
B.
Necessary Studies for Initial Zoning.
1.
The City shall perform necessary
studies to officially adopt a zoning district for the newly annexed
land within one year from the effective date of the annexation ordinance.
2.
This zoning shall be deemed the initial
zoning of the newly annexed property.
C.
Initial Zoning of Newly Annexed Land.
1.
Within this one-year period, the
City Council shall instruct the Planning and Zoning Commission and
Director of Planning to study and make recommendations concerning
the use of land within said annexation to promote the general welfare
and to be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
2.
Upon receipt of such recommendations,
the City Council shall, after public hearings as required by law,
establish the initial district classification of said annexed property;
provided, however, that this shall not be construed as preventing
the City Council from holding public hearings prior to annexation
and establishing the district classification at the time of said annexation.
D.
Zoning Notice. The initial zoning
of a land parcel, whether by initiation of the landowner or by initiation
of the City, must meet the requirements for notification and public
hearings as set forth in 2.10.04. Public Hearings and Notification
Requirements and all other applicable State laws.
E.
Within an Annexed Area Where No Initial
Zoning Action has Occurred.
1.
No permit for the construction of
a building or use of land shall be issued by the Building Official
other than a permit which will allow the construction of a building
or use permitted in the Agricultural (AG) District until the Initial
Zoning of Newly Annexed Land has been approved by the City Council,
except as provided in 2 below.
2.
If plans and preparations for developing
a property for a use other than those specified in the Agricultural
(AG) District were already in progress prior to annexation of the
property into the City, in accordance with 2.11.05. Zoning Vested
Rights Petition, then the City Council may authorize construction
of the project by a majority vote.
a.
Application of this subsection is
contingent upon the following:
i.
The Applicant must be able to demonstrate
that plans and other preparations for developing the property commenced
prior to (i.e., were already in progress at the time of) annexation
into the City.
ii. Existing land uses shall
be allowed to continue in conformance with the vesting provisions
of Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code and 2.11.05. Zoning
Vested Rights Petition.
3.
In its deliberations concerning authorization
to proceed with construction of a project which meets the above criteria,
the City Council shall take into consideration the appropriate land
use for the area as shown on the City’s Future Land Use Plan.
a.
Upon approval by the City Council,
the Director of Planning shall notify the Building Official of such
approval.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Process Requirements.
1.
Zoning Amendments Require City Council
Approval. The City Council may, from time to time, amend, supplement
or change by ordinance, the boundaries of the districts (i.e., Zoning
Map Amendment (Rezoning)) or the regulations herein established (i.e.,
Zoning Text Amendment) as provided by the Statutes of the State of
Texas.
2.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Required for all Amendments. Before taking action on any proposed
amendment the City Council shall submit the same to the Planning and
Zoning Commission for its recommendation and report.
3.
Petitions Submitted to the City Council.
a.
Any person or corporation having
a proprietary interest in any property may petition the City Council
for a change or amendment to the zoning provisions of this UDC; or
b.
The Planning and Zoning Commission
may, on its own motion or on request from the City Council, study
and propose zoning changes and amendments for the City Council’s
consideration.
B.
Two Types of Zoning Amendments.
1.
Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning).
A Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) is a change or modification to the
boundaries of any zoning district within the City’s Zoning Map.
2.
Zoning Text Amendment. A Zoning Text
Amendment is the change of the text within Section 2. Zoning Regulations
and does not include change or modification to the boundaries of any
zoning districts.
C.
Rezoning within the Historic Overlay
(O-H) District.
1.
The Historic Preservation Commission
shall review and provide a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council for all Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
requests within the Historic Overlay (O-H) District. This recommendation
by the Historic Preservation Commission does not require a public
hearing.
2.
See 2.10.10. Designation of and Development
in Historic Overlay (O-H) District or of a Historic Landmark.
D.
Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation
Requires Public Hearing.
1.
The Planning and Zoning Commission
shall hold a public hearing on any Application for any amendment or
change prior to making its recommendation and report to the City Council.
2.
In the case of a Zoning Map Amendment
(Rezoning):
a.
Written notice of all public hearings
before the Planning and Zoning Commission on a proposed amendment
or change shall be sent to all owners of real property within two
hundred (200) feet of the property on which the change is requested.
i.
Such notice shall be given not less
than fifteen (15) calendar days before the date set for hearing by
posting such notice, properly addressed and postage paid, to each
taxpayer as the ownership appears on the last approved City tax roll
or County tax roll for the area affected.
b.
Consistency between a Zoning Map
Amendment (Rezoning) and the Comprehensive Plan shall be required.
c.
For selected zoning districts, each
rezoning Application shall be accompanied by a Site Plan (see 2.10.07.
B.1. Site Plan in association with a Specific Use Permit).
E.
Sign Posting for a Zoning Map Amendment
(Rezoning) Related to a Particular Property.
1.
At least fifteen (15) calendar days
prior to the public hearing by the Planning and Zoning Commission
on a proposed amendment to the zoning map, the Applicant shall cause
a sign, clearly visible to passersby, to be placed and maintained
on such property.
2.
The sign shall state that the property
is the subject of a rezoning Application.
3.
The Director of Planning shall furnish
and post the sign on the property proposed to be rezoned.
4.
The sign shall remain continuously
posted on the property until the City Council has conducted its public
hearing on the matter.
F.
Effect of Posted Sign Maintenance.
The continued maintenance of the sign due to theft, weather, or other
cause shall not be a condition precedent to the holding of a public
hearing, the adoption of any proposed zoning change, or any other
official action concerning such zoning map amendment.
G.
City Council Decision and Public
Hearing Required.
1.
A public hearing shall be held by
the City Council before adopting any proposed amendment.
2.
Notice of the time and place of the
hearing must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in
the City before the fifteenth (15th) calendar day before the date
of the hearing.
H.
Three-Fourths City Council Vote Required
for Protested Amendments.
1.
If a protest against a proposed amendment
consistent with 2 below has been filed with the City Secretary at
least twenty-four (24) hours including a regular City business day
before the date of the public hearings, then amendments shall not
become effective except by a three-fourths (3/4) vote of the governing
body.
2.
Two Types of Eligible Protesters:
a.
Interior Protesters. The property
owners, duly signed and acknowledged, of twenty (20) percent or more
of the lots or land area included within a proposed amendment boundary.
b.
Exterior Protesters. The property
owners, duly signed and acknowledged, of twenty (20) percent or more
of the lots or land area within a two hundred (200) foot radius of
the exterior boundary of the area included in a proposed amendment.
3.
Calculation Example. Assume that
the 200’ buffer surrounding the area subject to rezoning includes
10 acres. If an individual owns 2 acres within the buffer, his/her
protest would constitute twenty (20) percent.
Figure 49. Calculation for
Exterior Protestors
|
|
I.
Three-Fourths City Council Vote Required
for Planning and Zoning Commission Denial. If the Planning and Zoning
Commission has recommended denial of an Application for amendment,
a three-fourths (3/4) vote of City Council is required to approve
the Application.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Public Hearings. Public hearings
shall be conducted for each review body per plan or Application type
according to the following table.
Table 25. Review Bodies and
Associated Public Hearings
|
Application Type
|
City Council
|
Planning and Zoning Commission
|
Board of Adjustment
|
Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
|
Hearing
|
Hearing
|
|
Zoning Text Amendment
|
Hearing
|
Hearing
|
|
Planned Development (PD)
|
Hearing
|
Hearing
|
|
Specific Use Permit
|
Hearing
|
Hearing
|
|
Amortization of Nonconforming Uses
|
|
|
Hearing
|
Zoning Regulation Appeal
|
|
|
Hearing
|
Zoning Variance
|
|
|
Hearing
|
Zoning Special Exception
|
|
|
Hearing
|
Sign Regulation Administrative Appeal
|
|
Hearing
|
|
Sign Regulation Variance
|
|
Hearing
|
|
Sign Regulation Special Exception
|
|
Hearing
|
|
B.
Public Notices. Public notices shall
be required according to the following table.
Table 26. Required Public Notice
|
---|
Application Type
|
Sign Notice
|
Published Notice
|
Written Notice
|
Posted Notice
|
---|
Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
|
Required (P&Z/City Council)
|
Required (City Council)
|
Required (P&Z)
|
Required (P&Z/City Council)
|
Zoning Text Amendment
|
|
Required (City Council)
|
|
Required (City Council)
|
Planned Development (PD)
|
Required (P&Z/City Council)
|
Required (City Council)
|
Required (P&Z)
|
Required (P&Z/City Council)
|
Specific Use Permit
|
Required (P&Z/City Council)
|
Required (City Council)
|
Required (P&Z)
|
Required (P&Z/City Council)
|
Amortization of Nonconforming Uses
|
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Zoning Regulation Appeal
|
|
|
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Zoning Variance
|
|
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Zoning Special Exception
|
|
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Required (ZBA)
|
Sign Regulation Administrative Appeal
|
|
|
|
Required (P&Z)
|
Sign Regulation Variance
|
|
|
Required (P&Z)
|
Required (P&Z)
|
Sign Regulation Special Exception
|
|
|
Required (P&Z)
|
Required (P&Z)
|
C.
Types of Notice.
1.
Sign Notice Posted on Property.
a.
The Director of Planning shall maintain
an inventory of signs to fulfill the notification requirements listed
in Table 26. Required Public Notice (on page 166).
b.
The continued maintenance of the
sign shall not be a condition precedent to the holding of a public
hearing, the adoption of any proposed zoning change, or any other
official action concerning such amendment.
2.
Published Notice and Written Notice
of Public Hearing for Zoning Changes Involving Real Property.
a.
Published Notice. Notice of the public
hearing to occur before the City Council shall be accomplished by
publishing the purpose, date, time, and place of the public hearing
in the official newspaper of the City before the fifteenth (15th)
calendar day prior to the date of the public hearing.
b.
Written Notice for Protest (also
referred to as "Mailed Notice").
i.
Before the fifteenth (15th) calendar
day, written notice of the public hearing before the Planning and
Zoning Commission on a proposed change in a zoning classification
shall be sent to each owner, as indicated by the most recently approved
municipal tax roll, of real property within two hundred (200) feet
of the property on which the change in classification is proposed.
ii. Said written notice
shall be served by depositing the notice, postage paid, in the regular
United States mail.
iii. If written notice as
required is not sent before the fifteenth (15th) calendar day prior
to the date of the hearing, then the hearing must be delayed until
this notice requirement is met.
iv. Such notice shall include:
(a) Legal description of
the property and the street address or approximate location within
the City.
(b) Present zoning classification
of the property and the zoning sought by the Applicant. If not a rezoning,
then the nature or intent of the Application shall be described.
(c) The date, time, and
place of hearing.
(d) The web site that contains
the zoning map and information regarding the rezoning;
(e) The phone number where
questions may be answered; and
(f) Other information as
may be necessary to provide adequate and timely public notice.
c.
Written Notice for Courtesy Interest.
i.
It shall be the City’s policy
to provide written notification to properties located beyond the required
two hundred (200) foot notification area, but within four hundred
(400) feet of the property on which the change in classification is
proposed.
ii. Property owners within
the required two hundred (200) foot notification area will not receive
a courtesy notice.
iii. Property owners within
the courtesy area may be heard during the public hearing; however,
protests will not count as an toward the twenty (20) percent requirement
noted in 2.10.03. H Three-Fourths City Council Vote Required for Protested
Amendments.
iv. Failure to notify property
owners within this courtesy area will not preclude action on the zoning
amendment.
3.
"Published Notice" of Public Hearing
for Zoning Changes Involving Regulation Text.
a.
For requests involving proposed changes
to the text of the zoning regulations, notice of the City Council
public hearing shall be accomplished by publishing the purpose, date,
time, and place of the public hearing in the official newspaper of
the City before the fifteenth (15th) calendar day prior to the date
of the public hearing.
b.
Changes in the zoning text that do
not change zoning district boundaries (i.e., that do not involve specific
real property) do not require written notification to individual property
owners.
4.
Published Notice and Written Notice
of an Appeal of a City Administrative or Interpretative Decision to
the Board of Adjustment.
a.
For an Appeal of a City Administrative
or Interpretative Decision, the Board of Adjustment shall fix a reasonable
time for the hearing of an appeal, give the public notice by written
notice in the mail addressed to all owners of real property located
within two hundred (200) feet of the property on which the appeal
is made, and by publication of notice of such hearing in the City’s
official newspaper.
b.
Both the mailed and published notice
shall be given before the fifteenth (15th) calendar day prior to the
date for the hearing.
c.
At the hearing, any party may appear
in person or by Attorney or by agent.
5.
Additional Rules and Procedures Established.
a.
The City Council may, at its option,
establish additional rules and procedures for public notification
of proposed zoning changes and development proposals (e.g., required
plans, plats, etc.), which may include, but not be limited to, the
posting of a sign(s) on any property that is proposed for a zoning
change or development by the Applicant or its agent(s).
b.
The City Council may, by policy enacted
through a resolution, direct notice of a Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
beyond two hundred (200) feet. Failing to adhere to such notice does
not constitute a procedural violation and does not alter the protest
area.
c.
Knowledge of and adherence to such
rules and procedures, if so established by the City, shall be the
responsibility of the Applicant and shall be required as part of a
zoning change or development Application.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017; Ordinance 2022-16 adopted 6/21/2022)
No permit for the construction of
a building or buildings or fence, wall, or sign upon any tract or
plot shall be issued until the lot or tract is part of a plat of record,
approved by the City and filed in the Plat Records of Hays County,
Texas, and compliant with all development regulations.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Use. No building hereafter erected
or structurally altered, shall be used, occupied or changed in use
until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Building Official,
stating that the building or proposed use of the building or premises
complies with the building code, electrical code, plumbing code, and
the provisions of these and all other development regulations.
B.
Change in Use. A change in use shall
be construed to mean any change in the primary occupancy or type of
business.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Purpose. The purpose of the Site
Plan process is to establish a procedure for coordinating and verifying
improvements to properties. Through Site Plan review, zoning standards
and other applicable municipal standards or ordinances that may apply
to specific site development can be uniformly implemented by the City
for multiple-family and nonresidential development. This process is
intended to promote, among other items, the efficient and harmonious
use of land, safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation,
parking and loading, lighting, screening, open space, and landscaping.
B.
Site Plan Processing. Two different
types Site Plans exist, related to SUPs (1 below) and Building Permits
(2 below).
1.
Site Plan in association with a Specific
Use Permit An approved Site Plan is required as part of the Application
for a Specific Use Permit.
2.
Site Plan in association with a Building
Permit Application. An approved Site Plan is required as part of or
prior to the Application for a Building Permit for the following development
types:
a.
Nonresidential Development.
i.
All nonresidential development within
the City limits, except as provided in D below, require an approved
Site Plan.
ii. Parking lot development,
reconstruction, or reconfiguration of more than twenty (20) spaces
requires an approved Site Plan.
b.
Residential Development. Residential
buildings having more than four (4) dwelling units require an approved
Site Plan.
c.
Innovative Residential Development.
All Innovative Residential Developments require an approved Site Plan
(see 2.09.07.
d.
Planned Development (PD). All Planned
Development (PD) building permit Applications require an approved
Site Plan (see 2.10.08.).
3.
Effect. No Certificate of Occupancy
shall be issued unless all construction and development conform to
the Site Plan as approved by the City.
C.
Approval Process.
1.
Site Plan in association with a Specific
Use Permit. The approval of a Site Plan related to a rezoning Application
requires the following:
a.
Review by the Director of Planning,
b.
A recommended action by Planning
and Zoning Commission for the City Council’s consideration,
and
c.
Approval by the City Council.
2.
Site Plan in association with a Building
Permit Application. The approval of a Site Plan related to a Building
Permit or construction/development Application requires approval by
the Director of Planning. The Director of Planning shall be responsible
for ensuring that appropriate internal administrative review has occurred
(i.e., Fire Marshal, Building Official, etc.).
3.
Site Plan Process Overview. The purpose
of the Site Plan process is to:
a.
Ensure compliance with adopted City
development regulations and other applicable regulations that apply
to the property for which the City has enforcement responsibility;
b.
Promote safe, efficient and harmonious
use of land through application of City-adopted design standards and
guidelines;
c.
Promote the vision established by
the Comprehensive Plan;
d.
Ensure adequate public facilities
to serve development;
e.
Coordinate and document the design
of public and private improvements to be constructed;
f.
Prevent or mitigate adverse development
impacts, including overcrowding and congestion;
g.
Aid evaluation and coordination of
land subdivision, including the granting of easements, Right-of-Way,
development agreements and provision of surety;
h.
Identify and address environmental
concerns (floodplain, drainage, trees, topography, etc.); and
i.
Promote the public health, safety
and welfare.
D.
Exempted Development Types. The following
types of development are exempted from the requirements of this 2.10.07.
Site Plans:
2.
Residential dwellings with four (4)
or fewer units; and
3.
A Temporary Building as permitted
by 2.06.05. Use Chart.
E.
Submission of Site Plan Applications.
1.
Coordinating Official. Applications
for approval of plans required by this 2.10.07. Site Plans must be
submitted to the Director of Planning.
2.
Calendar of Official Processing Dates.
A calendar of official processing dates for items requiring Director
of Planning review, Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation,
and City Council approval pursuant to this 2.10.07. Site Plans shall
be published by the City thirty (30) calendar days prior to the beginning
of each calendar year.
3.
Late Application Processing Date.
All Applications required by this 2.10.07. Site Plans filed on a date
other than an official processing date shall be processed according
to the schedule established by the subsequent official processing
date appearing on the calendar after the filing date and after the
date of receipt of the Application.
4.
Other Regulations for Applications.
Applications are also governed by 2.10.01. Applicability, Completeness,
and Expiration.
F.
Fees, Forms, and Procedures.
1.
Schedule of Fees. The fees relating
to the Site Plan approval process shall be established by the Fee
Schedule.
2.
Delinquent Taxes and Noncompliance.
No Site Plan shall be approved for properties with delinquent City
taxes or other noncompliance issues.
3.
Procedures, Forms, and Standards.
The Director of Planning shall establish procedures, forms, and standards
with regard to the content, format and number of copies of information
constituting an Application for a Site Plan.
G.
Site Plan Application Procedure and
Requirements.
1.
Site Plan Pre-Application.
a.
Before preparing a Site Plan, the Applicant may meet with the Director of Planning to allow the Applicant to learn the general procedures for approval and to review the concept of the proposed development, if desired by Applicant. See Subsection
1.04. Pre-Application Meeting.
b.
No Application for a permit may be
submitted to or accepted for filing with the Director of Planning
during the meeting.
2.
Site Plan General Application. The
property owner or authorized agent shall file an Application for the
approval of a Site Plan. This Application shall include the information
listed on the Site Plan Application Form and Checklist, which shall
be created and maintained by the Director of Planning.
3.
Site Plan Additional Requirements.
The following plans shall be submitted with a Site Plan Application
and approval is necessary prior to final authorization for development:
c.
Traffic Impact Analysis, if applicable,
d.
Tree Removal Permit and Tree Preservation
Plan, if applicable,
f.
Flood Study, if required, or
g.
Other approvals as required by City,
State, or Federal codes or laws.
4.
Site Plan Standards of Approval.
The City Council or Director of Planning, using the review and approval
process outlined in B.1 and B.2 above, may approve, conditionally
approve, table, or deny a Site Plan based upon the criteria listed
below.
a.
Compliance with the UDC Zoning Regulations
and other applicable regulations and previously approved, valid plans
for the property.
b.
The design and location of off-street
parking and loading facilities to ensure that all such spaces are
usable and are safely arranged.
c.
The width, grade and location of
streets designed to accommodate prospective traffic and to provide
access for firefighting and emergency equipment to buildings.
d.
The use of landscaping and screening
to provide adequate buffers to shield lights, noise, movement or activities
from adjacent properties when necessary, and to complement the design
and location of buildings and be integrated into the overall site
design.
e.
The location, size and configuration
of open space areas to ensure that such areas are suitable for intended
recreation and conservation uses.
f.
Protection and conservation of soils
from erosion by wind or water or from excavation or grading.
g.
Protection and conservation of water
courses and areas subject to flooding.
h.
The adequacy of streets, water, drainage,
wastewater, storm water facilities, garbage disposal and other utilities
necessary for essential services to residents and occupants.
i.
The design of adjacent public street
improvements and Right-of-Way including existing or proposed deceleration
lanes, median openings and left turn bays, location of driveways,
drive aisles, cross access between internal developments, and access
to properties adjacent to the subject site.
j.
The City shall not take action on
a Site Plan for property where City taxes are delinquent.
5.
Site Plan Effect.
a.
Approval of a Site Plan is the City’s
authorization to apply for approval of a Building Permit and to receive
approval of Construction Plans.
b.
During the time the Site Plan remains
valid, the City shall not apply any additional requirements concerning
building placement, streets, drives, parking, landscaping or screening.
c.
Site Plan approval is separate and
distinct from other permits and approvals that may be required by
the City and other regulatory agencies.
d.
Approval of a Site Plan shall not
affect other applicable regulations concerning development and land
use.
e.
Except where authorized by ordinance
or development agreement, a Site Plan shall not be used to approve
a Zoning Variance to development regulations.
6.
Site Plan Lapse.
a.
Two (2) Year Effective Period.
i.
The approval of a Site Plan shall
be effective for a period of two (2) years from the date of filing
of the Application with the Director of Planning. At the end of this
time, the Site Plan shall expire unless the Applicant demonstrates
to the Director of Planning that progress has been made towards completion
of the project for which the Site Plan was approved.
ii. Submission and receipt
of approval of Construction Plans and Building Permits prior to expiration
of the Site Plan shall be evidence of progress towards completion.
iii. However, if Construction
Plans and Building Permits have been approved only for a portion of
the property or if the progress towards completion is only for a portion
of the property or improvements, the Site Plan for the remaining property
or improvements shall expire unless otherwise agreed to in a development
agreement.
b.
Expired Site Plans.
i.
For all expired Site Plans, the Applicant
shall be required to submit a new Site Plan subject to the then existing
regulations (see G above).
ii. Site Plan approval shall
expire upon completion of the improvements shown on the plan. Permits
must remain valid during the construction process.
iii. Subsequent additional
development, site modifications and redevelopment shall be permitted
in accordance with I below and shall be considered a new project subject
to the then existing ordinances, laws and regulations of the City.
H.
Revocation of Site Plan Approval.
The City may revoke approval of a Site Plan if it determines that
the conditions of the approval have not been met or if the plan contains,
or is based upon, incorrect information or if it is determined that
it was obtained using fraud or deceit.
I.
Additional Development, Site Modifications,
or Redevelopment. Following the completion of improvements shown on
an approved Site Plan, additional development, site modifications,
or redevelopment of the site shall be permitted subject to the approval
of a revised Site Plan, which shall be considered a new project and
shall require submittal of a revised Site Plan and the approval of
the City Council under the regulations, requirements and procedures
then in effect.
J.
Design Standards and Specifications.
The following design standards and specifications, as they exist or
may be amended, are required in addition to the design standards and
specification set forth in this UDC:
4.
Engineering Criteria Manual;
5.
Any design standards and specifications
approved by the City Council following the enactment of this provision;
and
K.
Three-Fourths City Council Vote Required
for Planning and Zoning Commission Denial. If the Planning and Zoning
Commission has recommended denial of a Site Plan for a Specific Use
Permit, a three-fourths (3/4) vote of City Council is required to
approve the Application.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
General.
1.
Planned Development (PD) Establishment.
An Application for a Planned Development (PD) zoning district shall
be made to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in
the same manner that an Application for any Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
is made.
2.
Submission of PD Related Plats and
Site Plans. The subsequent Applications for Plats and Site Plans within
an established Planned Development (PD) shall be reviewed and approved
separately and independently in accordance with established procedures.
3.
Area Requirement for a Planned Development
(PD).
a.
Minimum of two (2) contiguous acres.
b.
May be less than two (2) acres when
carrying out the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan, as determined
by City Council and affirmed in the Planned Development (PD) documents.
B.
Planned Development (PD) Submission
Requirements.
1.
The Developer or builder of a PD
shall follow a five (5) step procedure:
a.
Step 1. Pre-Application Meeting.
b.
Step 2. PD Application for Rezoning
and Planned Development Master Plan.
c.
Step 3. Preliminary Plat, (if applicable).
d.
Step 4. Final Plat (if applicable).
2.
Approvals Needed before Proceeding.
a.
Each step must be completed and approved
before the following step is reviewed.
b.
Where appropriate, other methods
authorized in the Subdivision Regulations and Development Standards
may be substituted in Step 3. Preliminary Plat and Step 4. Final Plat
(e.g., an Amending Plat or Minor Plat).
c.
The Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council may, however, review more than one step at the same
public hearing.
3.
Public Hearings (Rezonings and Plats).
a.
Public hearings shall be held on
the Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning) Application and the Planned Development
Master Plan in accordance with regular procedures for zoning Applications.
b.
Public hearings on required Plats
shall be held in accordance with regular procedures established in
the Subdivision Regulations and Development Standards.
C.
Planned Development (PD) Steps for
Creation and Development.
1.
Step 1. Pre-Application Meeting.
a.
The intent of this step is to expedite
and facilitate the approval of a Planned Development Master Plan.
b.
At least ten (10) business days prior
to submission of an Application for Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
to a Planned Development (PD), the Applicant shall submit to the Director
of Planning a Sketch Plan drawn to approximate scale showing streets,
lots, public areas, and other significant features. The Applicant
shall execute an acknowledgement that the Pre-Application Meeting
does not initiate a vested right.
c.
The Applicant should discuss with
the Director of Planning the procedure for adopting a Planned Development
(PD) and the requirements for the general layout of streets and utilities,
access to Arterials, or general design and narrative, the availability
of existing services, and similar matters.
d.
The Director of Planning shall also
advise the Applicant, where appropriate, to discuss the proposed Planned
Development (PD) with those officials charged with responsibility
to review the various aspects of the proposal coming within their
jurisdiction.
2.
Step 2. PD Application for Rezoning
and Planned Development Master Plan.
a.
Procedures and Requirements.
i.
The PD Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
Application shall be filed in accordance with regular procedures and
on Application forms of the City.
ii. The Planned Development
Master Plan, which is submitted with the Application for rezoning,
shall consist of two components:
iii. The Applicant shall
also provide other supporting maps as necessary to meet the submission
requirements of this UDC.
b.
PD Design Statement. The PD Design
Statement shall be a written report containing a minimum of the following
elements:
ii. List of the owners or
Developers;
iii. Statement of the general
location and relationship to adjoining land uses, both existing and
proposed;
iv. Description of the PD
concept, including an acreage or square foot breakdown of land use
areas and densities proposed, a general description proposed, a general
description of building use types, proposed restrictions, and typical
site layouts;
v.
The existing PD zoning districts
in the development area and surrounding it;
vi. Selection of one conventional
zoning district as a base zoning district to regulate all uses and
development regulations not identified as being modified (multiple
base zoning districts may be selected to accommodate a mixture of
land uses in different geographic areas);
vii. A list of all applicable
special development regulations or modified regulations to the base
zoning district; plus a list of requested Subdivision Waivers to the
Subdivision Regulations and Development Standards or other applicable
development regulations;
viii. A statement identifying
the existing and proposed streets, including Right-of-Way standards
and street design concepts;
ix. The following physical
characteristics: elevation, slope analysis, soil characteristics,
tree cover, and drainage information;
x.
A topographic map with minimum five
(5) foot contour intervals;
xi. Drainage information,
including number of acres in the drainage area and delineation of
applicable flood levels;
xii. A statement of utility
lines and services to be installed, including lines to be dedicated
to the City and which will remain private;
xiii. The proposed densities,
and the use types and sizes of structures;
xiv. A description of the
proposed sequence of development; and
xv. Any additional materials
or information deemed necessary by the City to further the purpose
of the PD.
c.
PD Concept Design Map.
i.
The PD Concept Design Map shall be
a graphic representation of the development plan for the area of a
Planned Development (PD).
ii. The Director of Planning
shall establish an Application form outlining all requirements of
the PD Concept Design Map and shall be responsible for maintaining
and revising the Application form.
d.
Approval of the Planned Development
Master Plan.
i.
Upon final approval by the City Council
of the Planned Development Master Plan and the appropriate ordinance
of rezoning, these elements shall become a part of the Zoning District
Map.
ii. The ordinance of rezoning
shall adopt the Planned Development Master Plan by reference, and
it shall be attached to said ordinance and become a part of the official
records of the City.
e.
Expiration of Planned Development
Master Plan.
i.
If, after two (2) years from the
date of approval of a Planned Development Master Plan, no substantial
development progress has been made within the Planned Development
(PD), then the Planned Development Master Plan shall expire unless
otherwise agreed to by development agreement.
ii. If a Planned Development
Master Plan expires, a new Planned Development Master Plan must be
submitted and approved according to the procedures within this section.
(a) An extension to the
two (2) year expiration shall be granted if a development Application
for the Planned Development (PD) has been submitted and is undergoing
the development review process or if the Director of Planning determines
development progress is occurring.
f.
Use and Development of the Property.
After adopted by City Council, the Planned Development Master Plan
shall control the use and development of the property, and all building
permits and development requests shall be in accordance with the plan
until it is amended by the City Council.
3.
Step 3. Preliminary Plat.
a.
If subdivision of land is to occur,
then after City Council approval of the Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
with the associated Planned Development Master Plan, the Developer
shall prepare a Preliminary Plat for the entire development area.
b.
Where a recorded Plat exists and
where there will be no extensive easements, no Homeowners’ or
Property Owners’ Associations, no plat restrictions, and no
sale of lots that do not conform to the platted lot lines, the City
Council may waive the platting requirement.
4.
Step 4. Final Plat.
a.
Where a subdivision Plat is required,
the Developer shall prepare a Final Plat for review, approval, and
filing of record according to procedures established by the City Council.
In addition to these procedures, the Final Plat shall include:
i.
Provisions for the ownership and
maintenance of common open space and detention/retention ponds. Said
open space shall be dedicated to a private association or dedicated
to the public provided that a dedication to the public shall not be
accepted without the approval of the City Council.
ii. A Homeowners’
or Property Owners’ Association shall be created if other satisfactory
arrangements have not been made for improving, operating, and maintaining
common facilities, including private street drives, fire lanes, service
and parking areas, and recreation areas.
b.
If no Plat is required, then proof
of the items identified in subparagraphs a.i and a.ii above shall
be submitted and approved as a part of the Planned Development Master
Plan at the time the Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning).
5.
Step 5. Site Plan.
a.
A Site Plan shall be submitted upon
the Application for a Building Permit and reviewed in accordance with
procedures established in 2.10.07. Site Plans.
D.
Planned Development (PD) Modifications.
1.
Minor PD Amendment and Adjustment.
The Director of Planning may approve or defer to City Council consideration
of a Minor PD Amendment and Adjustment to the Planned Development
Master Plan provided all of the following conditions are satisfied:
a.
The project boundaries are not altered.
b.
Uses other than those specifically
approved in the Planned Development Master Plan are not added. Uses
may be deleted but not to the extent that the character of the project
is substantially altered from the character described within the PD
Design Statement.
c.
The allocation of land to particular
uses or the relationship of uses within the project are not substantially
altered.
d.
The density of housing is not increased
more than ten (10) percent or decreased by more than thirty (30) percent.
e.
The land area allocated to nonresidential
uses is not increased or decreased by more than ten (10) percent.
f.
Floor Area, if prescribed, is not
increased or decreased by more than ten (10) percent.
g.
Floor Area ratios, if prescribed,
are not increased.
h.
Open space ratios, if prescribed,
are not decreased.
2.
Director of Planning Approval.
a.
The Director of Planning shall determine
if proposed amendments to an approved Planned Development Master Plan
satisfy the above criteria.
b.
If the Director of Planning finds
that these criteria are not satisfied, an amended Planned Development
Master Plan shall be submitted for full review and approval according
to the procedures set forth in these regulations.
E.
Reversion.
1.
Property Owner Request.
a.
If the property owner decides to
abandon the PD concept and nullify the Planned Development Master
Plan, he/she shall make application for rezoning either to the original
status or to a new classification.
b.
Said Application shall be heard according
to regular rezoning procedures by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
General. The uses listed under the
various districts within the Use Chart as "S" or Specific Use Permit
(SUP) are so classified because they may have adverse effects or more
intensely dominate the area in which they are located than do other
uses permitted in the district.
B.
Specific Use Permit (SUP) Application
Process.
1.
Procedures for Processing an SUP.
a.
The Director of Planning shall initiate
review of the SUP.
b.
Planning and Zoning Commission shall
review and recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial
of the SUP to the City Council.
c.
After receiving recommendation from
Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council shall approve, approve
with conditions, or deny the SUP. Although the approval of the SUP
does not change the zoning classification.
d.
Both Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council shall provide the required public hearing and notice
in accordance with 2.10.04. Public Hearings and Notification Requirements.
2.
Compatibility Conditions.
a.
The Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council may require conditions and safeguards as necessary
to protect adjoining property.
b.
A use allowed by an SUP shall be
in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and contain such
requirements and safeguards as are necessary to protect adjoining
property.
3.
Required Information.
a.
Each Application shall be accompanied
by a Site Plan (see 2.10.07. Site Plans) and such other information
as is required by this UDC.
b.
The Planning and Zoning Commission
or City Council may require additional information, operating data
and expert evaluation concerning the location and function and characteristics
of any building or use proposed.
C.
Specific Use Permit Regulations.
1.
In recommending that an SUP for the
premises under consideration to be granted, the City Council shall
determine that such uses are harmonious and adaptable to building
structures and uses of abutting property and other property in the
vicinity of the premises under consideration, and shall consider the
following factors:
a.
Safety of the motoring public and
of pedestrians using the facility and the area immediately surrounding
the site;
b.
Adequate means of ingress and egress
to public streets or approved access easements and appropriate paving
widths of streets, alleys and sidewalks to accommodate traffic generated
by the proposed use;
d.
Adequate off-street parking and loading;
e.
Safety from fire hazard and measures
for fire control;
f.
Protection against negative effects
of noise, glare and lighting on the character of the neighborhood,
protective screening and open space;
g.
Heights of structures; and
h.
Compatibility of buildings and such
other measures as will secure and protect the public health, safety,
and general welfare.
2.
In granting an SUP, the City Council
may impose conditions and time limits which shall be complied with
by the owner or grantee before a Certificate of Occupancy may be issued
by the Building Official for use of the building on such property
pursuant to such SUP, and such conditions are precedent to granting
of the Certificate of Occupancy.
D.
Acceptance and Agreed Compliance
by the Applicant, Owner, and Grantee. No SUP shall be granted unless
the Applicant of the SUP shall be willing to accept and agree to be
bound by and comply with the ordinance adopting the SUP, as well as
the attached Site Plan drawings approved by the City Council and shall
comply with the minimum requirements provided in the zoning district
in which the property is located.
E.
Specific Use Permit Expiration and
Extension.
1.
SUP Expiration.
a.
If, after one (1) year from the date
of approval of an SUP, no substantial development progress has been
made within the SUP, then the SUP shall expire.
2.
Specific Use Permit Extension.
a.
The City Council may authorize an
extension beyond the one (1) year upon recommendation by the Director
of Planning.
F.
Amendments Required for Changes.
No building, premise, or land used under an SUP may be enlarged, modified,
structurally altered, or otherwise significantly changed, unless an
amendment to the approved SUP is granted for such enlargement, modifications,
structural alteration, or change.
G.
Prohibition of Board of Adjustment
Action. The Board of Adjustment shall not have jurisdiction to hear,
review, reverse, or modify any decision, determination, or ruling
with respect to the granting, extension, revocation, modification
or any other action taken relating to such SUP.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017; Ordinance 2024-27 adopted 6/4/2024)
A.
Applicability. This section applies
to all properties and development designated or that may be designated
in the future as a historic landmark or located within a Historic
Overlay (O-H) District.
B.
Authority. This section is authorized
through:
1.
Chapter 211 of Texas Local Government
Code, which authorizes zoning functions and procedures for municipalities;
2.
Section 211.003(b) of Texas Local
Government Code, which provides that in the case of designated places
and areas of historical, cultural, or architectural importance and
significance, the governing body of a municipality may regulate the
construction, reconstruction, alteration, or razing of buildings and
other structures;
3.
Section 211.005(a) of Texas Local
Government Code, which authorizes the governing body of a municipality
to divide the municipality into districts, within which the governing
body may regulate the erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration,
repair, or use of buildings, other structures, or land and within
which zoning regulation must be uniform for each class or kind of
building in a district; however, zoning regulations may vary from
district to district;
4.
Section 214.00111 of Texas Local
Government Code provides additional authority to preserve substandard
buildings as historic property which applies only to a municipality
that is designated as a Certified Local Government by the State Historic
Preservation Officer as provided by 16 U.S.C.A. Section 470 et seq.
C.
Purpose and Intent. As a matter of
public policy, the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of landmarks
and districts of historical and cultural importance and significance
is necessary to promote the economic, cultural, educational, and general
welfare of the public. This section is intended to:
1.
Protect and enhance the landmarks
and districts which represent distinctive elements of Buda’s
historic, architectural and cultural heritage;
2.
Foster civic pride in the accomplishments
of the past;
3.
Protect and enhance Buda’s
attractiveness to visitors and the support and stimulus to the economy
thereby provided;
4.
Ensure the harmonious, orderly, and
efficient growth and development of the City that is sensitive to
its historic resources;
5.
Promote economic prosperity and welfare
of the community by encouraging the most appropriate use of historic
properties within the City;
6.
Encourage stabilization, restoration
and improvements of such properties and their values by offering incentives
for rehabilitation.
D.
Criteria for Designation of Historic
Landmarks or Historic Overlay (O-H) District.
1.
An individual Landmark may designated
if it is at least fifty (50) years old and it substantially complies
with two or more of the following:
a.
Listed as Recorded Texas Historic
Landmarks (RTHL), State Archeological Landmark (SAL) or listed on
the National Register of Historic Places (NR)
b.
Possesses significance in history,
architecture, archeology and culture;
c.
Is associated with events that have
made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local, regional,
state, or national history;
d.
Is associated with events that have
made a significant impact in our past;
e.
Represents the work of a master designer,
builder or craftsman;
f.
Embodies the distinctive characteristics
of a type, period or method of construction;
g.
Represents an established and familiar
visual feature of the City;
2.
A District may be designated if it
substantially complies with both of the following:
a.
Contains properties and an environmental
setting which meet two or more of the criteria for designation of
a landmark, and;
b.
Constitutes a distinct section of
the City.
E.
Designation of Historic Landmarks
and Districts.
1.
The procedure for designating a Historic
Landmark or to establish or amend a Historic Overlay (O-H) District
may be initiated by the City (City Council, City Staff or the Historic
Preservation Commission), or by the individual property owner(s).
If the property is owned by an organization that qualifies as a religious
organization under Section 11.20, Tax Code, the City may only designate
the property as a local historic landmark or include the property
in a local historic district if the organization consents to the designation
or inclusion. An application for Determination of Significance shall
be made on forms as prescribed by the City and shall be filed with
the Historic Preservation Officer. Buildings, structures, sites or
areas located within the City which substantially complies with the
criteria found in subsection D above may be recommended to the City
Council as Landmarks or Districts by the Historic Preservation Commission.
The application shall contain:
a.
Name, address, telephone number of
applicant, and physical address of the individual property; or the
name, address, telephone number of applicant, and a signed petition
of at least twenty (20) percent of the proposed area;
b.
Site plan of the individual property
or map indicated the geographic boundaries of the proposed area showing
all affected buildings and/or structures;
c.
Detailed historic description and
background on the property or area;
d.
Current photographs of the overall
property or area along with any historical photographs, if available;
e.
Any other information which the City
may deem necessary.
2.
Interim Control during Historic District
or Historic Landmark Consideration. An individual property or area
that is under review for designation as a Historic Landmark or within
an area proposed for designation to the Historic Overlay (O-H) District
shall be protected by and subject to all of the provisions of this
Section governing demolition, minimum maintenance standards and penalties
until a final decision becomes effective. However, alterations, removal,
or demolition is authorized by formal action of the Director of Planning
as necessary for preservation of the public health, welfare, or safety
as provided for in this Code.
3.
Procedure for Designation or Amendment
of Historic Overlay (O-H) Districts. The procedure for the designation
of a historic district in the City is as follows:
a.
Historic Preservation Commission
Public Hearing and Recommendation.
i.
The Historic Preservation Commission
shall hold a public hearing to consider the Historic Overlay (O-H)
District or Historic Landmark designation. At the hearing, owners,
interested parties and experts may testify and present documents for
or against such designation, which will become part of the record
of the proposed historic district. The burden of proof shall be upon
the applicant.
ii. The Historic Preservation
Commission may recommend the designation of a Historic Overlay (O-H)
District or Historic Landmark designation if the Criteria for Designation
of Historic Landmarks or Historic Overlay (O-H) District as described
in D above are satisfied.
iii. The recommendation
of the Historic Preservation Commission regarding the proposed Historic
Overlay (O-H) District or Historic Landmark designation shall be forwarded
to the Planning and Zoning Commission within forty-five (45) days
of the date of the public hearing. Denials may be appealed directly
to City Council in accordance with Section d below.
b.
Planning and Zoning Commission Public
Hearing and Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall
conduct a public hearing on the proposed Historic Overlay (O-H) District
or Historic Landmark designation within forty-five (45) days of receipt
of the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission. The
Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application to ensure
that the recommended designation will not pose a conflict with the
underlying land use zoning and shall forward its recommendation to
City Council within forty-five (45) days of its hearing.
c.
City Council Public Hearing and Decision.
i.
The City Council shall schedule a
public hearing on the joint recommendation from the Historic Preservation
Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission within forty-five
(45) days of its receipt of the recommendation. Significance shall
be considered only on the record made before the Historic Preservation
Commission and the Planning and Zoning Commission.
ii. Upon the designation
of a Historic Overlay (O-H) District or Historic Landmark, the City
Council shall cause the designation to be recorded in the official
public records of real property in Hays County, the tax records of
the City, and the Hays County Appraisal District as well as the official
zoning map of the City.
iii. Upon the designation
of a building, site or structure as a Historic Landmark or Historic
Overlay (O-H) District, the Historic Preservation Commission shall
provide for a suitable sign or marker on or near the property, at
the applicant’s expense, indicating that the property is so
designated.
d.
The applicant or any persons adversely
affected by any determination of the Historic Preservation Commission
may appeal the decision to City Council. Appeal requests shall be
on forms as prescribed by the City and shall be filed with the Historic
Preservation Officer within seven (7) days of the Historic Preservation
Commission’s decision and scheduled for the next available regularly
scheduled City Council meeting. The City Council shall conduct a public
hearing. Appeals to the City Council shall be considered only on the
record made before the Historic Preservation Commission, and may only
allege that the Historic Preservation Commission’s decision
was arbitrary, capricious or illegal. The burden of proof shall be
upon the applicant or any persons that requested the appeal.
4.
Amending or Rescinding of Historic
Designation. A landmark or district designated as historic may be
amended or rescinded in the same manner and process as the original
designation was made, with the following modifications to process
and criteria for recension of a designation:
a.
Any reconsideration of a previous
listing or evaluation shall employ or examine the designation criteria
set forth in D above;
b.
The Historic Preservation Commission
shall not take final action on such recension without first hearing
the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Officer on the proposed
reevaluation and also giving fifteen (15) days prior notice to the
owner of the subject property under consideration of the possible
change and the date of the Historic Preservation Commission meeting
when the members will consider the proposed recension.
c.
The Historic Preservation Commission
may take into account the state of repair of the site in such reevaluation.
Further, the Historic Preservation Commission may consider the extent
of the owner’s utilization of external financial resources or
exemptions towards financing the rehabilitation or maintenance of
the subject property.
5.
Notification Requirements for Public
Hearings Regarding Designation of Historic Landmarks and Districts.
a.
Published Notice. Notice of all public
hearings required herein must be published before the fifteenth (15th)
day before the public hearing in accordance with 2.10.04. C.2.a Published
Notice.
b.
Written Notice. Written notice of
all public hearings required herein must be mailed to property owners
within two hundred (200) feet of the proposed historic district area
or historic landmark before the fifteenth (15th) day before the public
hearing in accordance with 2.10.04. C.2.b Written Notice for Protest
(also referred to as "Mailed Notice").
F.
Minimum Maintenance Standards. No
owner or person with an interest in real property designated as a
Historic Landmark or a property located within a Historic Overlay
(O-H) District shall permit the property to fall into a serious state
of disrepair so as to result in the significant deterioration of any
exterior architectural feature which would, in the judgment of the
Historic Preservation Commission, create a detrimental effect upon
the historic character of the Historic Landmark or Historic Overlay
(O-H) District. Examples of serious disrepair or significant deterioration
include:
1.
Deterioration of exterior walls,
foundations, or other vertical support that causes leaning, sagging,
splitting, listing or buckling;
2.
Deterioration of external chimneys
that causes leaning, sagging, splitting, listing or buckling;
3.
Deterioration or crumbling of exterior
plaster finishes, surfaces or mortars;
4.
Ineffective waterproofing of exterior
walls, roofs, and foundations, including broken windows or doors;
5.
Defective protection of lack of weather
protection for exterior wall and roof coverings, including lack of
paint, or weathering due to lack of paint or other protective covering;
6.
Rotting, holes, and other forms of
material decay;
7.
Deterioration of exterior stairs,
porches, handrails, window and door frames, cornices, entablatures,
wall facings, and architectural details that causes delamination;
8.
Deterioration that has a detrimental
effect upon the special character of the Historic Overlay (O-H) District
as a whole or the unique attributes and character of the contributing
structure;
9.
Deterioration of any exterior feature
so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe
conditions to life, health, or other property.
G.
Procedure to Mitigate Demolition
by Neglect. Demolition by Neglect refers to the gradual deterioration
of a property when routine or minimum maintenance is not performed.
The Historic Preservation Officer and various City departments work
together in an effort to reduce Demolition by Neglect involving Landmarks
or properties located within Districts within the City. A Demolition
by Neglect citation as determined by the Historic Preservation Commission
may be issued against the owner of the property for failure to comply
with the minimum maintenance standards (F above) by permitting the
subject property to exhibit serious disrepair or significant deterioration
as outlined in this Section.
1.
Due to the time consuming nature
of pursuing enforcement under this section, no more than one property
will be under consideration during each of the following quarters
(January-March, April-June, July-September, and October-December).
2.
While the Historic Preservation Officer
will act as the point of contact, appropriate City staff shall, when
needed, assist with inspections.
3.
The procedure for citing a property
for Demolition by Neglect shall be as follows:
a.
Initial identification is made by
visual inspection of the area by the Historic Preservation Officer
or a Historic Preservation Commission member or by referral from someone
in the area. All referrals shall be made in writing and shall be submitted
to the Historic Preservation Officer.
b.
Once the initial identification is
made, followed by a preliminary determination by the Historic Preservation
Officer, the property owner shall be notified by US mail of the defects
of the building and informed of various incentive programs that may
be available for repair. The owner is given thirty (30) days in which
to respond to the preliminary determination by submitting a stabilization
proposal to Historic Preservation Officer. The stabilization proposal
will be presented to the Historic Preservation Commission at the next
available meeting. If the Historic Preservation Commission approves
the proposal, a Certificate of Appropriateness (if necessary) may
be issued administratively by the Historic Preservation Officer. The
approval will detail the specific work which is necessary to correct
the Demolition by Neglect conditions, as well as a time period to
begin and complete the work. The Historic Preservation Officer shall
update the Historic Preservation Commission on the status of the property
every thirty (30) days once work begins on the property.
c.
If the property owner receives the
letter regarding the preliminary determination, but fails to respond,
a second notice shall be sent in the same manner as described above.
d.
If the property owner fails to receive
and/or respond to the letter regarding the preliminary determination
after two (2) attempts, the matter returns to the Historic Preservation
Commission for a citation hearing. The Historic Preservation Officer
shall send a third notice via certified mail informing the owner of
the hearing, the property is posted with a notice of the violation
in accordance with the provisions of this Section, and a public hearing
on the citation is scheduled.
e.
At the public hearing the owner is
invited to address the Historic Preservation Commission concerns and
to show cause why a citation should not be issued. The Historic Preservation
Commission may take action to approve any proposed work, defer the
matter to give the owner more time either to correct the deficiencies
or make a proposal for stabilization, or issue a citation to the owner
of the property for failure to correct the Demolition by Neglect conditions.
f.
If the owner is cited for the condition
of Demolition by Neglect of the property, he is given fourteen (14)
days to submit a stabilization proposal to the Historic Preservation
Officer, and at the discretion of the Historic Preservation Commission,
up to one (1) year to correct the defects. The Historic Preservation
Officer shall update the Historic Preservation Commission on the status
of the property every thirty (30) days once work begins on the property.
g.
If the owner does respond with a
stabilization proposal, the matter is turned over to the City Attorney’s
office for action in Municipal Court.
H.
Ordinary Maintenance.
1.
Nothing in this Section shall be
construed to prevent the Ordinary Maintenance and repair of any exterior
architectural feature of a landmark or property within a historic
district which does not involve a change in design, material, or outward
appearance that require the issuance of a building permit. In-kind
repair/replacement and repainting is included in this definition of
Ordinary Maintenance unless painting involves an exterior masonry
surface that was not previously painted.
2.
Emergency maintenance and temporary
repair may be authorized by the City, provided said maintenance does
not permanently alter the unique features of the historic landmark
or district in which it is located, and that, within thirty (30) days,
the owner of record applies for the appropriate permits, including
the Certificate of Appropriateness, to make permanent repairs.
I.
Certificates of Appropriateness for
Alterations or New Construction Affecting Landmarks or Historic Districts.
No person shall carry out any construction, reconstruction, alteration,
restoration, rehabilitation, or relocation of any Landmark or any
property within a District. No person shall make any material change
in the light fixtures, signs, sidewalks, fences, steps, paving, or
other exterior elements visible from a public right-of-way which affect
the appearance and cohesiveness of any Landmark or any property within
a District without a Certificate of Appropriateness application. Exterior
temporary items obscuring the facade from the right-of-way shall not
exempt a person from this provision. The application must be reviewed
and approved by the Historic Preservation Officer or the Historic
Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of any building permit
involving any Landmark or property located within a District. The
application shall be required in addition to, and not in lieu of,
any required building permit.
J.
Review Criteria for Certificates
of Appropriateness for Alterations or New Construction Affecting Landmarks
or Historic Districts.
1.
In considering an application for
a Certificate of Appropriateness, the Historic Preservation Officer
and the Historic Preservation Commission shall review it for compliance
with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation
and any applicable adopted Design Guidelines previously ratified by
the City Council.
2.
All review criteria shall be made
available to the applicant, property owners of Landmarks and properties
located within Districts. The Historic Preservation Commission shall
promulgate and make recommendations to update the adopted Design Guidelines
as necessary, provided that the changes do not pose a conflict with
underlying land-use zoning and the changes do not take effect until
ratified by the City Council.
K.
Procedure for Certificates of Appropriateness
for Alterations or New Construction Affecting Landmarks or Historic
Districts. The procedure for obtaining a Certificate of Appropriateness
may be initiated by the City for all City-owned Landmarks or proposed
work within a District, or by the individual property owner(s) of
the subject Landmark or for a property located within a District.
The application must be submitted, reviewed and approved by the Historic
Preservation Officer or the Historic Preservation Commission prior
to the commencement of any work. An application for Certificate of
Appropriateness shall be made on forms as prescribed by the City.
Historic Preservation Commission design review affecting Landmarks
and properties located in Districts shall occur as follows:
1.
Upon receipt of a completed Certificate
of Appropriateness application as determined by the Historic Preservation
Officer, the Historic Preservation Officer shall review the application
to determine completeness and for a preliminary determination of compliance
with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and
any applicable adopted Design Guidelines. The applicant is encouraged
to schedule a meeting with the Historic Preservation Officer prior
to the submittal of an application to discuss the proposed work and
get initial design direction.
2.
Following determination of completeness
and a preliminary determination of compliance, the Historic Preservation
Officer shall determine if the case can be reviewed administratively
(in accordance with L below) or shall schedule a public hearing and
consideration at the next available regularly scheduled Historic Preservation
Commission meeting. All review criteria and the formal written report
to the Historic Preservation Officer shall be made available to the
applicant prior to consideration.
3.
The Historic Preservation Commission
shall review the application at a public meeting. At that time, the
applicant shall have an opportunity to be heard, present testimony
and evidence to demonstrate that the proposed work is in compliance
with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and
any adopted Design Guidelines. Other interested parties and technical
experts may also present testimony or documentary evidence which will
become part of a record. The burden of proof shall be upon the applicant.
4.
The Historic Preservation Commission
may take action to approve, postpone requesting additional information,
or deny the application. If the Historic Preservation Commission has
not taken action to approve or deny the application within ninety
(90) days of the original application being determined complete by
the Historic Preservation Officer, a Certificate of Appropriateness
shall be deemed issued and the Historic Preservation Officer shall
so advise the applicant in writing.
5.
If approved, the Historic Preservation
Officer shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness to the applicant
with the written findings of fact, conclusions of law and any specific
conditions of approval (if any) supporting the decision. The Historic
Preservation Officer shall also forward the Historic Preservation
Commission decision to the appropriate City personnel. Any specific
conditions of approval made by the Historic Preservation Commission
shall be attached to the construction documents prior to the issuance
of any building permits. No subsequent changes shall be made to the
approved design without the prior review and approval of the Historic
Preservation Officer or Historic Preservation Commission. An applicant
shall have one (1) year from the date of issuance of a Certificate
of Appropriateness to secure a building permit for the specified improvements
or it shall become null and void.
6.
If the Historic Preservation Commission
finds the proposed work will have an Adverse Effect on the Landmark,
or property located within a District, or if the proposed work is
inconsistent with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation
or any applicable adopted Design Guidelines, the Historic Preservation
Commission shall advise the applicant at the meeting of the disapproval
of the application and of any changes to the application which are
necessary to approval of the same. Within five (5) days following
the meeting, the Historic Preservation Officer shall provide the applicant
noticing in writing of the disapproval of the application and of any
changes to the application which are necessary for approval of the
same. A Certificate of Appropriateness application that has been denied
may not be resubmitted without incorporating changes to the application
which are necessary for approval of the same.
7.
The applicant or any persons adversely
affected by the action of the Historic Preservation Commission may
appeal the decision to the City Council. Appeal requests shall be
filed in writing to the Historic Preservation Officer within ten (10)
days of the Historic Preservation Commission decision. The Historic
Preservation Officer must schedule the appeal at the next available
regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Appeals of decisions made
under Administrative Review will be heard by the Historic Preservation
Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting.
8.
Appeals to the City Council shall
be considered only on the record made before the Historic Preservation
Commission, and may only allege that the Historic Preservation Commission
decision was arbitrary, capricious, or illegal.
L.
Certificate of Appropriateness -
Administrative Review. Applications for certain minor alterations,
additions, and repairs may be reviewed and approved administratively
by the Historic Preservation Officer without review by the Historic
Preservation Commission. Those activities will be determined on a
case by case basis by the Historic Preservation Officer.
1.
Administrative review is allowed
for City initiated infrastructure improvements within City owned property
or within the right-of-way.
M.
Demolition of Landmarks. It is the
intent of this and succeeding sections to preserve the historic and
architectural resources of the city through limitations on demolition
and removal of Landmarks to the extent it is economically feasible
practical and necessary. The demolition or removal of historic buildings
structures and sites in the city diminishes the character of the city’s
historic Districts and it is strongly discouraged. Instead the city
recommends and supports preservation rehabilitation and relocation
within the historic district. It is recognized however that structural
deterioration, economic hardship and other factors not entirely within
the control of the property owner may result in the necessary demolition
or removal of a historic building structure or site. All demolition
permits require a sixty (60) day stay of demolition to allow for exploration
of options to preserve the structure.
1.
Removal or repair of hazardous or
dangerous Landmarks.
a.
If the building official determines
a Landmark to be structurally unsound and a hazardous or dangerous
building pursuant to the provisions found in the city’s adopted
building code, the building official shall be required to provide
written notice to the Historic Preservation Commission of the ordered
removal or repair of the Landmark prior to taking such action.
b.
The provisions contained in Section
214.00111 of the Texas Local Government Code provides additional authority
to the city to preserve substandard historic buildings and are effective
immediately upon designation as a Certified Local Government by the
US Department of the Interior, National Park Service and Texas State
Historic Preservation Officer as provided by 16 U.S.C., Section 470
et seq.; and
c.
The property owner(s) of the demolished
Landmark removed under this procedure is subject to the penalties
found in this Code.
N.
Certificates of Appropriateness for
Demolition Affecting Landmarks or Historic Districts. No person shall
carry out the demolition of a Landmark or property within a District,
including secondary buildings and landscape features that are not
previously deemed a hazardous or dangerous building by the building
official, or without the review and approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness
for Demolition application by the Historic Preservation Commission.
The application shall be required in addition to, and not in lieu
of, any required building permit.
1.
In the absence of a determination
by the building official of the subject property as a hazardous or
dangerous building, the Historic Preservation Commission may consider
an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition
of a Landmark or property located within a District, only if it meets
compliance with one of the following:
a.
The subject property of the application
is not a recognized Landmark;
b.
The subject building, structure or
object is not an accessory building and/or landscape feature that
is integral to the historic interpretation or integrity of the Landmark;
c.
The applicant is requesting a Certificate
of Appropriateness for Demolition of a Landmark on the basis of Economic
Hardship and the Historic Preservation Commission finds that the applicant
meets the criteria of Economic Hardship pursuant to P below.
d.
The subject building, structure or
object has lost its architectural significance and integrity over
time for reasons not entirely within the control of the current or
previous property owner(s).
O.
Procedure for Certificates of Appropriateness
for Demolition Affecting Landmarks or Historic Districts. The procedure
for obtaining a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition may
be initiated by the city for all city-owned Landmarks or proposed
work within a District, or by the individual property owner(s) of
the subject Landmark or property within a District. The application
must be submitted to the Historic Preservation Officer for review
and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission prior to the
commencement of any work. An application for Certificate of Appropriateness
for Demolition shall be made on forms as prescribed by the city.
1.
The application shall contain:
a.
Name, address, telephone number of
applicant, and physical address of the individual property;
b.
Site plan of the individual property
or map indicating the area of the proposed demolition showing all
affected buildings and/or structures on the site;
c.
Photographs of existing conditions
as well as any historical photographs, if available;
d.
All future development plans for
the property, if available;
e.
Any other information which the Historic
Preservation Officer or Historic Preservation Commission may deem
necessary.
2.
An individual property that is under
review by the City for a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition
shall be protected by and subject to all of the provisions of this
Section governing demolition, minimum maintenance standards and penalties
until a final decision by the Historic Preservation Commission.
3.
The procedure for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for Demolitions shall be the same as provided for
in K above.
4.
The procedure for a Certificate of
Appropriateness for Demolition application involving a claim of Economic
Hardship shall be as follows:
a.
Upon receipt of a completed Certificate
of Appropriateness for Demolition application, the Historic Preservation
Officer shall review the application for a preliminary determination
of compliance with the standards for economic hardship and the criteria
for review found in P below. The applicant is encouraged to schedule
a meeting with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to the submittal
of an application to discuss the application and get initial direction.
b.
Following determination of completeness
of a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition application involving
a claim of Economic Hardship and a preliminary determination of compliance,
the Historic Preservation Officer shall schedule a public hearing
and consideration at the next available regularly scheduled Historic
Preservation Commission meeting. All review criteria and the formal
written report to the Historic Preservation Officer shall be made
available to the applicant prior to consideration. The owner shall
be required to stabilize and secure the property subject to the penalties
of this Section until a final decision by the Historic Preservation
Commission becomes effective.
c.
The Historic Preservation Commission
shall conduct its initial review of the application at a public meeting.
At that time, the applicant shall have an opportunity to be heard,
present testimony and evidence to demonstrate that standards for economic
hardship and the criteria for review have been met. Other interested
parties and technical experts may also present testimony or documentary
evidence which will become part of a record. The burden of proof shall
be upon the applicant. In the event the Historic Preservation Commission
does not act within ninety (90) days of the initial application being
determined complete, a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition
may be granted.
d.
In considering the application, the
Historic Preservation Commission may take action to postpone the application
in order to establish a Stay of Demolition period. The owner shall
conduct in good faith with the city local preservation organizations
and interested parties a diligent effort to seek an alternative that
will result in the rehabilitation of the Landmark. Negotiations may
include but are not limited to such actions to utilize various preservation
incentive programs sell or lease the Landmark, or facilitate proceedings
for the city to acquire the Landmark under its power of eminent domain,
if appropriate, and financially possible. If negotiations are successful,
the Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition application shall
be considered withdrawn and all associated applications closed.
e.
At the end of the one hundred and
eighty (180) days, if prior negotiations are unsuccessful and the
request for demolition stands, the Historic Preservation Officer shall
schedule a second public hearing on the application at the next available
Historic Preservation Commission meeting pursuant to the same manner
described above in b above.
f.
At the end of the second hearing,
the Historic Preservation Commission may take action to approve, postpone
requesting additional information or deny the application. If no hearing
has been scheduled within sixty (60) days of the end of the stay period,
a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition shall be deemed issued
and the Historic Preservation Officer shall so advise the applicant
in writing.
g.
If approved, the Historic Preservation
Officer shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition
to the applicant with the written findings of fact, conclusions of
law and any specific conditions of approval (if any) supporting the
decision. The Historic Preservation Officer shall also forward the
Historic Preservation Commission decision to the appropriate City
personnel. The approval shall be valid for one (1) year from the hearing
date of the Historic Preservation Commission final decision. The historic
property shall immediately be removed from the city’s inventory
of historic properties in the official public records of real property
of Hays County and the official zoning maps of the city, as applicable.
i.
Prior to demolition, the city may
as a condition of approval require the owner to provide documentation
of the historic property at the owner’s expense in accordance
with the standards of the Historic American Building Survey (HABS).
Such documentation may include photographs, floor plans, measured
drawings, an archeological survey, or other information as specified.
ii. Approval for the demolition
of a structure may be conditioned upon the construction of an acceptable
replacement structure, or landscape or park plan. A bond or other
financial guaranty in the amount of the cost of the replacement structure
may be required in order to assure the construction of the replacement
structure, or park, or landscape plan.
iii. The city may also require
the owner to incorporate an appropriate memorialization of the building,
structure or site such as a photographic display or plaque into any
proposed future development project on the property.
h.
Denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness
for Demolition application involving Economic Hardship shall prevent
the owner from demolishing the property or reapplying for another
Certificate of Appropriateness for Demolition application for a period
of three (3) years from the hearing date of the Historic Preservation
Commission final decision, unless substantial changes in circumstances
have occurred other than resale of the property or those caused by
acts beyond the control of the owner. It shall be the responsibility
of the owner to stabilize and maintain the minimum maintenance standards
for the property so as not to create a hazardous or dangerous building.
i.
The city may continue to provide
the owner with information regarding financial assistance for the
necessary rehabilitation or repair work as it becomes available.
j.
The owner may appeal the decision
of the Historic Preservation Commission to the City Council. Appeal
requests shall be filed in writing to the Historic Preservation Officer
within ten (10) days of the Historic Preservation Commission decision.
The City Council shall give notice, follow publication procedure,
hold hearings, and make its decision in the same manner as provided
in the general zoning ordinance of the city. Appeals to the City Council
shall be considered only on the record made before the Historic Preservation
Commission, and may only allege that the Historic Preservation Commission
decision was arbitrary, capricious, or illegal.
P.
Economic Hardship involving Certificates
of Appropriateness for Demolition Affecting Landmarks.
1.
No Certificate of Appropriateness
for Demolition involving a claim of economic hardship may be approved,
nor shall a demolition permit be issued by the City, unless the owner
proves compliance with the following standards for economic hardship:
a.
The property is incapable of earning
a reasonable return in its current or rehabilitated state, regardless
of whether that return represents the most profitable return possible;
b.
The property cannot be adapted for
any other use, whether by the current owner or by a purchaser, which
would result in a reasonable return;
c.
Earnest and reasonable efforts to
find a purchaser interested in acquiring the property and preserving
it have failed;
d.
The property cannot be moved or relocated
to another site similar site or within the District.
2.
The City may adopt by resolution
separate criteria for review in considering claims of economic hardship
for investment for income producing and non-income producing properties,
as recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission. Non-income
properties shall consist of owner occupied single family swellings
and non-income producing institutional properties. All standards for
review shall be made available to the owner prior to the hearing.
The information to be considered by the City may include but not be
limited to the following:
a.
Purchase date price and financing
arrangements;
e.
Cost estimates of demolition and
post demolition plans for development;
f.
Maintenance and operating costs;
g.
Inspection report by licensed architect
or structural engineer having experience working with historic properties;
h.
Costs and engineering feasibility
for rehabilitation;
i.
Property tax information;
j.
Rental rates and gross income from
the property;
k.
Other additional information as deemed
appropriate.
3.
Claims of economic hardship by the
owner shall not be based on conditions resulting from:
a.
Evidence of demolition by neglect
or other willful and negligent acts by the owner;
b.
Purchasing the property for substantially
more than market value at the time of purchase;
c.
Failure to perform normal maintenance
and repairs;
d.
Failure to diligently solicit and
retain tenants;
e.
Failure to provide normal tenant
improvements.
4.
Throughout the process, the applicant
shall consult in good faith with the Historic Preservation Officer,
local preservation groups and interested parties in a diligent effort
to seek an alternative that will result in preservation of the property.
Such efforts must be demonstrated to the Historic Preservation Commission
at the hearing.
Q.
Enforcement.
1.
It shall be unlawful to construct,
reconstruct, significantly alter, restore or demolish any building
or structure designated as a Landmark or in a designated District
in violation of the provisions of this Section. The City, in addition
to other remedies, may institute any appropriate action or proceeding
to prevent such unlawful construction, reconstruction, significant
alteration or demolition to restrain, correct or abate such violation
or to prevent any illegal act, business or maintenance in and about
such premises, including acquisition of the property.
2.
The City shall periodically inspect
Districts and Landmarks to assure all activity is in compliance with
this Section. If the work is not performed in accordance with the
certificate, or this Section, the City shall issue a stop work order
and all work shall immediately cease. No further work shall be undertaken
on the project while the stop work order is in effect.
3.
Where a violation of this section
of the UDC occurs or appears reasonably imminent, the Building Official,
Fire Marshal, Historic Preservation Officer, or Historic Preservation
Commission may recommend that the City apply to an appropriate court
of law for an injunction to stop the violation or imminent violation,
or restore the affected property to its previous condition.
4.
This section shall not preclude any
other lawful remedies available to the City for violations of this
Section of the Unified Development Code.
R.
Fences and walls.
1.
For regulations regarding fences
and walls in the Historic District, see Section 2.09.02.B and the
City of Buda Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017; Ordinance 2020-04 adopted 3/24/2020; Ordinance
2022-24 adopted 9/20/2022; Ordinance 2023-03 adopted 5/2/2023; Ordinance
2024-27 adopted 6/4/2024)
A.
Intent. See 2.05.01. Rural Heritage
Overlay (O-R) District.
B.
Applicability. Unless otherwise stated
in this section, the following regulations apply to all non-single
family properties within the Rural Heritage Overlay (O-R) District.
The following regulations are in addition to the underlying base district
regulations. In the event of a conflict, the more restrictive regulations
shall apply.
C.
Buildings and Site Development.
1.
Buildings. All buildings or sites
shall incorporate all of the following requirements:
Figure 50. Board and Batten
Style
|
a. Roofs must be metal with a pitch of at least 4:12.
b. Buildings must be oriented
to face toward the roadway.
c. Structures must be constructed
of one hundred (100) percent Class A masonry; however fiber cement
in a vertical Board and Batten style may comprise up to twenty-five
(25) percent.
2.
Parking.
a.
If parking is located between the
front building face and the roadway, Internal Landscaping requirements
of 2.09.01. A.2.d.i and ii shall be doubled.
3.
Streetscape.
Figure 51. Reverse Channel
Lettering (Top) and Downward-Facing Lamps (Bottom)
|
a.
All lighted signs must use reverse
channel lettering (i.e., backlighting) or fully shielded downward-facing
lamps (i.e., gooseneck lighting).
b.
Meandering sidewalks at least six
(6) feet in width must be provided.
c.
To lessen light pollution along the
corridors, the mounting height regulations of Table 27 shall apply
in the district in place of those included in Table 21 on page 148.
Table 27. Modified Mounting
Heights for Lighting in Parking Areas
|
Longest Dimension of Parking
Area
|
Maximum Lighting Unit Mounting
Height
|
Zero - 60 Feet
|
12 Feet
|
61 - 100 Feet
|
16 Feet
|
101 Feet or Greater
|
24 Feet
|
d.
In addition to the requirements of
2.09.01. Landscaping, a street frontage buffer forty (40) feet in
width shall be provided along the Right-of-Way of each designated
corridor.
i.
Parking areas are prohibited within
this buffer.
ii. No Protected Tree, Signature
Tree, or Heritage Tree shall be removed in the street frontage buffer
except as necessary to allow access driveways perpendicular to the
roadway.
iii. In addition to the
landscaping requirements, each one hundred fifty (150) linear feet
(or fraction thereof) of the required street frontage buffer shall
consist of the following planting materials:
(a) A minimum of six (6)
Shade Trees, of which at least four (4) shall be evergreen trees and
no single tree species shall constitute more than one-third (1/3)
of all required trees;
(b) A minimum of four (4)
Ornamental Trees; and
(c) A minimum of thirty
(30) Shrubs.
iv. Undeveloped properties
or properties that do not contain structures or parking areas within
two hundred (200) feet of the Right-of-Way shall be exempt from these
street frontage buffer provisions.
4.
Alternatives. All buildings or sites
must incorporate at least four (4) of the following alternatives:
a.
Decorative split rail fencing not
exceeding three (3) feet in height adjacent to the right-of-way along
the entire width of the property (excluding ingress/egress);
b.
Stained wood building accents (e.g.,
columns, shutters, trim)
c.
No parking located in front of the
building face;
d.
Covered porch at least ten (10) feet
deep and fifty (50) percent of the building face width (porch may
extend into required buffer, must have consistent roof material);
e.
Covered bicycle parking within fifty
(50) feet of the main entrance, with dedicated spaces accessible without
moving another bicycle to accommodate at least:
i.
Five (5) bicycles for buildings less
than seven thousand (7,000) square feet,
ii. Ten (10) bicycles for
buildings between seven thousand (7,000) and thirty thousand (30,000)
square feet, or
iii. Twenty (20) bicycles
for buildings larger than thirty thousand (30,000) square feet.
f.
All hardscape in front of the building
face constructed entirely of an enhanced design, such as stained concrete,
pavers, or stone.
g.
All exterior lights operated by motion
sensor only to turn off when no activity is present.
h.
Achieve all required elements and
at least four (4) alternative options of Table 22. Low Impact Design
Element Options (on page 155).
D.
Land Use. Uses shall be permitted
in the Rural Heritage Overlay (O-R) District as shown in 2.06.05.
Use Chart, with the exception of those the as shown in Table 28.
1.
Location of Fuel Pumps (Accessory
Use). Fuel pumps must be located to the side or rear of the primary
structure, except with Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone or Contributing
Zone is present on the property.
Table 28. Uses Permitted in
the Rural Heritage Overlay (O-R) District
|
---|
Use Classification
|
B-1
|
B-2
|
B-3
|
LI
|
HI
|
---|
Automobile or Other Motorized Vehicle
Sales
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Automobile Service Garage (Major)
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Automobile Service Garage (Minor)
|
|
S
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
Car Wash, Full Service
|
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
P
|
Car Wash, Self Service
|
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
P
|
Equipment Sales
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Equipment Storage Building or Structure
(Pertaining to Wireless Facilities)
|
|
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
Feed Store
|
|
|
S
|
S
|
S
|
Restaurant or Cafeteria, with Curb
or Drive-Thru Service
|
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
P
|
Storage Units, Mini
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Woodworking and Planing Mill
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
Adult Entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy Industrial or Manufacturing
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heliport or Helistop
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laundry, Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured Home Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pawn Shop
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portable Building Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxi Garage or Dispatch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wrecking or Auto Salvage Yard
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondepository Financial Institution/Payday
Lending Establishment
|
|
|
|
|
|
*All conditions listed in 2.06.06.
Conditional Standards remain applicable
|
E.
Alternative Compliance Option. A
request for the following Alternative Compliance options may be submitted
and acted upon in accordance with 2.11.01. Alternative Compliance:
1.
Consider granting credit for existing
plant material.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Intent. See
2.05.02. Gateway Corridor Overlay (O-G) District.
B.
Applicability. Unless otherwise stated in this section, the following regulations
apply to all non-single family properties within the Gateway Corridor
Overlay (O-G) District in addition to the regulations of each underlying
base district. In the event of a conflict, the more restrictive regulations
shall apply.
C.
Buildings and Site Development.
1.
Buildings.
a.
Primary buildings shall be set back
no more than five (5) feet beyond the minimum front yard setback of
the underlying base district, unless site restrictions prohibit such
placement as determined by the City Engineer. This setback is measured
by the portion of the building face closest to the street.
Figure 52. Larger Building
Designed to Appear as Separate Buildings
|
b. Buildings with a ground floor area of larger than thirty thousand
(30,000) square feet shall be designed to appear as separate but attached
buildings through the use of building material changes, wall plane/horizontal
articulation, and roofline/vertical articulation.
c. The primary entrance
for all buildings and ground-level leasable space shall be accessed
by the front sidewalk.
d. Windows shall comprise
between fifty (50) and eighty (80) percent of each ground-level building
elevation fronting the public right-of-way or accessible by sidewalk.
i.
Section 1.01.01(C)(1)(d) glazing
standards are amended for buildings fronting Robert S. Light between
IH-35 and Hwy 1626, for which windows shall compromise a minimum of
thirty (30) percent of the ground-level building elevation fronting
the public right-of-way or accessible by sidewalk.
2.
Parking.
a.
All parking shall be located behind
the front façade of the primary building.
b.
If covered parking is provided for
vehicles, at least fifty (50) percent of the bicycle parking shall
be covered.
3.
Streetscape.
a.
Sidewalks at least ten (10) feet
in width shall be provided.
b.
Retail buildings located in Form
Based zoning districts shall have canopies spanning seventy-five (75)
percent of the frontage and extending over the sidewalk at least six
(6) feet.
c.
In addition to the landscaping requirements of section
2.09.01, development shall provide the following along the Right-of-Way of each designated corridor:
i.
Properties that do not have a Form
Based zoning designation shall provide an expanded landscape buffer
to accommodate:
(a) an additional offset
row of shade trees planted every forty (40) feet on center, for a
total of two (2) alternating rows planted within the landscape buffer,
or one row on either side of the sidewalk. No single tree species
shall constitute more than one-third (1/3) of all required trees.
(b) A minimum of thirty
shrubs per every one hundred and fifty (150) linear feet[.]
(c) Trees and shrubs can
be clustered at the discretion of the Development Services Director.
ii. Properties within a
Form Based zoning district shall provide one shade tree planted every
thirty (30) feet on center between the street and the pedestrian path.
d.
Retail buildings located in Form
Based zoning districts shall have canopies spanning seventy-five (75)
percent of the frontage and extending over the sidewalk at least six
(6) feet.
D.
Land Use. Uses shall be permitted
in the Gateway Corridor Overlay (O-G) District as shown in 2.06.05.
Use Chart, with the exception of those the as shown in Table 29.
Table 29. Uses Permitted in
the Gateway Corridor Overlay (O-G) District
|
---|
Use Classification
|
B-1
|
B-2
|
B-3
|
LI
|
HI
|
---|
Automobile or Other Motorized Vehicle
Sales
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Automobile Service Garage (Major)
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Automobile Service Garage (Minor)
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Car Wash, Full Service
|
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
P
|
Car Wash, Self Service
|
|
|
|
P
|
P
|
Equipment Sales
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Equipment Storage Building or Structure
(Pertaining to Wireless Facilities)
|
|
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
Feed Store
|
|
|
S
|
S
|
S
|
Restaurant or Cafeteria, with Curb
or Drive-Thru Service
|
|
S
|
S
|
P
|
P
|
Office/Showroom
|
|
|
P
|
P
|
|
Office/Warehouse
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Storage Units, Mini
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
|
S
|
P
|
Woodworking and Planning Mill
|
|
|
|
|
S
|
Adult Entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy Industrial or Manufacturing
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heliport or Helistop
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laundry, Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured Home Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pawn Shop
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portable Building Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxi Garage or Dispatch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wrecking or Auto Salvage Yard
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondepository Financial Institution/Payday
Lending Establishment
|
|
|
|
|
|
* All conditions listed in 2.06.06.
Conditional Standards remain applicable
|
E.
Alternative Compliance Option. A
request for the following Alternative Compliance options may be submitted
and acted upon in accordance with 2.11.01. Alternative Compliance:
1.
Consider granting credit for existing
plant material.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017; Ordinance 2022-34 adopted 12/6/2022)
A.
Intent of Provisions.
1.
Purpose.
a.
The purpose of this section is to
establish provisions for the allowance and potential alteration of
uses, lots, or structures that do not conform to currently applicable
standards or regulations, but that were in conformance with standards
in place at the time of their inception, and have been rendered nonconforming
due to a change in the applicable standards and regulations.
i.
Nonconformities occur in three (3)
categories, or combinations thereof:
(a) Nonconforming Lot. An
existing lot that does not meet the dimensional requirements.
(b) Nonconforming Structure.
An existing structure that does not meet the dimension requirements,
masonry requirements, or landscaping requirements.
(c) Nonconforming Use. An
existing use that does not comply with the permitted uses, landscaping,
or parking requirements.
b.
It is the declared intent of this
section that Nonconforming Uses and Nonconforming Structures eventually
be eliminated and be required to comply with the regulations of the
UDC, having due regard for the property rights of the person affected,
the public welfare, and the character of the surrounding area.
B.
Establishment of Legal Nonconforming
Status.
1.
Existence. For purposes of interpretation
of this subsection, any Nonconforming Uses, Nonconforming Structures,
or Nonconforming Lots that in whole or part are not in conformance
with current zoning standards shall be considered as follows.
a.
Legal Nonconforming. Those Nonconforming
Uses, Nonconforming Structures, or Nonconforming Lots that in whole
or part are not in conformance with current zoning standards, but
were legally established at a prior date, at which time they were
in conformance with applicable standards. Such Nonconforming Uses,
Nonconforming Structures, or Nonconforming Lots may be maintained
or potentially altered subject to the provisions of this subsection.
b.
Illegal Status.
i.
Nonconforming Uses, Nonconforming
Structures, or Nonconforming Lots that were not conforming at the
time of creation are considered illegal uses, structures, or lots.
ii. Nonconforming Uses,
Nonconforming Structures, or Nonconforming Lots shall not be approved
for any alterations or expansion.
iii. Nonconforming Uses,
Nonconforming Structures, or Nonconforming Lots shall undertake necessary
remedial measures to reach conformance with the current standards,
or be discontinued.
2.
Time of Adoption. Any use, platted
lot, or structure that is a lawful use at the time of the adoption
of any amendment to this UDC but by such amendment is placed in a
district wherein such use, platted lot, or structure is not otherwise
permitted shall be deemed legal nonconforming.
C.
Burden of Demonstration. The burden
of establishing that any nonconformity is a legal nonconformity as
defined in this subsection shall be borne by the owner or proponent
of such nonconformity.
Table 30. Summary of Nonconformity
Regulations
|
---|
Issue
|
Action
|
Regulation
|
---|
Nonconforming Lot
|
Existing platted lots
|
Any legally confirming existing lot
platted prior to the adoption of this UDC is a conforming lot.
|
Residential lot exemption
|
Minimum lot area is determined by
the respective district, except that a lot having less area than required
that was an official "lot of record" prior to the adoption of this
UDC may be used for a single family dwelling.
|
Nonconforming Structure
|
Prohibited expansion
|
A nonconforming structure shall not
be expanded or increased as of the effective date of this UDC except
as provided in F.3 below.
|
Conforming use in a nonconforming
structure
|
Where a conforming use is located
in a Nonconforming Structure, the use may be changed to another conforming
use.
|
Nonconforming structure expansion
with conforming uses
|
Gross floor area shall not increase
more than 10% from when the building became nonconforming. The expansion
must be conforming.
|
Structure is removed from the premises
|
The nonconforming structure shall
be considered to have been discontinued, regardless of intent.
|
Reuse of abandoned or vacant buildings
by a conforming use
|
If abandoned for 6+ months, shall
only be preoccupied by a conforming use
|
Total destruction by fire, elements,
or other cause
|
Shall not be rebuilt except to conform
to the provisions of this UDC.
|
Partial destruction by fire, elements,
or other cause
|
If 51%+ of its total appraised value
is destroyed, reconstruction will be permitted but the existing square
footage of function of the Nonconforming Structure cannot be expanded.
|
Building or use is altered at least
20% of the original floor area
|
The standards and criteria contained
within 2.09.01. Landscaping shall apply.
|
Building or use is changed or enlarged
in floor area, number of dwelling units, seating capacity or otherwise,
to create a need for additional parking spaces
|
Such additional parking spaces shall
be provided based on the new use or area unless a Zoning Special Exception
is granted for a reduced parking requirement.
|
Relocation
|
May be relocated within the same
platted lot and must comply with all screening and setback requirements.
|
Nonconforming Use
|
Nonconforming Use expansions and
changes
|
A Nonconforming Use shall not be
expanded or increased except as provided in E.4 below. Any Nonconforming
Use may be changed to a conforming use, and once such change is made,
the use shall not be changed back to a Nonconforming Use. A Nonconforming
Use shall not be changed to another Nonconforming Use.
|
Reuse of abandoned or vacant buildings
by conforming uses
|
Buildings or structures that have
been vacant or abandoned for more than six (6) months and do not meet
the current area regulations or development standards shall be allowed
to be reoccupied only by a conforming use.
|
Ceases operation for 6+ months
|
The Nonconforming Use shall be deemed
to be permanently discontinued.
|
Expanding in existing building
|
No structural alterations except
maintenance/safety. The number of dwelling units shall not be increased.
Nonconforming Use shall not occupy any land outside the building.
|
Building or use is altered at least
20% of the original floor area
|
The standards and criteria contained
within 2.09.01. Landscaping shall apply.
|
Building or use is changed or enlarged
in floor area, number of dwelling units, seating capacity or otherwise,
to create a need for additional parking spaces
|
Such additional parking spaces shall
be provided based on the new use or area unless a Zoning Special Exception
is granted for a reduced parking requirement.
|
Expansion located outdoors
|
A Nonconforming Use located outdoors
or that is otherwise not located in an existing building may be extended
throughout the existing lot, provided: 1) the use does not extend
beyond one lot, and 2) the use is screening in accordance with 2.09.02.
|
D.
Nonconforming Lots.
1.
Existing Platted Lots are Conforming
Lots. Any existing lot platted prior to the adoption of this UDC,
which was legally conforming, shall be deemed a conforming lot.
2.
Residential Lot Exemption. The minimum
residential lot areas for the various zoning districts shall be in
accordance with their respective districts, except that a lot having
less area than herein required that was an official "lot of record"
prior to the adoption of this UDC may be used for a single family
dwelling.
E.
Nonconforming Uses.
1.
Discontinuance of Nonconforming Use.
a.
If a Nonconforming Use ceases operations
for a period of more than six (6) months, then such Nonconforming
Use shall be deemed to be permanently discontinued. Unless the Board
of Adjustment reinstates the nonconforming rights pursuant to 7 below,
such a use shall not be instituted on that parcel or other parcel
in a district that does not permit the discontinued use.
b.
For the purpose of this paragraph,
to "cease operations" shall mean to intentionally terminate operations
of the Nonconforming Use. Any Nonconforming Use that does not involve
a permanent type of structure or operation and that is moved from
the premises shall be considered to have been discontinued, regardless
of intent.
2.
Reuse of Abandoned or Vacant Buildings
by Conforming Uses Allowed. Buildings or structures that have been
vacant or abandoned for more than six (6) months and do not meet the
current area regulations or development standards shall be allowed
to be reoccupied only by a conforming use.
3.
Prohibited Expansion of Nonconforming
Uses.
a.
A Nonconforming Use shall not be
expanded or increased as of the effective date of this UDC except
as provided in 4 below.
b.
Any Nonconforming Use may be changed
to a conforming use, and once such change is made, the use shall not
be changed back to a Nonconforming Use.
c.
A Nonconforming Use shall not be
changed to another Nonconforming Use.
4.
Expansion of Nonconforming Uses.
An expansion of a Nonconforming Use is allowed only in accordance
with the following:
a.
Nonconforming Use Expansion in an
Existing Building.
i.
A Nonconforming Use located within
a building may be extended throughout the existing building, provided:
(a) No structural alteration
may be made on or in the building except those required by law to
preserve such building in a structurally sound condition; and
(b) The number of dwelling
units or rooms in a residential Nonconforming Use shall not be increased
so as to exceed the number of dwelling units or rooms existing at
the time said use became a Nonconforming Use.
ii. A Nonconforming Use
within a building shall not be extended to occupy any land outside
the building.
b.
Nonconforming Use Expansion Located
Outdoors. A Nonconforming Use located outdoors or that is otherwise
not located in an existing building may be extended throughout the
existing lot, provided:
i.
The use does not extend beyond one
lot, and
ii. The use is screened
in accordance with 2.09.02. Fencing and Screening.
5.
Noncompliance with Off-Street Parking
Requirements. If a use is deemed nonconforming due to noncompliance
with off-street parking requirements, the following shall apply:
a.
Whenever a building or use is changed
or enlarged in floor area, number of dwelling units, seating capacity
or otherwise, to create a need for additional parking spaces, such
additional spaces shall be provided in accordance with 2.09.03. Off-Street
Parking based on the new use or area.
b.
This requirement does not apply if
a Zoning Special Exception or Alternative Compliance has been granted
for a reduced parking requirement.
6.
Noncompliance with Landscaping Requirements.
If a use is deemed nonconforming due to noncompliance with landscaping
requirements, the following shall apply:
a.
If an existing building or use is
altered (i.e., at least twenty (20) percent of the original floor
area), then the standards and criteria contained within 2.09.01. Landscaping
shall apply.
b.
If an existing building is altered
less than twenty (20) percent, then the standards and criteria contained
in 2.09.01. Landscaping shall not apply.
c.
Additionally, any use requiring a
Specific Use Permit or a Planned Development zoning designation must
comply with 2.09.01. Landscaping unless special landscaping standards
are otherwise provided for in the ordinance establishing the SUP or
PD district.
7.
Reinstatement of Nonconforming Use
Rights.
a.
Application for Nonconforming Rights
Reinstatement.
i.
The owner or operator of the abandoned
nonconforming use may submit a written Application to the Board of
Adjustment to have the nonconforming rights reinstated.
ii. Written Application
for reinstatement of nonconforming rights must be made within ten
(10) business days after the Director of Planning issues the written
notice of determination that a use has been permanently abandoned.
b.
Board Decision.
i.
The Board of Adjustment may reinstate
Nonconforming Use rights only if the Board finds that the use was
not discontinued for six (6) months or more.
ii. The failure of the owner
or operator to remove on-premise signs shall not be considered (on
its own) evidence of a continuing use.
F.
Nonconforming Structures.
1.
Prohibited Expansion. A Nonconforming
Structure shall not be expanded or increased as of the effective date
of this UDC except as provided in subsection 3 below.
2.
Conforming Use in a Nonconforming
Structure. Where a conforming use is located in a Nonconforming Structure,
the use may be changed to another conforming use.
3.
Expansion of Nonconforming Structures.
An expansion of a Nonconforming Structure is allowed in accordance
with the following.
a.
Buildings or structures that do not
conform to the area regulations or development standards in this UDC
but where the uses are deemed conforming shall not increase the gross
floor area greater than ten (10) percent from the date when the building
became nonconforming.
i.
In Form Based Districts and the Historic
Overlay District, buildings may be expanded, however any addition
must meet the build-to zone requirements. The addition does not have
to meet the build-to percentage for the lot.
ii. In Form Based Districts
and the Historic Overlay District, new buildings may be placed on
a lot or site with an existing building on it that does not meet the
build-to requirement, all new buildings and additions must be placed
in the build-to one until the build-to percentage for the lot has
been met.
(a) In cases where a phasing
plan showing intent to conform has been submitted to and accepted
by the Planning Director this requirement may be modified.
b.
The expansion must be conforming.
4.
Restoration of Nonconforming Structures.
a.
Total Destruction. If a Nonconforming
Structure is destroyed by fire, the elements, or other cause, it may
not be rebuilt except to conform to the provisions of this UDC.
b.
Partial Destruction. In the case
of partial destruction of a Nonconforming Structure less than fifty-one
(51) percent of its total appraised value as determined by the Appraisal
District, reconstruction will be permitted, but the existing square
footage or function of the Nonconforming Structure cannot be expanded.
5.
Movement of Nonconforming Structures.
Nonconforming Structures shall not be relocated within the existing
lot or to a different lot.
6.
Completion of Structures. Nothing
herein contained shall require any change in the plans, construction,
or designated use of the following:
a.
Approved Building. A building or
structure for which a building permit has been issued or a site plan
approved prior to adoption of this UDC.
b.
Building in the Approval Process.
A building or structure for which a complete Application for a building
permit was accepted by the Building Official on or before the effective
date of these regulations, provided however, that such building permit
shall comply with all applicable ordinances in effect on the date
such Application was filed.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017; Ordinance 2022-24 adopted 9/20/2022)
A.
City Council Initiation of Amortization
Case. Only the City Council, by majority vote, may request that the
Board of Adjustment consider establishing a compliance date for a
Nonconforming Use.
B.
Board of Adjustment Decision of Amortization
Case.
1.
Per the authorization of City Council
(A above), the Board of Adjustment may require the discontinuance
of a Nonconforming Use under any plan whereby the full value of the
use’s structure and facilities can be amortized within a definite
period of time, taking into consideration the general character of
the neighborhood and the necessity for all property to conform to
the UDC regulations.
2.
All actions to discontinue a Nonconforming
Use shall be taken with due regard for the property rights of the
persons affected when considered in the light of the public welfare
and the character of the area surrounding the nonconforming use and
the conservation and preservation of property.
C.
Public Hearing Process. Upon receiving
a request under A above from the City Council, staff shall schedule
the First Public Hearing before the Board. The Board may establish
a compliance date only after holding two separate public hearings.
1.
First Public Hearing. The Board shall
hold a public hearing to determine whether continued operation of
the Nonconforming Use will have a significant adverse effect on nearby
properties. Only if, based on the evidence presented at the public
hearing, the Board determines that continued operation of the Nonconforming
Use will have a significant adverse effect on nearby properties, it
shall schedule a second public hearing to establish a compliance date
for the Nonconforming Use. In determining whether the continued operation
will have a significant adverse effect on nearby properties, the Board
shall consider the following factors:
a.
The character of the surrounding
neighborhood.
b.
The degree of incompatibility of
the use with the zoning district in which it is located.
c.
The manner in which the use is being
conducted.
d.
The hours of operation of the use.
e.
The extent to which continued operation
of the use may threaten public health or safety.
f.
The environmental impacts of the
use’s operation, including but not limited to the impacts of
noise, glare, dust, and odor.
g.
The extent to which public disturbances
and nuisances may be created or perpetuated by continued operation
of the use.
h.
The extent to which traffic or parking
problems may be created or perpetuated by continued operation of the
use.
i.
Any other factors relevant to the
issue of whether continued operation of the use will adversely affect
nearby properties.
j.
To the extent the Nonconforming Use
impacts the value and marketability of the abutting and surrounding
properties or neighborhood.
k.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the Board cannot amortize a use described in Subsection
2.10.02. E.2 unless it finds that the use is a nuisance or that the use presents a risk of imminent destruction of property or injury to persons.
2.
Second Public Hearing.
a.
If the Board has determined in the
first public hearing that the Nonconforming Use has an adverse effect
on nearby properties, it shall hold a second public hearing to set
a date for compliance. The Board shall, in accordance with the law,
provide a compliance date for the Nonconforming Use under a plan whereby
the owner’s actual investment in the use before the time that
the use became nonconforming can be amortized within a definite time
period. The following factors must be considered by the Board in determining
a reasonable amortization period:
i.
The owner’s capital investment
in structures, fixed equipment, and other assets (excluding inventory
and other assets that may be feasibly transferred to another site)
on the property before the time the use became nonconforming.
ii. Any costs that are directly
attributable to the establishment of compliance date, including demolition
expenses, relocation expenses, termination of leases, and discharge
of mortgages.
iii. Any return on investment
since inception of the use, including net income and depreciation.
iv. The anticipated annual
recovery of investment, including net income and depreciation.
v.
A reasonable closeout and termination
period for the nonconforming use.
b.
If the Board, at the first public
hearing, requests financial documentation or records from the owner
relating to the factors listed directly above, the owner shall provide
said documents or records at least thirty (30) days before the second
public hearing. If the owner does not provide said documentation,
the Board is authorized to make its determination of a compliance
date based upon any reasonably available public records as well as
public testimony at the hearing. Failure by owner to provide the requested
financial documents and records shall not prevent the Board from setting
a compliance date.
D.
Ceasing Operations. If the Board
establishes a compliance date for a Nonconforming Use, the use must
cease operations on that date and it may not operate thereafter unless
it becomes a conforming use.
E.
Definitions. For purposes of this
subsection, "owner" means the owner of the Nonconforming Use at the
time of the Board’s determination of a compliance date for the
Nonconforming Use.
F.
Finality of Decisions.
1.
Decisions that cannot be Immediately
Appealed. A decision by the Board that the continued operation of
a Nonconforming Use will have a significant adverse effect on neighboring
property and the Board’s decision to schedule a second public
hearing to establish a compliance date are not final decisions and
cannot be immediately appealed.
2.
Decision to Deny a Request to Establish
a Compliance Date. A decision by the Board to deny a request to establish
a compliance date is final unless appealed to state court within ten
(10) calendar days in accordance with Chapter 211 of the Local Government
Code.
3.
Decision Setting a Compliance Date.
A decision by the Board setting a compliance date is final unless
appealed to state court within ten (10) calendar days in accordance
with Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code.
(Ordinance
2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)