A.
Purpose and Applicability.
1.
Purpose. The purpose of the Alternative Compliance process is
to allow for different standards that are in agreement with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and will produce a substantially equivalent effect
or enhanced level of results as intended by the original development
standards.
2.
Applicability.
a.
A request for Alternative Compliance from certain provisions,
as specifically cited within this UDC, may be submitted for review
and approval along with the Site Plan for a project, or along with
the project’s initial development Application (as applicable
for the project).
b.
All Alternative Compliance requests shall be clearly delineated
graphically or in narrative format, as appropriate, on the Site Plan
(or on the project’s initial development Application), including
a reference to the specific section within this UDC that allows consideration
of such alternative standard(s).
c.
The applicable zoning district standards for a project shall
not be reduced or varied using the Alternative Compliance process
unless such standard(s) is specifically cited as qualifying for Alternative
Compliance consideration in its respective section of this UDC.
B.
Alternative Compliance Evaluation Criteria. The proposed standard(s)
shall meet all of the following criteria:
1.
Be in agreement with and promote the recommendations and policies
within the Comprehensive Plan;
2.
Does not reduce a standard unless it is, to the greatest extent
practical, equally mitigated or improved by increasing standards of
other requirements; and
3.
Does not modify the land uses allowed in the zoning district
in which the subject property is located.
C.
Alternative Compliance Allowed.
1.
The City is not obligated to grant Alternative Compliance for
any Application.
2.
Alternative Compliance shall be granted only as indicated for
each regulation.
3.
Alternative Compliance shall be considered for approval as indicated
in Table 31. Alternative Compliance Decision-Makers:
Table 31. Alternative Compliance Decision-Makers
|
---|
Section
|
Regulation
|
Director of Planning
|
Planning and Zoning Commission
|
City Council
|
---|
2.07.03.
|
Modified Area Regulations and Standards
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
2.08.07
|
Building to Lot Width in the Build-to
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
2.09.01.
|
Landscaping
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
2.09.02.
|
Fencing and Screening
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
2.09.03.
|
Off-Street Parking
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
2.09.05.
|
Building Materials
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
2.09.11.
|
Nonresidential Design
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
2.10.11.
|
Development in the Rural Heritage Overlay (O-R) District
|
Recommend
|
Decide
|
Appeal
|
(Ordinance 2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017; Ordinance
2022-24 adopted 9/20/2022)
A.
Types of Appeals. The following are the types of Zoning Regulation
Appeals contained within this UDC.
1.
Appeal of a City Administrative or Interpretative Decision.
a.
Any person, department, board, or bureau of the City affected
by any administrative officer acting pursuant to the UDC’s Zoning
Regulations shall appeal to the Board of Adjustment.
b.
In exercising the Board of Adjustment’s authority herein,
the Board of Adjustment may reverse or affirm, in whole or in part,
or modify the City administrative official’s order, requirement,
decision, or determination from which an appeal is taken and make
the correct order, requirement, decision, or determination, and for
that purpose the Board of Adjustment has the same authority as the
City’s administrative official.
c.
Public hearings shall be held in accordance with 2.10.04. Public
Hearings and Notification Requirements.
2.
Appeal to the City Council of a Zoning Vested Rights Petition
Decision (see 2.11.05. F.4).
3.
Appeal to District Court of a decision of the City Council or
Board of Adjustment. Any person, department, board, or bureau of the
City affected by a decision of the City Council or Board of Adjustment
may appeal to District Court.
B.
Appeals Procedure to the City Council or Board of Adjustment.
1.
Timing and Fee. Appeal to the City Council or Board of Adjustment
shall be taken within ten (10) calendar days from the date of the
decision by filing with the Responsible Official from whom the appeal
is taken and with the City Secretary a notice of appeal specifying
the grounds thereof, and by paying a filing fee at the office of the
City Secretary at the time the notice is filed.
2.
Transmission of Record. The Responsible Official from whom the
appeal is taken shall forthwith transmit to the Board of Adjustment
all the papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed
from was taken.
3.
Stays of Proceedings. An appeal stays all proceedings in furtherance
of the action appealed from, unless the Responsible Official certifies
to the City Council or Board of Adjustment, that by reason of facts
stated in the certificate a stay would, in the Responsible Official’s
opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property.
C.
Appeals Procedure to District Court.
1.
Timing. An appeal from any action, decision, ruling, judgment,
or order of the City Council or Board of Adjustment may be taken by
any person or persons, jointly or severally, or any taxpayer; or any
officer, department, board, or bureau of the City to the district
or county court by filing notice of appeal with the City Secretary
and with the Board of Adjustment within ten (10) calendar days from
the filing of the decision of the board, which notice shall specify
the grounds of such appeal.
2.
Transmission of Record. Upon filing of the notice of appeal
as herein provided, the court may grant a writ of certiorari directed
to the board in this event, the City Council or Board of Adjustment
shall transmit to the court clerk and the petitioner the original
or certified copy of the papers constituting the record in the case,
together with the order, decision, or ruling.
3.
Stays of Proceedings. An appeal to the district court from the
City Council or Board of Adjustment stays all proceedings in furtherance
of the action appealed from, unless the mayor or chairman of the Board
of Adjustment, from which the appeal is taken certifies to the court
clerk, after the notice of appeal shall have been filed, that by reasons
of fact stated in the certificate, a stay would, in her/his opinion,
cause imminent peril to life or property.
D.
Fees. All fees for all types of Applications, forms, plans,
notifications, appeals, and petitions required under this UDC shall
be established by the City Council within the Fee Schedule.
(Ordinance 2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Purpose.
1.
The Board of Adjustment is authorized in specific cases to grant
a Zoning Variance from the Zoning Regulation terms, standards, and
criteria that pertains to an allowed use within a zoning district.
2.
A Zoning Variance is authorized by this UDC when such cases
are shown not to be contrary to the public interest if, owing to special
conditions, a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance
will result in an undue hardship and so that the spirit of the ordinance
shall be observed and substantial justice done; provided, however,
the Board of Adjustment shall have no power to authorize a Zoning
Variance provided in E below.
B.
Zoning Variance Applicability. The Board of Adjustment is authorized
in specific cases to grant a Zoning Variance from the following regulations
to prevent undue hardships.
1.
Open space (yard) dimensions.
C.
Granting Authority.
1.
Undue Hardship Shall Exist. The Board of Adjustment may authorize
a Zoning Variance from these Zoning Regulations when, due to special
conditions, an undue hardship will result from requiring compliance.
2.
Harmony with the UDC’s General Purpose and Intent Shall
Exist. A Zoning Variance may be granted only when the Zoning Variance
is not contrary to the public interest and is in harmony with the
general purpose and intent of this UDC so that the public health,
safety, and welfare may be secured and that substantial justice may
be done.
3.
Zoning Variance Processing and Review. The Director of Planning
shall process and review a Zoning Variance.
4.
Board of Adjustment Conditions of Approval. In granting a Zoning
Variance, the Board of Adjustment shall prescribe only conditions
that it deems necessary for, or desirable to, the public interest.
5.
Board of Adjustment Considerations. In making the findings within
D below, the Board of Adjustment shall take into account:
a.
The nature of the proposed use of the land involved,
b.
Existing uses of land in the vicinity,
c.
The number of persons who will reside or work within the proposed
use, and
d.
The probable effect such Zoning Variance will have upon traffic
conditions and upon the public health, safety, convenience and welfare
of the community.
e.
Such findings of the Board of Adjustment, together with the
specific facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated
into the official minutes of the Board of Adjustment meeting at which
such Zoning Variance is granted.
D.
Criteria for Zoning Variance Approval. No Zoning Variance shall
be granted without first having given public notice and having held
a public hearing on the Zoning Variance request in accordance with
2.10.04. Public Hearings and Notification Requirements and unless
the Board of Adjustment finds all the following criteria are met.
1.
Unique Circumstances. That there are special circumstances or
conditions affecting the land involved such that the application of
the UDC’s provisions would deprive the Applicant of the reasonable
use of his/her land.
2.
Minimum Necessary Relief Required to Alleviate the Undue Hardship.
The Zoning Variance, if granted, would be the minimum necessary relief
required to alleviate the undue hardship.
3.
Preservation of Property Rights. That the Zoning Variance is
necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right of the Applicant.
4.
No Substantial Detriment to the Public Good. That the granting
of the Zoning Variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety or welfare, impair the purposes and intent of this UDC and
the Comprehensive Plan or be injurious to other property within the
area.
5.
Orderly Use of Land. That the granting of the Zoning Variance
will not have the effect of preventing the orderly use of other land
within the area in accordance with the provisions of this UDC.
6.
Finding of Undue Hardship. In order to grant a Zoning Variance,
the Board of Adjustment must make findings that an undue hardship
exists, using the following criteria:
a.
That literal enforcement of the controls will create an undue
hardship or practical difficulty in the development of the affected
property; and
b.
That the situation causing the hardship or difficulty is neither
self-imposed nor generally affecting all or most properties in the
same zoning district; and
c.
That the relief sought will not injure the permitted use of
adjacent conforming property; and
d.
That the granting of a Zoning Variance will be in harmony with
the spirit and purpose of these regulations.
e.
Financial hardship alone is not an "undue hardship" if the property
can be used, meeting the requirements of the zoning district in which
the property is located.
E.
Limitations on the Authority of Board of Adjustment to Grant
Zoning Variances.
1.
Land Use Zoning Variance. The Board of Adjustment may not grant
a Zoning Variance authorizing a land use other than those permitted
in the district for which the Zoning Variance is sought, except as
specifically provided for in this UDC.
2.
Specific Use Permit Provision. The Board of Adjustment shall
have no power to grant or modify provisions of a SUP authorized under
2.10.09. Specific Use Permit (SUP) Regulations and Procedures.
3.
Zoning Amendments.
a.
The Board of Adjustment shall have no power to grant Zoning
Text and Map Amendments.
b.
In the event that a request for a Zoning Text Amendment or Zoning
Map Amendment (Rezoning) is pending before the Planning and Zoning
Commission or the City Council, the Board shall neither here nor grant
any Zoning Variance with respect to the subject property until final
disposition of the Zoning Text Amendment or Zoning Map Amendment (Rezoning)
by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council.
4.
Pending Action.
a.
The Board of Adjustment shall not grant a Zoning Variance for
any parcel of property or portion thereof upon which a required Site
Plan or any Plat is pending on the agenda of the Planning and Zoning
Commission or the City Council.
b.
All administrative and procedural remedies available to the
Applicant shall have been exhausted prior to hearing by the Board
of Adjustment.
F.
Concurring Vote of 75 Percent Required. Pursuant to Texas Local
Government Code 211.009.(c), the concurring vote of seventy-five (75)
percent of the members of the Board of Adjustment is necessary to
grant a Zoning Variance.
(Ordinance 2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Purpose. The Board of Adjustment is authorized to hear and decide
a Zoning Special Exception to the Zoning Regulations which are not
permitted by right in a particular district because of potential adverse
effect, but which if controlled in the particular instance as to its
relationship to the neighborhood and to the general welfare, may be
permitted by the Board of Adjustment, where specifically authorized
by D below, and in accordance with the substantive and procedural
standards of the UDC.
B.
Zoning Special Exception Defined. A Zoning Special Exception
is an allowed variation from the Zoning Regulations, but is differentiated
from a Zoning Variance as the term is used in this UDC by the following:
1.
No Hardship Required. A Zoning Special Exception does not require
a finding of an undue hardship.
2.
Specifically Allowed and Pre-Determined by the UDC. Approval
of a Zoning Special Exception by the Board of Adjustment is specifically
provided for and defined in this UDC.
C.
Requests for a Zoning Special Exception.
1.
The Board of Adjustment may grant a Zoning Special Exception
in accordance to the provisions of D below upon written request of
the property owner.
2.
The Director of Planning shall process and review a Zoning Special
Exception.
D.
Zoning Special Exception Authorized. When, in the Board of Adjustment’s
judgment, the public convenience and welfare will be substantially
served and the appropriate use of the neighboring property will not
be substantially injured, the Board of Adjustment may, in specific
cases, after public notice and public hearing (see 2.10.04. Public
Hearings and Notification Requirements) and subject to appropriate
conditions and safeguards, authorize the following Zoning Special
Exceptions to the regulations herein established:
1.
Reduction in the required number of parking spaces if the Board
of Adjustment determines sufficient parking exists or is not necessary
for the specified location.
2.
Adjust any numerical standard by ten (10) percent.
3.
Antenna Location Waiver as outlined in 4.03.07.
E.
The Board may Impose Conditions. In granting Zoning Special
Exceptions, the Board may impose such conditions as are necessary
to protect adjacent property owners and to ensure the public health,
safety and general welfare, including but not limited to conditions
specifying the period during which the nonconforming use may continue
to operate or exist before being brought into conformance with the
provisions of this UDC.
(Ordinance 2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)
A.
Purpose. In accordance with the Texas Local Government
Code, Chapter 245 or successor statute, the purpose of
a Zoning Vested Rights Petition is to determine whether one or more
standards of this UDC should not be applied to a plan or Application,
or whether certain permits are subject to expiration.
B.
Applicability of a Zoning Vested Rights Petition.
1.
Any Application. A Zoning Vested Rights Petition may be filed
for an Application, permit, or plan required under Section 2. Zoning
Regulations.
2.
Prohibited Joint Submission. A Zoning Vested Rights Petition
cannot be submitted by an Applicant along with submission of a request
for a Zoning Vested Rights Petition to this UDC, a Zoning Map Amendment
(Rezoning), or any other request for a legislative decision by the
City Council.
3.
Land and Use upon Annexation. Vested rights in land use upon
annexation shall be governed by Texas Local Government Code, Section
43.002, as amended.
C.
Petition Submission.
1.
Filing.
a.
A Zoning Vested Rights Petition shall be submitted to the City’s
Responsible Official in accordance with the Texas Local
Government Code, Chapter 245 or successor statute.
b.
Upon receipt of a Zoning Vested Rights Petition, the Responsible
Official shall consult with the City Attorney.
2.
Stay of Further Proceedings. Submission of such petition shall
stay further proceedings on the related Application until a final
decision is reached on the Zoning Vested Rights Petition.
D.
Petition Requirements. The Zoning Vested Rights Petition shall
allege that the petitioner has a vested right that requires the City
to review and decide the Application under standards in effect prior
to the effective date of the currently applicable standards. The petition
shall include, at a minimum, the following information and documents:
1.
Basic Owner Information. The name, mailing address, phone number
and fax number of the property owner (or the property owner’s
duly authorized agent).
2.
Identification of Property and "Project".
a.
Identification of the property for which the property owner
claims a vested right.
b.
Identification of the "project," as that term is defined in
Chapter 245 at 245.001.(3).
c.
A chronology of the history of the "project," with special emphasis
on facts establishing that the project was in progress on or commenced
after September 1, 1997, as required by Chapter 245 at 245.003;
3.
Narrative Description for Purpose of Petition. A narrative description
of the grounds for the petition, including a statement as to whether
the petition asserts a vested right related to a specific regulation
or to an entire project.
4.
Identification of Regulations.
a.
Identification of all City regulations in effect at the time
the original Application for the permit was filed that (a) the owner
contends are vested and (b) the owner contends controls the approval,
disapproval, or conditional approval of an Approval for a permit,
pursuant to Chapter 245 at 245.002(a) and (b).
b.
Identification of all City regulations, with particularity and
in detail, that the property owner contends do not apply to the project
due to the vested rights provided the property owner by Chapter 245.
i.
Global references to a particular ordinance, or set of criteria,
may be deemed insufficient and the City may consider the request for
a vested rights determination to be incomplete and, hence, not subject
to a staff determination at that time.
c.
Identification of any current City regulations which petitioner
agrees can be applied to the Application at issue.
5.
Copies of Applications. A copy of each approved or pending Application
which is the basis for the contention that the City may not apply
current standards to the Application which is the subject of the petition.
6.
Submittal Date of First Application. The submittal date of the
first Application that began the vesting process (i.e., first permit
in the series of permits required for the project), as identified
in 2.10.01. Applicability, Completeness, and Expiration.
7.
Submittal Date of Subsequent Application. If applicable, the
submittal dates of subsequent Applications for the permits for the
project.
8.
Narrative Description of How Current Regulations Affect Proposed
Use. A narrative description of how the Application of current regulations
affect proposed use of the land, landscaping or tree preservation,
or park dedication, lot size, lot dimensions, coverage or building
size shown on the Application for which the petition is filed.
9.
Copies of Prior Vested Rights Determinations. A copy of any
prior vested rights determination involving the same land.
10.
Benchmarking Project Progress for Expiring Permits or Applications.
Whenever the petitioner alleges that a permit or Application subject
to expiration should not be terminated, a description of the events
constituting progress toward completion of the project for which the
permit subject to expiration was approved.
E.
Validity and Expiration of Different "Permits" for Vesting Purposes.
1.
Required Plan Validity and Expiration.
a.
Required Plan. A Site Plan, Specific Use Permit’s Site
Plan, or Planned Development (PD)’s Site Plan, shall be considered
a "permit" as described by State law in Chapter 245.005, as amended, of the Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) and herein
be referred to as "Required Plan."
b.
Appropriate Approval Required for a "Permit". A Required Plan
shall not be considered a "permit" unless it has been approved by
the appropriate entity before the effective date of these regulations,
or an Application for a Required Plan is complete as of the effective
date of these regulations.
c.
Required Plan Expiration. Any approved Required Plan shall be
deemed expired two (2) years from the date on which the Required Plan
was originally approved by the appropriate entity if no progress (see
d below) has been made toward completion of the project.
d.
Progress Benchmarks. The term "progress" shall be as defined
based on TLGC Chapter 245.005 as follows:
i.
Plans for construction and an Application for a building permit
for at least one of the buildings on the approved Required Plan are
submitted within two (2) years following approval of the Required
Plan;
ii. A good-faith attempt is made to file with the City
an Application for a permit necessary to begin or continue towards
completion of the project;
iii. Costs have been incurred for developing the project
including, without limitation, costs associated with roadway, utility,
and other infrastructure facilities designed to serve, in whole or
in part, the project (but exclusive of land acquisition) in the aggregate
amount of five percent (5%) of the most recent appraised market value
of the real property on which the project is located;
iv. Fiscal security is posted with the City to ensure
performance of an obligation required by the City; or
v.
Utility connection fees for the project have been paid to the
City.
e.
Required Plan Expiration. If one of the items listed in d.i
through d.v above is not accomplished within the two (2) year period,
the approved Required Plan shall expire upon the second (2nd) anniversary
of its approval by the appropriate entity, and shall become null and
void.
f.
Required Plan Extension and Reinstatement Petition.
i.
Prior to the expiration of a Required Plan, the Applicant may
petition the City (in writing) to extend the Required Plan approval.
ii. The Director of Planning shall be the Responsible
Official for processing and review of the Application.
iii. Such petition shall be recommended for approval
or denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and shall be granted
approval or denied by the City Council.
iv. If no petition is submitted, then the Required
Plan shall be deemed to have expired and shall become null and void.
(a) Any new request for Required Plan approval thereafter
shall be deemed a "new permit", and shall be submitted with a new
Application Form, with a new filing fee, and with new plans and materials
in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section.
(b) The new request shall also be reviewed for compliance
with the ordinances and regulations in effect at the time the new
Application is made.
v.
In determining whether to grant a request for extension, the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall take into account
the following:
(a) The ability of the property owner to comply with
any conditions attached to the original approval, and
(b) The extent to which development regulations would
apply to the Required Plan at that point in time.
2.
Building Permit Site Plan Validity and Expiration. A Site Plan
required as part of a building permit Application shall be considered
a "permit" as described by State law in Chapter 245.005, as amended, of the Texas Local Government Code (TLGC).
a.
Building Permit Site Plan Expiration. Any approved Building
Permit Site Plan shall be deemed expired two (2) years from the date
on which the Building Permit Site Plan was approved if no progress
has been made toward completion of the project.
b.
Progress Benchmarks. The term "progress" shall be as defined
based on TLGC Chapter 245.005 as follows:
i.
Plans for construction and an Application for a building permit
for at least one of the buildings on the approved Building Permit
Site Plan are submitted within two (2) years following approval of
the Building Permit Site Plan.
ii. A good-faith attempt is made to file with the City
an Application for a permit necessary to begin or continue towards
completion of the project;
iii. Costs have been incurred for developing the project
including, without limitation, costs associated with roadway, utility,
and other infrastructure facilities designed to serve, in whole or
in part, the project (but exclusive of land acquisition) in the aggregate
amount of five percent (5%) of the most recent appraised market value
of the real property on which the project is located;
iv. Fiscal security is posted with the City to ensure
performance of an obligation required by the City; or
v.
Utility connection fees or impact fees for the project have
been paid to the City.
c.
Expiration. If one of the items listed in b.i through b.v above
is not accomplished within the two (2) year period, then the approved
Building Permit Site Plan shall expire and shall become null and void.
d.
Building Permit Site Plan Extension and Reinstatement Petition.
i.
Prior to the expiration of a Building Permit Site Plan, the
Applicant may petition the City (in writing) to extend the Building
Permit Site Plan approval.
ii. The Director of Planning shall be the Responsible
Official for processing and review of the Application.
iii. Such petition shall be recommended for approval
or denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and shall be granted
approval or denial by the City Council.
iv. If no petition is submitted, then the Building
Permit Site Plan shall be deemed to have expired and shall become
null and void.
(a) Any new request for Building Permit Site Plan approval
shall be deemed a "new permit", and shall be submitted with a new
Application Form, with a new filing fee, and with new plans and materials
in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Section.
(b) The new request shall also be reviewed for compliance
with the ordinances and regulations in effect at the time the new
Application is made.
v.
In determining whether to grant a request for extension, the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall take into account
the following reasons for the lapse.
(a) The ability of the property owner to comply with
any conditions attached to the original approval, and
(b) The extent to which development regulations would
apply to the Building Permit Site Plan at that point in time.
3.
Planned Development Master Plan - Validity and Expiration. In
conformance with TLGC Chapter 245, as amended,
the Applicant shall retain the following additional rights related
to an approved Planned Development Master Plan.
a.
Preliminary Plat Submittal within Two (2) Years Required.
i.
An Application for a Preliminary Plat shall be submitted for
approval within two (2) years of the date of approval of a Planned
Development Master Plan, unless otherwise provided in the PD adopting
ordinance.
ii. If a Preliminary Plat consistent with the Planned
Development Master Plan is not submitted within such period, the Planned
Development Master Plan shall expire.
b.
Expiration of an Approved Planned Development Master Plan.
i.
Expiration of an approved Planned Development Master Plan (based
on a above) shall result in suspension of the ability to submit a
Preliminary Plat related to the original Planned Development Master
Plan.
ii. A new Planned Development Master Plan must be submitted
before the development process can continue.
c.
Expiration of an Approved Preliminary Plat.
i.
The expiration of an approved Preliminary Plat shall be governed
by the provisions of Section 3. Subdivision Regulations and Development
Standards and this UDC.
ii. If a required Development Application (e.g., Preliminary
Plat, Final Plat, building permit) is submitted within the two (2)
year period, but such Development Application subsequently expires,
the associated Planned Development Master Plan shall also expire.
4.
Ability to Retain the Rights to the Planned Development (PD)
Project. In conformance with TLGC Chapter 245, as amended, the Applicant shall retain the following rights related
to a proposed Planned Development (PD) following submittal and approved
of a Planned Development Master Plan.
a.
Ability to Submit Applications for Five (5) Years.
i.
The Applicant shall retain the ability to submit a new Planned
Development Master Plan for a period of five (5) years following the
original Planned Development Master Plan approval.
ii. Such new Planned Development Master Plan may only
be for a substantially similar PD project.
iii. However, any such new Planned Development Master
Plan shall adhere to any and all new standards and regulations that
the City has adopted in relation to a Planned Development Master Plan
or any other PD Application requirements.
b.
Expiration of Project in Five (5) Years. Any PD project for
which no Preliminary Plat has been submitted for a period of five
(5) years following the approval of the related Planned Development
Master Plan shall expire on the last day of that five (5) year period.
c.
Planning and Zoning Commission Consideration.
i.
After such five (5) year period has ended and the project expires,
the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider whether the undeveloped
land within the PD District should be changed to another zoning classification
in accordance with the procedures for a zoning amendment pursuant
to 2.10.03. Zoning Text and Map Amendments.
ii. The Commission thereafter shall recommend to the
City Council whether the right to submit a Preliminary Plat or other
Development Application for the same PD project should be reinstated,
or whether the property should be rezoned to another classification.
d.
City Council Consideration.
i.
The Commission’s recommendation (as outlined in c above)
shall be considered by the City Council in accordance with procedures
for a zoning amendment pursuant to 2.10.03. Zoning Text and Map Amendments.
ii. The Council shall determine whether the right to
submit the Preliminary Plat or other Development Application for the
same PD project should be reinstated, or whether the property should
be rezoned to another classification.
iii. In making such determination, the Council shall
consider the following factors:
(a) Whether the Planned Development (PD) remains consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan;
(b) Whether the uses authorized in the Planned Development
(PD) are compatible with existing and planned land uses adjacent to
the site;
(c) Whether there are extenuating circumstances justifying
the failure to submit a Preliminary Plat or other Development Application
during the applicable time period; and
(d) Whether rezoning the property to another classification
constitutes confiscation of a vested property right or deprives the
owner of the economically viable use of the land.
e.
Council Action. Upon the above subsections occurring, the City
Council may take the following actions:
i.
Reinstate the right to submit the Preliminary Plat or other
Development Application for the original PD project within a certain
time period, subject to any conditions that may be appropriate to
ensure that significant progress will be made toward development of
land within the PD district;
ii. Modify the PD district regulations applicable to
the property; or
iii. Repeal the PD district for portions of the property
and zone such property to another zoning district classification.
F.
Decision of a Zoning Vested Rights Petition.
1.
Review of a Zoning Vested Rights Petition. The Responsible Official
shall promptly forward the owner’s vested rights request, along
with any supporting information or documentation provided along with
the request, to the Director of Planning and City Attorney for their
respective reviews.
2.
Decision on a Zoning Vested Rights Petition.
a.
The Director of Planning, after consultation with the City Attorney,
shall issue a final administrative determination of whether a vested
right exists in relation to the project, and shall identify, with
particularity, all claims for vested rights that have been granted
and all claims for vested rights that have been denied.
b.
The Director of Planning shall issue a final administrative
determination with thirty (30) business days from the receipt of the
Responsible Official.
3.
Vesting Pre-Determination Conference. Prior to rendering the
final determination, the Director of Planning may request a pre-determination
conference with the owner to discuss the owner’s vested rights
claim and to ensure that the nature of the claim is fully and completely
understood by the Director of Planning prior to a final determination
being rendered.
4.
Appeal to the Council of a Decision on a Zoning Vested Rights
Petition.
a.
If the property owner or the City Council believes that the
Director of Planning’s vested rights determination is in error,
the property owner or City Council shall have the right to appeal
within thirty (30) business days of such determination to the City
Council, which will have jurisdiction to hear and decide the appeal
pursuant to this UDC and Chapter 211 of the Texas Local
Government Code.
b.
The property owner may also request the Board of Adjustment
to grant a Zoning Variance from the regulations at issue under the
same standards governing Zoning Variances for other matters, as set
forth in this UDC or Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government
Code.
G.
Judicial Review.
1.
Should the property owner or any aggrieved person be dissatisfied
with the actions of the City Council, they may avail themselves of
all legal remedies to review the decision as set forth in Section 211.011 of the Texas Local Government Code.
H.
Binding Determination.
1.
The Director of Planning’s final determination, if not
appealed to the City Council within thirty (30) business days, shall
be immediately filed in the City’s files related to the project
and the determination shall be considered binding upon the City and
the property owner for the duration of the project.
2.
Similarly, any decision by the City Council regarding a vested
right claim shall be filed in the City’s files related to the
project and the determination shall be considered binding upon the
City and the property owner for the duration of the project.
3.
Notwithstanding the binding nature of the Director of Planning’s
final determination and any ruling by the City Council, the City and
the property owner may, at any time, enter into a development agreement
that, to the extent authorized by law, modifies the final determination
and the applicable development regulations to be applied to the project.
I.
Action on Petition and Order.
1.
Action on the Petition. On a petition or appeal, the Director
of Planning or City Council may take any of the following actions:
a.
Deny the relief requested in the petition, and direct that the
Application shall be reviewed and decided under currently applicable
standards;
b.
Grant the relief requested in the petition, and direct that
the Application be reviewed and decided in accordance with the standards
contained in identified prior regulations; or
c.
Grant the relief requested in part, and direct that certain
identified current standards be applied to the Application, while
standards contained in identified prior regulations also shall be
applied.
(Ordinance 2017-13 adopted 10/2/2017)