A.
The city council finds that aggressive panhandling for money or anything of monetary value directed at residents of and visitors to the City of Roseville threatens public safety, impairs commercial activity and harms public welfare. Aggressive panhandling interferes with the public’s inherent right to use and enjoy public places without fear of intimidation caused by those persons who harass others by asking for or demanding money or goods. Such conduct can undermine economic vitality by inconveniencing patrons and thus reduces shopping activity within the city. Such conduct can discourage visitors and prospective customers from coming to the City of Roseville for business, shopping or recreation because it creates an atmosphere of discomfort and fear.
B.
The city council further finds that the presence of individuals who panhandle at or near banks, automated teller machines, or in public transportation vehicles is especially troublesome because of the enhanced fear of crime in those confined environments. Likewise, persons panhandled in public at night have an enhanced fear of crime. Such activities carry with them an implicit threat to both persons and property.
C.
The activity of panhandling occupants of vehicles distracts drivers from their primary duty to watch traffic and pedestrians and to be alert for potential hazards in the roadway, to observe all traffic control signals, signs or warnings, and to be prepared to move through the city’s streets and intersections.
D.
This chapter is not intended to limit any persons from exercising their constitutional right to solicit funds, picket, protest or engage in other constitutionally protected activity. Rather, its goal is to protect citizens from the fear and intimidation accompanying certain kinds of panhandling and solicitation.
(Ord. 4417 § 2, 2006; Ord. 5129 § 1, 2012)