This Chapter regulates new and existing structures and land uses in the combining districts established by Section
20-20.020 (Zoning Map and Zoning Districts). The provisions of this Chapter provide guidance for development in addition to the standards and regulations of the primary zoning districts, where important site, environmental, safety, compatibility, or design issues require particular attention in project planning.
(Ord. 3677 § 1, 2004)
The provisions of this Chapter apply to proposed land uses and
development in addition to all other applicable requirements of this
Zoning Code. Any perceived conflict between the provisions of this
Chapter and any other provision of this Zoning Ordinance shall be
resolved in compliance with Section 20-12.020.D (Rules of Interpretation—Conflicting
requirements).
A. Mapping of combining districts. The applicability of any combining district to a specific site is shown by the combining district Zoning Map symbol established by Section
20-20.020 (Zoning Map and Zoning Districts), being appended as a suffix to the symbol for the primary zoning district on the Zoning Map. The combining districts are applied to property through the rezoning process (Chapter
20-64), subject to any specific rezoning Requirements of the applicable combining district.
B. Allowed
land uses, permit requirements, development standards. Except as may
be otherwise provided by this Chapter for a specific combining district:
1. Any
land use normally allowed in the primary zoning district by this Division
may be allowed within a combining district, subject to any additional
requirements of the combining district;
2. Development
and new land uses within a combining district shall obtain the land
use permits required by this Division for the primary zoning district;
and
3. Development
and new land uses within a combining district shall comply with all
applicable development standards of the primary zoning district, except
as modified by this Chapter.
(Ord. 3677 § 1, 2004)
A. Purpose.
The -H combining district is intended to recognize, preserve, and
enhance Santa Rosa's locally designated historic resources.
B. Applicability. The -H combining district shall apply to all properties within designated preservation districts, including both contributing and non-contributing parcels. Additionally, the -H combining district shall apply to all locally designated landmark properties. The -H combining district may be combined with any primary zoning district established by Section
20-20.020 (Zoning Map and zoning districts).
C. Allowed land uses and permit requirements. Any land use normally allowed in the primary zoning district by this Division may be allowed within the -H combining district, subject to the land use permit requirements of the primary district, the procedural requirements of Chapter
20-58 (Historic and Cultural Preservation), and any district specific standards as outlined below.
D. Character
defining elements.
1. Purpose.
Character defining elements are specific to each preservation district
and are intended to identify those physical aspects that represent
the historical significance of the district and are essential to maintaining
and enhancing the unique character of the individual district. On
March 15, 2006, Cultural Heritage Board Resolution No. 209, adopted
character defining elements for the Burbank Gardens, Cherry Street,
Ridgway, McDonald, Olive Park, St. Rose, West End and Railroad Square
Preservation Districts, reflected in the subsections below.
2. Applicability.
The character defining elements provide an outline of the historic
context for each preservation district to project sponsors such as
developers, property owners, architects, and designers. These district
specific frameworks will be used by City staff, boards and commissions,
and the City Council when evaluating project proposals that impact
properties or existing buildings within designated preservation districts.
Although each individual element may not be appropriate to each project,
each project shall enhance the contextual framework of the district.
3. Elements
to consider in all preservation districts include:
a. Architecture.
•
|
Residential structures relate to each other in terms of size,
scale, mass and rhythm.
|
•
|
Buildings in preservation districts utilize traditional building
materials.
|
•
|
In general, buildings do not exceed 35 feet in height.
|
•
|
Houses have articulated, pedestrian-friendly frontages and are
not dominated by garages.
|
•
|
Most houses have front porches.
|
b. Hardscape.
•
|
Residential driveways are generally single wide rather than
double wide.
|
•
|
Concrete sidewalks are scored in one- to two-foot squares.
|
•
|
Traditional light standards are found in each preservation district.
|
c. Landscape.
•
|
Mature landscape predominates in preservation districts.
|
•
|
Landscaping typically does not obscure buildings.
|
d. Site planning.
•
|
Garages and parking are located to the rear of the property.
|
•
|
Houses are typically set back from the sidewalk a minimum of
15 feet.
|
•
|
Houses typically maintain a minimum of five-foot side yard setback.
|
•
|
Each preservation district offers a community-serving facility
within a short walking distance.
|
E. Site planning and development standards. Development within the -H combining district shall comply with the following standards, and the requirements of Chapter
20-58 (Historic and Cultural Preservation). In the event of any conflict between the following standards and those of the primary zoning district, those applicable to the -H combining district shall apply.
1. Processing
Review Procedures. The Processing Review Procedures for Owners of
Historic Properties were adopted by the City Council as Santa Rosa's
local guidelines for alterations to properties within designated preservation
districts or individually designated landmark properties. These guidelines
are referred to in findings for approval of a Landmark Alteration
Permit and provide a basis for objective and consistent decision-making
by the review authority.
2. Secretary
of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for Rehabilitation are the accepted standards used on the national,
state, and local level for assessing the impacts of alterations to
historic resources and their significance. These standards have been
adopted by reference within the Processing Review Procedures, and
consistency with applicable standards is a required finding for approval
of a Landmark Alteration Permit.
3. Height
limits.
a. Purpose. In an effort to preserve and enhance neighborhood character
within designated preservation districts, height limits within the
combining district are more restrictive than the height limits of
the primary zoning district.
b. Height limit. No structure within the -H combining district shall
exceed a maximum height of 35 feet and two stories, except as provided
in Subsection E.3.c.
c. Increased height. A structure may be approved with a height over
35 feet or two stories provided that:
(1) The review authority finds that the increased height does not detract
from the character of the preservation district or any adjacent contributing
properties; and
(2) The review authority may require conditions of approval that pertain
to the placement of screens, the location and type of openings, the
location and projections of sun decks, porches, balconies, patios,
and similar architectural amenities, to enhance or preserve the residential
privacy of the proposed structures and of any adjacent existing or
anticipated residential structures or uses.
4. Setbacks.
a. Purpose. The historic development pattern is a unique and defining
feature in each of the City's preservation districts and on each landmark
property. Standard setback requirements may not be sensitive to such
unique attributes and therefore it is important to allow flexibility
in determining appropriate setbacks to preserve and enhance existing
conditions or character.
b. Applicability. Reduced setbacks may be applied to development within
a designated preservation District or on a designated local landmark.
The reduced setback may be applied to new buildings as well as the
addition or expansion of an existing building.
c. Reduced setbacks. A reduction of setbacks required by the primary
zoning district may be approved provided that:
(1) The review authority first finds that the reduced setback will not
significantly impair the Residential privacy of the proposed structures
or any adjacent existing or anticipated residential structures or
use; and
(2) The review authority first finds that the reduced setback enhances
and protects the historic development pattern of the preservation
district or any adjacent contributing properties and that approving
a reduced setback facilitates a superior project.
F. West
End Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The West End Preservation District was designated by the City Council
on August 13, 1996 (Resolution #22811) after recommendation by the
Cultural Heritage Board on May 28, 1996 (Resolution #0063).
2. Boundaries.
The West End Preservation District is bounded by West 9th Street on
the north; Santa Rosa Creek and West 6th Street on the south; Northwestern
Pacific Railroad tracks on the east; and North Dutton Avenue on the
west. See Figure 2-2.
Figure 2-2—West End Preservation District
|
3. Context
statement. The West End Preservation District is significant for architecture
as a large and reasonably intact 19th and early 20th century working-class
residential district comprised of small houses on the "wrong side
of the tracks," and for its ethnic history as Santa Rosa's large and
long-standing Italian neighborhood. The large 'Italian Town' in and
around the West End district is Santa Rosa's only historic ethnic
neighborhood. Besides representing a good cross section of very modest
residential architecture of the 1870s through the 1940s, the West
End shows traces of its heritage in its rustic landscaping, stonework
and folk art, and the generally handmade character of the home improvements.
The residential development of the District can be seen in the
architectural progression of West 6th, 7th, and 8th Streets. Early
construction can be found on West 6th Street, examples of the late
1890s on West 7th Street, and earth 20th century styles are visible
on West 8th Street. These streets combined with others in the District
are an important part of the historic building fabric. The DeTurk
Winery and the Burris Distillery buildings are important early commercial/industrial
buildings. The DeTurk Round Barn, which is unusual in its design and
one of few in the country, is currently used as a public assembly
facility.
4. Period
of significance. 1870s to1940s.
5. Neighborhood
character. The West End Preservation District is significant as a
predominantly single-family residential neighborhood made up of modest
houses on narrow, deep lots. Although a variety of architectural styles
are found within the neighborhood, as listed below, homes are predominately
bungalows and Queen Anne or Colonial cottages. Although not uniform,
front setbacks are generally similar, with some articulation on any
given blockface.
Commercial buildings including Franco American Bakery, Starks
Steakhouse, Western Farms Center, and community facilities including
CHOPS, DeTurk Round Barn, and DeMeo Park contribute to the character
of the neighborhood.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural style.
•
|
Bungalows.
|
•
|
Colonial cottages
|
•
|
Italianates.
|
•
|
Queen Anne cottages.
|
•
|
Saltboxes.
|
•
|
19th Century vernaculars.
|
•
|
1930s, 1940s and 1950s houses.
|
b. Types of buildings.
•
|
Predominantly single-story.
|
•
|
Two-story.
|
•
|
Predominantly single-family houses.
|
•
|
Duplexes.
|
•
|
Small apartment buildings.
|
•
|
Commercial buildings.
|
•
|
Church.
|
•
|
DeTurk Round Barn.
|
c. Building materials
•
|
Predominantly horizontal lap siding.
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Vertical window orientation.
|
•
|
Narrow but deep lots (typically 40 feet x 120 feet).
|
•
|
Small houses (typically 700 to 1,200 square feet).
|
•
|
Reduced setbacks.
|
•
|
Front yard fences or small retaining walls, if any at all.
|
•
|
Houses generally orient to the street with usable entry porch
or stoop.
|
•
|
Single-car, detached garages are located behind the house, often
close to or on the side property line.
|
•
|
Rustic or informal landscaping.
|
•
|
Sidewalks with planter strips.
|
•
|
Traditional two-foot sidewalk squares within the public right-of-way.
|
•
|
Parks.
|
G. Railroad
Square Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The Railroad Square Preservation District was designated by the Cultural
Heritage Board on November 14, 1990 (Resolution #0026). The Railroad
Square National Register Historic District was listed on the National
Register of Historic Places in 1979.
2. Boundaries.
The Railroad Square Preservation District is bounded by 6th Street
on the north; 3rd Street on the south; U.S. 101 Freeway on the east;
and Santa Rosa Creek on the west. The locally designated Preservation
District encompasses and expands the boundaries of the National Register
District. See Figure 2-3.
Figure 2-3—Railroad Square Preservation District
|
3. Context
statement. The Railroad Square Preservation District is a homogeneous
mixture of building styles and construction techniques, not found
elsewhere in the City, that reflect its commercial development during
the railroad era, and the final onslaught of post World War II freeway
systems which effectively divided the district from the central downtown
area and allowed it to retain its links with transportation systems
of the past. The district maintains most of its original composition
and the commercial storefronts, hotels, and remaining warehouses represent
a fairly accurate snapshot of Railroad Square during the height of
rail travel and commerce and its rebirth after the 1906 earthquake.
Fourth Street, the main thoroughfare through the District, begins
as a tree shaded park located next to a 1904 Railroad Depot (4th Street
and Wilson Street) constructed from locally quarried basalt. The Depot
is one of four such blue basalt buildings located within the District,
all of which are of significant historic and architectural value (Western
Hotel at 10 4th Street, LaRose Hotel at 100 5th Street, and REA Express
Building at 9-11 5th Street). Along 4th Street is a series of one-story
brick commercial buildings built from 1915 to 1925. Adjacent to the
railroad tracks, which form a ribbon through the western end of the
District, is a series of brick warehouses built from 1888 to 1914.
The commercial brick buildings located in the District are of particular
importance because the 1906 and 1969 earthquakes, as well as urban
renewal, destroyed most of those found within Santa Rosa City limits.
4. Period
of significance. 1888 to1923.
5. District
character. Railroad Square is comprised of five distinct architectural
areas which reflect the evolution of this historic commercial district:
west of the tracks with brick warehouses and wooden loading docks
(1888 to 1915); 3rd Street between Wilson and Davis Streets with newer
buildings; South side of 4th Street with predominately painted brick
storefronts built after the 1906 earthquake; and the north side of
4th Street with Mission Revival Style false front buildings built
between 1911 and 1913. The signature blue basalt buildings built between
1903 and 1915 and surrounding Depot Park are the architecturally significant
buildings that qualified the District for its National Register designation.
Existing buildings in the District are typically single-story,
with heights ranging from 22 to 27 feet. The dominant building materials
are brick, painted and unpainted, stone masonry (basalt), and stucco.
The color palette of the district is generally muted. Glass transoms
and large storefront windows are typical of store-fronts. Historic
window types are generally wood, painted metal, or copper.
Roof parapets are found on most commercial storefronts, obstructing
flat or low pitched roofs and screening roof equipment from street
level view. Although the heights of the parapets vary, they are usually
harmonious with adjacent buildings. Windows on the upper façades
are regularly spaced.
Buildings reflect a commercial theme with simple detailing and
human scale. In addition to the commercial brick buildings on the
south side of 4th Street and the four basalt buildings in the district,
common architectural themes are rooted in the Mission Revival and
Spanish Revival architectural styles.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural style.
•
|
Brick warehouses and wooden loading docks.
|
•
|
Painted brick store fronts.
|
•
|
Mission Revival.
|
•
|
Basalt stone buildings.
|
b. Building types.
•
|
Predominantly one- and two-story.
|
•
|
Three- and four-story.
|
•
|
Commercial store fronts.
|
•
|
Hotels.
|
•
|
Warehouses.
|
•
|
Railroad buildings.
|
•
|
Water Tower.
|
c. Building materials.
•
|
Brick – painted and unpainted.
|
•
|
Stone masonry.
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
•
|
Glazed tile decorative detailing.
|
•
|
Glass transoms.
|
•
|
Wood paneling.
|
•
|
Window sashes (wood, painted metal or copper).
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Building placement is at zero setbacks.
|
•
|
Typically constructed at 100 percent lot coverage.
|
•
|
Historic color pallet of the district is generally muted.
|
•
|
Windows on the upper façades are regularly spaced.
|
•
|
Large building façades are divided into multiple storefront
bays.
|
•
|
Storefronts are typically divided into 20-foot wide increments
with a uniform pattern.
|
•
|
Large storefront windows are 10 feet with transoms above and
a wood panel or glazed tile kickplate beneath.
|
•
|
Storefront have single light wood framed entry doors that are
recessed.
|
•
|
Glazed decorative tile detailing and wood paneling below windows
is typical.
|
•
|
Heights of the parapets vary, but they are usually harmonious
with adjacent buildings.
|
•
|
Signage appropriate to the era.
|
•
|
Period light fixtures.
|
•
|
Sidewalks with brushed cement and two-foot squares.
|
7. Signs.
Retaining and restoring original signs which have traditionally linked
Railroad Square buildings to their environment is a primary goal.
New signs shall be designed to be compatible with the character of
Railroad Square in size, scale, material, and color. In approving
sign permits for Railroad Square, the review authority shall make
the consider the following criteria:
a. The original signs and building graphics have been restored wherever possible. The size, type, location and quantity shall be calculated in compliance with Zoning Code Chapter
20-38, which regulates signs;
b. The proposed signs are compatible with the character of the building
and the district in terms of scale, materials, and color;
c. The proposed sign adheres to Railroad Square's overall design concept
of retaining and enhancing the distinctive architectural character
that existed between 1900 and the1930s;
d. The proposed signage is oriented to the pedestrian as the primary
user of the Railroad Square historic specialty shopping area; and
e. Signage for upper story tenants is comprised of painted lettered
window signs similar to the gold-leaf type or similarly compatible.
H. St.
Rose Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The St. Rose Preservation District was designated by the Cultural
Heritage Board on November 28, 1990 (Resolution #0027).
2. Boundaries.
The St. Rose Preservation District is bounded by Lincoln Street (properties
on both sides) on the north; 6th and 7th Streets on the south; B Street
(properties on both sides) on the east; and Morgan Street on the west.
See Figure 2-4.
Figure 2-4—St. Rose Preservation District
|
3. Context
statement. The St. Rose Preservation District is significant for its
architecture as a cross-section of Santa Rosa's residential building
types and some institutional and commercial types. Though primarily
residential, the district has this variety because it is adjacent
to Santa Rosa's commercial core, and because similar variety, perhaps
less intense, used to exist in most residential neighborhoods prior
to the advent of zoning restrictions. Dates of construction vary from
1872 to 1948, but the big growth came in the early 1920s with nearly
40 new houses, all single-story, mostly bungalows along Lincoln St.
Notable exceptions to the modest residences are some of Santa Rosa's
grandest surviving 19th century residences.
The district grew up around St. Rose Church and school, but
its main cohesiveness today results from its surroundings. In addition
to the houses, the residential building types found in the district
include duplexes, small apartment buildings, and a small late bungalow
court. Commercial types include three Art Deco office buildings. The
most prominent institution is St. Rose Church, a Romanesque Revival
stone structure built by local Italian stone masons in 1900. The large
St. Rose School is on another face of the same block. The Santa Rosa
Post Office relocated to the St. Rose Preservation District in 1979
and is listed on the Na-tional Register; it is one of more than 12
buildings that have been moved into the district.
4. Period
of significance. 1872 to 1948.
5. Neighborhood
character. The St. Rose Preservation District is primarily residential
with a wide range of architectural styles as shown below. The northern
portion of the district has vernacular versions of the architecture
reflective of residential growth in the 1920s. Houses in the southern
portion of the district were built in the 1800s and reflect an older
period of development.
Residential parcels are generally 40 to 50 feet wide. Single
car detached garages are located on rear lot lines with narrow driveway
access. Generally uniform front setbacks are found on any given block
face. When found, front yard fences are typically three-foot tall
picket. St. Rose has maintained the traditional two-foot sidewalk
squares within the public right-of-way.
Houses are typically small, simple, and one story with stylistic
elements appropriate to their dates of construction. There are several
large and elaborate houses sprinkled throughout the district (Italianate,
Stick, and Queen Anne). Houses are generally wood framed with narrow
clapboard or shingle exteriors, although some examples of stucco exterior
are found. Full or partial width porches with orientation toward the
street are typical. Double hung wood sash windows in simple rectangular
form are common.
Multi-pane windows are also typical. Front doors generally include
windows.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural styles.
•
|
Bungalow.
|
•
|
Queen Anne.
|
•
|
Craftsman.
|
•
|
Italianate.
|
•
|
Colonial Revival.
|
•
|
Mediterranean Revival.
|
•
|
Art Deco.
|
•
|
Gothic Revival.
|
•
|
Victorian Gothic.
|
•
|
Provincial.
|
b. Types of buildings.
•
|
Predominantly one-story (especially on the north side of Lincoln
Street).
|
•
|
Two- and three-story.
|
•
|
Predominantly single-story houses.
|
•
|
Small apartment buildings.
|
•
|
Small-scale commercial buildings.
|
•
|
Church.
|
•
|
St. Rose School Building Materials.
|
c. Building materials.
•
|
Predominantly wood siding..
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Narrow, deep lots (typically 50 feet x 100-120 feet), with the
exception of the lots on the north side of Lincoln Street, which are
shallow.
|
•
|
A mix of large and small houses.
|
•
|
Front yard fences.
|
•
|
Sidewalks with planter strips.
|
I. Cherry
Street Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The Cherry Street Preservation District was designated by the City
Council on March 24, 1992 (Resolution #20725) after recommendation
by the Cultural Heritage Board on January 8, 1992 (Resolution #0039).
2. Boundaries.
The Cherry Street Preservation District is bounded by Cherry Street
(properties on both sides) on the north; 7th Street on the south;
west of "E" Street on the east; and Riley Street and east of Mendocino
Avenue on the west. See Figure 2-5.
Figure 2-5—Cherry Street Preservation District
|
3. Context
statement. The Cherry Street Preservation District is significant
for its architecture as a cross section of Santa Rosa's residential
building types between 1870 and 1946. In addition to the many examples
of modest 19th and 20th century dwellings, there are a large number
of Victorian era mansions scattered throughout the district. Some
institutional and commercial uses are found here as well. The Cherry
Street District reflects the kind of diversity often found in older
portions of American towns. The district derives additional significance
from being the home of many early Santa Rosa leaders of commerce,
government, religion and education.
The Cherry Street District is one of the oldest neighborhoods
in Santa Rosa and contains the highest concentration of 19th century
buildings in the City. Particularly noteworthy are the remaining Queen
Anne and Stick style mansions scattered throughout the neighborhood.
The district also contains fine examples of early 20th century dwellings,
although these usually are of a more modest scale than their Victorian
counter-parts.
For the district as a whole, the integrity is above average.
Relatively little large scale exterior remodeling has occurred over
the years and most structures retain stylistic elements appropriate
to their dates of construction. The structural condition of most buildings
appears quite sound. Cherry Street itself, the center-piece of the
neighborhood, is four blocks long and is contained entirely within
the confines of the district.
The irregular street pattern of the neighborhood results from
conflicting grids. The grid along 7th Street follows the original
downtown grid system laid out parallel to Santa Rosa Creek.
4. Period
of significance. 1870 to 1946.
5. District
character. The Cherry Street Preservation District is predominately
made up of single-family homes and showcases a range of architectural
styles. Generally, the homes in the Cherry Street District are one-
or two-story and sited on original 50-foot by 100-or 150-foot lots,
with lawns and mature landscaping surround the houses. Many of the
larger trees in the neighborhood were planted at the time of house
construction and contribute to the neighborhood character.
Cherry Street itself is the spine of the district. The district's
larger homes are located on Cherry Street and the properties on the
north side are alley loaded. Many of the homes on Cherry Street appear
taller than more contemporary two stories due to attic space.
Defined front entries with orientation to the street are typical.
Front setbacks are 15 to 20 feet with some variation on each block
face, and five-foot side yard setbacks are typical. The majority of
the houses are wood framed with clap board, shiplap, and shingle exteriors.
Some examples of stucco are found throughout the district. Steep pitched
roofs and basements are also common features of existing single-family
dwellings.
There are many examples of historic double-hung wood sash windows,
found both as singles and in pairs. Detached garages are located on
rear and/or side property lines with narrow driveway access. Generally,
accessory structures are single story, although some examples of two
stories with second units above the garage are found.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural styles.
•
|
Art Moderne.
|
•
|
Beaux Arts.
|
•
|
Bungalows.
|
•
|
Colonial Revival.
|
•
|
Craftsman.
|
•
|
Gothic Revival.
|
•
|
Greek Revival.
|
•
|
Italianate.
|
•
|
Mediterranean Revival.
|
•
|
Prairie School.
|
•
|
Provincial.
|
•
|
Queen Anne.
|
•
|
Shingle.
|
•
|
Stick-Estate.
|
b. Building materials.
•
|
Predominantly wood siding.
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
c. Building heights.
•
|
Predominantly single-story.
|
•
|
Two-story.
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Narrow but deep lots (typically 50 feet x 100-150 feet).
|
•
|
Less than 40 percent lot coverage.
|
•
|
Both large and small houses.
|
•
|
Entry doors face the street.
|
•
|
Alleys.
|
•
|
Lawns.
|
•
|
Front yard fences.
|
•
|
Narrow streets.
|
•
|
Traditional light standards.
|
J. Olive
Park Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The Olive Park Preservation District was designated by the City Council
on July 11, 1995 (Resolution #22328) after recommendation by the Cultural
Heritage Board on May 24, 1995 (Resolution #0057).
2. Boundaries.
Olive Park Preservation District is bounded by Buckingham Drive and
Santa Rosa Creek on the north; State Highway 12 freeway on the south;
U.S. Highway 101 freeway on the east; and the alley between Chestnut
Street and Olive Street on the west. See Figure 2-6.
Figure 2-6—Olive Park Preservation District
|
3. Context
statement. The Olive Park District is a homogeneous group of 43 residential
properties and a park, and is significant as an example of Santa Rosa's
residential context. The District demonstrates the housing chosen
by middle-class shopkeepers and craftsmen in the early 20th century.
Early residents included proprietors of a furniture store, liquor
stores, gas stations, plumbing shops, an auto repair shop, a photographer,
and a general contractor; as well as various craftsmen. The district
also displays strong family ties to the neighborhood. The historic
houses are remarkably intact and represent a fine collection of turn-of-the
century styles. The feeling of a historic neighborhood is very strong
here. The public park is one of Santa Rosa's oldest.
4. Period
of significance. 1891 to 1926.
5. District
character. Olive Park Preservation District is a quiet residential
enclave bordered by bustling downtown and at the intersection of Highway
12 and Highway 101. There are a variety of architectural styles found
in the District, most of which remain remarkably intact, and no two
homes are alike.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural styles.
•
|
Bungalows.
|
•
|
Colonial Revival.
|
•
|
Craftsman.
|
•
|
Hipped-roof boxes.
|
•
|
Prairie School.
|
•
|
Queen Anne.
|
b. Types of buildings.
•
|
Predominantly one-story (some have a raised basement resulting
in a taller, still single-story profile).
|
•
|
Two-story
|
•
|
Single-family houses.
|
•
|
Small apartment buildings.
|
c. Types of building materials.
•
|
Predominantly wood siding (narrow clapboards, rustic, shingles).
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
•
|
Generally double-hung wood windows.
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Narrow but deep lots (typically 50 feet x 134 feet).
|
•
|
Medium and small houses.
|
•
|
Tree lined streets.
|
•
|
Olive Park.
|
•
|
Yard area is all four sides.
|
•
|
Most houses have front porches oriented towards the street.
|
•
|
Front setbacks are generally consistent on any one block.
|
•
|
Parking is generally limited to one single-car, detached garage
at the rear of the property.
|
•
|
Garages are generally accessed from the alleyway.
|
K. Burbank
Gardens Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The Burbank Gardens Preservation District was designated by the City
Council on March 25, 2003 (Resolution #25606) with recommendation
of the Cultural Heritage Board on January 22, 2003 (Resolution #145).
2. Boundaries.
The Burbank Gardens Preservation District is bounded by Sonoma Avenue
and Tupper Street (east of Hendley Street) to the north, Santa Rosa
Avenue to the west, Maple Street to the south, and South E Street
on the east. See Figure 2-7.
Figure 2-7—Burbank Gardens Preservation District
|
3. Context
statement. The Burbank Gardens Preservation District is significant
in the context of the residential development of Santa Rosa. The district
includes the small Riverside (1904), Freeman (1875), and Tupper (1873)
additions and the larger Wheeler (1875) addition south of Charles
Street. The name Burbank Gardens comes from Luther Burbank's home
and gardens located in the northwest corner of the district (a City
Park and local landmark, and listed on both the State and National
Registers), which served as the focal point for the area's residential
development between 1875 to 1903. Some of the lots on Tupper Street,
closest to the Burbank House, are said to be on former Burbank property,
developed by Burbank or his widow.
An 1896 Directory lists 11 residences including that of Luther
Burbank. By 1903, 15 residences were listed and in six years the total
had doubled to 30. Many of the early houses are found in the area
of Burbank's home and gardens. Early residents included a nurseryman,
railroad men, carpenters, and a paper hanger. Houses built in the
northern section include examples of single-story with raised basements,
reflecting not only the architectural style of the time but also their
proximity to the flooding creek.
The southern section has many cottages and bungalows, all built
in a modest scale.
4. Period
of significance. 1875 to 1940s.
5. District
character. The Burbank Gardens Preservation District is a fairly homogenous
district of small single-family homes, predominately Bungalows representing
the bulk of development that occurred in the 1920s and 1930s with
a mix of other architectural as shown below, as well as some duplexes,
apartment buildings, small commercial buildings and Burbank Home and
Gardens.
Houses are generally single-story with some exceptions found
in the northern portion of the district, closer to Santa Rosa Creek.
Architectural detailing is minimal and simple. Double hung wood windows
are common.
Typical lots are narrow, generally measuring 40 to 50 feet.
Houses generally follow a similar front setback on any given block
face and front stoops or small porches create clearly defined entries
with orientation to the street. Front yard fencing is generally three-foot
tall picket fencing if any at all. Small front yards include informal
landscaping. Single car garages are located at the rear of property,
often on a side property line with narrow driveway access.
Although some houses are found on Santa Rosa Avenue, in general
the character along this outer edge of the district is different.
Most district properties along Santa Rosa Avenue are considered noncontributing
properties, although two National Register properties (Luther Burbank
Home and Gardens and Park Apartments) are found along this strip.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural styles.
•
|
Bungalow.
|
•
|
Colonial Revival.
|
•
|
Italianate.
|
•
|
Period Revival.
|
•
|
Queen Anne.
|
b. Building materials.
•
|
Predominantly wood siding (shingle, shiplap, and clapboard).
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
c. Building height.
•
|
Predominantly single-story.
|
•
|
Two-story.
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Narrow lots (typically 40 feet wide).
|
•
|
Small houses, predominantly Bungalow-style.
|
•
|
Interior courtyards for multifamily.
|
•
|
Open lawns.
|
•
|
Narrow streets.
|
•
|
Parks.
|
L. Ridgway
Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The Ridgway Preservation District was designated by the City Council
on March 6, 2007 (Resolution #3818) with recommendation of the Cultural
Heritage Board on November 15, 2006 (Resolution #0225).
2. Boundaries.
The Ridgway Preservation District is bounded by Ridgway Avenue on
the north; College Avenue on the south; Mendocino Avenue on the east;
and U.S. Highway 101 freeway on the west. See Figure 2-8.
Figure 2-8—Ridgway Preservation District
|
3. Context
statement. Architecturally, the Ridgway Preservation District provides
a panoramic view of historic progression of building styles. The District
has some particularly good examples of modest, well-designed 1920s
residences as well as newer dwellings constructed in the 1930s, 1940s
and even the 1950s. The District encompasses an architectural time
span of Santa Rosa starting with early hip roof residences, through
to the Spanish or Mission Revival homes, which are found in the northeast
section. Much of the early construction done in the district was the
work of Roberts and Simpson who worked locally as contractors and
carpenters. A number of the larger homes within the area were converted
to multiple living units, probably during World War II.
There are two particularly distinctive structures on Mendocino
Avenue, both designed by Petaluma architect Brainerd Jones. One is
the Belvedere, a late Queen Anne built for W. H. Lumsden, now an excellent
example of adaptive re-use that retains the integrity of its design
both inside and out. The other is the Oates/Comstock residence, an
outstanding Shingle Style house with Colonial Revival elements.
4. Period
of significance. Not identified.
5. District
character. Not identified.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural styles.
•
|
Hip Roof.
|
•
|
Spanish Revival.
|
•
|
Mission Revival.
|
•
|
Queen Anne.
|
b. Building materials.
•
|
Predominantly wood siding (shingle, shiplap, and clapboard).
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
c. Building height.
•
|
Predominantly single-story.
|
•
|
Two-story.
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Narrow lots (typically 40 feet wide).
|
•
|
Small houses, predominantly Bungalow-style.
|
•
|
Interior courtyards for multifamily.
|
•
|
Open lawns.
|
•
|
Narrow streets.
|
•
|
Parks.
|
M. McDonald
Avenue Preservation District.
1. Designation.
The McDonald Avenue Preservation District was designated a local district
by the City Council on November 3, 1998 (Resolution #23742) after
receiving recommendation from the Cultural Heritage Board on September
23, 1998 (Resolution #0087).
2. Boundaries.
The McDonald Avenue Preservation District is located in the northeast
quadrant of the City and bounded by Franklin and Pacific Avenues to
the north, College Avenue and Fourth Street to the south, St. Helena
Avenue to the east and Monroe and Stewart Streets on the west. See
Figure 2-9.
Figure
2-9—McDonald Avenue Preservation District
|
4. Period
of significance. 1878 to 1940.
6. Character
defining elements.
a. Architectural styles.
•
|
Bungalow.
|
•
|
Colonial Revival.
|
•
|
Craftsman.
|
•
|
English Cottage.
|
•
|
Greek Revival.
|
•
|
Hip-roofed Cottage.
|
•
|
Italianate.
|
•
|
Mediterranean Revival.
|
•
|
Period Revival.
|
•
|
Prairie School.
|
•
|
Provincial.
|
•
|
Queen Anne.
|
•
|
Shingle.
|
•
|
Stick-Eastlake.
|
•
|
Tudor Revival.
|
•
|
1930s track type.
|
b. Types of buildings.
•
|
Predominantly one- and two-story.
|
•
|
Predominantly single-family.
|
•
|
Duplex units.
|
•
|
Small apartment buildings.
|
•
|
Other miscellaneous buildings (i.e., church, school, nursery,
warehouse).
|
c. Building materials.
•
|
Predominantly wood siding.
|
•
|
Stucco.
|
d. Neighborhood elements.
•
|
Medium and larger lots (typically 50 feet x 150 feet or larger).
|
•
|
Less than 40 percent lot coverage.
|
•
|
Large, medium and small houses.
|
•
|
Entry door face the street.
|
•
|
Alleys.
|
•
|
Lawns.
|
•
|
Front yard fences.
|
•
|
Wide and normal streets.
|
•
|
Traditional light standards.
|
(Ord. 3677 § 1, 2004; Ord. 3950 § 12, 2010; Ord. 2020-014 § 14)
A. Purpose.
The -SR combining district is intended to enhance and preserve the
natural and constructed features that contribute to the character
of scenic roads. Natural and constructed features include trees, rock
walls, view corridors, road configuration and tree canopy.
B. Applicability. The -SR combining district may be combined with any primary zoning district established by Section
20-20.020 (Zoning Map and Zoning Districts), provided that the standards of this Section shall apply only to the portions of parcels within 125 feet or less from the edge of the pavement of the designated scenic road. All portions of a parcel more than 125 feet from the edge of the pavement of a designated scenic road shall be regulated by the standards of the primary zoning district.
C. Allowed
land uses and permit requirements. Any land use normally allowed in
the primary zoning district by this Division may be allowed within
the -SR combining district, subject to the land use permit requirements
of the primary district.
D. Site
planning and development standards. Proposed development and new land
uses shall comply with the following standards, as applicable. In
the event of any conflict between the following standards and those
of the primary zoning district, the most restrictive shall apply.
1. Brush
Creek Road and Wallace Road. Scenic characteristics consist of the
many native and ornamental trees that line the roadway as well as
groups of trees found immediately adjacent to the roadway. Numerous
dry-laid rock walls formed from native field stone are along properties
fronting Brush Creek Road. Development density is very low and low
density with varied setbacks creating a rural to semi-rural character.
a. Minimum Brush Creek Road-Wallace Road lot frontage: 100 feet measured
at property line, provided that the access strip of a flag lot is
exempt from this requirement.
b. Minimum setback from Brush Creek Road-Wallace Road:
(1) 50 feet measured from edge of pavement to a one-story structure with
a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 100 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story structure,
or a one-story structure with a height over 25 feet;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Brush Creek Road or Wallace Road than the
existing dwelling, and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning
district;
(4) Fences, walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking, uncovered
decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures need
only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary zoning
district.
2. Calistoga
Road (North of Badger Avenue). Scenic characteristics consist of views
over Rincon Valley as one enters Santa Rosa from the northeast. This
portion of Calistoga Road is very picturesque due to the proximity
of the hills and the open pasture land. Most of the area has a semirural
character due to the very low density development consisting of low
ranch style homes on large lots. In addition the road surface is relatively
narrow with few urban improvements which reinforces the semi-rural
image as one enters and leaves Santa Rosa.
a. Minimum Calistoga Road lot frontage:
(1) 150 feet when a home fronts Calistoga Road;
(2) 100 feet when a home backs or sides on Calistoga Road.
b. Minimum setback from Calistoga Road:
(1) 50 feet measured from edge of pavement to back-on fencing or a one-story
structure with a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 100 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story structure
or a one-story structure with a height over 25 feet;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Calistoga Road than the existing dwelling,
and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district;
(4) Nonback-on fences and walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking,
uncovered decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures
need only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary
zoning district
3. Highway
12 (Calistoga Road to Oakmont). Scenic characteristics consist of
the picturesque views of the surrounding hills from the valley floor
as one enters and leaves Santa Rosa. The area has a semi-rural character
due to the variations in development patterns consisting of rural
homes on large lots and suburban subdivisions separated by open pasture.
The highway has a boulevard character due to the urban improvements
with a landscaped median. As the highway leaves Santa Rosa, the character
changes to a rural highway.
a. Minimum setback from Highway 12. The setback shall be measured from
the Highway 12 right-of-way, or the back of sidewalk, whichever provides
the greater setback:
(1) 50 feet to back-on fencing or one-story structure with a maximum
height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 100 feet to a two-story structure or one-story with height over 25
feet;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Highway 12 than the existing dwelling, and
complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district;
(4) Nonback-on fences and walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking,
uncovered decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures
need only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary
zoning district.
b. Require back-on landscaping to include dense planting of coniferous
tree and shrubs to screen development from view from Highway 12.
4. Los
Alamos Road. Scenic characteristics consist of the picturesque views
of hills and valleys from the road as one enters or leaves Santa Rosa.
Development along the road has a semi-rural-suburban character due
to the very low density development, consisting mostly of low ranch
style homes on large lots. Existing road improvements enhance the
semi-rural character due to the lack of urban improvements.
a. Minimum lot frontage: 100 feet measured at property line; provided
that the access strip of a flag lot is exempt from this requirement.
b. Minimum setback from Los Alamos Road:
(1) 30 feet measured from edge of pavement to back-on fencing or one-story
structure with a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 100 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story structure
or one-story structure with a height over 25 feet;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Los Alamos Road than the existing dwelling,
and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district;
(4) Nonback-on fences and walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking,
uncovered decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures
need only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary
zoning district.
5. Los
Olivos Road (entire length). Scenic characteristics consist of the
many native and ornamental trees that line the roadway that give the
roadway a sense of shelter and offer varied patterns in light and
shadow as one travels along the corridor. The very low density development
and large setbacks help to establish a setting that is rural in character.
In addition the road surface is relatively narrow with minimal urban
improvements alone, most of its length which reinforces the image
of a rural environment.
a. Minimum Los Olivos Road lot frontage: 100 feet measured at property
line; provided that the access strip of a flag lot is exempt from
this requirement.
b. Minimum setback from Los Olivos Road:
(1) 50 feet measured from edge of pavement to a one-story structure with
a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 100 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story structure,
or one-story structure with a height over 25 feet;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Los Olivos Road than the existing dwelling,
and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district;
(4) Fences, walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking, uncovered
decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures need
only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary zoning
district.
6. Manzanita
Avenue (Entire Length). Scenic characteristics consist of the many
native and ornamental trees that line the roadway that give the roadway
a sense of shelter and offer varied patterns in light and shadow as
one travels along the corridor. The very low density development and
large setbacks help to establish a setting that is rural in character.
The road surface is also relatively narrow with no urban improvements,
which reinforces the image of a rural environment.
a. Minimum Manzanita Avenue lot frontage: 100 feet measured at property
line; provided that the access strip of a flag lot is exempt from
this requirement.
b. Minimum setback from Manzanita Avenue:
(1) 75 feet measured from edge of pavement to one-story structure with
a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 125 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story structure
or a one-story structure over 25 feet in height;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Manzanita Avenue than the existing dwelling,
and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district;
(4) Fences, walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking, uncovered
decks, gazebos, and other decorative accessory structures need only
comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary zoning
district.
7. Melita
Road. Scenic characteristics consist of the many native and ornamental
trees that the line the road-way that give the roadway a sense of
shelter and offer varied patterns in light and shadow as one travels
along the corridor. The rural character is enhanced by the very narrow
width and curves of the road. In addition, portions of the road parallel
Santa Rosa Creek. The most scenic areas of the road lack urban street
improvements. Most of the area has a very low density rural character
with relatively small homes on large lots. The road has an historic
feel due to the rock walls and former stagecoach station.
a. Minimum Melita Road lot frontage: 100 feet measured at property line;
provided that the access strip of a flag lot is exempt from this requirement.
b. Minimum setback from Melita Road:
(1) 50 feet measured from edge of pavement to a one-story structure with
a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 100 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story structure
or to a one-story structure with a height over 25 feet;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Melita Road than the existing dwelling,
and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district;
(4) Fences, walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking, uncovered
decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures need
only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary zoning
district.
c. Minimum lot area. The minimum area of lots that border on Melita
Road and are located in the Very Low Density General Plan designation
shall be 40,000 square feet. This requirement does not apply to existing
or new flag lots where only the access strip has frontage on Melita
Road or the creation of a new lot where the new lot does not border
on Melita Road.
8. Montecito
Avenue (Norte Way to Chanate Avenue). Scenic characteristics consist
of the many native and ornamental trees that line the roadway that
give the roadway a sense of shelter and offer varied patterns in light
and shadow as one travels along the corridor. The very low density
development and large setbacks help to establish a setting that is
rural in character. In addition the road surface is relatively narrow
with no urban improvements which reinforces the image of a rural environment
a. Minimum Montecito Avenue lot frontage: 100 feet measured at property
line; provided that the access strip of a flag lot is exempt from
this requirement.
b. Minimum setback from Montecito Avenue:
(1) 75 feet measured from edge of pavement to a one-story structure with
a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 125 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story structure,
or one-story structure with a height over 25 feet;
(3) Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Montecito Avenue than the existing dwelling,
and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district;
(4) Fences, walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking, uncovered
decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures need
only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary zoning
district.
c. Minimum lot area: 40,000 square feet for lots that border on Montecito
Avenue; provided that this requirement does not apply to existing
or new flag lots where only the access strip has frontage on Montecito
Avenue or the creation of a new lot where the new lot does not border
on Montecito Avenue.
9. Francisco
Avenue (east/west portion). Scenic characteristics consist of the
picturesque views of the surrounding hills from the valley floor from
the northern edge of the City of Santa Rosa. The area has a semi-rural
character due to the transition from the City of Santa Rosa into Sonoma
County. The transition primarily consists of rural county land, characterized
by rural residential development, to the north, and more urbanized
subdivisions to the south.
a. Minimum setback from Francisco Avenue. The setback shall be measured
from the Francisco Avenue back of side walk:
(1) 14 feet to back-on fencing or one-story structure or element with
a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2) 24 feet to a two-story structure or element, or one-story structure
or element with height over 25 feet;
(3) Non back-on fences and walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking,
uncovered decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures
need only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary
zoning district.
b. Require an 8-foot planter on the south side of the street, with trees
and other low plantings, to transition from the urban characteristics
of the City of Santa Rosa into the rural setting to the north. The
plantings are not intended to screen the urban development, but to
assist the transition.
10. Burbank Avenue (from the northerly boundary of Roseland Creek Community
Park to Hearn Avenue). Scenic characteristics consist of larger front
setbacks than typically found in low density, single-family residential
areas, and a narrow roadway width that provides a "country road" feel,
as well as roadside trees that create an occasional wooded "tunnel"
effect. The area has a semi-rural residential character, with more
urbanized subdivisions to the north and south.
a. Minimum setback from Burbank Avenue:
(1)
20 feet measured from edge of pavement to one-story structure
or element with a maximum height not exceeding 25 feet;
(2)
25 feet measured from edge of pavement to a two-story or greater
structure or element, or one-story structure or element with height
over 25 feet;
(3)
Fences and walls, hedges, swimming pools, uncovered parking,
uncovered decks, gazebos, and other decorative type accessory structures
need only comply with the setbacks and other standards of the primary
zoning district.
b. Where an existing dwelling does not comply with the above setbacks,
single story additions and single story accessory structures are allowed
within the above setbacks provided that an addition or accessory structure
does not extend closer to Burbank Avenue than the existing dwelling,
and complies with the setbacks of the primary zoning district.
c. Roadway improvements. Roadway improvements along Burbank Avenue shall
be designed consistent with the street sections included in the Roseland
Area/Sebastopol Road Specific Plan.
E. Replacement of damaged or destroyed nonconforming structure. A nonconforming structure within the -SR combining district that is damaged or destroyed may be restored, reconstructed, and used as before, provided that the restoration does not increase the degree of nonconformity with the requirements of this Section, and that the restoration complies with the requirements of the primary zoning district. Restoration that does not comply with the primary zoning district may occur only in compliance with Chapter
20-61 (Nonconforming Uses and Structures).
F. Tree removal. The following requirements apply in addition to those in Municipal Code Chapter
17-24 (Trees).
1. Existing
developed parcels within 50 feet of a scenic road. A Tree Removal
Permit is required prior to the removal of any tree, including an
exempt tree. Prior to the approval of a Tree Removal Permit, the applicant
shall demonstrate that the removal of the tree will not have a negative
impact on the scenic quality of the corridor, or that the tree is
a hazard and/or unhealthy as determined by the Director. If the Director
cannot determine whether the tree is a hazard or the health of the
tree, the applicant shall hire an arborist to make the determination.
2. Tree
removal for new development within 100 feet of a scenic road. Special
care shall be taken to preserve the maximum number of trees possible,
including exempt trees. Prior to the approval of a project the applicant
shall demonstrate that each tree proposed for removal shall not have
a negative impact on the scenic quality of the corridor, or that the
tree is a hazard or unhealthy, as determined by a certified arborist.
G. Alteration
of rock walls or other identified scenic feature. Any removal or alteration
of a rock wall or other identified scenic feature in conjunction with
new development or a public projects within the -SR combining district
shall be avoided or minimized whenever possible, through alternative
project configurations.
(Ord. 3677 § 1, 2004; Ord. 4052 § 1, 2015; Ord. 4074 § 3, 2016)
A. Purpose.
The -DSA combining district is intended to enhance and reinforce distinctive
characteristics within the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan area
and create environments that are comfortable to walk in by establishing
development form, intensity, streetscape, and public realm standards.
B. Applicability. The -DSA combining district may be combined with the Core Mixed Use (CMU), Station Mixed Use (SMU), Maker Space Mixed Use (MMU), or Neighborhood Mixed Use (NMU) primary zoning district established by Section
20-20.020 (Zoning Map and zoning districts), provided that the standards of this section shall apply as directed in each of the subsections under Subsection
E (Site planning and development standards). All other portions of a parcel shall be regulated by the standards of the primary zoning district. The -DSA combining district is applicable to any property designated Downtown Transition, Neighborhood Transition, Creek and Trail Activation, and Active Ground Floor Overlay in the Downtown Station Area Plan.
C. Allowed
land uses and permit requirements. Any land use normally allowed in
the primary zoning district by this Division may be allowed within
the -DSA combining district, subject to the land use permit requirements
of the primary district.
D. Locations
of combining district. The standards of this section apply to properties
designated Downtown Transition, Neighborhood Transition, Creek and
Trail Activation, or Active Ground Floor Overlay on the Downtown Station
Area Specific Plan Map UDCS-1: Special Design Considerations (see
Figure 2-26 below).
E. Downtown
Transition. Downtown Transition Standards are applied to areas within
the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan area to create a welcome pedestrian
environment in the downtown core area. In the event of conflict between
the following development standards and those of the primary zoning
district, the most restrictive shall apply.
1. Buildings
in the Downtown Transition zone, shown in Figure 2-26, shall step
back a minimum of six feet, or as approved by the Review Authority,
above the fifth floor along the frontage of Fourth and Fifth Streets.
F. Neighborhood
Transition. Neighborhood Transition Standards are applied to areas
within the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan area to reduce the
visual impact of new development on residential areas of preservation
districts. In the event of any conflict between the following development
standards and those of the primary zoning district, the most restrictive
shall apply.
1. Development
of the properties identified in the Neighborhood Transition zones
shown on Figure 2-26, shall comply with the following standards:
|
Seventh, Ninth/W. Ninth, Cherry, Riley, and B Streets, and Sonoma
Avenue
|
Santa Rosa and College Avenues and E Street
|
---|
Front setback
|
6-10 feet (min/max) with trees, shrubs, and groundcovers per requirements of Zoning Code Chapter 20-34.
|
|
Stepback
|
Buildings must step back from the street frontage a minimum
of 10 feet above the third floor. Above 6 stories, buildings must
maintain a daylight plane of 45 degrees as shown in Figure 2-27.
|
Buildings must step back from the rear a minimum of 10 feet
above the third floor and a minimum of 20 feet above the sixth floor.
Above 6 stories, buildings must maintain a daylight plane of
45 degrees as shown in Figure 2-27.
|
Ground floors
|
Residential and mixed-use projects located across the street
from single-family neighborhoods shall orient the buildings to the
street with individual entries, patio areas and landscaping facing
the single-family homes.
|
|
Surface parking
|
Surface parking areas are not permitted between the sidewalk
and the building façade.
|
|
G. Creek
and Trail Activation Transition. The Creek and Trail Activation Transition
is applied to promote the use and visibility of specified creek areas
within the DSASP area.
1. New
development in the areas identified for creek and trail activation
on Figure 2-26 shall provide at least one activating use or at least
two activating design features fronting the creek and trail as noted
below.
At least one of the following activating uses:
|
OR
|
At least two of the following activating design features:
|
---|
A public space or plaza up to 5% of the total lot size with
a minimum width of 30 ft
|
|
One piece of site furniture for each 100 linear feet of creek/trail
frontage, which may include seating, informational kiosks, bicycle
racks, and trash/recycling receptacles or outdoor fitness equipment
|
A café, restaurant, brew pub, retail space or substantially
similar use
|
|
Integrated public art in the form of a mural, sculpture, light
display, or other original work of a permanent nature as defined in
the City Code
|
Interpretive signage related to Santa Rosa Creek and its riparian
habitat
|
2. New
buildings within 200 feet of the creek top of bank shall be constructed
so that at least one pedestrian entrance faces the creek. Where stoop
entrances to residential units are provided, these shall face the
creek.
3. New
development shall provide pedestrian pathways at least 15 feet in
width to connect the development to the creekside trail network. Pedestrian
pathways must be provided at least every 600 feet along the creek
to enhance connectivity to the surrounding area.
4. As
development occurs in the creek and trail activation areas shown in
Figure 2-26, lighting should be provided consistent with Santa Rosa
Creek Design Guidelines.
5. Blank
façades at ground level and above should be avoided. Windows,
doors and transparent opening are encouraged to provide "eyes on the
creek" and heighten sense of security. To the extent feasible, surface
and structured parking should not front onto the creek or trail.
H. Active
Ground Floor Overlay. Within the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan
area, active ground floor frontages are key to creating the vibrant
character envisioned for the Downtown Station Area. All proposed development
on a parcel designated Active Ground Floor Overlay in Figure 2-26
shall comply with the following development standards. In the event
of any conflict between the following development standards and those
of the primary zoning district, the most restrictive shall apply.
1. On
corner lots where only one frontage is in the Active Ground Floor
Overlay, ground floor activating strategies shall also be applied
to the intersecting street frontage as appropriate, subject to review
by the review authority.
2. New
development with frontage on streets in the Active Ground Floor Overlay
as shown on Figure 2-26 shall provide design features that optimize
the pedestrian experience. To comply with this requirement, developments
with up to 90 linear feet of frontage must provide two or more of
the following and Developments with over 90 linear feet of frontage
must provide three or more of the following:
•
|
Awnings or overhangs over all ground floor entrances;
|
•
|
One piece of street furniture per 15 linear feet of street frontage.
Street furniture may include seating, ornamental planting boxes, informational
kiosks, bicycle racks, or trash/recycling receptacles integrated into
front setbacks where sidewalk width is not sufficient to accommodate
street furniture;
|
•
|
Integrated public art in the form of a mural, sculpture, light
display, or other original work of a permanent nature as defined in
the City Code;
|
•
|
At least 600 square feet of publicly accessible active or passive
recreational space on-site, or in the form of a curbside parklet;
|
•
|
A green/living wall of a size equivalent to at least 15 percent
of the building façade as measured between two and 12 feet
above sidewalk level;
|
•
|
Innovative alternative strategies to optimize the pedestrian
experience along Active Ground Floor Overlay streets. Staff will evaluate
proposals on a case by case basis for compliance with applicable DSASP
Urban Design Principles and development standards.
|
Alternatively, this requirement can be satisfied through compliance
with Policy LU-1.4 in the Land Use chapter.
|
3. Properties
with street frontage in the Active Ground Floor Overlay shall provide
at least one primary pedestrian entrance or alternative design solution(s)
that implements active ground floor goals as described in the 2020
Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, subject to approval by the review
authority.
4. Ground
floor façades of nonresidential development on streets in the
Active Ground Floor Overlay shall have clear glass that is free of
tinting or other glazing material to allow views of indoor space between
a height of two and seven feet above grade as shown in Figure 2-28
below.
5. Where
a project site is bordered by side street or alley, vehicular access
shall betaken from side street or alley subject to discretionary review.
6. Surface
parking shall not be located between the sidewalk and building façade
on streets in the Active Ground Floor Overlay.
7. Loading
and service areas shall not be visible from streets in the Active
Ground Floor Overlay and shall be located at the rear of the property,
within structures, or on interior streets.
(Ord. 2020-014 § 16; Ord. 2021-012 § 18)
A. Purpose.
The -RC combining district is intended to facilitate the reconstruction
and resilience of areas impacted by the Tubbs and Nuns fires of October
2017 and the Glass Fire of 2020.
B. Applicability. The -RC combining district shall apply to properties within the Santa Rosa City limits that were impacted by the Tubbs and Nuns fires of October 2017 and the Glass Fire of 2020, as set forth in subsection
C. The -RC combining district may be combined with any primary zoning district established by Section
20-20.020 (Zoning Map and zoning districts).
C. Locations
of combining district. The standards of this section shall apply to
all properties directly impacted by the Tubbs, Nuns, and Glass fires,
as follows:
1. Coffey
Park area. Residential and nonresidential parcels generally bounded
by the City jurisdictional boundary to the north, Piner Road and Pinercrest
Drive to the south, Piner Creek to the east, and the SMART rail corridor
and Waltzer Road to the west, as depicted in Figure 2-18, Coffey Park
Area.
Figure 2-18 – Coffey Park Area
|
2. Highway
101 Corridor/Round Barn area. Residential and nonresidential parcels
generally bounded by the City jurisdictional boundary to the north,
Piner Road and Bicentennial Way to the south, Fountaingrove Parkway/Bicentennial
Way and Round Barn Boulevard to the east, and Piner Creek and Airway
Drive to the west, as depicted in Figure 2-19, Highway 101 Corridor/Round
Barn Area.
Figure 2-19 – Highway 101 Corridor/Roundbarn Area
|
3. Fountainview
area. Residential and nonresidential parcels generally bounded by
Fountaingrove Parkway to the north, Lake Park Drive to the south,
Altruria Drive, Glenview Place and Kelsey Knolls to the east, and
Bicentennial Way and Fountaingrove Parkway to the west, as depicted
in Figure 2-20, Fountainview Area.
Figure 2-20 – Fountainview Area
|
4. Fountaingrove
area. Residential and nonresidential parcels generally bounded by
the City jurisdictional boundary to the north, east and west, and
Fountaingrove Parkway, Keysight Technology campus and Chanate Road
to the south, as depicted in Figure 2-21, Fountaingrove Area.
Figure 2-21 – Fountaingrove Area
|
5. Montecito
Heights area. Residential and nonresidential parcels generally bounded
by the City jurisdictional boundary to the north and west, Badger
Road to the south, and Calistoga Road to the east, as depicted in
Figure 2-22, Montecito Heights Area.
Figure 2-22 – Montecito Heights Area
|
6. Oakmont
area. Residential and nonresidential parcels generally bounded by
the City jurisdictional boundary to the north, south and east, and
Melita Road to the west, as depicted in Figure 2-23, Oakmont Area.
Figure 2-23 – Oakmont Area
|
7. Skyhawk
area. Residential parcels generally bounded by Sunhawk Drive to the
north; San Ramon Way, Great Heron Drive, and Los Alamos Road to the
west; Los Alamos Road and Melita Road to the east; and Melita Road
to the south, as depicted in Figure 2-24, Skyhawk Area.
Figure 2-24 – Skyhawk Area
|
8. Piedmont
area. Residential parcels generally bounded by the City jurisdictional
boundary to the north; Calistoga Road to the West, Piedmont Drive
and Piedmont Court to the south, and Escalero Road to the east, as
depicted in Figure 2-25, Piedmont Area.
Figure 2-25 – Piedmont Area
|
D. Reconstruction
and repair of damaged structures and allowed land uses.
1. Reconstruction
and repair of damaged or destroyed structures within the -RC combining
district shall be consistent with all applicable zoning regulations
and General Plan land use designations in effect as of the date of
declaration of local emergency, with the exception of non-conforming
uses, addressed in Subsection D.5.
2. All
building permit applications within the -RC combining district shall
be prioritized over building permits in other areas of the City.
3. Reconstruction
of conforming structures. Conforming residential or nonresidential
structures within the - RC combining district may be reconstructed
as originally permitted (including permitted additions), but shall
comply with State and local building, fire and other State and local
code standards in effect at the time of building permit application,
with the exception of Santa Rosa Code Section 18-33.150.0(t) which
requires all electric building. All permit review for such structures
shall be as follows:
a. Building permit applications for structures replicating the original
footprint and building height, including permitted additions, and
meeting current State and local building and fire code standards shall
receive expedited review. No impact fees are applicable. If new water
or sewer connections are needed, demand fees are required.
b. Building permit applications for replacement structures that vary
from the originally permitted foot-print or building height, and that
meet current State and local building and fire code standards, will
be processed based on application submittal date. No impact fees are
applicable. If new water or sewer connections are needed, demand fees
are required.
4. Reconstruction
of legal nonconforming structures. Notwithstanding Zoning Code Section
20-61.030.B, structures within the -RC combining district that were
legally established, but do not conform to current City standards,
and have been damaged or destroyed may be reconstructed or repaired
in-kind, meeting current State and local building and fire code standards
with the exception of Santa Rosa Code Section 18-33.150.0(t) which
requires all electric building, provided that:
a. The building is reconstructed in the same configuration, square footage,
height, and use as originally permitted (including permitted additions);
and
b. Building overhangs in public and private easements.
(1) Public easements. Any portions of the building overhanging into an
existing public service or access easements are determined by the
City Engineer, Director of Planning and Economic Development, to have
existed prior to the October 2017 fires, and no expansion of the pre-existing
encroachment is proposed. The City Engineer will render a final determination
regarding the approval of the easement encroachment in consultation
with the Director of the City Department that is charged with the
responsibility for any and all City activities within the easement
area, and
(2) Private easements. Any portions of the building overhanging into
an existing private service or access easements are determined by
the City Engineer, Director of Planning and Economic Development,
to have existed prior to the October 2017 fires, and no expansion
of the pre-existing encroachment is proposed. The City Engineer will
render a final determination regarding the approval of the easement
encroachment upon receiving written permission from the easement beneficiaries
supporting the encroachment, and
(3) Required covenant. The property owner(s) shall execute and record
a covenant acknowledging that the City shall have no obligation, responsibility,
or liability for the repair, replacement, erection, installation,
or reconstruction of any portions of the structure overhanging a public
service easement that are damaged or removed by the City as part of
the installation, repair or maintenance of public utilities within
or around the easement corridor, and
c. Repair or reconstruction shall commence within six years of the date
of declaration of local emergency and be diligently pursued to completion.
5. Continuance
of nonconforming uses. Notwithstanding Zoning Code Section 20-61.020.D,
legal nonconforming uses of structures within the -RC combining district
that have been damaged or destroyed may be reconstructed or repaired
in-kind, meeting current building and fire code standards, and reoccupied
with a similar or less intense use, provided that:
a. Enlargement or expansion of the use is not allowed; and
b. Repair or reconstruction shall commence within six years of the date
of declaration of local emergency and be diligently pursued to completion.
If reoccupancy does not commence within 12 months of the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy, the legal nonconforming status shall
terminate, and the property shall thereafter be subject to all current
City Codes.
6. Continuance of legal uses. Legally permitted land uses in effect, or in operation, as of the date of local emergency, are able to recommence operations consistent with previous approvals. This section allows for an extension of the provisions of Section
20-54.070 if such uses recommence before the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section.
7. Accessory
dwelling units.
a. General provisions. Notwithstanding other provisions of this Zoning
Code, an accessory dwelling unit within the -RC combining district
may be constructed and occupied prior to the construction of a single-family
dwelling on the same parcel.
b. Internal conversions. If a reconstructed residence is built to the
previously permitted dimensions, without changing the footprint or
square footage of the original residence, an accessory dwelling unit
may be incorporated into the interior, consistent with State law,
and shall receive expedited review. The extent of the accessory dwelling
unit shall be identified in the building permit submittal. No impact
fees are applicable.
c. Detached accessory dwelling unit. Construction of a new detached
accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed with reconstruction of a
single-family dwelling. Building permit applications for the new detached
accessory dwelling unit will be processed based on application submittal
date. Impact fees for new detached accessory dwelling units shall
be as follows, or as otherwise approved by Council:
Unit Size (Square Feet)
|
Percentage of Standard Accessory Dwelling Unit Impact Fees Assessed
|
---|
Larger Than
|
Up To
|
---|
Internal Conversion
|
0%
|
-
|
750
|
0%
|
751
|
950
|
25%
|
951
|
1,200
|
50%
|
8. Temporary
housing. Temporary structures for habitation within the -RC combining
district, including trailers, recreational vehicles, manufactured
homes, tiny homes, and similar configurations are permitted on residential
and nonresidential parcels with a building permit and Zoning Clearance
where zoning district development standards are met. Water, wastewater
and electrical service shall be available on the site proposed for
temporary housing structures unless an alternative source is approved
by Santa Rosa Water.
a. Water. To protect the public water system, the appropriate approved
backflow device shall be required. Initial testing certification of
backflow devices is required and shall be performed by an entity as
determined by the Director of Santa Rosa Water. Permit and connection
fees shall be waived.
b. Wastewater. To protect public health, connection to the wastewater
system is required. The Director of Santa Rosa Water will determine
the appropriate connection requirement. Permit and connection fees
shall be waived.
A building permit application and Zoning Clearance shall be
required for temporary housing. All temporary structures shall be
removed from the site prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy
for a permanent residence on site, or within three years of building
permit issuance, whichever is sooner. Application processing, review
and inspection fees shall be waived. No impact fees are applicable.
|
E. Planned
Development zoning districts. Properties within the -RC combining
district that have a base zoning District of Planned Development shall
comply with the development standards of the policy statement for
that district. Where the development standards in the Policy Statement
are silent, or inconsistent with the current Zoning Code, the implementing
standard zoning district consistent with the General Plan land use
designation for the parcel(s) may be utilized, subject the determination
of the Director of Planning and Economic Development.
F. Hillside development. New structures within the -RC combining district that replicate pre-fire footprint and building height and which are designed in compliance with development standards set forth in Zoning Code Chapter
20-32, Hillside Development Standards, are hereby subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning and Economic Development. Hillside development application fees shall be waived. New development within the -RC combining district that increases pre-fire footprint by at least 10 percent or that otherwise increases visual or environmental impact, or a new land use on that portion of a site with a slope of 10 percent or greater, or any new structures within the -RC combining district that would otherwise require Planning Commission review for hillside development shall require Zoning Administrator review. Application fees shall apply.
G. Design Review. New structures within the -RC combining district that are designed to support the same or a less intensive use than existed pre-fire, and which are in compliance with development standards pursuant to Zoning Code Chapter
20-52, and that further would otherwise be subject to Zoning Administrator review pursuant to Zoning Code Section
20-52.030, are hereby subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning and Economic Development. Design Review application fees shall be waived. New structures within the -RC combining district that are designed to support a more intensive or substantially different use than existed pre-fire, or that would otherwise require Design Review Board review pursuant to Zoning Code Section
20-52.030, are hereby subject to Zoning Administrator review. Application fees shall apply.
1. Structures
rebuilt within the Oakmont Area shall be reconstructed within keeping
of the neighborhood, substantially similar to the pre-fire design,
and will be subject to approval of the Oakmont Homeowners Association.
H. At
least 10 calendar days prior to taking action on any Design Review
or Hillside Development Permit applications for replacement structures
that vary from the originally permitted footprint or building height,
the Director of Planning and Economic Development shall notify, by
mail, all persons or entities as set forth in Section 20.66.020.C.1.
No public hearing shall be required.
I. Final
map requirements. New structures within the -RC combining district
that would otherwise be subject to discretionary review with public
hearing per the conditions of a Final Subdivision Map, are hereby
subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning and Economic
Development. Applicable discretionary permit application fees shall
be waived.
1. Final
maps may contain setbacks on the face of the map that are more restrictive
than those published within the base zoning development standards
in effect at the time of building permit application. Final maps may
be amended through a Certificate of Correction to reduce the setbacks
to align with the base zoning requirements, provided that the original
setbacks were not a condition of the original unit construction and
intended to mitigate an impact created by the original site development.
J. Land
use, zoning or related Code provisions not addressed. Other than City
Code provisions within the jurisdiction of the Director of Santa Rosa
Water or the Board of Public Utilities, the Director of Planning and
Economic Development shall have the authority to make determinations
regarding the applicability of any land use, zoning or related City
Code provision not addressed in this section.
K. Notwithstanding
any other provision of the City Code, the provisions of the -RC combining
district shall control and prevail until expiration on December 31,
2024 unless otherwise amended by subsequent action of the Council.
(Ord. 2017-018 § 3; Ord. 2018-015 § 3; Ord. 2019-006 § 3; Ord. 2019-013 § 3; Ord. 2020-011 § 1; Ord. 2020-012 §
2; Ord. 2023-015, 11/28/2023)