A. 
Under authority of Government Code Section 66484, the board may, as a condition of issuance of a building permit or the approval of a final map, as defined in the Subdivision Map Act, require from the applicant the payment of a fee for the purpose of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, or constructing major thoroughfares.
B. 
The director of public works is authorized to prepare and present to the board proposed benefit assessments for the purposes stated in subsection A of this section.
C. 
Each proposal for imposition of a benefit assessment fee shall contain a certificate by the director of public works that the proposed bridge or major thoroughfare is within the scope of and consistent with the circulation element of the current county general plan or such plan as may hereafter be adopted.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
A. 
The director of public works shall cause a public hearing to be held before the board concerning imposition of any proposed benefit assessment fee prior to adoption and shall cause the required notice per Government Code Section 65905 to be issued.
B. 
The notice shall contain preliminary information related to the boundaries of the proposed area of benefit; the estimated cost of the project; and the method of fee apportionment for the specific project.
C. 
The notice may provide that each area of benefit include land or improvements in addition to the land or improvements which are the subject of any map or building permit application considered in such proceedings.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
A. 
The hearing conducted pursuant to Section 20.17.020 shall consider:
1. 
The boundaries of the area of benefit;
2. 
The cost of the project, whether actual or estimated;
3. 
A fair method of allocation of cost to the area of benefit; and
4. 
Shall establish the fee apportionment for the area benefited.
B. 
The director of public works shall cause a description of the boundaries of the area of benefit, the cost, whether actual or estimated, and the method of apportionment established at the hearing to be incorporated in a resolution of the board, and a certified copy of such resolution shall be recorded with the county recorder.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
A. 
The method of fee apportionment in the case of major thoroughfares shall not provide for higher fees on land which abuts the proposed improvements, except where the abutting properties are provided direct usable access to major thoroughfares.
B. 
The apportioned fees adopted by the board shall be applicable to all property within the area of benefit, and shall be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building permit for such property or portions thereof.
C. 
Where the area of benefit includes lands not subject to the payment of fees pursuant to this section, the board shall make provisions for payment of the share of improvement cost apportioned to such lands from other sources.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
The apportioned fees provided in this chapter shall not be required unless:
A. 
The major thoroughfares are in addition to, or a reconstruction of, any existing major thoroughfares serving the area at the time of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit; or
B. 
The planned bridge facility is an original bridge serving the area or an addition to an existing bridge facility serving the area at the time of adoption of the boundaries of the benefit area. Such fees shall not be expended to reimburse the cost of existing bridge construction.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
A. 
Owners of property within the area to be benefited by the proposed improvement may file protests of the proposed benefit assessment up to the time of the close of the hearing.
B. 
If, within the time when protests may be filed, there is a written protest, filed with the clerk of the board, by the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be benefited by the improvement, and sufficient protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the area represented to less than one-half of that to be benefited, then the proposed proceeding shall be abandoned, and the board shall not, for a period of one year from the filing of that written protest, commence or carry on any proceeding for the same improvement or acquisition under the provisions of Government Code Section 66484.
C. 
Any protest may be withdrawn by the owner making the same, in writing, at any time prior to the conclusion of a public hearing held pursuant to this section.
D. 
If a majority protest is directed against only a portion of the improvement, then all further proceedings under the provisions of this section to construct that portion of the improvement so protested against shall be barred for a period of one year, but the board shall not be barred from commencing new proceedings not including any part of the improvement or acquisition so protested against.
E. 
The board may commence and carry on new proceedings for the construction of a portion of the improvements so protested against if it finds, by the affirmative vote of four-fifths of its members, that the owners of more than one-half of the area of the property to be benefited are in favor of going forward with such portion of the improvement or acquisition.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
A. 
There is established a "planned bridge facility fund" and a "major thoroughfare fund" for the purpose of receiving deposits of fees paid pursuant to this chapter.
B. 
The director of public works shall establish a separate fund for each planned bridge facility project or each planned major thoroughfare project. If the benefit area includes more than one bridge planned for construction, a single fund shall be established covering all of the bridge projects and benefit area.
C. 
Moneys deposited in the planned bridge facility fund and the major thoroughfare fund shall be expended solely for construction or reimbursement for construction of the improvement serving the area to be benefited and from which the fees comprising the fund were collected, or to reimburse Stanislaus County for the cost of constructing the improvement.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
The director of public works is authorized to accept considerations in lieu of the payment of fees as provided in this chapter.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)
The director of public works may advance moneys from the public works general fund allocation or road fund to pay the cost of constructing the improvements and reimburse the general fund or road fund for such advances from the planned bridge facility or major thoroughfare funds established by this chapter.
(Ord. CS 57 §1, 1984; Ord. CS 179 §1, 1986)