(Ord. 2025 § 2, 2011; Ord. 2051 § 2, 2012; Ord. 2106 § 2 (Exh. F), 2015; Ord. 2112 § 2 (Exh. B), 2015; Ord. 2140 § 2, 2017; Ord. 2166 § 1, 2018; Ord. 2218 § 2 (Exh. B), 2022Ord. 2235 § 2, 2023)
The purpose of the Willamette Greenway Zone is to protect, conserve,
enhance, and maintain the natural, scenic, historic, economic, and
recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River and major
courses flowing into the Willamette River.
The Willamette Greenway Zone is that area within the Willamette
Greenway plan boundary identified on the Zoning Map. The WG Zone is
in combination with the underlying zone.
All land use actions and any change or intensification of use, or development permitted in the underlying zone, are conditional uses, subject to the provisions of Section
19.905.
Prohibited uses:
A. Commercial, industrial and residential structures and residential
accessory structures exceeding 35 ft in height west of McLoughlin
Blvd;
B. Residential floating structures;
C. New private noncommercial boathouses or storage structures, including
temporary structures;
D. New private noncommercial docks exceeding 400 sq ft;
E. Grading and tree cutting is prohibited in the buffer, except as allowed
in Subsections 19.401.8.B.1 through 6.
"Change of use"
means making a different use of the land or water which requires
construction; alterations of the land, river bed, bank, water, or
other areas outside of existing buildings or structures; and which
substantially alters or affects the land or water. It does not include
a change of use of a building or other structure that does not substantially
alter or affect the land or water upon which it is situated. Landscaping,
construction of driveways, modifications of existing structures, the
construction or placement of such subsidiary structures or facilities
as are usual and necessary to the use and enjoyment of existing improvements
(such as swing sets and patios), the improvement of existing paved
recreation trails, or the construction of new, low-impact pathways
within parks shall not be considered a change of use.
"Develop, developing"
means activities which result in removal of substantial amounts
of vegetation or in the substantial alteration of natural site characteristics;
e.g., to construct or alter a structure, to conduct a mining operation,
to make a physical change in the use or appearance of land, to divide
land into parcels, to create or terminate rights of access.
"Diameter at breast height"
means the measurement of mature trees as measured at a height
4.5 ft above the mean ground level at the base of the tree. Trees
existing on slopes are measured at the lowest point of ground at the
base of the tree. If a tree splits into multiple trunks below 4.5
ft above ground level, the measurement is taken at its most narrow
point below the split.
"Floodway"
means the channel of the river and the adjacent land areas
that must be reserved to discharge the base flood without cumulatively
increasing the water surface elevation more than 1 ft (FEMA definition).
"Intensification"
means any change of use; or action which increases or expands
the area or amount of an existing use or the level of activity, including
remodeling the exterior of a structure if the remodeling substantially
alters the appearance of the structure. Maintenance and repair usual
and necessary for the continuance of an existing use is not an intensification
of use. Reasonable emergency procedures necessary for the safety or
the protection of property are not an intensification of use. Residential
use of lands within the WG Zone includes the practices and activities
customarily related to the use and enjoyment of one's home. Landscaping,
construction of driveways, modifications of existing structures, the
construction or placement of such subsidiary structures or facilities
as are usual and necessary to the use and enjoyment of existing improvements
(such as swing sets and patios), the improvement of existing paved
recreation trails, or the construction of new, low-impact pathways
within parks shall not be considered an intensification of use.
"Large trees"
means trees with at least a 6-in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
"Low-impact pathways"
means public recreational trails or public walkways located
a minimum of 150 ft from the top of Willamette riverbank and constructed
of permeable material if at-grade, up to 12 ft in width.
"Native vegetation"
means plant species indigenous to the Portland metropolitan
area, consisting of trees, shrubs, and ground cover, as identified
in the Portland plant list.
"Nonresidential floating structure"
means water-dependent or water-related structures, usually
made of wood or concrete and containing a flotation system of polystyrene
or similar materials, that ride on the river surface anchored by a
cable either to the river bed, to piling, or to the riverbank, for
uses including, but not limited to: public walks or river access not
associated with marina or moorage; waterski jumps; swimmer's resting
platform; storage of marine-related equipment or boat storage; or
boat fueling facility. Sometimes fully enclosed buildings are situated
atop the floating structure. Restaurants, snack bars, and the like
are included in this definition.
"Ordinary high water line"
means the line on the bank or shore to which the water ordinarily
rises annually. Ordinary high water shall be established by the Division
of State Lands (DSL) with reference to historical data, vegetation,
field observations, survey, or other generally accepted methods.
"Public access"
means facilities that enable the public to safely make physical
contact with the river and its environs.
"Residential floating structure"
(houseboat or floating home) means single- or multifamily
dwellings supported on the river by a flotation system, which may
include a system of piles, berths, walkways, and ramps. This is not
a water-dependent or water-related use.
"Riparian"
means related to, living, or located on the bank of a waterway.
"Riverbank"
means a land feature or constructed structure that serves
to contain the Waters of the river. It can be distinguished from upland
areas by the presence of riparian vegetation in close proximity to
flowing water. Usually the riverbank represents the limits of seasonal
high water and periodic flood waters.
"Security"
means any form of surety approved by the City Attorney, including,
but not limited to: performance bond, letter of credit, or cash escrow
account.
"View window"
means an area of unobstructed view. The width of a view window
shall be measured at the point where vegetation is removed.
"Water-dependent"
means a use or activity which can be carried out only on,
in, or adjacent to water areas because the use requires access to
the water body for waterborne transportation, recreation, energy production,
or source of water.
"Water-related"
means uses which are not directly dependent upon access to
a water body, but which provide goods or services that are directly
associated with water dependent land or waterway use, and which, if
not located adjacent to water, would result in a public loss of quality
in the goods or services offered. Except as necessary for Water-dependent
or water-related uses or facilities, residences, parking lots, spoil
and dump sites, roads and highways, restaurants, businesses, factories,
and trailer parks are not generally considered dependent on or related
to water location needs.
The following procedures shall govern the application of WG
zones:
A. In the WG Zone, all uses and their accessory uses are permitted subject to the provisions of Section
19.905, except as noted in Subsection 19.401.5.B and Subsection 19.401.5.D.
B. Willamette Greenway review is not required for any of the activities
listed below:
1. Changes to the interior of a building or alterations of buildings
or accessory structures that do not increase the size or alter the
configuration of the building or accessory structure footprint;
2. Normal maintenance and repair as necessary for an existing development;
3. Removal of plants listed as nuisance species on the Oregon Noxious
Weed List or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List;
4. Addition or modification of existing utility lines, wires, fixtures,
equipment, circuits, appliances, and conductors by public or municipal
utilities;
5. Flood emergency procedures, and maintenance and repair of existing
flood control facilities;
6. Placement of signs, markers, aids, etc., by a public agency to serve
the public;
7. Establishment of residential accessory structures or uses, such as lawns, gardens, and play areas, subject to the vegetation buffer requirements of Subsection
19.401.8;
8. Ordinary maintenance and repair of existing buildings, structures,
parking lots, or other site improvements;
9. Minor repairs or alterations to existing structures for which no
building permit is required;
10.
A change of use of a building or other structure that does not
substantially alter or affect the land or water upon which it is situated;
11.
Construction of driveways;
12.
Reasonable emergency procedures as necessary for the safety
or protection of property; and
13.
Other activities similar to those listed in "1" through "12" above. Such Director determinations, including a finding of consistency with Goal 15, shall be made in accordance with Section
19.903.
C. The Oregon Department of Parks and Recreation shall be notified of
a hearing on a conditional use in the WG Zone. The notice shall be
sent via "certified mail, return receipt requested."
D. A greenway conditional use is required for all intensification or change of use, or alteration of the vegetation buffer area, or development, as defined in this section. Landscaping, Construction of driveways, modifications of existing structures, or the construction or placement of such subsidiary structures or facilities as are usual and necessary to the use and enjoyment of existing improvements shall not be considered a change in use or intensification. Approval shall be granted only if the criteria in Subsection
19.401.6 are met.
E. Submittal Requirements
A vegetation/buffer plan must be submitted for each application for a greenway conditional use permit. A buffer plan is required only if the proposed development impacts the vegetation buffer defined in Subsection
19.401.8.
F. Written notice, including a copy of the application, will be sent
upon receipt to the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department by certified
mail—return receipt requested. The Oregon Division of State
Lands, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and State Marine Board
shall also be notified of each application.
G. Written notice shall be provided to the Oregon Division of State
Lands after the land use action is final for activities affecting
wetlands or submerged or submersible lands within the Willamette River
greenway. The notice shall include local government conditions of
approval.
The following will be taken into account in the consideration
of a conditional use:
A. Whether the land to be developed has been committed to an urban use,
as defined under the State Willamette River Greenway Plan;
B. Compatibility with the scenic, natural, historic, economic, and recreational
character of the river;
C. Protection of views both toward and away from the river;
D. Landscaping, aesthetic enhancement, open space, and vegetation between
the activity and the river, to the maximum extent practicable;
E. Public access to and along the river, to the greatest possible degree,
by appropriate legal means;
F. Emphasis on water-oriented and recreational uses;
G. Maintenance of or increase in views between the Willamette River
and downtown;
H. Protection of the natural environment according to regulations in Section
19.402;
I. Conformance to applicable Comprehensive Plan policies;
J. The request is consistent with applicable plans and programs of the
Division of State Lands;
K. A vegetation buffer plan meeting the conditions of Subsections 19.401.8.A
through C.
On a case-by-case basis, uses that are not water-dependent or water-related shall be evaluated according to criteria of Subsection
19.401.6 above so that they are directed away from the river. Existing and proposed uses that are water-dependent and water-oriented may be permitted near or at the water's edge subject to review of criteria in Subsection
19.401.6 above.
Private noncommercial docks are subject to the following requirements:
A. Only 1 dock is allowed per riverfront lot of record.
B. In areas designated as open water areas or special management areas
by the Division of State Lands, docks may be restricted or additional
requirements may be applied to docks. Restrictions or additional requirements
will be identified by DSL in their review of the Development application.
C. Private, noncommercial docks shall not exceed 400 sq ft (square footage
is measured as the width times the length of the outer edge of the
structure), with the following exceptions:
1. Legal nonconforming docks or boathouses;
2. Nonconforming structures may be altered or replaced pursuant to Chapter
19.800.
D. Docks, pilings, and walkways shall either be dark natural wood colors,
or painted dark earthtones (dark brown or green).
E. Private noncommercial docks shall not:
1. Restrict boat access to adjacent properties;
2. Interfere with the commercial navigational use of the river, including
transiting, turning, passing, and berthing movements;
3. Interfere with critical fish and wildlife habitat or fishing use
of the river as determined by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife;
nor
4. Significantly add to recreational boating congestion.
The WG Zone is intended to be temporary and will be replaced
by the Willamette Greenway Design Plan when it is completed. The Willamette
Greenway Design Plan is identified in the Comprehensive Plan of the
City.
(Ord. 2036 § 3, 2011; Ord. 2110 § 2 (Exh. G), 2015; Ord. 2140 § 2, 2017; Ord. 2161 § 2, 2018; Ord. 2166 § 1, 2018; Ord. 2218 § 2 (Exh. B), 2022)
Section
19.402 is to be interpreted consistently with the following:
A. Section
19.402 provides protection for water quality resources under Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 6 and Sections 1-4 of Title
3 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (UGMFP). Section
19.402 also provides protection for designated natural resources that have been identified for the purposes of implementing Statewide Planning Goal 5 relating to significant natural riparian, wildlife, and wetland resources and Title
13 of the UG-MFP.
B. Many of Milwaukie's riparian, wildlife, and wetland resources have
been adversely affected by development over time. These regulations
seek to minimize additional adverse impacts and to restore and improve
resources, where possible, while balancing property rights and Development
needs of the city.
C. It is also the intent of Section
19.402 to:
1. Designate water quality resources (WQRs) to protect the functions
and values of riparian and wetland resources at the time of development.
2. Protect and improve the functions and values that contribute to water
quality and to fish and wildlife habitat in urban streamside areas.
These functions and values include, but are not limited to:
a.
Vegetated corridors to separate protected water features from
Development.
c.
Streamflow moderation and water storage.
d.
Water filtration, infiltration, and natural purification.
e.
Bank stabilization and sediment and pollution control.
f.
Large wood recruitment and retention and natural channel dynamics.
g.
Organic material resources.
3. Designate habitat conservation areas (HCAs) to implement the performance
standards of Title 13 of the UGMFP for riparian areas and fish and
wildlife habitat, and to protect significant local Goal 5 resources
such as wetlands.
4. Provide nondiscretionary (clear and objective) standards, as well
as a discretionary review process, applicable to development in HCAs,
in accordance with Goal 5.
5. Allow and encourage habitat-friendly development while minimizing
the impact on water quality and fish and wildlife habitat functions.
6. Permit residential cluster development to encourage creative and
flexible site design that is sensitive to the land's natural features
and adapts to the natural topography.
7. Provide mitigation standards for the replacement of ecological functions
and values lost through development in WQRs and HCAs. This includes
restoration of designated natural resources that are temporarily disturbed
during development, as well as mitigation for permanent disturbance
of those areas as a result of development.
8. Preserve existing native vegetation against removal and replacement
with lawns, gardens, or other nonnative plantings.
D. Section
19.402 allows development in situations where adverse impacts from the Development can be avoided or mitigated and where the strict application of these rules would deny reasonable economic use of property.
E. It is not the intent of Section
19.402 to:
1. Impose any obligation on property owners to restore existing developed
sites to preDevelopment or natural conditions when no new activity
is proposed.
2. Impose any unreasonable hardship against the continued maintenance
of existing legal site conditions.
3. Apply to activities that do not affect WQRs or HCAs.
4. Prohibit normal lawn and yard landscape planting and maintenance
that does not involve removal and replacement of existing native vegetation.
Normal lawn and yard planting and maintenance does not include the
planting of invasive nonnative or noxious vegetation, including, but
not limited to, plants listed as nuisance species on the Oregon Noxious
Weed List or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List established in Subsection
19.402.2.G.
Title 19 Zoning is comprised of regulations that deal with the
use of land; it does not extend into the broader realm of laws that
regulate personal activities unrelated to land use and development.
Given such limitations, the following activities are prohibited within
WQRs and HCAs:
A. New structures, development, or landscaping activity other than those allowed by Section
19.402.
B. Uncontained areas of hazardous materials, as defined by DEQ.
C. Planting any vegetation listed as a nuisance species on the Oregon
Noxious Weed List or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List.
D. Outside storage of materials; unless such storage began before September 15, 2011, the effective date of Ordinance #2036; or unless such storage is approved according to the applicable provisions of Section
19.402.
E. Application of pesticides or herbicides with any of the active ingredients
listed on the Milwaukie Prohibited Chemicals List.
Within either WQRs or HCAs, the following activities and items are subject to Type I review per Section
19.1004:
A. Limited Tree Removal
1. The Planning Manager may approve an application for limited tree removal or major pruning within WQRs and HCAs when the applicable requirements in Chapter
16.32 are met, except where exempted by Subsection 19.402.6.A.2, under any of the following circumstances:
a.
The tree removal is necessary to eliminate a hazardous, nonemergency
situation, as determined by the Planning Manager. A situation may
be deemed hazardous if a tree, or portion of a tree, has undergone
a recent change in health or condition in a manner that may pose a
danger to people, to structures on private property, to public or
private utilities, or to travel on private property or in the public
right-of-way. Examples of imminent hazards may include, but are not
limited to, trees that are broken, split, cracked, uprooted, or otherwise
in danger of collapse. Approval shall be limited to removal of the
tree, or portion of the tree, as necessary to eliminate the hazard.
b.
The tree is dead, diseased, or dying and cannot be saved, as
determined and documented in a report by a certified arborist.
c.
The proposal would remove more than 3 trees during any 12-month
period that are categorized as nuisance species on the Oregon Noxious
Weed List or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List.
d.
The tree is a downed tree, but more than 150 sq ft of earth
disturbance is necessary to remove it.
e.
The tree is a nuisance species, but more than 150 sq ft of earth
disturbance is necessary to remove it.
f.
The tree is not categorized as either a nuisance or native species on the Oregon Noxious Weed List or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List and is not located in a WQR categorized as Class A ("Good"), according to Table 19.402.11.C, provided that no more than 3 such trees will be removed during any 12-month period, and complies with the applicable requirements in Chapter
16.32.
g.
For major pruning, as defined in Section
19.201, a certified arborist has determined, and documented in a report, that the tree will survive the proposed pruning.
2. The provisions of Subsection 19.402.6.A.1 do not apply to tree removal proposed in association with development or other activities regulated by Section
19.402, for which other approval criteria and mitigation standards may apply.
3. The Planning Manager shall require the application to comply with
all of the following standards:
a.
A construction management plan shall be prepared in accordance with Subsection
19.402.9. When earth disturbance is necessary for the Approved removal or pruning, all open soil areas that result from the disturbance shall be replanted and/or protected from erosion.
b.
All pruning and/or tree removal shall be done in accordance with the standards of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and complies with the applicable requirements in Chapter
16.32.
c.
Any tree that is removed in accordance with Subsection 19.402.6.A
shall be replaced with a new tree, of at least ½-in caliper
or at least 6-ft overall height after planting. An exception to this
requirement may be granted if the applicant demonstrates that a replacement
tree has already been planted, in anticipation of tree removal, or
if the existing site conditions otherwise preclude tree replacement
(due to existing dense canopy coverage or other ecological reasons).
d.
The replacement tree(s) shall be located in the general vicinity
of the removed tree(s), somewhere within the designated natural resource
(WQR or HCA). The replacement tree(s) does not have to be a native
species; but, in accordance with Subsection 19.402.5.C, the replacement
tree(s) shall not be categorized as a nuisance species on the Oregon
Noxious Weed List or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List. The property owner
shall ensure that the replacement tree(s) survives at least 2 years
beyond the date of its planting.
B. Activities within HCAs in Compliance with Nondiscretionary Standards
Within HCAs, but outside of WQRs, nonexempt development that is not listed in Subsections
19.402.7 or
19.402.8, and that is in compliance with the nondiscretionary standards provided in Subsection 19.402.11.D, is subject to Type I review.
C. Natural Resource Management Plans
Natural resource management plans that meet the standards outlined
in Subsection 19.402.10.A are subject to Type I review. These are
typically plans that have already been approved by a qualified agency.
D. Maintenance of Existing Utility Facilities
Routine repair and maintenance of existing utility facilities,
accesses, streets, driveways, and/or parking improvements that disturbs
a WQR and/or HCA is subject to Type I review, provided such activities
can meet the general standards for special uses established in Subsection
19.402.11.E.1. These include, but are not limited to, the requirement
to provide a mitigation plan and to restore the disturbed area.
E. Utility Connections
Unless they are exempt per Subsection
19.402.4, connections to existing or new utility lines that involve disturbance to a WQR and/or HCA are subject to Type I review against the following criteria:
1. The activities required to establish the connection shall not disturb
a protected water feature. Utility connections that will disturb a
protected water feature are subject to the review procedures for special
uses established in Subsection 19.402.11.E.
2. The activities required to establish the connection shall not disturb
an area greater than 10 ft wide.
3. The connection can meet the general standards for special uses established
in SubSection 19.402.11.E.1.
F. Nuisance Abatement
Measures to remove or abate nuisances; or any other violation
of State statute, Administrative agency rule, or City or County ordinance;
shall be subject to Type I review of a construction management plan,
to be approved by the Planning Director prior to the abatement activity.
The person or agency undertaking the action shall repair any impacts
to the designated natural resource resulting from the nuisance or
violation (e.g., restore disturbed soils, restore hydrologic connections,
replant disturbed areas with native vegetation, etc.) unless subsequent
development has been approved.
G. Boundary Verification
Boundary verifications that propose minor corrections will be
processed in accordance with Subsection 19.402.15.A.1 and are subject
to Type I review.
Within either WQRs or HCAs, the following activities and items are subject to Type II review and approval by the Planning Director per Section
19.1005, unless they are otherwise exempt or permitted as a Type I activity.
A. Special Uses
If not listed as exempt in Subsection
19.402.4, and not able to meet the nondiscretionary standards for HCAs as established in Subsection 19.402.11.D, any special use activity listed below shall be subject to Type II review if the proposal complies with the applicable standards provided in Subsection 19.402.11.E:
1. Improvement or construction of public or private utility facilities.
2. New stormwater facilities.
4. Stormwater management plans.
If the proposed special use activity is not in compliance with the applicable standards in Subsection 19.402.11.E, it shall be subject to Type III review and the general discretionary review criteria provided in Subsection 19.402.12.
|
B. Natural Resource Management Plans
Natural resource management plans that do not meet the Type
I review standards provided in Subsection 19.402.10.A, but that meet
the standards provided in Subsection 19.402.10.B, are subject to Type
II review. These are typically plans that have been prepared independently
of a qualified agency but that are in accordance with standards and
guidelines related to enhancing natural resources.
C. Partitions
Partitions that meet the standards provided in Subsection 19.402.13.G
are subject to Type II review.
D. Other Uses and Activities with Minimal Impacts to WQRs
The activities listed below are subject to Type II review and the general discretionary review criteria provided in Subsection
19.402.12:
1. New agricultural practices or uses, excluding buildings and structures,
that result in increased direct stormwater discharges to WQRs.
2. Landscaping and maintenance of existing landscaping that would increase
impervious area within a WQR by no more than 150 sq ft and/or would
result in increased direct stormwater discharges to the WQR.
3. Routine repair and maintenance, alteration, and/or total replacement
of existing legal buildings or structures that increases the existing
disturbance area by no more than 150 sq ft within the WQR.
4. Routine repair and maintenance, alteration, and/or total replacement
of existing utility facilities, accesses, streets, driveways, and
parking improvements that increases the existing disturbance area
by no more than 150 sq ft within the WQR. Activities approved under
this subsection shall be subject to the following requirements:
a.
Restore the disturbed portion of the WQR.
b.
Within the disturbed portion of the WQR, remove any vegetation
categorized as a nuisance species on the Oregon Noxious Weed List
or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List and replace it with native vegetation
from the list.
E. Boundary Verification
Boundary verifications that propose substantial corrections
will be processed in accordance with Subsection 19.402.15.A.2 and
are subject to Type II review.
Within either WQRs or HCAs, the following activities are subject to Type III review and approval by the Planning Commission under Section
19.1006, unless they are otherwise exempt or permitted as a Type I or II activity.
A. The activities listed below shall be subject to the general discretionary review criteria provided in Subsection
19.402.12:
1. Any activity allowed in the base zone that is not otherwise exempt
or permitted as a Type I or II activity.
2. Within HCAs, development that is not in compliance with the nondiscretionary
standards provided in Subsection 19.402.11.D.
3. New roads to provide access to protected water features, necessary
ingress and egress across WQRs, or the widening of an existing road.
4. Improvement of existing public utility facilities that cannot meet
the applicable standards of Subsection 19.402.11.E.
5. New stormwater facilities that cannot meet the applicable standards
of Subsection 19.402.11.E.
6. New public or private utility facility construction that cannot meet
the applicable standards of Subsection 19.402.11.E.
7. Walkways and bike paths that are not exempt per Subsection
19.402.4 or cannot meet the applicable standards of Subsection 19.402.11.E.
8. Tree removal in excess of that permitted under Subsection
19.402.4 or
19.402.6. Tree removal must also comply with the requirements in Chapter
16.32.
9. Landscaping and maintenance of existing landscaping that would increase
impervious area by more than 150 sq ft.
10.
Routine repair and maintenance, alteration, and/or total replacement
of existing legal buildings or structures that increases the existing
disturbance area by more than 150 sq ft within the WQR.
11.
Routine repair and maintenance, alteration, and/or total replacement
of existing utility facilities, accesses, streets, driveways, and
parking improvements that would disturb more than 150 sq ft within
the WQR.
B. The activities listed below shall be subject to the review criteria
for partitions and subdivisions provided in Subsections 19.402.13.H
and I, respectively:
1. The partitioning of land containing a WQR or HCA that cannot meet
the standards provided in Subsection 19.402.13.G.
2. The subdividing of land containing a WQR or HCA.
Natural resource management plans or restoration plans that
authorize limited disturbance within the WQR or HCA may be approved
with Type I or II review, subject to the following standards:
A. Plans Eligible for Type I Review
The plan has already been approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), DSL, Oregon
Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), Metro, Clackamas County Soil and
Water Conservation District, or other agency approved by the Planning
Director.
B. Plans Eligible for Type II Review
The plan has been prepared in accordance with particular standards
and guidelines promulgated by a natural resource agency, such as OWEB's
Oregon Aquatic Habitat Restoration and Enhancement Guide, ODFW's Western
Oregon Stream Restoration Program, DSL's Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) approach
of assessment for wetland and riparian functions, or other standards
approved by the Planning Director.
C. Approval Criteria
Every plan prepared for approval under Section
19.402 shall demonstrate that it encourages restoration activities that have any of the following effects:
1. Changes the trend of habitat function from one of a diminishing ability
to support salmonids and other organisms to one that supports a complex,
self-sustaining system.
2. Corrects or improves conditions caused by past management and/or
disturbance events.
3. Maximizes beneficial habitat in the short term where watershed degradation
has been extensive and natural processes will need substantial time
to restore habitat.
4. Creates beneficial habitat and restores stream function and hydrology
to the fullest extent practicable within developed areas where there
is no reasonable expectation of returning to natural conditions.
D. Construction Management Plans
A construction management plan prepared in accordance with Subsection
19.402.9 is required with each natural resource management plan.
E. Ongoing Maintenance
Natural resource management plans shall demonstrate how ongoing
maintenance is part of the associated restoration or enhancement activities.
F. Expiration of Plans
The approval of a natural resource management plan shall be
valid for 5 years. Approved plans may be renewed through the Type
I review process by demonstrating that the original approved plan
still meets the criteria provided in Subsection 19.402.10.C. Plans
that demonstrate an adaptive management component and/or that involve
partnership with one of the agencies noted in Subsection 19.402.10.A
may be approved as valid for up to 20 years upon request.
This subsection establishes a discretionary process by which
the City shall analyze the impacts of development on WQRs and HCAs,
including measures to prevent negative impacts and requirements for
mitigation and enhancement. The Planning Director may consult with
a professional with appropriate expertise to evaluate an application,
or they may rely on appropriate staff expertise to properly evaluate
the report's conclusions.
A. Impact Evaluation and Alternatives Analysis
An impact evaluation and alternatives analysis is required to
determine compliance with the approval criteria for general discretionary
review and to evaluate Development alternatives for a particular property.
A report presenting this evaluation and analysis shall be prepared
and signed by a knowledgeable and qualified natural resource professional,
such as a wildlife biologist, botanist, or hydrologist. At the Planning
Director's discretion, the requirement to provide such a report may
be waived for small projects that trigger discretionary review but
can be evaluated without professional assistance.
The alternatives shall be evaluated on the basis of their impact
on WQRs and HCAs, the ecological functions provided by the resource
on the property, and offsite impacts within the subwatershed (6th
Field Hydrologic Unit Code) where the property is located. The evaluation
and analysis shall include the following:
1. Identification of the ecological functions of riparian habitat found
on the property, as described in Subsection 19.402.1.C.2.
2. An inventory of vegetation, sufficient to categorize the existing
condition of the WQR per Table 19.402.11.C, including the percentage
of ground and canopy coverage materials within the WQR.
3. An assessment of the water quality impacts related to the development,
including sediments, temperature and nutrients, sediment control,
and temperature control, or any other condition with the potential
to cause the protected water feature to be listed on DEQ's 303(d)
list.
4. An alternatives analysis, providing an explanation of the rationale
behind choosing the alternative selected, listing measures that will
be taken to avoid and/or minimize adverse impacts to designated natural
resources, and demonstrating that:
a.
No practicable alternatives to the requested development exist
that will not disturb the WQR or HCA.
b.
Development in the WQR and/or HCA has been limited to the area
necessary to allow for the proposed use.
c.
If disturbed, the WQR can be restored to an equal or better
condition in accordance with Table 19.402.11.C; and the HCA can be
restored consistent with the mitigation requirements of Subsection
19.402.11.D.2.
d.
Road crossings will be minimized as much as possible.
5. Evidence that the applicant has done the following, for applications
proposing routine repair and maintenance, alteration, and/or total
replacement of existing structures located within the WQR:
a.
Demonstrated that no practicable alternative design or method
of Development exists that would have a lesser impact on the WQR than
the one proposed. If no such practicable alternative design or method
of development exists, the project shall be conditioned to limit its
disturbance and impact on the WQR to the minimum extent necessary
to achieve the proposed repair/maintenance, alteration, and/or replacement.
b.
Provided mitigation to ensure that impacts to the functions
and values of the WQR will be mitigated or restored to the extent
practicable.
6. A mitigation plan for the designated natural resource that contains
the following information:
a.
A description of adverse impacts that will be caused as a result
of Development.
b.
An explanation of measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize,
and/or mitigate adverse impacts to the designated natural resource;
in accordance with, but not limited to, Table 19.402.11.C for WQRs
and Subsection 19.402.11.D.2 for HCAs.
c.
Sufficient description to demonstrate how the following standards
will be achieved:
(1)
Where existing vegetation has been removed, the site shall be
revegetated as soon as practicable.
(2)
Where practicable, lights shall be placed so that they do not
shine directly into any WQR and/or HCA location. The type, size, and
intensity of lighting shall be selected so that impacts to habitat
functions are minimized.
(3)
Areas of standing trees, shrubs, and natural vegetation will
remain connected or contiguous; particularly along natural drainage
courses, except where mitigation is approved; so as to provide a transition
between the proposed development and the designated natural resource
and to provide opportunity for food, water, and cover for animals
located within the WQR.
d.
A map showing where the specific mitigation activities will occur. Off-site mitigation related to WQRs shall not be used to meet the mitigation requirements of Section
19.402.
e.
An implementation schedule; including a timeline for construction,
Mitigation, mitigation maintenance, monitoring, and reporting; as
well as a contingency plan. All in-stream work in fish-bearing streams
shall be done in accordance with the allowable windows for in-water
work as designated by ODFW.
B. Approval Criteria
1. Unless specified elsewhere in Section
19.402, applications subject to the discretionary review process shall demonstrate how the proposed activity complies with the following criteria:
a.
Avoid
The proposed activity avoids the intrusion of development into
the WQR and/or HCA to the extent practicable. The proposed activity
shall have less detrimental impact to the designated natural resource
than other practicable alternatives, including significantly different
practicable alternatives that propose less development within the
resource area.
b.
Minimize
If the applicant demonstrates that there is no practicable alternative
that will avoid disturbance of the designated natural resource, then
the proposed activity within the resource area shall minimize detrimental
impacts to the extent practicable.
(1)
The proposed activity shall minimize detrimental impacts to
ecological functions and loss of habitat, consistent with uses allowed
by right under the base zone, to the extent practicable.
(2)
To the extent practicable within the designated natural resource,
the proposed activity shall be designed, located, and constructed
to:
(a) Minimize grading, removal of native vegetation,
and disturbance and removal of native soils; by using the approaches
described in Subsection 19.402.11.A, reducing building footprints,
and using minimal excavation foundation systems (e.g., pier, post,
or piling foundation).
(b) Minimize adverse hydrological impacts on water
resources.
(c) Minimize impacts on wildlife corridors and fish
passage.
(d) Allow for use of other techniques to further minimize
the impacts of development in the resource area; such as using native
plants throughout the site (not just in the resource area), locating
other required landscaping adjacent to the resource area, reducing
light spill-off into the resource area from development, preserving
and maintaining existing trees and tree canopy coverage, and/or planting
trees where appropriate to maximize future tree canopy coverage.
c.
Mitigate
If the applicant demonstrates that there is no practicable alternative
that will avoid disturbance of the designated natural resource, then
the proposed activity shall mitigate for adverse impacts to the resource
area. All proposed mitigation plans shall meet the following standards:
(1)
The mitigation plan shall demonstrate that it compensates for
detrimental impacts to the ecological functions of resource areas,
after taking into consideration the applicant's efforts to minimize
such detrimental impacts.
(2)
Mitigation shall occur on the site of the disturbance, to the
extent practicable. Off-site mitigation for disturbance of WQRs shall
not be approved. Off-site mitigation for disturbance of HCAs shall
be approved if the applicant has demonstrated that it is not practicable
to complete the mitigation on-site and if the applicant has documented
that they can carry out and ensure the success of the off-site mitigation
as outlined in Subsection 19.402.11.B.5.
In addition, if the off-site mitigation area is not within the
same subwatershed (6th Field Hydrologic Unit Code) as the related
disturbed HCA, the applicant shall demonstrate that it is not practicable
to complete the mitigation within the same subwatershed and that,
considering the purpose of the mitigation, the mitigation will provide
more ecological functional value if implemented outside of the subwatershed.
(3)
All revegetation plantings shall use native plants listed on
the Oregon Noxious Weed List or Milwaukie Invasive Tree List.
(4)
All in-stream work in fish-bearing streams shall be done in
accordance with the allowable windows for in-water work as designated
by ODFW.
(5)
A mitigation maintenance plan shall be included and shall be
sufficient to ensure the success of the planting. Compliance with
the plan shall be a condition of development approval.
2. Municipal Water Utility Facilities Standards
In addition to all other applicable criteria of Subsection 19.402.12.B, and if not already exempted by Subsection
19.402.4; municipal potable water, stormwater, and wastewater utility facilities (which may include, but are not limited to, water treatment plants, wastewater treatment plants, raw water intakes, pump stations, transmission mains, conduits or service lines, terminal storage reservoirs, and outfall devices) may be built, expanded, repaired, maintained, reconfigured, rehabilitated, replaced, or upsized in accordance with the following criteria:
a.
Such projects shall not be required to avoid the resource area
per SubSection 19.402.12.B.1.a, provided that, where practicable,
the project does not encroach closer to a protected water feature
than existing operations and development; or, for new projects where
there are no existing operations or development, provided that the
project does not encroach closer to a Protected water feature than
practicable.
b.
Best management practices will be employed that accomplish all
of the following:
(1)
Account for watershed assessment information in project design.
(2)
Minimize the trench area and tree removal within the resource
area.
(3)
Utilize and maintain erosion controls until other site stabilization
measures are established, post-construction.
(4)
Replant immediately after backfilling, or as soon as effective.
(5)
Preserve wetland soils and retain soil profiles.
(6)
Minimize compactions and the duration of the work within the
resource area.
(7)
Complete in-water construction during appropriate seasons, or
as approved within requisite federal or State permits.
(8)
Monitor water quality during the construction phases, if applicable.
(9)
Implement a full inspection and monitoring program during and
after project completion, if applicable.
C. Limitations and Mitigation for Disturbance of HCAs
1. Discretionary Review to Approve Additional Disturbance within an
HCA
An applicant seeking discretionary approval to disturb more
of an HCA than is allowed by Subsection 19.402.11.D.1 shall submit
an Impact Evaluation and Alternatives Analysis, as outlined in Subsection
19.402.12.A, and shall be subject to the approval criteria provided
in Subsection 19.402.12.B.
An applicant may use the nondiscretionary mitigation options
presented in Subsection 19.402.11.D.2 as a guide for proposing mitigation
measures that will then be evaluated against the approval criteria
provided in Subsection 19.402.12.B.
2. Discretionary Review to Approve Mitigation that Varies the Number
and Size of Trees and Shrubs within an HCA
An applicant seeking discretionary approval to proportionally vary the number and size of trees and shrubs required to be planted under Subsection 19.402.11.D.2 (e.g., to plant fewer larger trees and shrubs or to plant more smaller trees and shrubs), but who will comply with all other applicable provisions of Subsection
19.402.11, shall be subject to the following process:
a.
The applicant shall submit the following information:
(1)
A calculation of the number and size of trees and shrubs the
applicant would be required to plant under Subsection 19.402.11.D.2.
(2)
The number and size of trees and shrubs that the applicant proposes
to plant.
(3)
An explanation of how the proposed number and size of trees
and shrubs will achieve, at the end of the third year after initial
planting, comparable or better mitigation results than would be achieved
if the applicant complied with all of the requirements of Subsection
19.402.11.D.2. Such explanation shall be prepared and signed by a
knowledgeable and qualified natural resource professional or a certified
landscape architect. It shall include discussion of site preparation
including soil additives, removal of invasive and noxious vegetation,
plant diversity, plant spacing, and planting season; and immediate
post-planting care, including mulching, irrigation, wildlife protection,
and weed control.
(4)
A mitigation, site-monitoring, and site-reporting plan.
(5)
An explanation of how the applicable requirements in Chapter
16.32 will also be met.
b.
Approval of the request shall be based on consideration of the
following:
(1)
Whether the proposed planting will achieve, at the end of the
third year after initial planting, comparable or better mitigation
results than would be achieved if the applicant complied with all
of the requirements of Subsection 19.402.11.D.2.
(2)
Whether the proposed mitigation adequately addresses the plant
diversity, plant survival, and monitoring practices established in
Subsection 19.402.11.B.
(3)
Whether the applicable requirements in Chapter
16.32 will also be met.
The following standards apply to property line adjustments and all forms of land division defined in Chapter
17.08. These standards apply in addition to the applicable requirements provided in Title
17 Land Division and elsewhere in Title
19 Zoning. Lot consolidations, as defined in Chapter
17.08, are not subject to the provisions of Section
19.402.
A. Boundary Verification
Whether or not an applicant believes the NR Administrative Map is accurate, the applicant shall verify the boundaries of the WQR and HCA on the property according to Subsection
19.402.15.
B. Construction Management Plans
1. In accordance with Subsection
19.402.9, a construction management plan is required for applications for land division that will require physical site improvements (e.g., grading and/or construction of structures, streets, or utilities) within, or within 100 ft of, a WQR or HCA.
2. A construction management plan is not required for applications for
land division that do not require grading; constructing structures,
streets, or utilities; or making other physical improvements to the
site.
C. Impacts from Site Improvements
Applications for land division that will require physical site improvements (e.g., grading and/or the construction of streets, sidewalks, culverts, bridges, or utilities) within a WQR or HCA shall comply with the relevant standards for disturbance limitation and mitigation provided in Subsections
19.402.11 and/or
19.402.12, as applicable.
D. Mitigation for Future Structures or Improvements
Applications proposing a division of land on which future construction
may impact a WQR or HCA shall comply with one of the following two
standards:
1. Complete the mitigation requirements for any impacts to the WQR or HCA, in accordance with the requirements of Section
19.402, thereby exempting all subsequent Development on lots containing a WQR and/or HCA from further review if in compliance with the related approval. When mitigation is required for new streets created as part of a subdivision, as outlined in Subsection 19.402.13.I, such mitigation shall be completed prior to approval of the final plat for the subdivision, unless the Planning Commission's approval establishes a different schedule.
2. Not complete the mitigation requirements, thus requiring that any subsequent Development be subject to review under Section
19.402.
E. Property Line Adjustments
Applications for property line adjustment, when any of the properties
include HCAs, shall address the resulting change in the percentage
of HCA coverage on each property and demonstrate compliance with one
of the following standards:
1. The proposed property line adjustment will result in no more than
a 30-point difference in the percentage of HCA coverage on each property.
Such an adjustment shall be subject to the Type I review process.
2. The proposed property line adjustment will not contravene a condition
of approval related to HCA distribution from a previously approved
land division. Such an adjustment shall be subject to the Type I review
process.
3. The proposed property line adjustment cannot meet the standard of
Subsection 19.402.13.E.1, above, but will result in the smallest practicable
difference in the percentage of HCA coverage on each property. Furthermore,
the new boundary configuration will mitigate, to the extent practicable,
the potential future impacts to the HCA from access and development.
Such an adjustment shall be subject to the Type II review process.
F. Replats
For the purpose of compliance with Section
19.402, replats that result in 3 or fewer lots shall be processed as partitions; replats that result in 4 or more lots shall be processed as subdivisions.
G. Low-Impact Partitions
Applications for partitions are subject to Type II review if
they demonstrate compliance with the following standards:
1. For properties that contain HCAs, but no WQRs, and where the HCA
covers 85% or less of the total lot area, the partition shall achieve
either of the following results:
a.
There shall be no more than a 30-point difference in the percentage
of HCA coverage on each of the new parcels. For example, a 2-lot partition
that would produce one parcel that is 55% HCA and the other that is
30% HCA is permissible with Type II review; whereas, a 2-lot partition
that would produce one parcel that is 75% HCA and the other that is
40% HCA is not permissible with Type II review and shall be subject
to the standards of Subsection 19.402.13.H.
b.
At least 90% of the original property's HCA is on a separate
unbuildable parcel, protected by a conservation restriction.
2. For properties that contain WQRs, the applicant shall place 100%
of the WQR in a separate unbuildable tract, protected by a conservation
restriction.
3. For properties that contain both WQRs and HCAs, the applicant shall
comply with both of the standards listed above in Subsections 19.402.13.G.1
and 2.
4. For properties where the HCA covers more than 85% of the total lot
area, the proposed partition shall be subject to the standards and
review process established in Subsection 19.402.13.H.
H. All Other Partitions
Applications for partitions that cannot comply with Subsection
19.402.13.G are subject to Type III review and shall comply with one
of the following two standards:
1. For properties that do not contain any WQRs, but for which it is not practicable to comply with the partition standards in Subsection 19.402.13.G.1, and where the HCA covers 85% or less of the total lot area, the application shall meet the following standards and is not subject to the requirements of Subsection
19.402.12:
a.
The partition plan shall result in the smallest practicable
percentage point difference in HCA coverage on the parcels created
by the partition.
b.
To the extent practicable, the parcel configuration shall mitigate
the potential future impacts to the HCA from access and development.
2. For properties that contain WQRs but cannot comply with Subsection
19.402.13.G.2, that contain both WQRs and HCAs but cannot comply with
Subsection 19.402.13.G.3, or where the HCA covers more than 85% of
the total lot area, the application shall comply with the following
standards:
a.
To the extent practicable, the parcel configuration shall mitigate
the potential future impacts to WQRs from access and development.
b.
An Impact Evaluation and Alternatives Analysis shall be prepared
in accordance with the relevant portions of Subsection 19.402.12.A.
c.
For properties where the HCA covers more than 85% of the total
lot area, the Impact Evaluation and Alternatives Analysis shall address
how the applicant's proposal retains the greatest practicable degree
of contiguity of the HCA across the new parcels.
I. Subdivisions
Applications for subdivisions are subject to Type III review
and shall comply with one of the following two standards:
1. At least 90% of the property's HCA and 100% of the property's WQR shall be located in a separate tract. Applications that meet this standard are not subject to the discretionary review requirements of Subsection
19.402.12.
2. If a subdivision cannot comply with the standards in Subsection 19.402.13.I.1,
the application shall comply with the following standards:
a.
All proposed lots shall have adequate buildable area outside
of the WQR and HCA.
b.
To the extent practicable, the lot and access configurations
shall mitigate the potential future impacts to the WQR and HCA from
access and Development.
c.
An Impact Evaluation and Alternatives Analysis shall be prepared
in accordance with the relevant portions of Subsection 19.402.12.A.
d.
For properties where the HCA covers more than 85% of the total
lot area, the Impact Evaluation and Alternatives Analysis shall address
how the applicant's proposal retains the greatest practicable degree
of contiguity of the HCA across the new lots.
J. Resource Area as a Separate Tract
Where required by Section
19.402, the new subdivision or partition plat shall delineate and show all WQRs and HCAs as being located in a separate unbuildable tract(s) according to the following process:
1. Prior to preliminary plat approval, the designated natural resource
(whether WQR, HCA, or both) shall be shown as a separate tract(s),
which shall not be part of any lot or parcel used for construction
of any structures.
2. Prior to final plat approval, ownership of the separate natural resource
tract(s) shall be identified to distinguish it from lots or parcels
intended for sale. Ownership in common or by a homeowners association
is strongly discouraged. The tract(s) may be identified as any one
of the following:
a.
Private natural area held by the owner with a restrictive covenant
and/or conservation easement.
b.
For residential subdivisions, private natural area subject to an easement conveying storm and surface water management rights to the City of Milwaukie, Clackamas County Water Environment Services, and/or any other relevant jurisdiction, and preventing the owner of the tract from activities and uses inconsistent with the purposes of Section
19.402.
c.
Public natural area where the tract has been dedicated to the
City of Milwaukie or a private nonprofit with the mission of land
conservation.
3. The boundaries of all such separate tracts shall be demarcated with
stakes, flags, or some similar means so that the boundaries between
tracts and adjacent properties are defined in perpetuity. Fences that
prevent the unfettered passage of wildlife shall not be installed
along the boundary of any tract.
To encourage applicants to avoid or minimize impacts to WQRs
and/or HCAs, several types of adjustments and variances are available
for use on any property that includes a WQR or HCA. These include
adjustments to specific base zone and lot design standards, discretionary
variances, and allowances for residential cluster development.
A. Adjustments
The adjustments provided in Subsection 19.402.14.A shall not be used to avoid the requirement to submit a construction management plan, if deemed applicable per Subsection
19.402.3. The following adjustments are allowed by right as part of any Type I, II, or III application:
1. Adjustments to Base Zone Standards
a.
Yard Setback (General)
Yard setback standards may be adjusted by up to 10%. This allowance applies only to the yard requirements established in base zones and does not apply to additional yard requirements for conditional uses or community service uses, yard exceptions established in Subsection
19.501.2, or Transition area measures established in Subsection
19.504.6.
b.
Rear Yard Setback (Limited)
For residential development, if the subject property is adjacent
to a separate tract that was established according to the standards
of Subsection 19.402.13.J, and the tract is adjacent to the rear yard
of the subject property, the minimum rear yard requirement may be
reduced to 10 ft.
2. Adjustments to Lot Design Standards
When property boundaries are changed and/or land divided per
Title 17 Land Division, an applicant may utilize the following adjustments
to avoid or minimize impacts to a WQR or HCA:
a.
The minimum base zone standards for lot width and lot depth
may be reduced by up to 10%.
b.
The minimum lot frontage required on a public street may be
reduced by up to 10%.
B. Variances
1. Requests to vary any standards beyond the adjustments allowed in Subsections 19.402.14.A or B shall be subject to the review process and approval criteria for variances established in Section
19.911.
2. In granting any variance request related to Section
19.402, the Planning Commission may impose such conditions as are deemed necessary to minimize adverse impacts that may result from granting the variance. Examples of such conditions include, but are not limited to, maintaining a minimum width of the vegetated corridor alongside a primary protected water feature and limiting the amount of WQR for which the adjacent vegetated corridor width can be reduced.
C. Residential Cluster Development
For residential proposals, development may be clustered so that land can be developed at allowed densities while avoiding or minimizing impacts to WQRs or HCAs. The intent of this section is to encourage creative and flexible site design that enables the allowable density to be transferred elsewhere on a site to protect environmentally sensitive areas and preserve open space and natural features. A residential cluster development may be permitted in any residential or mixed-use zoning district, subject to Type III review and approval by the Planning Commission. A cluster development proposal may be considered in conjunction with a proposal for land division or property line adjustment as provided in Subsection
19.402.13.
1. Calculation of Permitted Number of Dwelling Units
a.
The maximum number of dwelling units proposed for a residential
cluster development shall not exceed the number of dwelling units
otherwise permitted for the residential zoning district in which the
parcel is located. The number of units allowed on a parent lot may
be transferred to one or more newly created lots or parcels on the
site. The cumulative density for all lots or parcels shall not exceed
the density allowed for the parent lot.
b.
The number of permitted dwelling units on a site shall be calculated
in the following manner:
(1)
Measure the gross area of the proposed cluster development site
in acres and tenths of an acre.
(2)
From the gross area, subtract the area of public streets, other
publicly dedicated improvements, and common open space (whether or
not it is conveyed pursuant to Subsection 19.402.14.C.2.c), measured
in acres and tenths of an acre. The remainder shall be the net buildable
area.
(3)
Convert the net buildable area from acres to square feet, using
the equivalency of 43,560 sq ft = 1 acre.
(4)
Divide the net buildable area by the smallest minimum lot size
(in square feet) per unit for a dwelling unit permitted in the zoning
district. This figure shall be rounded to the nearest lower number
to establish the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in the
cluster development.
2. Development Standards
a.
All principal and accessory uses authorized in the underlying
zoning district(s) shall be allowed in the cluster development. In
addition, singlefamily attached dwellings, multifamily dwellings,
and townhouses may be permitted for a cluster development located
in a residential zoning district that does not otherwise allow attached
dwelling units.
b.
Maximum lot coverage, building height, and off-street parking
requirements for the applicable zoning district shall apply to the
cluster development. Maximum lot coverage, floor area ratios, and
off-street parking requirements shall be applied to the entire site
rather than to any individual lot.
c.
The following provisions shall apply to any residential cluster
development, regardless of the general requirements of the applicable
residential zoning district:
(1)
The adjustments allowed by Subsection 19.402.14.A shall be available
for cluster development proposals.
(2)
Minimum lot width and lot depth standards shall not apply.
(3)
A minimum separation of 10 ft shall be provided between all
principal buildings and structures.
(4)
A minimum yard or common open space shall be provided, with
a minimum depth of 25 ft, as measured from all public streets and
from the side and rear lot lines of the entire cluster development.
(5)
Each lot shall provide at least 12 ft of frontage on a public
street.
(6)
More than 1 principal building or structure may be placed on
a lot.
(7)
No less than 25% of the site shall be conveyed as common open
space.
(8)
No less than 50% of the designated natural resources on the
site shall be included in calculating the common open space.
3. Site Plan Requirements
The preliminary and final site plans for a residential cluster
development shall include the following information, in addition to
the items listed on the City's Site Plan Requirements:
a.
The maximum number and type of dwelling units proposed.
b.
The areas of the site on which the dwelling units are to be
constructed or are currently located and their size. This may take
the form of the footprint of the dwelling unit or a building envelope
showing the general area in which the dwelling unit is to be located.
c.
The calculations for the permitted number of dwelling units,
derived pursuant to Subsection 19.402.14.C.1.
d.
The areas of the site on which other principal and accessory
uses are proposed to be located and their size.
e.
The areas of the site designated for common open space and their
size.
4. Approval Criteria
a.
Proposals for residential cluster development shall demonstrate
compliance with the following criteria:
(1)
The site plan satisfies the requirements of Subsections 19.402.14.C.1
and 2.
(2)
Buildings and structures are adequately grouped so that at least
25% of the total area of the site is set aside as common open space.
To the greatest degree practicable, common open space shall be designated
as a single tract and not divided into unconnected small parcels located
in various parts of the development. Common open space shall be conveyed
as allowed by Subsection 19.402.13.J.
(3)
Individual lots, buildings, structures, streets, and parking
areas are situated to minimize the alteration of natural features,
natural vegetation, and topography.
(4)
Impacts to WQRs and HCAs are avoided or minimized to the greatest
degree practicable.
(5)
The cluster development advances the purposes established in Subsection
19.402.1.
b.
The Planning Commission may apply such conditions or stipulations
to its approval as may be required to maintain harmony with neighboring
uses and promote the objectives and purposes of the Comprehensive
Plan and the Zoning and Land Division Ordinances.
c.
If the Planning Commission finds that the criteria in Subsection
19.402.14.C.4.a are met, it shall approve the residential cluster
Development, subject to any conditions established pursuant to Subsection
19.402.14.C.4.b.
The NR Administrative Map shows the locations of WQRs and HCAs.
For WQRs, the NR Administrative Map is a general indicator of protected
water features and their associated vegetated corridors; the location
of actual WQRs is determined according to the parameters established
in Table 19.402.15. With respect to HCA locations, the NR Administrative
Map is assumed to be correct unless demonstrated otherwise.
Table 19.402.15
Determination of WQR Location
|
---|
Protected Water Feature Type
|
Slope Adjacent to Protected Water Feature
|
Starting Point for measurements from Protected Water Feature
|
Width of Vegetated Corridor1
|
---|
Primary Protected Water Features2
|
< 25%
|
• Bankful stage (top of bank) or 2-year recurrence interval
flood elevation
• Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland
|
50′
|
Primary Protected Water Features2
|
≥ 25% for 150' or more3
|
• Bankful stage or 2-year flood elevation
• Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland
|
200′
|
Primary Protected Water Features2
|
≥ 25% for less than 150'3
|
• Bankful stage or 2-year flood elevation
• Delineated edge of Title 3 wetland
|
Distance from starting point of measurement to top of ravine
(break in ≥ 25% slope)4 plus 50′5
|
Secondary Protected Water Features6
|
< 25%
|
• Bankful stage or 2-year flood elevation
|
15′
|
Secondary Protected Water Features6
|
≥ 25%3
|
• Bankful stage or 2-year flood elevation
|
50′
|
1
|
Vegetated corridor width shall be applied to the outer boundaries
of water features, such as the edge of a wetland and both banks of
a watercourse.
|
2
|
Primary protected water features include: all perennial streams, streams draining 100 or more acres, Title 3 wetlands, and natural lakes and springs. See Section 19.201 for the full definition.
|
3
|
Vegetated corridors in excess of 50 ft for primary protected
features, or in excess of 15 ft for secondary protected features,
apply on steep slopes only in the uphill direction from the protected
water feature.
|
4
|
Where the protected water feature is confined by a ravine or
gully, the top of ravine is the break in the 25% slope.
|
5
|
A maximum reduction of 25 ft may be permitted in the width of
the vegetated corridor beyond the slope break if a geotechnical report
demonstrates that the slope is stable. To establish the width of the
vegetated corridor, slope should be measured in 25-ft increments away
from the water feature until the slope is less than 25% (top of ravine).
|
6
|
Secondary protected water features include intermittent streams draining 50 to 100 acres. See Section 19.201 for the full definition.
|
A. Boundary Verification
To determine whether the standards of Section
19.402 apply to a proposed activity at any given location, the boundaries of any designated natural resource(s) on or near the site shall be verified.
Agreement with the accuracy of the NR Administrative Map does
not constitute or require a land use decision. However, for activities
proposed within 100 ft of a wetland or its associated vegetated corridor,
the boundary verification process outlined in Subsection 19.402.15.A.2.a(1)(b)
shall be followed to identify the specific location of wetlands on
the subject property. The Planning Director may waive the requirement
for official wetland delineation, depending on the specific circumstances
of the site and the proposed activity. Such circumstances may include,
but are not limited to, the scale and potential impacts of the proposed
activity, the proximity of the proposed activity to the mapped resource,
and the Director's confidence in the accuracy of the NR Administrative
Map relative to the resource in question.
An applicant may challenge the accuracy of the NR Administrative
Map through either of the boundary verification processes outlined
in Subsections 19.402.15.A.1 and 2.
1. Type I Boundary Verification
The following minor corrections to mapped HCAs may be proposed according to one of the following procedures, and are subject to Type I review per Section
19.1004:
a.
Simple Incongruities
In some cases, the vegetative cover data shown on the NR Administrative
Map might not align with the location of existing legally established
Development or tree cover. An applicant who believes that the NR Administrative
Map is inaccurate, based on such an obvious misalignment, shall submit
the following information regarding the property:
(1)
A detailed property description and site plan of the property
that includes all existing conditions plans listed on the City's Site
Plan Requirements.
(2)
A copy of the applicable NR Administrative Map section.
(3)
The latest available aerial photograph of the property, with
lot lines shown, at a scale of at least 1 map inch equal to 50 ft
for lots of 20,000 or fewer square feet, and a scale of 1 map inch
equal to 100 ft for larger lots.
(4)
A documented demonstration of the misalignment between the NR
Administrative Map and the property's tax lot boundary lines and/or
the location of existing legally established development.
(5)
Any other factual information that the applicant wishes to provide
to support boundary verification.
b.
Legal Development Prior to Adoption Date
If a property was legally developed between the summer of 2002
(when the aerial photograph used to determine the regional habitat
inventory was taken) and September 15, 2011, the effective date of
Ordinance #2036, the applicant shall submit the following information
regarding the property:
(1)
The information described in Subsection 19.402.15.A.1.a.
(2)
A summer 2002 aerial photograph of the property, with lot lines
shown, at a scale of at least 1 map inch equal to 50 ft for lots of
20,000 or fewer square feet, and a scale of 1 map inch equal to 100
ft for larger lots.
(3)
Any approved building permits or other development plans and
drawings related to the development of the property that took place
between summer 2002 and September 15, 2011, the effective date of
Ordinance #2036.
(4)
A clear explanation and documentation, such as supporting maps
or drawings or a more recent aerial photograph, indicating the new
development that has occurred and where previously identified habitat
no longer exists because it is now part of a developed area.
2. Type II Boundary Verification
Corrections to mapped WQRs and/or detailed verification of mapped HCAs may be proposed according to the following procedures, and are subject to Type II review per Section
19.1005.
a.
Corrections to WQRs
(1)
Submittal Requirements
To propose a correction to a WQR shown on the NR Administrative
Map, the applicant shall submit the following information, depending
on the type of water feature in question:
(a) Drainages
In the case of drainages; including rivers, streams, springs,
and natural lakes; the applicant shall submit a report, prepared by
a qualified scientist or professional engineer who specializes in
hydrology, demonstrating whether or not the drainage meets the definition
of a protected water feature. If the drainage is demonstrated to be
a protected water feature, the applicant shall provide a topographic
map of the site, with contour intervals of 5 ft or less, that shows
the specific location of the drainage on the subject property.
(b) Wetlands
In the case of wetlands, the applicant shall submit a wetland
delineation report, prepared by a professional wetland specialist
in accordance with the 1996 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology
and following the wetlands delineation process established by DSL,
demonstrating the location of any wetlands on the site. The delineation
report will be accepted only after approval by DSL. If the wetland
is demonstrated to be a primary protected water feature, the applicant
shall provide a topographic map of the site, with contour intervals
of 5 ft or less, that shows the specific location of the wetland on
the subject property.
The Planning Director shall confer with DSL and Metro to confirm
delineation and hydrology reports, as may be needed, prior to issuing
a notice of decision on a requested map correction.
|
(2)
Approval Criteria
The City shall update the NR Administrative Map if the wetland
or hydrology report submitted demonstrates any of the following:
(a) That there was an error in the original mapping.
(b) That the boundaries of the WQR have changed since
the most recent update to the NR Administrative Map.
(c) That a primary protected water feature no longer
exists because the area has been legally filled, culverted, or developed
prior to January 16, 2003, the effective date of Ordinance #1912.
b.
Detailed Verification of HCAs
An applicant who believes that an HCA shown on the NR Administrative
Map should be corrected for a reason other than those described in
Subsections 19.402.15.A.1.a or b may propose a detailed verification.
(1)
Submittal Requirements
The applicant shall submit a report prepared and signed by either
a knowledgeable and qualified natural resource professional; such
as a wildlife biologist, botanist, or hydrologist; or a civil or environmental
engineer registered in Oregon to design public sanitary or storm systems,
stormwater facilities, or other similar facilities. The report shall
include:
(a) A description of the qualifications and experience
of all persons that contributed to the report and, for each person
that contributed, a description of the elements of the analysis to
which the person contributed.
(b) The information described in Subsection 19.402.15.A.1.a.
(c) The information described in Subsection 19.402.15.A.1.b,
if the applicant believes such information is relevant to the verification
of habitat location on the subject lot or parcel.
(d) Additional aerial photographs, if the applicant
believes they provide better information regarding the property, including
documentation of the date and process used to take the photos and
an expert's interpretation of the additional information they provide.
(e) A map showing the topography of the property shown
by 2-ft vertical contours in areas of slopes less than 15%, and at
5-ft vertical contours of slopes 15% or greater.
(f) Any additional information necessary to address
each of the detailed verification criteria provided in Subsection
19.402.15.A.2.b(2); a description of where any HCAs are located on
the property, based on the application of the detailed verification
criteria; and factual documentation to support the analysis.
(2)
Approval Criteria
A boundary verification request submitted under Subsection 19.402.15.A.2.b
shall be evaluated according to the following three-step process:
(a) Verify Boundaries of Inventoried Riparian Habitat
Locating habitat and determining the riparian habitat class
of the designated natural resource is a four-step process:
(i) Locate the water feature that is the basis for
identifying riparian habitat.
•
|
Locate the top of bank of all streams, rivers, and open water
within 200 ft of the property.
|
•
|
Locate all flood areas within 100 ft of the property.
|
•
|
Locate all wetlands within 150 ft of the property, based on
the NR Administrative Map. Identified wetlands shall be further delineated
consistent with methods currently accepted by DSL and the Corps.
|
(ii) Identify the vegetative cover status of all areas
on the property that are within 200 ft of the top of bank of streams,
rivers, and open water; are wetlands or are within 150 ft of wetlands;
and are flood areas and within 100 ft of flood areas.
•
|
Vegetative cover status shall be as identified on the latest
Metro Vegetative Cover Map (available from the City and/or the Metro
Data Resource Center).
|
•
|
The vegetative cover status of a property may be adjusted only
if: (1) the property was legally developed prior to September 15,
2011, the effective date of Ordinance #2036 (see Subsection 19.402.15.A.1.b);
or (2) an error was made at the time the vegetative cover status was
determined. To assert the latter type of error, applicants shall submit
an analysis of the vegetative cover on their property, using the aerial
photographs on which the latest Metro Vegetative Cover Map is based
and the definitions of the different vegetative cover types identified
in Table 19.402.15.A.2.b(2)(a)(iv).
|
(iii) Determine whether the degree that the land slopes
upward from all streams, rivers, and open water within 200 ft of the
property is greater than or less than 25%, using the methodology outlined
in Table 19.402.15.
(iv) Identify the riparian habitat classes applicable
to all areas on the property using Table 19.402.15.A.2.b(2)(a)(iv)
and the data identified in Subsections 19.402.15.A.2.b(2)(a)(i) through
(iii).
Table 19.402.15.A.2.b(2)(a)(iv)
Method for Determining Classification of Riparian Areas
|
---|
Distance from Protected Water Feature
|
Development/Vegetation Status1
|
---|
Low Structure Vegetation or Open Soils2
|
Woody Vegetation
(shrub and scattered forest canopy)3
|
Forest Canopy
(closed to open forest canopy)4
|
---|
Surface Streams
|
0'-50'
|
Class I5
|
Class I
|
Class I
|
51'-100'
|
Class II6
|
Class I
|
Class I
|
101'-150'
|
Class II6 if slope>25%
|
Class II6 if slope>25%
|
Class II6
|
151'-200'
|
Class II6 if slope>25%
|
Class II6 if slope>25%
|
Class II6 if slope>25%
|
Wetlands (wetland feature itself is a Class I riparian
area)
|
0'-100'
|
Class II6
|
Class I
|
Class I
|
101'-150'
|
|
|
Class II5
|
Flood Areas
|
Within 300' of river or surface stream
|
Class I
|
Class I
|
Class I
|
More than 300' from river or surface stream
|
Class II6
|
Class II6
|
Class I
|
0'-100' from edge of flood area
|
|
Class II6, 7
|
Class II6
|
1
|
The vegetative cover type assigned to any particular area was
based on two factors: the type of vegetation observed in aerial photographs
and the size of the overall contiguous area of vegetative cover to
which a particular piece of vegetation belonged.
|
2
|
"Low structure vegetation or open soils" means areas that are
part of a contiguous area 1 acre or larger of grass, meadow, croplands,
or areas of open soils located within 300 ft of a surface stream.
Low structure vegetation areas may include areas of shrub vegetation
less than 1 acre in size; if they are contiguous with areas of grass,
meadow, croplands, orchards, Christmas tree farms, holly farms, or
areas of open soils located within 300 ft of a surface stream; and
if those contiguous areas together form an area of 1 acre in size
or larger.
|
3
|
"Woody vegetation" means areas that are part of a contiguous
area 1 acre or larger of shrub or open or scattered forest canopy
(less than 60% crown closure) located within 300 ft of a surface stream.
|
4
|
"Forest canopy" means areas that are part of a contiguous grove
of trees of 1 acre or larger in area with approximately 60% or greater
crown closure, irrespective of whether the entire grove is within
200 ft of the relevant water feature.
|
5
|
Except that areas within 50 ft of surface streams shall be Class
II riparian areas if their vegetation status is "low structure vegetation
or open soils," and they are high gradient streams. High gradient
streams are identified on the Metro Vegetative Cover Map. If a property
owner believes the gradient of a stream was incorrectly identified,
then the property owner may demonstrate the correct classification
by identifying the channel type using the methodology described in
the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual, published
by OWEB, and appended to Metro's Riparian Corridor and Wildlife
Habitat Inventories Report, Attachment 1 to Exhibit F to
Metro Ordinance No. 05-1077C.
|
6
|
Areas that have been identified as habitats of concern, as designated
on the Metro Habitats of Concern Map (on file in the Metro Council
office), shall be treated as Class I riparian habitat areas in all
cases; subject to the provision of additional information that establishes
that they do not meet the criteria used to identify habitats of concern
as described in Metro's Technical Report for Fish and Wildlife. Examples of habitats of concern include: Oregon white oak woodlands,
bottomland hardwood forests, wetlands, native grasslands, riverine
islands or deltas, and important wildlife migration corridors.
|
7
|
Only if within 300 ft of a river or surface stream.
|
(b) Determine the Property's Urban Development Value
The urban development value of property designated as regionally
significant habitat is depicted on the Metro Habitat Urban Development
Value Map (available from the Metro Data Resource Center).
(i) A property's urban development value designation
shall be adjusted upward if the Metro 2040 Design Type designation
for the property lot or parcel has changed from one with a lower urban
development value to one with a higher urban development value. 2040
Design Type designations are identified on the Metro 2040 Applied
Concept Map (available from the Metro Data Resource Center).
(ii) Properties in areas designated on the 2040 Applied
Concept Map as Central City, Regional Centers, Town Centers, and Regionally
Significant Industrial Areas are considered to be of high urban development
value; properties in areas designated as Main Streets, Station Communities,
Other Industrial Areas, and Employment Centers are of medium urban
development value; and properties in areas designated as Inner and
Outer Neighborhoods and Corridors are of low urban development value.
(iii) As designated in Title 13 of the UGMFP, properties
owned by a regionally significant educational or medical facility
are designated as high urban development value.
(c) Cross-Reference Habitat Class with Urban Development
Value
City verification of the locations of HCAs shall be consistent
with Table 19.402.15.A.2.b(2)(c).
Table 19.402.15.A.2.b(2)(c)
Method for Identifying Habitat Conservation Areas (HCAs)
|
---|
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Classification
|
High Urban Development Value1
|
Medium Urban Development Value2
|
Low Urban Development Value3
|
Other Areas: Parks and Open Spaces (no design types outside
UGB)
|
---|
Class I Riparian
|
HCA
|
HCA
|
HCA
|
HCA
|
Class II Riparian
|
HCA
|
HCA
|
HCA
|
HCA
|
Class A Upland Wildlife
|
No HCA
|
No HCA
|
No HCA
|
No HCA/HCA4
|
Class B Upland Wildlife
|
No HCA
|
No HCA
|
No HCA
|
No HCA/HCA4
|
NOTE: The default urban development value of property is as
depicted on the Metro Habitat Urban Development Value Map. The Metro
2040 Design Type designations provided in the following footnotes
are only for use when a city or county is determining whether to make
an HCA adjustment.
|
1
|
Primary 2040 design type: Central City, Regional Centers, Town
Centers, and Regionally Significant Industrial Areas.
|
2
|
Secondary 2040 design type: Main Streets, Station Communities,
Other Industrial areas, and Employment Centers.
|
3
|
Tertiary 2040 design type: Inner and Outer Neighborhoods, Corridors.
|
4
|
All Class A and B upland wildlife habitat in publicly-owned
parks and open spaces shall be considered HCA, except for parks and
open spaces where the acquiring agency clearly identified that it
was acquiring the property to develop it for active recreational uses.
|
(3)
Notification to Metro and DLCD
When an application for boundary verification proposes corrections
to mapped HCAs that would result in a change in HCA designation of
1 acre or more, the City shall notify Metro and the Oregon Department
of Land Conservation and Development within 7 days after the application
has been deemed complete, in accordance with the Type II referral
procedure outlined in Subsection 19.1005.3.A.
3. Type III or V Boundary Verification
Corrections to mapped WQRs or HCAs that are not subject to processing according to the provisions outlined in either of Subsection 19.402.15.A.1 or A.2, such as in cases where the City initiates the change without property owner authorization and/or where the changes involve more properties than for which it is practicable to obtain all property owners' authorization, shall be processed in accordance with the procedures for zoning map amendments as provided in Subsection
19.902.6. Such corrections shall be processed with either Type III or Type V review, accordingly, but do not constitute amendments to the zoning map itself, only to the NR Administrative Map.
B. Map Administration
1. Updates to the NR Administrative Map
When a boundary verification, conducted in accordance with the
standards of Subsection 19.402.15.A, demonstrates an error in the
location of a WQR or HCA shown on the NR Administrative Map, the City
shall update the NR Administrative Map to incorporate the corrected
information as soon as practicable. Changes to the NR Administrative
Map are not considered amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan,
to Comprehensive Plan Map 5 (Natural Resources), or to the Zoning
Map.
2. Mapping Implications of Allowed Disturbances
a.
WQRs
Permanent disturbances within a WQR, whether they occurred prior to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance or are allowed according to the standards of Section
19.402, do not affect the way related WQRs are shown on the NR Administrative Map.
b.
HCAs
When disturbances are allowed within HCAs, in accordance with the applicable standards of Section
19.402, the City may update the NR Administrative Map to show that the permanently disturbed area is no longer considered an HCA.
3. Designation of Annexed Areas
When land annexed to the City includes WQRs and/or HCAs, as
designated by Clackamas County, those same designations shall be shown
on the City's NR Administrative Map at the time of annexation. Verification
of the boundaries of such WQRs and/or HCAs shall be processed in accordance
with the applicable provisions established in Subsection 19.402.15.A;
not necessarily at the time of annexation, but at such time as a new
activity is proposed on the annexed property.
(Ord. 2025 § 2, 2011; Ord. 2112 § 2 (Exh. B), 2015; Ord. 2218 § 2 (Exh. B), 2022)
The intent and purpose of this section is to promote the general
welfare by providing for the identification, protection, enhancement,
perpetuation, and use of sites, structures, districts, objects, and
buildings within the City that reflect the City's unique architectural,
archaeological, and historical heritage, and to facilitate preservation
of such properties in order to:
A. Safeguard the City's heritage as embodied and reflected in such resources;
B. Encourage public knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of the
City's history and culture;
C. Foster community and neighborhood pride and sense of identity based
on recognition and use of cultural resources;
D. Promote the enjoyment and use of cultural resources appropriate for
the education and recreation of the people of the City;
E. Preserve diverse and significant architectural styles reflecting
phases of the City's history, and encourage complementary design and
construction relative to cultural resources;
F. Enhance property value and increase economic and financial benefits
to the City and its residents;
G. Identify and resolve conflicts between the preservation of cultural
resources and alternative land uses;
H. Integrate the management of cultural resources and relevant data
into public and private land management and development processes;
and
I. Implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
"Commission"
means the City of Milwaukie Planning Commission.
"Contributing"
means an historic resource ranking whereby buildings, sites,
structures, or objects are less significant examples of architecture
or of lesser historical association. These, over time, may become
a source for additional "significant" resources. To be designated
as "contributing," an historic resource must receive a rating score
level of 50 to 60% on the evaluation worksheet or score a high of
10 in at least one of the categories of the evaluation worksheet.
"Demolish"
means to raze, destroy, dismantle, deface, or in any other
manner cause partial or total destruction of a designated resource
or building in an historic district.
"Evaluation worksheet"
means a rating system used by the City to rank historic resources
as to their historic, architectural, or environmental characteristics.
The ranking system is numerical with a top score of 86 and is part
of the historic and cultural resources inventory, located in the background
paper.
"Landmark"
means a cultural resource that has been designated by the City Council as per Subsection
19.403.4 of this section.
"Significant"
means an historic resource ranking whereby important buildings,
sites, structures, or objects in Milwaukie are distinguished by outstanding
qualities of architecture, relationship to environment, and/or historic
associations. To be designated as "significant," an historic resource
must receive a rating score level of 60% or greater on the evaluation
worksheet and be at least 50 years old, or score a high of 10 in at
least two of the categories of the evaluation worksheet, or be listed
on the National Register of Historic Places.
"Unrankable"
means historic resources that lack sufficient information
to be ranked. When that information is available, those found to be
"significant" or "contributing" shall be recommended by the Planning
Commission for designation as "landmarks."
Nothing in this title shall be construed to prevent the ordinary
maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature which
does not involve a change in design, material, or appearance of such
feature, or which the building official shall certify is required
for Public safety due to an unsafe or dangerous condition.
(Ord. 2110 § 2 (Exh. G),
2015)
The Flex Space Overlay Zone implements the Central Milwaukie
Land Use and Transportation Plan and is intended to provide flexibility
for development of an identified opportunity site within central Milwaukie
(Figure 19.404). This overlay provides targeted opportunities for
employment uses and promotes buildings that can accommodate a variety
of uses that may change over time. Uses in the Flex Space Overlay
Zone may include employment-intensive uses beyond those allowed in
the underlying GMU Zone and may change as appropriate to respond to
market conditions and developer needs.
The standards and requirements of this section apply to all
properties within the Flex Space Overlay Zone as indicated on the
Zoning Map.
The General Mixed Use Zone GMU is the base zone for properties
within the Flex Space Overlay Zone, and all requirements of the base
zone apply unless otherwise noted in this section. Where conflicts
occur between this section and other sections of the Milwaukie Municipal
Code, the standards and requirements of this section shall supersede.
In addition to those uses allowed by the base zone (GMU), Table
19.404.4 lists uses that are permitted within the Flex Space Overlay
Zone.
Table 19.404.4
Flex Space Overlay Zone Uses
|
---|
Use Category
|
Status
|
---|
A. Industrial Services
|
Industrial services are engaged in repair and/or servicing of
industrial, business, or consumer machinery, equipment, products or
by-products; or in training or instruction of such repair or servicing.
Examples include electrical contractors, equipment rental facilities,
tool or instrument repair, and data storage facilities.
|
P
|
B. Manufacturing1
|
Manufacturing comprises establishments engaged in the mechanical,
physical, or chemical transformation of materials, substances, or
components into new products, including the assembly of component
parts.
Examples include alternative energy development; biosciences;
food and beverage processing; software and electronics production;
printing; fabrication of metal products; products made from manufactured
glass; products made from rubber, plastic, or resin; converted paper
and cardboard products; and microchip fabrication. Manufacturing may
also include high-tech and research and development companies.
|
P
|
C. Trade Schools2
|
Trade schools are establishments whose primary purpose is to
provide training for industrial needs and job-specific certification.
Examples include electronic equipment repair training, welding
school, training for repair of industrial machinery, and other industrial
skills training.
|
P
|
D. Accessory Uses
|
Uses accessory to, and in conjunction with, uses permitted outright
may include the following:
Warehousing and distribution associated with a permitted manufacturing
or industrial use. Products stored at, and distributed from, the warehouse
shall be those assembled or manufactured at the facility permitted
in the overlay zone. The accessory warehouse may be located within
the associated manufacturing or industrial building or in a separate
building and shall occupy up to a maximum of 40% of the floor area
of the associated manufacturing or industrial building.
|
P
|
P =
|
Permitted
|
1.
|
Manufacturing uses shall only be conducted in an enclosed space.
The following manufacturing uses are not allowed: explosive materials,
concrete and asphalt mixing or batching, rock crushing, and aggregate
storage.
|
2.
|
All activities related to trade schools must be conducted inside
an enclosed building.
|
All uses listed in Table 19.404.4 above require a Type II development review approval, pursuant to Section
19.906.
The development standards of Subsection
19.303.4 apply in the Flex Space Overlay Zone, except as noted below, for any of the uses permitted in Table 19.404.4.
A. The minimum floor area ratio is 0.3:1
B. There is no minimum street frontage requirement.
C. The building height bonus in Subsection 19.303.4.B is available.
D. The frontage occupancy requirement in Subsection 19.303.4.D only
applies along 32nd Ave.
E. The maximum front yard setback is 50 ft. The setback area must be
landscaped, except where used for parking as allowed in 19.404.6.F.
F. Parking may be located within the front yard setback, except when
adjacent to 32nd Ave.
G. All new buildings shall have at least 1 primary entrance facing the
front of the property or, where a property does not front on a public
street, the entrance shall face the primary access drive that serves
the building.
H. Flex Space Overlay Zone properties that abut a residential zone shall
provide an 8-ft-wide landscaped buffer along the residential property
line.
I. Pedestrian and bicycle accessways into and through the site shall
be separated from vehicle accessways by curbed landscaping, and/or
planters, and/or similar physical separation.
The design standards in Subsection
19.505.7 Nonresidential Development apply to all new mixed-use and nonresidential development in the Flex Space Overlay Zone. The design standards apply in all locations, even those where the development is not adjacent to a public street.
In order to ensure compatibility between manufacturing and nonmanufacturing
uses, the following off-site impact standards apply:
A. Applicability
The off-site impact standards in this subsection apply to all
new machinery, equipment, and facilities associated with manufacturing
uses. Machinery, equipment, or facilities that were at the site and
in compliance with existing regulations as of February 13, 2016, the
effective date of Ordinance 2110, are not subject to these offsite
impact standards.
B. Noise
The City's noise control standards and requirements in Chapter
8.08 apply.
C. Vibration
Continuous, frequent, or repetitive vibrations that exceed 0.002g
peak are prohibited. Generally, this means that a person of normal
sensitivities should not be able to feel any vibrations.
1. Temporary vibrations from construction activities or vehicles leaving
the site are exempt.
2. Vibrations lasting less than 5 minutes per day are exempt.
3. Seismic or electronic measuring equipment may be used when there
are doubts about the level of vibrations.
D. Odor
Continuous, frequent, or repetitive odors are prohibited. The
odor threshold is the point at which an odor may just be detected.
An odor detected for less than 15 minutes per day is exempt.
E. Illumination
Machinery, equipment, and facilities may not directly or indirectly
cause illumination on other properties in excess of 0.5 footcandles
of light.
F. Measurements
Measurements for compliance with these standards may be made
from the property line or within the property of the affected site.
Measurements may be made at ground level or at habitable levels of
buildings.
G. Documentation
An applicant must provide documentation certified by a registered
engineer or architect, as appropriate, to ensure that the proposed
activity can achieve compliance with these standards.
(Ord. 2025 § 2, 2011; Ord. 2112 § 2 (Exh. B), 2015)
The purpose of the L-F Zone is to minimize hazards related to
aircraft landing facilities. Special height limitations or other restrictions
in addition to those already embodied in this chapter may be necessary
in order to prevent the establishment of obstructions to the air space
required by aircraft in landing and taking off from airports, helicopter
pads or other landing fields. Furthermore, establishment of any new
aircraft landing facility should be undertaken only after an evaluation
has been made of its effects on the safety, welfare, and property
values of owners or occupants of nearby property. The L-F Zone is
a superimposed zone applied in combination with existing regular zones.
In an L-F Zone an airport, helicopter, or other aircraft landing
facility and a use or conditional use permitted in accordance with
the provisions of the preestablished regular zone shall be permitted
only as provided below:
A. The height of any structure or part of structure, such as chimney,
tower, antenna, etc., shall be limited according to requirements established
by the Planning Commission or by other appropriate authorities.
B. In approach zones to airports or other aircraft landing facilities,
as designated by the Planning Commission or other appropriate authorities,
no meeting place which is designed to accommodate more than 25 persons
at one time shall be permitted.
C. The size of the property upon which the airport or landing facility
is proposed shall be sufficient to permit the safe operation of aircraft,
to allow adequate space for all associated facilities, and to protect
adjacent property from the impact of aircraft operation and associated
activity.
D. Prior to a decision on the establishment of an L-F Zone, the Planning
Commission shall request a report and recommendation from the Oregon
State Board of Aeronautics as to the suitability of the particular
property for airport purposes and as to other conditions which might
be necessary to safeguard the safety and general welfare of the public.
The following procedures shall govern the application of L-F
Zones:
A. An L-F Zone may be established, altered, or abolished subject to the provisions of Section
19.902.
B. An L-F Zone may be established in combination with other regular
zones. An area approved as an L-F Zone shall be identified on the
Zoning Map or map amendments with the letters "L-F" in addition to
the abbreviated designation of the existing zoning.