Design review is as required by Chapter 22.68, Architectural Board of Review.
(Ord. 6006, 2021)
A. 
Purpose. The recognition and preservation of structures, sites, and natural features having historic, architectural, archaeological, or cultural significance is in the interest of the health, economic prosperity, and general welfare of the community. This chapter implements the City Charter and Historic Resources Element of the General Plan by protecting and preserving historic resources and implements the powers and duties of the Historic Landmarks Commission. The specific purposes of this chapter are the following:
1. 
To safeguard the City's heritage by protecting historic resources representing significant elements of its history;
2. 
To protect and enhance the City's visual character by encouraging and regulating architectural styles within Landmark and Historic Districts, that reflect the City's unique and established architectural, cultural and landscaping traditions;
3. 
To foster public appreciation of, and civic pride in, the beauty of the City and the accomplishments of its cultural past;
4. 
To strengthen the economy and vitality of the City by protecting and enhancing the City's attractions to residents and visitors;
5. 
To promote the private and public use of Landmarks, Structures of Merit, and Historic Districts for the education, prosperity, and general welfare of the people;
6. 
To stabilize and improve property values within the City;
7. 
To undertake the identification, inventory, and consideration of structures, sites, and features that may merit designation as a historic resource;
8. 
To promote high standards in architectural and landscape design and the construction of aesthetically pleasing structures;
9. 
To promote neighborhood compatibility; and
10. 
To ensure that the review process is fair and consistent both in policy and implementation, and to allow all who are involved to participate in the process.
B. 
Applicability.
1. 
Exterior Alterations, Relocation and Demolition. Approval by the Historic Landmarks Commission is required for any exterior alteration, relocation, or demolition, including demolition by neglect of a structure, site, or feature developed with, containing, or located within any of the following:
a. 
City-Owned or Leased Property. If the alteration, construction or relocation of any structure, natural feature, site or area owned or leased by the City has a historic resource on the lot, the entire property is under Historic Landmarks Commission jurisdiction, except for the Airport Property due to the size of the property and demand for air use and the Historic Landmarks Commission purview will be over historic resources on the site only.
b. 
El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District. As defined in Section 30.57.030.
c. 
Historic Resource. A historic resource as defined in Section 30.300.080 "H" Historic Resources Related Definitions.
d. 
Historic District (HD) Overlay Zones. All properties, contributing and non-contributing, within a HD Overlay Zone.
e. 
Publicly Owned Buildings Generally. Except as provided in subsections B.1.f. and g below, any structure, natural feature, site or area owned or leased by any public entity other than the City of Santa Barbara and designated as a Landmark or Structure of Merit, or located within any landmark district, shall not be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
f. 
Public Interest Exception for City Facilities. The City Council shall first make a public interest determination on whether the alteration, construction or relocation of any structure, natural feature, site or area owned or leased by the City and designated as a Landmark or Structure of Merit, or located within any Landmark or Historic District, is exempt from review by the Historic Landmarks Commission.
g. 
Highway 101 Santa Barbara Coastal Parkway Special Design District. A natural feature, site or area owned or leased by a public entity within the Highway 101 Santa Barbara Coastal Parkway Special Design District as defined by Section 22.68.060.C, which requires a Coastal Development Permit and which is designated as a Landmark, Structure of Merit, or which is located within any Landmark or Historic District shall be reviewed by the Historic Landmarks Commission.
2. 
Minor Zoning Exceptions and Other Approvals. In addition to any review required pursuant to this chapter, the Historic Landmarks Commission shall review all applications for Minor Zoning Exceptions.
3. 
Exception for Certain Trees. Notwithstanding the above, the placement, alteration, or removal of trees shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 15.20 or 15.24, as applicable.
C. 
Review Authority. The Review Authority shall approve, conditionally approve, revise or deny all applications for design review based on consideration of the requirements of this chapter.
1. 
Historic Landmarks Commission. The Historic Landmarks Commission shall review all applications as required by this Chapter, including minor alterations on Landmarks and in El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District, and alterations contributing to a historic resources in a historic district overlay zone and properties listed on the Historic Resources Inventory.
2. 
City Architectural Historian (as defined under Qualified Professional Staff in Historic Preservation). Shall review ordinary maintenance contributing to historic resources in a historic district overlay zone and properties listed on the Historic Resources Inventory (as defined in Section 30.300.080 "H"). Ordinary maintenance done to a Historic Resource may be approved through the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness as a ministerial action by the City's Architectural Historian without review by the Historic Landmarks Commission.
a. 
Referrals to Historic Landmarks Commission. The City's Architectural Historian may refer any proposed ordinary maintenance to the Historic Landmarks Commission if the City's Architectural Historian finds that the maintenance has the potential to have an adverse effect on the integrity of the historic resource because it does not meet the Secretary of the Interior Standards.
b. 
Administrative Review. The issuance of the Certificate of Appropriateness by the City's Architectural Historian is a ministerial action and does not require a noticed public hearing, and is otherwise final and not appealable.
D. 
Referrals to Planning Commission.
1. 
Planning Commission Comments. When the Historic Landmarks Commission determines that a development is proposed for a site which is highly visible to the general public, the Historic Landmarks Commission may, prior to granting project design approval of the application, require presentation of the application to the Planning Commission solely for the purpose of obtaining comments from the Planning Commission regarding the application. Planning Commission comments would be considered by the Historic Landmarks Commission in its deliberations.
2. 
Public Notice and Hearing. Prior to making any comments regarding an application pursuant to this section, the Planning Commission shall hold a noticed public hearing. Notice of the hearing shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 30.205, Common Procedures.
E. 
Public Notice and Hearing. Projects That Require Public Notice. Applications for the following projects shall require public notice and hearing pursuant to Chapter 30.205, Common Procedures:
1. 
New single residential units, two-unit residential units, multiple residential units, mixed-use buildings or nonresidential buildings located in El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District or a Historic District;
2. 
The addition of over 500 square feet of net floor area to a single-unit residential or two-unit residential unit;
3. 
An addition of a new second or higher story to an existing single-unit residential or two-unit residential housing type;
4. 
An addition of over 150 square feet of net floor area to an existing second or higher story of a single-unit residential or two-unit residential housing type;
5. 
The addition of over 500 square feet of net floor area or any change that will result in an additional residential unit to a multi-unit residential housing type;
6. 
Whenever approval of a Development Plan is required pursuant to Chapter 28.85 or 30.170 (Nonresidential Growth Management Program);
7. 
Projects involving more than 250 cubic yards of grading outside the footprint of any main building (soil located within five feet of an exterior wall of a main building that is excavated and re-compacted shall not be included in the calculation of the volume of grading outside the building footprint);
8. 
Projects involving exterior lighting with the apparent potential to create significant glare on neighboring parcels;
9. 
Projects involving the placement or removal of natural features with the apparent potential to significantly alter the exterior visual qualities of real property;
10. 
Projects involving an application for an exception to the parking requirements for a single residential unit as specified in Section 28.90.100.G.l.c. or Section 30.175.030.N.l.a.;
11. 
Projects involving an application for a Minor Zoning Exception as specified in Section 30.245.060; or
12. 
All proposals to designate a City Landmark or Structures of Merit.
F. 
Project Compatibility.
1. 
Project Compatibility Findings. In addition to any other considerations and requirements specified in this Code, the applicable findings identified below shall be considered by the Historic Landmarks Commission when it reviews and approves or disapproves the design of a proposed development project in a noticed public hearing pursuant to the requirements of Section 30.157.100.
a. 
Consistency with Design Guidelines. The design of the project is consistent with design guidelines applicable to the location of the project within the City;
b. 
Compatible with Architectural Character of City and Neighborhood. The design of the project is compatible with the desirable architectural qualities and characteristics which are distinctive of Santa Barbara and of the particular neighborhood surrounding the project;
c. 
Appropriate Size, Mass, Bulk, Height, and Scale. The size, mass, bulk, height, and scale of the project is appropriate for its location and its neighborhood;
d. 
Sensitivity to Adjacent Landmarks and Historic Resources. The design of the project is appropriately sensitive to adjacent Federal, State, or City Landmarks or other nearby designated historic resources, including City structures of merit, sites, or natural features;
e. 
Public Views of the Ocean and Mountains. The design of the project responds appropriately to established scenic public vistas; or
f. 
Use of Open Space and Landscaping. The project includes an appropriate amount of open space and landscaping.
2. 
Review Procedures.
a. 
Projects with Design Review Only. If a project only requires design review by the Historic Landmarks Commission pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and does not require discretionary land use approval, the Historic Landmarks Commission shall consider the applicable Project Compatibility Findings during the course of its review prior to granting an approval, denial or continuance of project design approval for the project.
b. 
Projects with Design Review and Other Discretionary Approvals. If, in addition to design review by the Historic Landmarks Commission, a project requires a discretionary land use approval (either from the Staff Hearing Officer, the Planning Commission, or the City Council), the Historic Landmarks Commission shall review and discuss the applicable Project Compatibility Findings during its conceptual review of the project and shall provide its comments on those findings as part of the minutes of the Historic Landmarks Commission hearing which would then be forwarded to the Staff Hearing Officer, the Planning Commission, or the City Council (as applicable).
G. 
Appeals. Appeals of any decision of the Historic Landmarks Commission to the City Council may be made in accordance with the requirements of Section 30.205.150, Appeals.
1. 
Limits on New Evidence. The City Council will decide the appeal in the exercise of its independent judgment based upon the record of the proceedings of the Historic Landmarks Commission. New evidence will not be considered unless the City Council determines that relevant evidence exists that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced or was improperly excluded at the hearing before the Historic Landmarks Commission.
(Ord. 6006, 2021)
Design review is as required by Chapter 22.70, Sign Regulations.
(Ord. 6006, 2021)
Design review is as required by Chapter 22.69, Single Family Design Board.
(Ord. 6006, 2021)