A. 
The planning director or designee is vested with the duty of administering the rules and regulations relating to the State Shoreline Management Act, Chapter 90.58 RCW (the "Act"), and the Mukilteo waterfront development and shoreline management regulations. The director shall prepare and require the use of such forms as are essential to the administration of this title.
B. 
This chapter includes the permit procedures for reviewing and issuing shoreline permits including shoreline substantial development permits, variances, conditional use permits, shoreline exemptions, and extensions to any of these permits or approvals.
C. 
All development must obtain a substantial development permit, unless the shoreline administrator determines that it qualifies for a shoreline exemption. Exempt development may still be subject to a conditional use permit or variance if the activity does not comply with the policies and regulations of the shoreline management plan or the State Shoreline Management Act.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A local SMP may consolidate all the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) exceptions to incorporate the Department of Ecology's recently revised rules with all applicable statutes as follows:
A. 
Developments not required to obtain shoreline permits or local reviews:
1. 
Requirements to obtain a substantial development permit, conditional use permit, variance, letter of exemption, or other review to implement the Shoreline Management Act do not apply to the following:
a. 
Remedial actions. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person conducting a remedial action at a facility pursuant to a consent decree, order, or agreed order issued pursuant to Chapter 70.105D RCW, or to the Department of Ecology when it conducts a remedial action under Chapter 70.105D RCW.
b. 
Boatyard improvements to meet NPDES permit requirements. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person installing site improvements for stormwater treatment in an existing boatyard facility to meet requirements of a national pollutant discharge elimination system stormwater general permit.
c. 
WSDOT facility maintenance and safety improvements. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.356, Washington State Department of Transportation projects and activities meeting the conditions of RCW 90.58.356 are not required to obtain a substantial development permit, conditional use permit, variance, letter of exemption, or other local review.
d. 
Projects consistent with an environmental excellence program agreement pursuant to RCW 90.58.045.
e. 
Projects authorized through the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council process, pursuant to Chapter 80.50 RCW.
f. 
Projects that only involve timber cutting as part of a forest practice, pursuant to RCW 76.09.240.
g. 
Areas and uses in those areas that are under exclusive federal jurisdiction as established through federal or state statutes are not subject to the jurisdiction of Chapter 90.58 RCW.
(Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
The actions listed in this section shall be exempt from the city's shoreline substantial development permit procedures. Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that meet the precise terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be granted exemption from the substantial development permit process.
B. 
An exemption from the substantial development permit process is not an exemption from compliance with the Act or the Mukilteo shoreline master program, or from any other regulatory requirements. To be authorized, all uses and developments must be consistent with the policies and provisions of the Mukilteo shoreline master program and the State Shoreline Management Act.
C. 
The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt from the permit process is on the applicant.
D. 
If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a substantial development permit is required for the entire proposed development project.
E. 
Project Conditions. The city may attach conditions to the approval of exempted developments and/or uses as necessary to ensure consistency of the project with the State Act and the Mukilteo shoreline master program.
F. 
Exemptions. The development activities listed in state law, WAC 173-27-040 through 173-27-045, including any revisions or updates, shall not require substantial development permits.
G. 
A request for exemption shall be accompanied by materials adequate for the administrator to determine that the development qualifies for the stated exemption, and determine that it conforms with the protection standards of the SMP.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
Some projects conducted on shorelines of the state also require review and approval by federal agencies. The Department of Ecology is designated as the coordinating agency for the state with regard to permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The city shall follow the following procedures with regard to exempt development and is subject to federal permit review:
A. 
The city shall prepare an exemption statement, addressed to the applicant and the Department of Ecology, whenever a development is determined by the city to be exempt from the substantial development permit requirements and the development is subject to one or more of the following federal permit requirements:
1. 
A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 10 permit under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. (The provisions of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act generally apply to any project occurring on or over navigable waters. Specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers.); or
2. 
A Section 404 permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972. (The provisions of Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act generally apply to any project which may involve discharge of dredge or fill material to any water or wetland area. Specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers.)
B. 
The statement shall indicate the specific exemption provision from WAC 173-27-040 that is being applied to the development and provide a summary of the city's analysis of the consistency of the project with the Mukilteo master program and the Shoreline Management Act. A copy of the exemption statement shall be placed in the official city record and a copy provided to the project proponent for their records.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
Any development exempted from obtaining a shoreline substantial development permit shall be consistent with the policies of the Mukilteo shoreline master program, shoreline management regulations, and the State Shoreline Management Act.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
The city may grant relief from shoreline master program development standards and use regulations within urban growth areas when the following apply:
A. 
A shoreline restoration project causes or would cause a landward shift in the ordinary high water mark, resulting in the following:
1. 
Land that had not been regulated under this chapter prior to construction of the restoration project is brought under shoreline jurisdiction; or
2. 
Additional regulatory requirements apply due to a landward shift in required shoreline buffers or other regulations of the applicable shoreline master program; and
a. 
Application of shoreline master program regulations would preclude or interfere with use of the property permitted by local development regulations, thus presenting a hardship to the project proponent;
B. 
The proposed relief meets the following criteria:
1. 
The proposed relief is the minimum necessary to relieve the hardship;
2. 
After granting the proposed relief, there is net environmental benefit from the restoration project;
3. 
Granting the proposed relief is consistent with the objectives of the shoreline restoration project and consistent with the shoreline master program; and
4. 
Where a shoreline restoration project is created as mitigation to obtain a development permit, the project proponent required to perform the mitigation is not eligible for relief under this section;
C. 
The application for relief must be submitted to the Department of Ecology for written approval or disapproval. This review must occur during the Department of Ecology's normal review of a shoreline substantial development permit, conditional use permit, or variance. If no such permit is required, then the Department of Ecology shall conduct its review when the city provides a copy of a complete application and all supporting information necessary to conduct the review.
1. 
Except as otherwise provided in subsection B of this section, the Department of Ecology shall provide at least twenty days' notice to parties that have indicated interest to the Department of Ecology in reviewing applications for relief under this section, and post the notice on their website.
2. 
The Department of Ecology shall act within thirty calendar days of close of the public notice period, or within thirty days of receipt of the proposal from the city if additional public notice is not required;
D. 
The public notice requirements of subsection (C)(1) of this section do not apply if the relevant shoreline restoration project was included in a shoreline master program or shoreline restoration plan as defined in WAC 173-26-201, as follows:
1. 
The restoration plan has been approved by the Department of Ecology under applicable shoreline master program guidelines;
2. 
The shoreline restoration project is specifically identified in the shoreline master program or restoration plan or is located along a shoreline reach identified in the shoreline master program or restoration plan as appropriate for granting relief from shoreline regulations; and
3. 
The shoreline master program or restoration plan includes policies addressing the nature of the relief and why, when, and how it would be applied;
E. 
A substantial development permit is not required on land within urban growth areas as defined in RCW 36.70A.030 that is brought under shoreline jurisdiction due to a shoreline restoration project creating a landward shift in the ordinary high water mark;
F. 
The definitions in this subsection apply throughout this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
1. 
"Shoreline restoration project"
means a project designed to restore impaired ecological function of a shoreline.
2. 
"Urban growth areas"
has the same meaning as defined in RCW 36.70A.030.
(Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A development or use that is listed as a conditional or special use pursuant to the Mukilteo shoreline master program, or is an unlisted use, must obtain a shoreline conditional use permit even though the development or use does not require a substantial development permit. When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional and performance standards of the Mukilteo master program, such development or use can only be authorized by approval of a shoreline variance.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
At the applicant's request, a preapplication conference shall be scheduled with representatives of the city planning, engineering, fire and building departments. The purpose of the preapplication process is for the applicant to provide city staff with the necessary information about the proposed project and site conditions so that the city can efficiently and effectively provide the applicant with the requirements that must be met in order to have the proposed project proceed through the formal review process.
B. 
For the city to accurately evaluate the proposed project at the preapplication conference, the applicant shall provide at a minimum a draft site plan, preliminary grading plan, building locations, identification of the ordinary high water mark if applicable, and locations of storm drainage and utility connections.
C. 
It is impossible for the conference to be an exhaustive review of all potential issues. The discussions at the conference shall not bind or prohibit the city's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws.
D. 
Applications shall only become vested once a complete application is accepted; a preapplication does not vest a project.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
Permit Applications. All development permit applications shall be subject to the city project review process. All shoreline development requiring a substantial development permit, conditional use permit or variance under this title shall be subject to regulations and review procedures of this title. Review of development permits shall be carried out by the city planning, engineering, building, and fire departments for consistency with the SMP and SMP development regulations.
B. 
Review Process. Development permits shall be submitted on the city approved application form and shall include a supplemental application which consists of the state approved JARPA form. Project review shall follow the underlying permit review process as described in this chapter. A supplemental application is required for conditional or special uses. In addition to the other requirements of this title, a shoreline permit application shall only be approved after the project has met the requirements of Chapter 90.58 RCW, Shoreline Management Act of 1971, Chapter 173-27 WAC, the Department of Ecology's Shoreline Guidelines, the Mukilteo comprehensive plan, and the Mukilteo shoreline master program for the particular use. Depending on the application, project permit application review may be administrative or require a public hearing by a city designated official, hearing examiner, or board. In addition to the other requirements of this title, the project permit application shall only be approved after the project has met all environmental, zoning, engineering and building regulations and standards for the particular use.
C. 
Fees. All applications shall be submitted with the appropriate fees as established by city council resolution. The fees are necessary to reimburse the city for costs associated with processing permits including, but not necessarily limited to, staff time, postage, legal notices, paper, duplicating costs, and mileage.
D. 
Modifications to Shoreline Related Permits. Minor modifications to the approved shoreline permit may be authorized according to Section 17B.13.170, Revisions to shoreline permits.
E. 
Conflict. Where there is a conflict between various development regulations, the most restrictive regulation shall apply.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
Determination of Completeness. Within twenty-eight calendar days after receiving a shoreline permit application, the city shall mail or personally provide a written determination of completeness to the applicant which states either: (1) that the application is complete; or (2) that the application is incomplete and state what additional information is necessary to make the application complete. Once an application is complete, it shall be vested under the laws governing development.
B. 
Identification of Other Agencies with Jurisdiction. To the extent known by the city, other agencies with jurisdiction over project permit application shall be identified in the city's determination of completeness as required above.
C. 
Additional Information. A project permit application is complete for purposes of this section when it meets the submission requirements outlined in Table 1 following this section. This determination of completeness shall be made when the application is sufficient for continued processing even though additional information may be required or project modifications may be undertaken subsequent to project review. If new information is required or where there are substantial changes in the proposed action, the city's determination of completeness shall not preclude the city from requesting additional information or studies either at the time of the determination of completeness or at some later time.
D. 
Incomplete Application Procedure. If the applicant received a determination of incompleteness from the city, the applicant shall have ninety calendar days to submit the necessary information to the city. Within fourteen calendar days after an applicant has submitted the requested additional information, the city shall prepare a written determination of completeness as described in the section above, and notify the applicant in the same manner.
E. 
Ninety Days for Resubmittals. If the applicant does not submit the required information within the ninety-day period, the planning director shall make findings that the application has lapsed for failure to submit the necessary information in a timely manner and close the project permit application file. The planning director may grant time extensions to submit the required information, not to exceed an additional ninety calendar days.
F. 
Refunds. In those situations where the application has lapsed because the applicant has failed to submit the required information within the necessary time period, or when the applicant requests their application be withdrawn, the applicant may obtain a refund of the unused portion of the application fee by submission of a written request to the planning department if a notice of application has not been issued. Refunds will be processed in accordance with the city's normal refund practices.
G. 
City's Failure to Provide a Determination of Completeness. If, within twenty-eight calendar days of the date of the submitted application, the city has not provided a written determination of completeness, an application shall be deemed complete as outlined in this section.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Submittal Requirements
Shoreline Substantial Permit
Shoreline Conditional or Special Use Permit
Shoreline Variance
GENERAL APPLICATION
application form (land use)
✓
✓
✓
supplemental application form
✓
✓
✓
project narrative
✓
✓
✓
review fee(s)
✓
✓
✓
height worksheet
•
✓
•
sewer/water/PUD availability letters
✓
✓
✓
SITE/BUILDING PLANS
site plan
✓
✓
✓
reduced site plan (max. 11 x 17)
✓
✓
✓
building construction plans
✓
•
•
building elevations/floor plans
✓
✓
✓
reduced elevations/floor plans
✓
✓
✓
landscape plan
✓
✓
•
reduced landscape
✓
✓
•
CIVIL/ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS
grading and clearing plan(s)
✓
✓
✓
drainage calculations/study
✓
✓
✓
road and drainage plans
✓
•
•
TESCP (erosion control)
✓
✓
✓
topography
✓
✓
✓
traffic study
•
•
•
water/sewer/utility plans
✓
✓
•
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
geotechnical report
•
•
•
SEPA checklist
✓
✓
•
stream class report
•
•
•
wetland report
•
•
•
wildlife habitat report
•
•
•
habitat management plan
•
•
•
archaeological survey
•
•
•
OTHER
access plan
•
•
•
cost/benefit analysis
•
•
•
cumulative impact analysis
•
•
•
operational plan
•
•
•
view analysis
•
•
•
BEFORE FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY:
as-builts
✓
•
•
reduced as-constructed plans
✓
•
•
as-constructed electronic
✓
•
•
sureties and bonds
✓
•
•
Footnotes:
In the codified version of this checklist, a "✓" indicates that the item is required for submittal.
Where "•" appears, these items may or may not be required. Contact the Mukilteo planning staff for assistance.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
Generally. A notice of application shall be issued on all project permits not expressly exempted by this chapter.
B. 
Contents. The notice of application shall include:
1. 
The date of the application, the date of the determination of completeness, and the date of the notice of application;
2. 
A description of the proposed project action and a list of the project permits included in the application and, if applicable, a list of any studies requested under SEPA;
3. 
Identification of other permits not included in the application, to the extent known by the city;
4. 
Identification of existing environmental documents that evaluate the proposed project and, if not otherwise stated on the document providing notice of application, the location where the application and any studies can be reviewed;
5. 
A statement of the limits of the public comment period, which shall be thirty calendar days following the date of the notice of application for shoreline applications, and statements of the right of any person to comment on the application, receive notice of and participate in any hearing, request a copy of the decision once made, and any appeal rights;
6. 
The date, time, place and type of hearing, if applicable and scheduled at the date of the notice of application if known;
7. 
A statement of preliminary determination of consistency, if one has been made at the time of the notice of application, and of those development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and consistency;
8. 
Any other information determined appropriate by the city.
C. 
Time Frame of Issuance of a Notice of Application. Within fourteen calendar days after the city has made a determination of completeness on an application, the city shall issue a notice of application. If an open record predecision hearing is required for the requested project permit, the notice of application shall be provided at least fifteen calendar days prior to the open record hearing.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
Noticing Requirements. All notices of application shall be noticed to the general public and property owners in the vicinity of such application by at least one of the following methods:
1. 
Mailing of the notice to the latest recorded real property owners as shown by the record of the county assessor within at least three hundred feet of the boundary of the property upon which the development is proposed;
2. 
Posting of the notice in a conspicuous manner on the property upon which the project is to be undertaken;
3. 
Any other manner deemed appropriate by the city to accomplish the objective of reasonable notice to adjacent landowners and the public;
4. 
Notice in the city's designated newspaper for public records. Shoreline permit notices shall be published at least once a week on the same day of the week for two consecutive weeks in the city's designated newspaper.
B. 
Agency Notification. The city shall provide notice to all agencies with jurisdiction per Chapter 43.21C RCW, state environmental policy, and to all other agencies that request in writing any such notice.
C. 
Public Comment on the Notice of Application. All public comments on the notice of application must be received by the planning department by four-thirty p.m. on the last day of the comment period. Comments may be mailed, emailed, personally delivered or sent by facsimile. Comments should be as specific as possible.
D. 
Noticing for Noise Variances. Noise variances must be noticed with a fourteen-day appeal period. Noise exemptions do not require any notice; however, it is the city's policy to send out courtesy notices to adjacent property owners informing them of the duration and timing of the proposed activity.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
When the city receives a permit application, consistency between the proposed project and the applicable regulations and comprehensive plan shall be determined through the process in this section and concurrently through the city's adopted SEPA ordinance.
B. 
Consistency. A permit application shall be granted only when the development proposed is consistent with the applicable requirements of:
1. 
The development standards contained in this title;
2. 
The policies and procedures of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, Chapter 90.58 RCW;
3. 
The provisions of the shoreline management permit and enforcement procedures, Chapter 173-27 WAC; and
4. 
The Mukilteo shoreline master program and development regulations.
C. 
In the absence of applicable development regulations, the city shall determine whether the city's adopted comprehensive plan and shoreline master program contain policies which address the unregulated impacts.
D. 
SEPA Analysis.
1. 
The city shall also review the application for compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Rules, Chapter 197-11 WAC, and the city's environmental policy ordinance, Chapter 17B.84, and shall:
a. 
Determine whether the applicable regulations require studies that adequately analyze the entire project permit application's specific probable adverse environmental impacts;
b. 
Determine if the applicable regulations require measures that adequately address such environmental impacts;
c. 
Determine whether additional studies are required and/or whether the application should be conditioned with additional mitigation measures; and
d. 
Provide prompt and coordinated review by government agencies and the public regarding compliance with applicable environmental laws and plans, including mitigation for specific project impacts that have not been considered and addressed at the plan or development regulation level.
2. 
In its review of a shoreline permit application, the city may determine that the requirements for environmental analysis, protection and mitigation measures in the applicable development regulations, comprehensive plan and/or in other applicable local, state or federal laws provide adequate analysis of and mitigation for the specific adverse environmental impacts of the application.
E. 
Conditions. The city may attach conditions to the approval of permits as necessary to ensure consistency of the project with the city regulations, the comprehensive plan, the Shoreline Management Act, and the Mukilteo shoreline master program.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
An application for a substantial development permit for a limited utility extension or for the construction of a bulkhead or other measures to protect a single-family residence and its appurtenant structures from shoreline erosion shall be subject to all of the requirements of this chapter except that WAC 173-27-120 shall be followed for time periods and procedures.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
The permit review process for project permits, as governed by the Regulatory Reform Act, Local Project Review Act, Chapter 36.70B RCW, provides for no more than one open record hearing and one closed record appeal. The open record hearing shall consist of the public hearing on the proposed development as well as any appeal hearing on a threshold determination (except for a determination of significance) or an appeal of an administrative decision. Appeal of a hearing board's final decision shall be heard during a closed record hearing before a single decision-making body or officer.
B. 
Table 2. Table 2 describes the open record and closed record hearing process for all permits subject to this title within the city. If any conflict arises between the hearing process described in Table 2 and other portions of the Mukilteo Municipal Code, the requirements of Table 2 shall prevail.
C. 
Public Hearing Notice. All public hearings shall be advertised in the city's designated newspaper at least ten calendar days prior to the public hearing date.
Table 2
Permit Authority and Public Hearing Process
Type I Administrative Decision (No Hearing Required)
Type II Hearing Examiner Decision (Open Record Hearing)
Type III Planning Commission Decision (Open Record Hearing)
Type IV Planning Commission Recommendation (Open Record Hearing)
Type V City Council Decision (Administrative Open Record Hearing)
Permitted Shoreline Substantial Development Applications
Shoreline Conditional Use, Variances, and SUPs
None
None
None
Shoreline Hearings Board appeals: within twenty-one days of the "date of filing" as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6)
All shoreline permit appeals (substantial, CU, variance, and SUP) shall be submitted to the State Shoreline Hearings Board
None
None
None
D. 
Joint Public Hearing. The community development director may combine any public hearing on a project permit application with any hearing that may be held by another local, state, regional, federal, or other agency, on the proposed action as long as: (1) the hearing is held within the city limits; (2) the requirements listed below are met; and (3) the city acts as the lead agency on the proposed application.
E. 
The applicant may request that the public hearing on a project permit application be combined with other required public hearings as long as the joint hearing is held within the time periods set forth in this chapter. In the alternative, the applicant may agree to a particular schedule if additional time is needed in order to complete the hearings.
F. 
A joint public hearing may be held with another local, state, regional, federal or other agency and the city on a project permit application as long as: (1) the other agency is not expressly prohibited by statute from doing so and has the authority to hold its public hearing in the city of Mukilteo; (2) sufficient notice of the hearing is given to meet each of the agencies' adopted notice requirements as set forth in statute, ordinance or rule; and (3) the agency has received sufficient notice and the necessary information about the proposed project to properly prepare, advertise, and hold its hearing at the same time as the local government.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
Following the completion of the administrative review or permit hearing, the application shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied and a written notice of decision shall be issued within ten calendar days. The notice of decision shall be issued within one hundred twenty calendar days after the city notifies the applicant that the application is complete, subject to any delays permitted by law.
B. 
To determine the number of days that have elapsed after the local government has notified the applicant that the project permit application is complete, the following periods shall be excluded:
1. 
Any period during which the applicant has been requested by the city to correct plans, perform required studies, or provide additional information;
2. 
Any period during which an environmental impact statement is being prepared following a determination of significance;
3. 
Any period for administrative appeals of project permits, if an open record appeal hearing or a closed record appeal, or both, are allowed;
4. 
Any extension of time mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the city.
C. 
The notice of decision shall include the final determination of approval or denial of the project, a statement of any threshold determination made under SEPA, and the procedure to appeal the notice of decision. The notice of decision shall be provided to the applicant and to any person who, prior to the rendering of the decision, has requested such notice or who submitted substantive comments about the application.
D. 
If the city is unable to issue its notice of decision within the one hundred twenty calendar days from the determination of completeness, it shall provide written notice to the project applicant including the reasons the time limits have not been met and an estimated date for issuance of the notice of decision.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
All shoreline applications for a permit or a permit revision shall be submitted to the Department of Ecology by return receipt requested mail upon a final decision by the city. Final decision by the city shall mean the notice of decision, whether it be an approval or denial, which is established after all local administrative appeals related to the permit have concluded or the opportunity to initiate such appeals has lapsed.
B. 
When a substantial development permit and a conditional use or variance permit are required for a development, the submittal on the permits shall be made concurrently.
C. 
A complete submittal shall consist of the following documents and information:
1. 
A copy of the complete application pursuant to WAC 173-27-180;
2. 
Findings and conclusions that establish the basis for the decision including but not limited to identification of shoreline environment designation, applicable master program policies and regulations and the consistency of the project with appropriate review criteria for the type of permit(s) as established in WAC 173-27-140 through 173-27-170;
3. 
The final decision of the city;
4. 
The permit data sheet required by WAC 173-27-190; and
5. 
Where applicable, the city shall also file the applicable documents required by Chapter 43.21C RCW, the State Environmental Policy Act, or in lieu thereof, a statement summarizing the actions and dates of such actions taken under Chapter 43.21C RCW.
D. 
When the project has been modified in the course of the local review process, plans or text shall be provided to the Department of Ecology that clearly indicates the final approved plan.
E. 
Submittal of substantial development permits, conditional use permits, variances, rescissions and revisions is complete when all of the documents required pursuant to subsections C and D of this section have been received by the Department of Ecology. If the Department of Ecology determines that the submittal does not contain all of the documents and information required by this section, the Department of Ecology shall identify the deficiencies and so notify the city and the applicant in writing. The submittal and permit are void unless and until the material requested in writing is submitted to the Department of Ecology.
F. 
"Date of filing"
of the city's final decision involving approval or denial of a substantial development permit, or involving a denial of a variance or conditional use permit, is the date of actual receipt of a complete submittal by the Department of Ecology.
G. 
"Date of filing"
of a permit for a conditional use or variance approved by the city, and such permits which also involve concurrent submittal by the city of a substantial development permit, is the date of transmittal of the Department of Ecology's final decision on the variance or conditional use permit to the city and the applicant.
H. 
The Department of Ecology shall provide a written notice to the local government and the applicant of the "date of filing."
I. 
When a permit has been appealed pursuant to RCW 90.58.180, upon conclusion of all review proceedings, a copy of the final order shall be provided to the city and the Department of Ecology. When the project has been modified in the course of the review proceeding, plans or text shall be provided to the city, consistent with the provisions of WAC 173-27-180, that clearly indicate the final approved plan, and the city shall reissue the permit accordingly and submit a copy of the reissued permit and supporting documents consistent with subsection C of this section to the Department of Ecology for completion of the file on the permit.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
Shoreline Permit Applications. The following time requirements shall apply to all shoreline development permits and to any development authorized pursuant to a variance or conditional use permit.
1. 
Upon a finding of good cause, based on the requirements and circumstances of the project proposed and consistent with the policy and provisions of the master program and the Act, the city may adopt appropriate time limits as a part of action on a substantial development permit or essential public facility with the approval of the Department of Ecology, and the city may adopt appropriate time limits as a part of action on a conditional use or variance permit. "Good cause based on the requirements and circumstances of the project" shall mean that the time limits established are reasonably related to the time actually necessary to perform the development on the ground and complete the project that is being permitted, and/or are necessary for the protection of shoreline resources.
2. 
Where neither the city nor the Department of Ecology include specific provisions establishing time limits on a permit as a part of action on the permit, the following time limits shall apply:
a. 
Construction shall be commenced or, where no construction is involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within two years of the effective date of a shoreline permit; provided, that the city may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and the Department of Ecology.
b. 
Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a shoreline permit; provided, that the city may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and the Department of Ecology.
3. 
The effective date of a shoreline permit shall be the date of the last action required on the shoreline permit and all other government permits and approvals that authorize the development to proceed, including all administrative and legal actions on any such permit or approval. It is the responsibility of the applicant to inform the city of the pendency of other permit applications filed with agencies other than the city and of any related administrative and legal actions on any permit or approval. If no notice of the pendency of other permits or approvals is given to the city prior to the date established by the shoreline permit or the provisions of this section, the expiration of a permit shall be based on the shoreline permit.
4. 
Construction under an approved permit shall not begin and is not authorized until twenty-one days from the date of filing with the Department of Ecology, or until all review proceedings and appeal processes have been completed.
5. 
When permit approval is based on conditions, such conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy or use of a structure or prior to commencement of a nonstructural activity; provided, that an alternative compliance limit may be specified in the permit.
6. 
The city shall notify the Department of Ecology in writing of any change to the effective date of a permit, as authorized by this section, with an explanation of the basis for approval of the change. Any change to the time limits of a permit other than those authorized by this section shall require a new permit application.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
A. 
A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substantive changes to the design, terms or conditions of a project from that which is approved in the permit. Changes are substantive if they materially alter the project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of the permit, the master program and/or the policies and provisions of Chapter 90.58 RCW. Changes which are not substantive in effect do not require approval of a revision. When an applicant seeks to revise a permit, local government shall request from the applicant detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes.
B. 
If the city determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, and are consistent with the applicable master program and the Act, the city may approve a revision. "Within the scope and intent of the original permit" means all of the following:
1. 
No additional over water construction is involved except that pier, dock, or float construction may be increased by five hundred square feet or ten percent from the provisions of the original permit, whichever is less;
2. 
Ground area coverage and height may be increased a maximum of ten percent from the provisions of the original permit;
3. 
The revised permit does not authorize development to exceed height, lot coverage, setback, or any other requirements of the applicable master program except as authorized under a variance granted as the original permit or a part thereof;
4. 
Additional or revised landscaping is consistent with any conditions attached to the original permit and with the applicable master program;
5. 
The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed; and
6. 
No adverse environmental impact will be caused by the project revision.
C. 
Revisions to permits may be authorized after original permit authorization has expired under WAC 173-27-100. The purpose of such revisions shall be limited to authorization of changes which are consistent with this section and which would not require a permit for the development or change proposed under the terms of Chapter 90.58 RCW, this regulation and the local master program. If the proposed change constitutes substantial development then a new permit is required, provided this subsection shall not be used to extend the time requirements or to authorize substantial development beyond the time limits of the original permit.
D. 
If the sum of the revision and any previously approved revisions violate the provisions of this section, local government shall require that the applicant apply for a new permit.
E. 
The revision approval, including the revised site plans and text consistent with the provisions of WAC 173-27-180 as necessary to clearly indicate the authorized changes, and the final ruling on consistency with this section shall be filed with the Department of Ecology. In addition, the city shall notify parties of record of their action.
F. 
If the revision to the original permit involves a conditional use or variance, the city shall submit the revision to the Department of Ecology for approval, approval with conditions, or denial, and shall indicate that the revision is being submitted under the requirements of this subsection. The Department of Ecology shall render and transmit to the city and the applicant its final decision within fifteen days of the date of Ecology's receipt of the submittal from the city. The city shall then notify parties of record of Ecology's final decision.
G. 
The revised permit is effective immediately upon final decision by the city or upon final action by the Department of Ecology.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)
Any person aggrieved by the granting, denying, or rescinding of a permit on shorelines of the state pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 may seek review from the shorelines hearings board by filing a petition for review within twenty-one days of the date of filing as defined in Chapter 90.58 RCW.
(Ord. 1295 § 10 (Exh. 1B) (part), 2011; Ord. 1427 § 3 (Exh. C) (part), 2019)