(A)
Authority. The city adopts this chapter under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.120, and the SEPA procedures, WAC 197-11-904. This chapter contains the city's SEPA procedures and policies. The SEPA rules, Chapter 197-11 WAC, must be used in conjunction with this chapter.
(B)
General Requirements.
(1)
Purpose of Section and Additions by Reference. The purpose of this section is to establish a clearly understood and effective set of policies and procedures for implementing the State Environmental Policy Act as set forth in Chapter 43.21C RCW. The sections of the SEPA rules hereinafter set forth by number are adopted by reference as if fully set forth. Copies of the statute and the rules (Chapter 197-11 WAC) shall be kept available for public inspection at City Hall. This section contains the basic requirements that apply to the SEPA process. The city adopts Chapter 197-11 WAC by reference.
(C)
SEPA Policies. The city designates the following general policies as the basis for the city's exercise of authority pursuant to this chapter:
(1)
The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs and resources.
(2)
The city recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment, and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.
(3)
The city incorporates by reference all policies in the cited city codes, ordinances, resolutions and plans, and all amendments to them in effect prior to the date of a technically complete application of any building permit or preliminary plat, or prior to issuance of a declaration of nonsignificance (DNS) or draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for any other action. These documents include, but are not limited to, the following: Granite Falls comprehensive plan and incorporated elements, development code, critical area regulations, shoreline master program, International Building Code, International Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, International Mechanical Code, Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, flood damage prevention regulations, six-year transportation improvement program, stormwater comprehensive plan, water and sewer utility plans and regulations, park and recreation plan, public works standards, Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code, Washington State Energy Code, International Existing Building Code, International Green Construction Code, International Residential Code, International Property Maintenance Code, International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, and International Housing Code.
(4)
Through the project review process:
(a)
If the applicable regulations require studies that adequately analyze all of the project's specific probable adverse environmental impacts, additional studies under this chapter will not be necessary on those impacts;
(b)
If the applicable regulations require measures that adequately address such environmental impacts, additional measures would likewise not be required under this chapter; and
(c)
If the applicable regulations do not adequately analyze or address a proposal's specific probable adverse environmental impacts, this chapter provides the authority and procedures for additional review.
(D)
Additional Definitions. In addition to those definitions contained within WAC 197-11-700 through 197-11-799, when used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context indicates otherwise:
(1) "Closed record approval hearing"
means an administrative hearing to approve or deny a project permit that is on the record to the city council following an open record predecision hearing (as defined by WAC 197-11-775 and this section) before the hearing examiner.
(2) "Open record hearing"
means an open record hearing (as defined by WAC 197-11-775) which is held before the hearing examiner prior to the closed record approval hearing before the city council.
(3) "Ordinance"
means the ordinance, resolution or other procedure used by the city to adopt regulatory requirements.
(4) "SEPA rules"
means Chapter 197-11 WAC adopted by the Department of Ecology.
(E)
Designation of Designated Official.
(1)
For those proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the designated official shall be the SEPA responsible official as defined by WAC 197-11-788.
(2)
For all proposals for which the city is the lead agency, the designated official shall make the threshold determination, supervise scoping and preparation of any required environmental impact statement (EIS), and perform any other functions assigned to the lead agency or designated official by those sections of the SEPA rules that were adopted by reference in WAC 173-806-020.
(F)
Lead Agency Determination and Responsibilities.
(1)
The city shall be the lead agency for any nonexempt action, WAC 197-11-050, 197-11-253, and 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, unless the lead agency has been previously determined or the city is aware that another agency is in the process of determining the lead agency.
(2)
When the city is the lead agency for a proposal, the administrator shall determine the designated official designee who shall supervise compliance with the threshold determination requirements, and, if an environmental impact statement (EIS) is necessary, shall supervise preparation of the EIS.
(3)
When the city is not the lead agency for a proposal, all departments of the city shall use and consider, as appropriate, either the determination of nonsignificance (DNS) or the final EIS of the lead agency in making decisions on the proposal. No city department shall prepare or require preparation of a DNS or EIS in addition to that prepared by the lead agency, unless required under WAC 197-11-600. In some cases, the city may conduct supplemental environmental review under WAC 197-11-600.
(4)
If the city receives a lead agency determination made by another agency that appears inconsistent with the criteria of WAC 197-11-253 or 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, it may object to the determination. Any objection must be made to the agency originally making the determination and resolved within 15 days of receipt of the determination, or the city must petition the Department of Ecology for a lead agency determination under WAC 197-11-946 within the 15-day time period.
(5)
When the city is lead agency for a Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) remedial action, the Department of Ecology shall be provided an opportunity under WAC 197-11-253(5) to review the environmental documents prior to public notice being provided. If the SEPA and MTCA documents are issued together with one public comment period under WAC 197-11-253(6), the city shall decide jointly with the Department of Ecology who receives the comment letters and how copies of the comment letters will be distributed to the other agency.
(G)
Additional Timing Considerations.
(1)
For nonexempt proposals, the DNS or final EIS for the proposal shall accompany the city's staff recommendation to the appropriate advisory body, if any.
(2)
If the city's only action on a proposal is a decision on a building permit or other license that requires detailed project plans and specifications, the applicant may request in writing that the city conduct environmental review prior to submission of the detailed plans and specifications. Sufficient information shall be required from the applicant to enable the designated official to adequately fulfill his responsibility under SEPA and this chapter consistent with the provisions of WAC 197-11-100 and 197-11-335, which sections are adopted by reference in this chapter.
(H)
Categorical Exemptions and Threshold Determinations.
(1)
Purpose. This section contains the rules for deciding whether a proposal has a probable significant, adverse environmental impact requiring an environmental impact statement (EIS) to be prepared. This section also contains rules for evaluating the impacts of proposals not requiring an EIS.
(2)
Categorical Exceptions – Adoption by Reference. The city adopts the rules of WAC 197-11-800, as now existing and hereafter amended, by reference as supplemented by this chapter.
(3)
Flexible Thresholds for Categorical Exemptions. The city establishes the following exempt levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800(1) based on local conditions:
(a)
The construction or location of any single-family residential structures of 30 dwelling units or fewer.
(b)
The construction or location of any multifamily residential structures of less than or equal to 60 dwelling units.
(c)
The construction of a barn, loafing shed, farm equipment storage building, produce storage or packing structure, or similar agricultural structure, covering 40,000 square feet or less, and to be used only by the property owner or his or her agent in the conduct of farming the property. This exemption shall not apply to feed lots.
(d)
The construction of an office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage building with 30,000 square feet or less of gross floor area, and with associated parking facilities and/or independent parking facility designed for 90 parking spaces or fewer.
(f)
The exemptions in this subsection apply except when the project:
(i)
Is undertaken wholly or partly on lands covered by water;
(ii)
Requires a license governing discharges to water that is not exempt under RCW 43.21C.0383;
(iii)
Requires a license governing emissions to air that is not exempt under RCW 43.21C.0381 or WAC 197-11-800(7) or (8); or
(iv)
Requires a land use decision that is not exempt under WAC 197-11-800(6).
(4)
New Exemption Levels. Whenever the city establishes new exempt levels under this section, it shall send them to the Department of Ecology, headquarters office, Olympia, WA 98504, under WAC 197-11-800(1)(c).
(5)
Threshold Determination Process – Adoption by Reference. The city adopts by reference the threshold determination process as stipulated under WAC 197-11-330, as now existing and hereafter amended.
(I)
Emergencies. Actions which must be undertaken immediately, or within a time frame too short
to allow full compliance with this chapter, to avoid an immediate threat to public health and safety, to prevent an immediate danger to public or private property, or to prevent an imminent threat of serious environmental degradation, shall be exempt from the procedural requirements of this chapter. The designated official shall determine on a case-by-case basis emergency actions which satisfy the general requirements of this section.
(J)
Use of Exemptions.
(1)
In determining whether or not a proposal is exempt, the designated official shall make certain the proposal is properly defined and shall identify the governmental licenses required (WAC 197-11-060). If a proposal includes exempt and nonexempt actions, the city shall determine the lead agency even if the license application that triggers the city's consideration is exempt.
(2)
If a proposal includes both exempt and nonexempt actions, the city may authorize exempt actions prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of this chapter, except that:
(b)
The city may withhold approval of an exempt action that would lead to modification of the physical environment, when such modification would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved; and
(c)
The city may withhold approval of exempt actions that would lead to substantial financial expenditures by a private applicant when the expenditures would serve no purpose if nonexempt action(s) were not approved.
(K)
Environmental Checklist.
(1)
A completed environmental checklist (or a copy) in the form provided on the city's web site or at City Hall shall be filed at the same time as an application for a permit, license certificate, or other approval not specifically exempted in this chapter; except for:
(a)
Public proposals where the city of lead agency has decided to prepare an EIS; or
(b)
Proposals on which the city and applicant agree an EIS will be prepared; or
(c)
Projects which are proposed as planned actions; or
(d)
Projects where questions on the environmental checklist are adequately covered by existing legal authorities pursuant to subsection (K)(5) of this section; or
(e)
Nonproject proposals where the city determines that questions on Part B of the environmental checklist do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. In such cases, Parts A, C, and D of the environmental checklist at a minimum shall be completed.
(2)
For private proposals, the city will require the applicant to complete the environmental checklist, providing assistance as necessary. For city proposals, the department initiating the proposal shall complete the environmental checklist for that proposal.
(3)
The city may require that it, and not the private applicant, will complete all or part of the environmental checklist for a private proposal, at the applicant's costs under the current fee schedule, if either of the following occurs:
(4)
For projects submitted as planned actions under WAC 197-11-164, the city shall use its existing environmental checklist form or may modify the environmental checklist form as provided in WAC 197-11-315. The modified environmental checklist form may be prepared and adopted along with or as part of a planned action ordinance, or developed after the ordinance is adopted. In either case, a proposed modified environmental checklist form must be sent to the Department of Ecology to allow at least a 30-day review prior to use.
(5)
Pursuant to WAC 192-11-315(6), the city may identify questions on the environmental checklist adequately covered by adopted ordinance, development regulation, land use plan, or other legal authority. The city still must consider whether the action has an impact on the particular element or elements of the environment in question.
(a)
In instances where the adopted ordinance, development regulation, land use plan, or other legal authority provide the necessary information to answer a specific question, the city shall explain how the proposed project satisfies the underlying legal authority.
(b)
If the city identifies instances where questions on the environmental checklist are adequately covered by adopted ordinance, development regulation, land use plan, or other legal authority, an applicant may still provide answers to any question on the environmental checklist.
(c)
The city shall not ignore or delete a question on the environmental checklist.
(6)
The city may determine the appropriate methods for receipt of electronic submittals of the environmental checklist from applicants including electronic signature of Part C of the environmental checklist.
(7)
The city may include helpful information (including web links) in the environmental checklist to assist applicants in completing the questions.
(L)
Mitigated DNS.
(1)
As provided in this section and in WAC 197-11-350, the designated official may issue a DNS based on conditions attached to the proposal by the designated official or on changes to, or clarifications of, the proposal made by the applicant.
(2)
An applicant may request in writing early notice of whether a declaration of significance (DS) is likely under WAC 197-11-350. The request must:
(3)
The designated official should respond to the request for early notice within 15 calendar days. The response shall:
(a)
Be written;
(b)
State whether the city currently considers issuance of a DS likely and, if so, indicate the general or specific area(s) of concern that is/are leading the city to consider a DS; and
(c)
State that the applicant may change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the indicated impacts, revising the environmental checklist and/or permit application as necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.
(4)
As much as possible, the city should assist the applicant with identification of impacts to the extent necessary to formulate mitigation measures.
(5)
When an applicant submits a changed or clarified proposal, along with a revised or amended environmental checklist, the city shall base its threshold determination on the changed or clarified proposal and should make the determination within 15 days of receiving the changed or clarified proposal:
(a)
If the city indicated specific mitigation measures in its response to the request for early notice, and the applicant changed or clarified the proposal to include those specific mitigation measures, the city shall issue and circulate a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2);
(b)
If the city indicated areas of concern, but did not indicate specific mitigation measures that would allow it to issue a DNS, the city shall make the threshold determination, issuing a DNS or DS as appropriate;
(c)
The applicant's proposed mitigation measures (clarifications, changes or conditions) must be in writing and must be specific. For example, proposals to "control noise" or "prevent stormwater runoff" are inadequate, whereas proposals to "muffle machinery to X decibel" or "construct 200-foot stormwater retention pond at Y location" are adequate;
(d)
Mitigation measures which justify issuance of a mitigated DNS may be incorporated in the DNS by reference to agency staff reports, studies or other documents.
(6)
Any mitigated DNS issued under WAC 197-11-340(2) shall require a 14-day comment period and public notice, or WAC 197-11-355, which may require no additional comment period beyond the comment period on the notice of application.
(7)
Mitigation measures incorporated in the mitigated DNS shall be deemed conditions of approval of the permit decision and may be enforced in the same manner as any term or condition of the permit, or enforced in any manner specifically prescribed by the city.
(8)
The city's written response under subsection (L)(3) of this section shall not be construed as a determination of significance. In addition, preliminary discussion of clarifications or changes to a proposal, as opposed to a written request for early notice, shall not bind the city to consider the clarifications or changes in its threshold determination.
(M)
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
(1)
Purpose of Section and Adoption by Reference. This section contains the rules for preparing environmental impact statements.
(2)
Preparation of EIS.
(a)
Preparation of draft and final EISs (DEIS and FEIS) and draft and final supplemental EISs (SEIS) is the responsibility of the designated official. Before the city issues an EIS, the designated official shall be satisfied that it complies with this chapter and Chapter 197-11 WAC.
(b)
The DEIS and FEIS or draft and final SEIS shall be prepared by city staff, the applicant, or by a consultant selected by the city or the applicant, at the discretion of the designated official. If the designated official requires an EIS for a proposal and determines that someone other than the city will prepare the EIS, the designated official shall notify the applicant immediately after completion of the threshold determination. The designated official shall also notify the applicant of the city's procedure for EIS preparation, including approval of the DEIS and FEIS prior to distribution.
(c)
The city may require an applicant to provide information the city does not possess, including specific investigations. However, the applicant is not required to supply information that is not required under this chapter or that is being requested from another agency. (This does not apply to information the city may request under another ordinance or statute.)
(3)
Additional Elements. The following additional elements are part of the environment for the purpose of EIS content, but do not add to the criteria for threshold determinations or perform any other function or purpose under this chapter:
(4)
Commenting.
(a)
Purpose. This section contains rules for consulting, commenting, and responding on all environmental documents under SEPA, including rules for public notice and hearings.
(b)
Adoption by Reference (WAC 173-806-128). The city adopts the following sections by reference:
WAC 197-11-502 | Inviting comment. |
WAC 197-11-504 | Availability and cost of environmental documents. |
WAC 197-11-508 | SEPA register. |
WAC 197-11-535 | Public hearings and meetings. |
WAC 197-11-545 | Effect of no comment. |
WAC 197-11-550 | Specificity of comments. |
WAC 197-11-560 | FEIS response to comments. |
(N)
Public Notice.
(1)
Whenever possible, the city shall integrate the public notice required under this section with existing notice procedures for the city's nonexempt permit(s) or approval(s) required for the proposal.
(2)
Whenever the city issues a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2) or a DS under WAC 197-11-360, the city shall give public notice as follows:
(a)
If an environmental document is issued concurrently with the notice of application, the public notice requirements for the notice of application in RCW 36.70B.110(4) will suffice to meet the SEPA public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1).
(3)
Whenever the city issues a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the city shall state the scoping procedure for the proposal in the DS as required in WAC 197-11-408 and in the public notice.
(4)
If a DNS is issued using the optional DNS process, the public notice requirements for a notice of application in RCW 36.70B.110(4) as supplemented by the requirements in WAC 197-11-355 will suffice to meet the SEPA public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1)(b).
(5)
Whenever the city issues a DEIS under WAC 197-11-455 or an SEIS under WAC 197-11-620, notice of the availability of those documents shall be given by:
(6)
Public notice for projects that qualify as planned actions shall be tied to the underlying permit as specified in WAC 197-11-172(3).
(7)
The city may require an applicant to complete the public notice requirements for the applicant's proposal at his or her expense.
(O)
Official to Perform Consulted Agency Responsibilities.
(1)
The designated official shall be responsible for preparation of written comments for the city in response to a consultation request prior to a threshold determination, participation in scoping, and reviewing a DEIS.
(2)
The designated official shall be responsible for the city's compliance with WAC 197-11-550 whenever the city is a consulted agency and is authorized to develop operating procedures that will ensure that responses to consultation requests are prepared in a timely fashion and include data from all appropriate departments of the city.
(P)
Using Existing Environmental Documents.
(1)
Purpose. This section contains rules for using and supplementing existing environmental documents prepared under SEPA or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for the city's own environmental compliance.
(Q)
SEPA and Agency Decisions.
(1)
Purpose. This section contains rules and policies for SEPA's substantive authority, such as decisions to mitigate or reject proposals as a result of SEPA. This section also contains procedures for appealing SEPA determinations to agencies or the courts.
(2)
Substantive Authority.
(a)
The policies and goals set forth in this chapter are supplementary to those in the existing authorization of the city of Granite Falls.
(b)
The city may attach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal so long as:
(i)
Such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable adverse environmental impacts identified in environmental documents prepared pursuant to this chapter; and
(ii)
Such conditions are in writing; and
(iii)
The mitigation measures included in such conditions are reasonable and capable of being accomplished; and
(iv)
The city has considered whether other local, state, or federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts; and
(c)
The city may deny a permit or approval for a proposal on the basis of SEPA so long as:
(i)
A finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental impacts that are identified in an FEIS or final SEIS prepared pursuant to this chapter; and
(ii)
A finding is made that there are no reasonable mitigation measures capable of being accomplished that are sufficient to mitigate the identified impact; and
(d)
The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs, and resources to the end that the state and its citizens may:
(i)
Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;
(ii)
Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings;
(iii)
Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;
(iv)
Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage;
(v)
Maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;
(vi)
Achieve balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life's amenities; and
(vii)
Enhance the quality of a renewable resource and approach the maximum attainable recycling of depletable resources.
(e)
The city recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.
(f)
The city designates and adopts by reference all policies in the cited city codes, ordinances, resolutions and plans, and all amendments to them in effect prior to the date of a technically complete application of any building permit or preliminary plat, or prior to issuance of a DNS or DEIS for any other action.
(3)
Notice – Statute of Limitations.
(a)
The city, applicant for, or proponent of an action may publish a notice of action pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080 for any action.
(b)
The form of the notice shall be substantially in the form provided in WAC 197-11-990. The notice shall be published pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080.
(4)
SEPA Appeals.
(a)
Purpose. It is the purpose of this chapter to combine environmental considerations with public decisions and, for this reason, any appeal brought under this chapter shall be linked to a specific governmental action. Appeals under this chapter are not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action.
(b)
Procedures. Any decision by a nonelected official conditioning or denying a proposal under authority of SEPA may be appealed to the city's hearing examiner. The administrative appeal procedures provided by this section shall be construed consistently with Chapter 36.70B RCW, RCW 43.21.075, and WAC 197-11-680.
(c)
Limited Actions. Appeals under the provisions of this section shall be limited solely to those actions and/or determinations listed below. No administrative appeals shall be allowed for other actions and/or determinations taken or made pursuant to this chapter (such as lead agency determination, scoping, draft EIS adequacy, etc.).
(i)
"Procedural appeals" which shall consist of an appeal of the designated official's compliance with the provisions of SEPA, the SEPA rules, and this chapter with respect to the following:
(ii)
"Substantive appeals" which shall consist of an appeal of an action or omission with respect to the conditioning or denying of a proposal under the substantive authority set forth in this section.
(d)
Appeal of Nonelected Official Decision to City Council Eliminated. As provided for in RCW 43.21C.060, any appeal to the city council of any decision by a nonelected official conditioning or denying a proposal under the authority of SEPA is hereby formally eliminated.
(5)
Consolidation. Except as provided in subsection (Q)(4) of this section, an appeal under this section shall consolidate any SEPA appeal with a hearing or appeal on the underlying governmental action in a single simultaneous hearing before the hearing examiner. The hearing or appeal shall be one at which the hearing examiner will consider either the agency's decision or a recommendation on the proposed underlying governmental action. If no hearing or appeal on the underlying governmental action is otherwise provided, then no SEPA appeal is allowed under this section, except as allowed under subsection (Q)(4) of this section.
(6)
Exceptions to Consolidation. The following appeals of SEPA procedural or substantive determinations need not be consolidated with a hearing or appeal on the underlying governmental action:
(a)
An appeal of a determination of significance;
(b)
An appeal of a procedural determination made by the city when the city is a project proponent, or is funding a project, and chooses to conduct its review under this chapter, including any appeals of its procedural determinations, prior to submitting an application for project permit;
(c)
An appeal of a procedural determination made by the city on a nonproject action.
(7)
Written Notice. All procedural and substantive SEPA appeals provided under this section shall be initiated by filing a written notice of SEPA administrative appeal with the designated official, accompanied with the applicable appeal fee. No additional appellate fee shall be charged in conjunction with a hearing on the underlying permit or approval.
(a)
The notice of appeal required by this section shall include, at a minimum:
(b)
The designated official shall arrange to conduct the SEPA appeal in conjunction with a hearing or appeal on the underlying permit or approval, where required to consolidate the SEPA appeal with a hearing on the underlying governmental action. Where consolidation is not required, the designated official shall schedule the hearing to be conducted within 90 days of the date of filing the notice of appeal, and payment of fee.
(8)
SEPA Procedural Appeals. SEPA procedural appeals shall be initiated and conducted in the manner set forth below:
(a)
An appeal to the issuance of a determination of nonsignificance (DNS), mitigated determination of nonsignificance (MDNS), may be filed by any agency or aggrieved person as follows:
(i)
For proposals which may be approved by the designated official without public hearing, an appeal shall be filed within 10 calendar days following the last day of the comment period. Such SEPA appeal shall be heard in conjunction with the appeal of the underlying permit or approval, where such appeal is allowed; provided, that if no administrative appeal of the underlying permit or approval is otherwise provided for, and consolidation is not required by subsection (Q)(5) of this section, an appeal of the DNS/FEIS shall be heard and decided in an open record hearing by the hearing examiner. The decision of the hearing examiner on the SEPA procedural appeal shall be final and not subject to further administrative appeal.
(ii)
For proposals which may only be approved by open record hearing or open record predecision hearing (recommendation) before the hearing examiner, an appeal shall be filed within 10 calendar days following the last day of the comment period, or where no comment period is required, then within 10 days following the date of issuance or adoption of the DNS/FEIS, and shall be heard and decided in open record hearing by the hearing examiner in conjunction with the decision or recommendation on the underlying proposal. The decision of the hearing examiner on the SEPA procedural appeal shall be final and not subject to further administrative appeal.
(b)
An appeal to a determination of significance (DS) may be filed by the applicant within 10 days of the issuance of the DS/scoping notice. The appeal shall be heard in open record hearing and decided by a hearing examiner, whose decision shall be final and not subject to further administrative appeal.
(c)
An appeal must be filed within 10 days of issuance of the final environmental impact statement (FEIS).
(d)
The SEPA procedural determination of the designated official shall be entitled to substantial weight, and the appellant shall bear the burden to establish a violation of SEPA, the SEPA rules, or the provisions of this chapter.
(e)
A SEPA procedural determination shall be deemed to be conclusively in compliance with SEPA, the SEPA rules, and the provisions of this chapter, unless a SEPA procedural appeal is filed in accordance with this section.
(9)
SEPA Substantive Appeals. SEPA substantive appeals shall be initiated and conducted in the manner set forth below:
(a)
For proposals subject to final administrative action, approval, or recommendation by a nonelected administrative official or tribunal for which no administrative appeal is otherwise provided, and for which consolidation is not required by subsection (Q)(5) of this section, any agency or aggrieved person may file a substantive SEPA appeal within 10 days of the issuance of the administrative decision approving, conditioning, or denying the proposal on the basis of substantive SEPA authority. Such substantive SEPA appeal shall be heard and decided by the hearing examiner in an open record hearing, unless the proposal is a project permit which has been subject to a previous open record hearing, in which case the SEPA appeal hearing shall be a closed record hearing. The substantive SEPA appeal shall be heard in conjunction with any procedural SEPA appeal. The decision of the hearing examiner on the SEPA substantive appeal shall be final and not be subject to further administrative appeal.
(b)
For all proposals subject to final administrative action, approval, or recommendation, by a nonelected administrative official, for which an administrative appeal or further approval hearing is otherwise provided or required, any agency or aggrieved person may file a substantive SEPA appeal within 10 days of the issuance of the administrative decision approving, conditioning, or denying the proposal on the basis of substantive SEPA authority; provided, that if the proposal is a project permit, a substantive SEPA appeal shall be filed within 10 days after issuance of the notice of decision. Any substantive SEPA appeal shall be conducted in the same manner and with the same process as otherwise provided for the appeal or approval hearing of the underlying administrative action.
(c)
The SEPA substantive determination to condition or deny a proposal shall be deemed to be conclusively in compliance with SEPA, the SEPA rules, and the provisions of this chapter, unless a SEPA substantive appeal is filed in accordance with this section.
(10)
How to Appeal. The appeal must be in the form of a written notice of appeal, and must contain a brief and concise statement of the matter being appealed, the specific components or aspects that are being appealed, the appellant's basic rationale or contentions on appeal, and a statement demonstrating standing to appeal. The appeal may also contain whatever supplemental information the appellant wishes to include. The appeal shall also contain the following:
(a)
The name and mailing address of the appellant and the name and address of his/her representative, if any;
(b)
The appellant's legal residence or principal place of business;
(c)
A copy of the decision which is appealed;
(d)
The grounds upon which the appellant relies;
(e)
A concise statement of the factual and legal reasons for the appeal;
(f)
The specific nature and intent of the relief sought;
(g)
A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the contents to be true, followed by his/her signature and the signature of his/her representative, if any. If the appealing party is unavailable to sign the appeal, it may be signed by his/her representative.
(11)
Fees. The person filing the appeal shall include with the letter of appeal the fee as established by resolution.
(12)
Procedures for Appeal Hearing.
(a)
Notice of the Appeal Hearing.
(i)
Content. The designated official shall prepare a notice of the appeal containing the following:
A.
The file number and a brief written description of the matter being appealed.
B.
A statement of the scope of the appeal including a summary of the specific factual findings and conclusions disputed in the letter of appeal.
C.
The time and place of the public hearing on the appeal.
D.
A statement of who may participate in the appeal.
E.
A statement of how to participate in the appeal.
(ii)
Distribution. At least 15 calendar days before the hearing on the appeal, the designated official shall send a copy of this notice to each person who received a copy of the threshold determination and any person who submitted written comments on, or an appeal of, the threshold determination.
(iii)
Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal may be combined with the hearing notice for the underlying project permit, if applicable.
(13)
Participation in the Appeal. Only those persons with legal standing are entitled to appeal the threshold determination and may participate in the appeal. Participation includes the following:
(a)
By submitting written testimony to the designated official in the timeline established.
(b)
By appearing in person, or through a representative, at the hearing and submitting oral or written testimony directly to the hearing body. The hearing body may reasonably limit the extent of the oral testimony to facilitate the orderly and timely conduct of the hearing.
(14)
Staff Report on the Appeal.
(a)
Content. The designated official shall prepare a staff report containing the following:
(i)
The SEPA threshold determination.
(ii)
All written comments submitted to the designated official.
(iii)
The letter of appeal.
(iv)
All written comments on the appeal received by the designated official from persons entitled to participate in the appeal and within the scope of the appeal.
(v)
An analysis of the specific factual findings and conclusions disputed in the letter of appeal.
(b)
Combining of Reports. This report may be combined with the staff report on the underlying project permit, if applicable.
(c)
Distribution. Distribution will take place at least seven calendar days before the hearing; the designated official shall distribute copies of the staff report as follows:
(15)
Continuation of the Hearing. The hearing examiner may continue the hearing if, for any reason, it is unable to hear all of the public comments on the appeal or if it determines that it needs more information within the scope of the appeal. If, during the hearing, the hearing examiner announces the time and place of the next hearing on the matter, no further notice of that hearing need be given, beyond that required by the Open Public Meetings Act.
(16)
Decision on the Appeal.
(a)
General. The hearing examiner shall consider all information and material within the scope of the appeal submitted by persons entitled to participate in the appeal. The hearing examiner shall either affirm or change the findings and conclusions of the designated official that were appealed. Based on the hearing examiner's findings and conclusions, it shall either:
(b)
Issuance of Written Decision. Within 10 working days after the public hearing, the hearing examiner shall issue a written decision on the appeal. Within four calendar days after the decision is issued, the hearing body shall distribute the decision as follows:
(17)
Additional Appeal Procedures.
(a)
The matters to be considered and decided upon in the appeal are limited to the matters raised in the notice of appeal.
(b)
The decision of the designated official shall be accorded substantial weight.
(c)
All testimony will be taken under oath.
(d)
The decision of the hearing examiner hearing the appeal shall be the final decision on any appeal of a threshold determination including a mitigated determination of nonsignificance.
(18)
Dismissal of Appeal. The hearing examiner may summarily dismiss an appeal without hearing when such an appeal is determined by the hearing examiner to be without merit on its face, frivolous, or brought merely to secure a delay, or that the appellant lacks legal standing to appeal.
(19)
Effect of Appeal. The filing of an appeal of a threshold determination or adequacy of a final environmental impact statement (FEIS) shall stay the effect of such determination or adequacy of the FEIS and no major action in regard to a proposal may be taken during the pendency of an appeal and until the appeal is finally disposed of by the hearing examiner. A decision to reverse the determination of the designated official and uphold the appeal shall further stay any decision, proceedings, or actions in regard to approval.
(20)
Withdrawal of Appeal. An appeal may be withdrawn, only by the appellant, by written request filed with the city clerk who shall inform the hearing examiner of the withdrawal request. If the withdrawal is requested before the response of the designated official, or before serving notice of the appeal, such request shall be permitted and the appeal shall be dismissed without prejudice by the hearing examiner, and the filing fee shall be refunded.
(21)
Standard of Review. The hearing examiner may affirm the decision of the designated official or the adequacy of the environmental impact statement, or remand the case for further information; or the hearing examiner may reverse the decision if the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are:
(a)
In violation of constitutional provisions as applied; or
(b)
The decision is outside the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the city; or
(c)
The designated official has engaged in unlawful procedure or decision-making process, or has failed to follow a prescribed procedure; or
(d)
In regard to challenges to the appropriateness of the issuance of a DNS clearly erroneous in view of the public policy of the Act (SEPA); or
(e)
In regard to challenges to the adequacy of an EIS shown to be inadequate employing the "rule of reason."
(22)
Evidence – Burden of Proof. In each particular proceeding, the appellant shall have the burden of proof, and the determination of the designated official shall be presumed prima facie correct and shall be afforded substantial weight. Appeals shall be limited to the records of the designated official.
(23)
Judicial Appeal.
(a)
Any available administrative appeal provided under this section must be utilized by an agency or aggrieved person prior to initiating judicial review of any SEPA action, omission, or determination made or taken under this chapter.
(b)
A judicial appeal of any SEPA action, omission, or determination made or taken under this chapter must be filed within the time limitations established by any statute or ordinance for appeal of the underlying governmental action.
(c)
The city shall give official notice of the date and place for commencing a judicial appeal, in accordance with WAC 197-11-680(5), where there is a statute or ordinance establishing a time limit for commencing judicial appeal.
(R)
Agency Compliance.
(1)
Purpose. This section contains rules for agency compliance with SEPA, including rules for charging fees under the SEPA process, designating categorical exemptions that do not apply within critical areas, listing agencies with environmental expertise, selecting the lead agency, and applying these rules to current agency activities.
(2)
Fees. The city shall require the following fees for its activities in accordance with the provisions of this UDC:
(a)
Threshold Determination. For every environmental checklist the city will review when it is lead agency, the city shall collect a fee as required by the city fee resolution from the proponent of the proposal prior to undertaking the threshold determination. The time periods provided by this chapter for making a threshold determination shall not begin to run until payment of the fee.
(b)
Environmental Impact Statement.
(i)
When the city is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an EIS and the designated official determines that the EIS shall be prepared by employees of the city, the city may charge and collect a reasonable fee as required by the city fee resolution from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the city in preparing the EIS. The designated official shall advise the applicant(s) of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs.
(ii)
The designated official may determine that the city will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, for activities initiated by some persons or entity other than the city and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. The city may require the applicant to post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. Such consultants shall be selected by the city after a call for proposals.
(c)
Cost of Notice. The city may collect from the applicant the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this chapter relating to the applicant's proposal.
(d)
Performance Fee. The city shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency.
(Ord. 740 § 1 (Exh. A), 2007; Ord. 827 § 20, 2012; Ord. 862 §§ 50, 51, 2013; Ord. 905 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 937 § 24 (Exh. W), 2017; Ord. 994 § 6, 2020; Ord. 1019 § 1, 2022)