The purpose of this article is to provide for
a Zoning Board of Appeals, made up of local citizens, to assist in
the equitable administration of this chapter.
[Amended 10-19-1999 by L.L. No. 26-1999]
The jurisdiction of the Zoning Board of Appeals
shall be limited as follows:
A. Matters within jurisdiction of the Board. The Board
of Appeals shall have jurisdiction to hear and decide the following:
(1)
Appeals from the Building Inspector. Applications
brought by aggrieved persons from interpretations of provisions of
this chapter made by the Building Inspector or for review of other
orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made by him pursuant
to this chapter.
(2)
Appeals from the Architectural Review Board. Applications brought by an applicant before the Architectural Review Board or the owner of the property which is the subject of that application, for the reversal of all or part of a determination made by the Review Board, but only with respect to a Review Board decision involving a residence in a designated historic landmark or historic district pursuant to the Review Board's jurisdiction under §§ 255-8-30D or E of this chapter, and only on the grounds set forth in §
255-8-50A(2) of this chapter (unreasonable economic hardship). The Zoning Board is not authorized to hear applications to reverse decisions of the Review Board on any other matters or to reverse Review Board decisions on any matter (including decisions with respect to residences in an historic landmark or an historic district) on any grounds other than unreasonable economic hardship. Such Architectural Review Board decisions are final agency action, are not within the jurisdiction of the Zoning Board of Appeals and are subject to judicial review if otherwise appropriate.
[Amended 6-2-2000 by L.L. No. 6-2000]
(3)
Interpretations. Applications brought directly
to the Board of Appeals by any local agency for interpretations of
provisions of this chapter.
(4)
Special permits. Applications brought by persons for special permits, the administration of which is delegated to the Board of Appeals pursuant to Article
V hereof.
(5)
Variances. Applications brought by persons for
one or more use variances or area variances.
(6)
Personal wireless service facility tiers. If
the Planning Director categorizes an application as Tier Two or Tier
Three and the applicant believes that a lower tier applies, the applicant
may appeal the categorization to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
[Added 11-1-2002 by L.L. No. 34-2002]
(7)
Revocation of a certificate of occupancy. Applications
brought by the Building Inspector involving the revocation of a certificate
of occupancy.
[Added 10-7-2005 by L.L. No. 32-2005]
B. Scope of review. For the purposes of this section, "provision" shall include but not be limited to the location of district boundaries on any Use District Map contained in Article
XI hereof; "interpretation" shall include but not be limited to a determination as to:
(1)
Whether a change or alteration involving a nonconforming
building, structure or lot renders the same more or less nonconforming,
or constitutes an expansion thereof.
(2)
Whether a change, activity or alteration involving
a nonconforming use renders the same more or less nonconforming, or
constitutes an expansion thereof.
(3)
Whether an alteration in a special permit use
constitutes a substantial expansion thereof, necessitating issuance
of a special permit, and whether an alteration of any other structure
or use is a substantial expansion as defined herein.
(4)
Whether a particular use is a permitted or prohibited
use under the terms of this chapter in a particular district.
(5)
The meaning of one or more words of the text
of this chapter.
C. Limitation. The Board of Appeals shall be wholly without authority to vary, waive or modify to any extent any provision of this chapter unless such variance, waiver, or modification constitutes an area variance or use variance, as defined herein. The Board of Appeals shall specifically be without power to vary, waive or modify any definitional or procedural provision of this chapter, whether found in Article
I or Article
VIII or elsewhere, although the Board may, if necessary, interpret the provisions of any part of the chapter as a part of its other authorized activities.
An application may be made to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a determination that persons occupying a dwelling unit do or do not constitute a family, as that term is defined in this chapter. Such an application shall be entertained by the Board only on appeal from an order, requirement, decision or determination made by the Building Inspector; the Board's jurisdiction in this respect shall be appellate only and shall lie under Subsection A of §
255-8-30 hereof.
[Added 11-7-2003 by L.L. No. 37-2003]
The Zoning Board of Appeals shall have jurisdiction to determine appeals of aggrieved persons concerning matters set forth in Chapter
102, Building Construction, §
102-29 Grievance; appeals, relating to interpretations and variances from the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as the same may be amended from time to time.
Applications to the Board of Appeals shall be made in writing only, on the forms prescribed by the Board for the same, and shall set forth fully the facts and circumstances involved in the application. Every such application shall refer to the specific provision(s) of this chapter involved and, as the case may be, shall set forth the interpretation that is claimed, the use for which a special permit is sought or the details of the variance applied for and the grounds on which it is claimed that the same should be granted. The required fee established by the Town Board pursuant to §
255-9-26 shall accompany the application. Upon receipt of any application which it finds to be complete and in compliance herewith, the Board of Appeals shall follow the procedure set forth in Article
IX hereof for the processing of applications.
The following standards and criteria shall govern
determinations made by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
A. Appeals and interpretations.
[Amended 10-19-1999 by L.L. No. 26-1999]
(1)
Appeals from the Building Inspector and interpretations of provisions of this chapter. In deciding an appeal from an interpretation of a provision of this chapter made by the Building Inspector, or an appeal from any other order, requirement, decision or determination made by him, the Board of Appeals shall keep in mind the findings, purposes and goals of the Town's Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of this chapter as set forth in Article
I and other parts thereof, as well as the findings of any local law enacting or amending the language at issue. The Board shall follow any specific standards or limitations set forth in this chapter which govern the question and shall give great weight to the above factors as indicative of legislative purpose and intent. Appeals relating to §
255-8-32 hereof (occupancy of a dwelling unit by a family) shall be governed by the provisions of Subsection
F below.
(2)
Appeals from the Architectural Review Board.
The Board of Appeals shall not reverse, in whole or part, a decision
of the Architectural Review Board, unless the Board of Appeals shall
find and fully set forth in its determination that the Review Board's
decision would cause the applicant or the owner of the property an
unreasonable economic hardship if left undisturbed.
[Amended 6-2-2000 by L.L. No. 6-2000]
(3)
In making any determination under this chapter, among other
factors to be considered as outlined in this chapter, the Zoning Board
of Appeals shall, when applicable, consider the location and metes
and bounds of existing scenic, agricultural, and conservation easements
and purchases of development rights agreements in, upon, or adjacent
to the premises under review, to which the Town of East Hampton, a
conservation organization or a homeowners' association is a grantee
or a party, and the impact of the proposed action upon the benefits
conferred by such easements and/or development rights.
[Added 6-20-2019 by L.L.
No. 28-2019]
B. Special permits. In deciding whether to grant a special permit the administration of which has been given to it by Article
V of this chapter, the Board of Appeals shall apply the general standards and specific standards and safeguards, if any, set forth in Article
V.
C. Use variances. The Board of Appeals shall not grant
any use variance, so as to allow a use of land in a manner or for
a purpose which is otherwise not allowed or is prohibited by the use
tables contained in this chapter, unless the Board shall find
and fully set forth in its determination that the applicant has shown
unnecessary hardship, which shall mean that:
(1)
Under the use regulations contained in this
chapter, the applicant cannot realize a reasonable economic return
from the property, lot or land in question, under any of the uses
permitted by this chapter, and that such lack of reasonable return
is substantial and has been established by competent financial evidence.
(2)
Notwithstanding anything which may be to the contrary in § 267-b
of the New York Town Law or in any other provision of the Town Law
relating to Zoning Boards of Appeals, the applicant shall have the
burden of showing that the benefit accruing to him from grant of the
requested variance outweighs any harm which will be caused to the
neighborhood or the Town, and that the variance requested is the minimum
variance needed to alleviate his difficulty while safeguarding the
character of the neighborhood and the general welfare of the Town.
In making this determination, among other factors outlined in this
chapter, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider the location and
metes and bounds of existing scenic, agricultural, and conservation
easements and purchases of development rights agreements in, upon,
or adjacent to the premises under review, to which the Town of East
Hampton, a conservation organization or a homeowners' association
is a grantee or a party, and the impact of the proposed variance(s)
upon the benefits conferred by such easements and/or development rights.
[Amended 6-20-2019 by L.L. No. 28-2019]
(3)
The use variance to be granted will not alter
the essential character of the neighborhood.
(4)
The hardship relating to the property has not
been self-created.
(5)
The use variance to be granted is the minimum
variance necessary and adequate to alleviate the unnecessary hardship
shown by the applicant, while at the same time preserving and protecting
the character of the neighborhood and the general health, safety and
welfare of the Town as a whole.
D. Area variances. The following provisions shall govern
applications for area variances:
[Amended 5-15-1998 by L.L. No. 20-1998]
(1)
The Board of Appeals shall not grant any area
variance, waiving strict application of the area or dimensional requirements
of this chapter, unless the Board shall find and fully set forth in
its determination that:
(a)
The benefit to the applicant from grant of the
area variance outweighs any detriment which grant of the variance
will cause to the general health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood
or the Town as a whole; and
(b)
The area variance to be granted is the minimum
variance necessary and adequate to alleviate the difficulty causing
the applicant to request an area variance, while at the same time
preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the
general health, safety and welfare of the Town as a whole.
(2)
Notwithstanding anything which may be to the
contrary in § 267-b of the New York Town Law or in any other
provision of the Town Law relating to Zoning Boards of Appeals, the
applicant shall have the burden of showing that the benefit accruing
to him from grant of the requested variance outweighs any harm which
will be caused to the neighborhood or the Town, and that the variance
requested is the minimum variance needed to alleviate his difficulty
while safeguarding the character of the neighborhood and the general
welfare of the Town.
(3)
In deciding whether to grant an area variance,
the Board shall consider the following factors:
(a)
Whether the grant of the variance will cause
an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or will
create a detriment to nearby properties;
(b)
Whether the benefit sought by the applicant
can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue,
other than an area variance;
(c)
Whether the requested area variance is substantial;
(d)
Whether the grant of the variance will have
an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions
in the neighborhood or in the affected area of the Town; and
(e)
Whether the difficulty causing the applicant
to request an area variance was self-created, which consideration
shall be relevant to the determination of the Board but shall not
necessarily preclude the grant of the variance.
F. Occupancy by family.
(1)
A group of more than four unrelated persons shall be deemed to constitute a single-family for the purpose of occupying a dwelling unit only if the group is the functional equivalent of either of the two entities described in Subsection
A of the definition of "family," found at §
255-1-20 of this chapter. The Board of Appeals shall determine that a group of more than four unrelated persons is a family only if it finds that:
(a)
The group is one which in size, function and
structure resembles a traditional family unit.
(b)
The group will live and cook together as a single
housekeeping unit.
(c)
The group is of a permanent nature and is neither
a framework for transient or seasonal living nor merely an association
or relationship which is transient or seasonal in nature.
(d)
All other requirements of this chapter regarding
the use and occupancy of the dwelling unit in which the group resides
will be met.
(2)
Any determination under this subsection that
a particular group of persons constitutes a family shall constitute
a determination as to the status of that particular group only and
shall not be interpreted as authorizing any other occupancy, use or
activity.
G. The revocation of a certificate of occupancy. The
Board of Appeals shall find that a certificate of occupancy was properly
revoked by the Building Inspector only if the Board finds and fully
sets forth in its determination that:
[Added 10-7-2005 by L.L. No. 32-2005]
(1)
There has been any false statement or misrepresentation
as to a material fact in the application, plans or specifications
upon which the building permit was issued;
(2)
There has been any false statement or misrepresentation
as to a material fact in the application for a certificate of occupancy;
(3)
The certificate of occupancy was issued in error;
or
(4)
The certificate of occupancy was issued in conflict
with the applicable law.
[Amended 1-16-1997 by L.L. No. 2-1997]
Notwithstanding any other provision of this
chapter or of the New York Town Law as it relates to Zoning Boards
of Appeals and their power to grant variances, the authority of the
Board of Appeals to grant variances shall be limited as provided in
this section.
A. Expansion of nonconforming buildings ("50% cap").
Nonconforming buildings should not be capable of unlimited enlargement
in a manner which continues to transgress the applicable setbacks,
even through the grant of variances by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
To that end, the following rules shall limit the authority of the
Zoning Board of Appeals:
(1)
The Board of Appeals shall have no power to grant a variance or variances which would increase the gross floor area of the nonconforming portion of a nonconforming building by more than 50%. For the purposes of this subsection, the "gross floor area of the nonconforming portion of a nonconforming building" shall be the cumulative gross floor area of any part or parts of a building which are located within a required yard, natural resources, pyramid law or other setback. Furthermore, in computing the "gross floor area of the nonconforming portion of a nonconforming building," the figure used shall be that which existed on the date the building first became nonconforming as to any Town setback requirement. See also §
255-1-42 hereof.
(2)
Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection
A(1), the Board of Appeals shall be authorized to grant a variance or variances which would increase the gross floor area of a nonconforming building in the following instances:
(a)
If the variance(s) would increase the gross
floor area of the nonconforming portion of a nonconforming building
by no more than 300 square feet; or
(b)
If the variance(s) would increase the gross
floor area of the building as a whole to no more than 1,200 square
feet.
B. Small lots. The intended beneficial results of upgraded zoning requirements in established neighborhoods and other areas is sometimes defeated by continued creation of nonconforming lots in such areas by variance. Such haphazard creation of nonconforming lots (as opposed to creation of small lots as part of a controlled overall Town housing strategy) is hereby found to be disruptive of the goals of sound planning and land use, injurious to the health, safety and general welfare of the community and against public policy. Therefore, in deciding whether to grant a requested variance for the division of a residentially zoned lot into two or more nonconforming lots, one or more of which would not contain an existing residence, the Board of Appeals shall confine its deliberations to the standards set forth in §
255-8-50D hereof and shall not be compelled to grant any such variance solely because of the size of adjacent lots, the average size of lots in the neighborhood or any other similar narrow consideration.
D. Urban renewal maps. The Board of Appeals may approve a change in the lot line configuration of or the division, diminishment or expansion of lots located in an urban renewal map subject to and conditioned upon the Town Board's determination to amend the Urban Renewal Plan to reflect such reconfigurations, division, diminishment or expansion but shall not issue variances authorizing or resulting in changes to streets, access, frontage, road improvement units or any other specific feature or requirements of any such plan, or of Chapter
232.
[Amended 9-20-2005 by L.L. No. 29-2005]
[Added 4-13-2007 by L.L. No. 14-2007]
A. Variances from requirements of Flood Hazard Overlay District. A variance from the Town's Flood Hazard Overlay District requirements shall be deemed an area variance. Nevertheless, pursuant to Article 36 of the Environmental Conservation Law and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in §
255-8-50D hereof or in § 267-b of the Town Law or any other provision of the Town Law relating to the standards for the granting of area variances, the review of variances from the requirements of said overlay district shall be governed by the following provisions:
(1)
The Board of Appeals shall not grant any variance from the requirements of the Flood Hazard Overlay District (found at §
255-3-40 et seq. hereof) unless the Board shall find and fully set forth in its determination that the applicant has shown exceptional hardship, which shall mean that:
(a)
The applicant cannot reasonably comply with
the requirement from which a variance is sought; and
(b)
Grant of the variance will not result in an
undue threat to human health or safety, will not result in an undue
risk of damage to public or private property, will not increase flood
heights, and will not cause extraordinary public expense.
(2)
The applicant shall have the burden of establishing
the existence of exceptional hardship and shall show that, in view
of the flood hazard, the variance sought is the minimum variance necessary
to afford him relief. In deciding whether to grant a variance under
this subsection, the Board shall consider the following factors:
(a)
The degree of difficulty which the applicant
would have in complying with the requirement;
(b)
The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate
of rise, and sediment transport of floodwaters at the applicant's
property, and the effects of wave action, if applicable;
(c)
The extent of the danger to life and property
due to flooding or flood-caused erosion of the applicant's land;
(d)
The susceptibility of any proposed structure
or use, or its contents, to flood damage and the effects of such damage
on the applicant;
(e)
The importance of the benefits provided to the
community by the applicant's proposed structure or use;
(f)
The applicant's need for a waterfront location,
where applicable;
(g)
The availability of alternative locations for
the proposed structure or use which are not as subject to flooding
or erosion damage;
(h)
The compatibility of the proposed structure
or use with existing and anticipated development in its vicinity;
(i)
The relationship of the proposed structure or
use to the Town's Comprehensive Plan and floodplain management program
for the area;
(j)
The safety of vehicular access to the applicant's
property in times of flood;
(k)
The cost of governmental services associated
with flooding of the applicant's property, such as search and rescue
operations, post-storm clean-up, and restoration of public facilities
and utilities; and
(l)
The dangers associated with search and rescue
operations involving the applicant's property during periods of flooding.
(3)
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a variance may be granted for the repair or rehabilitation of an historic structure, as defined herein, if the requirements of Subsection
A(1)(b) above are met and the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as an historic structure.
B. Limitation on variances from requirements of Coastal Erosion Overlay District. Any variance from the prohibition of erosion control structures in certain areas of the Town, as set forth in §
255-3-85B hereof, shall be deemed an area variance and subject to the standards set forth in §
255-8-50 hereof. Nevertheless, pursuant to Article 34 of the Environmental Conservation Law and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in §
255-8-50 hereof or in § 267-b of the Town Law or any other provision of the Town Law relating to the standards for grant of area variances, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall not grant a variance to allow the construction, placement, installation, maintenance, repair, replacement, or alteration of an erosion control structure which extends perpendicular to the shoreline (such as a groin or jetty), unless such structure is necessary to ensure the safe navigability of a boat channel.
No area variance application which involves
the subdivision of land, where one or more of the lots to be created
does not comply with the minimum dimensional requirements of this
chapter, shall be deemed complete unless application for approval
of such subdivision shall have been made to the Planning Board and
proof of the receipt of such application forwarded to the Zoning Board
of Appeals. In any such application, the Board of Appeals shall solicit
a written recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the grant
of the requested variance or variances, as required by § 277,
Subdivision 6, of the Town Law.
As more particularly set forth in the following
sections, the Board of Appeals may follow alternate review procedures
with respect to certain types of applications and approvals over which
it has been given jurisdiction hereunder.
[Added 3-1-2012 by L.L. No. 5-2012]
Time for obtaining a building permit. A determination from the
Zoning Board of Appeals shall be valid for a period of three years
from the date on which the Board certifies that all conditions of
the determination have been met. The Zoning Board of Appeals may by
resolution extend the determination for additional one-year periods.
No waiver of notice. The preceding sections shall not be deemed to waive the requirements of Article
IX of this chapter regarding publishing, sign posting or other required notice for variance, special permit or other applications which may be made to the Board of Appeals. Notices in the official newspaper for variances or permits of the type listed in these sections shall state that the application is of a type for which a public hearing may be waived if no written objections are received within the period prescribed in the notice.
[Amended 9-4-1998 by L.L. No. 30-1998]
It shall be a violation of this chapter, subject to the provisions of Article
X hereof for any person to do any of the following:
A. Failure to obtain variance. To undertake or commence
a use or activity which does not comply with one or more physical,
dimensional or use requirements of this chapter without having first
obtained a variance of those requirements from the Zoning Board of
Appeals.
B. Failure to obtain special permit. To undertake or
commence a use or activity for which this chapter requires the issuance
of a special permit by the Board of Appeals without having first obtained
said special permit.
C. Violation of conditions of a grant of variance. To
violate or fail to comply with a condition or requirement of any variance
granted by the Board of Appeals pursuant to this article.
D. Violation of conditions of special permit. To violate
or fail to comply with a condition or requirement of a special permit
issued by the Board of Appeals.
|
In addition, for a period of three years from the date of filing of a determination of the Board of Appeals which grants one or more variances or issues a special permit, the Board shall retain jurisdiction and shall have during such period the right to modify, suspend or revoke its determination, in accordance with the standards and procedures for such continuing jurisdiction set forth in § 255-9-25 of this chapter. See also § 255-5-100 hereof.
|