The Board of Trustees hereby finds that excessive
uniformity or similarity, dissimilarity or inappropriateness or poor
quality of design of the exterior appearance of buildings or structures
in the Village, in relation to the prevailing appearance of residential
buildings in the vicinity thereof, would adversely affect the desirability
of the immediate area and neighboring areas for residential purposes;
discourage the most appropriate use of land throughout the Village;
impair the benefits of occupancy of existing property, impair the
stability and value of both improved and unimproved real property
and contribute to the diminution of the taxable value of real property
in such areas and their ability to support municipal services provided
therefor. It is the purpose of this chapter to prevent these and other
potentially harmful effects resulting from the unattractive exterior
appearance of buildings and other structures erected or altered, and
thus to promote the public health, safety and welfare, to conserve
the value of buildings, to encourage the most appropriate use of land
and to improve the physical and visual appearance of the Village.
[Amended 11-16-2010 by L.L. No. 5-2010]
A. There is hereby created a Design Review Board which
shall consist of at least five members, and one alternate member,
who shall serve without compensation. Whenever possible, at least
one or more members of the Board shall be specially qualified by reason
of training or experience in art, architecture, landscape architecture,
community planning, land development, real estate or other relevant
business or profession to judge the effects of a proposed building
or structure or alteration thereof upon the desirability, property
value and development of surrounding areas. The Design Review Board
is also hereby authorized to retain, as needed, under arrangements
subject to the approval of the Board of Trustees, the services of
an architect, who need not be a resident of the Incorporated Village
of Plandome Manor and who shall be qualified by reason of training
and experience to assist the Design Review Board in carrying out the
provisions of this chapter.
B. The members, and alternate members, of such Board
shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the approval of the Board of
Trustees, and the Chairman thereof shall be designated by the Mayor.
Of the members first appointed, one shall hold office for the term
of one year, two for the term of two years and two for the term of
three years, from and after their respective appointments. Their successors
shall be appointed for a term of three years, from and after the expiration
of the terms of their predecessors in office. If a vacancy shall occur
otherwise than by expiration of term, it shall be filled by the Mayor
for the unexpired term. The Board of Trustees shall have the power
to remove any member of the Design Review Board for cause and after
public hearing. The Mayor shall designate a Secretary of the Board,
who need not be a member of the Board and who shall serve at the pleasure
of the Mayor.
C. The alternate
member shall substitute for a member in the event such member is absent
or otherwise unable to serve. The alternate member shall be appointed
for a term of one year.
A majority of the appointed members of the Board,
but not fewer than three members, shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business as provided by § 41 of the General
Construction Law.
In examining plans or proposals, the Design Review Board shall disapprove or recommend disapproval as set forth in §
20-5A of any installation or construction which would cause or contribute to one or more of the harmful effects set forth in §
20-1 of this chapter by reason of:
A. Excessive similarity of design in relation to any
other structure existing in the vicinity or for which a permit has
been issued or to any other structure included in the same permit
application, in respect to one or more of the following features of
exterior design and appearance:
(1) Apparently identical facade.
(2) Substantially identical size and arrangement of either
doors, windows, porticos or other openings or breaks in the facade,
including reverse arrangement.
(3) Other significant identical features such as, but not limited to, construction material, roofline and height or other design elements, provided that a finding of excessive similarity of design shall include not only that such similarity exists, but further that it is of such nature as to produce one or more of the harmful effects set forth in §
20-1 of this chapter.
B. Excessive dissimilarity of design or inappropriateness of design or of site plan in relation to any other structure existing in the vicinity or for which a permit has been issued or to any other structure included in the same permit application, or inappropriateness or excessive dissimilarity of design in relation to the characteristics of residential building design generally prevailing in the Village in respect to features of exterior design or appearance, provided that a finding of excessive dissimilarity or inappropriateness of design shall include not only that such dissimilarity or inappropriateness exists, but further that it is of such nature as to produce one or more of the harmful effects set forth in §
20-1.
C. The poor quality of building and overall site design
in respect to one or more of the following features: the relationship
to and character of the adjacent neighborhood; consideration of architectural
style, bulk, dimensions, materials and location on the site and in
relation to development on adjoining properties and the natural terrain
and vegetation.
The Board shall restrict its consideration to
a reasonable and professional review of the proposal and plans, leaving
full responsibility for the design and development to the applicant.
The Board shall not design or assist in the design of any buildings
or structures submitted for approval. However, in disapproving any
application for a building permit, the Design Review Board may suggest
modifications in the design of the building or alteration or any other
requirements which may or may not be adequate to render the same acceptable
under the provisions of this chapter.
The Building Inspector shall not issue any building
permit for which the application has been disapproved by the Design
Review Board as provided above. The Design Review Board shall render
its determination on any application which shall properly come before
it on or before the 62nd day following the date of the closing of
the hearing. The Building Inspector shall issue the permit applied
for, once approved by the Design Review Board, provided the application
conforms to the provisions of all other applicable laws.
Within one year of the date of approval by the
Design Review Board of any such building plans and building designs,
the Building Inspector shall, on application conforming to the provisions
of all other applicable laws, issue permits for buildings conforming
to such approved building plans and building designs, including any
conditions attached to such approval, without referring the application
therefor to the Design Review Board. Furthermore, this approval will
become void six months after permit issuance if construction relating
to this application has not begun. The applicant may apply to the
Building Inspector for an extension.
[Amended 6-20-2006 by L.L. No. 4-2006]
Any person aggrieved by any action of the Design
Review Board may appeal to the Board of Trustees of the Village. The
Board of Trustees may reverse, modify or affirm the action of the
Design Review Board. Said appeal shall be filed with the Village Clerk
within 45 days of the applicant's receipt of either a Design Review
Board decision or transcript of the hearing containing the decision.
Said appeal shall be heard by the Board of Trustees within 90 days
of receipt of the appeal by the Village Clerk. The standard for any
such appeal shall not be de novo. Rather, the standard shall be the
reasonableness and/or arbitrariness and capriciousness of the Design
Review Board's decision.