Where the Board finds that practical difficulty or extraordinary hardship, because of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of the specific parcel or because of unusual topographic conditions or other unusual physical condition of the specific parcel, may result from strict compliance with these regulations, it may grant a variance from the regulations in the specific case so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest is secured, provided that such variation will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the Master Plan or these regulations. In granting a variance, the Board may require such conditions as will, in its judgment, secure substantially the objectives of the subdivision regulations.[1]
[1]
Editor's Note: Original § 49-25, Large scale development, and § 49-26, Public hearing, which immediately followed this section, were repealed 10-16-1990 by L.L. No. 2-1990.