Every purchase to be made must be initially reviewed to determine
whether it is a purchase contract or a public works contract. Once
that determination is made, a good-faith effort will be made to determine
whether it is known or can reasonably be expected that the aggregate
amount to be spent on the item of supply or service is not subject
to competitive bidding, taking into account past purchases and the
aggregate amount to be spent in a year.
A. The following items are not subject to competitive bidding pursuant
to § 103 of the General Municipal Law: purchase contracts
under $20,000 and public works under $35,000; emergency purchases;
certain municipal hospital purchases; goods purchased from agencies
for the blind or severely handicapped; goods purchased from correctional
institutions; purchases under state and county contracts; and surplus
and secondhand purchases from another governmental entity.
B. The decision that a purchase is not subject to competitive bidding
will be documented in writing by the individual making the purchase.
This documentation may include written or verbal quotes from vendors,
a memo from the purchaser indicating how the decision was arrived
at, a copy of the contract indicating the source which makes the item
or service exempt, a memo from the purchaser detailing the circumstance
which led to an emergency purchase, or any other written documentation
that is appropriate.
All goods and services will be secured by use of written requests for proposals, written quotations, verbal quotations, or any other method that assures that goods will be purchased at the lowest price and that favoritism will be avoided, except in the following circumstances: purchase contracts over $20,000 and public works contracts over $35,000; goods purchased from agencies for the blind or severely handicapped pursuant to § 175-b of the State Finance Law; goods purchased from correctional institutions pursuant to § 186 of the Correction Law; purchases under state contracts pursuant to § 104 of the General Municipal Law; purchases under county contracts pursuant to § 103, Subdivision 3, of the General Municipal Law; or purchases pursuant to §
A250-6 of this policy.
Documentation and an explanation is required whenever a contract
is awarded to other than the lowest responsible offeror. This documentation
will include an explanation of how the award will achieve savings
or how the offeror was not responsible. A determination that the offeror
is not responsible shall be made by the purchaser and may not be challenged
under any circumstances.
Pursuant to General Municipal Law § 104-b, Subdivision
2f, the procurement policy may contain circumstances when, or types
of procurements for which, the sole discretion of the governing body,
the solicitation of alternative proposals or quotations will not be
in the best interest of the municipality. In the following circumstances
it may not be in the best interests of the Village of Skaneateles
to solicit quotations or document the basis for not accepting the
lowest bid:
A. Professional services or services requiring special or technical
skill, training or expertise. The individual or company must be chosen
based on accountability, reliability, responsibility, skill, education
and training, judgment, integrity, and moral worth. These qualifications
are not necessarily found in the individual or company that offers
the lowest price and the nature of these services are such that they
do not readily lend themselves to competitive procurement procedures.
(1) In determining whether a service fits into this category, the Board
of Trustees shall take into consideration the following guidelines:
(a)
Whether the services are subject to state licensing or testing
requirements;
(b)
Whether substantial formal education or training is a necessary
prerequisite to the performance of the services; and
(c)
Whether the services require a personal relationship between
the individual and municipal officials.
(2) Professional or technical services shall include but not be limited
to the following: services of an attorney; services of a physician;
technical services of an engineer engaged to prepare plans, maps and
estimates; securing insurance coverage and/or services of an insurance
broker; services of a certified public accountant; investment management
services; printing services involving extensive writing, editing or
art work; management of municipality-owned property or projects; and
computer software or programming services for customized programs,
or services involved in substantial modification and customizing of
prepackaged software.
B. Emergency purchases pursuant to § 103, Subdivision 4, of
the General Municipal Law. Due to the nature of this exception, these
goods or services must be purchased immediately and a delay in order
to seek alternate proposals may threaten the life, health, safety
or welfare of the residents. This section does not preclude alternate
proposals if time permits.
C. Purchases of surplus and secondhand goods from any source. If alternate
proposals are required, the Village is precluded from purchasing surplus
and secondhand goods at auctions or through specific advertised sources
where the best prices are usually obtained. It is also difficult to
try to compare prices of used goods and lower prices may indicate
an older product.
D. Goods or services under $1,000. The time and documentation required
to purchase through this policy may be more costly than the item itself
and would therefore not be in the best interests of the taxpayer.
In addition, it is not likely that such de minimis contracts would
be awarded based on favoritism.
This revised policy shall go into effect immediately and will
be reviewed annually.