[Ord. No. 1528, 9-26-2022]
(a) Design goals. Applicants shall adhere to a holistic design process incorporating the goals listed below. The objective is to achieve post-development hydrologic conditions that are consistent with the predevelopment ground cover assumption for new development [Refer to §
913.15(b).] and improve the runoff conditions for redevelopment. [Refer to §
913.14(c)(3).] The design goals are:
(1)
Minimize the volume of runoff that must be collected, conveyed,
treated and released by stormwater management facilities;
(2)
Maintain the natural infiltration process and rate, and infiltrate
runoff at its source when appropriate;
(3)
Remove and/or treat pollutants at the source or during conveyance;
(4)
Provide for peak flow attenuation, as needed; and
(5)
Attenuate runoff to protect the tributaries of the receiving
stream.
(b) General principles. The following general principles apply to all applicable activities pursuant to §
913.03:
(1)
Incorporate conservation design practices to minimize the amount
of stormwater generated on a site, encourage the disconnection of
impervious land cover, and maximize the use of pervious areas for
stormwater treatment and on-site rainfall infiltration.
(2)
Infiltration of surface water runoff at its source is to be a mechanism for stormwater management based on hydrologic soil group (or infiltration testing). Infiltration practices include, but are not limited to, those referenced in §
913.16(b)(1) and as outlined in the publications listed in §
913.16. Infiltration practices shall adhere to the following criteria:
A.
In choosing methods of infiltration, preference shall be given
to a combination of surface and subsurface infiltration methods.
B.
Applicants shall first consider minimum disturbance/minimum
maintenance techniques combined with site grading that distributes
runoff to reduce concentration. Next, applicants shall consider depression
areas combined with subsurface infiltration practices followed by
other subsurface measures, including, but not limited to, porous paving
and perforated pipe storage.
C.
The use of multiple infiltration features and facilities that
provide for the following is encouraged:
1.
Discourage concentration of flows;
2.
Encourage disconnection of flows;
3.
Infiltrate as close to the source of runoff as possible; and
D.
Where high water tables, subsurface contamination, slope stability concerns, or other site constraints preclude achieving the required infiltration volume, additional conservation design practices and alternative stormwater management practices should be implemented to reduce to the maximum extent practicable the total volume of stormwater released to streams. The applicant shall follow the stormwater runoff hierarchy of §
913.16(a)(1).
E.
Infiltration areas should be designed to maintain a broad and
even infiltration pattern which existed prior to development. Such
facilities should use the natural topography and vegetation in order
to blend in with the site. Infiltration designs which do not provide
this may be used if the applicant demonstrates to the Town's
satisfaction that alternative approaches would be more effective and
more harmonious with their existing environment and as easily maintained.
F.
Aboveground stormwater infiltration facilities should be as
shallow as possible while still achieving the requirements of this
article.
(3)
Water quality improvement shall be achieved in conjunction with
or as part of infiltration practices. Water quality improvements shall
also be provided for drainage areas not otherwise addressed by infiltration
practices either at the source of runoff and/or during conveyance
away from the source of runoff.
(4)
To reduce the need for large retention and/or detention basins
designed to satisfy the peak flow attenuation and extended detention
requirements, other innovative stormwater management practices located
close to the source of runoff generation shall be considered, including
a combination of practices (e.g., rooftop storage, open vegetated
channels, bioretention, pervious pavement systems and infiltration
trenches).
(5)
When designing stormwater management facilities to satisfy the peak flow attenuation and extended detention requirements [Refer to §
913.14(c)(2)B.], the effect of structural and nonstructural stormwater management practices implemented as part of the overall site design may be taken into consideration when calculating total storage volume and release rates.
(6)
Site hydrology and natural infiltration patterns shall guide
site design, construction, and vegetation decisions. All channels,
drainageways, swales, natural streams and other surface water concentrations
shall be considered and, where possible, incorporated into design
decisions.
(c) Minimum performance criteria.
(1)
The following minimum performance standards shall apply to all applicable activities, whether they are new development or redevelopment, pursuant to §
913.03(a):
A.
Water quality treatment of stormwater runoff shall be provided
for all discharges prior to release to a receiving water body. If
a stormwater management practice does not provide water quality treatment,
then water quality best management practices shall be utilized prior
to the runoff entering the stormwater management practice.
B.
Water quality management shall be provided through the use of
structural and/or nonstructural stormwater management practices. Water
quality stormwater management practices shall be designed to reduce
or eliminate solids, sediment, nutrients, and other potential pollutants
from the site. It is presumed that a stormwater management practice
complies with this requirement if it is:
1.
Designed according to the specific performance criteria outlined in §
913.08(b);
2.
Constructed in accordance with all permits and approved plans
and specifications; and
3.
Maintained per an approved operation and maintenance plan or
agreement or, in lieu of that, in accordance with customary practices.
C.
Stormwater discharges from land uses or activities with higher potential for pollutant loadings (hotspots) may require the use of specific structural stormwater management practices and pollution prevention practices. In addition, stormwater from a hotspot land use shall be provided with proper pretreatment prior to infiltration. For the purpose of this article, the sites/facilities listed in §
913.14(c)(1)D below are considered hotspots.
D.
Certain industrial sites may be required to prepare and implement
a stormwater pollution prevention plan and file notice of intent as
required under the provisions of the EPA industrial stormwater NPDES
permit requirements. Other industrial sites storing significant quantities
of chemicals/wastes should also prepare a prevention plan. Sites that
are required by the EPA to prepare a plan include, but are not limited
to:
1.
Vehicle salvage yards and recycling facilities;
2.
Vehicle and equipment cleaning facilities;
3.
Fleet storage areas for buses, trucks, etc.;
4.
Marinas (service and maintenance);
5.
Facilities that generate or store hazardous materials.
E.
Conveyance structures/channels shall be designed and adequately
sized so as to protect the properties receiving runoff from impacts
of flooding and erosion. Where necessary, and to the maximum extent
permitted under the Municipalities Planning Code and Act 167, or any amendments thereto, a drainage easement
from adjoining properties shall be obtained to ensure the drainageway
and the property and shall also establish the operation and maintenance
requirements for the drainageway.
F.
All stormwater management practices shall have an operation and maintenance plan pursuant to §
913.19(c) of this article, and if to be privately owned, an enforceable operation and maintenance agreement per §
913.19(d) of this article to ensure the system functions as designed and to provide remedies for system failure. A sample agreement may be found in Appendix C of this article.
G.
Stormwater runoff generated from development and discharged
directly into a jurisdictional wetland or waters of the United States
and their adjacent wetlands shall be treated by an approved stormwater
management practice prior to release into a natural wetland and shall
not be used to meet the minimum design requirements for stormwater
management or stormwater runoff quality treatment, except when used
as part of a treatment train that incorporates a portion of the outer
zone (filter strip) of the wetland's riparian buffer as a stormwater
outfall. In such instances, the discharge velocity from the terminal
end of a pipe or associated energy dissipation practice shall not
exceed two feet per second for the two-year frequency storm event.
Where such a management strategy is used, all feasible methods shall
be used to convert concentrated flow to uniform, shallow sheet flow
before entering the outer zone of the wetland's riparian buffer.
In addition, it shall be demonstrated that such an approach will not
cause erosion.
H.
All stormwater discharges from a project during the one- and
two-year frequency storms shall be reduced by at least 50% of the
allowable rate for those storm frequencies as determined in the predevelopment
hydrologic analysis for the regulated activity.
(2)
The following minimum performance standards shall apply to all applicable new development activities, pursuant to §
913.03(a):
A.
Water quality improvement shall be achieved in conjunction with or as part of infiltration practices (if used). Water quality improvements shall also be provided for drainage areas not otherwise addressed by infiltration practices either at the source of runoff and/or during conveyance away from the source of runoff. Stormwater quality management practices shall be designed to capture and treat stormwater runoff generated by the one-inch rainfall event. Refer to §
913.16(a)(2) for water quality volume design standards and assumptions. Stormwater quality management practice selection, design and implementation shall be based upon appropriate reference materials, as provided in §
913.08(b).
B.
The post-development peak discharge rate shall not exceed the predevelopment peak discharge rate multiplied by the subbasin release rate percentage (where determined in Act 167 watersheds) for the one-, two-, five-, ten-, twenty-five-, fifty- and 100-year twenty-four-hour storm events pursuant to the predevelopment cover assumption described in §
913.15(b). Refer to Appendix A for release rate percentages information.
C.
Facilities capable of attenuating rainfall runoff shall be provided and shall be designed to attenuate the runoff volume from the one-year twenty-four-hour storm event for at least 24 hours. When applying the use of green infrastructure BMPs (for example, rain garden/bioretention) that rely on existing soil infiltration rates, if it is identified that this standard cannot be met, a modification request may be submitted following the procedures in §
913.05.
D.
Stormwater shall be infiltrated and/or discharged within the
same drainage area of the stream receiving the runoff from the development
site prior to development.
E.
Structural and nonstructural stormwater management practices
that make the best possible use of infiltration on-site shall be considered
in all site designs, when appropriate.
(3)
The following minimum performance standards shall apply to all applicable redevelopment activities, pursuant to §
913.03(b):
A.
One of the following minimum performance standards shall be
accomplished. Selection of the performance standard shall be whichever
is most appropriate for the given site conditions:
1.
Reduce the total impervious cover on the site (e.g., by replacement
of pavement with pervious planting areas or green roof systems) by
at least 25%, based on a comparison of existing impervious cover to
proposed impervious cover; or
2.
Provide facilities designed to attenuate the runoff volume from
the one-year twenty-four-hour post-development storm event for at
least 24 hours; or
3.
Provide facilities to ensure that the post-development peak
discharge rate shall not exceed the predevelopment peak discharge
rate multiplied by the subbasin release rate percentage (where determined
in Act 167 watersheds) for the two-year and ten-year twenty-four-hour
storm events. A predevelopment cover CN of 71 and a time of concentration
of not less than 10 minutes shall be assumed.
B.
In addition to the minimum performance standards for redevelopment areas in §
913.14(c)(3) above, water quality improvements shall be provided for drainage areas not otherwise addressed by infiltration practices either at the source of runoff and/or during conveyance away from the source of runoff. Stormwater quality management facilities shall be designed to capture and treat 0.25 inch of runoff from all pavement areas (i.e., parking lots, pavements and noncovered sidewalks). Roof area may be excluded from this calculation.
(d) Volume controls.
(1)
The green infrastructure and low-impact development practices
provided in the BMP Manual shall be utilized for all regulated activities
whenever possible. Water volume controls shall be implemented using
the Design Storm Method in Subsection (d)(1)A or the Simplified Method
in Subsection (d)(1)B below, or alternative design criteria as allowed
by 25 Pa. Code Chapter 102.
A.
The Design Storm Method (CG-1 in the BMP Manual) is applicable
as a method to any size of regulated activity. This method requires
detailed modeling based on site conditions. The following, at a minimum,
shall be incorporated into the CG-1 Method:
1.
Do not increase the post-development total runoff volume for
all storms equal to or less than the two-year twenty-four-hour duration
precipitation.
2.
At least the first one inch of runoff from the net increase
in impervious surfaces shall be permanently removed from the runoff
flow, i.e., it shall not be released into the surface waters of this
commonwealth. Removal options include reuse, evaporation, transpiration,
and infiltration. If the developer provides justification that the
listed removal options are not feasible, and the designated plan reviewer
agrees, runoff shall be detained in a facility designed for a twenty-four-hour
to seventy-two-hour dewatering time in an area with a dedicated stormwater
system (not contributory to a combined sewer system) and shall be
detained in a facility designed for a seventy-two-hour dewatering
time in an area contributory to a combined sewer system before discharge
to local stormwater systems or the environment.
3.
For modeling purposes:
(A) Existing (predevelopment) non-forested pervious
areas must be considered meadow in good condition.
(B) Twenty percent of existing impervious area, when
present, shall be considered meadow in good condition in the model
for existing conditions.
B.
The Simplified Method (CG-2 in the BMP Manual) provided below
is independent of site conditions and should be used if the Design
Storm Method is not followed. This method is not applicable to regulated
activities greater than one acre or for projects that require design
of stormwater storage facilities. For new impervious surfaces:
1.
Stormwater facilities shall capture at least the first two inches
of runoff from the net increase in impervious surfaces.
2.
At least the first one inch of runoff from the net increase
in impervious surfaces shall be permanently removed from the runoff
flow, i.e., it shall not be released into the surface waters of this
commonwealth. Removal options include reuse, evaporation, transpiration,
and infiltration. If the developer provides justification that the
listed removal options are not feasible, and the designated plan reviewer
agrees, runoff shall be detained in a facility designed for a twenty-four-hour
dewatering time in an area with a dedicated stormwater system (not
contributory to a combined sewer system) and shall be detained in
a facility designed for a seventy-two-hour dewatering time in an area
contributory to a combined sewer system before discharge to local
stormwater systems or the environment.
3.
Whenever possible, infiltration facilities should be designed
to accommodate infiltration of the entire permanently removed runoff;
however, in all cases, at least the first 0.5 inch of the permanently
removed runoff should be infiltrated.
4.
This method is exempt from the requirements of §
913.15.
[Ord. No. 1528, 9-26-2022]
In addition to the infiltration and water quality requirements
of this article, peak flow from those activities resulting in increases
in impervious surface and/or regrading and compaction shall be attenuated
consistent with the following stormwater calculation methods:
(a) The precipitation values used for each design storm shall be abstracted
from the precipitation frequency estimates developed by the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as set forth in NOAA Atlas
14, Volume 2 (NOAA June 2004) or the latest version. The one-, two-,
five-, ten-, twenty-five-, fifty-, and 100-year return periods shall
be analyzed. The design storm values are applicable to the Soil Cover
Complex Method.
(b) The following assumptions shall be used for runoff calculations:
(1)
For new development sites, the ground cover used as the predevelopment
assumption for runoff calculations shall be as follows:
A.
Wooded sites shall use a ground cover of woodland in good condition.
Portions of a site having more than one viable tree of a DBH [diameter
at breast height (DBH) is the diameter of the tree stem 4 1/2
feet above the ground] of six inches or greater per 1,500 square feet
shall be considered wooded where such trees existed within 10 years
of application. If there is evidence of logging within the ten-year
period, the logged area shall be considered as woodland in good condition.
B.
Agricultural sites shall use a ground cover of pasture in good
condition.
C.
All other portions of a site shall use a ground cover of meadow
in good condition.
D.
All watershed area(s) contributing to the point of interest,
including off-site area, shall be considered.
(2)
Runoff curve numbers used in developing runoff calculations
shall be obtained from the Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical
Release No. 55 (USDA, 1986) or the latest version or standard. Aggregate
areas shall be considered impervious in post-development conditions.
(3)
A Type II distribution storm (for the Soil Cover Complex Method
only for example, TR-55, TR-20).
(4)
For time-of-concentration calculations, sheet flow lengths shall
not exceed 100 feet, and shallow, concentrated flow lengths shall
not exceed 1,000 feet.
(5)
Manning's roughness coefficients for sheet flow shall be
taken from Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release
No. 55 (USDA, 1986) or the latest version.
(c) In all plans and designs for stormwater management systems and facilities
submitted to the Engineer for approval, stormwater peak discharge
and runoff shall be determined through the use of the NRCS Soil Cover
Complex Method as set forth in Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds,
Technical Release No. 55 (USDA, 1986), with specific attention given
to antecedent moisture conditions, flood routing, time of concentration,
and peak discharge specifications included therein and in the Hydrology
National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, (USDA, 1985), both by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Note that when TR-55 is used for natural system-based approaches and
practices encouraged herein, calculations must be performed on a detailed
small subarea basis. Use of Technical Release No. 20 and other methods
listed in Table 1 is also acceptable. The design professional's
selection of a specific method shall be based on the suitability of
the method for the given project site conditions with due consideration
to the limitations of the method chosen. Table 1 herein summarizes
the computational methods available.
Table 1
Acceptable Computation Methodologies for Stormwater Management
Plans
|
---|
Method
|
Source
|
Applicability
|
---|
TR-20 or commercial package based on TR-20
|
USDA - NRCS
|
When use of full model is desirable or necessary
|
TR-55 or commercial package based on TR-55
|
USDA - NRCS
|
Applicable for plans within the model's limitations
|
HEC- HMS
|
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
|
When full model is desirable or necessary
|
PSRM
|
Penn State University
|
When full model is desirable or necessary
|
VT/PSUHM
|
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Penn State University
|
When full model is desirable or necessary
|
HEC-1
|
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
|
When full model is desirable or necessary
|
SWMM or commercial package based on SWMM
|
U.S. EPA
|
Most applicable in urban areas
|
Small Storm Hydrology Method (as included in SLAMM)
|
PV & Associates, or the website www.winslamm.com
|
Calculation of runoff volume from urban and suburban areas
|
(d) A Modified Rational Method analysis may be used for drainage areas
and/or development sites smaller than one acre when permitted by the
Engineer. The term "Modified Rational Method" used herein refers to
a procedure for manipulation of the basic Rational Method techniques
to reflect the fact that storms with durations greater than the normal
time of concentration for a basin will result in a larger volume of
runoff even though the peak discharge is reduced. The methodology
and model chosen for use shall be well-documented as being appropriate
for use in this region, and all relevant assumptions, methodologies,
calculations and data used shall be provided to the Engineer for review.
Information on the Modified Rational Method is presented in the Recommended
Hydrologic Procedures for Computing Urban Runoff from Small Watersheds
in Pennsylvania (PADEP, 1982).
(e) Rainfall intensities used for the Modified Rational Method shall
be based on the precipitation frequency estimates developed by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as set forth in NOAA
Atlas 14.
(f) The Rational Method (that is, Q = CIA) shall be used for calculations
of the peak rate of runoff for the design of storm sewers and drainage
swales but not for the design of stormwater management facilities
where a full hydrograph is needed. This methodology is generally limited
to drainage areas less than 10 acres in size.
Q
|
=
|
Peak flow rate, cubic feet per second (CFS).
|
C
|
=
|
Runoff coefficient, dependent on land use/cover.
|
I
|
=
|
Design rainfall intensity, inches per hour.
|
A
|
=
|
Drainage area, acres.
|
(g) Runoff characteristics of off-site areas that drain through a proposed
development shall be considered and be based on the existing conditions
in the off-site area.
(h) Impervious Area Flash (IAF) analysis. An Impervious Area Flash (IAF)
analysis shall be conducted for all sites. The analysis requires that
the watershed impervious area be modeled without the pervious areas
within the watershed. The time of concentration for the watershed
should also be determined from the impervious areas only. If the IAF
results in a higher post-development peak runoff rate than the post-development
watershed analysis, then this higher value must be used for the final
design of the stormwater management facility.
[Ord. No. 1528, 9-26-2022]
The Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual
shall serve as a guide for the design of stormwater management practices.
Additional design guidance may also be obtained from other related
sources, including the 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual, Volumes
I and II (MDE, 2000), Design of Stormwater Filtering Systems (CWP,
1996), and the American Society of Civil Engineers Manual and Report
on Engineering Practice, No. 87, Urban Runoff Quality Management (ASCE,
1998), for the design of stormwater runoff quality control features
for site development. A list of references is provided with this article. The water quality volume design measures used herein are
partially based on the methodology expressed in the Maryland Manual
referenced above. Pursuant to the design options recommended in the
above documents, the following standards shall be adhered to:
(a) Extended detention, water quality volume, infiltration and nonstructural
BMP credits criteria. The following sizing criteria shall be followed
at all sites required to meet the standards of this article:
(1)
Extended detention.
A.
Detain the one-year, twenty-four-hour design storm using the
SCS Type II distribution. The design of the facility shall consider
and minimize the chances of clogging and sedimentation potential.
B.
Detention basins shall detain the one-year storm event and allow
it to naturally infiltrate and recharge the groundwater table if possible.
All subsequent orifices and control structures for the two-, ten-,
twenty-five- and 100-year storm events shall be placed above the maximum
water surface elevation of the one-year storm.
C.
Flow from off-site areas must be considered as pass-through
flow if it is conveyed through the BMP and should be modeled as predeveloped
conditions for the one-year storm event only.
(2)
Water quality volume.
A.
Treatment of the water quality volume (WQv) of stormwater prior
to its release to receiving waters or water bodies shall be provided
at all developments where stormwater management is required. The WQv
equals the storage volume needed to capture and treat the runoff from
storms of one inch or less. Runoff from the first one inch of rainfall
transports most of the total pollutant load. The WQv is based on the
following equation:
WQv = [(P)(Rv)(A)]/12 (acre-feet)
|
Where:
|
P
|
=
|
Rainfall depth in inches (set to one inch).
|
Rv
|
=
|
Volumetric runoff coefficient, 0.05 + 0.009(1), where 1 is percent
impervious cover.
|
A
|
=
|
Site area (acres).
|
B.
The formula assumes approximately 5% runoff from pervious surfaces
and 90% runoff from impervious surfaces. A minimum of 0.2 inch per
acre of runoff volume shall be met at sites or in drainage areas that
have less than 15% impervious cover.
C.
Drainage areas having no impervious cover and no proposed disturbance
during development may be excluded from the WQv calculations. However,
designers are encouraged to incorporate water quality treatment practices
for these areas.
D.
Stormwater quality treatment. The final WQv shall be treated
by an acceptable stormwater management practice(s) from those described
in this section or as approved by the Town.
E.
For new developments and redevelopments, infiltration is considered
an acceptable method of satisfying part or all of the water quality
volume.
F.
For new developments, the WQv requirements of this section shall be sized and designed in conjunction with the standards under §
913.16(a)(1).
G.
As a basis for design, the following assumptions may be made:
1.
Multiple drainage areas. When a project contains or is divided
by multiple drainage areas, the WQv volume shall be addressed for
each drainage area.
2.
Off-site drainage areas. The WQv shall be based on the impervious
cover of the proposed site. Off-site existing impervious areas may
be excluded from the calculation of the water quality volume requirements.
(3)
Infiltration volume. Where possible, all of the water quality
volume should be treated using infiltration BMPs. The following calculation
shall be used to determine the minimum recharge goal for the site:
Recharge Volume (Rev), (acre-feet)
|
Fraction of WQv, depending on soil hydrologic group. Rev = (S)(Ai)
|
Where:
|
S
|
=
|
Soil-specific recharge factor in inches.
|
Ai
|
=
|
The measured impervious cover.
|
Hydrologic Soil Group
|
Soil-Specific Recharge Factor (S)
(inch of runoff)
|
---|
A
|
0.40
|
B
|
0.25
|
C
|
0.10
|
D
|
0.05
|
A.
Infiltrated volume may be subtracted from the total site WQv.
B.
Infiltration should not be considered for sites or areas of
sites that have activities that may allow pollution to be infiltrated.
For example, the use of infiltration for the runoff of a service station's
paved lot would not be appropriate, although roof water from the service
station may be infiltrated.
C.
Infiltration should only be used when, in the opinion of a professional
engineer, it will not contribute to slope instability or cause seepage
problems into basements or developed downgradient areas.
D.
If more than one hydrologic soil group is present at a site,
a composite recharge volume shall be computed based upon the proportion
of total site area within each hydrologic soil group.
E.
All infiltration facilities shall be set back at least 20 feet
from all structures with subgrade elements (e.g., basements, foundation
walls).
F.
All infiltration facilities shall be set back at least 20 feet
from all property lines and road rights-of-way.
G.
A detailed, on-site infiltration test is required at the location
of all infiltration BMPs.
(4)
Credits for use of nonstructural BMPs. The developer may obtain
credits for the use of nonstructural BMPs using the procedures outlined
below. Examples of nonstructural credit calculations are provided
in Appendix E.
A.
Volume Reduction Method No. 1: Natural Area Conservation.
1.
A water quality volume reduction can be taken when undisturbed
natural areas are conserved on a site, thereby retaining their predevelopment
hydrologic and water quality characteristics. Under this method, a
designer would be able to subtract the conservation areas from the
total site area when computing the water quality protection volume.
An added benefit is that the post-development peak discharges will
be smaller, and hence, water quantity control volumes will be reduced
due to lower post-development curve numbers or Rational Formula "C"
values.
2.
Rule. Subtract conservation areas from total site area when
computing water quality protection volume requirements.
3.
Criteria.
(A) Conservation area cannot be disturbed during project
construction and must be protected from sediment deposition. The conservation
area shall be protected with a safety fence until construction has
been completed. After construction, the area shall be posted with
signage indicating that it is a conservation area.
(B) Shall be protected by limits of disturbance clearly
shown on all construction drawings.
(C) Shall be located within an acceptable conservation
easement instrument that ensures perpetual protection of the proposed
area. The easement must clearly specify how the natural area vegetation
shall be managed and boundaries will be marked. [Note: Managed turf
(e.g., playgrounds, regularly maintained open areas) is not an acceptable
form of vegetation management.]
(D) Shall have a minimum contiguous area requirement
of 10,000 square feet.
(E) Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
(F) Must be forested or have a stable, natural ground
cover.
B.
Volume Reduction Method No. 2: Stream Buffers.
1.
This reduction can be taken when a stream buffer effectively
treats stormwater runoff. Effective treatment constitutes treating
runoff through overland flow in a naturally vegetated or forested
buffer. Under the proposed method, a designer would be able to subtract
areas draining via overland flow to the buffer from total site area
when computing water quality protection volume requirements. The design
of the stream buffer treatment system must use appropriate methods
for conveying flows above the annual recurrence (one-year storm) event.
2.
Rule. Subtract areas draining via overland flow to the buffer
from total site area when computing water quality protection volume
requirements.
3.
Criteria.
(A) The minimum undisturbed buffer width shall be 50
feet from top of bank.
(B) The maximum contributing length shall be 150 feet
for pervious surfaces and 75 feet for impervious surfaces.
(C) The average contributing slope shall be 3% maximum
unless a flow spreader is used. In no case shall the average contributing
slope be greater than 10%.
(D) Runoff shall enter the buffer as overland sheet
flow. A flow spreader can be installed to ensure this.
(E) Buffers shall remain as naturally vegetated or
forested areas and will require only routine debris removal or erosion
repairs.
(F) Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
(G) Not applicable if overland flow filtration/groundwater
recharge reduction is already being taken.
C.
Volume Reduction Method No. 3: Enhanced Swales.
1.
This reduction may be taken when enhanced swales are used for
water quality protection. Under the proposed method, a designer would
be able to subtract the areas draining to an enhanced swale from total
site area when computing water quality protection volume requirements.
An enhanced swale can fully meet the water quality protection volume
requirements for certain kinds of low-density residential development.
(See Volume Reduction Method No. 5.) An added benefit is the post-development
peak discharges will likely be lower due to a longer time of concentration
for the site.
2.
Rule. Subtract the areas draining to an enhanced swale from
total site area when computing water quality protection volume requirements.
3.
Criteria.
(A) This method is typically only applicable to moderate-
or low-density residential land uses (three dwelling units per acre
maximum).
(B) The maximum flow velocity for the water quality
design storm shall be less than or equal to 1.0 foot per second.
(C) The minimum residence time for the water quality
storm shall be five minutes.
(D) The bottom width shall be a maximum of six feet.
If a larger channel is needed, use of a compound cross section is
required.
(E) The side slopes shall be 3:1 (horizontal:vertical)
or flatter.
(F) The channel slope shall be 3% or less.
(G) Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
D.
Volume Reduction Method No. 4: Overland Flow Filtration/Groundwater
Recharge Zones.
1.
This reduction can be taken when overland flow filtration/infiltration
zones are incorporated into the site design to receive runoff from
rooftops or other small impervious areas (e.g., driveways, small parking
lots, etc.). This can be achieved by grading the site to promote overland
vegetative filtering or by providing infiltration or rain garden areas.
If impervious areas are adequately disconnected, they can be deducted
from total site area when computing the water quality protection volume
requirements. An added benefit will be that the post-development peak
discharges will likely be lower due to a longer time of concentration
for the site.
2.
Rule. If impervious areas are adequately disconnected, they
can be deducted from total site area when computing the water quality
protection volume requirements.
3.
Criteria.
(A) Relatively permeable soils (Hydrologic Soil Groups
A and B) should be present.
(B) Runoff shall not come from a designated hotspot.
(C) The maximum contributing impervious flow path length
shall be 75 feet.
(D) Downspouts shall be at least 10 feet away from
the nearest impervious surface to discourage reconnections.
(E) The disconnection shall drain continuously through
a vegetated channel, swale, or filter strip to the property line or
structural stormwater control.
(F) The length of the disconnection shall be equal
to or greater than the contributing length.
(G) The entire vegetative disconnection shall be on
a slope less than or equal to 3%.
(H) The surface impervious area tributary to any one
discharge location shall not exceed 5,000 square feet.
(I) For those areas draining directly to a buffer,
reduction can be obtained from either overland flow filtration or
stream buffers. (See Method No. 2.)
(J) Rv is kept constant when calculating WQv.
E.
Volume Reduction Method No. 5: Environmentally Sensitive Large-Lot
Subdivisions.
1.
This reduction can be taken when a group of environmental site
design techniques are applied to low- and very-low-density residential
development [e.g., one dwelling unit per two acres (du/ac) or lower].
The use of this method can eliminate the need for structural stormwater
controls to treat water quality protection volume requirements. This
method is targeted towards large-lot subdivisions and will likely
have limited application.
2.
Rule: targeted towards large-lot subdivisions (e.g., two- acre
lots and greater). The requirement for structural facilities to treat
the water quality protection volume may be waived.
3.
Criteria.
(A) For single-lot development:
a. Total site impervious cover is less than 15%.
b. Lot size shall be at least two acres.
c. Rooftop runoff is disconnected in accordance with
the criteria in Method No. 4.
d. Grass channels are used to convey runoff versus
curb and gutter.
(B) For multiple lots:
a. Total impervious cover footprint shall be less than
15% of the area.
b. Lot areas should be at least two acres, unless clustering
is implemented. Open space developments should have a minimum of 25%
of the site protected as natural conservation areas and shall be at
least a half-acre average individual lot size.
c. Grass channels should be used to convey runoff versus
curb and gutter (see Method No. 3).
d. Overland flow filtration/infiltration zones should
be established (see Method No. 4).
(b) Stormwater infiltration practices.
(1)
In selecting the appropriate infiltration BMPs, the applicant
shall consider the following:
A.
Permeability and infiltration rate of the site soils.
B.
Slope and depth to bedrock.
C.
Seasonal high water table.
D.
Proximity to building foundations and wellheads.
F.
Land availability and topography.
H.
Effects on nearby properties and structures.
(2)
Loading ratios.
A.
The loading ratio of impervious surface to infiltration bed
bottom size must be considered in all designs. The loading ratio describes
the ratio of impervious drainage area to infiltration area, or the
ratio of total drainage area to infiltration area. The following loading
ratios may not be exceeded:
1.
Maximum impervious loading ratio of 5:1 relating impervious
surface draining to a particular infiltration area.
2.
Maximum total loading ratio of 8:1 relating total drainage area
to infiltration area.
3.
Maximum impervious loading ratio of 3:1 relating impervious
drainage area to infiltration area for Karst topography.
B.
If a BMP is proposed to exceed any of these values, a detailed
geotechnical analysis prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer
will be required to determine the overall effects to downstream properties
should the load ratios be exceeded. Items such as groundwater mounding
and the potential for subsurface flooding of downstream structures
should be clearly addressed. The Town Engineer will review this analysis
and render an opinion on the viability of the property design.
(3)
A detailed soils evaluation of the project site shall be performed
to determine the suitability of infiltration BMPs. The evaluation
shall be performed by a qualified professional and, at a minimum,
address soil permeability, depth to bedrock and slope stability. The
general process for designing the infiltration BMP shall be:
A.
Analyze hydrologic soil groups as well as natural and man-made
features within the watershed to determine general areas of suitability
for infiltration BMPs.
B.
Provide field testing data to determine appropriate percolation
rate and/or hydraulic connectivity.
C.
Design infiltration BMPs for required stormwater volume based
on field-determined capacity at the level of the proposed infiltration
surface.
(4)
Soil characteristics are subject to the specific considerations
below:
A.
Infiltration BMPs are particularly appropriate in Hydrologic
Soil Groups A and B, as described in the Natural Resources Conservation
Manual TR-55.
B.
Low-erodibility factors ("K" factors) are preferred for the
construction of basins.
C.
There must be a minimum of 24 inches between the bottom of any
facility (i.e., basin bottom for noninfiltration facilitates or infiltration
media bottom for facilities) and the seasonal high water table and/or
bedrock (limiting zones) for facilitates located outside floodplains.
There must be a minimum of 48 inches between the bottom of any facility
(i.e., basin bottom for noninfiltration facilitates or infiltration
media bottom for facilities) and the seasonal high water table and/or
bedrock (limiting zones) for facilitates located within floodplains.
D.
There must be an infiltration and/or percolation rate sufficient
to accept the additional stormwater load and to drain completely as
determined by field tests.
E.
The infiltration system shall have positive overflow controls
to prevent storage within one foot of the finished surface or grade.
F.
Infiltration rates shall not be used for computing the storage
volume of the infiltration system.
G.
Surface inflows shall be designed to prevent direct discharge
of sediment into the infiltration system.
(5)
The recharge volume provided at the site shall be directed to
the most permeable hydrologic soil group available, except where other
considerations apply, such as in limestone geology.
(6)
Any infiltration BMP shall be capable of completely infiltrating
the impounded water within 48 hours. The forty-eight-hour period is
to be measured from the end of the twenty-four-hour design storm.
(7)
The Town may require additional analyses for stormwater management
facilities proposed for susceptible areas such as:
B.
Storage areas for salt, chloride, other materials for winter
deicing.
C.
Unstable and steep slopes.
(8)
During the period of land disturbance, runoff shall be controlled
prior to entering any proposed infiltration area. Areas proposed for
infiltration BMPs shall be protected from sedimentation and compaction
during the construction phase so as to maintain their maximum infiltration
capacity.
(9)
Infiltration BMPs shall not be constructed nor receive runoff
until the entire contributory drainage area to the infiltration BMP
has received final stabilization.
(10)
Infiltration facilities shall be selected based on suitability
of soils and site conditions. Acceptable infiltration includes but
is not limited to: filter strips or stormwater filtering systems (for
example, bioretention facilities, sand filters), open vegetated channels
(that is, dry swales and wet swales), infiltration trenches, dry wells,
infiltration basins, porous paving systems, retention basins, wet
extended detention ponds, riparian corridor management, riparian forested
buffers, rooftop runoff management systems, and sand filters (closed
or open).
(11)
Where sediment transport in the stormwater runoff is anticipated
to reach the infiltration system, appropriate permanent measures to
prevent or collect sediment shall be installed prior to discharge
to the infiltration system.
(12)
Large infiltration facilities, such as retention basins or detention
ponds, shall be set back at least 20 feet from all habitable structures
with subgrade elements (e.g., basements, foundation walls). Small
infiltration facilities, such as rain gardens or vegetated swales,
may be set back 10 feet from habitable structures with subgrade elements.
(13)
All infiltration facilities that serve more than one lot and
are considered a common facility shall have a private drainage easement.
The easement shall provide to the Town the right of access.
(14)
If detailed infiltration study is required, the following guidelines
shall be followed:
A.
Soil evaluations shall be performed to determine the feasibility
and extent to which infiltration systems can be used. The evaluation
shall be performed by a qualified, licensed geologist, geotechnical/civil
engineer, or soil scientist and, at a minimum, address soil types,
soil permeability, depth to bedrock, limitations of soils, presence/absence
of carbonate geology, susceptibility to subsidence and/or sinkhole
formation, and subgrade stability. The testing and evaluation should
be completed at the preliminary design stage.
B.
Infiltration requirements shall be based on the portions of
the site that are permeable prior to disturbance and the degree to
which development will reduce the permeability of the site. Permeability
of the site shall be determined based on the detailed evaluations
described herein. Use of stormwater management facilities to retain
stormwater for infiltration should be applied to all areas where the
soils evaluation indicates favorable conditions. Areas generally not
favorable for infiltration shall still be provided with an appropriate
water quality practice.
C.
Soil infiltration tests shall be performed to an equivalent
depth or elevation of the bottom of the proposed infiltration areas.
These tests shall follow the procedures of percolation test holes
as established by the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) for
on-lot septic systems or Appendix C, Site Evaluation and Soil Testing,
in the PA Stormwater BMP Manual.
D.
The testing shall include a test pit and percolation test holes.
The test hole shall be excavated to a depth so that the presence or
absence of bedrock and/or seasonal high water table can be determined.
A soil log describing the soils present in each test pit shall be
performed. All test holes used for evaluating the percolation rate
shall be presoaked in accordance with the procedures established by
the ACHD. The location and number of test pits and percolation holes
shall be determined based on the type(s) of stormwater management
facilities being designed. Acceptability of infiltration rates shall
be based on sound engineering judgment and recommended design considerations
described in the design manuals listed in the references or other
source material acceptable to the Engineer.
(15)
The following design and construction standards shall be followed
when planning and constructing infiltration BMPs:
A.
The lowest elevation of the infiltration area, when located
outside a floodplain, shall be at least two feet above the seasonal
high water table and bedrock. The lowest elevation of the infiltration
area, when located within a floodplain, shall be at least four feet
above the seasonal high water table and bedrock.
B.
Where roof drains are designed to discharge to infiltration
facilities, they shall have appropriate measures to prevent clogging
by unwanted debris (for example, silt, leaves and vegetation). Such
measures shall include, but are not limited to, leaf traps, gutter
guards and cleanouts.
C.
All infiltration facilities shall have appropriate positive
overflow controls to prevent storage within one foot of the finished
surface or grade unless a specific amount of surface storage away
from pedestrian and vehicular traffic is provided and such areas infiltrate
the stored volume within 48 hours after the end of the twenty-four-hour
design storm.
D.
All infiltration facilities shall be designed to infiltrate
the stored volume within 48 hours after the end of the twenty-four-hour
design storm.
E.
All surface inflows shall be treated to prevent the direct discharge
of sediment into the infiltration facility. Accumulated sediment reduces
stormwater storage capacity and ultimately clogs the infiltration
mechanism. No sand, salt or other particulate matter may be applied
to a porous (pervious) surface for winter ice conditions.
F.
During site construction, all infiltration practice components
shall be protected from compaction due to heavy equipment operation
or storage of fill or construction material. Infiltration areas shall
also be protected from sedimentation. Areas that are accidentally
compacted or graded shall be remediated to restore soil composition
and porosity. Adequate documentation to this effect shall be submitted
for review by the Engineer. All areas designated for infiltration
shall not receive runoff until the contributory drainage area has
achieved final stabilization.
G.
The following procedures and materials shall be required during
the construction of all subsurface facilities:
1.
Excavation for the infiltration facility shall be performed
with equipment that will not compact the bottom of the seepage bed/trench
or like facility.
2.
The bottom of the bed and/or trench shall be scarified prior
to the placement of aggregate.
3.
Only clean aggregate with documented porosity, free of fines,
shall be allowed.
4.
The tops and sides of all seepage beds, trenches, or like facilities
shall be covered with drainage fabric. Fabric shall meet the specifications
of PennDOT Publication 408, Section 735, Construction Class 1.
5.
Perforated distribution pipes connected to centralized catch
basins and/or manholes with the provision for the collection of debris
shall be provided in all facilities. Where perforated pipes are used
to distribute stormwater to the infiltration practice, stormwater
shall be distributed uniformly throughout the entire seepage bed/trench
or like facility.
(c) Open vegetated channels.
(1)
Open vegetated channels are conveyance systems that are engineered
to also perform as water quality and infiltration facilities. Such
systems can be used for the conveyance, retention, infiltration, and
filtration of stormwater runoff.
(2)
Open vegetated channels primarily serve a water quality function
(WQv); they also have the potential to augment infiltration. Examples
of such systems include, but are not limited to: dry swales, wet swales,
grass channels, and biofilters. Open vegetated channels are primarily
applicable for land uses such as roads, highways, residential developments
(dry swales only) and pervious areas.
(3)
Open vegetated channels shall be designed to meet the following
minimum standards:
A.
The channel shall be designed to safely convey the ten-year
frequency storm event with a freeboard of at least 12 inches. "Freeboard"
is the difference between the elevation of the design flow in the
channel and the top elevation of the channel.
B.
The peak velocity of the runoff from the ten-year storm shall
be nonerosive for the soil and ground cover provided in the channel.
C.
The longitudinal slope shall be no greater than 6%. Check dams
or turf reinforcement matting is recommended for slopes between 3%
and 6%.
D.
Channels shall be trapezoidal in cross section.
E.
Channels shall be designed with moderate side slopes of two
horizontal to one vertical. Flatter side slopes may be necessary under
certain circumstances.
F.
The maximum allowable ponding time in the channel shall be less
than 48 hours.
G.
Channels (for example, dry swales) may require an underdrain
in order to function and dewater.
H.
Channels shall be designed to temporarily store the WQv within
the system for a maximum period of 48 hours and a minimum period of
one hour.
I.
Landscape specifications shall address the grass species, wetland
plantings (if applicable), soil amendment and hydric conditions present
along the channel.
J.
Accumulated sediment within the channel bottom shall be removed
when 25% of the original WQv volume has been exceeded. The channel
shall be provided with a permanent concrete cleanout marker that indicates
the 25% loss level.
K.
Check dams along the channel length may be warranted.
L.
The bottom of dry swales shall be situated at least two feet
above the seasonal high water table.
(4)
Additional design information for open vegetated channels is
available in Design of Roadside Channels with Flexible Linings, HEC
15, FHWA, September 2005.
(d) Retention basins.
(1)
Retention basins shall be designed to create a healthy ecological community with sufficient circulation of water to prevent the growth of unwanted vegetation and mosquitoes or other vectors. If circulation cannot be provided via natural means, then artificial aeration and circulation shall be provided. Care shall be taken to landscape retention basins in accordance with §
913.17.
(2)
The retention basin shall be of sufficient size to allow the
appropriate aquatic community needed to maintain healthy pond ecology
and avoid mosquitoes capable of carrying West Nile virus and other
diseases. The Allegheny County Health Department, the Pennsylvania
Fish and Boat Commission, the Natural Resources Conservation Service,
the Pennsylvania Extension Service, or other qualified professional
consultant shall be consulted during the design of these facilities
in order to ensure the health of aquatic communities and minimize
the risk of creating mosquito breeding areas.
(3)
An outlet structure shall be designed to allow complete drainage
of the pond for maintenance.
(4)
The design of a retention basin shall include the determination
of the proposed site's ability to support a viable permanent
pool. The design shall take into account such factors as the available
and required rate and quality of dry weather inflow, the stormwater
inflow, seasonal and longer-term variations in groundwater table,
and impacts of potential pollutant loadings.
(5)
Sediment storage volume equal to at least 20% of the volume
of the permanent pool shall be provided.
(6)
A sediment forebay with a hardened bottom shall be provided
at each inlet into the retention basin. The forebay storage capacity
shall, at a minimum, be 10% of the permanent pool storage. The forebay
shall be designed to allow for access by maintenance equipment for
periodic cleaning. A permanent concrete cleanout maker shall be installed
in the forebay to indicate the level where 25% for the forebay storage
has been used.
(7)
Emergency spillways shall be sized and located to permit the
safe passage of stormwater flows from an unattenuated, 100-year, post-development
storm with one foot of freeboard. The maximum velocities in vegetated
spillways excavated in otherwise undisturbed soil shall be analyzed
based upon the velocity of peak flow in the emergency spillway during
an assumed clogged primary outlet condition. Where maximum velocities
exceed design standards contained in the Engineering Field Manual
for Conservation Practices (USDA, SCS, July 1984), suitable lining
shall be provided. All emergency spillways placed on fill materials
shall be lined. Lining for emergency spillways shall incorporate native
colors and materials where possible, including mono slab revetments,
grass pavers, riprap and native stone.
(8)
Basin and pond embankments must be designed by a professional
engineer registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The design
must include an investigation of the subsurface conditions at the
proposed embankment location to evaluate settlement potential, groundwater
impacts, and the need for seepage controls. The submittal of a geotechnical
report from a geotechnical engineer for any embankment over 10 feet
in effective height or posing a significant hazard to downstream property
or life is required. The selection of fill materials must be subject
to approval of the design engineer. Fill must be free of frozen soil,
rocks over six inches, sod, brush, stumps, tree roots, wood, or other
perishable materials. Embankment fills less than 10 feet in fill height
must be compacted using compaction methods that would reasonably guarantee
that the fill density is at least 90% of the maximum density as determined
by standard proctor (ASTM-698). All embankment fills more than 10
feet in fill height must be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
density as determined by standard proctor (ASTM-698) and must have
their density verified by field density testing. A PADEP dam permit
is required for embankments having a maximum depth of water, measured
from the upstream toe of the dam to the top of the dam at maximum
storage elevation, of greater than 15 feet; and/or for ponds having
contributory drainage area of greater than 100 acres; and/or for impoundments
of greater than 50 acre-feet.
(9)
The embankment's interior and exterior slopes may not be
steeper than 3:1 (three horizontal to one vertical).
(10)
The minimum embankment width shall be five feet for embankments
less than three feet in height, 10 feet if the embankment is between
3.1 feet and 9.9 feet in height, and 15 feet if the embankment is
higher than 10 feet.
(11)
Existing ponds or permanent pool basins can be used for stormwater
management, provided that it can be demonstrated that the ponds are
structurally sound and meet the design requirements herein.
(12)
Inlet structures and outlet structures shall be separated to
the greatest extent possible in order to maximize the flow path through
the retention basin.
(13)
Retention basins shall be designed to provide a length-to-width
ratio of at least 2L:1W as measured in plan view (for example, a ratio
of 4L:1W is too narrow).
(14)
The retention basin depth shall average three to six feet.
(15)
A five-foot-wide bench around the pond perimeter is required
at an elevation of one foot below the permanent water surface elevation.
A structural or vegetative barrier may be required by the Town.
(16)
Stabilization. Proper stabilization structures, including stilling
basins, energy dissipaters, and channel lining, shall be constructed
at the outlets of all retention basins and emergency spillways. The
stabilization structures shall control water to: avoid erosion, reduce
velocities of released water and direct water so that it does not
interfere with downstream activities.
(17)
Energy dissipaters shall be installed to prevent erosion and/or
initiate sheet flow at points where pipes or drainageways discharge
to or from basins. Energy dissipaters shall comply with criteria in
Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipaters for Culverts and Channels,
HEC 14, FHWA, July 2006. Such facilities shall be both functional
and harmonious with the surrounding environment; for example, native
rock shall be used in constructing dissipaters where practical.
(18)
Discharge points. The minimum distance between a proposed basin
discharge point (including the energy dissipater, etc.) and a downstream
property boundary shall in no case be less than 20 feet. Where there
is discharge onto or through adjacent properties prior to release
to a stream, designers shall demonstrate how downstream properties
are to be protected. The Engineer may require that the setback distance
be increased based upon factors such as topography, soil conditions,
the size of structures, the location of structures, and discharge
rates. A drainage easement may also be required.
(19)
Outlet structures. Outlet structures shall meet the following
specifications:
A.
To minimize clogging and to facilitate cleaning and inspecting,
outlet pipes shall have an internal diameter of at least 15 inches
and a minimum grade of 1%.
B.
Bentonite plugs shall be provided on all outlet pipes within
a constructed berm.
C.
All principal outlet structures shall be built using reinforced
concrete with watertight construction joints.
D.
The use of architecturally treated concrete, stucco, painted
surface or stone facade treatment shall be considered for enhancing
the outlet structure. Such facilities shall be both functional and
harmonious in design with the surrounding environment.
E.
Outlet pipes shall be constructed of reinforced concrete with
rubber gaskets in conformance with AASHTO M170, M198 and M207, or
smooth interior HDPE pipe in conformance with AASHTO M252 or M294.
F.
Basin outlet structures shall have childproof, nonclogging trash
racks overall design openings exceeding 12 inches in diameter except
those openings designed to carry perennial stream flows. Periodic
cleaning of debris from trash racks shall be included in the operation
and maintenance plan.
G.
Anti-vortex devices, consisting of a thin vertical plate normal
to the basin berm, shall be provided at the top of all circular risers
or standpipes.
(20)
An easement 25 feet in width must be provided around the top
perimeter of all retention facilities. This easement shall remain
clear of any structures, sheds, retaining walls, swing sets, stored
debris, etc. The entire twenty-five-foot easement, unless otherwise
approved by the Town, must remain on the applicant's property.
(21)
All detention facilities shall be provided with an access road
(with a legal easement) for maintenance purposes. The design criteria
for such access roads shall be as follows:
A.
Access roads shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and have a maximum
grade of 15%.
B.
Access must be provided from a public street to the berm of
the facility so that equipment can obtain access to the outlet control
works without entering the water impoundment area.
C.
Access roads with gradients of 3% or less are permitted to be
constructed with a stabilized base material and natural surface or
equal as approved by the Town.
D.
Access roads with gradients of 10% or less are permitted to
be constructed with a stabilized base material and bituminous seal
coat surface in accordance with PennDOT Publication 408, Section 470,
or equal as approved by the Town.
E.
A permanent easement must be provided for the access roadway
from the public right-of-way to the stormwater detention facility.
This easement shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width.
F.
Access roads with gradients exceeding 10% shall be constructed
with full depth bituminous pavement or concrete surfacing as approved
by the Town.
G.
Where deemed necessary by the Town, a permanent gate shall be
provided for the access roadway. The design for the gate must be submitted
to and approved by the Town.
(e) Detention basins.
(1)
The landscape standards of §
913.17 shall apply.
(2)
The maximum interior and exterior side slopes shall not exceed three horizontal to one vertical (3H:1V). The minimum required slope for the basin bottom is 2%. A level bottom is acceptable, provided that the designer demonstrates to the Town's satisfaction that the basin bottom will be landscaped with appropriate wetland vegetation pursuant to §
913.17. In addition, detention basins of sufficient size and slope may serve other functions as well, including recreational uses, which do not hinder or conflict with the function of the detention basin.
(3)
Inlet structures. The inlet pipe invert into a basin shall be
set above the one-year quality storm elevation or a minimum of six
inches above the basin floor or lining so that the pipe can adequately
drain after rainstorms. Inlets shall discharge into areas of the basin
that slope toward the outlet structure.
(4)
Inlet structures and outlet structures shall be separated to
the greatest extent possible in order to maximize the flow path through
the retention basin.
(5)
Low-flow channels. Low-flow channels constructed of concrete
or asphalt are not permitted. Where low-flow channels are necessary,
they shall be composed of a natural or bioengineered material. Low-flow
channels shall be designed to promote water quality and slow the rate
of flow through the basin. Low-flow channels may also be designed
to infiltrate where practical. The minimum slope of a low-flow channel
shall be 1%.
(6)
Outlet structures. Outlet structures shall meet the following
specifications:
A.
To minimize clogging and to facilitate cleaning and inspection,
outlet pipes shall have an internal diameter of at least 15 inches
and a minimum grade of 1%.
B.
Bentonite plugs shall be provided on all outlet pipes within
a constructed berm.
C.
All principal outlet structures shall be built using reinforced
concrete with watertight construction joints.
D.
The use of architecturally treated concrete, stucco, painted
surface or stone facade treatment shall be considered for enhancing
the outlet structure. Such facilities shall be both functional and
harmonious in design with the surrounding environment.
E.
Outlet pipes shall be constructed of reinforced concrete with
rubber gaskets in conformance with AASHTO M170, M198 and M207, or
smooth interior HDPE pipe in conformance with AASHTO M252 or M294.
F.
Energy-dissipation facilities that convert concentrated flow
to uniform shallow sheet flow shall be used where appropriate.
G.
Basin outlet structures shall have childproof, nonclogging trash
racks overall design opening exceeding 12 inches in diameter except
those openings designed to carry perennial stream flows.
H.
Anti-vortex devices, consisting of a thin vertical plate normal
to the basin berm, shall be provided at the top of all circular risers
or standpipes.
(7)
Emergency spillways shall be sized and located to permit the
safe passage of stormwater flows from an unattenuated, 100-year, post-development
storm with one foot of freeboard. The maximum velocities in vegetated
spillways excavated in otherwise undisturbed soil shall be analyzed
based upon the velocity of peak flow in the emergency spillway during
an assumed clogged primary outlet condition. Where maximum velocities
exceed design standards contained in the Engineering Field Manual
for Conservation Practices (USDA, SCS, July 1984), suitable lining
shall be provided. In general, emergency spillways should not be located
in fill areas; all such facilities placed on fill materials shall
be lined. Lining for emergency spillways shall incorporate native
colors and materials where possible, including mono slab revetments,
grass pavers, riprap, and native stone.
(8)
Basin and pond embankments must be designed by a professional
engineer registered in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The design
must include an investigation of the subsurface conditions at the
proposed embankment location to evaluate settlement potential, groundwater
impacts, and the need for seepage controls. The submittal of a geotechnical
report from a geotechnical engineer for any embankment over 10 feet
in effective height or posing a significant hazard to downstream property
or life is required. The selection of fill materials must be subject
to approval of the design engineer. Fill must be free of frozen soil,
rocks over six inches, sod, brush, stumps, tree roots, wood, or other
perishable materials. Embankment fills less than 10 feet in fill height
must be compacted using compaction methods that would reasonably guarantee
that the fill density is at least 90% of the maximum density as determined
by standard proctor (ASTM-698). All embankment fills more than 10
feet in fill height must be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
density as determined by standard proctor (ASTM-698) and must have
their density verified by field density testing. A PADEP dam permit
is required for embankments having a maximum depth of water, measured
from the upstream toe of the dam to the top of the dam at maximum
storage elevation, of greater than 15 feet; and/or for ponds having
contributory drainage area of greater than 100 acres; and/or for impoundments
of greater than 50 acre-feet.
(9)
Except where special erosion-protection measures are provided,
all disturbed areas shall be graded evenly, topped with four inches
of topsoil, fertilized, seeded, and mulched by methods approved by
the Town. Seed mixes including crown vetch shall not be permitted.
(10)
The minimum embankment width shall be five feet for embankments
less than three feet in height, 10 feet if the embankment is between
3.1 feet and 9.9 feet in height and 15 feet if the embankment is higher
than 10 feet.
(11)
A structural or vegetative barrier may be required by the Town.
(12)
Energy dissipaters shall be installed to prevent erosion and/or
initiate sheet flow at points where pipes or drainageways discharge
to or from basins. Level spreaders shall be used only where the maximum
slope between the discharge point and the waterway does not exceed
5%. Energy dissipaters shall comply with criteria in Hydraulic Design
of Energy Dissipaters for Culverts and Channels, HEC 14, FHWA, July
2006. Such facilities shall be both functional and attractive; for
example, native rock shall be used in constructing dissipaters where
practical.
(13)
Stabilization. Proper stabilization structures, including stilling
basins, energy dissipaters, and channel lining, shall be constructed
at the outlets of all basins and emergency spillways. The stabilization
structures shall control water to avoid erosion, reduce velocities
of released water and direct water so that it does not interfere with
downstream activities.
(14)
Discharge points. The minimum distance between a proposed basin
discharge point (including the energy dissipater, etc.) and a downstream
property boundary shall in no case be less than 20 feet. Where there
is discharge onto or through adjacent properties prior to release
to a stream, designers shall demonstrate how downstream properties
are to be protected. The Engineer may require that the setback distance
be increased based upon factors such as topography, soil conditions,
the size of structures, the location of structures, and discharge
rates. A drainage easement may also be required.
(15)
A sediment forebay with a hardened bottom shall be provided
at each inlet into the detention basin. The forebay storage capacity
shall at minimum be 10% of the permanent pool storage. The forebay
shall be designed to allow for access by maintenance equipment for
periodic cleaning.
(16)
A private easement, 25 feet in width, must be provided around
the top perimeter of all detention facilities. This easement shall
remain clear of any structures, sheds, retaining walls, swing sets,
stored debris, etc. The entire twenty-five-foot easement must remain
on the applicant's property.
(17)
All detention facilities shall be provided with an access road
(with a legal easement) for maintenance purposes. The design criteria
for such access roads shall be as follows:
A.
Access roads shall be a minimum of 10 feet wide and have a maximum
grade of 15%.
B.
Access must be provided from a public street to the berm of
the facility so that equipment can obtain access to the outlet control
works without entering the water impoundment area.
C.
Access roads with gradients of 3% or less are permitted to be
constructed with a stabilized base material and natural surface, or
equal as approved by the Town.
D.
Access roads with gradients of 10% or less are permitted to
be constructed with a stabilized base material and bituminous seal
coat surface in accordance with PennDOT Publication 408, Section 470,
or equal as approved by the Town.
E.
A permanent easement must be provided for the access roadway
from the public right-of-way to the stormwater detention facility.
This easement shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width.
F.
Access roads with gradients exceeding 10% shall be constructed
with full depth bituminous pavement or concrete surfacing as approved
by the Town.
G.
Where deemed necessary by the Town, a permanent gate shall be
provided for the access roadway. The design for the gate must be submitted
to and approved by the Town.
(18)
The volume and rate control capacities must drain in a period
between 24 and 72 hours after the design storm.
(f) Conveyance systems (open channels, drainageways, and storm sewers).
(1)
Applicants are encouraged to design conveyance systems that
encourage infiltration and improve water quality wherever practicable.
(2)
All conveyance systems shall convey stormwater to the nearest
established stream channel as approved by the Engineer or storm sewer
system.
(3)
All conveyance systems shall have the appropriate erosion and/or
energy-dissipation controls installed.
(4)
Conveyance systems should not be installed parallel and near
the top or bottom of major embankments to avoid the possibility of
slope failure.
(5)
Wherever conveyance channels are necessary, drainage shall be
maintained by an open channel with landscaped banks designed to carry
the 100-year stormwater runoff from upstream contributory areas. The
Engineer may increase the design storm, as conditions require. All
open channels shall be designed with one foot of freeboard above the
design water surface elevation of the design runoff condition.
(6)
Flood relief channels shall be provided and designed to convey
the runoff from the 100-year, twenty-four-hour storm, such that a
positive discharge of this runoff to an adequate receiving stream
or conveyance system occurs without allowing this runoff to encroach
upon other properties.
(7)
Storm sewers and their appurtenant facilities shall be designed
to convey the runoff from the 100-year storm. At no time shall the
hydraulic grade line or energy grade line exceed the top of any inlet
or manhole. Supporting calculations to document compliance with this
requirement must be provided to the Engineer for review and approval.
(8)
All storm inlets, manholes, endwalls, and headwalls shall be
constructed in accordance with the Town Standard Specifications, Design
Standards, and Details (latest edition).
(9)
Storm inlets shall be placed at all street intersections and
should be placed on the tangent and not the curved portions of any
street. If possible, inlets shall be placed at lot lines to avoid
potential conflicts with driveways.
(10)
Storm inlets which are deeper than five feet in depth shall
have ladder bars installed.
(11)
A subarea drainage area map delineating the area draining to
each inlet point of the storm sewer system is required to be part
of the stormwater management plan.
(12)
All storm sewer pipe proposed for public dedication, either
to the Town or a homeowners' association, shall be greater than
or equal to 15 inches in diameter.
(13)
All storm sewer pipe proposed for public dedication under the
cartway must be constructed of a minimum Class III reinforced concrete
pipe (RCP) or as approved by the Town.
(14)
No corrugated metal pipe may be used for storm sewers to be
dedicated to the Town or a homeowners' association.
(15)
The minimum grade on any storm sewer pipe shall be 1%, unless
otherwise approved by the Engineer.
(16)
Concrete anchors, per the Town Standard Specifications, Design
Standards, and Details (latest edition), shall be required where the
storm sewer pipe slope exceeds 20%.
(17)
Manholes and/or inlets shall not be spaced more than 300 feet
apart for pipe sizes up to 24 inches in diameter and not more than
450 feet apart for larger pipe sizes. Inlet capacity for inlets in
paved or other impervious areas shall be based on the design standards
provided by the latest edition of PennDOT Publication 584 and 13M.
If acceptable information is not available, inlets in nonponding areas
shall be designed for a maximum capacity of four cubic feet per second
(cfs). When ponding occurs, inlet capacity shall be based on accepted
engineering design practices.
(18)
Where drainage swales are used in lieu of, or in addition to, storm sewers, they shall be designed to carry the required runoff without erosion and in a manner not detrimental to the properties they cross. Drainage swales shall provide a minimum grade of 2% but shall not exceed a grade of 9%. Drainage swales used strictly for conveyance are not the same as open vegetated channels. Design standards for open vegetated channels are provided under §
913.16(c) of this article.
(19)
On streets that must contain curbing, storm sewers shall be
placed in front of the curbing. To the greatest extent possible, storm
sewers shall not be placed directly under curbing. At curbed street
intersections, storm inlets shall be placed in the tangent section
of the road.
(20)
Use of grassed swales or open vegetated swales in lieu of curbing
to convey, infiltrate and/or treat stormwater runoff from roadways
is encouraged. Inlets shall be placed at the center of the shoulder
swale draining the street and shall be located no closer than four
feet from the edge of the cartway.
(21)
Roof drains and sump pumps shall discharge to infiltration or
vegetated BMPs where feasible.
(22)
The developers shall obtain or grant a minimum twenty-foot-wide,
private drainage easement over all storm sewers, drainage swales,
channels, etc., that are a component of the stormwater management
system when located within undedicated land. All permanent detention
basins and/or other stormwater management facilities providing stormwater
control for other than a single residential lot shall be located within
a defined, private drainage easement that allows proper legal access
and maintenance vehicle access.
(23)
No property owner shall obstruct or alter the flow, location
or carrying capacity of a stream, channel, or drainage swale to the
detriment of any other property owner, whether upstream or downstream.
All subdivision and/or land development plans containing streams,
channels, drainage swales, storm sewers or other conveyance systems
that cross property boundaries, existing or proposed, or whose discharge
crosses such boundaries shall contain a note stating the above.
(24)
Water quality inlets and/or bioretention areas. Storm drainage
systems that collect runoff from parking areas and/or loading areas
exceeding 10,000 square feet of impervious coverage and discharge
to stormwater management systems, including surface or subsurface
infiltration systems, shall have a minimum of one water quality inlet
or bioretention area per each acre of drainage area. The purpose of
water quality inlets is to remove oil, grease, and heavy particulates
or total suspended solids, hydrocarbons, and other floating substances
from stormwater runoff. Methods other than water quality inlets or
bioretention areas may be permitted if the applicant demonstrates
to the Town's satisfaction that any such alternative will be
as effective and as easily maintained. Periodic cleaning of these
systems shall be addressed in the operation and maintenance plan submitted
to the Town. All bioretention areas should be designed as per the
guidelines set forth in the PA Stormwater BMP Manual.
(g) Underground detention facilities.
(1)
Underground detention tanks shall utilize the largest practicable
pipe diameter in order to provide ease of access and maintenance.
(2)
Design measures must be implemented to prevent pipe flotation
and allow for visual inspection capabilities, adequate pipe ventilation,
and access maintenance.
(3)
Underground facilities shall be designed parallel to existing
and/or proposed contours.
(4)
The underground facilities shall be designed to include overflow
controls able to pass the unattenuated 100-year peak storm without
overtopping the access point.
(5)
A minimum forty-eight-inch diameter manhole with steps must
be provided at either end of the facility and at all terminal ends
and junctions for maintenance purposes. A minimum of two accesses
must be provided.
(6)
Maximum life expectancy of the underground system shall also
be a design consideration for pipe material specifications. The use
of corrugated metal pipe (CMP) for underground facilities proposed
for ownership and maintenance by the Town is prohibited.
(7)
For underground rock sumps, refer to Appendix F of this article.
(h) All other stormwater management BMPs not discussed as part of this
article shall adhere to the design requirements listed as part of
the PA Stormwater BMP Manual.
[Ord. No. 1528, 9-26-2022]
Stormwater management facilities shall be landscaped in accordance
with the following standards:
(a) Landscaping shall be required in and around all constructed stormwater
management facilities with a minimum surface area of 1,000 square
feet for the purposes of:
(1)
Assisting in the management of stormwater;
(2)
Stabilizing the soil within such facilities to minimize and
control erosion;
(3)
Enhancing the visual appearance of such facilities; and
(4)
Mitigating maintenance problems commonly associated with the
creation of such facilities.
(b) A planting plan and planting schedule shall be submitted in accordance
with the following:
(1)
Wet meadows, including floors of stormwater management facilities.
A.
Wet meadows and floors of stormwater management facilities shall
be planted with noninvasive plants native to western Pennsylvania,
such as wildflowers and noninvasive grasses, the intent being to create
a mixed meadow of such plantings, where appropriate. Selection of
plantings shall be based on whether the area in question is usually
well-drained or permanently wet and whether the area will be used
for recreation purposes. No woody plants shall be planted within the
saturated zone (phreatic line) of a stormwater management facility
or on a berm constructed for impounded water.
B.
Seeding by drills, corrugated rollers, cyclone or drop seeders
or hand-seeding of such areas is preferred; however, hydroseeding
followed by hydromulching can be used on wet ground and steep slopes.
C.
Fertilizers, as a nutrient supplement, shall not be used unless
it is documented that soil conditions warrant such use and the nutrient
applied does not exceed plant uptake. Soil for planting of wildflowers
shall contain not less than 3% nor more than 10% organic matter, as
determined by an agricultural chemist, with certification of the test
before planting.
D.
Seeding shall take place either between April 1 and May 15 or
between September 1 and October 15. Planting areas shall be soaked
to maintain a consistent level of moisture for at least four to six
weeks after planting. For seeding recommendations, reference the DEP's
E&S Pollution Control Program Manual.
E.
Once established, a single annual mowing when plants are dormant
should be sufficient to maintain a wet meadow and/or floor of a stormwater
management practice.
(2)
Wet edges that remain wet all or most of the year shall be planted
with wildflowers, grasses, and shrubs. Plants to be located on rims
or banks, which remain dry most of the year, shall be planted with
species tolerant of dry soil conditions.
(3)
Wooded areas.
A.
Where stormwater management facilities adjoin wooded areas,
trees and shrubs shall be selected and planted outside the practice
so as to blend with existing surroundings.
B.
Plantings in such areas shall be of sufficient density to eliminate
the need for mowing.
C.
It is recommended that clusters of trees and shrubs be planted
around stormwater management facilities but well away from outfalls
and any constructed berms, where applicable, to provide for wildlife
habitat, wind control and buffering and screening.
D.
Vegetation shall be planted during appropriate times of the
year, predominantly between late March and mid-May or from early October
until evidence of ground freezing, depending upon the species selected.
Most deciduous trees and shrubs can be planted in either spring or
fall. Evergreens are best planted in late summer or early fall.
(4)
Slopes.
A.
Where slopes are gentle, a mixture of meadow grasses and wildflowers
(for wet meadows) shall be planted.
B.
On steep slopes, as defined by the Town's Code of Ordinances,
dense spreading shrubs (shrubs tolerant of dry soils) shall be planted.
Heavy mat mulch shall be used during the period of establishment.
C.
No woody plant materials or trees shall be located on a constructed
or natural berm acting as the impoundment structure of a stormwater
management practice. Trees shall be located downstream of an impoundment
berm a sufficient distance from the toe of the constructed slope to
assure that the toe of the slope is outside the dripline of the species
planted at maturity but in no case less than 15 feet.
(5)
In cases where stormwater management facilities are to be located
in proximity to wetlands or waterways, the applicant's planting
plan and schedule shall consider the sensitive conditions existing
therein and be modified accordingly to reflect existing flora.
(6)
Stormwater management facilities shall be screened in a manner
which complements the existing landscape and provides sufficient access
for maintenance.
[Ord. No. 1528, 9-26-2022]
Stream buffers shall be provided as per the following requirements:
(a) A minimum stream buffer width of 50 feet landward in each direction
from the top of stream banks is required for all waterways having
both a defined bank and a contributing watershed area of greater than
100 acres.
(b) A minimum stream buffer width of 35 feet landward in each direction
from the center line of the waterway is required for smaller waterways
having a contributing watershed area of less than 100 acres and greater
than 10 acres.
(c) The stream buffer area should be maintained in a natural state.
(d) Trails in the buffer are permitted and are preferred to be permeable
and for nonmotorized use only. Impermeable trails are permitted, provided
that they have adequate drainage.
(e) Septic drain fields and sewage disposal systems shall not be permitted
within the riparian buffer easement and shall comply with setback
requirements established under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 73.
(f) Underground utilities shall be permitted within the riparian buffer
easement; however, work shall be performed to minimize disturbance
area and removal of trees. Restoration within the riparian buffer
easement shall be with native species of trees, grasses, and other
plantings. One tree shall be planted for each tree removed, and the
restoration shall be designed by a registered professional with the
requisite experience. Aboveground utilities shall only be permitted
to cross the easement perpendicular to the easement or in the shortest
practical distance. Existing utilities may remain and be maintained
as required.
(g) When wetland(s) extend beyond the edge of the required buffer width,
the buffer shall be adjusted so that the buffer consists of the extent
of the wetland plus a twenty-five-foot zone extending beyond the wetland
edge.
(h) Stream buffer averaging may be applied to account for encroachments,
such as road crossings. The following criteria must be met in order
to utilize buffer averaging on a development site:
(1)
All waterways with defined bed and banks must be mapped, and
the total waterway length on the property proposed for buffer averaging
must be calculated.
(2)
Buffer averaging is required for water quality buffers that
have stream crossings.
(3)
An overall average buffer width of at least 50 feet must be
achieved within the boundaries of the property to be developed. Stream
buffer corridors on adjoining properties cannot be included with buffer
averaging on a separate property, even if owned by the same property
owner.
(4)
The average width must be calculated based upon the entire length
of stream bank that is located within the boundaries of the property
to be developed. When calculating the buffer length, the natural stream
channel should be followed.
(5)
Stream buffer averaging shall be applied to each side of a stream
independently. If the property being developed encompasses both sides
of a stream, buffer averaging can be applied to both sides of the
stream but must be applied to both sides of the stream independently.
(6)
On each stream bank, the total width of the buffer shall not
be less than 25 feet at any location, except at approved stream crossings.
Those areas of the buffer having a minimum width of 25 feet (or less
at approved stream crossings) can comprise no more than 50% of the
buffer length.
(i) Stream buffer locations and widths should be illustrated on all subdivision
plans with notations requiring that they be maintained in a natural
state.
(j) Stream buffers should be illustrated on all grading and erosion and
sedimentation control plans. The defined stream buffer location should
be properly recorded. The recording should provide a plan illustrating
the stream buffer location, width and the requirement that it be maintained
in a natural state.