The purpose of this section is to provide
uniform procedures for the amendment of this chapter or the Official
Zoning Map by the Board of Aldermen whenever the public necessity,
convenience, general welfare or good zoning practice so requires.
|
Purpose: Conditional use permits are
authorized by RSA 674:21 II as an innovative land use control. Conditional
use permits are like special exceptions in that they require discretionary
public hearings for designated uses. Unlike special exceptions, the
decision maker is the Planning Board rather than the ZBA.
|
Purpose: Special exceptions are authorized
by RSA 674:33.IV. Special exceptions are like conditional uses in
that they require discretionary public hearings for designated uses.
Unlike conditional uses, the decision maker is the Zoning Board of
Adjustment rather than the Planning Board.
|
Purpose: The purpose of this section is to permit innovative land use controls, as authorized by RSA 674:21, in the timing of the Planning Board recommendation on a rezoning request and providing for the concurrent, conditional approval or disapproval of one or more site plans. A subdivision request shall accompany a site plan in any case in which a subdivision would be present. It is the intent of this section to provide for a streamlined review process that ensures quality, attractive, and compatible development in accordance with the general purposes of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the Master Plan. This section is intended to serve as an alternative procedure for seeking rezoning and is not intended to supersede § 190-132. This section implements the following Master Plan policies:
| |
•
|
Consider an amendment to the Nashua
City Code to allow incentive zoning in targeted areas (i.e., the City
would allow residential density in excess of that permitted in the
existing or underlying zoning, and require that a certain percentage
of additional units be affordable).
|
•
|
Consider a streamlined and creative
review and approval process for industrial uses.
|
Comment: See Boccia v. City of Portsmouth,
151 NH 85 (2004), Simplex Technologies v. Town of Newington, 145 N.H.
727, 731-32, 766 A. 2d 713 (2001).
|