Where a cash contribution or other financial
distribution is determined, the following criteria shall be utilized
in determining the proportionate share of such improvement to the
applicant:
A. Street widening, alignment, corrections, channelization
of intersections, construction of barriers, new or improved traffic
signalization, signs, curbs, sidewalks, trees, utility improvements
not covered elsewhere, the construction of new streets and other similar
street or traffic improvements. The applicant's proportionate cost
shall be in the ratio of the estimated peak hour traffic generated
by the proposed property or properties to the sum of the present deficiency
in peak-hour traffic capacity of the present facility and the estimated
peak-hour traffic generated by the proposed development. The ratio
thus calculated shall be increased by 10% for contingencies.
B. Water distribution facilities, including the installation
of new water mains, the extension of existing water mains, the relocation
of such facilities and the installation of other appurtenances associated
therewith. The applicant's proportionate cost shall be in the ratio
of the estimated daily use of water from the property or properties,
in gallons per day, for the existing system or subsystem and the estimated
use of water for the proposed development. The ratio thus calculated
shall be increased by 10% for contingencies.
C. Sanitary sewage distribution facilities, including
the installation, relocation or replacement of collector and interceptor
sewers and the installation, relocation or replacement of other appurtenances
associated therewith. The applicant's proportionate cost shall be
in the ratio of the estimated daily flow, in gallons, to the sum of
the present deficient capacity for the existing system or subsystem
and the estimated daily flow from the proposed project or development.
In the case where the peak flow from the proposed development may
occur during the peak flow period for the existing system, the ratio
shall be the estimated peak flow rate from the proposed development
in gallons per minute, to the sum of the present peak flow deficiency
in the existing system or subsystem and the estimated peak flow rate
from the proposed development. The greater of the two ratios thus
calculated shall be increased by 10% for contingencies and shall be
the ratio used to determine the cost to the applicant.
D. Stormwater and drainage improvements, including the
installation, relocation or replacement of transmission lines, culverts,
catch basins and the installation, relocation or replacement or other
appurtenances associated therewith. The applicant's proportionate
cost shall be in the ratio of the estimated peak surface runoff as
proposed to be delivered into the existing system, measured in cubic
feet per second, to the sum of the existing peak flow, in cubic feet
per second, deficient for the existing system and the estimated peak
flow as proposed to be delivered. The ratio thus calculated shall
be increased by 10% for contingencies.
E. General considerations. In calculating the proportionate
or pro-rata amount of the cost of any required off-tract facilities
which shall be borne by the applicant, the Board shall also determine
the pro-rata amount of cost to be borne by other owners of land which
will be benefited by the proposed improvements.