The Zoning Board of Appeals shall have the following
powers;
A. Administrative review. To hear and decide appeals
from and review any order, requirement, decision or determination
made by the Code Enforcement Officer or other administrative officer
in carrying out or enforcing any provision of this chapter. The concurring
vote of a majority of the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall
be necessary to reverse any order, requirement, decision or determination
of any administrative official or to decide in favor of the applicant
any matter upon which it is required to pass under any such ordinance.
B. Special use permits. To hear and decide applications for special use permits as specified in Article
X of this chapter and to authorize issuance of special use permits as specifically provided therein. A majority vote of the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be necessary to grant a special use permit.
C. Variances. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall have
the power, after public notice and hearing and in accordance with
the requirements of law and this chapter, to grant use variances and
area variances as those terms are defined herein. A majority vote
of the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be necessary to
grant a variance. Where an action is the subject of a referral to
the Yates County Planning Board, the voting provisions of § 239-m
of the General Municipal Law shall apply.
[Amended 12-9-1992 by L.L. No. 2-1992; 2-15-2012 by L.L. No.
1-2012]
[Added 2-15-2012 by L.L. No. 1-2012]
A. Use variances.
(1)
If a use variance is granted, the applicant shall obtain site
plan review approval from the Planning Board prior to commencing the
use and prior to obtaining a Building Permit.
(2)
No use variance shall be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals
without a showing by the applicant that otherwise applicable zoning
regulations and restrictions have caused unnecessary hardship.
(a)
Unnecessary hardship. In order to prove such unnecessary hardship
the applicant is required to demonstrate to the Zoning Board of Appeals
that, with respect to every permitted use under the zoning regulations
for the particular district where the property is located, each of
the following four criteria is satisfied:
[1] The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return
on the entire parcel of property, and such lack of return is substantial
as demonstrated by competent financial evidence;
[2] That the alleged hardship relating to the property
in question is unique, and does not apply to a substantial portion
of the district or neighborhood involved;
[3] That the requested use variance, if granted, will
not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and
[4] That the alleged hardship has not been self-created.
(b)
Reasonable rate of return. In evaluating whether the applicant
can realize a reasonable rate of return, the Zoning Board of Appeals
shall examine whether the entire original or expanded property holdings
of the applicant are incapable of producing a reasonable rate of return
(and not just the site of the proposed project). No use variance shall
be granted unless, in addition to satisfying all other applicable
provisions of law and this chapter, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds
that the applicant has clearly demonstrated, by detailed "dollar and
cents proof," the inability to obtain a reasonable return for the
entire parcel (and not just the site of the proposed project) and
for each and every permitted use in the district (including those
uses permitted by special use permit).
(c)
Unique hardship. No use variance shall be granted unless, in
addition to satisfying all other applicable provisions of law and
this chapter, the Zoning Board of Appeals finds that the entire parcel
of which the project is a part possesses unique characteristics that
distinguish it from other properties in the area.
(d)
Essential character of the neighborhood. In making its determination
of whether the proposed project will alter the essential character
of the neighborhood, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall take into account
factors that are of vital importance to the citizens of the Town including,
without limitation, the rural residential, agricultural and historic
character of the Town; its irreplaceable recreation and tourism sites;
the extent of hazard to life, limb or property may result from the
proposed project; health impacts; the social and economic impacts
of traffic congestion, noise, dust, odors, emissions, solid waste
generation and other nuisances; the impact on property values; and
whether the applicant will use a style of development that will result
in degradation to the air quality, water quality or scenic and natural
resources of the Town. In order to find that the proposed project
does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood, the Zoning
Board of Appeals shall interpret the public interest in said essential
character of the neighborhood to require, at a minimum, that the project
will not do any of the following:
[1] Pose a threat to the public safety, including public
health, water quality or air quality;
[2] Cause an extraordinary public expense; or
(e)
Self-created hardship. The Zoning Board of Appeals may find
that the applicant suffers from a self-created hardship in the event
that the Board finds that:
[1] The applicant's inability to obtain a reasonable
return on the property as a whole results from having paid too much
or from a poor investment decision;
[2] The applicant previously divided the property and
is left with only a portion which suffers from some unique condition
for which relief is sought and which did not apply to the parcel as
a whole; or
[3] When the applicant purchased the property, he or
she knew or should have known the property was subject to the zoning
restrictions.
(3)
In addition to the application requirements from time to time
established pursuant to law and this chapter, an application for any
use variance shall contain a typewritten narrative explaining what
the application is for, and how the project meets or exceeds all of
the criteria for a use variance, including:
(a)
Competent financial evidence. Competent financial evidence containing
reasonable specification of the nature and factual particulars of
such claim, and articulating the basis for the applicant's claim,
and including, at a minimum (as to the entire parcel of which the
proposed project is a part):
[3] Present value of the property;
[4] The amount of real estate taxes;
[5] The amount of mortgages or liens and other expenses;
[6] The asking price for the property when it had
been offered for sale;
[7] The costs of demolishing any existing structures
on the property;
[8] Cost of erecting a new building(s) for each and
every permitted use in the zoning district (including uses allowed
by special use permit);
[9] Efforts to market the property; and
[10] [10] A schedule of all other property in common
ownership at either the date of the enactment of this chapter or thereafter.
(b)
Competent financial evidence must include "dollars and cents
proof" such as appraisals, economic studies, and any other evidence
supporting the applicant's contention that the desired relief is appropriate,
including appraisals relating to any alleged diminution of all or
substantially all of the fair market value of property. For the purposes
hereof, common ownership means all other interests in property either
located within the Town or contiguous to the Town that is held by
the any of the applicants (if more than one), whether such ownership
is of a legal or equitable interest, in whole or in part, contiguous
or not, and whether such property interest is held by any of the applicants
through a legal or equitable interest in a(nother) corporation, partnership,
trust, business, entity, association, fund, joint venture, or individually.
(c)
Unique nature of the property. The applicant must provide evidence
demonstrating the unique nature of parcel as a whole. The fact that
the improvements already existing at the time of the application are
old, obsolete, outmoded or in disrepair or the fact that the property
is then unimproved shall not be deemed to make the plight of the property
unique or to contribute thereto. Exceptional topographic conditions
are an example of a factor demonstrating the unique nature of the
property.
(d)
Alteration of the essential character of the neighborhood. The
applicant must demonstrate that the proposed project will not change
the essential character of the neighborhood with regard to physical,
economic, social or environmental elements. Adverse impacts to the
essential character of the neighborhood include, but are not limited
to, decreased quality or increased quantity of stormwater runoff,
increased soil erosion, increased traffic congestion, decreased road
quality, impairment of the scenic or rural character of roads, increased
noise, dust, odor and/or glare, reduced wildlife habitat, decreased
air quality, decreased water quality, impairment of the viewshed,
creation of solid wastes, negative impacts on sustainability efforts,
increased social costs, increased emergency response times, negative
impacts to public infrastructure, decreased property values, and negative
impacts on the health of area residents.
(e)
Hardship not self-created. In order to show that the hardship
is not self-created, the applicant must demonstrate that either:
[1] When the property was purchased the zoning restrictions
from which a use variance is now sought were not in existence or did
not otherwise apply; or
[2] Some other change has occurred since the applicant's
purchase which makes the use nonconforming, as long as the change
was not caused by the applicant.
(4)
The Zoning Board of Appeals, in the granting of use variances,
shall grant only the minimum variance that it shall deem necessary
and adequate to allow an economically beneficial use of the property,
and at the same time preserve and protect the essential character
of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
(5)
The Zoning Board of Appeals, in the granting of use variances,
shall have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and
restrictions as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed
project. Such conditions shall be consistent with the spirit and intent
of this chapter, and shall be imposed for the purpose of minimizing
any adverse impact such use variance may have on the neighborhood
or community. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to,
landscaping, lighting, access and egress, signs, screening, architectural
features, location and layout of buildings, limitations upon the use
or characteristics of the use which are reasonably related to the
public health, safety and general welfare and as may be necessary
to carry out the intent of this chapter. If the applicant refuses
to accept such requirements and conditions, the use variance shall
be denied.
(6)
In addition to all other application requirements from time to time established pursuant to law and this chapter, the following reports shall be required to be submitted in connection with any appeal or application for a use variance concerning what is otherwise an explicitly prohibited use (as defined in §
160-141). The purpose of these reports in the context of otherwise explicitly prohibited uses is to assist the Zoning Board of Appeals in its determination as to the impact of a proposed project on the Town and/or the essential character of the neighborhood and/or to determine whether the proposed project complies with the requirements of this chapter:
(a)
Environmental Assessment Form. A completed draft of an Environmental
Assessment Form, Part I.
(b)
Description of surrounding uses. The approximate location of
all neighboring residential, hamlet, park, recreational, and agricultural
areas, as well as all county-designated unique natural areas and locally
designated open space, environmental, scenic, and historic areas,
and critical environmental areas (if any) within a two-mile radius
of the perimeter of the site of the proposed use.
(c)
Traffic impact report. A traffic impact report containing:
[1] The proposed traffic circulation plan, the projected
number of motor vehicle trips to enter or leave the site, estimated
for daily and peak hour traffic levels;
[2] Existing and proposed daily and peak traffic hour
levels as road capacity levels;
[3] A determination of the area of impact of traffic
to and from the proposed project;
[4] The proposed traffic routes to the nearest intersection
with an arterial highway, including gross weights and heights of vehicles;
[5] The projected traffic flow pattern including vehicular
movements at all major intersections likely to be affected by the
proposed project;
[6] The impact of this traffic upon existing abutting
public and private ways in relation to existing road capacities;
[7] A traffic impact analysis of the effects of the
proposed project on the transportation network in the Town using passenger
car equivalents;
[8] Articulation of the effects and impacts of the
proposed project on traffic based on existing conditions and projected
future background traffic on the state, county, and Town road system;
[9] Evaluation of whether the resulting traffic conditions
are likely to hinder the passage of police, fire and emergency response
vehicles, or degrade the quality of life, and/or otherwise contribute
to hazardous traffic conditions; and
[10] Determination of whether there is sufficient road
frontage so that any vehicle leaving the site may turn into the lane
of traffic moving in the desired direction and be channeled within
such lane before crossing the nearest intersection or proceeding along
the road and any vehicle entering the property may turn out of the
nearest lane of traffic without interfering with other traffic.
(d)
Road impact report. An evaluation of:
[1] Appropriate roadway geometry, including required
road widths, bridge widths, starting and stopping sight distances,
intersection sight distances, horizontal and vertical curves along
the proposed traffic routes;
[2] The adequacy of existing pavement structures along
the proposed traffic routes to accommodate the full weight load of
any high-impact trucks likely to be used in connection with the proposed
project; and
[3] Impacts to the rural or scenic character of any
roads along the proposed traffic route.
(e)
Transportation plan. A description of ingress and egress through
the proposed project site through which equipment and supplies will
be delivered and which will provide access during and after construction,
and identification of any roads, streets, intersections, bridges,
and other facilities along the proposed traffic route that do not
meet New York State Department of Transportation standards. Such plan
shall describe any anticipated improvements to existing roads, bridges,
or other infrastructure, any new road or access construction, measures
which will be taken to avoid damaging access/traffic routes and measures
that will be taken to restore damaged routes following construction,
and measures to maintain the scenic and/or rural characteristics of
such roads.
(f)
Noise impact report. A report on the following topics:
[1] The existing audible conditions at the project
site to identify a baseline sound presence and preexisting ambient
noise, including seasonal variation;
[2] A description and map of sound-producing features
of the proposed project from any noise-generating equipment and noise-generating
operations that will be conducted in connection with the proposed
project site, including noise impacts from truck traffic travelling
within the Town to and from the proposed project;
[3] For the noise generated by construction and use
of the proposed project, the range of noise levels and the tonal and
frequency characteristics expected, and the basis for the expectation;
[4] A description and map of the existing land uses
and structures including any sensitive sound receptors (i.e., residences,
hospitals, libraries, schools and places of worship, parks, areas
with outdoor workers) within one mile of the project parcel boundaries
(said description shall include the location of the structure/land
use, distances from the proposed project, and expected decibel readings
for each receptor);
[5] The report shall cover low-frequency, A-weighted,
infrasound, pure tone, and repetitive/impulse noise; and
[6] The report shall describe the project's proposed
noise-control features, including specific measures proposed to protect
workers and mitigate noise impacts for sensitive receptors.
(g)
Visual assessment. A visual presentation of how the site of
the proposed project will relate to and be compatible with the adjacent
and neighboring areas, within a two-mile radius of the perimeter of
the site of the proposed project. This presentation shall include
computerized photographic simulation showing the site during construction
and fully developed and demonstrating any visual impacts from strategic
vantage points. Color photographs of the proposed site from at least
two locations accurately depicting the existing conditions shall be
included. The study shall also indicate the color treatment of the
facility's components and any visual screening incorporated into the
project that is intended to lessen visual prominence.
(h)
Report of natural gas and/or petroleum extraction, exploration
or production wastes and other wastes. A report of:
[1] A description of natural gas and/or petroleum extraction, exploration or production wastes (as that term is defined at §
160-141) and other solid wastes, industrial wastes, hazardous wastes and pollutants expected to be produced, stored, injected, discarded, discharged, disposed, released, or maintained on the project site;
[2] A description of controls and practices to eliminate
or minimize release all such materials into the environment; and
[3] A plan for ultimate disposal of such materials
whether on or off-site.
(i)
Sustainability analysis. A discussion of:
[1] The extent of the use of nonrenewable resources
during the initial and continued phases of the proposed project;
[2] The expected duration of the initial and continued
phases of the proposed project; and
[3] The extent to which the proposed project may contribute
to an irreversible commitment to the continuation of this proposed
use by future generations.
(j)
Compatible uses report. A discussion of characteristics of the
proposed project that may decrease the Town's and/or the neighborhood's
suitability for other uses such as residential, commercial, historical,
cultural, tourism, recreational, environmental or scenic uses.
(k)
Fiscal impact assessment. An assessment describing the adverse
effects and impacts on Town revenue and costs necessitated by additional
public facility and service costs likely to be generated by the proposed
project.
(l)
Fire prevention, equipment failure and emergency response report.
A report containing:
[1] Description of the potential fire, equipment failures
and emergency scenarios associated the proposed project that may require
a response from fire, emergency medical services, police or other
emergency responders;
[2] An analysis of the worst-case disaster associated
with the proposed project and the impact of such a disaster upon the
health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the Town and their
property;
[3] Designation of the specific agencies that would
response to potential fires, equipment failures, accidents or other
emergencies;
[4] Description of all emergency response training
and equipment needed to response to a fire, accident, equipment failure
or other emergency, including an assessment of the training and equipment
available to local agencies; and
[5] The approximate or exact location of all fire,
police, and emergency response service facilities within a five-mile
radius of the perimeter of the site of the proposed use; and a detailed
fire control and pollution prevention and emergency response plan.
(m)
Public facilities and services assessment. An assessment describing:
[1] Whether current Town public facilities and services,
including water supply, fire protection, school services, recreation
facilities, police protection, roads and stormwater facilities, are
adequate for the proposed project (taking into account all other uses
that have been permitted or are currently operating in the Town);
[2] A comparison of the capacity of the public services
and facilities to the maximum projected demand that may result from
the proposed project (in determining the effect and impact of the
proposed project on fire, police, and emergency services, the review
shall take into consideration response times, and the number and location
of available apparatus and fire, police and emergency service stations
that are manned by full time professional service personnel; and where
applicable, calculation of response time shall also include the time
it takes volunteer emergency personnel to get to their stations);
and
[3] A review of the impact of the proposed project
on the safety of all children going to and from school by car, bus,
bicycle, and walking during and outside of school zone hours and whether
safety measures such as signaled cross walks, elevated sidewalks,
green space buffers for pedestrians/bikes where established walking/biking
route overlap/run along intended truck routes so as to prevent accidents.
(n)
Property value assessment. A property value analysis, prepared
by a licensed appraiser in accordance with industry standards, regarding
the potential impact of the project on the value of properties adjoining
the project site.
(o)
Health impact assessment. A human health impact assessment that
identifies ways in which the proposed project could adversely affect
the health of Town residents and a priority list of recommendations
to minimize the potential health impacts of the proposed project.
The health impact assessment shall include:
[1] A risk assessment of possible impact of chemical
exposure on the health of residents, including the chemical abstract
service number of all chemicals proposed to be used or generated at
the project site;
[2] An assessment of possible health effects due to
industrial operations in non-heavy-industrial zoned areas;
[3] An assessment of possible health effects due to
community changes including the presence of an industrial activity
in a previously non-heavy-industrial area, a perceived loss of shared
community ideals and cohesion, declining property values, impacts
to the education system and sudden changes in population numbers,
demographics and customs; and
[4] Proposed remedies to address principal findings.
(p) Impacted agency and utility recommendations. A written recommendation
from every "involved agency" and "interested agency," as those terms
are defined in 6 NYCRR 617.2(t) and (u), respectively, as amended,
and from every federal, state, county, Town and other agency, as well
as any utility, determined by the Zoning Board of Appeals to be affected
by the proposed project setting forth whether they support or do not
support the proposed project and their reasons therefor.
[Added 4-21-2021 by L.L.
No. 1-2021]
B. Area variances.
(1)
In making a determination whether to grant, grant conditionally,
or deny an application for an area variance, the Zoning Board of Appeals
shall take into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the
area variance is granted, and balance this benefit against the detriment
to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community
by making such grant. In making such determination the Board shall
consider each of the following factors: whether an undesirable change
will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment
to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance;
whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some
method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance;
whether the requested area variance is substantial; whether the proposed
area variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical
or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and whether
the alleged difficulty was self-created; which consideration shall
be relevant to the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals, but which
consideration shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area
variance.
(2)
The Zoning Board of Appeals, in the granting of area variances,
shall grant the minimum area variance that it shall deem necessary
and adequate and at the same time preserve and protect the character
of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community.
(3)
In addition to the application requirements from time to time
established pursuant to law and this chapter, applications for an
area variance shall contain a typewritten narrative explaining what
the application is for, and how the project meets or exceeds all of
the criteria for an area variance.
(4)
The Zoning Board of Appeals shall, in the granting of area variances,
have the authority to impose such reasonable conditions and restrictions
as are directly related to and incidental to the proposed use of the
property. Such conditions shall be consistent with the spirit and
intent of this chapter, and shall be imposed for the purpose of minimizing
any adverse impact such area variance may have on the neighborhood
or community. If the applicant refuses to accept such requirements
and conditions, the area variance shall be denied.
(5) In addition to the application requirements from time to time established
pursuant to law and this chapter, applications for an area variance
shall contain a written recommendation from every "involved agency"
and "interested agency," as those terms are defined in 6 NYCRR 617.2(t)
and (u), respectively, as amended, and from every federal, state,
county, Town and other agency, as well as any utility, determined
by the Zoning Board of Appeals to be affected by the proposed project
setting forth whether they support or do not support the requested
area variance and their reasons therefor.
[Added 4-21-2021 by L.L.
No. 1-2021]
In accordance with the policy and procedures
provided for by Chapter 24, Article 12-B, § 239-l and § 239
of the General Municipal Law, any special use permit or variance affecting real property
lying within a distance of 500 feet of any boundary of the Town of
Jerusalem or from the boundary of any existing or proposed county
or state park or other recreational area; or from the right-of-way
of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, throughway, expressway,
road or highway; or from the existing or proposed right-of-way of
any stream or drainage channel lines; or from the existing or proposed
boundary line of any county- or state-owned land in which a public
building or institution is situated shall be referred to the Yates
County Planning Board. The term "proposed" shall be deemed to include
only those recreation areas, parkways, throughways, expressways, roads
or highways which are shown on a county plan of Yates County adopted
pursuant to § 239-d, Subdivision 2, of the General Municipal
Law. If the Yates County Planning Board fails to report within 30
days after receipt of a full statement of such referred material,
the Zoning Board of Appeals may act without such report. If the Yates
County Planning Board disapproves of the proposal or recommends modifications
thereof, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall not act contrary to such
disapproval or recommendations, except by a vote of a majority plus
one of all members thereof and after the adoption of a resolution
setting forth the reason for the contrary action.
[Amended 1-8-2003 by L.L. No. 1-2003]
A. Who may appeal. An appeal to the Zoning Board of Appeals
for administrative review or variance may be taken by any person,
firm or corporation aggrieved or by any governmental officer, department,
board or bureau affected by any decision of the Code Enforcement Officer,
based in whole or in part upon the provisions of this chapter. Such
an appeal shall be taken by filing with the Zoning Board of Appeals
a notice of appeal, specifying the grounds thereof. The Code Enforcement
Officer shall forthwith transmit to the Zoning Board of Appeals all
papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed from
was taken.
B. Time of appeal. Said notice of appeal shall be filed
within 60 days from the date upon which the notice of refusal of a
building permit or refusal of a certificate of occupancy is mailed
by the Code Enforcement Officer, and failure to file notice of appeal
within 60 days shall constitute a waiver of the right of appeal.
C. Stay of proceedings. An appeal stays all proceedings
in furtherance of the action appealed from, unless the Code Enforcement
Officer from whom the appeal is taken certifies to the Zoning Board
of Appeals, after the notice of appeal shall have been filed with
him, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate a stay would,
in his opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property, in which
case proceedings shall not be stayed otherwise than by a restraining
order, which may be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals or by a
court of record, on application, a notice to the Code Enforcement
Officer, and on due cause shown.
If the variance is granted or the issuance of a permit is finally approved, or other action by the appellant or applicant is authorized, the necessary permits shall be subject to the terms of §
160-65F. Should the appellant or applicant fail to comply with these provisions, it shall be conclusively presumed that the applicant or appellant has waived, withdrawn or abandoned his appeal or his application, and such permissions, variances and permits to him granted shall be deemed automatically rescinded by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Any person or person jointly or severally aggrieved
by any decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals or of any officer,
department, board or bureau of the Town, may apply to the Supreme
Court for relief by a proceeding under Article 78 of the Civil Practice
Law and Rules, and:
A. It must be instituted within 30 days after the filing
of a decision in the office of the Town Clerk.
B. The Court may take evidence or appoint a referee to
take such evidence as it may direct, and report the same, with its
findings of fact and conclusions of law, if it shall appear that testimony
is necessary for the proper disposition of the matter.
C. The Court, at Special Term, shall itself dispose of
the causes on the merits, determining all questions which may be presented
for determination.