Commentary: The Charter requirements with regard to the form of the operating budget as set forth in § C1202C do not include the line-by-line system which is currently employed. It was the GSC's view that the Charter should require only a minimum classification of the budget by department and that the Board will determine from time to time whether it desires a line-by-line budget by type of expenditures as is currently utilized or a line-by-line budget by program within each department.
|
BUDGET PROCEDURE
|
Commentary: As is provided in § C602, the budget message described in this section and the financial plan described in the following § C1204 may be prepared with the assistance of the township administration staff but must reflect the personal evaluations, recommendations and statement of priorities of the President of the Board. The budget message is particularly the document of the Board President.
|
Commentary: The financial plan includes
the proposed operating and capital budgets and also the various schedules
and figures and projections which are necessary for the Board and
its committees to make a proper evaluation of these proposed budgets.
In general, the items required are the ones which are now customarily
supplied.
| |
| |
The changes from current procedure which this section contemplates include the submission of a proposed forecast of revenue and expenditures for at least two (2) additional years in general terms [see § C1204A(3)] and the adoption of a capital budget at the same time as the adoption of the operating budget, rather than at a separate time as is the current practice. With regard to the two-year forecast projection of operating budget, it is not expected that any attempt will be made to forecast with any definitive accuracy the likely inflationary or salary increases; it is rather the purpose of this projection to indicate areas in which a shift of priorities or the deletion or addition of programs is suggested in terms of current dollars. Thus, as the GSC views it, it would be satisfactory to set forth such items as salaries and material costs in current dollars for the purpose of projection.
| |
| |
The GSC contemplates that the requirements that the
Board may impose on the President regarding the form of the proposed
operating budget and capital program to be submitted by him may be
different and less detailed than the form in which the Board will
ultimately adopt the operating and capital budgets. Thus, the Board
might not require the President to set forth the salary levels for
employees while it would undoubtedly set forth such salary levels
in its ultimately adopted operating budget.
|
Commentary: The procedure for the
adoption of the budget is in many respects similar to that traditionally
employed by the Board of Commissioners, except that it is contemplated
that the review by the individual committees of the Board and its
Finance Committee will occur following submission of the proposed
budget by the President, rather than representing the initiation of
the budget process.
| |
| |
It is the GSC's view that the President's
submission should occur at least ninety (90) days prior to the end
of the fiscal year so as to provide adequate time for review by the
departmental committees and the Finance Committee prior to the promulgation
of the preliminary budget. In deference to the concern of some members
of the Board of Commissioners that there would not be sufficient financial
experience in the current fiscal year to permit meaningful budget
making, the Charter requirement is set at fifty (50) days.
| |
| |
Commentary: The Charter provision makes possible the transfer during the course of a year within a department by administrative directive and, although requiring an ordinance for transfer between departments, it adopts the emergency ordinance procedure which eliminates the requirement of prior advertising otherwise applicable with respect to emergency appropriations or transfers. With regard to supplemental appropriations, preadvertising and an opportunity for the public to speak to the issue is required pursuant to Article V but the formal public hearing required in connection with the adoption of the budget is not required.
|
CONTRACTS
|
Commentary: The provisions of § C1207A limiting contracts as to future years with regard to both amount and duration represent an attempt by the GSC to avoid the possibility that a particular Board will bind future Boards by obligating the township in areas where no such obligations are in fact legitimately required.
| |
| |
The permission granted to the Board in § C1207D to increase the amount of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.) for exemption from competitive bidding, written contract, signatures and Board approval requirements, provides a method for adjustment because of changing inflationary levels. It is not contemplated that the Board will increase the limit of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.) except to reflect increases in the cost of living.
| |
| |
The exceptions from the competitive bidding requirement as enumerated in § C1207C are, in general, currently applicable under the Township Code, Section 1802.[3] Somewhat special provisions are here included for the exemption from the competitive bidding requirement of items available from only one (1) vendor [see § C1207C(2)], lease or sale of township real property, provided that independent appraisals are obtained to assure adequate compensation is being received [see § C1207C(4)] and contracts pursuant to joint purchasing arrangements provided that one (1) of the participating units followed competitive bidding procedures where they would have been required pursuant to this Charter [see § C1207C(10)].
|
FINANCIAL LIMITATIONS
|
Commentary: In general, the Charter
does not enlarge the taxing ability or the borrowing ability of Cheltenham's
Board of Commissioners. It does eliminate the current requirement
that the Board petition the court for some part of its real estate
taxing authority, substituting for that requirement the necessity
that the change be made by an absolute two-thirds vote of the Board.
In essence, this provision provides a greater guaranty against the
use of the additional taxing authority since it is more difficult
to obtain an absolute two-thirds vote under the Charter than it is
currently to obtain a mere majority vote of the quorum of the Board
in attendance at a meeting in order to authorize the application to
a court and the fairly routine approval which normally results thereafter.
The provision permitting the Board to shift to general purposes taxing
authority made available only for special purposes under the First
Class Township Code, upon approval of an absolute two-thirds vote
of the Board, provides greater protection that the Board will not
fully utilize specific taxing authority for the purpose specified
in situations where it would prefer to utilize a portion of that taxing
authority for items of greater priority.
| |
| |
As the text makes clear, the borrowing limitations
are precisely those already applicable to the township pursuant to
the Local Government Unit Debt Act of 1972.
|
Commentary: The purpose of this provision
is to assure the continual appropriate funding of any township pension
plan. The requirement of actuarial soundness does not, of course,
require the plan to be fully funded at all times since in any situation
in which benefits are significantly increased there inevitably will
be a back-funding requirement. Actuarial soundness requires that this
back-funding be provided in a reasonable period of time as recommended
by an actuary.
|