[§ 1, L.L. No.
3-2017]
There shall be a bureau within the
Department of Finance known as the Traffic Violations Agency which
shall operate under the direction and control of the Mayor. The Traffic
Violations Agency shall assist the Rochester City Court in the disposition
and administration of infractions of traffic laws, ordinances, rules
and regulations, except that said Agency shall not have jurisdiction
over those matters which are specifically excluded by Subdivision
2-b of § 371 of the General Municipal Law of the State of
New York. The Agency shall be subject to the provisions of Article
14-B of the General Municipal Law.
[§ 1, L.L. No.
3-2017]
Subject to the provisions of § 1690
of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of New York and notwithstanding
any other provision of law, where the trial of a traffic infraction
is authorized or required to be tried before the City Court, and such
traffic infraction does not constitute a misdemeanor, felony, or any
parking, stopping, standing or pedestrian offense, or any infraction
excluded by Subdivision 1-b of § 1690 of the Vehicle and
Traffic Law, the Administrative Judge of the Seventh Judicial District
may without the consent of the parties assign judicial hearing officers
to conduct such a trial.
[§ 1, L.L. No.
3-2017]
Subject to the provisions of § 371
of the General Municipal Law, and notwithstanding any inconsistent
provision of law, the fines, penalties and forfeitures collected by
the Agency shall be distributed as provided in Subdivision 4-b of
§ 371 of the General Municipal Law.
[§ 1, L.L. No.
3-2017]
Notwithstanding that the Agency is
authorized to commence operations not sooner than 270 days after July
25, 2017, the provisions of this part shall apply to all actions on
or after the effective date of this Part and to all actions otherwise
taken heretofore related to the establishment, maintenance and operation
of the Agency. Insofar as the provisions of this Part are inconsistent
with the provisions of any other local law or act, the provisions
of this Part shall be controlling.
[§ 1, L.L. No.
3-2017]
If any clause, sentence, paragraph,
subdivision, section or provision of this Part or the application
thereof to any person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership,
entity, or circumstance, shall be adjudged by any court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such order or judgment
shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder thereof, but
shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph,
subdivision, section or part of this Part, or in its application to
the person, individual, corporation, firm, partnership, entity, or
circumstance, directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment
or order shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the
intent of the City Council that this Part would have been enacted
even if such invalid provisions had not been included herein.