A. 
The examination for police officer will consist of a written and an oral examination which will be graded on a 100 point scale with the written examination representing 70% of the final score and the oral examination representing 30% of the final score. In addition, each applicant will undergo a physical agility test, a polygraph test and a background investigation. These tests and investigation will be graded on a pass/fail basis for every applicant. In order to proceed to the next step in the hiring process, an applicant must have satisfied the requirements for passing the previous step. Any applicant who fails any pass/fail portion of the process or fails to obtain the required minimum score and/or ranking on the oral or written examinations shall be removed from further consideration in the hiring process. After an applicant has been extended a conditional offer of employment, final appointment shall be contingent upon the applicant successfully passing a medical and psychological examination.
B. 
Sequence for exams.
(1) 
The sequence for the above exams/investigation shall be as follows:
(a) 
Written examination;
(b) 
Physical agility test;
(c) 
Oral examination;
(d) 
Polygraph test; and
(e) 
Background examination.
(2) 
Prior to the start of a new hiring process which will culminate in a new eligibility list, the Commission may change the sequence for the exams by resolution with the approval of a majority of Borough Council.
The examination for the position of Sergeant shall include a written and an oral examination which will be graded on a one-hundred-point scale with the written examination representing 70% of the final score and the oral examination representing 30% of the final score.
The Commission shall appoint a written examination administrator, an oral examination administrator, a polygraph examiner, a physical agility examiner, a medical examiner and a psychological examiner to conduct the appropriate examination required by these rules. With respect to any of the above administrators, the "administrator" may consist of a committee of individuals.
The written examination shall be graded on a one-hundred-point scale, and an applicant must score 70% or higher and receive one of the top 25 highest scores, including ties, in order to pass and to continue in the application process. Applicants scoring less than 70% or not receiving one of the top 25 highest scores shall be removed from further consideration in the hiring process. Within 30 days after the administration of the written examination, all applicants shall be given written notice of their test results, and each passing applicant shall be informed of the next step in the examination process.
Every applicant who scored 70% or higher and receives one of the top 25 highest scores, including ties in the written examination, and successfully passes the physical agility examination, shall be given an oral examination that will be graded on a one-hundred-point scale with a score of 70% or higher necessary to pass the oral examination. The oral examination shall involve questioning applicants on how they would handle situations relevant to police work. Within 30 days after the applicants' oral examination, they shall be informed of their oral examination and total overall scores, and each passing applicant shall be informed of the next step in the examination process.
Pursuant to the Veterans' Preference Act,[1] any applicant for the position of police officer who qualifies as a "soldier" under this Act, shall receive an additional 10 points on top of their total score if that applicant had received passing scores under §§ 8-25, 8-28 and 8-29 and also passed the physical agility test, the polygraph examination and the background check required by these rules. Any applicant claiming veterans' preference is responsible for providing any and all relevant documents to the Commission.
[1]
Editor's Note: See 51 Pa.C.S.A. § 7101 et seq.
A. 
Every applicant for the position of police officer shall fill out a personal data questionnaire and undergo a polygraph examination. The Commission shall furnish each polygraph examiner with forms upon which the examiner shall state whether any of the applicant's responses to questions from the applicant's personal data questionnaire are deceptive. The report on each examination shall be submitted to the Commission within five days after the date of the examination.
B. 
The examiner shall ask questions based on the information contained in the personal data questionnaire. Before administering the test, the examiner shall ask each applicant whether there is any more information related to the personal data questionnaire which the applicant would like to provide. There shall also be a post-test review, during which the examiner shall again ask the participant, if deception is indicated, whether there is any information which the applicant is withholding.
C. 
If the examiner shall deem any of the applicant's responses to be deceptive, the examiner must tell the applicant immediately and give the applicant an opportunity to explain, deny or admit the deception. If the applicant denies being deceptive or if the explanation is found unsatisfactory by the examiner, the applicant will be given the opportunity to retake the test with a second examiner. Notice of the opportunity to retest shall be given, in writing, to the applicant. The second examiner will not have access to the results of the first test prior to readministering the polygraph. If the second examiner finds no deception, the applicant will be considered as having passed the polygraph. If the second examiner also finds the applicant deceptive, the applicant will be considered as having failed the examination.
D. 
An applicant who has failed both tests may appeal to the Civil Service Commission for a third examination, and the decision to give the applicant an opportunity to take a third test resides solely within the discretion of the Commission. If the applicant is awarded an opportunity to take a third test and passes, then the applicant will be considered as having passed the polygraph test. If the applicant is found deceptive on a third test, the applicant will be rejected.
An applicant for the position of police officer must successfully complete a physical agility test which is approved by the Commission utilizing any recommendation of the Borough's Chief of Police. Such test shall be designed to test physical agility components involved in the performance of the essential duties of a Borough police officer.
A. 
The background investigation may be conducted on and restricted to candidates on the eligibility list or those candidates to be certified to Borough Council for possible appointment. The Commission shall request the Chief of Police or the Chief's designee to conduct a background investigation on each eligible applicant on the eligibility list or to be certified to Borough Council for possible appointment. The background investigation shall include interviews with the applicant's family, acquaintances, current and former employers, current and former neighbors, references and current and former teachers and school officials. At a minimum, personal interviews shall be conducted with at least three people that have personal knowledge of the applicant but who are not related to the applicant and with the applicant's employer(s) for the past five years. The background investigation shall also include a criminal history check, including the submission of fingerprints to the Central Repository for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The applicant's credit history and record of criminal convictions shall also be investigated, as well as the applicant's driving record for verification that he possesses a valid driver's license. The applicant may be interviewed directly when the information collected during the background investigation requires clarification or explanation.
B. 
If necessary to complete a thorough background investigation on any applicant, the Commission may, upon the request of the Chief of Police or his designee, subpoena the personnel records maintained by any other police department(s) by which the applicant was previously employed.
C. 
After the background investigation is completed, the Chief of Police, or designee, shall make a written recommendation to the Commission on whether the applicant is appropriate for consideration for appointment as a police officer. Appropriateness of the applicant shall be based on the criteria set forth in § 8-19 of these rules. This recommendation shall be in writing and, if the recommendation is to disqualify, then a written explanation of the reasons for disqualification must be included. The Commission shall make the final determination on whether the information collected during the background investigation warrants rejection of the candidate. Within 30 days after the Commission considers the recommendation of the Chief of Police or designee, each applicant will be informed of whether they have passed the background investigation.