The sovereign, including any state or local government, is, by its
historical nature, vested with the ancient power and authority to
take private property for public use. That power and authority is
traditionally and commonly called the "power of eminent domain." As
a limitation on that power and authority, the Fifth Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States provides, in part, that private
property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.
Article 1, Section 7, of the New York State Constitution likewise
provides, in part, that private property shall not be taken for public
use without just compensation. The Eminent Domain Procedure Law of
the State of New York sets forth the process and procedure by which
a local government may take private property for a public use and
for just compensation. Case law, on both the federal and state levels,
has addressed the issue, in varying circumstances, of what constitutes
a public use. Generally accepted public uses include the use of property
for municipal buildings, parks and other public spaces, public works
facilities, municipal parking lots, roads and the development of public
utilities. The Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of
Kelo et al. v. the City of New London, et al. has held that the taking
of private property for economic development is a legitimate public
use for the exercise, by a municipality, of the power of eminent domain.
The Supreme Court in Kelo also said, though, that nothing in that
opinion precludes any state, and logically, therefore, any municipal
subdivision of a state, from placing further restrictions on its exercise
of the takings power.