This document, subject to revision from time to time in a manner
spelled out within, constitutes the current fee schedule and those
rules governing the imposition of fees.
A. In the past, fees imposed for the consideration of various types
of applications have been approximations of cost of processing those
applications. These new regulations and fees are designed to produce,
as much as possible, a more equitable schedule of fees which more
accurately reflects the costs of review.
B. In late 1989, the state enacted legislation [This act was approved on December 8, 1989 and became effective on March 8, 1990. The Act, Chapter 593 of the Acts of 1989, insets a new section 53G in M.G.L. Chapter
44. A copy of the legislation is available from the Planning Board office] authorizing towns to establish special accounts, hereafter referred to as "593 accounts," to pay for the employment of outside consultants under the Subdivision Control Law or Georgetown Zoning Bylaws. Fees charged to applicants specifically to pay outside consultants are to be deposited into these 593 Accounts by the Town Treasurer. The Planning Board may then expend the funds, without Town Meeting appropriation, in connection with the employment of these consultants. With the addition of this new structure, the Planning Board is able to create a more exact method of assessing fees.
The Planning Board shall impose reasonable fees for the review of applications that come before it. One or both of the following fee structures (§
353-3, Administrative fees, and §
353-4, Project review fees) may apply to various types of applications.
In addition to an administrative fee, which the Planning Board
has traditionally imposed, a new second type of fee, referred to herein
as the "project review fee," is now possible. This fee is to be deposited
into a special account as enabled by MGL c. 44, § 53G, referred
to herein as the "593 Account." This fee shall be imposed on those
applications which, as designated by the Planning Board, require the
services of outside consultants for the review process due to the
size, scale or complexity of a proposed project, because of a project's
potential impacts, or because the Town lacks the necessary expertise
to perform the review work related to the permit or approval. In hiring
outside consultants, the Board may engage engineers, planners, lawyers,
designers or other appropriate professionals who can assist the Board
in analyzing a project to ensure compliance with all relevant laws,
ordinances, bylaws and regulations. Such assistance may include, but
not be limited to, analyzing an application, monitoring or inspecting
a project or site for compliance with the Board's decisions or
regulations, or inspecting a project during construction or implementation.
A. Moneys shall be collected from the applicant and deposited into the
593 Account upon submission of the application.
B. Outside consultants retained by the Planning Board to assist in the
review of an application shall be paid from this account.
C. The Planning Board shall determine the amount of initial deposit to be made as put forth in the accompanying schedule, and the amount of any additional funds required during the process, should the applicant's 593 Account approach depletion. Such determinations shall be consistent with the requirements of §
353-9B.
D. Failure of an applicant to pay a review fee shall be grounds for
denial of the application.
E. Any excess amount attributable to a particular project, including
accrued interest, will be repaid to the applicant, or the applicant's
successor in interest, at the conclusion of the review process. For
the purpose of this regulation, any person or entity claiming to be
an applicant's successor in interest shall provide the Board
with documentation establishing such succession in interest.
F. Should it become apparent to the Planning Board that an application
requires the services of outside consultants for proper review, the
Board may require the imposition of this second type of fee, even
if it is not normally part of the review process for that type of
application, and providing that said imposition is in compliance with
the state enabling legislation.
When more than one type of application is being sought at the
same time (for the same project), only the highest of the applicable
project review fees shall be collected for initial deposit into the
593 Account, and not the sum of those fees.
A. Initial deposits. The following project review fees for the indicated
application types are to be submitted with their initial applications.
These fees are good faith estimates of cost of review but may be modified
at the sole discretion of the Planning Board as warranted by a particular
project.
(1) A preliminary plan, modification of a preliminary plan, modification
of a definitive plan, or modification of a special permit shall require
the following initial project review fee:
|
Project Size
(lots/units)
|
Fee
|
---|
|
2 to 15
|
$2,000
|
|
16 to 20
|
$3,000
|
|
21 to 25
|
$4,000
|
|
More than 25
|
$5,000
|
(2) A definitive plan shall require the following initial project review
fee:
|
Project Size
(lots/units)
|
Fee
|
---|
|
2 to 15
|
$4,000
|
|
16 to 20
|
$6,000
|
|
21 to 25
|
$10,000
|
|
More than 25
|
$12,000
|
(3) A special permit shall require a minimum of $2,000 for the initial
project review fee. Depending on the complexity of issues presented,
additional fees may be required.
(4) Site plan approval permit shall require the following initial project
review fees:
|
Project Size
(square feet of additional floor area)
|
Fee
|
---|
|
Less than 10,000
|
$2,000
|
|
10,000 to 30,000
|
$3,000
|
|
30,000 to 50,000
|
$4,000
|
|
More than 50,000
|
$5,000
|
(5) Fees for major and complex projects. A site plan review special permit
fee may also be assessed for major development review projects or
projects which in the opinion of the Board are likely to require substantial
outside technical and/or legal assistance due to factors such as the
novelty and technical complexity of the project; the potential for
adverse impacts; the need for close scrutiny of the project; and the
size and scope of the project. The Board, by majority vote, may assess
a fee of up to $50,000 for such major and complex projects. Notwithstanding
any provision in these regulations to the contrary, any unused portion
of the fee assessed for major and complex projects shall be refundable
to the applicant at the time the decision is made on the application.
B. Exemptions from initial deposits. Form A applications, applications for common driveways, and access other than over the legal frontage require the submission of a project review fee with the initial application. The Planning Board may consider at the first review session, or at any subsequent review session, whether such a fee is warranted, and if so, the amount of the fee may, by vote of the Board, be waived in part or in whole. Such flexibility is necessary because the wide range of scope and scale to such applications makes it difficult to calculate an equitable project review fee without consideration of the project on a case-by-case basis. In addition to those application types listed here, any other type of application not specifically listed in Subsection
A above shall be subject to the provisions §
353-4.
C. Subsequent deposits. When the balance in an Applicant's 593 Account falls below 50% of the initial project review fee, as imposed under Subsection
A above or §
353-4, the Planning Board shall consider whether to require a supplemental project review fee to cover the remaining project review and the attendant costs still to come. The Board may also choose to set a different threshold (other than 25% of the initial deposit) to trigger a reconsideration of the issue.
D. Inspection phase of projects. After the granting of a special permit,
a definitive plan approval, or any permit or approval which will culminate
in construction requiring inspections by Planning Board consultants,
the Board may wish to make an adjustment in the funds held in an applicant's
593 Account.
(1) The 593 Account may be adjusted by issuing a refund to the applicant
or by requiring a supplemental project review fee.
(2) Adjustments should be made after all bills for review services have
been accounted for.
(3) The following levels are suggested for the Board's consideration:
(a)
All projects (other than those covered below):
|
Project Size
(lots/units)
|
593 Account Level
|
---|
|
2
|
$2,000
|
|
3 to 5
|
$3,000
|
|
6 to 15
|
$5,000
|
|
16 to 20
|
$6,000
|
|
21 to 25
|
$8,000
|
|
More than 25
|
$10,000
|
(b)
Special permits/site plan approval: $2,000.
(4) The Planning Board has the right to require supplemental project review fees if the applicant's 593 Account approaches depletion during the inspection phase of the review process. Such findings of the Board, while subject to the provisions of §
353-9B do not require a formal hearing or prior notice to interested parties.
E. Dormant projects. When an applicant knows that there will be no construction
activity on a project for at least one year after the permitting process,
the applicant may ask the Board for a declaration of "dormant" status
with the following conditions:
(1) The level of funds in the 593 Account will be adjusted to $500, after
all outstanding bills for review services have been accounted for.
(2) The applicant must submit the appropriate project review fee to bring
the 593 Account back to the designated level for an active project
before any work may be done on the site.
(a)
The 593 Account must be restored before the first inspection.
(b)
No building permits or lot releases will be granted until the
Board is satisfied that all conditions of these provisions have been
complied with.
(3) The Planning Board may declare that a project no longer qualifies
for "dormant" status, if, in the Board's opinion, circumstances
render that status inappropriate.
(4) A project brought out of "dormant" status, or a project which in
the opinion of the Planning Board no longer qualifies for "dormant"
status, which has not remained dormant for at least one year shall
be subject to a processing fee of $50.
(5) Funds in the 593 Account for "dormant" projects may, at the original applicant's discretion, be assigned to a new owner or successor in interest, in the event of a sale or transfer of the land and permits. Appropriate documentation must be provided to the Planning Board establishing the authorization for the reassignment of the 593 Account. (This provision is consistent with §
353-4E, which applies to returned funds at the conclusion of a project.)
The Board shall be required to make decisions, from time to
about fees and about moneys held in the 593 Account. The following
rules shall apply:
A. Any practices which evolve whereby the Board exempts or reduces fees
in a given, definable situation, not spelled out in these regulations,
requires the following:
(1) Such practices, once recognized, must be applied uniformly to the
extent practical and possible.
(2) Such practices should be reviewed during the annual review hearing
or sooner to see if they can be codified and incorporated into these
regulations.
B. The following decisions require Board participation:
(1) Decisions about individual applications require motions affirmed
by a majority of those present in order to carry, but in no case fewer
than three affirmative votes.
(2) Decisions concerning revisions in the regulations or the fee schedules
require motions affirmed by a majority of those holding office at
the time of the vote regardless of the number of members in attendance
during the vote.
The following rules apply to fees owed to the Planning Board
by applicants:
A. All fees past due by one month from the date of invoice shall be
subject to a monthly charge based upon an annual interest rate of
14%.
B. All costs of collection associated with past due accounts shall be
borne by the applicant.
C. All applicants owing fees to the Planning Board at the time of any
amendment to these provisions of the regulations shall be sent the
following:
(1) A duplicate notice of the amount past due.
(2) A copy of these Fee Regulations.
(3) Notice of a thirty-day grace period before the commencement of any
changes in interest rates or charges.
(4) A stop-work order may be placed on any projects with an outstanding
balance.