[Amended 6-17-2003 by Ord. No. 2003-183; 7-27-2004 by Ord. No. 2004-240; 12-20-2005 by Ord. No. 2005-394; 2-14-2006 by Ord. No. 2006-22; 11-25-2008 by Ord. No. 2008-384; 6-16-2009 by Ord. No. 2009-179; 12-15-2009 by Ord. No. 2009-409; 9-21-2010 by Ord. No. 2010-323; 7-19-2011 by Ord. No. 2011-247; 9-19-2012 by Ord. No.
2012-363; 7-14-2015 by Ord. No. 2015-228; 6-20-2017 by Ord. No. 2017-170]
A. Administrative adjustment.
(1) Authority. The Manager of Zoning, or a designee, shall
have authority to issue administrative adjustments, but only in accordance
with the provisions of this section.
(2) Purpose. For purposes of this section, carrying out
the strict letter of a provision of this chapter may cause a practical
difficulty and an administrative adjustment is permitted to alleviate
these practical difficulties.
(3) Administrative adjustment standards. To approve an
application for an administrative adjustment, the Manager of Zoning
shall make an affirmative finding that the following standards are
met:
(a)
The benefits to the applicant of the approval
of the administrative adjustment outweigh any detriments to the health,
safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such approval.
(b)
There is no means other than the requested administrative
adjustment by which the difficulty can be avoided or remedied to a
degree sufficient to permit a reasonable use of the subject lot or
parcel.
(4) Procedures.
(a)
Application. An application for an administrative
adjustment shall include a brief description of the requirement to
be varied and any other material necessary to ensure the criteria
in this section.
(b)
Action by Manager of Zoning. Within 45 days,
the Manager of Zoning shall review the application and approve, approve
with conditions or deny the application based upon the criteria below.
A written decision including affirmative findings on the criteria
set forth below shall be mailed to the applicant.
(c)
Approval or denial.
[1]
The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority to approve an administrative adjustment of up to 10% from any numerical standard set forth in this chapter. Any request greater than 10% shall be treated as a variance and reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals subject to the requirements of §
120-195.
[2]
The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority
to approve an administrative adjustment for an alternative parking
plan for five or fewer parking spaces.
[3]
The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority
to approve an administrative adjustment for a parking area for a residential
use which is located within the side yard due to the existing location
of the principal building on the property; or is within the front
yard and is limited to one parking space, when new curbs are being
installed and the parking area existed before the project was identified
in the City's Capital Plan and no other parking is available on the
property.
[a] A proposed front or side yard parking
area shall be reviewed to ensure that the installation of said area
does not have a detrimental impact on the streetscape. Such review
shall include an evaluation of the following:
[i] Neighborhood characteristics, based
both on a physical evaluation of the streetscape and comments received
from the neighborhood.
[ii] Impact on available on-street
parking.
[iii] Impact on trees and other vegetation.
[iv] Impact on the historic and/or
architectural integrity of the streetscape.
[b] When located in a preservation district, the Preservation Board shall have the authority to issue a certificate of appropriateness for front or side yard parking areas as outlined in §
120-194. In such cases no administrative adjustment shall be required. The Preservation Board shall apply the above-listed standards.
[4]
The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority
to approve an administrative adjustment for a parking area or parking
lot for commercial uses in a commercial district which:
[a] Has a preexisting curb cut; and
[b] Has insufficient space behind the
building to accommodate required parking when new curbs are being
installed and the parking lot or parking area existed before the project
was identified in the City's Capital Plan; and
[c] Can accommodate a parking stall
length of 18 feet; and
[d] Accommodates defined pedestrian
access to the building.
[e] Does not have a detrimental impact on the streetscape according to the evaluation criteria set forth in §
120-191A(4)(c)[3].
[6]
The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority
to approve an administrative adjustment for chain-link fencing in
the front yard in residential districts, provided:
[a] A substantial number of similar
fencing exists on the frontage; and
[b] The existing fencing has been legally
installed.
[7]
The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority
to approve an administrative adjustment for central air-conditioning
units and the like in the side yard.
[a] A proposed unit shall be reviewed
to ensure that the installation will not have a detrimental impact
on the adjacent properties. Such review shall include an evaluation
of the following:
[i] Neighborhood characteristics, based
both on a physical evaluation of the streetscape and comments received
from the neighborhood.
[iv] Impact on the historic and/or
architectural integrity of the streetscape.
[b] When located in a preservation district, the Preservation Board shall have the authority to issue a certificate of appropriateness for side yard installations as outlined in §
120-194. In such cases no administrative adjustment shall be required. The Preservation Board shall apply the above-listed standards.
[8]
The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority
to approve an administrative adjustment for an addition, or the like,
to an existing structure which does not meet the side yard setback
requirements of this chapter but is similar to the side yard setback
of the existing structure.
[9] The Manager of Zoning shall have the authority to approve an administrative
adjustment to waive regulations pertaining to signs in the Center
City District, with the exception of signs associated with a project
undergoing site plan review.
(5) Limitations on administrative adjustments. An administrative
adjustment shall become null and void unless a certificate of zoning
compliance and/or building permit is obtained and work is commenced
within one year from the date of approval.
(6) Appeals.
(a)
Appeal of a decision by the Manager of Zoning on an administrative adjustment shall be taken to the Zoning Board of Appeals within 60 days of the date of the Manager of Zoning's decision in accordance with the procedures outlined in §
120-195.
(b)
An appeal from any final decision of the Zoning
Board of Appeals as to any matter regarding the administrative adjustment
may be taken within 30 days of the filing of such decision by any
person aggrieved or by any authorized officer, department, bureau,
board or commission of the City in accordance with Article 78 of the
New York Civil Practice Law and Rules.
B. Certificate of nonconformity.
(1) Authority. The Manager of Zoning, or a designee, shall have authority to issue a certificate of nonconformity, but only in accordance with the provisions of this section and Article
XXIV.
(2) Purpose. The certificate of nonconformity shall establish the legality of nonconforming uses, structures, lots and signs established prior to the effective date of this chapter that do not conform to the regulations of this chapter applicable in the zoning districts in which such nonconformities are located. When necessary to establish the legality of a nonconformity, a certificate of nonconformity shall be required for any nonconforming use, structure, lot and sign in the City of Rochester prior to the approval of additional zoning applications that may be required. A certificate of nonconformity shall not be issued to authorize the operation of a cannabis establishment in any of the R-1 Low-Density Residential, R-2 Medium-Density Residential or R-3 High-Density Residential Zoning Districts except in the instance of R-3 High-Density Residential premises that have previously been authorized by special permit to operate as a cannabis establishment in accordance with §
120-27 of this chapter.
[Amended 11-3-2022 by Ord. No. 2022-322]
(3) Criteria for determining intensity of use. In addition
to the provisions of the zoning district which would first permit
the establishment of a particular use as of right, the Manager of
Zoning shall also consider the following in determining the intensity
of a use as may be required by the regulations of this chapter pertaining
to nonconformities:
(c)
Volume and type of sales;
(d)
Type of processing activity;
(e)
Nature and location of storage;
(f)
Transportation requirements by volume, type
and characteristics;
(g)
Parking and loading characteristics;
(h)
Noise, smoke, odor, glare, vibration, radiation
and fumes.
(4) Additional approvals required.
(a)
In addition to the application for the certificate
of nonconformity, the following shall require an area variance from
the Zoning Board of Appeals:
[1]
Structural alteration or enlargement of a building or structure that is a legal nonconforming use and as defined in Article
XXIV.
[2]
Expansion of use of a legally existing nonconforming use and as defined in Article
XXIV.
(b)
In addition to the application for the certificate
of nonconformity, the following shall require a use variance from
the Zoning Board of Appeals:
[1]
Restoration of structures damaged or destroyed by any means not within the control of the owner to the extent of 60% or more as defined in Article
XXIV.
(c)
In addition to the application for the certificate
of nonconformity, the following shall require a special permit from
the Planning Commission:
[1]
Reestablishment of a use that is of the same or less intensity than the abandoned previous use in a structure not designed for a permitted use and as defined in Article
XXIV, provided that this approval shall not be issued to authorize the commencement of a cannabis establishment in any of the R-1 Low-Density Residential, R-2 Medium-Density Residential or R-3 High-Density Residential Zoning Districts. In addition to the standards set forth in §
120-192B(3), the Planning Commission shall consider the following:
[a] The building is a designated building
of historic value;
[b] The condition and/or economic life
of the building or structure;
[c] The potential use of the building
for neighborhood service uses; or
[d] The potential for employment opportunities
in the neighborhood.
(5) Procedure.
(a)
Application. The owner of any nonconformity
may at any time apply to the Manager of Zoning for a certificate of
nonconformity to establish the legality of nonconformity as of a specified
date. Such application shall contain such information as may be required
by the Manager of Zoning.
(b)
Action by Manager of Zoning. Within 45 days
following receipt by the Manager of Zoning of a completed application
or such longer time as may be agreed to by the applicant, the Manager
of Zoning shall cause such application to be reviewed for compliance
with this section and shall inform the applicant whether the application
has been approved, approved with restrictions or denied. The failure
of the Manager of Zoning to act within 45 days of a completed application
shall be deemed a denial.
(c)
Approval or denial.
[1]
Upon reviewing an application for a certificate
of nonconformity, the Manager of Zoning shall determine if the required
documents and proof are in order and determine if the use, lot, structure
or sign:
[a] Was lawfully existing at the time
of the adoption of the provision creating the nonconformity in question;
[b] Has been in continuous use since its establishment with no period of discontinuance causing abandonment, except as authorized pursuant to §
120-199G(3), and is not in violation of any other provisions of this chapter;
[c] Is of equal or less intensity than
the existing nonconformity;
[d] Was fire damaged less than the percentages of the cost of replacement new as set forth in §§
120-199 and
120-200.
[2]
The Manager of Zoning shall issue a certificate
evidencing such facts and setting forth the nature and extent of the
nonconformity; otherwise, the Manager of Zoning shall decline to issue
such certificate and shall declare such building, structure or sign
to be in violation of this chapter.
(6) Certificate issued based on false information. Any
certificate of nonconformity issued based on false information submitted
by the applicant shall be null and void.
(7) Limitation on certificates of nonconformity. A certificate
of nonconformity shall become null and void six months after the date
on which it was issued unless a building permit and a certificate
of occupancy are obtained and maintained.
(8) Appeals.
(a)
Appeal of a decision by the Manager of Zoning on a certificate of nonconformity shall be taken to the Zoning Board of Appeals within 60 days of the date of issuance of the Manager's decision in accordance with the procedures found in §
120-195.
(b)
An appeal from any final decision of the Zoning
Board of Appeals as to any matter regarding the certificate of nonconformity
may be taken within 30 days of the filing of such decision by any
person aggrieved or by any authorized officer, department, bureau,
board or commission of the City in accordance with Article 78 of the
New York Civil Practice Law and Rules.
C. Interpretation.
(1) Authority. The Manager of Zoning, or a designee, may,
subject to the procedures, standards and limitations hereinafter set
out, render interpretations of any provision of this chapter.
(2) Purpose. Interpretations by the Manager of Zoning
are intended to clarify the zoning text or map, including permitted
uses, district boundaries, meaning and intent of various portions
of this chapter and precise location of mapped district boundary lines.
(3) Interpretation standards. The following criteria shall
govern the Manager of Zoning and the Zoning Board of Appeals on appeals
of a decision by the Manager of Zoning in issuing use interpretations:
(a)
No interpretation relating to use shall be given
with respect to the R-1 through R-3 Residential Districts.
(b)
No interpretation shall permit a use that is
a prohibited use defined by this chapter.
(c)
No interpretation shall permit a use listed
as a permitted or special permit use in any district to be established
in any district in which such use is not so listed.
(d)
No interpretation shall permit any use in any
district unless evidence is presented which demonstrates that it will
comply with each use limitation established for the particular district.
(e)
No interpretation shall permit any use in any
district unless such use is substantially similar to other uses permitted
in such district and is more similar to such other uses than to uses
permitted or specially permitted in a more restrictive district.
(f)
If the proposed use is most similar to a use permitted only as a special permit in the district in which it is proposed to be located, then any use interpretation permitting such use shall be conditioned on the issuance of a special permit pursuant to §
120-192.
(4) Procedure.
(a)
Application. A request for interpretation of
any provision of this chapter shall be submitted in writing to the
Manager of Zoning. It shall set forth the specific provision or provisions
to be interpreted, the facts of the specific situation concerning
the request for an interpretation, and the precise interpretation
claimed by the applicant to be correct. Before the rendering of any
interpretation, the Manager of Zoning may require such further facts
and information as are, in his or her judgment, necessary to a meaningful
interpretation of the provision in question.
(b)
Action by Manager of Zoning. Within 10 business
days following the receipt of a completed request or application for
interpretation, the Manager of Zoning shall inform the applicant in
writing of the interpretation. The Manager of Zoning shall state the
specific precedent, reasons and analysis upon which such interpretation
is based.
(c)
Procedure following interpretation. Following
an interpretation by the Manager of Zoning, such interpretation shall
be appended to the official copy of this Zoning Code and distributed
with any copies of said Code until such time as a formal amendment
renders such appendix redundant.
(5) Effect of interpretation. An interpretation finding
a particular use to be permitted or specially permitted in a specified
district shall not authorize the establishment of such use nor the
development, construction, reconstruction, alteration or moving of
any building or structure but shall merely authorize the preparation,
filing and processing of applications for any permits and approvals
which may be required by the Code of the City of Rochester, including
but not limited to a permit for a special permit, a certificate of
zoning compliance, a building permit, a certificate of occupancy,
subdivision approval and site plan approval.
(6) Limitation on interpretations. If not made part of
this chapter, an interpretation shall become null and void one year
after the date the interpretation was made.
(7) Appeal.
(a)
Appeals of interpretations made by the Manager of Zoning shall be made to the Zoning Board of Appeals within 60 days of the date of the decision in accordance with the procedures found in §
120-195.
(b)
An appeal of an interpretation shall stay all
proceedings in furtherance of the interpretation appealed, including
the issuance of a building permit, unless the Manager of Zoning certifies
to the Zoning Board of Appeals after the notice of appeal has been
filed that a stay would cause substantial damage to life or property.
In such case, the proceedings shall not be stayed other than by a
majority vote of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
(c)
An appeal from any final decision of the Zoning
Board of Appeals as to any matter regarding the interpretations may
be taken within 30 days of the filing of such decision by any person
aggrieved or by any authorized officer, department, bureau, board
or commission of the City in accordance with Article 78 of the New
York Civil Practice Law and Rules.
D. Site plan review.
(1) Authority. Subject to the procedures, standards and
limitations set forth in this chapter, the Manager of Zoning, or a
designee, shall review and approve, approve with conditions or deny
applications for site plans.
(2) Purpose. The site plan review process recognizes that
some developments and uses, even though generally suitable for location
in a particular district, are, because of their design (materials,
details, textures), character, nature, size, complexity or other indicia
of probable impact, capable of adversely affecting the goals for which
this chapter is established unless careful consideration has been
given to critical design elements. It is the purpose of this section
to provide a vehicle for the review of the applicant's attention to
such elements.
(3) Site plan review thresholds for minor and major site
plan reviews. Site plan review in accordance with this section shall
be required in the following cases, with the exception of accessory
structures not changing land use or density and projects involving
no site or external structural alterations:
(a)
Minor site plan review shall be required for any development
or redevelopment that includes construction, enlargement or addition
to any building or any site preparation for a site or use that may
not include or require a building and meets one of the following:
[1]
New construction that does not meet the City-wide design standards set forth in this chapter, except those applications not meeting the residential building standards set forth in §
120-160A(2) to
(4).
[2]
Exterior alterations to existing buildings or structures and
all new construction in the CCD that include minor deviations from
the design criteria, excluding deviations pertaining to signs. (Note:
Refer to the pertinent Design Checklist at the end of this chapter
for a list of deviations.)
[3]
Exterior alterations to existing buildings in Village Center
Districts that do not meet the specific design standards listed in
those districts.
[4]
Applications that do not comply with neighborhood design guidelines adopted pursuant to §
120-161.
[5]
Parking lots over 10 spaces that do not meet the requirements for parking lots in §
120-173.
[Amended 9-19-2017 by Ord. No. 2017-299]
[6]
More than two loading spaces in any district adjacent to any
residential district or Open Space District.
[7]
Any loading space which does not meet the dimension requirements specified in §
120-172.
[8]
Any new structure or structures having a total floor area, or
covering a contiguous land area, in excess of 20,000 square feet which
do not comply with the City-wide Design Standards and all other zoning
requirements.
[9]
Any new construction on a vacant parcel of one acre or more.
[10] Projects involving or abutting a designated landmark
or those involving or abutting a site listed or eligible for listing
on the State or National Register of Historic Places.
[11] Projects within an O-S Open Space District and
commercial and industrial development adjacent to the O-S Open Space
District.
[12] Any outdoor activity area accessory to a nonresidential
use, excluding accessory outdoor seating.
[13] Projects within 100 feet of waterfront.
[14] New construction of multifamily dwellings.
[15] New advertising sign structures.
[16] In planned development districts, incremental development as defined in §
120-126B of this chapter.
[17] The conversion of floor area designed for nonresidential
use to a residential use and vice versa in any commercial, village
center, overlay, or residential district.
[18] Any development or redevelopment resulting in site grading exceeding the maximum slope requirements in §
120-178.
[19] Any development or redevelopment in all districts,
with the exception of detached single-family dwellings and two-family
dwellings, that involves the installation of a new curb cut in the
public right-of-way of principal arterials, minor arterials and collector
streets. (See Attachment SC, Street Classifications.)
(b)
Minor site plan review shall be required for the following:
[1]
All junkyards or salvage yards, recycling centers and waste
stations.
[2]
Prior to demolition, any site preparation, development or redevelopment
where demolition is proposed in the C-1, C-2, and Village Center Districts.
[3]
Conversion to or from any of the following vehicle-related uses
or the development or redevelopment of any sites devoted to such uses,
including:
[a] Vehicle service stations, vehicle repair, vehicle
sales/rental.
[b] Vehicle storage, wrecking, towing.
[d] Drive-through facilities and uses.
(c)
Major site plan review required. Major site plan review will
be required for any site plan meeting one or more of the thresholds
of minor site plan review and one of the following:
[1]
All Type I actions as identified in §
48-4 of the City Code, excluding applications requiring certificates of appropriateness.
[2]
Applications in the CCD that include major deviations from the
design criteria. (Note: Refer to the pertinent Design Checklist at
the end of this chapter for a list of major deviations.)
[3]
All development concept plan approvals or amendments for planned
development districts.
[4]
Construction of any principal building in the C-1, C-2, H-V
or PMV Districts that does not meet City-wide design standards set
forth in this chapter.
[5]
A redevelopment plan contingent upon the demolition of a designated
building of historic value, excluding applications requiring certificates
of appropriateness.
[6]
Sign proposals for designated buildings of historic value in
the CCD with minor deviations of the design criteria relating to number,
type and size.
(4) Denial criteria. The Manager of Zoning shall deny
an application on the basis of specific written findings directed
to one or more of the following:
(a)
The application is incomplete in specified particulars
or contains or reveals violations of this chapter or other applicable
regulations which the applicant has, after written request, failed
or refused to supply or correct.
(b)
The proposed site plan interferes unnecessarily,
and in specified particulars, with easements, roadways, rail lines,
utilities, and public or private rights-of-way.
(c)
The proposed site plan unnecessarily, and in
specified particulars, destroys, damages, detrimentally modifies or
interferes with the enjoyment of significant natural, topographic
or physical features of the site.
(d)
The proposed structures unnecessarily, and in
specified particulars, destroy, damage. detrimentally modify or interfere
with the significant design features of the existing buildings and
structures on the site.
(e)
The proposed structures or landscaping unnecessarily,
and in specified particulars, bear a poor relationship to the existing
physical development of the site or results in an overall development
that compromises existing design, parking or landscaping elements.
(f)
The site design does not comply with ADA requirements.
(g)
The proposed site plan unnecessarily, and in
specified particulars, is injurious or detrimental to the use and
enjoyment of surrounding property.
(h)
There is inadequate infrastructure capacity
to support the use or development.
(i)
The proposed site plan and associated improvements
fail to mitigate the project's anticipated traffic impacts.
(j)
The proposed site plan fails to provide for
adequate access for emergency vehicles.
(k)
The pedestrian and vehicular circulation elements
unnecessarily, and in specified particulars, create hazards to safety
on or off the site.
(l)
The proposed structure unnecessarily, and in
specified particulars, is lacking amenity in relation to or are incompatible
with, nearby structures and uses.
(m)
The proposed site plan unnecessarily, and in
specified particulars, is lacking amenity in relation to, or incompatible
with, nearby structures and uses.
(n)
The proposed site plan unnecessarily, and in
specified particulars, creates drainage or erosion problems.
(o)
The proposed structures unnecessarily, and in
specified particulars, are incompatible with or lacking in amenity
in relation to existing uses on the site or existing building materials,
roof shapes and fenestration on the site. .
(p)
The proposed site plan fails to contribute to
existing pedestrian-oriented rights-of way and unnecessarily, and
in specified particulars, is lacking in amenity in relation to the
public realm and streetscape.
(q)
The proposed site plan detrimentally impacts
the visual and physical access to and along the waterfront
(r)
In the CCD, the proposed site plan is contrary to, or fails to meet, the principles and objectives of the Center City Master Plan as enumerated in §
120-58 of this chapter.
(5) Procedure.
(a)
Application. Applications for minor and major
site plans shall be submitted in a form and in such numbers as required
by the Manager of Zoning. A nonrefundable fee, as established from
time to time by the City Council to help defray administrative costs,
shall accompany each application. The Manager of Zoning may also request
such other and further information and documentation deemed necessary
or appropriate to a full and proper consideration and disposition
of the particular application.
(b)
Action by Manager of Zoning.
[1]
Within 30 days following receipt by the Manager
of Zoning of a completed application or such longer time as may be
agreed to by the applicant, the Manager of Zoning shall cause such
application and the attached plans to be reviewed for compliance with
this chapter and shall render a decision.
[2]
For all major site plans, the Manager of Zoning
will refer the site plan to the Project Review Committee which shall
review and make a recommendation to the Manager of Zoning regarding
the site plan.
[3]
Processing multi-action applications.
[a] In cases where site plan review
applications are required in conjunction with other special process
applications, site plan review shall precede all other applications.
The applicant shall submit all appropriate application and State Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQRA) forms.
[b] Following appropriate staff and
agency review, the lead agency shall prepare a SEQRA environmental
significance determination and preliminary site plan review findings.
[c] At this point, any special review
process applications shall be submitted and public hearings held in
accordance with this article.
[d] Only upon approval of such special
review applications shall a final site plan review decision be made.
(c)
Approval or denial.
[1]
The Manager of Zoning shall issue a final decision
on each site plan. The decision of the Manager of Zoning, which shall
be based on the findings set forth, shall be final and shall:
[b] Approve the application with conditions;
or
[2]
In any case where an application is denied,
the Manager of Zoning shall state the specific reasons and shall cite
the specific provisions of this chapter upon which such denial is
based.
[3]
The Manager of Zoning shall stamp each copy
of the application and plans to reflect the action taken and shall
return one copy of each to the applicant and shall retain one copy
of each in City records for such period as he or she may deem necessary
or as may be required by law.
(d)
Regional context review criteria.
[1]
Linkage. To the maximum practical extent, new
development shall be laid out and designed to provide walkways and
paths that connect with destinations such as parks, schools and shopping
areas within and outside the municipal boundaries.
[2]
Location of existing and planned transit routes.
Any proposed development shall consider the location of existing and
planned transit routes and provide vehicular and pedestrian connections
to any transit points within or adjacent to the development.
(e)
Amendment. An approved site plan may be amended
at any time in the same manner and subject to the same standards and
limitations as provided in this section for original site plan approval
except as otherwise authorized by the Manager of Zoning.
(6) Letters of credit.
(a)
Each applicant shall be required to provide
evidence of the financing plan that the applicant proposes to use
to complete the proposed project, which may include a letter of credit,
or similar security acceptable to the Manager of Zoning, and a fully
executed agreement in the form provided by the City. The letter of
credit in favor of the City of Rochester for the estimated cost of
required site improvements shall be unconditional and irrevocable
for a period of not to exceed two years. The agreement shall also
be irrevocable for a period of two years and shall permit the City
of Rochester to enter the subject property and to install such improvements
if the applicant fails to do so within the period of time specified
in the agreement.
(b)
Such letter of credit or similar security, and
the agreement, each in a form satisfactory to the Manager of Zoning,
shall be submitted prior to obtaining a building permit as a condition
of site plan approval.
(c)
Should the applicant fail to perform the required
site improvements within the agreed period of time, the Manager of
Zoning shall issue a written notice of such failure to the applicant.
It shall be sufficient service of such notice if it is mailed to the
applicant at the address provided by him or her in the site plan application.
If the applicant fails to perform the required site improvements within
15 business days of the issuance of such notice, the Manager of Zoning
is authorized to draw upon the letter of credit or to access any other
offered security as may be necessary to cover the costs to the City
to perform work which the applicant failed to perform. The applicant
may request a hearing before the Manager of Zoning within five days
from the issuance of the notice. The hearing will be held before the
expiration of the notice period of 15 business days.
(d)
The letter of credit or other security, described
in this subsection, may be waived by the Manager of Zoning where:
[1]
No site improvements or alterations to the site
are associated with the application for site plan approval and no
site improvement conditions have been attached to such approval.
[2]
None of the proposed or required site improvements
will have any discernible impact on adjacent private property or on
the public right-of-way, and such improvements primarily affect the
user of the property and not adjacent property owners or the general
public.
[3]
Evidence of the applicant's satisfactory completion
of prior site plan review projects is offered in lieu of a letter
of credit.
[4]
Evidence of a satisfactory financing plan that
will guarantee completion of the required site improvements.
(7) Effect of site plan approval. If the Manager of Zoning
or the Planning Commission shall approve the application, or approve
it subject to further specified approvals or conditions which are
acceptable to the applicant, such approval shall not authorize the
establishment or expansion of any use nor the development, construction,
reconstruction, alteration or moving of any building or structure.
(8) Limitations on site plan approvals. A site plan approval
shall become null and void one year after the date on which it was
issued unless a building permit is obtained and maintained.
(9) Referrals and appeals.
(a)
Referrals of a decision by the Manager of Zoning on a site plan review application shall be taken to the City Planning Commission within 30 days of the decision. A public hearing shall be set, advertised and conducted by the Planning Commission in accordance with §
120-188. The Commission shall review the application in accordance with the denial criteria set forth in §
120-191D(4) and shall render a decision within 30 days following the conclusion of the public hearing. The failure of the Commission to act within 30 days shall be deemed an endorsement of the decision of the Manager of Zoning.
(b)
An appeal from any final decision of the Planning
Commission as to any matter regarding the site plan review may be
taken within 30 days of the filing of such decision by any person
aggrieved or by any authorized officer, department, bureau, board
or commission of the City in accordance with Article 78 of the New
York Civil Practice Law and Rules.